Statpack report
Hi,
i have applicated the spreport.sql for having a report on my server in slow state,
in the "Top 5 Timed Events" the event :
Avg
Total Wait wait Waits
Event Waits Timeouts Time (s) (ms) /txn
log buffer space 1,195 140 436 365 -0.0
it mean that:
1- The buffer for logfiles is too small
2- Or the acces on disk is too long for the location of logfiles .
For 1-
The value for log_buffer is 524288 is it too small, if i increase it, are there any impacts on other parameters.
For 2-
We are on RAID 5 and we have not other possibilities.
Regards.
you are right Tom. It was an error in the last report.
That 's the new one:
Snap Id Snap Time Sessions Curs/Sess Comment
Begin Snap: 4 21-Apr-06 08:00:17 38 3.9
End Snap: 5 21-Apr-06 08:40:13 95 3.7
Elapsed: 39.93 (mins)
Cache Sizes (end)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Buffer Cache: 1,920M Std Block Size: 8K
Shared Pool Size: 336M Log Buffer: 512K
Load Profile
~~~~~~~~~~~~ Per Second Per Transaction
Redo size: 14,185.35 5,237.00
Logical reads: 2,769.19 1,022.34
Block changes: 79.48 29.34
Physical reads: 73.84 27.26
Physical writes: 9.06 3.35
User calls: 33.02 12.19
Parses: 48.71 17.98
Hard parses: 6.12 2.26
Sorts: 5.94 2.19
Logons: 0.07 0.03
Executes: 49.80 18.39
Transactions: 2.71
% Blocks changed per Read: 2.87 Recursive Call %: 89.94
Rollback per transaction %: 3.41 Rows per Sort: 923.06
Instance Efficiency Percentages (Target 100%)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Buffer Nowait %: 99.98 Redo NoWait %: 100.00
Buffer Hit %: 97.42 In-memory Sort %: 100.00
Library Hit %: 95.58 Soft Parse %: 87.44
Execute to Parse %: 2.19 Latch Hit %: 99.77
Parse CPU to Parse Elapsd %: 4.91 % Non-Parse CPU: 55.12
Shared Pool Statistics Begin End
Memory Usage %: 79.12 95.73
% SQL with executions>1: 7.38 5.37
% Memory for SQL w/exec>1: 9.70 8.16
Top 5 Timed Events
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ % Total
Event Waits Time (s) Ela Time
latch free 25,565 1,743 54.01
db file sequential read 48,535 560 17.35
db file scattered read 10,692 528 16.38
CPU time 187 5.81
buffer busy waits 1,294 69 2.13
Thanks for any suggestion.
Similar Messages
-
How to understand STATPACKS report ?
Hi,
How to understand STATPACKS report ? Some documents or link ?
Thank you.http://www.akadia.com/services/ora_statspack_survival_guide.html
http://download-uk.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a96533/statspac.htm
http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2008/02/18/analysing-statspack/
and many..many more....!!!!
Grrod reading...
Sim -
No statpack report from 10g onwards required
I had a query that statpack report may not be required in 10g onwards as AWR (Automatic workload repository) has been introduced since 10g.
I hope, my question is clear that is it possible to allocate a certain amount for memory for the database.
Please revert with the reply to my query.
RegardsSorry about the post, please do not consider that sentence as my query was limited to only whether statpack report may not be required in 10g onwards as AWR has been introduced since 10g.
-
Statpack analyzing of 9i database.
hi Expertise
Please help me for sorting the statpack report of my production DB in 9i. Also advise some recommendation after analyzing my statpack view.
