Supress EULA

I am having a problem I used the customization wizard to supress the EULA during my install of Adobe X Standard. I am doing the install silent with SCCM as part of building my reference image. After the install we us SCUP to fully patch the install. Everything seems to work in the install but when I log into the machine and launch Adobe X it displays the EULA for each user that launches it. Any one experinced this or have any tips.

Questions regarding the customizer and SCUP should be posted to this forum:
http://forums.adobe.com/community/acrobat/acrobat_enterprise_install

Similar Messages

Creative suite 4 "unattended" install

Im trying to deploy cs4 silently, but with a progress bar so users can see when it is finished installing (unattended). I know you could do that in cs3, but apparently from what ive found they dont do that anymore in cs4.
Unless they have another mode to specify in the command line
(--mode=silent). are there any other modes to display progress, but supress EULA, and preserialise, without making it 100% silent?
thanks
Logan

Hi Logan,
It's been like this since version 2. So don't count on any different behaviour...
Greetz,
Joost

Cs4_deployment.pdf broken link

Hi Guys,
I have contacted Adobe several times through online, trying to access the cs4_deployment.pdf file that they link to in several of their knowledgebase articles.
They have not fixed the broken link and has been like that for over 3 weeks.
However, Im trying to deploy cs4 silently, but with a progress bar so users can see when it is finished installing. I know you could do that in cs3, but apparently from what ive found they dont do that anymore.
Unless they have another mode to specify in the command line
(--mode=silent). are there any other modes to display progress, but supress EULA, and preserialise, without making it 100% silent?

I believe the correct link should be http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/openoptions/pdfs/manualenterprisedeployment_cs4_help.pdf.
We are in the process of correcting the links in the knowledge base articles. Thank you for binging this to our attention.

Silent Installations using MDT2013..

Hi,
I'm currently running MDT2013 and trying to silently install 3rd Party Applications. (Such as Adobe Reader 11.0.10, Quicktime 7.7.6)
This is the following command that i'm trying to use to install Adobe silently.
"AdbeRdr11010_en_US.exe /sAll /rs /I /msi"/qb-! /norestart ALLUSERS=1 EULA_ACCEPT=YES SUPPRESS_APP_LAUNCH=YES""
Unfortunately this doesn't seem to work for me and everywhere i've looked seems to give me the same string of commands to try.
If someone could advise me on where it is I’m going wrong, that'd be lovely.
Craig.

Downloaded the "Adobe Customization Wizard XI", then open it, make some pretty basic settings changes (like: Supress EULA, reboot, create shortcuts etc).. then save the TRANSFORM file, move it into the same directory as the software folder (C:\Deployment
Share\Applications\Adobe....). Then apply the command to match your file name (keep it simple) and then added the Quiet Install Command line;
msiexec /i AcroRead.msi TRANSFORMS="AcroRead.mst" /q and that's it
mohd.w

Supress Vendor name in std report S_ALR_87012103 - Vendors: Items

Hi ,
I am using report 'S_ALR_87012103 - Vendors: Items -> List of Vendor Line Items' to list the vendor open items and in the output the vendor name with address is displayed, I want to supress name and address so that when I download to excel it will easier for me to change the columns.
Than

Try using FBL1N instead of this report, which does not show address.
Regards,
SDNer

Overall limit field is to be display or supressed in case of service PO

dear sir,
i making service purchase order using the service master record number .In item details limit tab is there , in this overall limit is there , i want to supressed or display this field.Whether it is possible, if yes where i can do setting so that in case of particular purchase order document type , with service no entered and in limit tab , overall limit is only in displayed form or either gets supressed.
thanks & regards
shailendra

dear sir ,
i am working in SAP 4.7 version , according to your reply i follow the path describe in mail
spro-mm- external servicesmanagement - define scree layout following sccreen come
Field sel. key ME21 Description Create purchase order Cat. of field sel. 2
Fld.sel.1 ......................................................................
Fld.sel.2 ......................................................................

