Suppress triggers

Hi experts,
can you please confirm why supresstriggers is not working on OGG 11.2 build
my oracle database is 11.2.0.3 but its throwing error like, this version is not supporting this parameter error...

Did you do all of the set up steps?
Valid for Replicat for Oracle. Controls whether or not
triggers are fired during the Replicat session.
SUPPRESSTRIGGERS prevents triggers from firing on target
objects that are configured for replication with Oracle
GoldenGate.
Instead of manually disabling the triggers, you can use
SUPPRESSTRIGGERS for these Oracle versions:
◆ Oracle 10.2.0.5 and later patches to 10.2.0.5
◆ Oracle 11.2.0.2 and later 11gR2 versions
SUPPRESSTRIGGERS is not available for 11gR1.
To use SUPPRESSTRIGGERS, the Replicat user must be an
Oracle Streams administrator, which can be granted by
invoking the following:
For Oracle 10.2.0.5 and patches, use:
dbms_streams_auth.grant_admin_privilege
For Oracle 11gR2 versions, use:
dbms_goldengate_auth.grant_admin_privilege
These procedures are part of the Oracle database
installation. See the database documentation for more
information.
NOSUPPRESSTRIGGERS is the default and allows target
triggers to fire.
The SOURCEDB and USERID parameters must precede a
DBOPTIONS statement that contains SUPPRESSTRIGGERS.

Similar Messages

Use of KEY-OTHERS trigger

Hi,
I have a form that has numerous triggers defined at the form level. The form has a block that appears in a dialog window. The block should only have a small subset of triggers that are defined at the form level. I went ahead and created the key triggers necessary at the block level; I also defined a key-others trigger defined as null on the block to disable all other key triggers defined at the form level???. However it's not working, key triggers at the form level are still firing. Is the key-others trigger suppose to suppress triggers at a lower level or do I have to specifically deactivate all the key triggers at the block level?
Thanks for you help in advance

Key-Others at the block level will only override a form-level Key-Others. It will not override any other form-level triggers.
You must either override all the form-level triggers at the block level, or add code to the beginning of each form-level trigger such as:
If :System.trigger_block = 'MY_SPECIAL_BLOCK' then
Return; -- exit if in the special block
End if;

Automatic Trigger of Idoc Sending to PI on Material Master Create/Change

Hi All,
I would like to ask how to automatically trigger sending of idoc on material master create/change without using a standard transaction like BD10. I already tried using MASTER_IDOC_DISTRIBUTE in the material master change user exit. It does send the idoc but my problem is when an inbound idoc creates a material, it will then pass through the userexit and use MASTER_IDOC_DISTRIBUTE again.
Any suggestions? Or do you have a better solution for this? My requirement is when uer goes throgh MM01/MM02 an idoc will automatically be sent to PI.
Thanks.

First of all a quick comment to your present solution. If it works and your only problem is that you'd like to suppress triggering the IDoc creation when a material is created/updated via inbound IDoc then you might want to just fix that. There's many possible ways to approach this, it all depends how much you want to change and what your processes are (I sorted the listed ones in order of personal preference, though the list is not complete for sure):
<ul style="list-style:circle;">
<li>Export some flag to memory when processing an IDoc that you can import in your exit and thus recognize that you don't want to send an IDoc. Depending on how you are processing your inbound IDoc BAdI BADI_MATMAS_ALE_IN might work; you might find others if this is not applicable or sufficient. If you're working on ECC 6.0 you could also consider coding the export of the flag in an implicit enhancement spot in your function modules used for IDoc processing.</li>
<li>Evaluate in your existing coding the transaction code SY-TCODE; most likely you should see a clear difference between your IDoc processing and the other updates where you want to trigger the IDoc.</li>
<li>Most likely the IDoc processing triggers function module MATERIAL_MAINTAIN_DARK (e.g. MATERIAL_INPUT_MATMAS01 does); this function module uses a global variable FLAG_BAPI_CALL to indicate the non-dialog processing. So if you feel adventurous you could evaluate this flag in your coding.</li>
</ul>
Change pointer won't really do you any good if your functionality is already working without them apart from the trigger. Even if you write change pointers, you still have to implement the trigger functionality, so essentially back to square one...
In general another good option is often to use workflow events that are already triggered. I.e. in your case business object BUS1001006 almost does the trick. It has events for <em>ViewCreated</em> and <em>Created</em>, but unfortunately lacks events for material updates (and I didn't see any other appropriate object that has it and a quick trace while updating a material didn't fire any appropriate event).
Cheers, harald