Elapsed: 3.75 (min) 225 (sec)
DB Time: 7.84 (min) 470.65 (sec)
Cache: 10,016 MB
Block Size: 8,192 bytes
Transactions: 2.01 per second
Performance Summary
Physical Reads: 15,666/sec MB per second: 122.39 MB/sec
Physical Writes: 22/sec MB per second: 0.17 MB/sec
Single-block Reads: 1,412.69/sec Avg wait: 0.03 ms
Multi-block Reads: 1,916.26/sec Avg wait: 0.05 ms
Tablespace Reads: 3,346/sec Writes: 22/sec
Top 5 Events
Event Percentage of Total Timed Events
CPU time 79.89%
PX Deq: Execute Reply 6.38%
db file scattered read 4.32%
SQL*Net more data from dblink 4.29%
db file sequential read 2.00%
Tablespace I/O Stats
Tablespace Read/s Av Rd(ms) Blks/Rd Writes/s Read% % Total IO
TS_CCPS 3,117 0 2.5 0 100% 92.5%
TS_OTHERS 204 0.2 26.2 1 99% 6.09%
TS_AC_POSTED03 19 1.9 127 2 89% 0.63%
Load Profile
Logical reads: 42,976/s Parses: 39.41/s
Physical reads: 15,666/s Hard parses: 5.43/s
Physical writes: 22/s Transactions: 2.01/s
Rollback per transaction: 0% Buffer Nowait: 100%
4 Recommendations:
Your database has relatively high logical I/O at 42,976 reads per second. Logical Reads includes data block reads from both memory and disk. High LIO is sometimes associated with high CPU activity. CPU bottlenecks occur when the CPU run queue exceeds the number of CPUs on the database server, and this can be seen by looking at the "r" column in the vmstat UNIX/Linux utility or within the Windows performance manager. Consider tuning your application to reduce unnecessary data buffer touches (SQL Tuning or PL/SQL bulking), using faster CPUs or adding more CPUs to your system.
You are performing more than 15,666 disk reads per second. High disk latency can be caused by too-few physical disk spindles. Compare your read times across multiple datafiles to see which datafiles are slower than others. Disk read times may be improved if contention is reduced on the datafile, even though read times may be high due to the file residing on a slow disk. You should identify whether the SQL accessing the file can be tuned, as well as the underlying characteristics of the hardware devices.
Check your average disk read speed later in this report and ensure that it is under 7ms. Assuming that the SQL is optimized, the only remaining solutions are the addition of RAM for the data buffers or a switch to solid state disks. Give careful consideration these tablespaces with high read I/O: TS_CCPS, TS_OTHERS, TS_AC_POSTED03, TS_RATING, TS_GP.
You have more than 1,222 unique SQL statements entering your shared pool, with the resulting overhead of continuous RAM allocation and freeing within the shared pool. A hard parse is expensive because each incoming SQL statement must be re-loaded into the shared pool; with the associated overhead involved in shared pool RAM allocation and memory management. Once loaded, the SQL must then be completely re-checked for syntax & semantics and an executable generated. Excessive hard parsing can occur when your shared_pool_size is too small (and reentrant SQL is paged out) or when you have non-reusable SQL statements without host variables. See the cursor_sharing parameter for an easy way to make SQL reentrant and remember that you should always use host variables in you SQL so that they can be reentrant.
Instance Efficiency
Buffer Hit: 69.13% In-memory Sort: 100%
Library Hit: 96.4% Latch Hit: 99.99%
Memory Usage: 95.04% Memory for SQL: 64.19%
2 Recommendations:
Your Buffer Hit ratio is 69.13%. The buffer hit ratio measures the probability that a data block will be in the buffer cache upon a re-read of the data block. If your database has a large number of frequently referenced table rows (a large working set), then investigate increasing your db_cache_size. For specific recommendations, see the output from the data buffer cache advisory utility (using the v$db_cache_advice utility). Also, a low buffer hit ratio is normal for applications that do not frequently re-read the same data blocks. Moving to SSD will alleviate the need for a large data buffer cache.
Your shared pool maybe filled with non-reusable SQL with 95.04% memory usage. The Oracle shared poolcontains Oracle´s library cache, which is responsible for collecting, parsing, interpreting, and executing all of the SQL statements that go against the Oracle database. You can check the dba_hist_librarycache table in Oracle10g to see your historical library cache RAM usage.
