Strange email behavior...

As of today, when I click on a message that I just received, what appears in the main body is a message from some other date. In fact, if I click on any message that I received, it seems like some other random message from my mailbox appears. Has this happened to anyone else before?
Thanks!

I've never heard of this happening before. Are you running 10.4.10 as your profile states, and if so, why haven't you upgraded to 10.4.11? That should be on your list of priorities, as it provides various bug fixes and addresses other security issues. You'd also need to use Software Update to get other updates that occurred after 10.4.11 was released.
As for your particular problem, it sounds like your Mail index could be corrupted, so let's try fixing that. First, quit Mail and then go to Users/username/Library/Mail and remove the Envelop Index file to your Desktop. Next, start Mail and it will prompt you to import messages; let it do that. When it's done, check to see if you can access the correct messages in Mail when you double-click on them; if so, you can delete the Envelope Index file on your Desktop.
Mulder

Similar Messages

Strange typeover behavior in Newsfeeds

I am getting this strange intermittent behavior when create a post in the Newsfeed.
As you begin to type the text compress and it almost looks like the letters are typing over themselves
The resulting text can be posted and looks fine when posted, it some times does throw an error but the error and type over don't seem connected
It happens on all browser types and even phones and tablets

Hi,
Thank you for your post.
This is a quick note to let you know that we are performing research on this issue.
Best Regards,
Eric
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Strange ZWSREG behavior

We are in the middle of a rollout of about 300 new machines. (used sysprep in the image) The first 100 are doing something strange. They boot up get renamed and join the windows domain with their new name, but register with ZEN as the randomly generated Microsoft name. (usually someting like N-398477634379d979) I deleted the workstation object, unreged and rereged the computer, but it always reregisters with the randomly generated name. What gives? I found a TID that said this was fixed by an update on the latest desktop agent, but that I could work around it by deleting the incorrectly named object and waiting for the machine to reboot, However it still registers with the wrong name. Any ideas? Thanks.
J. Daniel Treadwell

But these are new computers. They should not have image safe data yet. I tried it, but got the same result.
Originally Posted by Craig Wilson
Try running ZISWIN -R when you unregister.
My guess is that it's pulling the old info from Image Safe Data.
Craig Wilson - MCNE, MCSE, CCNA
Novell Support Forums Volunteer Sysop
Novell does not officially monitor these forums.
Suggestions/Opinions/Statements made by me are solely my own.
These thoughts may not be shared by either Novell or any rational human.
"jtreadwell" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]..
>
> We are in the middle of a rollout of about 300 new machines. (used
> sysprep in the image) The first 100 are doing something strange. They
> boot up get renamed and join the windows domain with their new name,
> but register with ZEN as the randomly generated Microsoft name.
> (usually someting like N-398477634379d979) I deleted the workstation
> object, unreged and rereged the computer, but it always reregisters
> with the randomly generated name. What gives? I found a TID that said
> this was fixed by an update on the latest desktop agent, but that I
> could work around it by deleting the incorrectly named object and
> waiting for the machine to reboot, However it still registers with the
> wrong name. Any ideas? Thanks.
>
>
> J. Daniel Treadwell
>
>
> --
> jtreadwell
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> jtreadwell's Profile: NOVELL FORUMS - View Profile: jtreadwell
> View this thread: Strange ZWSREG behavior - NOVELL FORUMS
>

Capturing DVCAM in FCP 6.0.2 and encountering strange capture behavior

I have FCP 6.0.2 and OSX 10.5.2 and QT 7.3.1. I have been capturing several DVCAM cassettes using my Sony DSR-20 deck. Although I have done this countless times before in earlier versions of FCP, I am encountering some strange repetitive behavior. I am capturing 30 minute clips one at a time. When I use batch capture it will cue the tape up properly to the in point...and then start capturing until it gets to about 10-12 minutes in, and then capture unexpectedly stops, no dialogue box, the tape rewinds and starts capturing again from the original in point. On this second capture, the tape sails past the 10 minute mark and keeps going to the end of the 30 minute clip. It then stops, gives me the dialogue box that it has successfully captured. And it has.
But every DVCAM tape I captured today exhibited the same behavior. Capture would be successful until about about 10 minutes in, then FCP aborts (no dropped frame message, no dialogue box) rewinds the tape back to the in point, tries again, and this time succeeds with the second pass capturing the entire clip. Note at the 10 minute mark there is no scene change or no camera start/stop.
Have other users experienced this issue? And if so, is there a workaround or a possible patch forthcoming from FCP?
Many thanks,
John

Yes, each tape has an in and out point defined. In my 6 years of editing with Final Cut and DVCAM tapes I've never encountered this issue before in the capturing process until now. I will have to see in future weeks with other captures whether this is an on-going issue or not, but at least I can capture for now.

