Statistical Delivery Date not apperaing in the Purchase Order

Hi Gurus,
Recently the statistical delivery date(SDD) in the Purchse order has stopped appearing in the PO.
Earlier it was appearing but since last one month it has stopped appearing.
The field remains blank inspite of sending the message to the vendor & changing the delivery date of the line item.
Is there any Config setting which i am missing.
or is there any SAP Note to be applied.
Thank you
NS

did you change something in your system and process?
using BAPI or userexits, modified standard program?

Similar Messages

Does the inbound delivery date get updated in the Purchase Order?

Dear Experts,
Here is the use case, The original delivery date in the purchase order is 01.11.2011. Accordingly, the supplier sends an ASN to my client against the PO with the same delivery date. However, now, store keeper of my client wants to receive the stock on 03.11.2011.
1) Can the store keeper/ goods recipient change the delivery date in the corresponding inbound delivery document to 03.11.2011?
2) Will the change of the intended delivery date be notified back to the supplier who has triggered the ASN?
3) Will the new delivery date be updated back in the purchase order?
Point 3 is particularly important for the client from vendor evaluation point of view as any delay from the client side should not affect the vendor performance for ontime delivery.
Thanks in advance,
Ranjan
Ranjan Sutradhar

for point 2 not the dates wont be sent back to supplier untill unless you have any logic writen for that and if there is a Interface designed for it and I dont there will be any since ASN is sent from Vendor and if you are changing the dates in ASN .
for point 3 no its not going to change the delivery date in PO at item level but at the item detial level in PO history tab the scheduled date and delivery date as per ASN will be mentioned
its better you run the case in system and check it....this wont take much time

Bapi to update delivery date in confirmation tab in purchase order me22n tc

Hi All,
I am writing a BDC to update the data in confirmation tab for puchase orders for enjoy transaction.
Please let me know how to updated delivery date in confirmation tab in purchase order(ME22N) using a bapi.
I tried using BAPI_PO_CHANGE but found no parameter related to confirmations tab. this BAPI has every thing to update like header data, item data, scheduling data..... except confirmation.
So please let me know how to update the data in confirmation.
We need to use only enjoy transaction ME22N not ME22 in BDC thats why we are looking for a BAPI.
Regards,
Venkat

Hi
Check the table parameter POCONFIRMATION in BAPI_PO_CHANGE
U can see the field DELIV_DATE in the structure BAPIEKES.
DELIVERY_DATE in the structure BAPIMEPOSCHEDULE as well.
Regards,
Dwaraka.S
Edited by: Dwarakanath Sankarayogi on Feb 5, 2009 7:57 AM

Supplier not visible in the Purchase Order Menu

Hi All,
I have created a Supplier and a Supplier Site from the back end using Supplier Conversion.
It was successful and I am able to see the customer in the Supplier menu in Payables and Supplier base menu in the Purchasing, but the supplier is not visible in the Purchase Order Menu in Purchasing.
I have Enabled the following flags in the Supplier Site Level,
               l_vendor_site_rec.purchasing_site_flag := 'Y';
               l_vendor_site_rec.pay_site_flag := 'Y';
               l_vendor_site_rec.rfq_only_site_flag := 'Y';
What else do I need to enable in Supplier level for the Supplier to be visible for Purchasing.
Please give me a solution so that I can resolve my issue.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Bhaskar.

Hi,
You will have to achieve this through APIs, Please do some google and refer Oracle docs.
Following are some links, which may interest you:
R12 Oracle Apps: Supplier or Vendor Creation API
Oracle EBS Technical Step By Step: August 2012
Hope this helps!
Best Regards

Idoc to uodate delivery date of line item on Purchase order

Hi All,
Our vendor sends a delivery file consisting of delivery date and quantity(could be partial) for line items of a purchase order.
I need to update the Purchase order line item with the delivery date and quantity sent from the Vendor. It should add a new confirmation line with custom confirmation category in the confirmation tab of the line item in the Purchase order.
Each time we get a delivery file we need to add a new confirmation line in the confirmation tab of the purchase order line item.
How can I get this working using inbound idoc processing? Which Idoc type should I use to solve my issue. Will ORDERSP work for my scenario?
Thank you in advance!
Sonali.