SQL Statistics
Click here to see all SQL data
Wait Events
Event Waits Wait Time (s) Avg Wait (ms) Waits/txn
PX Deq: Execute Reply 137 30 219 0.3
db file scattered read 431,159 20 0 951.8
SQL*Net more data from dblin 51,140 20 0 112.9
db file sequential read 317,856 9 0 701.7
io done 6,842 5 1 15.1
db file parallel read 21 1 52 0.0
local write wait 250 1 4 0.6
db file parallel write 825 1 1 1.8
SQL*Net message from dblink 208 1 3 0.5
log file parallel write 2,854 1 0 6.3
0 Recommendations:
Instance Activity Stats
Statistic Total per Second per Trans
SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 87,889 390.6 194.0
consistent gets 10,141,287 45,072.4 22,387.0
consistent gets - examination 884,579 3,931.5 1,952.7
db block changes 100,342 446.0 221.5
execute count 18,913 84.1 41.8
parse count (hard) 1,222 5.4 2.7
parse count (total) 8,868 39.4 19.6
physical reads 3,525,003 15,666.7 7,781.5
physical reads direct 539,879 2,399.5 1,191.8
physical writes 5,132 22.8 11.3
physical writes direct 29 0.1 0.1
redo writes 1,598 7.1 3.5
session cursor cache hits 4,378 19.5 9.7
sorts (disk) 0 0.0 0.0
sorts (memory) 4,988 22.2 11.0
table fetch continued row 310 1.4 0.7
table scans (long tables) 82 0.4 0.2
table scans (short tables) 18,369 81.6 40.6
workarea executions - onepass 0 0.0 0.0
5 Recommendations:
You have high network activity with 390.6 SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client per second, which is a high amount of traffic. Review your application to reduce the number of calls to Oracle by encapsulating data requests into larger pieces (i.e. make a single SQL request to populate all online screen items). In addition, check your application to see if it might benefit from bulk collection by using PL/SQL "forall" or "bulk collect" operators.
You have 3,931.5 consistent gets examination per second. "Consistent gets - examination" is different than regular consistent gets. It is used to read undo blocks for consistent read purposes, but also for the first part of an index read and hash cluster I/O. To reduce logical I/O, you may consider moving your indexes to a large blocksize tablespace. Because index splitting and spawning are controlled at the block level, a larger blocksize will result in a flatter index tree structure.
You have high update activity with 446.0 db block changes per second. The DB block changes are a rough indication of total database work. This statistic indicates (on a per-transaction level) the rate at which buffers are being dirtied and you may want to optimize your database writer (DBWR) process. You can determine which sessions and SQL statements have the highest db block changes by querying the v$session and v$sessatst views.
You have high disk reads with 15,666.7 per second. Reduce disk reads by increasing your data buffer size or speed up your disk read speed by moving to SSD storage. You can monitor your physical disk reads by hour of the day using AWR to see when the database has the highest disk activity.
You have high small table full-table scans, at 81.6 per second. Verify that your KEEP pool is sized properly to cache frequently referenced tables and indexes. Moving frequently-referenced tables and indexes to SSD or theWriteAccelerator will significantly increase the speed of small-table full-table scans.
Buffer Pool Advisory
Current: 3,599,469,418 disk reads
Optimized: 1,207,668,233 disk reads
Improvement: 66.45% fewer
The Oracle buffer cache advisory utility indicates 3,599,469,418 disk reads during the sample interval. Oracle estimates that doubling the data buffer size (by increasing db_cache_size) will reduce disk reads to 1,207,668,233, a 66.45% decrease.
Init.ora Parameters
Parameter Value
cursor_sharing similar
db_block_size 8,192
db_cache_size 8GB
db_file_multiblock_read_count 32
db_keep_cache_size 1GB
hash_join_enabled true
log_archive_start true
optimizer_index_caching 90
optimizer_index_cost_adj 25
parallel_automatic_tuning false
pga_aggregate_target 2GB
query_rewrite_enabled true
session_cached_cursors 300
shared_pool_size 2.5GB
optimizercost_model choose
1 Recommendations:
You are not using large blocksizes for your index tablespaces. Oracle research proves that indexes will build flatter tree structures in larger blocksizes.Systemwide Tuning using STATSPACK Reports [ID 228913.1] and http://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/statspack-examples/ should be useful.
-
Statspack HTML reports to Analyze
Hi Experts,
I have always used ADDM to interpret the AWR reports.