Bug in my code or strange memory behavior ?

Hi, Guys !
It's been a while since I post something in this forum - trying to use your help when it's really needed.
So, here we go ...
(we use Oracle 8.1.7 on Unix box and SQL * Plus 8.1.6)
While back I wrote "core" PL/SQL package that resides in let's say DB1 database. It has RECORD_EXISTS_FNC function designed to dynamically check If the record exists in certain table/view. Assumptions are that you pass in :
Table/View name, Column name, and unique numeric value (because by DBA rules all of our Tables have SEQUENCE as a Primary Key. And I plan soon to put in overloaded function to accept unique character value)
Also every Table has SYS_TIME_STAMP and SYS_UPDATE_SEQuence columns that populated by Trigger before Insert/Update representing Last Update time_stamp
and how many times record was updated within same second.
(in case more than one User updates same record in same time - that was written before Oracle had more granular date/time). So function has SYS_TIME_STAMP and SYS_UPDATE_SEQUENCE parameters (optional) accordingly.
And It looks something like :
FUNCTION RECORD_EXISTS_FNC
(iBV_NAME IN USER_VIEWS.VIEW_NAME%TYPE,
iPK_FIELD IN USER_TAB_COLUMNS.COLUMN_NAME%TYPE,
iPK_VALUE IN NUMBER,
iSYS_TIME_STAMP IN DATE DEFAULT NULL,
iSYS_UPDATE_SEQ IN NUMBER DEFAULT NULL) RETURN BOOLEAN IS
TYPE REF_CUR IS REF CURSOR;
CR REF_CUR;
i PLS_INTEGER DEFAULT 0;
vRESULT BOOLEAN DEFAULT FALSE;
vQUERY USER_SOURCE.TEXT%TYPE;
BEGIN
vQUERY := 'SELECT 1 FROM ' || iBV_NAME || ' WHERE ' || iPK_FIELD || ' = ' || iPK_VALUE;
IF iSYS_TIME_STAMP IS NOT NULL AND iSYS_UPDATE_SEQ IS NOT NULL THEN
vQUERY := vQUERY || ' AND SYS_TIME_STAMP = TO_DATE (''' || iSYS_TIME_STAMP || ''')
AND SYS_UPDATE_SEQ = ' || iSYS_UPDATE_SEQ;
END IF;
IF iBV_NAME IS NOT NULL AND
iPK_FIELD IS NOT NULL AND
iPK_VALUE IS NOT NULL THEN
OPEN CR FOR vQUERY;
FETCH CR INTO i;
vRESULT := CR%FOUND;
CLOSE CR;
END IF;
RETURN vRESULT;
EXCEPTION
WHEN OTHERS THEN
IF CR%ISOPEN THEN
CLOSE CR;
END IF;
INSERT_ERROR_LOG_PRC ('CORE_PKG', 'ORACLE', SQLCODE, SQLERRM, 'RECORD_EXISTS_FNC');
RETURN vRESULT;
END RECORD_EXISTS_FNC;
So the problem is when I call this function from let's say
database DB2 (via db remote link and synonym) and I know exactly that record does exists (because I am selecting those SYS fields before pass them in) - I get the correct result TRUE. The other programmer (Patrick) calls this function within same DB2 database, within same UserID/password (obviously different session), running exactly the same testing code and gets result FALSE (record doesn't exist, but it does !) He tried to Logoff/Login again several times within several days and try to run it and still was getting FALSE !
I tried to Logoff/Login again and I was getting mostly TRUE and sometimes FALSE too !!!
I thought may be It has something to do with REF CURSOR that I use to build SQL on the fly, so I changed to NDS
using EXECUTE IMMEDIATE statement - nothing changed.
vQUERY := 'SELECT COUNT (1) FROM ' || iBV_NAME || ' WHERE ' || iPK_FIELD || ' = ' || iPK_VALUE;
IF iSYS_TIME_STAMP IS NOT NULL AND iSYS_UPDATE_SEQ IS NOT NULL THEN
vQUERY := vQUERY || ' AND SYS_TIME_STAMP = TO_DATE (''' || iSYS_TIME_STAMP || ''') AND SYS_UPDATE_SEQ = ' || iSYS_UPDATE_SEQ;
END IF;
EXECUTE IMMEDIATE vQUERY INTO i;
vRESULT := NOT (i = 0);
RETURN vRESULT;
Interesting note : when Patrick doesn't pass SYS parameters (Time_stamp, Update_sequence), or passes NULLs - function always finds the record ! (Statement 2 below)
May be it has to do with the way TO_DATE () function gets parsed in that dynamic SQL - I don't know ...
Here's the test code :
SET SERVEROUTPUT ON;
DECLARE
SYS_TIME DATE;
SYS_SEQ NUMBER;
bEXISTS BOOLEAN DEFAULT FALSE;
BEGIN
SELECT SYS_TIME_STAMP, SYS_UPDATE_SEQ INTO SYS_TIME, SYS_SEQ FROM LOCATION_BV WHERE PK = 1;
bEXISTS := CORE_PKG.RECORD_EXISTS_FNC ('LOCATION_BV','PK',1, SYS_TIME, SYS_SEQ); -- STATEMENT 1
--bEXISTS := CORE_PKG.RECORD_EXISTS_FNC ('LOCATION_BV','PK',1, NULL, NULL); -- STATEMENT 2
IF bEXISTS THEN
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE ('TRUE');
ELSE
DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE ('FALSE');
END IF;
END;
I asked our DBA, he has no clue about this strange inconsistent results.
I debugged line by line, extracted that generated SQL and ran it in same account - works fine !
Does anyone knows or have clues or can help what's going on ???
I don't know If this is bug in my code or strange memory behavior ?
(Please let me know If anything unclear)
Thanx a lot for your help and time !
Steve K.

