[svn:cairngorm3:] 17658: Maven: Spelling error in version name

Revision: 17658
Revision: 17658
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2010-09-10 09:58:09 -0700 (Fri, 10 Sep 2010)
Log Message:
Maven: Spelling error in version name
Modified Paths:
    cairngorm3/trunk/libraries/Task/pom.xml

So does anyone know why I m getting the following error when the definition of "GeneralFault" is in the .wsdl file? According to the error messge, it sounds like I have to define it in a .xsd file.
Error ORABPEL-10902: compilation failed
Description: in "bpel.xml", XML parsing failed because "undefined part element.
In WSDL at "file:/D:/projects/MyBPEL/bpel/MySvc-v1.wsdl", message part element "{http://www.company.com/wsdl/MySvc-v1.0}GeneralFault" is not defined in any of the schemas.
Please make sure the spelling of the element QName is correct and the WSDL import is complete
AJ

Similar Messages

[svn:cairngorm3:] 17674: Maven: Remove deprecated PopUpFactory from Flex SDK 4 version.

Revision: 17674
Revision: 17674
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2010-09-13 02:20:26 -0700 (Mon, 13 Sep 2010)
Log Message:
Maven: Remove deprecated PopUpFactory from Flex SDK 4 version. Use PopUpWrapper.reuse = false instead.
Modified Paths:
    cairngorm3/trunk/libraries/Popup/pom.xml

Hi, those technologies are so cool but I failed to run the sample:
- I am using Maven 3.0.2.
Runnung mvn build from the latest source code from trunk "....cairngorm3\samples\todo>mvn install". I got the error relating to "unable to transacoding"
D:\Java\workspaces\misc\cairngorm3\samples\todo\todo_flex\todo_flex_shell\src\ma
in\flex\com\adobe\txi\todo\shell\skins\ApplicationHeaderSkin.mxml: Error: unable
to resolve '/assets/todoLogo_big.png' for transcoding
D:\Java\workspaces\misc\cairngorm3\samples\todo\todo_flex\todo_flex_shell\src\ma
in\flex\com\adobe\txi\todo\shell\skins\ApplicationHeaderSkin.mxml: Error: Unable
to transcode /assets/todoLogo_big.png.
I shift the assets folder to src/main/flex. It got compiled then I can deploy succesfully into Tomcat 6. But I still get empty screen.
Do I have to do something else like "run db script", "create DB schema" ?
Note: my adt.jar is from flex_sdk_4.5.0.17855
Thanks

[svn:cairngorm3:] 16855: Maven: Module Flex 3 compilation.

Revision: 16855
Revision: 16855
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2010-07-10 05:18:47 -0700 (Sat, 10 Jul 2010)
Log Message:
Maven: Module Flex 3 compilation.
Modified Paths:
    cairngorm3/trunk/build-parent/pom.xml
    cairngorm3/trunk/libraries/Module/src/com/adobe/cairngorm/module/ViewLoader.as
    cairngorm3/trunk/libraries/lib-parent/pom.xml

Thanks for this update.
Do you plan to put on this repository only parsley/swiz/... dependencies that Cairngorm libs support or the latest dependencies versions? I was wondering that because I saw you didn't add Parsley 2.3.2

[svn:cairngorm3:] 15277: -Maven: Add ModuleId to metadata section.

Revision: 15277
Revision: 15277
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2010-04-08 06:46:15 -0700 (Thu, 08 Apr 2010)
Log Message:
-Maven: Add ModuleId to metadata section.
-Navigation: Parsley migration: ScopeManager retrieval via Context.
-Navigation: Integrate with latest module library.
Modified Paths:
    cairngorm3/trunk/libraries/Module/pom.xml
    cairngorm3/trunk/libraries/ModuleTest/.actionScriptProperties
    cairngorm3/trunk/libraries/ModuleTest/.flexProperties
    cairngorm3/trunk/libraries/Navigation/src/com/adobe/cairngorm/navigation/NavigationEvent. as
    cairngorm3/trunk/libraries/Navigation/src/com/adobe/cairngorm/navigation/landmark/Abstrac tNavigationDecorator.as
    cairngorm3/trunk/libraries/Navigation/src/com/adobe/cairngorm/navigation/waypoint/decorat or/WaypointDecorator.as
    cairngorm3/trunk/libraries/NavigationTest/src/NavigatorSample1.mxml
    cairngorm3/trunk/libraries/NavigationTest/src/sample1/Sample1Context.mxml
    cairngorm3/trunk/libraries/NavigationTest/src/sample1/application/MessageDestination.as
    cairngorm3/trunk/libraries/NavigationTest/src/sample1/contacts/ContactsModule.mxml
    cairngorm3/trunk/libraries/NavigationTest/src/sample1/presentation/ContentViewStack.mxml
Added Paths:
    cairngorm3/trunk/libraries/NavigationTest/src/sample1/api/
    cairngorm3/trunk/libraries/NavigationTest/src/sample1/api/NewContactEvent.as

