Storage not suitable for interface

In co11, I encountered this error. What would cause this? How do I fix this?

Hi,
Probably, the Storage type is not allowed for Mixed storage.
Contact your WM Partner.
Regards,
Siva

Similar Messages

Serial Number not suitable for movment

Dear Friends,
while doing PGI through movement type-601 we are getting error message "Stock Data for serial number xxxxx not suitable for movement"
please suggest.
thanks

Hi,
While doing PGI give the serial number which is assigned to your exsisting in stock.
Go To MMBE
and see which valuation stock and wich storage location you want to issue and righ click and check the equipment/serial number in system and give the appropriate serial number available in stock

"error: thread-local storage not supported for this target"

I have a program that uses the __thread specifier, to be run on a Solaris 9/UltraSprac.
I am not able to compile it using gcc 3.4.4 or 4.0.4, it emits the msg "error: thread-local storage not supported for this target".
xz@gamera% gcc -v -Wall -D_REENTRANT -c -o func_stack.o func_stack.c
Reading specs from /opt/gcc/3.4.4/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.4/specs
Configured with: ../srcdir/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc/3.4.4 --disable-nls
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.4.4
/opt/gcc/3.4.4/libexec/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.4/cc1 -quiet -v -D_REENTRANT -DMESS func_stack.c -quiet -dumpbase func_stack.c -mcpu=v7 -auxbase-strip func_stack.o -Wall -version -o /var/tmp//cc0poHSN.s
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/local/include"
ignoring nonexistent directory "/opt/gcc/3.4.4/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.4/../../../../sparc-sun-solaris2.8/include"
#include "..." search starts here:
#include <...> search starts here:
/opt/gcc/3.4.4/include
/opt/gcc/3.4.4/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.4/include
/usr/include
End of search list.
GNU C version 3.4.4 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8)
        compiled by GNU C version 3.4.4.
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072
func_stack.c:16: error: thread-local storage not supported for this target
func_stack.c:17: error: thread-local storage not supported for this target
func_stack.c:19: error: thread-local storage not supported for this target
xs@gamera% gcc -v -D_REENTRANT -c -o func_stack.o func_stack.c
Using built-in specs.
Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.9
Configured with: /net/clpt-v490-0/export/data/bldmstr/20070711_mars_gcc/src/configure --prefix=/usr/sfw --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --enable-checking=release --disable-libmudflap --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --with-cpu=v9 --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --without-gnu-ld
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.0.4 (gccfss)
/pkg/gcc/4.0.4/bin/../libexec/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/cc1 -quiet -v -I. -iprefix /pkg/gcc/4.0.4/bin/../lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/ -D__sparcv8 -D_REENTRANT -DMESS func_stack.c -quiet -dumpbase func_stack.c -mcpu=v9 -auxbase-strip func_stack.o -version -m32 -o /tmp/ccjsdswh.s -r /tmp/cc2w4ZRo.ir
ignoring nonexistent directory "/pkg/gcc/4.0.4/bin/../lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/../../../../sparc-sun-solaris2.9/include"
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/local/include"
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/sfw/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/include"
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/sfw/lib/../sparc-sun-solaris2.9/include"
#include "..." search starts here:
#include <...> search starts here:
/pkg/gcc/4.0.4/bin/../lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/include
/usr/sfw/include
/usr/include
End of search list.
GNU C version 4.0.4 (gccfss) (sparc-sun-solaris2.9)
        compiled by GNU C version 4.0.4 (gccfss).
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072
func_stack.c:16: error: thread-local storage not supported for this target
func_stack.c:17: error: thread-local storage not supported for this target
func_stack.c:19: error: thread-local storage not supported for this targetJust as comparison, the corresponding output of compiling another file which does not have __thread declaration is as follows:
xz@gamera% gcc -v -Wall -D_REENTRANT -c -o common.o common.c
Reading specs from /opt/gcc/3.4.4/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.4/specs
Configured with: ../srcdir/configure --prefix=/opt/gcc/3.4.4 --disable-nls
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.4.4
/opt/gcc/3.4.4/libexec/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.4/cc1 -quiet -v -D_REENTRANT -DMESS common.c -quiet -dumpbase common.c -mcpu=v7 -auxbase-strip common.o -Wall -version -o /var/tmp//cc4VxrLz.s
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/local/include"
ignoring nonexistent directory "/opt/gcc/3.4.4/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.4/../../../../sparc-sun-solaris2.8/include"
#include "..." search starts here:
#include <...> search starts here:
/opt/gcc/3.4.4/include
/opt/gcc/3.4.4/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.4.4/include
/usr/include
End of search list.
GNU C version 3.4.4 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8)
        compiled by GNU C version 3.4.4.
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072
/usr/ccs/bin/as -V -Qy -s -xarch=v8 -o common.o /var/tmp//cc4VxrLz.s
/usr/ccs/bin/as: Sun WorkShop 6 update 2 Compiler Common 6.2 Solaris_9_CBE 2001/04/02Note that the last 2 lines seem to suggest that a Sun assembler is used as the back-end of gcc. I am not sure whether the failure to compile the first file (with __thread) was due to the incompatibility of this Sun assembler. In the first case, the error msg was emitted before these 2 lines are printed.
I further read a post about gcc 3.3.3's inability to compile code that has __thread in it, on a HP-UX 11.11: http://forums12.itrc.hp.com/service/forums/questionanswer.do?admit=109447627+1216595175060+28353475&threadId=1148976 The conclusion seems to suggest that "the 2.17 GNU assembler did not support thread local storage" and gcc sees that and thus disallows TLS.
If the assembler is the culprit, then does anyone know whether this "Sun WorkShop 6 update 2" assembler in my installation can work with TLS? And how come a Sun assembler becomes the back-end of gcc? I read that gas (the GNU assembler) is the default backend of gcc. (How) can one specify the assembler to be used for gcc?
As an aside, I am able to compile my file on this same Solaris 9/UltraSparc platform using the Sun Studio 12 C Compiler:
xz@gamera% cc -V -# -D_REENTRANT -c -o func_stack.o func_stack.c
cc: Sun C 5.9 SunOS_sparc Patch 124867-01 2007/07/12
### Note: NLSPATH = /pkg/SUNWspro/12/prod/bin/../lib/locale/%L/LC_MESSAGES/%N.cat:/pkg/SUNWspro/12/prod/bin/../../lib/locale/%L/LC_MESSAGES/%N.cat
###     command line files and options (expanded):
### -c -D_REENTRANT -V func_stack.c -o func_stack.o
/pkg/SUNWspro/12/prod/bin/acomp -xldscope=global -i func_stack.c -y-fbe -y/pkg/SUNWspro/12/prod/bin/fbe -y-xarch=generic -y-xmemalign=8i -y-o -yfunc_stack.o -y-verbose -y-xthreadvar=no%dynamic -y-comdat -xdbggen=no%stabs+dwarf2+usedonly -V -D_REENTRANT -m32 -fparam_ir -Qy -D__SunOS_5_9 -D__SUNPRO_C=0x590 -D__SVR4 -D__sun -D__SunOS -D__unix -D__sparc -D__BUILTIN_VA_ARG_INCR -D__C99FEATURES__ -Xa -D__PRAGMA_REDEFINE_EXTNAME -Dunix -Dsun -Dsparc -D__RESTRICT -xc99=%all,no%lib -D__FLT_EVAL_METHOD__=0 -I/pkg/SUNWspro/12/prod/include/cc "-g/pkg/SUNWspro/12/prod/bin/cc -V -D_REENTRANT -c -o func_stack.o " -fsimple=0 -D__SUN_PREFETCH -destination_ir=yabe
acomp: Sun C 5.9 SunOS_sparc Patch 124867-01 2007/07/12Interestingly, the output no longer mentions the "/usr/ccs/bin/as: Sun WorkShop 6 update 2" assembler.