see your other thread
Bug in my code or strange memory behavior ?

Strange email problem; it started only loading unread emails, but from 3 months ago. It is now loading new emails too, but no emails in the past month, read or unread. It's gmail, set up through the phone, I've restarted restored

Strange email problem; it started only loading unread emails, but from 3 months ago. It is now loading new emails too, but no emails in the past month, read or unread. It's gmail, set up through the phone, I've restarted restored and updated firmware, deleted the account, anything I could think of, but it's just not accurately downloading the most recent emails.

The answer is very simple: You were not the original owner of the phone. Target sold you a phone that had been returned. You can verify the date of the original sale here: Apple - Support - Check Your Service and Support Coverage. I suspect you will find that the warranty expiration date is not one year from the date that you bought it.

Strange Permissions Behavior with Public/Private Drop Box

Strange Permissions Behavior with Non-Course Drop Box
In an effort to promote iTunes U on campus this semester (and to get people working with audio and video more) we're having a contest in which people can submit personal or group audio/video projects.
This being an iTunes promo, we intend for students to submit their contributions via a drop box.
To that end, I began experimenting with drop boxes in iTunes U, which I haven't done much of previously. I've created a course called "iTunes U Drop Box Test" under "Campus Events". Within that, I have two tabs: "Featured Submissions" and "Dropbox". My goal with this drop box was to allow faculty, students and college folks the ability to use the drop box ("college" being a role I've defined for those who don't fit into the faculty/student roles).
When I first started experimenting, access to the "iTunes U Drop Box Test" course looked like this:
--- Credentials (System) ---
Edit: Administrator@urn:mace:itunesu.com:sites:lafayette.edu
Download: Authenticated@urn:mace:itunesu.com:sites:lafayette.edu
Download: Unauthenticated@urn:mace:itunesu.com:sites:lafayette.edu
Download: All@urn:mace:itunesu.com:sites:lafayette.edu
--- Credentials ----
Download: College@urn:mace:lafayette.edu
Download: Instructor@urn:mace:lafayette.edu
Download: Instructor@urn:mace:lafayette.edu:classes:${IDENTIFIER}
Download: Student@urn:mace:lafayette.edu
Download: Student@urn:mace:lafayette.edu:classes:${IDENTIFIER}
For the "Featured" Submissions tab, I gave the non-system credentials the "download" right, and for the "Dropbox" tab I gave the non-system credentials the "dropbox" right.
My understanding of this setup is that everyone should have had the ability to view the course and the contents of the "Featured Submissions" tab and that those in the College/Instructor/Student roles would be able to upload files via the "Dropbox" tab ... but not see the contents of said tab after the files were uploaded (aside from any files they uploaded themselves).
This is not the behavior we saw however. While the College/Instructor/Student roles could upload files to the dropbox, everyone (including the unauthenticated public) was able to see all of the contents of the dropbox.
The only way I could get this to work as advertised was to change all of the system credentials save the "Administrator" to "No Access":
--- Credentials (System) ---
Edit: Administrator@urn:mace:itunesu.com:sites:lafayette.edu
No Access: Authenticated@urn:mace:itunesu.com:sites:lafayette.edu
No Access: Unauthenticated@urn:mace:itunesu.com:sites:lafayette.edu
No Access: All@urn:mace:itunesu.com:sites:lafayette.edu