Suppress Non Changed Fields in change pointer triggered IDOC

I have a requirement to clone message type MATMAS as ZMATMAS. This ZMATMAS is the message type I used to create change pointer triggering outbound idoc for change/create of materials.
When i change a material, all fields are sent instead of the fields only changed(of course key fields should be sent as well). Is there a way via configuration that I can suppress fields which are not changed? Or do i need to clone FM MASTERIDOC_CREATE_SMD_MATMAS and suppress the fields via program
Thanks in Advance!

i'll clarify the requirement again.
Let say i changed a field BRGEW in the material master.
Currently, all the segements which contains BRGEW is sent, but these segements contains other data which are not changed in the material master.
How do i suppress it?
Thanks,

How to suppress messages in when-validate-item triggers

Hi,
I'm trying to handle the duplicate records in when-validate-item trigger in block level by using Kevin D Clarke's logic
Form program unit:
function COMPARISON (in1 number, in2 number) is
if in1 = in2 then
return(1);
else
return(0);
end if;
end;
3 new hidden fields:
CONTROL.PK_COPY
DATABLOCK.MATCH_FOUND
calculation mode: formula
formula: COMPARISON(:control.PK_COPY, :datablock.PK)
CONTROL.NUMBER_OF_MATCHES
calculation_mode: summary
summary_function: Sum
summarised_block: DATABLOCK
summarised_item: MATCH_FOUND
WHEN_VALIDATE_ITEM on DATABLOCK.PK
:control.pk_copy := :datablock.pk;
if :control.number_of_matches > 1 then
message('matching key found');
end if;
(DATABLOCK must have query_all_records = TRUE) But its showing popup message three times , i want to show it only once.
Can anybody suggest me how to handle this.
Thanks,
Ramana.

I hope you put a Raise Form_trigger_failure following your message!
If you have included the form_trigger_failure, then your WVI trigger may be executing multiple times due to some other process trying to navigate away from the item or record. Could that be the case?

Suppress an error message while creating a return PO ( ZRO type) (ME21n)

Hello All,
I have to write a code in order to suppress the below message while creating a return purchase order (of type ZRO) , transaction ME21n after entering the purchase organization, purchase group, the vendor & the material no :-
"You have no authorization to create without reference to another document".
For users with the below values of parameter ID & parameter value :-
parameter ID = EFB & parameter value = 02 in transaction 'SU3' , under "parameters" tab, this message is getting triggered.
My requirement is to suppress this message.
Please suggest an exit name or a BADI name wherein I can implement the code for this requirement.
Regards,
Rachana.

You can remove parameter ID EFB
and for Order type other then ZRO you can put check of doc. reference.

How to suppress the Acknowledgement Error in IDOC to File scenario?

Hi -
I got the status in SXMB_MONI as 'Processed Successfully' for the IDOC to File scenario but the Acknoledgement status throws an error saying 'Acknowledgement not possible'.
I read one of the documents in the forums on how to suppress the acknowledgement using a table on R/3 side using IDXNOALE,
i tried that option but i still get the 'Acknowledgement not possible' error.
Is there any other way to suppress this error?
Thanks,
Tirumal

Hi Tirumal,
Receiver adapters that run on the Adapter Engine support system acknowledgments if they are requested by the sender. Acknowledgements are triggered when a message is successfully processed by the adapter or if an error occurs while it is being processed. Receiver adapters do not support application acknowledgments. The RNIF and CIDX adapters are exceptions to this rule, since they also support scenario-dependent application acknowledgments. Sender adapters of the Adapter Engine do not request any acknowledgments.
This means, JDBC adapter does only send system acks, however IDoc adapter is requesting application acks. Therefore as mentioned by the previous poster, you have to disable acks for this scenario using report IDX_NOALE.
Also go through these documents for any further help:
http://sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/library/xi/xi-how-to-guides/how to handle acknowledgments for idoc.pdf
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/6a/e6194119d8f323e10000000a155106/content.htm
Regards,
abhy

PAI is not triggered after I choose value in F4

Hello experts,
I fight with the following problem:
On my screen I use input field (ucf_s_coi_afd03_ct-xrproc_param) and I coded the F4 help for it manually
PROCESS ON VALUE-REQUEST.
FIELD ucf_s_coi_afd03_ct-xrproc_param
MODULE req_xrproc_param_2006.
After I press f4 on this field, the values are correctly listed but after I choose one value (double click), I would expect that the PAI is triggered but it is not. I have to press ENTER, only then.
Is there a way how to trigger the PAI after the value is chosen?
I found one way, but I don't want to use it:
If I change the input field into "List box" or "List box with key", then I can assign function code to it and if I do that, then it works - PAI is triggered after value is chosen. However, I don't want to use list box, I need standard input field.
Any ideas?
Regards,
Tomas

>
Jonathan Coleman wrote:
> Rather than triggering the PBO in order to fill in other fields on the screen from your POV event, the usual approach I've seen is to call the function DYNP_VALUES_UPDATE (which is quite well documented) e.g. you could get a customer number from your F4 dropdown, then retrieve their name and address and populate that data back into the screen all from within the "process on value-request" module logic.
>
> Jonathan
The original problem (or at least my orignal problem) which was solved by the SUPPRESS DIALOG was how to trigger my PAI validation - not the PBO though that of course follows on afterwards - immediately on selecting a value from a search help in order to carry out a further check on the value selected. I've used DYNP_VALUES_UPDATE in other situations, but it was not a suitable solution for me here.

