Substitution of Trading partner

Hi all,
it seems i have a little problem. ;o)
We use T-Code KB15N. In this transaction there is no field to put in the trading partner. (VBUND)
So we decided to create a substitution. No problem so far.
But I can only see the informations of the current cost center. Either the sending or the receiving cost center.
So in sending post i can only fill in the trading partner of the sending cost center and the same with the receiving side. But I need in the sending posting part the information of the partner cost center to out in the right trading partner.
Is there any possibility to achieve this?
Thanks for your help in advance.
Philip

It seems, that nobody can help me with this issue.
Due to the new rule of opening only 10 Questions I will close this one.
not answered.

Similar Messages

Substitution for Trading Patrner

Hello All,
I would like to create the substitution for Trading Partner at G/L Item by following issue:-
1)     Check some document types e.g. DR, KR, KZ (Inter-Company)
2)     Check some G/L Account (excluded 100000 - 1099999)
3)     Trading partner in G/L Item should be equal to Trading partner in Vendor/Customer Item
For e.g. If we are posting an entry for document type DR, Customer 1011, trading partner 1010 the trading partner for G/L Item should be 1010
Thanks in advance.

use substitution and create an exit for the mapping of field vbund,
if the mapping is more extensive, use a mapping table
A.

Copy Trading Partner to Asset line items from Vendor line items in F-90

Dear Friends,
I want to copy trading partner field from Vendor line item to other line items like Asset and Tax in T.code - F-90
Client want to use Transaction type - 100
Is it feasible?
Thanks in advance

try:
1) substitution - tcode OBBH
or
2) open FI - menu FIBF tcode BF44
- event 1120 or 1130
A.

DOCUMENT SPILTTING ON BASIS OF TRADING PARTNER(VBUND) FIELD

Dear Friends
We are on ECC 5.0, we have activated document splitting on BUSINESS AREA basis..
As for new requirement for consolidated financial reports, we have also added TRADING PARTNER(vbund) field for document splitting ..
We have define companies(trading partner), assign them to relevant customer and vendor master.
Also have tick INTER COMPANY POSTING AND TRADING PARTNER field in document types(OBA7)
in documents, with vendor and customer relevant line items trading partner is coming automatically..
for G/L related line items we want that trading partner should come automatically through document splitting ..
please note that we cant assign trading partner with G/Ls in chart of accounts as same G/Ls can be used with different different trading partner at the same time..
Kindly help me in this issue..
Regards
Expertia..

Document Splitting is too complex a concept for Substitution. If you have to just copy the Business partner to the missing lines, then you can use substitution. But if you have more than one BP in any entry and the transaction has to generate entries accordingly to balance it, substitution cannot do that.
If you are trying to split on any field other than Business Area, Profit Center and Segment, it involves a lot of work in terms of configuration and development. You have to develop your custom routine to enable splitting on your selected field (VBUND) in your case.
If I remember right, there is a consulting note which explains a brief summary of what is to be done for having Document splitting on custom fields. You can try searching Service Market place.
Ravi.

How to update trading partner (BSEG-VBUND) in tr.code FB01/FB02?

Hi,
I need, under some circumstances, to update value of trading partner code (field BSEG-VBUND) to all items in the FI document, created/changed with transaction FB01/FB02.
I checked available user exits and bussiness events, but didn't found one, which could do the trick.
In fact, in bussiness transaction event #00001430 (CHANGE DOCUMENT: Field substitution header/line - Checks prior to posting change completed) - for FB02 I have access to the internal table T_BSEG, but it seems this table is used as import parameter only and any changes didn't take efect at the end.
Any help how can I do the trick? And this is while I'm in a transaction FB01/FB02.
My system is 4.6c.
Many thanks in advance.
Regards,
Ivaylo Mutafchiev