Once I did this, everything worked as advertised: College/Instructor/Student roles could upload tracks, and the "Dropbox" tab would only display tracks they uploaded.
So my question is ... is this the correct behavior for the drop box? It looks like when the system credentials are in play, they're simply overriding whatever the normal "view" rule is for the drop box, which doesn't seem right.

Your current configuration where things work as you wanted does seem correct to me. You are not using any System Credentials to accomplish the functionality and that's fine.
Here's some more info to clarify how / why this is working for you and why you had to set "No Access" for the System Credentials:
The System Credential "Authenticated@..." is going to get assigned to any user that goes through your transfer script. Even if you transfer script assigns no credentials to a user, upon entering iTunes U they will have at least 1 - the "Authenticated@..." credential. Therefore, unless you block access using "No Access", any user that passes through your transfer script is going to be able to access the area in question.
When you change values for "Unauthenticated@..." or "All@..." you are defining what someone that DOES NOT pass through your transfer script can do. You want both of those to be "No Access" at the top level of your site if you do not want unauthenticated visitors.
The distinction between "Unauthenticated" and "All" is that "All" applies to all users whether they pass through the transfer script or not.
Here's another way to remember things:
User passes through your transfer script, iTunes U automatically assigns:
Authenticated@....
All@....
User does not pass through your transfer script and instead access your iTunes U site through derivable URL*, they get assigned:
Unauthenticated@....
All@....
*The derivable URL for a site is: http://deimos.apple.com/WebObjects/Core.woa/Browse/site-domain-name
Mac OS X (10.4.6)

Strange XSLT Behavior: xsl:template match

Hello I found the following strange XSLT behavior when using xsl:template. I only want to read the content of the element /Source/Surname/Details. Therefore I match this path using xsl:template match.
What is strange that in the target message also the value of the Element LastName is written at the end. Please see example below. This is just a short example to point out the problem. I have a bigger message structure where I have to match a similar path. How can I avoid the the value of the FullDetails is just written at the end (not even beeing in an element)? I would have expected that the path is only matched once and the instructions then executed without <LastName> beeing even touched.I used XML Spy for this test.
Here is an example:
Source message:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<Source>
     <Surname>
          <Details>MyFirstName</Details>
     </Surname>
     <LastName>
          <FullDetails> MyLastName </FullDetails>
     </LastName>
</Source>
XSLT
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" xmlns:fo="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format">
<xsl:template match="/Source/Surname">
<PORR>
<Name><xsl:value-of select="Details"/></Name>
</PORR>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
Target Message
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<PORR xmlns:fo="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format">
<Name>MyFirstName</Name></PORR>MyLastName
Edited by: Florian Guppenberger on Oct 8, 2009 4:35 AM
Edited by: Florian Guppenberger on Oct 8, 2009 4:36 AM
Edited by: Florian Guppenberger on Oct 8, 2009 4:36 AM
Edited by: Florian Guppenberger on Oct 8, 2009 4:37 AM