Have you tried adding the following css selector to your css file.
.nav-bar a {
    text-align: center;
or insert it in the <style> tag you have on the page:
<style type="text/css">
body {
    margin-left: 200px;
.n {
    text-align: center;
.nav-bar a {
    text-align: center;
</style>

[svn:cairngorm3:] 21199: Maven Tests failing for unkown reason:

Revision: 21199
Revision: 21199
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2011-05-04 01:08:33 -0700 (Wed, 04 May 2011)
Log Message:
Maven Tests failing for unkown reason:
https://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/CGM-60
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/CGM-60
Modified Paths:
    cairngorm3/trunk/libraries/NavigationParsley/pom.xml

Hi Suraj,
> Since its graphical the blocks will take space, but
> there is always an adavntage of processing time.
> Ebven though it may appear bigger, it will take less
> time as compared with Java code (for the same
> mapping).
Could you explain more why the graphical mapping has better performance? I thought the graphical mapping is compiled into a Java class in the runtime anyway.
> Yes thats there, but same goes with Java mapping too
> right (if you haven't mentioned it as constants)
I mainly think about inheritance. If I have to build 10 interfaces and they all have some common behavior, I can create a base interface class to encapsulate the common logic. But with graphical mapping, you have to duplicate them in each interface.
> Disadvantages of Java mapping:
> 1. Performance
Same as above. I just don't see why Java has worse performance. I actually think Java should have better performance. You can optimize the code anyway you want. In some cases, you have to use queue functions in graphical mapping but it's not necessary in Java.
> 2. All might not be well versed with Java Code(though
> everyone may know basic java) .
I am not asking everyone to abandon graphical mapping. I am just wondering which one is better when you have skills for both.
> 3. Lot of standard functions are available in GM
> which you can choose, but you have to remember the
> exact code for those in Java mapping.
You can create functions in Java too. All you have to do is to remember the function name.
Kenny

[svn] 3757: Correct spelling error in FxCheckBoxExample.mxml

Revision: 3757
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-10-20 14:42:34 -0700 (Mon, 20 Oct 2008)
Log Message:
Correct spelling error in FxCheckBoxExample.mxml
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/flex4/asdoc/en_US/mx/components/examples/FxCheckBoxExa mple.mxml

Region spelling error on iCloud Pages docs - on ML

I have my systems set up for British English. Just upgraded to Mountain Lion and latest versions of iWork for OSX and ios.
Documents created in pages on ipad synch ok to mac, but UK spelling is flagged as mispelt - changing this to US version results in spelling error flag being removed.
The document shows ok on the iPad in Pages and for example, typing color on the iPad is flagged as incorrect and colour as correct.
If I create a new doc in pages on the iPad then this problem appears again on the mac. It seems to have set the document flag as US rather than UK - during the icloud transfer from ipad to mac - thereafter, any new words typed in are checked as mispelt if UK spelling when typing on to the doc on the mac
If I create a new doc on the mac, then synch to the ipad via icloud is fine in both directions
The icloud synch works fine (as far as I can see) on keynote and numbers.
Any ideas?
Ian

Are both devices using the same iCloud account, is document and data syncing turned on on each.
Does other content sync OK, do you see your documents at iCloud.com.

