Supported Smart Card List

Is there an up to date list of supported smart cards for Sun Ray? I'm looking for both the standard contact type and the contactless type.
Thanks

check out http://www.sun-rays.org/srss-smartcards.html.
we have added in an smartcard test with Sun Ray another 2 providers like http://www.athena-scs.com/product.asp?pid=22 and austrian E-Card.
regards, thomas

Similar Messages

  • Cisco ISE Guest portal - smart card login

    Does anyone know if Cisco ISE support smart card login to the guest portal page?                    

    No it doesn't, you can test the same , while editing the wireless SSID profile, opting authentication method as smart card other than PEAP/EAP.

  • List of supported CUDA Cards (CS5)

    Adobe is working on a playback and rendering engine for Adobe  Premiere Pro called the Mercury Playback Engine. This new engine is  NVIDIA® GPU-accelerated, 64-bit native, and architected for the future.  Native 64-bit support enables you to work more fluidly on HD and higher  resolution projects, and GPU acceleration speeds effects processing and  rendering.
    The Mercury Playback Engine offers these  benefits:
    Open projects faster, refine  effects-rich HD and higher resolution sequences in real time, enjoy  smooth scrubbing, and play back complex projects without rendering.
    See  results instantly when applying multiple color corrections and effects  across many video layers.
    Work in real time on complex timelines  and long-form projects with thousands of clips — whether your project  is SD, HD, 2K, 4K, or beyond.
    Ensure your system  is ready to take advantage of the Mercury Playback Engine in a future  version of Adobe Premiere Pro. The Mercury Playback Engine works  hand-in-hand with NVIDIA® CUDA™ technology to give you amazingly fluid,  real-time performance. See  it in action
    * PR CS5 supports the  following list of CUDA cards:
    GeForce GTX 285
    Windows and MAC
    Quadro FX 3800
    Windows
    Quadro FX 4800
    Windows and MAC
    Quadro FX 5800
    Windows
    Quadro CX
    Windows
    More  hardware details:
    http://www.adobe.com/products/premiere/systemreqs/
    [Moderator's Note: the discussion about Adobe's choices for supported cards was moved to the Premiere Pro Main Forum]
    Link

    Paste of Post by Will Renczes (Adobe)
    http://forums.adobe.com/message/2739509#2739509
    >>>
    Now that the launch is done and this information is all public, I'm going to summarize all the bits of information that have been floating around into one distilled post:
    The Mercury playback engine comprises of 3 areas (our chief weapons are surprise, surprise and fear...  nevermind...):
    - 64 bit support, and better memory management / frame cache management / sharing between the Adobe apps (ie Premiere and After Effects & the Media Encoder have a notion of shared memory now, and are aware of how much is being consumed by their peers);
    - optimizations to multithreaded rendering, to the playback's pipeline, speed improvements with various media types, and all around general fine tuning
    - CUDA acceleration of effects / transforms / pixel conversion routines.
    Don't have a supported CUDA board?  You still get two out of three.  Might not seem as sexy on the cover, but CS5 is still a massive improvement over CS4 even without the hardware acceleration.
    (Conversely:  let me dispel the myth that you can drop in a CUDA supported board into any box and you magically get umpteen layers of RED 4K in realtime.  All that CUDA does is free the CPU from the tasks of doing image processing - video footage however still needs to be decoded by the CPU.  If you're looking to do high end 4K, do yourself a favor and don't shortchange yourself on a cruddy box.  Get an i7, for cryin' out loud...  but I digress)
    Now, why the limited card selection?
    One of the biggest themes was to improve stability and making Premiere truly earn the Pro moniker.  To quote another engineer, "This was a decision about being Pro."  By limiting the selection of cards, you have a guarantee that the product will do what it's supposed to, that your rendering accuracy will be as good as in software, and that these cards will play nice with 3rd party I/O vendors.
    What's the difference between the level of functionality I get with the GTX 285 vs the Quadro boards?
    The GTX is limited to 3 streams of realtime.  Also, the Quadros come with more memory, so this helps if you're looking to do hi-res (eg RED) editing. Lastly, as a gaming card set, the GTX cards will downclock themselves if they're overheating, so your performance might drop if your cooling isn't the best.  The Quadros OTOH have a fixed clock rate, assumingly they have better heat tolerance levels.
    When will that selection expand?
    TBD.  All I will say is that we are looking at some of the next-gen Fermi cards, but they're still undergoing evaluation.  Let's put it this way - the beta users group is still running so that they can help test the new card support going forward.   Keep your ear to the ground, I'm sure there will be plenty of noise made when they're announced.
    Can you add me to the beta list?
    Nope.  Not my domain, I'm afraid.
    What's the scoop with ATI cards, and openCL?  Why nVidia / CUDA only?
    When the acceleration work began over a year & a half ago, openCL wasn't even a finalized specification.  CUDA was a more mature technology, so that's what we went with.  For the future? It'll be evaluated for CS 6.