Svetlin, Max,
what I did until now is:
1) followed matrix substitution = callup point 3 (complete document) - I checked for existance of correct substitution field(s) in the GB01 table, and re-generated substitution code (as noticed in note 42615). That added my field in the list of fields for substtitution which are considered at the end of substtitution - in forms:
FORM EXP_REC_015
        USING
          DATA_CHANGED TYPE GB002_015
        CHANGING
          DATA_OUT TYPE GB002_015.
and
FORM EXP_TAB_015_BSEG
         USING
           IN_ORIG STRUCTURE        BSEG
        CHANGING
           OUT_RESULT STRUCTURE     BSEG
           B_RESULT.
both forms are in main generated program GBTAAFI0.
My field (VBUND) is taken in account - added to the structure:
DATA: BEGIN OF TEMP_STRUCT,
        VBUND                          LIKE   BSEG-VBUND
        ZFBDT                          LIKE   BSEG-ZFBDT
        END OF TEMP_STRUCT.
here ZFBDT was the other field defined in GB01 for substitution from someone esle - perhaps by default, I don't know.
Further (in the include MF05LFB0),
almost all of the structures which contain my changes are cleared (below is extract from the code):
LOOP AT beltab WHERE xarch NE char_x.                   "Note 0383125
REFRESH xbseg.
REFRESH ybseg.
REFRESH xbsec.
REFRESH ybsec.
REFRESH xbsed.
REFRESH ybsed.
REFRESH xbset.
REFRESH ybset.
REFRESH t_bsegco.
REFRESH t_fmfich.
Further, the logic proceed with the program SAPFF011 and form 'import_*beleg', where my changes were overwritten with original data - before substitution.
2) Tried Max's proposal - and extended structure BSEG_SUBST with field VBUND, further populated the substitution table in the related BTE 1430 accordingly.
Unfortunately the flow-logic proceeded further to the same form 'import_*beleg' in the program SAPFF011 and my changes dissapeared.
I'm at dead-end - have no idea where and what is the problem...
Checked few OSS notes - 42615, 386896, 513891, 391309, 438076. Everything which is related to my exact situation is set correctly - as far as I found :-).
Just for tests I tried both ways (BTE and matrix substitution) with another field ==> BSEG-XREF3, and it was updated correctly - accorging to my logic.
Thanks guys, your suggestions were right at the time and valuable, but they didn't help me to solve my problem. Perhaps there is something messed in our system - I can't be sure. What I can say for sure is that we have working BTE-s (1430 is used in our system - I just added piece of code into it), and validations are working also.
Thanks again.
Regards,
Ivaylo
P.S. If you have any suggestions, I'll be glad to hear them from you.

Trading partner related issue

Hello All,
we are in ecc 6.0 .Using Document splitting.
For Intercompany transactions trading partner field is populated.We want to see the trading partner field on the zero balancing line items also i.e in General Ledger View where we have this zero balancing account.How does we populate it on that line item as well.Does standard SAP does that or any User exits or substitutions available for general ledger view in Document splitting????
Any inputs are welcome.Thanks.
Regards,
Sai.

Hi Sai & all guys,
I have a exactly similar problem with 4.7 version with intercompany document posted in SD and trading partner is not getting updated in PCA line item.
All, Let me know if this is clear.... or need further info...
Please I need your help..
Regards,
Vinay

Note 779844 Inheritance of trading partner to line items

hello
I need to apply OSS note 779844. This Note has three steps:
1. A series of source code changes in the system (done through Tx. SNOTE).
2. Modify database table GB01 by adding to boolean class 15, table BSEG, the field VBUND (company)
3.Implement a corresponding FI substitution for the callup point 3 with a user exit in which the required trading partner inheritence logic is implemented.
I have trouble understanding what should be the logic for the point 3, the substitution.
the note say that "the inheritence of the trading partner (VBUND) to allother line items of the other company code also occurs if not all line items of the two company codes (except for the company code clearinglines) contain profit and loss accounts, therefore also if line items with balance accounts are involved in the posting"
The note also says to use the substitution with a user exit. I don't know what user exit I should use.
does anyone applied this note before? can anybody explain to me what logic should I use for the FI substitution?
thanks

Hi Jorge,
I'm in the middle of implementing this SAP note. Just like you, i encountered the same problem.
I don't understand what does the note means for solution no 3.
   "Implement a corresponding FI substitution for the callup point 3 with
   a user exit in which the required trading partner inheritence logic is
    implemented."
If you have found the solution, please share with me.
TQ.

