Substitute field lifnr

I have a requiredment to populate all line items in an FI doucment with the vendor number, this is so when perfroming GL reports they can easily pull the vendor into the reports. However when, substituing the vendor number from line item 1 into other lines, somewhere after the user exit has been processed SAP seems to be setting the lifnr field back to initial. I realise lifnr is a key field but I am wondering if anyone else has been able to successfully substitute this field?

Hi ,
i agree with Rob , u cannt update LIFNR for all the line items.but if u want to try, then try to Update BSEG-LIFNR in the substitution program.I dont know how u designed ur G/L Report ?, say if its a Material G/L, then how do display Lifnr on that line ?
anyhow if u are <= 4.7 , u can search for the substitution program GGBS* .
regards
Prabhu

Similar Messages

BAdI: Field LIFNR not ready to accept input (Change will not be adopted)

Dear Guruz...\
given below is the warning with message number
BAdI: Field LIFNR not ready to accept input (Change will not be adopted)
Message no. MIGO050
while i am trying to enter the batch name for removal for scrapping and clicking check this warning is being displayed.
KIndly if you are having any other solutions in customizing other than using BADI... pl discuss..

Hi,
You must have some kind of BAdI (probably MB_MIGO_ITEM_BADI och MB_MIGO_BADI) that places a value in the field LIFNR (vendor). However, this field is not open for entry and hence SAP ignores the value provided by the BAdI.
Either correct your BAdI so it doesn't populate the field when the latter is not available (e.g. based on the mvt /special stock ind.) or live with this warning message - it is harmless.
BR
Raf

Substitute fields in table BSEC

Hello to you all,
Does anyone know of an option to substitute fields in table BSEC while posting FI doc?
Using FM SAMPLE_PROCESS_00001120 (of course, a local Z version of the FM), is not relevant as mentioned in NOTE 996552
The rest of the FM in the same area, are block for changing as well.
Regards,
Amir

Check this sap help documentation
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/cf/21eb6e446011d189700000e8322d00/content.htm
and check the "constraints" part in the link
Please search before asking these basic questions
a®

Substitutions - field does not appear in list of 'substitutable fields'

Specifically, I would like to use a exit substitution to replace the content of the Structure PRPS-POSID field.
However, I cannot seem to use a simple substitution rule (since PRPS-POSID does not appear as a substitutable field in the PRPS list of fields that pops up when creating a 'Step'). Most of the PRPS field are availed as 'substitutable fields' but not POSID.
The user exit approach is proving difficult since I cannot add the following code unless I put in a data or tables statement (which is NOT recommended).
If proj-PSPID(7) <> prps-POSID(7) .
prps-posiD(7) = PROJ-PSPID(7) .
ENDIF.
Please help!

Hello Shrikant;
The requirement is to ensure that the WBS element numbering (prps-posid(7) ) will always match that of the Project Definition (proj-pspid(7) ). This numbering rule is required to comply with the Fund Centre numbering since the fund center number utilizes the Project Definition number as an identifier ( I will email you some screen prints).
If there is a discrepency between the WBS element numbering (prps-posid(7) ) and the Project Definition (proj-pspid(7) ) number, the requirement is to assign Project Definition (proj-pspid(7) to the WBS element numbering (prps-posid(7) . The transaction used to call the substitution exit is CJ20N.
A big thanks for your comments so far.
Peter Forster.

Make Business Place (BSEG-BUPLA) field a substitutable field

Hi All,
We need to create a substitution rule to populate business place field(BSEG-BUPLA) in FI documents automatically. We have only one business place and it is assigned to a plant. When there are documents that does not involve plant, then we need to populate the field with business place automatically.
When creating the substitution rule, business place is not shown in the list of substitutable fields. I tried to make changes in GB01 table and remove the exclude check mark for BUPLA but we could not edit the ta ble.We are in 4.6c version. I tried GB01C table and the related views also. The view already does not contain any entry.
It seems we need to update GB01 only and remove the exclude check box for BUPLA field (Bool class 009, class type S, table BSEG, field BUPLA)
Is there any OSS note or pointers to update BUPLA in GB01 table
Thanks & Regards
Anupama

Hi
Hope , below mentioned link will help you to solve your problem
Business place and section code substitution
Regards
Praveen P C

Add Substitutable Fields in transaction OBBH

Hi,
I need to add a substitutable field to the list of substitutable fields present in transaction OBBH. Any suggestions would be helpful.
Thanks,
Alam.