  • Pr CS5 - List of supported CUDA Cards

    Adobe is working on a playback and rendering engine for Adobe Premiere Pro called the Mercury Playback Engine. This new engine is NVIDIA® GPU-accelerated, 64-bit native, and architected for the future. Native 64-bit support enables you to work more fluidly on HD and higher resolution projects, and GPU acceleration speeds effects processing and rendering.
    The Mercury Playback Engine offers these benefits:
    Open projects faster, refine effects-rich HD and higher resolution sequences in real time, enjoy smooth scrubbing, and play back complex projects without rendering.
    See results instantly when applying multiple color corrections and effects across many video layers.
    Work in real time on complex timelines and long-form projects with thousands of clips — whether your project is SD, HD, 2K, 4K, or beyond.
    Ensure your system is ready to take advantage of the Mercury Playback Engine in a future version of Adobe Premiere Pro. The Mercury Playback Engine works hand-in-hand with NVIDIA® CUDA™ technology to give you amazingly fluid, real-time performance. See it in action
    * PR CS5 supports the following list of CUDA cards:
    GeForce GTX 285
    Windows and MAC
    Quadro FX 3800
    Windows
    Quadro FX 4800
    Windows and MAC
    Quadro FX 5800
    Windows
    Quadro CX
    Windows
    More hardware details:
    http://www.adobe.com/products/premiere/systemreqs/

    Hi
    I agree....also having the GTX260. It looks as if Nvidia and Adobe has made some kind of agreement, so one have to buy an expensive new Nvidia card to get the new mercury engine to run properly in Ppro CS5. I write this because I have read that fx. the GTX 260 is allmost similar to the Quadro CX - same chips etc. - but we can not expect either Adobe or Nvidia to give us customers presents - like making the mercury engine available to all CUDA enabled Nvidia cards....that does not make business - only happy customers....
    But I can not wait for Adobe to support GTX260 in CS5. I need better performance right now editing AVCHD quicker and more smooth. Have had tons of issues the last year trying to get things running just reasonable with PPro CS4. I have i7 920 with 2 x SATA 1 TB disks and 12 GB RAM, Windows 7 Pro 64 bit and GTX 260 and in CS4 I can only preview AVCHD files without any kind of effects or tranisitions. Just a simple transition and PPro starts having problems playing back properly. CS4 crashes from time to time - not seriously - but it have to think a lot about almost everything some times....But there are no alternatives to Ppro unless you will spend a lot more money.
    So I get stucked to PPro - and actually looks a bit forward to see what PPro CS5 can do...hope my AVCHD editting will be less frustrating. But it will certainly cost me some money and make Adobe and NVidia more happy than my bankaccount.
    Anyway - what I am interested in knowing is how much difference are there between the cards supported when it comes to performance etc.? Is the Quadro CX worth buying instead of the Quadro FX3800? Or what about the FX4800? Is it so much better than the FX3800? I need more specific details and tests of how things works with these supported cards. It makes no sense that Adobe just writes that these cards are supported - we nedd to know how they perform too.
    I can only see the technical details about the cards - but there are no information anywhere about how the cards perform compared to each other - when it comes to playback, rendering speed etc. in PPro CS5?
    Adobe and Nvidia must have done some tests? Everytime we see how great the new Mercury engine works it is showed on a high class system with Quadro CX. But what if we showed the same work on a medium class system - say i7 920 with 8-12 GB ram and a GTX 285? Or is it not worth showing anyone - does it perform better or worse or is it almost the same? No one knows....only Adobe and Nvidia. But they won´t tell?
    Are there any BETA-tester out there who have had the oppertunity to try things out with different cards?
    I am honestly being quite tired of upgrading all the time...spended 4000$ on a new system last year - this year have to spend the same - just on CS5 upgrade and a new videocard....boy, am I a happy customer?
    Morten
    Denmark