Spelling error in error message

Hello,
I know this is not a very important issue, but anyway I try to report it.
In SQLDev version 3.1.07.42 (but the issue is present also in v1.5.5) there is a spelling error in the connection busy error message.
It says "*Connection is currrently busy. Try again?*", but I believe there are too many "r" in the word "currently".
Thanks,
Paolo

Such tags can have uses beyond getting fed back to the compiler. For instance, I do this at the top of my build tree:
make -k >& ,make-log
analyzelogfile ,make-log > ,build-summary
The analysis summarizes how many warnings and errors come from the compiler, how many other compiler errors were generated (collect2 phase), and how many linker errors were generated, by type of warning/error. This is tremendously helpful in quickly finding out whether the changes you just checked in made the situation better or worse.
For purposes of writing the analyzelogfile script, it helps a lot to have consistent structure/format of error and warning messages. Currently it's uglier than that, partly because there are multiple build phases involved (preprocessor, compiler, linker), each with its own ideas on how to print messages, and partly because I'm also maintaining portable code (Studio and GCC). I end up with a Perl script to do the analysis, and it can be hacked as new types of messages are discovered. It would be a lot nicer if the structure/format were well-defined in advance, and such tags were human-readable. Then the script would have an easier time finding and reporting the summarized data, by simply including such tags in the output along with a count of each type of tag that occurred.

I get Error: Platform version '5.0' is not compatiblewith min Version =6.0 max Version =6.0, I have uninstalled and reinstalled twice how do I fix this?

I have completed a factory system restore.
After doing a complete factory reinstall the FF updater is not installing the latest updates.
I get this error message:
Error: Platform version '5.0' is not compatible with minVersion>=6.0 maxVersion<=6.0.
I have completed these steps:
Make a Backup of your Firefox Profile folder in some other location
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox#Navigating_to_the_profile_folder
Completely Uninstall Firefox
https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Uninstalling%20Firefox
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Uninstalling_Firefox
SELECT TO REMOVE USER DATA AND SETTINGS
Download latest Firefox version from one of these links:
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/new/
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/central/
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/fx/
http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html
Installing Firefox
https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Installing%20Firefox%20on%20Windows
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Installing_Firefox
Manually Restore the Backed-up Firefox Profile
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_backup#Manually_restore_the_profile

The updater wasn't able to update all the files and some were left as older versions.
Do a clean reinstall.
If there are problems with updating then best is to download the full version and uninstall the currently installed version.
Download a fresh Firefox copy and save the file to the desktop.
* Firefox 6.0.x: http://www.mozilla.com/en-US/firefox/all.html
* Uninstall your current Firefox version.
* Do not remove personal data when you uninstall the current version.
Remove the Firefox program folder before installing that newly downloaded copy of the Firefox installer.
* It is important to delete the Firefox program folder to remove all the files and make sure that there are no problems with files that were leftover after uninstalling.
Your bookmarks and other profile data are stored elsewhere in the Firefox Profile Folder and won't be affected by a reinstall, but make sure that you do not select to remove personal data if you uninstall Firefox.
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_folder_-_Firefox
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Profile_backup

Firefox will not open after new update; Error: Platform version '1.9.2.13' is not compatible

After accepting the new update I got this error message when trying to restart Firefox:
XULRunner
Error: Platform version ‘1.9.2.13’ is not compatible with
minVersion >= 1.9.2.14
maxVersion <= 1.9.2.14
I have tried:
- Opening in Safe Mode; same error
- Uninstalling, deleting remaining info in C>ProgramFiles>MozillaFirefox folder, and reinstalling.
- Updating Avast antivirus in case that was interfering.
Now when I try to start Firefox I get this message;
Firefox is already running, but is not responding. To open a new window, you must first close the existing Firefox process, or restart your system.
But there is nothing happening in the Windows Task Manager. Please, somebody save me from Windows Internet Explorer!!