Hi,
I don't know about IDOCS, but since your vendor is not using EDI, but rather sends a file, you could right a small program to read the confirmations from the file, using the standard BAPI "BAPI_PO_CHANGE" to actually change the PO accordingly.
Regards,
Mario

Quantity is not shown in the purchase order history of the Service PO

Hi
We have a service PO for which we made a service entry sheet and released the same. In the background GR with 101 movement type also done correctly. But when we refer the purchase order history, we found the SE Number and the GR number but the QUANTITY field shows empty. The amount field got updated. But none of the qty fields like Quantity, Delivery cost Quantity, Quantity in OPUn shows empty.
Please let me what should be reason for this.
Thanks
Venkat.

Hi, please try marking Srv-based inv.ver. in the purchising data of the vendor master.
Rgards.

"Partner Delivery Point Not Found" in SUS Purchase Order

Working on SRM5.0, I have created Purchase Orders in SRM which have been transmitted to SUS via XI. The PO's appear in SUS, but when I try to process the PO as the vendor (in order to send a PO response / goods confirmation etc back to SRM), the following error message appears "Partner Delivery Point not found" and the process can go no further.
When looking at the partner functions that are maintained in the SUS
PO, I can see a Sold-to party and a Goods recipient that have both a
Business Partner Number and an Address. However, the Delivery Point
partner has no Business Partner number, but does have an Address.
I am fairly certain there is no problem with the SRM shopping cart / PO. One of the examples I have looked at is as follows:
Cart and PO have the following partners maintained:
Requester - 509
Goods Recipient - 509
Delivery Point - 491
Location - 511
Vendor - 100122
The XML message sent via XI for this cart / PO has the following partners (confusing use of naming!):
Buyer - 491
Seller - 100122
Product Recipient - 509
Bill-to - 491 (Although same BP number as delivery point above, address is not the same and does not appear to come from any of the BP's mentioned above!)
Ship-to - 511 (Although same BP number as location above, address is not the same and does not appear to come from any of the BP's mentioned above and is same address as the Bill-to)
The SUS PO (attached) has the following partners:
Sold-to - 491
Goods Recipient - 509
Delivery Point - (Blank BP Number but address appears to come from business partner 491 as it is the same as the sold-to address above)
My understanding of this 'mapping' between the 3 components is as follows:
In the SRM shopping cart / PO you need the partners Requester, Goods Recipient, Delivery Point, Location and Vendor.
In the SUS PO you need at least Sold-to party, Goods Recipient and Delivery Point.
When SRM generates the XML message for the PO (to go to SUS via XI), it maps the business partners from the SRM PO to business partners in the XML file.
When SUS receives the XML message from XI, it maps the business partners from the XML file to the appropriate place in the SUS PO
Looking at my example, it is not obvious how the partners map from SRM to XML message in XI to SUS and nowhere in the XML message is there an address maintained without a business partner number so it appears that the business partner number is being 'lost' by SUS as it creates the PO.
I have searched OSS extensively and found very few messages which seem relevant (744231 looked promising, but has already been applied according to our patch level).
Any pointers???
Thanks,
Matt

Hi
<b>Please go through the following SAP OSS Notes as well, which will help -></b>
Note 723680 - Corrections in the mapping of SAP XML messages
Note 744231 - No locations and delivery addresses are transferred
<u>Related Notes</u>
Note 728629 - SRM 4.0 XML confirmation/invoice hierarchy items
Note 723594 - SRM 4.0 XML confirmation mapping error
Note 725895 - SUS 2.0 SP04 Patch for Java
Note 731037 - Converting SUS 1.0 and SUS 2.0 documents to SUS 3.0
Note 679671 SUS 2.0 WPS SP03 Patch 4 / SP04 Patch 6
Note 895217 - SUS30: SUS not integrated with CUA currently
Note 825820 - SRM40-SUS: Follow-on error when converting purchase orders
Note 782482 - Document texts are missing after conversion to SUS 3.0
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

PO not visible in the Purchase Orders screen

Hi All,
There is a Purchase Order which we are not able to view in the 'Purchase Orders' screen. The PO status is 'IN PROCESS'. The PO is visible in the Purchase Orders Summary screen. Need to do some changes to the PO. Can you please let me know the exact cause for the issue.
Regards,
Radhika.