Now, we have an environment which is not licensed to use diagnostic pack; so we are collecting statspack reports level 7 periodically;
Statspack html reports look like AWR reports, but, I sill missed the useful information that ADDM report deliver;
I would like to know if there is any useful tool FREE that could help me analyze the HTML statpacks reports;
I found a few but only accept Statspack text format.
I don't have access to the database server and I only provided the HTML statpacks reports to interpret,
Thank youStatspack in HTML format , sounds interesting , can you tell how to get them.
-
Repository reports differences
Hi,
Does anyone have a complete list of the changes that where made to the naming of Repository Reports between 1.3.2 and 6.0. I have to deliver CDM reports given in the old name from a Designer 6.0 repository and I can't find the right reports.
Thanks for the help.
RATL..hi,
if your where to run a statpack report and an awr report from sql you would see very little difference between them as far as I have seen. there must however be some benefits for awr as this is the way that Oracle is going. As far as I am aware you need no special privilege to run awr.
rgds
alan -
STATSPACK Report in Oracle RAC
Dear friends,
When I tried to make a STASPACK report on RAC nodes, I got the following error:
The starting snap_id doesnot belong to this instance.
When I tried using the other node, I got hte error:
The ending snap_id doesnot belong to this instance.
Is there any thing to do special for RAC expect for the constraint of STATSPACK be of level 7 or higher.
Regards,
Aravind K RSnapshots are different for different nodes. Please put the correct snap ID for gathering the statpack report.
Regards
Asif Kabir -
Statspack: High log file sync timeouts and waits
Hi all,
Please see an extract from our statpack report:
Top 5 Timed Events
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ % Total
Event Waits Time (s) Ela Time
log file sync 349,713 215,674 74.13
db file sequential read 16,955,622 31,342 10.77
CPU time 21,787 7.49
direct path read (lob) 92,762 8,910 3.06
db file scattered read 4,335,034 4,439 1.53
Avg
Total Wait wait Waits
Event Waits Timeouts Time (s) (ms) /txn
log file sync 349,713 150,785 215,674 617 1.8
db file sequential read 16,955,622 0 31,342 2 85.9
I hope the above is readable. I'm concerned with the very high number of Waits and Timeouts, particulary around the log file sync event. From reading around I suspect that the disk our redo log sits on isn't fast enough.
1) Is this conclusion correct, are these timeouts excessively high (70% seems high...)?
2) I see high waits on almost every other event (but not timeouts), is this pointing towards an incorrect database database setup (give our very high loads of 160 executes second?
Any help would be much appreciated.
JonathanTop 5 Timed Events
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ % Total
Event Waits Time (s) Ela Time
log file sync 349,713 215,674 74.13
db file sequential read 16,955,622 31,342 10.77
CPU time 21,787 7.49
direct path read (lob) 92,762 8,910 3.06
db file scattered read 4,335,034 4,439 1.53
Avg
Total Wait wait Waits
Event Waits Timeouts Time (s) (ms) /txn
log file sync 349,713 150,785 215,674 617 1.8
db file sequential read 16,955,622 0 31,342 2 85.9What's the time frame of this report on?
It looks like your disk storage can't keep up with the volume of I/O requests from your database.
The first few thing need to look at, what're IO intensive SQLs in your database. Are these SQLs doing unnecessary full table scan?
Find out the hot blocks and the objects they belong.
Check v$session_wait view.
Is there any other suspicious activity going on in your Server ? Like other program other than Oracle doing high IO activities? Are there any core dump going on? -
A suggestion about statspack...
Hi ,
I need a suggestion in statspack and sql tuning/db performance when an application runs......
Imagine that I run some forms/reports e.t.c. developed with Developer Suite 10.2 , say form1 , form2 , form3 , form4 .... form15 in a time of 10 minutes...
Next examining the statpack report , i try to alter a db parameter let's say DB_CACHE_SIZE ......
Should I run exactly the same forms (form1 , form2 , form3 , form4 .... form15) in about 10 minutes and compare the two statspack report... or should I run other forms in the same (or about the same) amount of time?????
Something else.... Which is best of the following.. to alter one - by - one db parameter and compare the new statspack report to the older or alter two,three... db parameters at once and compare the new statspack report to the older....one.
Thanks , a lot
SimonClick here and fill out the form.