  • Support for smart-card authentication in PowerBuilder based application

    Hi, I have an application on PB11.5 with an Oracle DB back-end (11.2g). My DoD customer wants the application to use their DoD CAC Card (Smart Card) to authenticate against the Enterprise - Windows Active Directory domain, currently the application uses user-id\password for user authentication.  Is this something newer versions of PB can support and implement? Thank you.

    You have a couple of choices:
    1.  Depending on how old their workstations are, or if they have ACTIVCLIENT installed, you could call the CAPICOMM ActiveX using OLE commands
    2.  A solution that doesn't require that ActiveX is to use the Smart Card SDK built into newer versions of Windows.  It does require a lot lower level coding though, as you have to issue specific APDU commands to the card and know how to handle the responses.
    I posted a sample of the latter to the NNTP groups back in 2011.  I suppose I should get around to creating a blog entry explaining how to use it.

  • List of supported nVidia cards (Premiere Pro CS6)

    Hi all--
    I can't seem to locate the latest list of supported nVidia cards.  (For Mercury engine)
    The only list I could find contains no 6-series nVidia cards!  That can't be right!
    Can someone point to the latest list?

    Good of you to mention that. No, PPBM5 does not have info on driver versions and the like. For the new PPBM6 test I am working on a new way to submit results. It is all explained here: http://ppbm7.com/index.php/instructions?showall=&start=1
    If you follow these instructions about Speccy now, you can open the Graphics section to see the driver version in use. So I intend to have those data about driver version, as well as lots of other data that can be relevant, available in the new version.
    Thanks for this question. It is very relevant to our script to parse out the Speccy results before submission.

  • Reg. smart cards which support T=1 protocol

    Hi
    Would like to know what all smart cards support T=1 protocol?
    Thanks

    I'm trying sometimes to get out where some ppl learned to write in this lang .....
    Dear,
    I can't realy understand whatabout your question is. Normally, all of the cards with contact interface do support T=1.
    Just if you have bad luck and there is no that shiny thing on one side, well, you can bet you are holding either T=CL, Mifare or FeliCa card....

  • Official list of supported graphics cards for HP IPISB-CH2 motherboard

    Hi,
    Is there any official list of supported graphics cards for HP motherboards (specifically HP IPISB-CH2 (Chicago))?
    I've been trying to upgrade my graphics for MSI GTX 960, but found out the MB's BIOS (v. 7.12) is incompatible and there's no BIOS upgrade available that would solve this problem. I have returned the 960 and wanted to try the GTX 660, but a few people told me they've also been having BIOS compatibility issues with this one.
    The only info I found was that the MB "Supports PCI Express x16 graphics cards" (source: http://support.hp.com/us-en/document/c02854392 ) - which is a very insufficient description (as the GTX 960 meets it and doesn't work anyway).

    Hi,
    There are three versions of the motherboard, in the official web site  can see that detail parts, desktops using IPISB-CH2 (Chicago) from factory, and video cards are installed on them.
    Another thing to keep in mind is that if the graph is more powerful requiring a power of more watts.
    Examples:
    http://partsurfer.hp.com/Search.aspx?SearchText=H0C37EA
    http://partsurfer.hp.com/Search.aspx?type=PROD&SearchText=A5U33AAR

  • Compiling rdesktop with Smart Card support?

    Hello,
    I've tried like the dikens to compile "rdesktop" (an open source solution to connect Windoze PCs using Microsoft RDP protocol). I can compile and run the source code, but I find it impossible to compile in smart card support. I've tried everything to get the "pcsc-lite" components to compile in - but I'm too much of a makefile noob I'm afraid.
    Anyone know how to do this?
    There's a related discussion at http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=8652963.
    Any help appreciated
    ~Matt

    Hi,
    Thank you for posting in Windows Server Forum.
    In a Remote Desktop scenario, a user is using a remote server for running services, and the smart card is local to the computer that the user is using. In a smart card logon scenario, the smart card service on the remote server redirects to the smart card reader
    connected to the local computer where the user is trying to log on. You can refer following article for details.
    Smart Card and Remote Desktop Services
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ff404286(v=ws.10).aspx
    Hope it helps!
    Thanks.
    Dharmesh Solanki
    TechNet Community Support

  • PIV II Contactless Smart Card Support with Blackberry 10 Devices?

