SUBSEQUENT GR AND PAYMENT TO VENDOR

Hello experts,
I have following scenario in my business process..
I am working in a hosiery company. I am supplying yarn to my subcontractor (vendor) for knitting
In my subcontracting PO I have mention po quantity as 100kg, and I m supplying 100 kg of yarn to my vendor.
Now I am receiving 110 kg of knitting material. That means my vendor is giving me extra 10 kg of yarn from his pocket. So I have to payment my vendor in this way.
1. 110 kg processing charges.(let say 10 rupees/ kg)
2. 10 kg of yarn price (suppose 150 rupees/kg)
When I receiving 110 kg of knitting material there is a negative VENDOR stock of -10 kg. so is there any way to avoid negative stock.
Again how to pay my vendor for these 10 kg yarn extra.
What is the customization in MIGO and MIRO I have to follow?
Plz help me out . plz reply me in details.
REGARDS
raghu

Hi,
I think the problem is the overdelivery, you order 100 kg and you receive 110 kg.
So how to avoid overdelivery against PO.   To overcome this problem you can use the "value Keys"
Go to customizing :
Materials Management>>>Purchasing>>>Material Master>>>Define Purchasing Value Keys
Define a Value Key with the required overdelivery tolerance "0%" .
Then go to Material master data, Purchasing View... Tcode MM02
Assign this Value Key number to the material in the field "Purchasing Value Key"
However, why your subcontractor is selling raw material, there is no contract between you concerning this issue. You could refuse his offer of 10Kg, because this disturb the functioning.
To overcome the actual situation there are two possibilities :
                     - You give him back raw material through mvt 541, qty will be reset to Zero
                    - You accept the raw material, so you have to define new vendor master data for this subcontractor, but as standard vendor and you create an order with 10kg raw material. then you make a virtual receiption and resend qty to him.
regards

Similar Messages

Claim Creation, capture of cost against WBS and Payment to Vendor.

Hi,
My Scenario is as follow-
I have a customer which is afftected by my project. He is affected and the has carried some work on his own to restore the things which are affected due to my project.
Now he is claiming that amount from my company and after accessing, we realise that that is a real damage and we need to pay to the customer.
Hence i am trying to map it in SAP as follow-
I am Creating a claim with cost and assigning a WBS element to it. Now the cost of the claim is not getting reflecting anywhere at WBS element. I am aware about the BADI - NOTIF_COST_CUS_CHECK.
I have not activated this BADI but the description says that when activated, it should create an internal order when i save the claim. Now i want to know what are the effect of cost of claim on WBS (Will it be displayed as planned or actual cost on WBS and is there any relation with the status of claim?)
The other question is that if i am creating this claim as a claim of customer to whom i need to pay certain amount, how WBS and internal order will help me in executing the payment to customer?
Waiting for advice please.
Thanks
Rajesh

Hi,
Please refer following link on Claims
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/PSCLM/PSCLM.pdf
Regards
Tushar

Table Relation with Payment and Invoice of Vendor

Hi all,
     I have one question about Table Relation with Payment and Invoice of Vendor.
     the scenario is.
     2 Purchase Order number : 100000001/100000002
     1 Invoice document number : 200000001 which include 2 Purchase Order.
     1 Payment document number : 300000001
     How should I found out table relation from Payment document number - Invoice document number - Purchase Order number. ?
      I try to link the following table, but it does not work.
      RBKP     *     Invoice Receipt
      RSEG     *     Invoice Receipt document line item
      BKPF     *     Accounting Document Header
BSEG     *     Accounting Document Segment
PAYR          Payment Medium File
BSIK          Accounting: Secondary Index for Vendors
BSAK          Accounting: Secondary Index for Vendors (Cleared Items)
BSIS          Accounting: Secondary Index for G/L Accounts (Open Items)
Does any one know about it ?
Regards
KY Chuang

Hi Venkatesh,
Thnx a lot for the reply. This has almost solved my problem, however there's one thing left. when I'm trying to take a print out after exporting the info into an excel sheet, the information really looks scattered, i.e., is there a way where we can go ahead and get the info in a rather unscattered manner.
I've tried to take a print directly without actually transferring the info into an excel sheet, then each of the vendor is printed in a separate page, which again they feel is a problem.
So, if you have an idea pls suggest.
Thnx again for the information.
regards
sandhya

Advance payment to vendor business process and configuration

Hi All,
Please share any PDF or links for configuration and business process of advance payment to vendor. We are going to implement in ECC6 system.
Thanks in advance.
Thanks & Regards,
Chand
Edited by: Csaba Szommer on Jan 6, 2012 8:12 AM