Photoshop elements won't run, eula agreement error

This week one of our users began experiencing a problem with using Photoshop Elements 5.0. She knows the application worked fine on her computer a few weeks ago, but when she tried to use the program today she is being asked to accept or decline the user agreement. Once she clicks "Accept" the program then gives her the error message below:
"Your Adobe Photoshop Elements EULA agreement has been declined or is invalid. The application cannot continue and must now exit."
She clicks "OK" and the program exits. What has happened? Do we need to re-install? We work in an environment where we have no administrative rights on these machines and so we are trying to avoid getting the IT folks to re-install since they could take a couple weeks. Please help us figure out this problem.
Thanks!!

This is a recuring issue for me, most likely caused by a registry cleaner. I can go months - as many as six without that lovely greeting. I have found no other way to correct it other than a reinstallation.

How can I supress a Windows dialog box programmatically in LabView?

I am trying to automatically supress or close a windows dialog box that appears when a LabView program crashes. I have a restart program that will automatically reopen the program and I don't want to have to click on the program error window that results from the crash. Does anyone know how to do this?
Thanks so much for your time!

The program rarely crashes - it is running in the background for the entire day and we just want to ensure that it is monitored and restarted in case of a crash. We also don't want the user to be bothered with the program error messagebox that pops up saying that an error log is being created. The program crashes when too many programs are running at the same time - so the problem isn't a huge one. I was just wondering if it was possible to stop this program error message from appearing by programmatically selecting the okay button or by suppressing the message entirely?

Supress default logon box after invalid logon via SSO

Hi,
We are using SSO to authenticate to the database. If the SSO authenication fails, Oracle Forms automatically brings up the default logon box. For example -
A user registers and their userid and password are stored in the OID. The user's password is then reset by a DBA. The next time the user tries to access the application, the credentials stored in the OID are incorrect. The on-error trigger in the form fires and brings up an error message. Then the default logon box pops up. I would like to just display a message and then exit the form. I do not want the user to have the option to enter a userid and password. I have tried putting an exit_form in the on-error trigger, but it says that exit_form is a restricted procedure. No other triggers fire before the default logon box pops up.
Does anyone know how I can supress the default logon box?
Thanks,
Kim

Hi Caíque,
Yes, we allowed pop-ups and cokies in the browser and disabled the firewall.
When we click a button on the CRM UI in internet explorer, the error message is
-Invalid argument
"http://acsmrcrm03.com:8000/sap(====)/bc/bsp/sap/bsp_wd_base/popup_buffered_frame_cached.htm?sap-client=100&sap-language=EN&sap-domainRelax=min"
-Object does not support this property or method"

Discoverer EUL to OLAP

Im new to using Discoverer technologies, I would like to ask if it is possible to convert an EUL (End User Layer) to OLAP (Online Analytic Processing) Anaytic Workspace. I would like to create a customized web applications using BI Beans. I already have my Discoverer Business Areas. Can I use these business areas into my BI beans application. I've read that the Discoverer Viewer is made from BI Beans... So Im wondering if it is possible...

Hi
Sorry this is not possible. There is no relatioship between an EUL and an analytic workspace. You'll have to do this manually I'm afraid.
Best wishes
Michael

Discoverer Viewer/Plus does not work with Custom EUL owned by APPS user

I am facing a unique issue with one of my customers. They have a custom EUL named XX_EUL_US and this does not allow connecting through discoverer viewer or discoverer plus.
I have worked with custom EULS before at other customers and this was never the case. I am being told that this issue is happening as the EUL owner is APPS instead of some other user. Is this the case? Can discoverer viewer not be used with EULs owned by apps user?
Please not that the Default EUL in ICX profiles is set to this EUL and no other EUL profiles are set.
Appreciate any thoughts on this.

