DOCUMENT SPILTTING ON BASIS OF TRADING PARTNER(VBUND) FIELD

Dear Friends
We are on ECC 5.0, we have activated document splitting on BUSINESS AREA basis..
As for new requirement for consolidated financial reports, we have also added TRADING PARTNER(vbund) field for document splitting ..
We have define companies(trading partner), assign them to relevant customer and vendor master.
Also have tick INTER COMPANY POSTING AND TRADING PARTNER field in document types(OBA7)
in documents, with vendor and customer relevant line items trading partner is coming automatically..
for G/L related line items we want that trading partner should come automatically through document splitting ..
please note that we cant assign trading partner with G/Ls in chart of accounts as same G/Ls can be used with different different trading partner at the same time..
Kindly help me in this issue..
Regards
Expertia..

Document Splitting is too complex a concept for Substitution.  If you have to just copy the Business partner to the missing lines, then you can use substitution.  But if you have more than one BP in any entry and the transaction has to generate entries accordingly to balance it, substitution cannot do that.
If you are trying to split on any field other than Business Area, Profit Center and Segment, it involves a lot of work in terms of configuration and development.  You have to develop your custom routine to enable splitting on your selected field (VBUND) in your case.
If I remember right, there is a consulting note which explains a brief summary of what is to be done for having Document splitting on custom fields.  You can try searching Service Market place.
Ravi.

Similar Messages

  • CANNOT OVERRIDE DOCUMENT ROUTING ID FOR SPECIFIC TRADING PARTNER FOR ROSETT

    Cannot override Document Routing ID for specific trading partner for RosettaNet transactions.
    The Document Routing ID for other transactions types (e.g EDI) can be overridden when creating operation capability for a trading partner by unchecking "Use Existing Document Proto Parameter Values" and "Use Default Document Definition".
    This does not work for RosettaNet transactions as no option to override the values is available when "Use Default Document Definition" is unchecked.

    Hello,
    I have replicated this issue and it appears to be a bug. I shall follow up regarding the same.
    Rgds,Ramesh

  • Trading Partner and Field status Groups

    Hello,
    I've red in previous posts how it's possibile to be mandatory the  trading partner field (VBUND) for G/L acounts.
    At the end; it seems that it could be done with a validation.
    But someone could explain me why it cannot possible to manage this with Field status Groups?
    Thanks in advance
    Alberto

    Hi,
    There are 2 options availabel to populate trading partner 1 is by populating in the GL account master in the initial screen by which you would need to have multiple inter-company accounts. Or you can go to the document type configuration OBA7 and select "enter trading partner " in control data this would populate trading partner in case the inter-company posting is between 2 co codes.
    You would also populate trading patner in the customer and vendor master which are inter-company.
    In scenarios where you have posting in more than one inter-company the system doesnt derive the trading partner there you need to populate the trading partner manually and hence you require a validation to make trading partner for a group of GL accounts.
    Hope this clarifies.
    Thanks and regards
    K.R

  • Trading Partner - Required Field

    Hi Gurus,
    How can i make trading partner as a required field while posting any JV?
    And also, i want to put a validation for profit center and Trading Partner.
    Please revert asap.
    THank YOu

    We have all this configuration set up.  We do automatically get the trading partner populated on the balance sheet side of the entry.  We charge our subsidiaries inter company fees such as interest, management fees, commissions, etc.  We want to have the trading partner populated on these P&L account items as well because we then segregate these types of expenses by company in order to eliminate them in consolidation.  Many of these types of entries are done in GL entry using transaction code FB01 or F-65 to park.  When using these t-codes the trading partner does not get automatically populated in the P&L account item.  We want to make sure they add a trading partner when using these P&L accounts for inter company type expenses.

  • How to update trading partner (BSEG-VBUND) in tr.code FB01/FB02?

    Hi,
    I need, under some circumstances, to update value of trading partner code (field BSEG-VBUND) to all items in the FI document, created/changed with transaction FB01/FB02.
    I checked available user exits and bussiness events, but didn't found one, which could do the trick.
    In fact, in bussiness transaction event #00001430 (CHANGE DOCUMENT: Field substitution header/line - Checks prior to posting change completed) - for FB02 I have access to the internal table T_BSEG, but it seems this table is used as import parameter only and any changes didn't take efect at the end.
    Any help how can I do the trick? And this is while I'm in a transaction FB01/FB02.
    My system is 4.6c.
    Many thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Ivaylo Mutafchiev