    I've seen documents describing NFC smart card support and ISO 14443 compliance in Blackberry 10 software and devices, but this doesn't really make it clear... Does the NFC support in BlackBerry 10 devices allow it to use certificates on a PIV II contactless smart card (which follows ISO 14443) for signing and encryption of e-mail? (without needing the separate Bluetooth-connected BlackBerry smart card reader)

    OK, undestood, I am neither of those. Just a user.
    POP email does not push instantly. I will tell you what another user here commented in another thread... any business now a days that is still on POP email is somewhat like using candles to light your offices. You need to be on IMAP.
    Perhaps you can check and see what it would take to convert. In most cases, it should be simple.
    And if you do, ASK if that IMAP has PUSH enabled.
    Or in naval terms... like sticking with a sail as the lastest technology when steam propulsion is available.
    1. If any post helps you please click the below the post(s) that helped you.
    2. Please resolve your thread by marking the post "Solution?" which solved it for you!
    3. Install free BlackBerry Protect today for backups of contacts and data.
    4. Guide to Unlocking your BlackBerry & Unlock Codes
    Join our BBM Channels (Beta)
    BlackBerry Support Forums Channel
    PIN: C0001B7B4   Display/Scan Bar Code
    Knowledge Base Updates
    PIN: C0005A9AA   Display/Scan Bar Code

  • SCCM 2012 SP1 Remote Control Smart Card Support?

    Hi,
    We're currently running SCCM 2012 SP1.  We have implemented mandatory smart card login on our Win 7 workstations using GPO.  Is it correct to say that SCCM's Remote Control Viewer does not support passing of smart card credentials through the session? 
    Our testing thus far would indicate that it does not.  This is problematic for our help desk that often uses the Remote Viewer to connect to end user machines and then elevate rights to perform admin level tasks.  So far the only way we have developed
    to work around it is to run a script that temporarily changes the GPO to remove the smart card enforcement requirement.  Is there a better way to address this issue?
    Thanks
    Josh

    Just to add to Wally's comments, there's actually no way this will ever happen without significant investments and development time (if it's possible at all) and it's really not anything that the ConfigMgr product group could implement as it has to with
    authentication which is handled by the OS. Passing smart card credentials across the network is inherently flawed and poses a huge security risk. When this was discussed internally at Microsoft, the security teams there said they could easily hack any mechanism
    that tried to do this and compromise the credentials.
    The recommendation from Microsoft is to use local admin accounts on workstations for elevation. This goes for *any* type of remote control (including remote desktop btw) because the same security weakness exists regardless of the remote tool being used.
    Jason | http://blog.configmgrftw.com

  • HP Elite Book Alcor Micro Smart Card Reader FDE PBA Support?

    Can someone tell me if the HP Elite Book Alcor Micro Smart Card Reader supported byFDE PBA Supports in ZCM11SP2 ?
    Thanks
    Kuru

    eumetsatzcm,
    It appears that in the past few days you have not received a response to your
    posting. That concerns us, and has triggered this automated reply.
    Has your problem been resolved? If not, you might try one of the following options:
    - Visit http://support.novell.com and search the knowledgebase and/or check all
    the other self support options and support programs available.
    - You could also try posting your message again. Make sure it is posted in the
    correct newsgroup. (http://forums.novell.com)
    Be sure to read the forum FAQ about what to expect in the way of responses:
    http://forums.novell.com/faq.php
    If this is a reply to a duplicate posting, please ignore and accept our apologies
    and rest assured we will issue a stern reprimand to our posting bot.
    Good luck!
    Your Novell Product Support Forums Team
    http://forums.novell.com/

  • Does Java Card 2 API support all the smart card?