Suppress PO output in case a PO is updated by a purchase order response

Experts,
we are in SRM 5.0. We are trying to suppress any PO output when a PO is updated by purchase order response. We are experimenting with PO output start conditions (Customizing). No succes until now. We tried to check whether the object status table has status 'Variance in PO response' (I1352). No effect.
Does anybody have a clue or even better, an example, how to achieve this without the use of BADI's or defining any customer fields?
Apparantly when a purchase order is updated via the purchase order response the BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI is not triggered, or at least we were not able to debug it, so it looks like this is no option either.
Any suggestions?
Thanks for your help, Maurice de Feijter

Hello Jay, thanks for your suggestion. We are currently implementing SP 14 to 17 in which the note you mentioned is included. Unfortunately PO output is still not suppressed automatically when a PO response is accepted and copied to the PO, even if no content is changed (price, quantity, delivery date ....) .
That is the reason why we were looking for the possibility to use start conditions in customizing. The main problem there it that we do not know how to recognize that a PO change is triggered by the PO response, and how to configure that in a condition. SAP docu does not give any clue.
So, any other suggestion is welcome

Alert in BPM not triggered anymore

Hello,
I have a strange behavior in my integration process. I defined an alert category in ALRTCATDEF and in my BPM I trigger an alert using that defined category.
This worked fine so far, but after making some non alert-related changes in the process and reactivating it, no more alerts are visible using report RSALERTDISP. Even when rolling back the history to a process version that already worked no more alerts are received.
Checking the workflow log I can see that the alert step is executed successfully "Triggers a process alert in the background" : --> Step completed.
What I have seen however is that in the list with technical details the ALERT_ID in the container is 00000. In earlier tests there was always a value assigned.
Could this be a reason or are there any limitations on the max. number of alerts that can be sent?
Any help is highly appreciated.

This worked fine so far, but after making some non alert-related changes in the process and reactivating it, no more alerts
are visible using report RSALERTDISP. Even when rolling back the history to a process version that already worked no more
alerts are received.
Did you checked the return code of your IP in SXI_CACHE after activating the changes?
Also do a check on the BPM in IR....F7...and see if there are any warning messages.
There is no limit on the number of alerts that can be raised....just that you should have unchecked Suppress Multiple Alerts option in RWB and Alert Rule should be active
Regards,
Abhishek.

Alerts not getting triggered for invalid receiver receiver

Hello,
My scenario is IDoc to HTTP.I have defined alert rules for my scenario.
I have condition mentioned in receiver determination.Depending on vendor number data is sent to corresponding receiver.
But when i send IDoc is sent with invalid vendor number,it is failing in XI system with error as :No receiver could be determined but not alert is being thrown or triggered.
Same situation is working in Dev and quality but not in production.
I ahve checked the alert rules thorughly in all the 3 environments and they are all perfe

does the error"RCVR_DETERMINATION.NO_RECEIVER_CASE_ASYNC" gets triggered only when reciever service is not
mentioned in alert rule condition?
This error gets triggered when no receiver matching with the mentioned Condition is found.....the Condition in Receiver Determination OR if no receiver service exists.
I hope you have created a rule in Alert Rule section of RWB and have unchecked the Suppress Multiple Alerts options.
When you get the above error in SXMB_MONI you should get an alert
Regards,
Abhishek.

How to suppress duplicates

Hi,
how can I suppress in Forms duplicates! I mean if I have in my Table two same job's then it should be suppress.
In SQL can we do it with DISTINCT! How in Forms?

You can set WHERE Clause
where ROWID in (select MIN(ROWID) from MY_TABLE
group by COLUMN1, COLUMN2,... COLUMN_LAST)
Forms works slowly then view but you can update (delete) data using PRE-UPDATE (-DELETE) triggers.

How do I suppress scrolling of a ScrollPane via MouseWheel ?