Just as another comparison, I compiled a file without __thread on the Solaris 9/UltraSparc platform using gcc 4.0.4. Not surprisingly it worked. But I no longer see the mention of the Sun assembler as in the case of gcc 3.4.4. Nor did I see the mention of "GNU assembler" as in the case of gcc 4.0.4/Solaris 10/x86. Instead, I saw something called "iropt" and "cg". Does anyone know what they are?
xz@gamera% gcc -v -Wall -D_REENTRANT -c -o common.o common.c
Using built-in specs.
Target: sparc-sun-solaris2.9
Configured with: /net/clpt-v490-0/export/data/bldmstr/20070711_mars_gcc/src/configure --prefix=/usr/sfw --enable-shared --with-system-zlib --enable-checking=release --disable-libmudflap --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --with-cpu=v9 --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --without-gnu-ld
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.0.4 (gccfss)
/pkg/gcc/4.0.4/bin/../libexec/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/cc1 -quiet -v -iprefix /pkg/gcc/4.0.4/bin/../lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/ -D__sparcv8 -D_REENTRANT -DMESS common.c -quiet -dumpbase common.c -mcpu=v9 -auxbase-strip common.o -Wall -version -m32 -o /tmp/ccSGJIDD.s -r /tmp/ccKuJz76.ir
ignoring nonexistent directory "/pkg/gcc/4.0.4/bin/../lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/../../../../sparc-sun-solaris2.9/include"
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/local/include"
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/sfw/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/include"
ignoring nonexistent directory "/usr/sfw/lib/../sparc-sun-solaris2.9/include"
#include "..." search starts here:
#include <...> search starts here:
/pkg/gcc/4.0.4/bin/../lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4/include
/usr/sfw/include
/usr/include
End of search list.
GNU C version 4.0.4 (gccfss) (sparc-sun-solaris2.9)
        compiled by GNU C version 4.0.4 (gccfss).
GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param ggc-min-heapsize=131072
/pkg/gcc/4.0.4/SUNW0scgfss/4.0.4/prod/bin/iropt -F -xarch=v8plus -xchip=generic -O1 -xvector=no -xbuiltin=%none -xcache=generic -Qy -h_gcc -o /tmp/ccUl4mVM.ircg /tmp/ccKuJz76.ir -N/dev/null -is /tmp/ccSGJIDD.s
/pkg/gcc/4.0.4/SUNW0scgfss/4.0.4/prod/bin/cg -Qy -xarch=v8plus -xchip=generic -OO0 -T3 -Qiselect-C0 -Qrm:newregman:coalescing=0 -xcode=abs32 -xcache=generic -xmemalign=8i -il /pkg/gcc/4.0.4/bin/../lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.9/4.0.4//gccbuiltins.il -xvector=no -xthreadvar=no%dynamic -xbuiltin=%none -Qassembler-ounrefsym=0 -Qiselect-T0 -Qassembler-I -Qassembler-U -comdat -h_gcc -is /tmp/ccSGJIDD.s -ir /tmp/ccUl4mVM.ircg -oo common.o