This has been answered in your first request.
pls assign points if helpful as a way to say thanks.

Add Substitutable Field VALUT

Dear All,
I would like to have field VALUT (Value Date) as a substitutable field which is presently not available. Please guide me how to make this field as substitutable.
Thanks.

Eli/All,
I'm thinking about creating a substitution rule based on trading partner and original FI account.
Specifically the prerequisite is:
( BSEG-HKONT = '502610' OR BSEG-HKONT = '521200' )
AND BSEG-VBUND <> ''
And the substution is:
BSEG-HKONT = '541100'
I know that I first have to modify table GB01 to allow BSEG-HKONT as a substitution field.
My question is: Is there any issue with substituting one G/L account for another?
Thanks,
Dan

Adding a new Substitutable Field in OBBH - BKPF Table

Hi All,
I need to modify the content of the field BKPF-WWERT and BKPF-KURSF in Tcode OBBH using substitution logic.
I have even used user exit options to do so but my changes are reversed the moment once the user exit is over.
I know for a fact the fields which can be modifed are maintained in the table GB01.
Is there any way we can modify the table in Standard way using some Tcode?
Please help me out. This is very urgent.
Regards,
Binay Agarwal

Hi Dave,
Can this change result is some kind of problem in some SAP standard code somewhere? Any idea?
Please let me know. I will surely reward points. I have done the changes and it seems to work.
Regards,
Binay Agarwal

Substitute Field Values Case Statement

Hey,
I need help with a CASE Statement to display certain field values based on another field value.
This is the data in table DEPT
DEPTNO       DNAME              LOC
10               ACCOUNTING     NEW YORK
20               RESEARCH         DALLAS
30               SALES               CHICAGO
40               OPERATIONS     BOSTONThis is my select statement.
SELECT DEPTNO, DNAME,
(CASE LOC
    WHEN 'NEW YORK' THEN ''
--WHEN LOC = 'NEW YORK' THEN DEPTNO = ''
--WHEN LOC = 'NEW YORK' THEN DNAME = ''
END) AS LOC
FROM DEPTWhen I uncomment out the two lines I get an error message. The results are
DEPTNO       DNAME              LOC
10               ACCOUNTING     -
20               RESEARCH         -
30               SALES               -
40               OPERATIONS     -I do not want to clear all the values for LOC. I would like to display no values for DEPTNO and DNAME if LOC = 'NEW YORK'. Has anyone ever done this before?
Correct Results...
DEPTNO       DNAME              LOC
-                  -                      NEW YORK
20               RESEARCH         DALLAS
30               SALES               CHICAGO
40               OPERATIONS     BOSTON

Like this?
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 SELECT CASE WHEN LOC != 'NEW YORK' THEN DEPTNO END AS DEPTNO
2        ,CASE WHEN LOC != 'NEW YORK' THEN DNAME END AS DEPTNO
3        ,LOC
4* FROM DEPT
SQL> /
    DEPTNO DEPTNO         LOC
                          NEW YORK
        20 RESEARCH       DALLAS
        30 SALES          CHICAGO
        40 OPERATIONS     BOSTON
        50 IT SUPPORT     LONDON
SQL>

PLPO-LIFNR. Vendor field in blank

Hello,
I am new in the forum and I have a question I would like to comment. I hope to explain correctly. My problem is this:
In CA01, I use a number of modification (AENNR) and I modify an external operation (routing - outsourced manufacturing). Then, the vendor field (LIFNR) disappears and this creates problems when I run CEWB filtering by group and vendor because the search is not correct.
When I modify an external operation with the change master and I check SE11 PLPO, a new register is generated. But I verify that in the new register the LIFNR field is blank and it should not.
I'm looking for some related note but I don't find nothing.
Could anyone help me?
Thank you very much

Hi Kunal,
Vendor field is never filled at the time of transfer posting.
Once we do sub contracting , then after giving sub contrctng vendor name, in grid it will be displayed under "vendor transfer posting" field.
My question is when this vendor field will be filled during Transfer posting.
Uts
Edited by: Utsav.agra on May 6, 2009 11:27 AM

Changing the field content of 'wrbtr' in accounting document during Post Goods Issue in VL02N

Hi Experts,
     I have requirement ,where I need to change the 'amount in document currency value (wrbtr)' in line item of a accounting document, which is created as part Post Goods issue through VL02N.
          I have already check BADI's below as follows:-.
1) LE_SHP_GOODSMOVEMENT- No accounting document information flows in this BADI.
2) AC_DOCUMENT - Field 'WRBTR' is not available in substitutable fields list.
3) BTE-1050 - This BTE is not getting triggered while doing PGI.
        Please suggest any other possibilities to make the change.
Thanks & Regards,
Suganth.