Hi,
I am not sure what you mean when you say you have a "custom EUL named XX_EUL_US". The EUL table should be created in a schema named XX_EUL_US. This will then be the EUL owner. You will then need to connect to Discoverer Administrator as the EUL owner and grant privileges to Apps users and/or responsibilities.
The user should then be able to connect to Discoverer Plus/View using their apps username, responsibility and password.
To be able to connect directly from an apps menu you need to have the ICX parameters set correctly. The ICX: Discoverer Default End User Layer Schema Prefix should be set to XX_EUL (without the _US). The ICX: Discoverer End User Layer Language Override should be set to US or not set at all.
Rod West

Discoverer PLUS EUL not accessible

Hi guys & girls,
This is my issue:
With Discoverer Admin I've created an EUL and a Business Area and I granted the right privilges to a user XXX. When I launch Discoverer Desktop, I connect as user XXX and I can see that I have access to that Business Area. When I launch Discoverer Plus, I create a connection but I do not see the EUL that I've created, so I can not choose it for the connection.
Anyone an idea?
Christophe

I found the problem...
On my laptop, I have a Discoverer Admin. 10g installation, connected upon a 9i db and created my EUL. Created a Business Area and gave the correct privs/security to my user xxx. When a started Disco Plus and created a private connection, I did not see my EUL appearing in the list of values. Solution: I used a discoverer Admin 9i version, connected upon the 9i db, created the EUL, created a Business Area and gave the correct privs/security to user xxx. Then I reconnected via my Discoverer Admin 10g to that EUL, did the upgrade (forced to do it) and then everything worked out fine. So the trouble is/was, that I was working with two different versions of Discoverer..
Thanx anyway Rod

Discoverer with OWB generated EULs

i configure my warehouse star schema using OWB (warehouse builder 9i release 2) and generated the EUL. the were some warnings but they were pointing to some invalid characters in the names of the objects but the import succeeded.
i could see all the imported definition from OWB using Discoverer Admin (also iDS Release 2 - EUL version 5).
sample of my star schema:-
fact table
salesman_id
product_id
sales_amt
dimension
salesman (which also contains salesman name attribute)
product (which also contains product description attribute)
so, i can see the Discoverer joins from the fact to the dimension tables.
when i create a workbook (report) using Discoverer Desktop, i faced the following problems:-
if i just have Salesman (ID or Description) as a row, everything is fine.
if i add in the Product ID, it still works as per normal.
but when i add Product Description into the report, i experienced a weird behaviour. somehow, the Salesman ID field will be automatically filtered to show only a certain number of records in the result (less than what it initially was) !
usually if you put field in the Page Items section you will have to select to view <All> records, right ? citing the scenario i just mentioned above, i will only see some record values ... i won't see the <All> displayed for me to choose.
has this got to do with the foreign key relationship from the Fact table's Product ID field to the Product Dimension table ? it worked for the Salesman dimension !!
the only thing different about the product dimension is the product id field is VARCHAR2 length 18. you could have numeric values like 000000000012345678 (numbers are padded with zeros to make up 18 chars) and alphanumeric values like MAT_TG12345 (which are not padded with anything - left-justified). i could set that the report would only retrieve the records which has product id matching the numeric values !
any ideas ?
thanks to anyone who is kind enough to read this lengthy post and reply it :)

It would appear that you do not have integrity between the fact and the product dimension.
Does the foriegn key exisit in the database (deployed) or is it only in the OWB repository (not deployed).
Two thing:-
Try changin the join to an outer join.
Take the sql from the View SQL drop down option and run in another SQL Editor.
Neil