I experienced this error updating from Firefox 3.6.13 to 3.6.14 and resolved it by doing a 'clean' install' as described. It occurred again in updating from 3.6.14 to 3.6.15 and this time a clean install failed to rectify it. (Anyway, I don't want to have to go through this every time.)
Work-around: Shut down Firefox. Edit application.ini (typically "C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\application.ini")
[Gecko]
MinVersion=1.9.2.15
Change to 1.9.2.13
Save. Start Firefox. Dirty? Yes. Works? Yes.
(Gecko is the forerunner or XULrunner)

After update to 3.6.20, ERROR, platform version 1.9.2.18 not compatible with Min/Max v 1.9.2.20

Win2000 Pro SP4. Been running FireFox for several years. Ver3.6.6 since 03/22/2011. Got a msg window in FireFox stating important security update available. ''(ADDED INFO: Checked System Requirements of update and then...)'' As usual, I clicked yes load it. A few moments later I got the message: "XULRunner Error:
Platform version '1.9.2.18' is not compatible with
minVersion>=1.9.2.20
maxVersion<=1.9.2.20"
That is it, NO MORE FIREFOX!!! How can I fix it and not loose any of my 'stuff'?

You're welcome

I'm getting this error statement: XULRUNNER error: platform version 6.0.2 is not compatible with min etc max etc6.0.1 - what is this about and how can it be corrected?

This is what I think may have happened. The other day, Thursday Sept 8th, I shut down my pc in the middle of a Firefox upgrade. Now when I try to access Firefox on my pc, I get this error message:
XULRUNNER Error: Platform version '6.0.2 is not compatible with min Version >= 6.0.1 max Version < 6.0.1
What is this about and how can I retsore access to Firefox on my pc?

If you use ZoneAlarm Extreme Security then try to disable Virtualization.
Do a clean reinstall and delete the Firefox program folder.
* http://kb.mozillazine.org/Browser_will_not_start_up#XULRunner_error_after_an_update
*[[/questions/869812]]
*[[/questions/869951]]

After the most recent FF update, FF 3.6.6 will not load, citing the error message: "XULRunner / Error: Platform version '1.9.2.3' is not compatible with minVersion =1.9.2.6 / maxVersion". Tried updating XULRunner with no luck. Downloaded fresh copy and

After the most recent FF update, FF 3.6.6 will not load, citing the error message: "XULRunner / Error: Platform version '1.9.2.3' is not compatible with minVersion>=1.9.2.6 / maxVersion". Tried updating XULRunner with no luck. Downloaded fresh copy and installed. Still no luck.
== This happened ==
Every time Firefox opened
== FF updated to 3.6.6 ==
== User Agent ==
Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 5.1; Trident/4.0; GTB6.4; .NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.0.4506.2152; .NET CLR 3.5.30729)

Do a clean reinstall and download a fresh Firefox copy from http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/all.html and save the file to the desktop.
Uninstall your current Firefox version and remove the Firefox program folder before installing that copy of the Firefox installer.
It is important to delete the Firefox program folder to remove all the files and make sure that there are no problems with files that were leftover after uninstalling.
You can skip the step to create a new profile, that is not necessary for this issue.
See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Standard_diagnostic_-_Firefox#Clean_reinstall

I downloaded a Firefox notice and now I get Error:Platform version 1.9.2.3 is not compatible with MinVersion =1.9.2.4 MaxVersion

I downloaded a Firefox notice and now I get Error:Platform version 1.9.2.3 is not compatible with MinVersion>=1.9.2.4 MaxVersion

Do a clean reinstall and download a fresh Firefox copy from http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/all.html and save the file to the desktop.
Uninstall your current Firefox version and remove the Firefox program folder before installing that copy of the Firefox installer.
It is important to delete the Firefox program folder to remove all the files and make sure that there are no problems with files that were leftover after uninstalling.
You can skip the step to create a new profile, that is not necessary for this issue.
See http://kb.mozillazine.org/Standard_diagnostic_-_Firefox#Clean_reinstall

Won't restart after updating - it say's XULRunner Error: Platform version '1.9.2.3' is not compatible with Minversion = 1.9.2.11 Maxversion = 1.9.2.11

Updated from Firefox version 3.5.7 and it won't run. I get this error - it say's XULRunner Error: Platform version '1.9.2.3' is not compatible with Minversion>= 1.9.2.11 Maxversion>= 1.9.2.11

See my post here: [/questions/759671]

[svn:cairngorm3:] 17658: Maven: Spelling error in version name

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for