Storage Location by Plant

Hi,
I need some advice from functional perpspective. Is there a T-code where I can view storage location by multiple plant? Appreciate your advice. Thanks
Rick

Hello,
As per standard SAP, one storage location can be assinged to one plant only not multiple plants.
Ex. SL - 0001 eixst only under Plant - 1000. The same SL 0001 exist in some other plant - 2000, that is not the same one, the address or location should be different.
I hope understand my point.
You can check the same in Table: T001L in R/3 system.
Regards,
Suneel Kumar.

Similar Messages

Storage Locations for Plant

Hi
In application (no access to SPRO), where can I find the storage locations which assigned to a particular plant.
Any Tcode..
regards
RG

You can check in any MM transaction code like in MMBE or in MB52 or in MB51 or in MM03....etc.
In the selection screen of MMBE please go to storage location field and press F4.
Now system will display all storage location with plant and if you wants to see all storage locations belongs to only one plant,in the out put of this field u can enter the specific plant and it will display all storage location for that plant.
I hope it will help.

Stock transfer between Plant/Storage location to Plant/Storage location

Dear Experts,
This is a MM component of SAP Retail.
We have 4 brands ( Plants of type B, Plants of type C etc) that needs inventory from the same Distribution center (Plant A) for some common products. Here the direction is to prioritize the inventory per brand. The requirement is one brand should not take the inventory of the other brand.
To overcome this problem , the solution proposed is to have different storage location for different brands in the same DC.
When we run replenishment planning for the brands and do a ATP check, the availability check should consider only the one issuing storage location in the DC which we allocated for the brand.
I do see the following set up in SPRO and I have done the following.
Step1: Activate Stock Transfer between Storage Locations SPRO->Material Management->Purchasing->Purchase Order->set up stock transport order->set up stock transport order between storage locations-> u2018Activate Stock transfer between storage locationsu2019
Step2: Assign Delivery Type and checking rule according to storage
SPRO->Material Management->Purchasing->Purchase Order->set up stock transport order->set up stock transport order between storage locations->Assign Delivery Type and Checking Rule According to Storage
Step3: Define Shipping Data for Stock Transfer between Storage Locations
SPRO ->Material Management ->Purchasing ->Purchase Order ->set up stock transport order ->set up stock transport order between storage locations -> Define Shipping Data for Stock Transfers between Storage Locations 
Step4: Define Rule for Determination off Shipping Point SPRO->Material Management->Purchasing->Purchase Order->set up stock transport order->set up stock transport order between storage locations -> Set-up Storage-Location u2013dependent shipping point determination->Define rule for determination of shipping point
Step5: Shipping Point Assignment According to Storage Location
SPRO->Material Management->Purchasing->Purchase Order->set up stock transport order->set up stock transport order between storage locations-> Set-up Storage-Location u2013dependent shipping point determination-> Assign Shipping Points According to Storage Location
Question.No:1- After completing the above set up in me21n, the issuing storage location field is greyed out. I am not able to enter any value here. Can you please help.
Question.No:2
I do see the following setting.
Under IMG ---> Material Management ---> Purchasing --> Purchase Order --> Set up Stock Transport Order -->Business Add-In for Determination of Issuing Storage Location
Display the IMPLEMENTATION
Double click on the method GET_SUPPLYING_SL
Click the Execute button
Click the detail button on IF_EX_MD_EXT_SUP
Execute GET_SUPPLYING_SL
There is a prerequisite for this BADI .I have done those things.What i dont understand is where to force the combination of supplying site/issuing stor.loc/receiving site/receiving stor.loc
Kindly provide your inputs.
Thanks,
Vasanthan

Dear,
Have You configure MRP in second plant (where you want to transport the Material).
Please try with this and do again Po for stock transport.
Regards
Piyush Patel

Approval for storage location to storage location or plant to plant movemen

Hi all,
Our client's requirement is when goods transfer from the storage location to storage location with movement type 311 or plant to plant with movement type 301, untill & unless the authorised person at the receiving end approves it, the movement should not be happened?
How to map this? Any release strategy?
Thanks in advance.
SmanS