(40845) -
hi masters.,
this is egarding index management. i am facing the problem regarding one sql query with union and order by clause.
when i remove order by clause, the query runs faster,than with order by clause.
is this the problem regarding index????
i know that indexes rarely need rebuild,thats why i am thinking of coalesce.is this the right decision??
what may be the problem else????
i am using oracle 9i. and i dont have statpack report coz the client is offshore.\
thanks and regards
VDVikrant,
Index is not picked by order by clause. Index entries are already sorted. See here a demo where I have used the index in a column.If I give order by clause, I explicitly get a Sort Order By in the plan.
Connected to:
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.6.0 - Production
With the Partitioning, Oracle Label Security, OLAP, Data Mining,
Oracle Database Vault and Real Application Testing options
SQL> create table sampletable as select * from scott.emp;
Table created.
SQL> create index idx on sampletable(empno);
Index created.
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gaher_table_stats(
BEGIN dbms_stats.gaher_table_stats(; END;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-06550: line 1, column 36:
PLS-00103: Encountered the symbol ";" when expecting one of the following:
( ) - + case mod new not null <an identifier>
<a double-quoted delimited-identifier> <a bind variable>
table continue avg count current exists max min prior sql
stddev sum variance execute multiset the both leading
trailing forall merge year month day hour minute second
timezone_hour timezone_minute timezone_region timezone_abbr
time timestamp interval date
<a string literal with character set specification>
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gaher_table_stats('AMAN','SAMPLETABLE');
BEGIN dbms_stats.gaher_table_stats('AMAN','SAMPLETABLE'); END;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-06550: line 1, column 18:
PLS-00302: component 'GAHER_TABLE_STATS' must be declared
ORA-06550: line 1, column 7:
PL/SQL: Statement ignored
SQL> exec dbms_stats.gather_table_stats('AMAN','SAMPLETABLE');
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> set autot trace exp
SQL> select * from sampletable order by empno;
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 5644182
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time
|
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 14 | 504 | 4 (25)| 00:00:01
|
| 1 | SORT ORDER BY | | 14 | 504 | 4 (25)| 00:00:01
|
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS FULL| SAMPLETABLE | 14 | 504 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01
|
SQL> select * from sampletable order by empno where empno in (7369,7422);
select * from sampletable order by empno where empno in (7369,7422)
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00933: SQL command not properly ended
SQL> select * from sampletable where empno in (7369,7422);
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 3966318501
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)
| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 2 | 72 | 1 (0)
| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | INLIST ITERATOR | | | |
| |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| SAMPLETABLE | 2 | 72 | 1 (0)
| 00:00:01 |
|* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX | 2 | | 0 (0)
| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
3 - access("EMPNO"=7369 OR "EMPNO"=7422)
SQL> select * from sampletable where empno in (7369,7422) order by empno;
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 3966318501
| Id | Operation | Name | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)
| Time |
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | | 2 | 72 | 1 (0)
| 00:00:01 |
| 1 | INLIST ITERATOR | | | |
| |
| 2 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| SAMPLETABLE | 2 | 72 | 1 (0)
| 00:00:01 |
|* 3 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | IDX | 2 | | 0 (0)
| 00:00:01 |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
3 - access("EMPNO"=7369 OR "EMPNO"=7422)
SQL>The point that I was making is that it may be happening that you are doing an over sort sort of thing which is causing the query to be slow. Using index for returning rows in the ordered manner is not a good thing as Oracle always say that for a guaranteed ordered result, one must use an order by clause. So either you can choose to remove the order by clause or can choose to rewrite the query without using the Union operator.
But these all are just guess works. Its not possible to say what's happening specifically in your case as long as you don't post the plan for your query both,with and without the use of index.
HTH
Aman.... -
Hi,
I am getting following in my statspack report for one of the server.
PL/SQL lock timer
direct path write
direct path read
Any tips how can I investigate.
Regards,
Umairdirect path write/read is sorting in temporary space (ussually).