Hi,
I am not sure why your XSLT behaving like that,please try this XSL,what i did chnages is Templete match /*,I given exact path in Value of select,.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform" xmlns:fo="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format">
<xsl:template match="/*">
<PORR>
<Name><xsl:value-of select="/Source/Surname/Details"/></Name>
</PORR>
</xsl:template>
</xsl:stylesheet>
Regards,
Raj

Strange email addresses during setup

Hi all,
Have a question that has stumped both Apple and Verizon representatives. I received my iPhone 6 plus today, and at a point during setup it asks me for my iCloud ID and password. After accepting that, it takes me to the screen asking which backup to use. After selecting the most recent (or any for that matter) it took me to a screen asking for the password associated to a completely random and strange e-mail address I have never seen. The Apple repeesentative finally told me to skip this step. I agreed, and when taken to the next step it again asked me for the password to the email address associated with purchases except it was a different strange email. I once more skipped, only to see another e-mail that I have no knowledge on and do not know anyone associated with it. Both Apple suggestions do not appear to be viable, as I never back up or sync from other computers and I haven't added any other emails to my account. I toyed with the idea that maybe I had received a floor model, but I don't think that's the case as it arrived in the original, plastic wrapped package. I realize this was long-winded, just wondering if anyone had any ideas on the cause. I searched and didn't find anything remotely related, which makes this even stranger. thanks in advance to anyone who might have a suggestion.
MIke

If you are on WiFi only then it should not cost anything...BB10 devices are capable of all data-level services via WiFi only. However, what is not controllable is what actually happens when you are traveling. For example, if you leave your Mobile Network running for roaming voice services, then there is of course some possibility that something will traverse that network instead of the WiFi network (out of range, for example). But, of you are really concerned, one way to be certain would be to keep all Data Services off while you are strictly in voice mode (e.g., not near any WiFi). When you are on WiFi, turn your Mobile Network services off and turn on Data Services. That way, you can be sure that no data services will ever traverse the Mobile Network.
However, that may be overkill...but there is no way for us to know what your carrier nor the carrier on which you are roaming might or might not do.
Good luck!
Occam's Razor nearly always applies when troubleshooting technology issues!
If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the button inside of their post. Please click here and read, along with the threads to which it links, for helpful information to guide you as you proceed. I always recommend that you treat your BlackBerry like any other computing device, including using a regular backup schedule...click here for an article with instructions.
Join our BBM Channels
BSCF General Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

Strange email address while restoring from iCloud!

Hey
I am restoring my data from iCloud to my new iPhone 5S but while I am restoring they tell me to enter the password for emails idk and when I click cancel they show me another email address until I reach to mine.
what's happening? and why I am seeing like 4-5 emails adresses before I reach mine?
Thanks!

Thanks for ur reply
My problem is when I am restoring from iCloud and when they ask me to enter my password they ask me to enter the password for email I don't know and when I click skip I see another strange email until I reach to my email and enter my password to start syncing my data from iCloud. So I mean that why they are showing me strange emails addresses that I don't know and I have to write their password so from where did that email address come?

Strange email from Skype ??

Hi! Two times so far that I received a strange email from Skype, in spanish or something!! I'm wondering what this is all about and why the heck spanish? I'm french canadian!
The email says something like :
Tu crédito quedará inactivo en 3 días.
Aparentemente, hace tiempo que no usas tu crédito de Skype. Recuerda que si no lo usas en un periodo de 180 días queda inactivo. Pero no te preocupes porque una vez que quede inactivo puedes reactivarlo cuando estés listo para usarlo. Simplemente inicia sesión en tu cuenta en Internet y sigue los pasos para reactivar el crédito. Detalles de tu cuenta:
Nombre de usuario: (myusername)
Saldo: CAD6,86
Plus, why is it talking about my account not being active and a balance of $6,86 I should have over $16...
Not sure what's going on and where to ask...
Thanks. Pat