Hi Kartik,
            I have checked the enhancement you specified, but it didn't trigger during PGI. Can u please let me know is there any other possibilities to make the change.
Thanks
Suganth.

Hiding a input field in the F4 help...?

hi,
How can we hide a input field(selection criteria) in the F4 help.
Eg- if we use standard serch help KRED_C for the field lifnr. i want to hide 'Name' from the filter criteria??
Thanks

Hi Pavan,
It's a reccurring question in BSP forum that cannot be solved that easily...
You will find some examples of how it can be handled in demo BSP :
<b>bsp_valuehelp</b>
<b>bsp_vhelp</b> (this one is MVC-oriented)
To go further, you should have a look at the following blog :
/people/thomas.jung3/blog/2004/09/17/bsp-150-a-developer146s-journal-part-xii-150-value-input-help-popups
/people/thomas.jung3/blog/2004/11/01/bsp-value-input-help-popups-version-20-part-1
Hope it helps.
Best regards,
Guillaume

Adding new field in Sales order

Hi frnds,
i need to add a field (LIFNR) in item level of sales order. can any body tell me thru which screen exist i can add the field? i hope i need to add the field in VBAP first then i need to go the screen.
actually i have done the similar in PO. in that i found one screen exist and in include tables i have added the field, but in SO i am not able to find the screen exist as well as include tables.
points will be rewarded for help ful answers.
thanks in advance.
regards,
Balu

Reddy,
You can make use the belowsaid code for identifying user exits pertaining to any transaction.
Source Code to find User Exits 1
* REPORT YSMOD2
* SELECTION TEXTS : INPUT1 ----> Enter search term for Trxn.
*                   INPUT2 ----> Enter type of exit
REPORT YSMOD2 .
TABLES: MODSAP, MODACT, TSTC.
PARAMETERS: INPUT1 LIKE TSTC-TCODE DEFAULT ' ',
            INPUT2 LIKE MODSAP-TYP DEFAULT ' '.
DATA: SEARCH1(6),
      SEARCH2(3),
      SEARCH3 LIKE MODSAP-MEMBER.
DATA : FIRST_ROW VALUE 'Y'.
CONCATENATE: '%' INPUT1 '%' INTO SEARCH1,
             '%' INPUT2     INTO SEARCH2.
SELECT * FROM TSTC WHERE TCODE LIKE SEARCH1.
FIRST_ROW = 'Y'.
CHECK TSTC-PGMNA NE SPACE.
CONCATENATE '%' TSTC-PGMNA '%' INTO SEARCH3.
SELECT * FROM MODSAP WHERE TYP LIKE SEARCH2
                       AND MEMBER LIKE SEARCH3.
    SELECT SINGLE * FROM MODACT WHERE MEMBER = MODSAP-NAME.
    IF FIRST_ROW EQ 'Y'.
      WRITE: /0 TSTC-TCODE, 6 TSTC-PGMNA, 16 MODSAP-NAME, 32 MODSAP-TYP,
                                       45 MODSAP-MEMBER, 70 MODACT-NAME.
      FIRST_ROW = 'N'.
    ELSE.
WRITE: /16 MODSAP-NAME, 32 MODSAP-TYP, 45 MODSAP-MEMBER, 70 MODACT-NAME.
    ENDIF.
    CLEAR : MODSAP, MODACT.
ENDSELECT.
IF SY-SUBRC NE 0.
    WRITE : /0 TSTC-TCODE, 6 TSTC-PGMNA, 30 'No exits found'.
ENDIF.
CLEAR TSTC.
ENDSELECT.
END-OF-SELECTION.
CLEAR: SEARCH1, SEARCH2, SEARCH3.
Regards