Try to increase sort_area_size
(You can find in your statpack report quantity of sorts in memory and on the disk.) -
My statpack report say:
CPU Elapsd
Physical Reads Executions Reads per Exec %Total Time (s) Time (s) Hash Value
INSERT INTO log_mov ( MOV_institution_id, MOV_local_date, MOV_lo
cal_time, MOV_trx_code, MOV_trace_num, MOV_access_id, MOV_msg_ty
pe, MOV_debit_credit_reason, MOV_debit_credit_descr, MOV_trx_act
ion_code, MOV_pure_action, MOV_transmition_time, MOV_acq_busines
s_date, MOV_terminal_id, MOV_ref_num, MOV_term_unit, MOV_channel
9,082 181 50.2 1.4 0.81 61.75 246240137
My question:
This Insert delay 61 sec?
Why?
Thanks
Greetings
JuanThe data is accumulated.
So it took 61 secs to insert 181 records.
Whether that is slow? Who can tell?
You didn't post a version. Why?
You didn't post a platform. Why?
You didn't post data about file statistics. Why?
You didn't post the report properly formatted. Why?
Sybrand Bakker
Senior Oracle DBA -
Hi,
this is Top 5 Timed Events in statpack report :
Top 5 Timed Events
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ % Total
Event Waits Time (s) Call Time
CPU time 122 91.65
db file sequential read 1,571 2 1.61
db file scattered read 1,174 2 1.59
log file sequential read 342 2 1.39
control file parallel write 450 2 1.39
Wait Events DB/Inst: AKI1/AKI1 Snaps: 5-6but in my statpack report I have not the following two lines :
db file sequential read 1,571 2 1.61
db file scattered read 1,174 2 1.59Which collect level should I chose for my snapshot to have them ?
Many thanks.db file sequential read
1,571 2
1.61
le scattered read 1,174
2 1.59 ich collect level should I chose for my snapshot to
have them ?If these two events are in top 5 they will be in the list.
You should check Oracle document,
Using Statspack
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B10501_01/server.920/a96533/statspac.htm#34837 -
Hi,
Are there any differences between Running Workload Repository Reports Using Enterprise Manager and Running Workload Repository Reports Using SQL Scripts? further more what roles and rights do I need to run Workload Repository Reports Using SQL Scripts? Lastly what is difference between statspsck and awr? Which is better?
Adithhi,
if your where to run a statpack report and an awr report from sql you would see very little difference between them as far as I have seen. there must however be some benefits for awr as this is the way that Oracle is going. As far as I am aware you need no special privilege to run awr.
rgds
alan -
Re: Column is not getting displayed in the BI report
Hello Gurus,
I have developed a BI report with more number of parameters.
Case 1:
When i run my report , I am able to see data for particular condition but one column doesn't show any thing. All the rows in the column are blank.
Case 2
I tried to put the blank column as parameter, The Program works with out displaying that column data.
I am not sure where it is going wrong. I tried running the code in toad and i am able to see the data.
I have checked the code, Parameter description, length, Template and data definition.
Please help.
Thanks,
SreekanthHi ,
For that column did u changed any alias name in the query...
check ur template once by loading the xml data...
check that column form field that matches with the xml tag or not..
Thanks,
Ananth
Maybe you are looking for
-
Why does iTunes Store stop working when I try to view a certain category?
When I go to the iTunes store, I try to browse through the different apps. For example, I will click on "Entertainment" then on "Top Free Apps" then it will show a blank screen then my computer will say iTunes is not responding and shuts off. What ca
-
Session Failed: The Terminal Services license does not match this client
We have had some issues recently with specific OSX Clients accessing SGD remotely. The above message appears in a connection progress dialog box and the user is no longer able to login i have been given some information from a colleague about the tsc
-
Download to multiple excel sheets in the backgraoud
Hi, I am trying to download data into multiple excel sheets in the background. I was able to create comma delimited csv file in the server, which can be opened as excel file. This is good when it does not have more that one worksheets. I have three i
-
My feeds are updating but the iTunes store has not updated
I put my rss feed up on feedburner and all my feeds have updated but the iTunes store has not updated. I was wondering if there a simple explanation for it. Subscribers to the podcast have gotten the most recent update but the store hasn't reflected
-
A i want to do sap abap certification plz help me what is process
hi , i am working with one MNC as an abap consultant, and i want to do certification ,and i want to know how exam and syllabus , fee , and model papers.if any one have info plz help. thanking u ,