ZBA in EBS - Trading partner issue

Hi SAP gurus
Can anyone help me with how you folks set up populating the trading partner field for ZBA postings in EBS?
I read in a lot of places & here are the pointers I already have.
- We can fill the trading partner field in GL master data assuming we have one GL account for each partner company code (will not work for us as we do not intend to have one GL per company partner)
- We can use BADI to fill up trading partner for the specific document type (dont know what other parameters I have to pick correct trading partner)
- We can use substitution rule for the doc type (dont know what other parameters I have to pick correct trading partner)
- use search string to fill target field (but I do not see Trading partner as target field there)

Solved this issue using the following thread.
Electronic Bank Statements With Assignment field update
Thanks
Morgan

Trading Partner Derivatoin

Dear SAP Gurus,
I have posted debit note (DR) with journal entries:
DR Customer (Trading Partner defalted from Customer Master)
CR Sales
When I saved the document, Trading Partner in the Customer Line Item is defaulted from Customer Master.
However in the Sales line item, I can't see the Trading Partner being populated.
I understand that by allowing the document Type DR and Posting Key 50 to input Trading Partner field during transaction
entry is possible.
I would like to seek clarification, if there's any way that the system can automatically populate the Trading Partner field
in the offstting entires using standard sap feature such as substitution or validation rules, or any other kind os methods.
I appreicate your help in this.
Thanks!

Hi,
Check if your document types have been customized correctly (OBA7):
- Box 'enter trading partner' : for document types that allow intercompany postings
- Box 'Intercompany postings' : for document types that allow the posting of several trading partners in one document => the trading partner has to be entered in each line item that require it. This box should not be activated for invoicing document types (an invoice is mono trading partner)
Regards,
Bernard

Trading partner automatically populated for document type KP

Hi All,
We have two vendor A & B. In vendor A master data we have trading partner maintained & in Vendor B trading partner field is blank. Now when we execute transaction MR11(GR/IR clearing) then trading partner is populated to both the vendor. Which shouldnt be the case. Vendor A should display its trading partner and Vendor B Traidng partner should be blank. but it is displaying Vendor A's trading partner to all the vendor in that particular document.
Can any one help in this issue?

Substitution rule is used for substituting fields with values as required by business. You have to check the rules (by double clicking the line for the co code). please check whether there is any substitution rule created for KP doc type. There will be a pre-requisite (may b in your case doc type KP) and then rule defined saying sub this particular field with trading parter etc. please check thoroughly. You should not deactivate the rule as this must have created for some purpose .
Call point -2 (line item ) means rule should apply for line items in the doc
please reward if helpful
thanks

Intercompany sales/billing - trading partner functionality

Hi Guys,
I understand the theory of trading partner.
But if anyone can give me an example (accounting entries) of trading partner in intercompany sales/billing..that would be very helpful.
Thanks and Regards,
MS

Hi Roman,
As you said, trading partner functionality in SAP is an excellent tool for inter-company transactions and elimination of intercompany payables and receivables for consolidation purposes.
1. The pieces of configuration / master data maintenance you need are:
a. SPRO -> SAP Reference IMG (F5) -> Enterprise Structure -> Definition -> Financial Accounting -> Define Company (OX15)
b. SPRO -> SAP Reference IMG (F5) -> Enterprise Structure -> Assignment -> Financial Accounting -> Assign company code to company (OX16)
c. SPRO -> SAP Reference IMG (F5) -> Financial Accounting -> Financial Accounting Global Settings -> Document -> Document Header -> Define Document Types (OBA7) - Here, for document types you want to use for inter-company postings, you may want to check the checkboxes 'Inter-company postgs' and/or 'Enter trading partner'. Read the SAP Help Documentation on these fields (press F1 when on the field).
d. Create your sister concerns as customers and vendors (preferably under an account group different from your external customers/vendors) and specify the Company you have created in (a) above in the Trading Partner field of Control data tab.
e. Enter Trading Partner in relevant G/L accounts (FS00) in Type/Description tab -> 'Consolidation data in chart of accounts' section.
f. Consider substitution rules (OBBH) for substituting Trading Partner in required transactions.
2. Things to consider for implementing the Trading Partner functionality for entities already performing day to day transactions on SAP.
I am not pretty sure about this, but I guess it is better to go for the change after you end a fiscal year and from the beginning of the next.
3. I think it is better to enable this functionality for everyone on SAP at once.
Good luck!
Srikanth

Problems with Trading partner when settling an internal order

Hi experts,
We are trying to settle an internal order to a G/L account. For this account there is a validation defined, which states error when the trading partner is not entered. Hovewer we cannot change or cancel the validation for business reasons. We cannot use a different G/L account for settlement neither.
Is there any chance to add the trading partner in the order settlement rule? Any other ideas?
Thank you,
Michal

Since you cannot disable the validation and cannot use any other GL account, use a substitution as Sridhar suggested. I am adding to this that trading partner is either assigned at header level or line item level. In this case since it is internal order settlement, I guess it has to be at the header level since it is not cross company. For cross company, the trading partner is automatically filled in so rule that out.
That leaves us with the option of substituting TP at the header level. You can use settlement document type as a condition to bring in a trading partner.
In the worst case if the validation is coming before the substitution kicks in, consider modifying the validation to put exclusions for settlement process, say, use business transaction for example.
Regards
Sharabh