    Svetlin, Max,
    what I did until now is:
    1) followed matrix substitution = callup point 3 (complete document) - I checked for existance of correct substitution field(s) in the GB01 table, and re-generated substitution code (as noticed in note 42615). That added my field in the list of fields for substtitution which are considered at the end of substtitution - in forms:
    FORM EXP_REC_015                      
            USING                        
              DATA_CHANGED TYPE GB002_015
            CHANGING                     
              DATA_OUT TYPE GB002_015.
    and
    FORM EXP_TAB_015_BSEG                   
             USING                          
               IN_ORIG STRUCTURE        BSEG
            CHANGING                        
               OUT_RESULT STRUCTURE     BSEG
               B_RESULT.
    both forms are in main generated program GBTAAFI0.
    My field (VBUND) is taken in account - added to the structure:
    DATA:  BEGIN OF TEMP_STRUCT,                          
            VBUND                          LIKE   BSEG-VBUND
            ZFBDT                          LIKE   BSEG-ZFBDT
            END OF TEMP_STRUCT.                            
    here ZFBDT was the other field defined in GB01 for substitution from someone esle - perhaps by default, I don't know.
    Further (in the include MF05LFB0),
    almost all of the structures which contain my changes are cleared (below is extract from the code):
    LOOP AT beltab WHERE xarch NE char_x.                   "Note 0383125
    REFRESH xbseg.                                                     
      REFRESH ybseg.                                                     
      REFRESH xbsec.                                                     
      REFRESH ybsec.                                                     
      REFRESH xbsed.                                                     
      REFRESH ybsed.                                                     
      REFRESH xbset.                                                     
      REFRESH ybset.                                                     
      REFRESH t_bsegco.                                                  
      REFRESH t_fmfich.                                                  
    Further, the logic proceed with the program SAPFF011 and form 'import_*beleg', where my changes were overwritten with original data - before substitution.
    2) Tried Max's proposal - and extended structure BSEG_SUBST with field VBUND, further populated the substitution table in the related BTE 1430 accordingly.
    Unfortunately the flow-logic proceeded further to the same form 'import_*beleg' in the program SAPFF011 and my changes dissapeared.
    I'm at dead-end - have no idea where and what is the problem...
    Checked few OSS notes - 42615, 386896, 513891, 391309, 438076. Everything which is related to my exact situation is set correctly - as far as I found :-).
    Just for tests I tried both ways (BTE and matrix substitution) with another field ==> BSEG-XREF3, and it was updated correctly - accorging to my logic.
    Thanks guys, your suggestions were right at the time and valuable, but they didn't help me to solve my problem. Perhaps there is something messed in our system - I can't be sure. What I can say for sure is that we have working BTE-s (1430 is used in our system - I just added piece of code into it), and validations are working also.
    Thanks again.
    Regards,
    Ivaylo
    P.S. If you have any suggestions, I'll be glad to hear them from you.

  • Trading Partner in Gain and Loss from valuation

    Dear Friends,
    My issue is with the valuation posted for account maintained on line item basis only (Not open item managment).  Since the account is maintained on line item basis, only balance is valuated each month thru f.05.
    The problem is that when account posted with Loss or Gain each month on valuation, the document will not have a Trading partner assigned which causes my inter-company elimination issue.
    How to get Trading partner assigned to document posted on valuation (F.05) I have tried sustitution rule and OB32 to make Trading Partner as editable but SAP does not allow both.
    Best Regards
    VK

    Thanks Venkata,
    My problem is with the autmated posting result from forex gain or loss when carrying F.05. These documents autmatically created but donot update the Trading Partner. I can not manually input them even if enter Trading Partner is option in OBA7 is checked.
    Best Regards
    VK

  • Issue with trading partner

    Hi ,
    I have a issue with trading partner,
    While clearing the bank clearing account with bank main account user has got the below error
    "Consolidated companies ' ' are different"
    The issue is because u201CTrading Partneru201D, document number xxxx has the trading partner.
    I have given the below solution to client,
    Proposed solution:
    Reverse the payment & invoice documents
    Edit the vendor master data (Remove the trading partner from vendor master data)
    Re-post the invoice
    Do the payment document
    Now client does not want to revere the document, do we have any other way to do this?
    Regards,
    Sridhar