ravenlost123 wrote:
Hi! Two times so far that I received a strange email from Skype, in spanish or something!! I'm wondering what this is all about and why the heck spanish? I'm french canadian!
The email says something like :
Tu crédito quedará inactivo en 3 días.
Aparentemente, hace tiempo que no usas tu crédito de Skype. Recuerda que si no lo usas en un periodo de 180 días queda inactivo. Pero no te preocupes porque una vez que quede inactivo puedes reactivarlo cuando estés listo para usarlo. Simplemente inicia sesión en tu cuenta en Internet y sigue los pasos para reactivar el crédito. Detalles de tu cuenta:
Nombre de usuario: (myusername)
Saldo: CAD6,86
That message translate to;
Your credit is inactive in 3 days.
Apparently you have not you use your Skype Credit. Remember that if you use it in a period of 180 days is inactive. But do not worry because once you reactivate it is idlewhen you are ready to use. Just log into your online account and follow the steps to revivecredit. Details of your account:
Username: (myusername)
Balance: CAD6, 86
ravenlost123 wrote:
Plus, why is it talking about my account not being active and a balance of $6,86 I should have over $16...
Not sure what's going on and where to ask...
Thanks. Pat
you may need to contact customer service, you can also ask them to change the language of the emails you are receiving.
How to Contact Skype Customer Service
CONTACT SKYPE CUSTOMER SERVICE | HOW TO RECORD SKYPE VIDEO CALLS | HOW TO HANDLE SUPICIOUS CALLS AND MESSAGES | WINDOWS PROBLEMS TROUBLESHOOTING | SKYPE DOWNLOAD LINKS
MORE TIPS, TRICKS AND UPDATES AT
skypefordummies.blogspot.com

Strange email from Sony?

I just received this strange email from Sony. First they called me the king (thanks for that), and after that they apologized for filling my inbox. That was all it said - have no idea what inbox they're talking about, I hardly doubt my inbox here is full. The email made me smile, was nice and all, but still a bit weird Do anyone know what its about? Had to translate it (the red text), cause my emails are in danish.

I had something like this in the early hours of the morning it seems to be something about a welcome ps4 email and them sending to many. Here's how mine looked. You may need to save the picture to get a better look.

Found strange email address using my apple account for iMessage

Upon upgrading my iOS devices, I found a strange email account was using my apple id account for iMessage

Thanks Demo!
I know that last sentence makes NO SENSE WHATSOEVER. I was dozing off when I made this post. What I was trying to say was: "The frustration of not being able to uniquely identify which device is being used is driving me to drink!" Ha Ha
Thanks again for your input!
~S

Blank text from strange email?

I received a text message from a strange email that I am not familiar with and the text message was blank. Should I be worried? Or could it just be a mistaken email that was sent to me. I have a Droid Razr.

We can never be too careful or cautious now days em02587. I'm sorry for the suspicious text message. If you feel this is some type of spam/ scam, you can forward text to 7726, (SPAM), which will initiate an investigation. However, VZW will not contact you about this, as it'll be an internal investigation.
Hopefully this takes care of things!
Thank you,
VanessaS_VZW
Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

Bizarre email behavior

After having successful Mail use for years I now have a strange problem. Mail fails to send my emails using my Cox ISP. I receive emails without any problems. I can send my emails through my gmail account. Here is where it gets weird. I did all of the usual remedies, resetting the SMC, resetting PRAM, and performing verify disk and repairing disk permissions without correcting Mail's behavior. This behavior continued about one more week then corrected itself and I regained Mail send through my Cox account.
After being 'nice' for about 12 days, the problem has returned and I can send only by my gmail account. Any thoughts or suggestions?
Another point of information. My iPad (iOS 5.1.1) Mail sends and receives email OK through my Cox ISP but I always get the message "The mail server 'pop.west.cox.net' is not responding. Verify that you have entered the correct account info in Mail settings." Since I get and send all email without any problems, I just sigh and ignore it.
All of my device accounts have identical account info. I now have iFatigue.
On a better note, my iPhone (iOS 6.0.1) Mail performs properly as expected.

I wish I could help but I still live with the problem on my iMac. My iPhone (4S) has no problem but my iPad would not recognize the Cox accounts. I finally deleted the Cox email accounts and re-entered them. That worked for the iPad. Bizarre!
On the iMac, I apparently at random, I successful send email using either of my Cox email addresses, but usually Mail forces me choose my Gmail account to send. Again, bizarre!

Strange email behavior...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for