FAGLL03 vendor code LIFNR

Hi,
In FAGLL03, vendor field (LIFNR) is available but it is empty. In order to have value for such field, I have modified the customizing: financial accounting --> general ledger accounting --> master data --> G/L accounts --> Line Items --> Define special fields for line item display. In such table I have specified BSEG - LIFNR as an special field.
I did such customizing in our devolopment (test) system (DSA) and everything was ok. When I run FAGLL03, I can see the vendor field and with the correct value. Afterwards, I transported such customizing to our test system (TSA) and then to our production system (PSA). But in both systems the result was not the same as in our DSA system. The problem was that in FAGLL03, after transporting the changes in customizing, vendor code was not available, the field had disappeared.
I wrote an oss note and they have answered me telling:
"I compared and I found the reason for different behaviour in DSA and PSA:
Please analyze the activation log of the relevant structure for FAGLL03
-> FAGLPOSYEXT.
Call transaction SE11 and enter the relevant structure in the 'Data
type' field:
FAGLL03 -> FAGLPOSYEXT
Display the structure.
Then, choose Utilities -> Activation Log.
Under DSA you can find
Activate table FAGLPOSYEXT (VAALL001/02.12.08/12:33)
Field name U_LIFNR can be provided in this system. Please do not use.!! Table FAGLPOSYEXT was activated successfully
Field name U_LIFNR can be provided in this system. Please do not use.
Message no. DT283
Diagnosis
The field with the name you selected can be included in a later system
delivery, for example with an upgrade. In this case your field would be
overwritten with the attributes of the delivered field, which might
result in a conversion.
System Response
The table is not activated if its name is in the producer namespace. It
is activated with warnings if its name is in the recipient namespace.
Procedure
Use a field in the namespace you were allcoated.
You did a modification that has been overwritten.
By standard design:
The G/L Line Item List contains a selection of Standard Fields from
table BSIS. Vendor Name is not a field in this table. The Special Fieldsthat can be included in the Display Variant come from tables BKPF, BSEC,BSED, BSEG, PAYR, BSEGC and BSBV.
In table BSEG, Vendor Number (BSEG-LIFNR) is only stored in the Vendor
Line Item, not in the G/L Line Item. FAGLL03 cannot display the Vendor
data, since it selects only the G/L Line Items. "
I do not understand all the answer, but I know that I should not have done such customizing, and I do not know who can I rollback my customizing. I would like to go back to the beginning, I would like to have the vendor available and empty as it was at te beginning. I have erased the BSEG-LIFNR from the special fields in DSA and I have transported it to TSA. But after doing that two vendors appeared in FAGLL03 in TSA (one empty as it was at the beginning and the other one shows an error saying that now is not an special field or something like that). I have put again BSEG-LIFNR as special field directly in TSA and vendor disappeared again, then I have erased it in TSA and now it seems to be as it was at the beginning (the field is available and empty). I do not kwow if it is correct to transport to PSA the special fields with vendor erased or not... ¿What should I do? ¿Should I have to erase the BSEG-LIFNR from special fields directly in PSA, should I transport the changes from TSA to PSA to erase BSEG-LIFNR from special fields? ¿If I erase it, am I going to have problems in the future? I am really awared because I do not know if what I have done is going to give us problems in the future with systems upgrades for example...
Thank you really very much,
Ariana

Hi,
I have transported to PSA (our production system) the customizing in order to erase BSEG-LIFNR from special fields, and everything seems to be ok, it seems to be as it was at the beginning. In FAGLL03 I have the field vendor only once and it is blank as it was at the beginning.
Am I going to have problems in the future with system upgrades, for example? I ask this because of what the person of SAP told me in his message.
Thank you very much,
Ariana
Edited by: Ariana Landaluce on Dec 5, 2008 12:36 PM

Can I change a field that is displayed on a Purchase Order Message Output

I have read on a couple message threads that have stated that it is not recommended to change the length of a field on a purchase order. If I am unable to change a field length, can I instead use another field that is long enough to fit in the information and then substitute this field on the message (form) that is output for the purchase order? If so, how do I do this?
I am on SAP r/3 4.6c. I want to substitute field unsez - our reference for verkf - salesperson.

With iTunes Match enabled on your computer and on your iDevices direct sycing is disabled. To add musci to your iDevices it must be in your iTunes library (not necessarily the iTunes Store).
With iTunes Match enabled you will manage the music directly on the iDevice, instead of via iTunes. If you still wish to sync directly you must disable iTunes Match on the iDevice.

Substitute field lifnr

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for