You can map the process in SAP using 2 step stock transfers.
Storage location 1 313 movement type - it will be in transit until you do receiving in the receiving storage location 2 using movement type 315
Similarly for plant to plant movement type 301 and 305.
There is no customization available in SAP to do this with the single step stock transfers that you are currently using.
Thanks and Regards,
Maheshwari

Change storage location and plant for Return Delivery (outbound)

Hi,
I'm trying to achieve the following:
Sales orders contained the 'normal' plant. Whenever a return delivery is created it should default the plant to a 'return delivery plant / storage location'. I've looked in to this and it seems we've got multiple options, however i would like to check:
- Implement V02V0002 user-exit and link with 'return' movement type. Will this ensure plant change aswell?
- Use standard RETA rule and define ?situations?. Could somebody clearify whether we can achieve our goal with this: Change plant and storage location?
Any suggestions to achieve the above are very much appreciated.
Note: Material contains both views for 'return plant/storage location' and 'normal plant/storage location'.
System is R/3 4.6c with IS Retail activated.
Kind regards,
Tim

Hi,
The delivery is created against/follow-on a sales order / subscription order / invoice. I don't think we use/have a 'return sales order'. Yes, we only use 1 plant / storage location for the returns of goods.
To sum it up:
- Implement badi/user-exit ensuring that the plant is changed/defaulted in to our 'returns plant' for return documents.
- Configure storage location via 'shipping condition'.
Correct?
Ps. I don't think we'll achieve changing the plant via configuring a shipping condition for our return document type. As the plant from the sales order doesn't match with the shipping condition it won't be taken in to account? And yes: It is mandatory/requirement to change the plant for customer return documents.
Thank you for your inputs.
Kind regards,
Tim

A query on Storage location of plant

I have maintained wrong storage location in MM master for a particlar plant. Now i need to delete the storage location of that particular plant. Kindly guide.

Hi,
Try this:
Select *
from(
SELECT T0.[DocNum] as #,t0.cardcode as C, t0.docdate
FROM ORDR T0
WHERE T0.[DocStatus] = 'o' and T0.[DocDate] = CONVERT(VARCHAR(10), DATEADD(s,-1,DATEADD(mm, DATEDIFF(m,0,getdate())-1,0)),10) OR T0.[DocDate] = CONVERT(VARCHAR(10), DATEADD(s,-1,DATEADD(mm, DATEDIFF(m,0,getdate())-2,0)),10) or T0.[DocDate] = CONVERT(VARCHAR(10), DATEADD(s,-1,DATEADD(mm, DATEDIFF(m,0,getdate())-3,0)),10) or T0.[DocDate] = CONVERT(VARCHAR(10), DATEADD(s,-1,DATEADD(mm, DATEDIFF(m,0,getdate())-4,0)),10) or T0.[DocDate] = CONVERT(VARCHAR(10), DATEADD(s,-1,DATEADD(mm, DATEDIFF(m,0,getdate())-5,0)),10) or T0.[DocDate] = CONVERT(VARCHAR(10), DATEADD(s,-1,DATEADD(mm, DATEDIFF(m,0,getdate())-6,0)),10) or T0.[DocDate] = CONVERT(VARCHAR(10), DATEADD(s,-1,DATEADD(mm, DATEDIFF(m,0,getdate())-7,0)),10)
group by t0.cardcode,docdate,T0.[DocNum]) S
pivot
(count(#) for c in([cvt01],[cvt02],[cvt03],[cvt04],[cvt05],[cvt06],[cvt07],[cvt08],[cvt12])) P
Note: Replace Cvt01,02...with your customer code.
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan

Storage Locations Vs Plants

Dear Experts,
An appealing business case is to move to a world where locations currently set-up as "plants" (inventory managed but necessarily WM managed), can be mapped as "overflow" storage" locations as that indeed is the physical "truth".
Now given I am talking of a productive system with SD,MM,PP, LE, WMS, APO SNP, CTM are implemented, what all considerations do I need to keep in mind before fiddling with such a drastic change..
I can only think of some repurcussions..basis general and intuitive understanding of ECC-APO integration, but nevertheless this is a major change that needs systematic evaluation of all side effects. The case for benefits is simplicity, ease of planning, reducing number of "plannable" locations (on which MRP and CTM - supply distribution is run)
Example of the supply chain model
- I have a "site" that has 10 plants making 50 products not necesarily unique. e.g. 2 plants making same stuff, 2 others making some other stuff, one dedicated to one material etc. (no case of one plant making 2 products)
-I have storage locations that are currently (incorrectly) are used to manage "quality" status of stocks e.g. 0001 means good, 0002 means on hold, 0003 means near expired etc.
-I have WMS warehouses mappping to plants. not necessarily unique e.g. 5 plants and 3 storage locations is one warehouse and another 5 plants and 3 stoarge location is another warehouse. The need for warehouse is based on material groups needing different ambient stoarge conditions
-I have CTM implemented with quotas, rules and lanes defined from these plants to customer locatons.
-I have MRP being done on manufacturing plants (for procurement) with some storage locations being excluded
-I have SNP planning (for deployment) in supply network based on net requirements at plants (distribution centers)
-I have distribution plants with its own storage locations using stor locs to managae quality status of stocks
-I hire third party warehouses as needed and also defined as plants (DC's) that also has storage locations for managing quality status.
I am looking forward to some feelers and scare factors that such a replacement of plants to storage locations may entail. Obviously it means a lot of things.. changes to valution, WMS,pegging, CTM results etc.
Let me know if you want me to elaborate more on business context. Also please re-assure if such a change to a productive system is at all advisable plus any SAP warnings.. I browsed but didnt find much on such a "re-engineering" exercise.
Regards,
Loknath

Dear,
You can create more plants by the same way I have created plant 2001.
- Tcode SPRO (IMG Customizing)
> Enterprise Structure
>> Definition
>>> Plant Maintenance
>>>> Maintain maintenance planning plant
And the storage locations:
- Tcode SPRO (IMG Customizing)
> Enterprise Structure
>> Definition
>>> Materials Management
>>>> Maintain storage location
Best regards,
Eduardo Junior

List the storage location for all the plants

Hello
How could I list all the storage locations of all the plants in single view.
I have tried V_T001L but it is go plant by plant level.
rgds
Nile.Y

Hello,
Following link may help you.
List of Storage Locations by Plant
BR,
Tushar

Create Plant or just separate Storage Location

I am trying to determine where the magical line is to decide whether to establish a separate address location as a different plant or location. My example is not very complex. It is a satellite production location that produces products for use as raw materials for another production facility that assembles and sells the final product. The satellite location will have a separate cost center and will use activity rates and costing sheets for overhead recovery. My inclination is to set the satellite facility as a plant but supply Chain team sees this as overkill and would rather make it simply a storage locations.
Can someone provide a white paper or list of positives and negatives to storage location versus plant? I know some things might involve the following:
1-If valuation of products are different or may at some point involve different values by location, a plant is needed.
2-If products are sold directly from location, plant would make more sense.
3-If inventroy is transferred between locations with differing addresses, various tax and bank reporting could necessitate the use of separate plants.
4-When manufacturing activities exist, a plant is logical.
5-If all purchasing is performed at a central location, a separate plant may not be required for this purpose.
My existing dilemma relates to the fact that we use costing sheets by plant. Without a separate plant, using different storage locations forces me to use the Material Origin Group to dileneate the extra location if I don't want to use the plant based overhead rates. This seems like a violation of best practice and proper use of SAP.