Hi all!
I'm trying to suppress the scrolling via MouseWheel if the user has pressed the control key at time of scrolling, but I'm not able to do it. It doesn't matter at which node I add the ScrollEvent handler. The problem is, the ScrollEvent handler gets only called if the scrollbar reaches the end or the start of the scrollbar, only then the event is triggered.
I tried to disable the scrolling alltogether. I have set the method setOnScrolling(null) of the ScrollPane and afterwards I tried to replaced it with my own handler, but it didn't work.
I use the JavaFX 2.0.2 SDK. It seems like there was a bug report that could be related to this [RT-17890|http://javafx-jira.kenai.com/browse/RT-17890]. If I use the deprecated MouseEvent.IMPL_MOUSE_WHEEL_ROTATED the handler gets called, but still I'm not able to suppress the scrolling if the control or any key is pressed.
Did anybody observe the same behavior of the ScrollPane and ScrollEvent ?
EDIT: Hmm. it seems like I have to add an EventFilter instead to an simple EventHandler.
Edited by: user965407 on 26.01.2012 13:52

it seems like I have to add an EventFilter instead to an simple EventHandler.Yes, that is right, catch the ScrollEvent in an EventFilter installed on the ScrollPane and consume the event if scrollEvent.isScrollDown() returns true.
To better understand event handling see: http://docs.oracle.com/javafx/2.0/events/jfxpub-events.htm and Re: Understanding Mouse Event Bubbling

Suppress a message

Hello,
I use the triggers "ON MESSAGE" and "ON ERROR" and write null in the triggers to suppress the messages. So it works fine. But if I change for example make a an alter table I get the Message if I want to save the changes! How can I suppress this Message, too!
thanks

I'm not sure what you mean by null trigger, but here is a message handler I created that has proven effective for all my needs so far.
At the form level...
create trigger for 'ON-ERROR'
PR_HANDLE_MESSAGE( 'ERROR' );
create trigger for 'ON_MESSAGE'
PR_HANDLE_MESSAGE( 'MESSAGE' );
In the Program Units...
.PROCEDURE PR_HANDLE_MESSAGE (MSG_TYPE VARCHAR2) IS
. ALERT_BTN NUMBER;
. errtype VARCHAR2(3) := MESSAGE_TYPE;
. errcod NUMBER := MESSAGE_CODE;
. errtxt VARCHAR2(80) := MESSAGE_TEXT;
.BEGIN
.--* Generic system and error messages handler.
. IF errcod IN ( 40100, 40102, 41000, 40200, 41051 ) THEN
. -- Suppress these user messages
. ----------------------------------------------------------- -- ErrNo Message text
. -- 40100 At first record.
. -- 40102 Record must be entered or deleted first
. -- 40200 Field is protected against update
. -- 40212 Invalid value for field xxxx.
. -- 40350 Query caused no records to be retreived
. -- 40400 Transaction complete. N records saved.
. -- 40401 No changes to save
. -- 41000 This function not currently available
. -- 41026 Field does not understand operation
. -- 41045 Cannot find item: invalid ID.
. -- 41051 You can't create records here
. NULL;
. ELSIF errcod IN (-1) THEN
. -- Show these on status line
. -- ErrNo Message text
. MESSAGE(errtype||'-'||to_char(errcod)||': '||errtxt);
. ELSE
. IF MSG_TYPE = 'ERROR' THEN
. MESSAGE( errtype||'-'||to_char(errcod)||': '||errtxt );
. RAISE FORM_TRIGGER_FAILURE;
. ELSE
. MESSAGE( errtype||'-'||to_char(errcod)||': '||errtxt);
. END IF;
. END IF;
.END;

Suppress requested acknowledgement / AckNotSupported

Hi,
We have a Rosettanet flow over the RNIF1.1 adapter. By default , this adapter will add the 'SystemErrAck' and 'ApplicationErrAck' during the conversion of the message into XI format.
This message is send to an RFC receiver ( that doesn't support ApplicationErrAck ).
The result is that a message 'AckNotSupported' is triggered for each flow. This return flow goes in error in the RNIF adapter because the adapter doesn't know what to do with it ( and anyway I don't want to send a message to my partner informing him of a limitation in my system )
How can we suppress this ( unwanted ) behaviour ?
-Can we change the sender ack settings during message mapping ?
-Is there a generic adapter module that can do this ?
( which I could add in the RFC receiver channel )
-Should I change to receiver proxy ?
Other suggestions ?
rgds
Dirk
PS This is a high volume interface so I want to avoid BPM
Message was edited by:
Dirk Deberlanger

Hi all,
For anyone who is facing the same issue : I changed from RFC receiver to proxy receiver interface (that supports system ack /application ack). I moved the ABAP processing logic from the RFC (BAPI) receiver to the proxy receiver.
This 'resolved' the internal 'AckNotSupported' message. The only 'side-effect' we still see in the SXMB_MONI is that the message flows keep a green question mark in the ack status 'Awaiting Ack' field. But this does not seem to have any negative side effect sofar.
Dirk

Suppress triggers

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for