There are times that documents may go into In Process - due to workflow setbacks.
Please use the script POXRESPO.sql for these situations.
The script resides in $PO_TOP/sql.
You can also obtain it from the following patch -
Patch 9072294 - Oracle Purchasing Reset PO script was giving a 'ORA-01476: DIVISOR IS EQUAL TO ZERO' Error.
The script will handle most scenarios and can also take action to save the action history or remove it - but more importantly considers budgetary implications
if Encumbrance is turned on in the system.
The script given previous is not recommended.
Regards,
Mike

Onetime vendor - address is not copied into the purchase order ME21N

Dear all,
I have a issue about using onetime vendors, if I have entered a dummy address on the onetime vendor, this address is not copied into the prucase order when I create a PO for this vendor type.
My problem is that we want to use the ME59 to create PO automatically for these onetime vendors but I get the message 06035 - Enter a address on the PO.
So my question is if anybody can propose a solution for this.
Best regards, LB

>
Lars Birk wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have a issue about using onetime vendors, if I have entered a dummy address on the onetime vendor, this address is not copied into the prucase order when I create a PO for this vendor type.
> My problem is that we want to use the ME59 to create PO automatically for these onetime vendors but I get the message 06035 - Enter a address on the PO.
> So my question is if anybody can propose a solution for this.
>
>
> Best regards, LB
One time vendor can never hold vendor specific details i.e. vendor details and bank details. You cannot use a one time vendor for ME59, use regular vendor account instead for your requirement or enter the address manually at time of conversion as per the message.
Edited by: Afshad Irani on Jul 13, 2010 1:34 PM

Actual delivery Date not coming in the extractor 2LIS_11_V_SSL

Hi
I am trying to get the Confirmed and Actual Delivery date for a Order from ECC in BIW. The extractor 2LIS_11_V_SSL has both these fields. But when I check the data in the extract checker (RSA3) in ECC, I always get the Actual Delivery Time as Blank.
Is there any problem with the standard extractor? Or anything needs to be done to get this field from ECC.
The BI Content Version in ECC is 703 SP 4.
Actually I want to know whether the Order is delivered on Time or not, Is there any way like status which can tell me if the Order is "Delivered on Time" or not
TIA
Abhishek

Yes we were using the field MCEX_I_LFDAT Actual Delivery Date. It only gets filled for confirmed deliveries and is blank for other orders.
Though the values were not tallying with what the Functional Team wanted. So now we are using the field MCEX_I_WADAT (Acttual Good Issue Date) from the source system. We are still using the extract 2LIS_11_V_SSL for the same. This field is filled from the Deliveries from the Source System.
Both the Extracts 2LIS_12_VCHDR, 2LIS_12_VCITM also have Actual Goods Issue (GI) Date and no Actual Delivery Date. Though these come from different fileds in different tables.
Closing the Post.
Thanks
Abhishek

Delivery date not confirmed on the same day even though stock available

    Hi Experts - We are creating an STO in Brazil where stock is moving from 1 plant to another plant.
    Current ATP situation is as follows: which shows 22 EA still available.
We are creating the STO from the plant 3004 to plant 3005.
We are confused why the system is proposing the delivery date of March 17 instead of March 14, in spite of sufficient quantity being available.
We do understand that it takes 03/17/2014 because of the upcoming weekend. But when stock is available on March 14, we would have expected this result.
These are the key configurations that I have done:
Material Master:
MRP View: Planned Delivery Time is 0
MRP Type: PD (MRP)
Checking Group: 02
Assign delivery type and checking rule config for Material Master is also done as follows:
Request your help please!
Regards
Siddharth Sridhar