Hi
If you define satellite production location as Storage location you can not do profitable analysis at this unit. My suggestion is activate MRP area at storage location level. So that satellite production unit is treated as separate entity under the same Plant. This will just help you to do the Supply chain activities (purchasing, Sale, Prod and STO) at MRP area level. But Profitability analysis still can be done at Plant level only.
This will solve your point numbers 2, 3, and 4.For material valuation (Point number -1) I think you have to go for split valuation.
Regards,
Velmurugan S

Default Plant and storage location for components in MFBF

Hi,
I have 2 plants 1000-procurement plant and 2000- production plant. I am using special procurement key 70( Withdrawal from alternative plant from 1000 to 2000) for components in Plant 2000. The requirements for the components are transferred from 2000 plant to 1000 plant. The 1000 plant run MRP for the dependent requirements and procure the materials and transferred to the production storage location in Plant 2000.The raw materials are purchased in plant 1000 and transferred to Plant 2000 production storage location based on the manual reservations created with movement type 301. This is fine.
But when I do backflush in MFBF the plant and storage location for the components issue are displayed as plant 1000 which is the procurement plant and the production storage location in plant 2000-production plant location. In the BOM the production storage location is production storage location of plant 2000. Since we use the special procurement key system defaults the plant as 1000(procurement plant) insteadd of 2000(production plant). can we make this plant default to the production plant 2000 as default in the MFBF goods issue screen.
thanks and regards
Murugesan

Hi MURUGESAN !
      Can you give me some information more in Special Procument Configure in plant 2000 like:
          - Procurement type (maybe F)
          - Special procurement (Maybe U)
          - Plant (Maybe 1000).
          - Issuing plant (maybe 2000)
       We will check together.
       Regards,
      Tony

Material deletion at plant and storage location deletion at plant

hI EXPERT,
We are going to extend the materials in plant A to plant B and C. So we will extend it using LSMW. After extending, we need to delete the materials in plant A and storage location in plant A. How can we do that? Please explain step by step.
Thanks

Hi,
If you want to delete material at storage location level
Enter MM17
Select table MARD
Select fields tab
find MARD-LVORM
Execute (F8)
Enter list of materials
Enter plant
enter storage location.
tick the field lvorm(carry out mass change)

Storage Location level ATP check with CRM

Hi:
I am on an implemenation where the integration is between CRM, EWM and GATP. So, consider the situation where the sales order check is done through CRM and a call to GATP is made.
Some background on supply
EWM would like to receive the goods into storage location ROD (Received On Dock) and then do a movement type to move it to storage location AFS (Available For Sale). The sales orders should consider only the supply from storage location AFS and not ROD.
First question is, is it possible to do a storage location level determination in CRM? I don't think so but wanted to confirm. The reason is because even a plant determination is not possible in CRM when you integrate with GATP (the plant is determined through Rules).
Now, suppose that we have determined the storage location called AFS (in gATP through enhancement) and will do an ATP only at that level in GATP. Suppose that the first plant that will be checked is Plant A and then based on the location determination procedure, the next plant that will be checked is Plant B. When the system checks supply at Plant B, then the question is this: will it still check only at storage location AFS in Plant B or will it check at the plant level? The requirement will be to check at the same storage location level (which means that whatever process we used to determine the storage location at Plant A has to be followed for Plant B also).
One option that can be considered is to check at the Storage Location MRP Area level (there seems to be better support for RBA and Storage Location MRP Area than just storage location). See SAP Note 412314. But this is also complicated.
Another option is to not check at the storage location level but represent the various stocks with stock types (stock type ROD and stock type AFS) and only the stock type AFS will be used in the list of ATP categories.
Please share any experience that you may have in this.
Thanks,

Hi Satish,
In my project also we had this requirement to determine the correct Storage location after plant has been determined by using rules.
What we did is as follows:
- We created a Z table which had entries for all plants and preferred storage locations for those plant (only one entry per plant) in your case it will be like:
Plant A - AFC
Plant B - AFC
Plant C - AFC
- We used a ATP user exit in APO to get the storage location of source plant ( which was determined in APO via rules) from the Z table.
I hope this helps.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Anupam
Edited by: Anupam Sengar on Dec 20, 2011 12:03 AM