Hi,
Vendor Downpayment functionality might be useful for your case. You may implement EHP4 in your system which provides an enhanced downpayment funtionality which allows you to enter the downpayments while PO creation only. The downpayment can then later be cleared during Invoice processing.
You might need help of FI consultant as well, because downpayment is mainly FI related.
Don't have any PDF as such but search in the forums with vendor downpayments and you will definately get good results.
Regards,
Sushant

Housebank and payment method for vendor

Hi
While doing MIRO, i want housebank and payment method to populate from vendor master data. I maintained both these details in VM data but its not populating automatically in MIRO. Please help. (m using ECC 6)
Sadhana

Thanks Rinku.
If we keep house bank and payment method fields blank while doing data entry, system will pick them up from VM data at the time of payment run. Right??
But if the housebank field is mandatory for data entry (as in my scenario), then we have no option but to fill the fields up at the time of MIRO or FB60.
In my scenario, daily there are 150 bills processed at one centre, and the user has to fill up these two fields every time. Is there any other solution so that this trouble can be saved?
Thanks (points assigned).

Payment setoff between Vendor and Alternative payee vendor

Hi
It is assumed that if a vendor account points to another vendor account for payment i.e Alternate Payee vendor, the two account balances will be combined into one payment. This is currently not happening.
A separate payment is issued under each vendor account.(i.e Original vendor and the Alternative payee vemdor).
For an example a vendor that is linked to another for payment but there is a credit sitting on the Payee account that is not getting offset against the other invoices paid to the vendor.
Note: Both Original vendor and Alternative payee vendor are created as vendors and payments are due to both the vendors.
Regards

Hi,
Your assumption does work in our system (604).
This was the test I ran.
Created main vendor.
Created invoices and credit memo.
Went back and updated vendor record to add an Alternative Payee.
Then created additional invoices but still used the main vendor number.
Ran F110 and all invoices and credit memo entered above paid to the Alternative Payee - non to Main Vendor but clearing docs are still under the Main Vendor under FBl1n.
I think that is what you were wanting to work in yours? Correct?
Some questions for you:
1. Did you check to see if there are any OSS notes? like 1449061 or 1432181 that may apply?
2. Did you confirm that both the main vendor and the alternative payee have the same payment methods??
3. Have you analyzed the invoices/credit memos that the system is still paying on the main vendor to see what may be different about those? For example are you using payment method supplement?

Fb60 is not updating the vendor master HB and payment method

Hi,
For APP i have maintained the house bank and payment method in vendor master. When we do the FB60, system is not copying the house bank and payment method in FB60 document. Can any one guide me on this.
govind

Hi,
Field status is optional only. And in FB60 screen i can able to view the house bank and payment method. My doubt is i have assigned the house bank and payment method in vendor master, hence while doing the fb60 system want to pickup and update the house bank and payment method in fb60 transaction. but it is not happening here. So in F110 we are not getting the document which was posted in fb60.
govind

Report showing Payment to vendor with PO and item details

Hi there,
Could you please let us know if in the standard system there is a
report for Payment for vendor that shows PO item number along with
payment details.
We appreciate your reply.
Thanks,
Gajanan

Hi
Refer this link PO wise venodr payment status
Ranga

Payment to Vendor

Hi,
Purchase Order has created for 1000 USD and Goods receipt has done. Invoice is created and Payment has been done to Vendor.
After that Vendor has send one more Invoice for 200 USD because of the material price has increased and our management has agreed to pay the extra amount with reference to the Purchase Order.
Now how to pay the extra 200 USD with reference to the Purchase Order?
Thanks and Regards,

Hi Siddu ,
Post the same as a Subsequent Debit in TCode MIRO.
Regards
Ramesh Ch

Excess Payment to vendor against Down Payment

Dear All,
This is case of excess payment to one vendor for one material PO against down payment.
After allowing advances to this party, our purchase department has changed the prices substantially by negotiating with vendor which resultant into reduce the purchase order value by Rs. 10 lakhs, and due to that our ledger shows Rs. 10 lakhs excess payment.
Our accounts department is not aware about the subsequent change in Purchase order; and they made balance payment to vendor of said amount has to be recovered on account of excess payment over purchase order. But now as per reconciliation, the excess amount recovered on account of subsequent changes in prices in purchase order.
All changes made in the PO has been reflected in the header changes and Item changes as well as version management.
I would like to know how system has allowed to do this transaction as there is no linkage in between down payment and amount going in invoice verification.
Please help me.
Thanking you.
With Best Regards,
Rajesh
Edited by: Rajesh Jadhav on Feb 17, 2009 12:54 PM

HI Raj
When you physically receive the cheque payment from vendor, do the transactions through T Code:F-52 like any other customer receipts.
Regards
Chandrasekaran

"Post Invoice and Payment seperately"