Yes If Stock is available for material & still date is changing in STO creation than may be this could have happened due to time zone setting,
2 option-I would request you   also go through Stock requirement List (MD04) & check where some pending order is lying & some purchase orders if yes then first block them,
Sometime it heppens if earlier for same material you would have created Sales order (qty is 20) & stock available qty is 15 & still with 15 qty you would have done PGI.& after some time your would have done migo for the same shortage material & this time 5 qty material could be adjusted in shortage order that's why if you go through md04 then you would be able to block shortage qty which is adjusted,n now date is showing deff,
hope this would help,
Thanks,
Kamlesh

Prevent GR with the delivery complete indicator set in the purchase order

Dear friends,
During GR reference to PO, if goods are received partially and the delivery complete indicator is set, the PO line item is deemed to be closed.
However, if reference is made again to the same PO line item, GR can still be done to the item that delivery complete indicator was set.(due to there is still quantity to be received)
Is there anyway, we could prevent reference to be made to a PO line item that has delivery complete indicator set?
Thank you.
Regards.

it is by design that you still can receive material.
See SAPs explanation here:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/a5/63343943a211d189410000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
The delivery complete indicator only reduces the commitment values to zero.
If you want restrict further good receipts, then you have to reduce PO quantity to equal the received quantity and must not allow overdelvivery. Further you can enter a latest GR date, which will not allow receipt beyond this date.
Locking the item will as well prevent further actions, but this should only be a short term solution, because the PO will still be considered in MRP runs and will never treated as beeing closed. And you will not be able to archive such POs

Invoice not match with the purchase order - Error FRM-40350

Hola a Todos, tengo un problema en el modulo AP al ejecutar "Lotes de Facturas" (Invoice Batches) cuando se quiere asociar una Orden de compra con la Factura, en las siguientes imagenes se muestra lo que sucedio.-
Hi Everyone, I have a problem in the AP module to run "Invoice Batches" when you want to associate a purchase order with the invoice is not match, in the following images shown what paso.-
Version Oracle EBS = 11.5.10.2
he visto las siguiente tablas y esto me muestra
Table RCV_TRANSACTIONS, no record found.-
gracias si alguien sabe cual es el problema.-
thank..

Hi,
Please be informed that for one a GR document wrt PO only one excise invoice can exist.
Ex PO-4500000010
GR no 5000000010
only one excise can exist and if the same excise invoice is reffered to another GR with the same PO system will throw an error message. Please let me know the exact business requirement in detail.
Naveen

Tax details not appearing in the purchase order

Dear Gurus,
Am using tax procedure TAXINN. and i have maintained the respective values for the condition type even though while creating purchase order am trying to click the TAXES button but its not simulating the values that pop up taxes screen is not appearing. but all the CIN settings maintained correctly in J1ID also the values maintained correctly..
any other setting is required...
Please advise me..
Regards
Anand

Check tax code is assigned to company code in CIN SPRO settings.

How to block the Statistical delivery date in purchase order from updation

Hello All,
We have the following requirement from our client.
The client wants to track the delay in delivery of purchase orders raised to vendors. Currently the users, change the delivery date and then process the PO if there are any delays. The client wants to STOP this and track any changes being made.
We created a new screen layout for purchase orders and checked the Statistics relevant delivery date as DISPLAY
However, when we tested the same, the statistical delivery date was changed along with delivery date, when the delivery date was changed in the Purchase order, though the option for statistical delivery date was seen a DISPLAY field only.
Please provide us your suggestions on any other options available.
R's
Manoj.

if your client wants to track the delay of a delivery from your vendor, then he has to give the vendor a chance that he can deliver on time. And the usual way to do this is by sending the PO to the vendor.
if you cange the delivery date before output of messagem then your vendor could not even know the original delivery date, so it is not the vendors fault if he cannot meet this date.
if you change the delivery date after output of message , then the statistical delivery date will stay with the old date.
the field is always open to maintain because it is not always the vendor who is reponsible for a delivery date change.
if you want to change the delivery date because you can take the quantity at that date, then it is not the vendors fault, in this case you have to change the statistical delviery date to evaluate the vendors delivery performance against the new date.
And often forgotten in this evaluation process is the warehouse personell that finally posts the goods receipt. if they post it with delay and do not change the goods reeipt date, then the vendor is as well evaluated to bad.

Statistical Delivery Date not apperaing in the Purchase Order

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for