MiniSAP - SE80 Prompts Error "Printer not suitable for job step..."

Hi all,
I bought an ABAP Objects book. I installed the MiniSAP. When I run SAP GUI and SE80, both with BCUSER and DDIC, it gives me error message "Printer not suitable for job step. Automatic printing not possible."
If I double-click on the message, it does not show the description of the error message, instead it displays an Internet Explorer error message "The page cannot be found."
Furthermore, the same error message, "The Page cannot be found", also appears in the area where the listbox and textbox for selecting Development Class, Program, Function Group, etc. Making these function becomes unavailabale. I cannot see the listbox and textbox in the Object Navigator. The only development class show is "$_TMP_BCUSER" (if I recall correctly). But nothing is in the development class.
How do I solve this problem?
OS: Windows XP Professional
Browser Installed: Internet Explorer and Firefox
Other info: I put incorrect IP Address in the Hosts file while installation was in progress. This created error. I then correct the IP Address in the Hosts file and resume installation. I still encountered error until I restarted my computer and resume installtion. I use IP Address 10.10.0.10.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Goh Tiam Tjai

I searched the solution in the other SDN sub forum (ABAP Programming). The following patch solves the problem.
http://www.sap-press.de/download/dateien/473/sapgui_patch.zip
Regards,
Goh Tiam Tjai

In iPhoto how do I stop files from auto resizing as they import? I don't want my files reduced to 72. The option to choose size on the export menu not suitable for up sizing, as you can't restore the quality removed?

in iPhoto how do I stop files from auto resizing as they import? I don't want my files reduced to 72. The option to choose size on the export menu not suitable for up sizing, as you can't restore the quality removed.