Best choice for exporting / importing EUL

Hi all
I have been tasked with migrating an EUL from a R11 to a R12 environment. The Discoverer version on both environments is 10.1.2 and the OS is Solaris on oracle db's.
I am unfortunately not experienced with Discoverer and there seems to be no one available to assist for various reasons. So I have been reading the manual and forum posts and viewing metalink articles.
I tried exporting the entire eul via the wizard and then importing it to the new environment but i was not successfull and experienced the system hanging for many hours with a white screen and the log file just ended.
I assumed this was a memory problem or slow network issues causing this delay. Someone suggested I export import the EUL in pieces and this seemed to be effective but I got missing item warnings when trying to open reports. This piece meal approach also worried me regarding consistency.
So I decided to try do the full import on the server to try negate the first problem I experienced. Due to the clients security policies I am not able to open the source eul and send it to our dev. I was able to get it from their dev 11 system but I dismissed this as the dev reports were not working and the only reliable eul is the Prod one. I managed to get a prod eex file from a client resource but the upload to my server was extremely slow.
I asked the dba to assit with the third option of exporting a db dump of the eul_us and importing this into my r12 dev environment. I managed this but had to export the db file using sys which alleviated a priviledge problem when logging in, I have reports that run and my user can see the reports but there are reports that were not shared to sysadmin in the source enviroment are now prefixed with the version 11 user_id in my desktop and the user cannot see her reports only the sysadmin ones.
I refreshed the BA's using a shell script I made up which uses the java cmd with parameters.
After some re reading I tried selecting all the options in the validate menu and refreshing in the discover admin tool.
If I validate and refresh the BA using the admin tool I get the hanging screen and a lot of warnings that items are missing( so much for my java cmd refresh!) and now the report will not open and I see the substitute missing item dialogue boxes.
My question to the forum is which would be the best approach to migrate the entire eul from a R11 instance to a R12 instance in these circumstances?
Many thanks
Regards
Nick

Hi Srini
The os and db details are as follows:
Source:
eBus 11.5.2
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
SunOS 5.10 Generic_142900-11 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V890
Target:
ebus 12.1.2
Oracle Database 11g Enterprise Edition Release 11.1.0.7.0 - 64bit Production DEV12
SunOS 5.10 Generic_142900-11 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V890
Yes the DBA initially did an exp for me using EUL_US as the owner but a strange thing happened with privileges and also, some of the imported tables appeared in the target environment under the apps schema(21 tables) even though the eul_us exp had been 48 tables.
I also had a problem on the db with "eul_us has insufficient privileges on table space discoverer" type errors.
I checked the eul_us db privileges and was unable to resolve this initial privilege error even though the privileges were granted to eul_us.
The dba managed to exp as system and then import it with the full=y flag in the import command which seems to bring in the privileges.
Then I ran the eul5_id.sql and then made up a list of the business areas and made a sh script to refresh the business areas as follows:
java -jar eulbuilder.jar -connect sysadmin/oracle1@dev -apps_user -apps_responsibility "System Administrator" -refresh_business_area "ABM Activities" -log refresh.log
This runs successfully and I can log in select business area and grant access to the users. The reports return data.
Then one of the users said she can't see all her reports. I noticed some if I opened desktop that were sitting there prefixed with a hash and her version 11 user id.
So back to the manuals and in the disco admin help the instructions are to first go to view > validate > select all options then go to the business area and click file refresh. This gives me a lot of warnings about items that are missing. I assume this is because the item identifiers brought across in the db dump are the version 11 ones and thus not found in the new system.
Any suggestions?
Many thanks
Nick

How to supress a warning message in BDC for ME11 Tcode

Hi Expert,
I am doing a BDC report for ME11 Tcode and some of warning is ignorable for this transaction code,how can we suppress these warning through BDC program, is it possible or will have to make some changes changes in TCODE(ME11) itself.

hi,
if the warning message coming in a pop-up window then it can be supressed in the following way.
1. comment the lines of the code of bdc recording of that pop-up screen along with the perform of bdc ok code '=ENTE".
2. use the structure ctu_params and fill the correspondings fiels, particularly the field nobinpt = 'X' and then use this structure in the call transcation statement as
call transcation 'ME11'
using bdcdata
options from opt ( structure of ctu_params )
3. At the time of recording use the option of check box " no batch input session ".
regards,
Alok

Supress EULA

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for