    Hi Sridhar,
    if you make wrong entry in VBUND, it is necessary to REVERSE the document first and re-post with the correct VBUND information.  BSEG-VBUND is one of the important organizational fields which should be managed in the same manner as company code, business area etc. These organizational fields cannot/should not be changed.
    Please refer to note 4152, which provides valuable information on why
    the error F5080 arises in your system.
    Also please consider the following points:
    There is also another note, 109925, which describes in detail the
    possibility to transfer, into all the line items, the trading partner.
    Use
    o  If you want the trading partner to be transferred to all line items,
        do NOT set this indicator.
    The System behaviour is the following one:
    1) Both indicators switched OFF:
    If a trading partner is maintained in G/L, vendor or customer master
    record, VBUND is copied to all document lines. VBUND is unique
    in FI-document.
    2) Indicator "Multiple companies" switched ON and indicator
    "Enter trading partner" switched OFF:
    The company ID (= trading partner) is not inherited to other items for
    document types that allow cross-company postings.
    3) Indicator "Multiple companies" switched ON and indicator
    "Enter trading partner" switched ON:
    You can enter a trading partner when posting to a G/L account and in
    the G/L master record, no trading partner is stored.
    In this case, the company ID specified manually is entered in all
    line items that not yet received a company code from the customer
    or vendor master record.
    Kind Regards,
    Mateus

  • Posting of Trading partner FB01 via BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST

    Folks,
    I have written ABAP code to create accounting document in SAP from excel . My requirement is to give trading partner (VBUND) in the sheet which will be processed by SAP. now i am using BAPI "BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST " to upload entries in SAP but i can not find table fields in BAPI to map trading partner field . can any one throw light on this. I guess i may have to EXTENSION2 in this BAPI , can any one tell how to use thatg.
    Regards.

    Hi,
    Check this structure 'BAPIACGL09'
    fields
    PART_ACCT       JV_PART     CHAR     10     Partner account number
    TR_PART_BA       PARGB         CHAR     4     Trading partner's business area
    TRADE_ID                  RASSC                     CHAR     6              Company ID of trading partner
    Regards
    Krishna
    Edited by: Krishna Gowrneni on Apr 22, 2009 12:35 AM
    Edited by: Krishna Gowrneni on Apr 22, 2009 12:36 AM

  • Business/Trading Partner in Bank Analyzer GL connector

    Hello
    We want to send the business/trading partner (vbund)from core banking via bank analyzer to FI-GL using the GL connector/extractor. This info we need for consolidation preparation (elimination of intercompany sales). Does Bank Analyzer 6.0 contain this data?
    Regards
    Arjan

    Hi,
    Once you assign Trading Partner to Counterparty it will be automatically filled in the posting document. You can check in FBL3N/FBL5N display by including field Trading Partner.
    Regards
    Prasad AV

  • Trading partner in B/S reports

    by afanda on Thu Apr 22, 2010 11:14 am
    Hi
    We plan to start use the field trading partner, to easier eliminate between our subsidiary
    I have created the trading partner, and added them to customer and vendor master.
    So when I make transactions I got the field populated.
    For ex when I look on the document in FB03 I see that the trading partner field is populated, both on B/S and P/L accounts.
    I also have managed to create reports in GR55 (GLPCT) and see the amount on trading partner on the P/L account.
    My problem is to see them on the B/S account
    Can anyone tell me what Standard report I can run on BS account or do I have to create a query or what?
    I donu2019t find the field trading partner (VBUND) where I also se transactions on B/S accounts.
    Anyone who can help me with that?
    Thanks!

    Dear Ravin,
    How can we maintain different Trading Partners in Customer Master when we have only one field and only one value can be maintained.
    Any other suggestion please.
    with regards,
    Dayanand

  • Unable to update Partner Unit in Eccs with Trading Partner from FI

    Hi,
    I had removed the Breakdown category from the FS item Master (CX14) for a reco Acct by mistake .Now when i update the master table in CX14 with the same Break down Category(0110 - Partner Unit (break down Type-4) + Translation Currency (break down type -2)) the sytem than gives a pop up window showing the "Report for Transaction Check" where it asks for the Default Value of Partner Unit to be entered.Once i maintain the default value of partner unit all the document for the reco account gets updated with default Partner unit.However in FI module each of the documents posted for this account have diffrent Trading Partner due to which im unable to do the Interunit Elimination.
    Kindly let me know how do i update Partner unit in all the documents in Consolidation with the trading Partner from FI module.
    thanks
    Karan

    Once i maintain the default value of partner unit all the document for the reco account gets updated
    this system behavior makes sense as you are trying to change configuration after loading transaction data. what happens if you go back to the underlying accounts and change TP back to what FI is showing? if u have to deal with a lot of documents u may want to set up a BDC session to do the mass update.