    Does Java Card 2 API support all the smart card? I guess all the java cards are smart card but all the smart card are not java card. so Java card 2 API supports only java card. It does not support all the smart card. Please somebody let me know wheather I am correct or not. Because I want to make an application which supports all the smart card. I am confuse wheather I have to use JavaCard API or OCF or any other framework/API. Please help me. Thanks

    I am clear with java card.
    But I want to make an application which can verify the PIN inside card and read logon certificate, which is saved inside card. Is there any framework which I can use to full fill my simple requiremnt. I dont want to deal with any applet inside card.

  • Need a recommendation about java smart card and a reader

    I've been posting some message in this forum and others and haven't gotten a clear response.
    I want to experiment with java smart card technology.
    From what I gathered, Gemplus is a leading company in this field so I thought about buying a smart card reader from it and a java smart card.
    I thought about buying the "USB Smart Card Reader/Writer Plug n Play (GemPC430)" reader which costs 69$.
    Is this a reasonable price?
    I need an answer from someone with experience using it.
    Now then, which one should I buy?
    I only want to do smart card to desktop application interaction without anything on the web (e-commerce or anything to do with encryption).
    I can buy 5 "GS2.2 Standard Crypto GPK8000su512 RED"
    cards which cost 87.50$
    THATS A LOT OF MONEY!!!!
    Are all java smart cards that expensive?
    There is a list of other cards on their site but I haven't been able to locate their price and don't know which to buy.
    Finally, there is the "Kit, GemSAFE Enterprise Workstation 2.21 Standard Cryptography Serial Port Reader" which as I read consists a GPK8000 card.
    Is this card a java card?
    Or do I need to buy the reader and java card seperately.
    Any help and insight would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks.

    I've looked closely at the Cyberflex 32K cards + SDK from Schlumberger.
    My criteria was:
    * Javacard 2.1 support
    * visa open support (or whatever it is called now)
    * complete sdk (develop, test, deploy)
    * exportable
    * upgradable
    * customer support
    I tried to get someone from Gemplus to contact me, but was unable to ever get even an
    email response.
    Schlumberger, on the other hand, won me over with the quick responses over email.
    They offer fairly inexpensive upgrades after you buy the product, and technical support
    is free.
    For simple experimentation, you can get the JavaCard SDK for free. At JavaOne, several
    years ago, they were giving away JavaRings with Card Readers (which presumably
    means these are cheap to buy) from SCM or some company in Texas. You might
    try to get one of these. They don't have much memory, but are an interesting twist
    on the Java Card thing.
    If you want to dive in, the Smart Card SDK from Schlumberger will run you about $499.
    This includes the reader, 5 cards, and the SDK. Likewise, Metrowerks puts out an
    IDE for Java Card which runs about $1200, and may be available as a bundle from
    vendors like Schlumberger.
    dk

  • Smart Card setup in 10.6.4

    Hello,
    I am working on an iMac running 10.6.4. I am trying to get a smartcard (Athena ASEKey USB Token) to be recognized by the system. Note: this smartcard is not for local system authentication. It is for authentication through a remote desktop connection to a Windows terminal server. I was able to get it working in 10.5.x without too much difficulty. The procedure for getting it working in 10.5.x was as follows:
    1. Modify /etc/authorization as specified in the Apple Smart Card Setup Guide.
    (This is available at Http://images.apple.com/server/macosx/docs/SmartCard_SetupGuide.pdf)
    2. Compile driver with Xcode
    3. Copy driver to /usr/libexec/SmartCardServices/drivers/
    4. Compile rdesktop 1.6.0 with smart card support
    I'm not sure what has changed in 10.6.x to cause this not to work. It appears as though the device is recognized as it appears in the System Profiler under USB when it is plugged in. Any insight will be greatly appreciated. Thank you!
    Message was edited by: NetAdmins

    I'm trying to make work my Smart Card either. I've looking around the web and seems a matter of luck - you have a combination system-hardware that works or not. People download drivers, installers, library stuff and the card remains away from here. Most of cases is only to access home banking, almost all require smart cards or you only can see, but not to touch.
    My VASCO DP905 is listed in USB devices at system profile. I'd install SCA packages from opensc as manufacturer says, but both browsers Safari and FireFox says Applet SmartCardX notinitiated (or notloaded in FF).
    In FireFox you can install the device "by hand", but still won't work. In Safari I don't know how to manage this kind stuff.
    It's amazing how hard is to make work such simple device, don't you think?

Maybe you are looking for