Implementing Trading Partner Functionality

Our business has been on SAP for approximately 7 1/2 years. Over that time there have been many intercompany transactions, but the Trading Partner functionality has never been implemented. Based on my review, Trading Partner appears to be a helpful tool for intercompany transactions. Our business is currently running SAP 4.7. With that:
-What are the pieces that need to be configured to enable Trading Partner (SPRO Transactions or menu paths)?
-What are some things to consider for implementing the Trading Partner functionality for entities already performing day to day transactions on SAP?
-Is it better to enable this functionality for everyone on SAP at once, or on a company code by company code basis?
Thanks in advance for your advice
Roman

Hi Roman,
As you said, trading partner functionality in SAP is an excellent tool for inter-company transactions and elimination of intercompany payables and receivables for consolidation purposes.
1. The pieces of configuration / master data maintenance you need are:
a. SPRO -> SAP Reference IMG (F5) -> Enterprise Structure -> Definition -> Financial Accounting -> Define Company (OX15)
b. SPRO -> SAP Reference IMG (F5) -> Enterprise Structure -> Assignment -> Financial Accounting -> Assign company code to company (OX16)
c. SPRO -> SAP Reference IMG (F5) -> Financial Accounting -> Financial Accounting Global Settings -> Document -> Document Header -> Define Document Types (OBA7) - Here, for document types you want to use for inter-company postings, you may want to check the checkboxes 'Inter-company postgs' and/or 'Enter trading partner'. Read the SAP Help Documentation on these fields (press F1 when on the field).
d. Create your sister concerns as customers and vendors (preferably under an account group different from your external customers/vendors) and specify the Company you have created in (a) above in the Trading Partner field of Control data tab.
e. Enter Trading Partner in relevant G/L accounts (FS00) in Type/Description tab -> 'Consolidation data in chart of accounts' section.
f. Consider substitution rules (OBBH) for substituting Trading Partner in required transactions.
2. Things to consider for implementing the Trading Partner functionality for entities already performing day to day transactions on SAP.
I am not pretty sure about this, but I guess it is better to go for the change after you end a fiscal year and from the beginning of the next.
3. I think it is better to enable this functionality for everyone on SAP at once.
Good luck!
Srikanth

Painter doesn't work with Trading Partner's Business Area COSP-PARGB

Hello,
i valorized field PARGB through FI substitution (Tcode GGB1) and it works fine.
PARGB is valorized in BSEG, COEP and COSP for CO totals records for reporting.
In GR22 i activated PARGB in Characteristics screen for Library 6O1 (internal orders).
I created a report copying standard report 6O01-001 and i put in General Data Selection field PARGB.
The selection screen doesn't work!
The field appears and F1 functionality calls COSP-PARGB and it's correct.
I tried to use fix values rather than variables (standard or custom), but the extraction doesn't work.
The system doesn't filter by Trading partner's Business Area.
Please, does anybody know something in matter?
Thanks,
Regards
Enrico

Hi Sanjit,
I tried to find what you said, but no success.
I made it work in other site, but in my own it doesn't work :S
I'm adding to receive mails in [email protected]
and here goes the site www.meanwhileeverywhere.com
I'll be glad if you help find this missing thing.
Thx!
Johnny Macedo
2014-03-13 14:34 GMT-03:00 Sanjit_Das <[email protected]>:
Re: Muse contact form doesn't work properly with external email
provider created by Sanjit_Das<http://forums.adobe.com/people/Sanjit_Das>in *Help
with using Adobe Muse CC* - View the full discussion<http://forums.adobe.com/message/6206807#6206807

Trading partner in COGS account

Dear FI gurus
For Sales account, Trading partner can be copied from A/R which trading partner is derived from customer master.
But, how about COGS(Cost of Goods Sold) account?
Substitution(EXIT) is required?
(Trace to Sales Order and get value from customer master?)
Yoshi

Hi
You will have to use the substitution rule using exit to populate this from the Customer Master and not the sales order. You can kead this from KNA1 table and populate it in all the GL Line Items where account type =S.
Refer to the link below for using exit in FI Substitution rule
http://wiki.scn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPFI/Creating+user+exits+for+substitutions
Thanks & regards
Sanil Bhandari

Substitution of Trading partner

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for