  • Trading partner related issue

    Hello All,
    we are in ecc 6.0 .Using Document splitting.
    For Intercompany transactions trading partner field is populated.We want to see the trading partner field on the zero balancing line items also i.e in General Ledger View where we have this zero balancing account.How does we populate it on that line item as well.Does standard SAP does that or any User exits or substitutions available for general ledger view in Document splitting????
    Any inputs are welcome.Thanks.
    Regards,
    Sai.

    Hi Sai & all guys,
    I have a exactly similar problem with 4.7 version with intercompany document posted in SD and trading partner is not getting updated in PCA line item.
    All, Let me know if this is clear.... or need further info...
    Please I need your help..
    Regards,
    Vinay

  • Note 779844 Inheritance of trading partner to line items

    hello
    I need to apply OSS note 779844. This Note has three steps:
    1. A series of source code changes in the system (done through Tx. SNOTE).
    2. Modify database table GB01 by adding to boolean class 15, table BSEG, the field VBUND (company)
    3.Implement a corresponding FI substitution for the callup point 3 with a user exit in which the required trading partner inheritence logic is implemented.
    I have trouble understanding what should be the logic for the point 3, the substitution.
    the note say that "the inheritence of the trading partner (VBUND) to allother line items of the other company code also occurs if not all line items of the two company codes (except for the company code clearinglines) contain profit and loss accounts, therefore also if line items with balance accounts are involved in the posting"
    The note also says to use the substitution with a user exit. I don't know what user exit I should use.
    does anyone applied this note before? can anybody explain to me what logic should I use for the FI substitution?
    thanks

    Hi Jorge,
    I'm in the middle of implementing this SAP note. Just like you, i encountered the same problem.
    I don't understand what does the note means for solution no 3.
       "Implement a corresponding FI substitution for the callup point 3 with
       a user exit in which the required trading partner inheritence logic is
        implemented."
    If you have found the solution, please share with me.
    TQ.

  • Trading partner is not populated on G/L accounts

    Dear All,
    We have activated trading partners.
    When the SD document is posted only customer account documents are getting populated with "trading partner".
    However - "trading partner" is not copied to G/L account.(revenue accounts, cost of goods sold).
    Is there any standard SAP solution to solve this?
    Best regards,
    Mark

    No this will not have influence on other areas which are not inter-company. But if you want the system to default the trading partner from one line to all other lines in a document with trading partner, then you have to de-activate this switch.
    And if you have a scenario when you are posting to more than one trading partners within a single document, then you shouldn't use this document type. You should use then document type with the Inter-co switch on and system will expect you to manually inter the trading partners in the off-set G/L accounts. This inter-co switch is a little misnomer.
    I have refreshed my log-in, you can try the point assignments now.
    Thanks
    Ron

  • Customer/Vendor Trading Partner

    Hi,
    I´ve to add in all the Customer / Vendor of my company the corresponding Trading Partner.
    You know if exits a collective transaction in order to make it instead of used XK03 and XD03?
    KR
    Jorge.

    Hi:
            For mass update of trading partner VBUND in customer master data  you can process this field in XD99...General Data in Customer Master...KNA1 & for vendor master data mass change XK99...Vendor Master (General Section)...LFA1.. Alternatively you can create LSMW for the same.
    Regards

Maybe you are looking for

  • How print  ADDRESSbook simple list? Everything prints scewd right &too long

    I'd liike to print out a simple list of names, phone, addresses from my mac AddressBook. Can't I design the layout? Prints first left 1/3 column jjust phone number, center column just name, and all the other info squeezed at the riight margin with se

  • OO Interactive ALV Problem

    I have an OO ALV program that allows the User to change fields in the display and then it will update a data base when they click on the SAVE button.  I need to have an edit to check two fields both of which have the value 'X' or ' '.  I need to edit

  • Hatching columns & selecting data

    Hello, I have two questions: 1) I have drawn a chart in numbers '09 and instead of using a colour fill, or 'texture' fill, I want to use hatching because the chart is going to printed in a black and white publication. I can't find how to do hatching

  • Flash Videos won't play, or continuously load forever.

    I've seen so many questions about this over the internet asked many different ways and has been offered many different solutions that I've tried, but never can seem to find a solution! The problem is with flash videos not working in Firefox. The prob

  • DMM LDAP Administrator Rights

    In the documentation for DMM 5.2.X, there doesn't seem to be any information on what rights need to be given to the Administrator for the LDAP integration.  The environment that I am configuring for is very security conscience and will want to give t