Short answer: They are not resizing, there is no quality lost. The dpi is only set when you decide what size you're printing at
Longer answer: Dpi means nothing in the digital world of your computer. There are no "inches" to have "dots per..." Size is measured in pixels. That's the same on your camera. It doesn't take 10 x 8 or 6 x 4 shots. It takes shots measured in megapixels. For instance 4,000 x 3,000 is a 12 megapixel camera.
Using that example, that shot from that camera has 12 million pixels. So that's how many "Dots" there are. To decide the ratio of dots per inch, you now need to decide the "inches" part. And that's printing. Print at 10 x 8 and the dpi will be 4,000/10 or about 400 dpi. At 6 x 4 then it's 4,000/6 or 660 dpi. Work the other way: Print at 300 dpi and the resulting image will be about 13 inches on the longer side.
So, your photo as a fixed number of pixels. Changing the dimensions of the print will vary the dpi, changing the dpi will vary the dimensions of the print.
For more see http://www.rideau-info.com/photos/mythdpi.html
Regards
TD

Serial Number not suitable for movement when doing goods issue or sto ?

Dear all ,
I have a issue , when doing sto or goods issue ,
i have a material code serial number profile is off physical quantity is laying 20 and my requirement is active the serial no
and assign to serial number for the material ,
Tcode is iq01 put the material , serial number and category after save when i am doing ma1a putting material ,quantity
and that serial number click on save , geting error like
Stock data of serial number 1234 not suitable for movement
when i am checking iq02 serial number is showing but checking in MMbe there is not showing
Regards
Shiv

hello,
to activate the serial numbers you first have to clear all the stock for this material (MVT 562 / 502 or other)
Than activate the serial in the material muster.
in your situation (if i understood correctly) what you need is:
1. disable the serial numbers for the material (move them to another material)
2. deactivate the serial number in the material master
3. get rid of all the stack - post it with 562 or 502
4. activate serial numbers
5. post the material back to stock - 561 / 501 - than the system will require a serial number for each unit

Stock data of serial number not suitable for movement

We have a situation where we have had to put some serialized parts on a rework production order. When we are trying to bring them back into stock, we're getting a message that says "Stock data of serial number not suitable for movement." I'm guessing that this is because this serial number had existed in stock before (since this is a rework of an existing material/serial number.) We need to receive this back into stock using this same serial number. How is that possible?
Thanks in advance for your help.
Sybil

Dear,
Please refer these threads,
Re: Removing Serial number Profile
IQ02 Shows Blocked Stock for Serial Number
Hope it will help you.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

IO231: Stock data of serial number &1 not suitable for movement

Hi experts,
I have unique problem with serialized material posting.We are having serialized managed materials which are posted to quality inspection stock.The user was able to post partial quantity to unrestricted after usage decision but when tried to post remainig quantity it is giving error 'IO231: Stock data of serial number &1 not suitable for movement".I checked serial number history in iq02 & it shows that same serial numbers were used for some order in the past which is already delivered.I am not able to understand how it allowed to post same serial numbers again for the same material and if it is normal why it is giving above error when we try to post remaining quantity?
I tried by changing serial profile in the material master with all optional fields and without stock check and equipment and try to post but its not working.
I want to somehow post material to unrestricted use from quality inspection with or without serial numbers.
I am working on 4.7 system
Can u guys help me.
Thanks & Regards,
Sachin.

Hi,
Please check this SAP Note: 213861, 1229108
From Note 213861
Release 4.0A or 4.0B:
Table T156S
Maintain the data using Transaction SM31.Flag for transport using Transaction SE16.
All entries for movement types 645 and 647 should be filled with '****' in field T156S-VRGNG.
Release 4.5A or 4.5B:
Table T156S
Maintain the data using Transaction SM31.Flag for transport using Transaction SE16.
All entries for movement types 645, 647 and 675 to 678 should be filled with '****' in field T156S-VRGNG.
Release 4.6A to 4.6C:
Table T156SY
Maintain the data using Transaction SM30 using view V_T156SY.If necessary, manually flag for transport in this transaction.
All entries for posting string references 645 or 647 should be filled in field T156SY-VRGNG_S or T156SY-VRGNG_H with '****'.
For Note 1229108
A correction instructions has given Please take help from BASIS Team....
This will solve the Problem...
Regards
GK.
Edited by: Gnana Kumar on Nov 3, 2010 7:16 AM

Stock data of serial number 90645 not suitable for Movement.