Storage Location Level ATP check through CRM

Hi:
I am on an implemenation where the integration is between CRM, EWM and GATP. So, consider the situation where the sales order check is done through CRM and a call to GATP is made.
Some background on supply
EWM would like to receive the goods into storage location ROD (Received On Dock) and then do a movement type to move it to storage location AFS (Available For Sale). The sales orders should consider only the supply from storage location AFS and not ROD.
First question is, is it possible to do a storage location level determination in CRM? I don't think so but wanted to confirm. The reason is because even a plant determination is not possible in CRM when you integrate with GATP (the plant is determined through Rules).
Now, suppose that we have determined the storage location called AFS (in gATP through enhancement) and will do an ATP only at that level in GATP. Suppose that the first plant that will be checked is Plant A and then based on the location determination procedure, the next plant that will be checked is Plant B. When the system checks supply at Plant B, then the question is this: will it still check only at storage location AFS in Plant B or will it check at the plant level? The requirement will be to check at the same storage location level (which means that whatever process we used to determine the storage location at Plant A has to be followed for Plant B also).
One option that can be considered is to check at the Storage Location MRP Area level (there seems to be better support for RBA and Storage Location MRP Area than just storage location). See SAP Note 412314. But this is also complicated.
Another option is to not check at the storage location level but represent the various stocks with stock types (stock type ROD and stock type AFS) and only the stock type AFS will be used in the list of ATP categories.
Please share any experience that you may have in this.
Thanks,
Satish

Hi Satish,
In my project also we had this requirement to determine the correct Storage location after plant has been determined by using rules.
What we did is as follows:
- We created a Z table which had entries for all plants and preferred storage locations for those plant (only one entry per plant) in your case it will be like:
Plant A - AFC
Plant B - AFC
Plant C - AFC
- We used a ATP user exit in APO to get the storage location of source plant ( which was determined in APO via rules) from the Z table.
I hope this helps.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Anupam
Edited by: Anupam Sengar on Dec 20, 2011 12:03 AM

Report by month with Valuated stock and special stock by storage location

Dear All,
I need a report similar to MCBE with stock level (including "storage loc/batch Stock" plus "special stock(Q)") by plant and storage location.
I try it with MCBE tcode, but i only get "storage loc/batch Stock" in column named valuated stock. Also I can obtain that information in MB5B tcode, but I cannot get data by storage location, only plant.
Does anyone know how can solve it?
Thanks in advance,
Sebastiá

Hi,
Use MC.9 T.code.
click on "switch drilldown" and select storage location.
Regards
Hari

Need to display the Stock Values at storage location level - 0IC_C03

Hi All,
I am developing Stock Movent Report on 0IC_C03 - Material Stocks/Movements.
I have more than one storage location for plant. Stock quantities are calculating at storage location level and Stock Values are calculating at plant level.
I have no issues with quantities. Only problem with Values.
2LIS_03_UM is not picking the starage location, so that the revaualtion values are falling under unassigned nodes. When i set filter on storage location these values were not showing as they are under un assigned nodes (#).
I want to get the Stock Quantity and Stock Values at Storage location level in my report.
I found that soulution for that is Applying SAP Note : How to Realize summarized display of stock values on storage
I have done development as per the document. But when i run the Query it is going to debug mode first and then it saying This program cannot display the webpage
Can any one faced the same situation, Please help me if so.
Thanks in Advance.
Gopal N

Hi Sachein,
I am getting this An exception(CX_RSR_PROPAGATE_X) occured when debugging, and then it leads to next screen saying that:
This program cannot display the webpage
   Most likely causes:
You are not connected to the Internet.
The website is encountering problems.
There might be a typing error in the address.
   What you can try:
     Check your Internet connection. Try visiting another website to make sure you are connected.
     Retype the address.
     Go back to the previous page.
     More information
Please let me know you need any more information.
Thanks in Advance
Gopal N

Storage Location by Plant

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for