Hi Guys,
I need help on resolving this issue.
We are posting a vendor downpayment using F-48.
We are then doing a vendor invoice and subsequently clearing the open items using F-58. But we are getting the following error while posting
"Deferred Tax : Post Invoice and Payment seperately $1"
Thanks,
Srikanth.

hi,
Do you have two tax codes setup up. One tax code to post with the invoice and another one which is used for transferring when the invoice payment is made. Please check that you are using the right tax code setup for the posting with the invoice.
Regards
Girish BP

Deferred tax: Post invoice and payment separately $1" Message no. DEFTAX020

while reversing a document thru FB08, it is giving the error message,
" Deferred tax: Post invoice and payment separately $1" Message no. DEFTAX020.
This is a stand alone invoice document , without any clearing document. What is to be done ?
Below is the snapshot of FB03:-
Document Number 2256162          Company Code    MLTD         Fiscal Year     2009
Document Date   24.05.2010       Posting Date    25.05.2010   Period          11
Reference       PYX/10-11/032    Cross-CC no.
Currency        INR              Texts exist
Itm PK BusA Acct no.   Description                    Tx     Amount in   INR
001 31 U106 503551     PYXIS SYSTEMS PVT.LTD.         DD             55,150.00-
002 40 COMM 5656       Membership & Subscri           DD             50,000.00
003 40       1371       Service Tax Availed            DD              5,000.00
004 40       1372       Ecess on ST Availed            DD                100.00
005 40       1373       S&H Ecess on ST Avai           DD                 50.00
Document Type   I2 VEMDOR INV-CORPORATE
Doc.Header Text PYXIS SYS.P.LTD.
Branch number         Number of Pages 0
Reference       PYX/10-11/032    Document Date   24.05.2010
                                 Posting Date    25.05.2010
Currency        INR              Posting Period 11 / 2009
Ref. Transactn BKPF Accounting document
Reference key   0002256162MLTD2009    Log.System MALCLNT999
Entered by      NITINRB          Parked by
Entry Date      25.05.2010       Time of Entry   13:05:08
TCode           FBR2
Changed on                       Last update
Ledger Grp                       Ledger
Ref.key(head) 1                       Ref.key 2

Hi,
Check whether OSS note 913805 (see below) offers a solution to your particular issue.
Kind regards, Robert
Note 913805 - Error FF891 or DEFTAX025 when posting FI-Documents Version: 5
Summary
Symptom
The posting of FI-documents cannot be executed due to one of the following error messages:
FF 890 "Vendor and customer items in document with deferred taxes"
FF 891 "G/L account item without tax code in document with deferred taxes"
FF 892 "Error writing to table DEFTAX_ITEM"
DEFTAX 025 (no specific text)
Also update terminations and other errors which are related to function group TAX4 may be the topic of this note.
Other terms
RFUMSV25; RFUMSV50; VAT; deferred tax; BTE; DEFTAX_ITEM; TAX4; SAPSQL_ARRAY_INSERT_DUPREC; FI_POST_DEFTAX_ITEM; FF891; FF890; FF892; FF804; 00 671; FF099; DEFTAX020; DEFTAX021; DEFTAX022; DEFTAX023; DEFTAX025; DEFTAX012; DEFTAX_MX027; DEFTAX_MX047; DEFTAX_MX039; DEFTAX; DEFTAX_MX;
Reason and Prerequisites
Accidentally some business transaction events (BTE) for the new solution for deferred tax were delivered in an active state in support packages of SAP releases 4.70 and ERP 2004. The solution is available in the SAP-Standard only from release ERP 2005. Also in ERP 2005 the new deferred tax can cause problems in countries for which the solution is not released.
These BTEs perform strict tests for documents containing tax codes for deferred tax.
Solution
If you are using the old deferred tax, i.e. you use report RFUMSV25 to create transfer postings, you can safely deactivate these BTEs.
Remove the following BTEs:
00001025 DI-TAX CREATE_DEFTAX_ITEM
00001030 DI-TAX SET_DEFTAX_ITEM
00001040 DI-TAX CREATE_DEFTAX_ITEM_REVERS
00001050 DI-TAX CREATE_DEFTAX_ITEM_MR1M
In ERP 2005 (ECC 600) the application key is 'FI-TAX' instead of the above mentioned 'DI-TAX'.
To do this start transaction FIBF
-> Settings
-> P/S Modules
    ...of an SAP Application
Mark the entries from the list above and delete them.
This deactivates the functionality of 'new deferred tax' for all company codes in all clients on the system. This means that no data is written to table deftax_item at posting time. Report RFUMSV50 can still be started, but it will not process new documents any more.
If in ERP 2005 problems arise in one country but the new deferred tax is used in another country you must not deactivate the BTEs completely. In this case it is possible to restrict the BTEs to be active only in certain countries using the column 'country' in transaction FIBF.
Header Data
Release Status: Released for Customer
Released on: 16.01.2008 20:12:15
Master Language: English
Priority: Correction with medium priority
Category: Program error
Primary Component: FI-GL-GL-F Value Added Tax (VAT)
Affected Releases
Software Component     Release     From Release   ToRelease     And subsequent
SAP_APPL                     46C            46C                   46C
SAP_APPL                     470            470                    470
SAP_APPL                     500            500                    500
SAP_APPL                     600            600                    600
SAP_APPL                     602            602                    602
SAP_APPL                     603            603                    603
SAP_APPL                     604            604                    604
Related Notes
771319 - RFUMSV50: Documentation
Edited by: Robert North on May 26, 2010 11:49 AM
Edited by: Robert North on May 26, 2010 11:50 AM