HI Friends,
We are having issue while doing return delivery for a service/Repair order, the serial number related error messages are coming.
the error messages are
1. Stock data of serial number 90645 not suitable for Movement.
2 . Serial number can not be used here.
3 termination of gods issue posting for delivery note 855222.
The following points explain the scenario..
1. The Previous and next documents are through with the post Goods receipt for the same material with different serial numbers.
2. The movemnt is 653 E
3 Client placing one service/repair order and creating return delivry against this order and assign serial number and trying to post Goods receipt.
4 The serial number profile is having Exist/ indicator for SDRE return delivery serial usage is 'optional' and Equipe' with equirement'
Robert

Hi Anybody come across this requirement.

System file not suitable for running msdos or windows files ???

Please help...
I download the itunes 6.0.5 setup.exe file.
I open it and I see a pop up with Quicktime and Itunes on it. It quickly loads and then a new application opens (a C:// black box
It quickly gets an error (16 Bit MSDOS Subsystem Box) error reads that the system file is not suitable for running msdos or window files. Close or Ignore (neither allow me to load 6.0.5
I am using windows xp

You use probably a UFS file system, right ? Then in this case, use the "-i" option with a value less as 8192. 8192 is the default value for a UFS filesystem that is between 3GB and 1 TB size.
But if you want to store 10M of files, UFS will be limited to 1M per TB : 64-bit: Support of MultiterabyteUFS File Systems (System Administration Guide: Devices and File Systems)
In this case, use instead UFS a ZFS filesystem that supports 2^48 entries !!!

On my iPhone 4s, I sent a picture via email and asked to size it down. However, it seems now that the pic stored on my iphone is now forever the smaller size which is not suitable for printing. Is there any way to get the larger size back?

On my iPhone 4s, I sent a picture via email and asked to size it down. However, it seems now that the pic stored on my iphone is now forever the smaller size which is not suitable for printing. Is there any way to get the larger size back?

sure pretty simple. make a backup of your current settings
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1766?viewlocale=en_US
then restore device from old backup you need pics off of
then import pics to computer
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT4083
you may need to save pics to camera roll first
then restore the new backup and sync pics back to phone via itunes
Peace, Clyde

Device not suitable for charging

My friends has been trying to charge his iPhone 4 however when he plugs it to the wall (using the white USB cable charger that came with the phone), he gets a message "device not suitable for charging" (something like that). It just started doing this yesterday. He shut down his phone and rebooted and still the issue remains. He also tried another cord and the same thing.
Thanks!

have you tried a different charger, or a different phone on the same charger? That would be the next step.

New connection not suitable for needs

I had total bb installed a few weeks back for my sons online gaming and ever since being installed he has had constant packet loss and dc's meaning that the line is not suitable for what he needs it for. I went ahead and called technical support and they went through the mumble jumble that I expected them to such as check master socket etc...etc.. at the end I was told the problem would be elevated and someone would be in touch, nobody got intouch and I called the cancellation department today only to be told that I'd be charged £400 if I tried to cancel and that the line speed was fine. I tried to explain that the line speed was not the problem but the quality of the line and the constant packet loss and dc's from any form of gaming.
Anyone any ideas on how I can get my problems through to someone that will actually help me, I refuse to pay £400 to cancel a service that is not working correctly.

wired or wireless. Plz post your router stats and try a ping test@ pingtest.net posting the results here
I am no expert. Correct me when I am wrong. Learning is good!

Device types are not suitable for ADS documents when printing Form16

In Form 16 , while printing the Form16 of the employee it occurs an error "Device types are not suitable for ADS documents" in the task bar.
Regards,
Ranga

Can you check
Note 1116245 - ADS Check List before sending message to SAP
and see which of the steps are not working for you?
Markus

Error: cartridge not suitable for this printer after switch off and on

HI,
I have an officejet 6310 all-in-one. After printing and switching it off and switching it back on the next day, I get the message (translated from Dutch):
catridge error:
Rightside cartridge isnot suitable for this printer
Switching it off, removing either the right-hand cartridge or even both cartridges doesn't solve this issue. Anyone has an idea how to solve this?
Thanks in advance,
Ronald.

Hi - Not sure why the other link didn't work. Here is the URL to the document:
http://h10025.www1.hp.com/ewfrf/wc/document?docname=c00831987&tmp_task=solveCategory&lc=en&dlc=en&cc...
Hope that helps.
Say Thanks by clicking the Kudos thumbs up. Please mark the post that solves your problem as an Accepted Solution so other forum users can utilize the solution.
I am an HP employee.

Storage not suitable for interface

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for