Downpayments and Payment run

Hello
As a I understand during F110, the payment run would go ahead and make payment against the open items existing. Now in a scenario where there a down payment already effected using F-48, then what will essentially happen is that the vendor is paid extra. Please correct my understanding.
There is a debit check report which can be run to view the vendor debit balances is what I understand.
Can you please let me know what steps need to be carried out in order to ensure that double payments are not routed to the vendor.

Hi Chetan,
1. You can configure Down Payments in FBZP. In that case, both your advance payment (F-48) and Invoice booking will get picked up in F110 and it will net off, that means no payment will be made.
2. Second, is you make F-48 payment to the vendor, and subsequent to this, Invoice booking is done for the vendor, and whe this vendor booking is done, system gives a pop up (an information message) that Down payment for this vendor exists, and then you need to do F-54(Down Payment Clearing) immediately after Vendor Invoice booking.
Regards,
kavita

Difference between Subsequent credit and Credit memo

Hi,
Please tell me what is differnece between Subsequent credit and Credit memo.
You shoud give me on business exmple
Thanks and Regards
Anil Patil

Hi Anil,
For CREDIT MEMO
A Credit Memo (short for "credit memorandum") is a commercial document issued by a seller to a buyer, listing the products, quantities and agreed prices for products or services the seller provided the buyer, but the buyer did not receive or returned. It may be issued in the case of damaged goods, errors or allowances. In respect of the previously issued invoice, a Credit Memo will reduce or eliminate the amount the buyer has to pay.
The Credit Memo usually contains: PO #, Date, Billing Address, Shipping Address, Terms of Payment, List of products with quantities and prices. Usually it references the original Invoice and sometimes states the reason for issue.
Credit Memos are often called Credit Notes or just Credits.
The seller usually issues a Credit Memo for the same or lower amount than the invoice, and then repays the money to the buyer or sets it off against a balance due from other transactions.
The term may also refer to the document provided by a bank to a depositor to indicate the depositor's balance is being increased because of an event other than a deposit, such as the collection by the bank of the depositor's note receivable.
SAP Difference between Credit memo and subsequent debits/credits
Subsequent Debits/Credits are used in cases where the quantity is in the original invoice is to remain the same.
Example:
PO 10 - $10
GR 10 - $10
LIV 10 - $11 (Logistics Invoice Verification)
The vendor invoice is more than that in the Purchase Order.
In order to correct, the Vendor may send in another invoice for the Increased amount
or a credit memo for the reduce amount.
If you approve of the price increase,
post the subsequent invoice received as a Subsequent Debit Invoice.
If it is a credit memo that has been received for reducing $1 of invoice price,
then post the credit memo as Subsequent Credit.
This would retain the quantity but reduce the amount.
Subsequent Debit/Credit is for the case when the credit is not for the full amount
eg. if the Vendor decided to credit & only the $1 overcharged.
Credit memo is for the credit of the full amount and value.
Regards,
VB

Report for conversion payment of vendor against grn quantity.

Dear all,
In our scenario, we are doing conversion payment of vendor against SCO (subcontracting order) on the basis of GRN quantity. But, I am unable to found that how much conversion payments are pending against grn quantity in one month. Is there any report to found or any other process except through purchase order history of any order. Plz help me.
Thanks & regards
Rahul

HI,
first thing payment not update in Po history and its sap standard.because you pay give payment to vendor against two different PO.
for that you have to open MIRO means invoice document and check in that clearance document is there or not.
if clearance document means payment is done.in report ME80FN execute that report and then select change icon from header
and then select Po history
now you will get report PO-MIGO-MIRO
now click on miro then open account document and check clearing document there for invoice .
Regards
Kailas Ugale

SUBSEQUENT GR AND PAYMENT TO VENDOR

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for