[svn:fx-trunk] 11933: Addressing an edge case for TileList where at times the listItems array doesn 't accurately reflect a fully realized set of item renderers.

Revision: 11933
Revision: 11933
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-11-18 06:55:18 -0800 (Wed, 18 Nov 2009)
Log Message:
Addressing an edge case for TileList where at times the listItems array doesn't accurately reflect a fully realized set of item renderers. This can occur when the TileList row/col creation routine bails out early when it believes it has no further need to create renderers due to current height of the list itself.
QE notes: None
Doc notes: None
Bugs: SDK-24169
Reviewer: Alex
Tests run: List, TileList, HorizontalList, DataGrid
Is noteworthy for integration: No
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-24169
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/controls/listClasses/ListBase.as

Due to a copy/paste glitch, some necessary spaces have inadvertently been removed. If I could fix this, I would.

Similar Messages

[svn:bz-trunk] 10595: Add ReadOnly test case for bug blz-427

Revision: 10595
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-09-25 11:44:20 -0700 (Fri, 25 Sep 2009)
Log Message:
Add ReadOnly test case for bug blz-427
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/blz-427
Modified Paths:
    blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/WEB-INF/flex/services-config.mods.xml
    blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/WEB-INF/src/blazeds/qa/remotingService/Book.java
    blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/WEB-INF/src/blazeds/qa/remotingService/Echo.java
Added Paths:
    blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/remotingService/dataTypes/ReadOn lyTest.mxml

[svn:fx-trunk] 10459: Change to ensure ScriptNodes are no longer part of the node tree after interface compilation stage in order to avoid the extra code that was necessary to avoid tripping over them during type checking , etc.

Revision: 10459
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-09-21 08:42:44 -0700 (Mon, 21 Sep 2009)
Log Message:
Change to ensure ScriptNodes are no longer part of the node tree after interface compilation stage in order to avoid the extra code that was necessary to avoid tripping over them during type checking, etc.
Improving revision 10199 a bit, to allow for single line comments.
QE notes: None
Doc notes: None
Bugs: SDK-22027
Reviewer: Paul
Tests run: Checking, Compiler cyclones
Is noteworthy for integration: No
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-22027
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/as3/AbstractSyntaxTreeUtil.java
    flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/mxml/InterfaceCompiler.java
    flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/mxml/builder/AbstractBuilder.java
    flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/mxml/builder/DocumentBuilder.java

In general theory, one now has the Edit button for their posts, until someone/anyone Replies to it. I've had Edit available for weeks, as opposed to the old forum's ~ 30 mins.
That, however, is in theory. I've posted, and immediately seen something that needed editing, only to find NO Replies, yet the Edit button is no longer available, only seconds later. Still, in that same thread, I'd have the Edit button from older posts, to which there had also been no Replies even after several days/weeks. Found one that had to be over a month old, and Edit was still there.
Do not know the why/how of this behavior. At first, I thought that maybe there WAS a Reply, that "ate" my Edit button, but had not Refreshed on my screen. Refresh still showed no Replies, just no Edit either. In those cases, I just Reply and mention the [Edit].
Also, it seems that the buttons get very scrambled at times, and Refresh does not always clear that up. I end up clicking where I "think" the right button should be and hope for the best. Seems that when the buttons do bunch up they can appear at random around the page, often three atop one another, and maybe one way the heck out in left-field.
While I'm on a role, it would be nice to be able to switch between Flattened and Threaded Views on the fly. Each has a use, and having to go to Options and then come back down to the thread is a very slow process. Jive is probably incapable of this, but I can dream.
Hunt

[svn] 2219: Add a negative constructor test case for RemoteObject destination.

Revision: 2219
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-06-24 14:20:55 -0700 (Tue, 24 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
Add a negative constructor test case for RemoteObject destination.
Modified Paths:
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/WEB-INF/flex/remoting-config.mods.xml
Added Paths:
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/WEB-INF/src/remoting/ConstructorNegativeTest.java
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/remotingService/ConstructorNegat iveTest.mxml

Revision: 2219
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-06-24 14:20:55 -0700 (Tue, 24 Jun 2008)
Log Message:
Add a negative constructor test case for RemoteObject destination.
Modified Paths:
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/WEB-INF/flex/remoting-config.mods.xml
Added Paths:
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/WEB-INF/src/remoting/ConstructorNegativeTest.java
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/mxunit/tests/remotingService/ConstructorNegat iveTest.mxml

[svn:bz-trunk] 20650: Some MBean tests needed flex.management. jmx stuff in the allow classes list for the class deserialization validator so adding it in on BlazeDS trunk .

Revision: 20650
Revision: 20650
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2011-03-07 12:20:03 -0800 (Mon, 07 Mar 2011)
Log Message:
Some MBean tests needed flex.management.jmx stuff in the allow classes list for the class deserialization validator so adding it in on BlazeDS trunk.
Modified Paths:
    blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/WEB-INF/flex/services-config.mods.validators.xml

Thank you very much!
I cant believe this little comment has been so helpful!
But yes it is:
I explain, despite my efforts to find, googled it, forums, faqs, etc...
no where it mentionned the manifest.fm file is... INSIDE the .jar!
Your comment "a zip" made me attempt to open it with winrar, and I found a manifest.fm file inside!
So far I was editing the one at the "source" of my project and rebuilding it with netbeans.
I am going to try that now.
Actually.... :( no its mentionning my main class!
Manifest-Version: 1.0
Ant-Version: Apache Ant 1.7.0
Created-By: 10.0-b19 (Sun Microsystems Inc.)
Main-class: courseworkjava3d.Simple3D
Class-Path:
X-COMMENT: Main-Class will be added automatically by buildWell I have no problems uploading you the .jar, it is for a coursework it is not a private project or whatever:
http://www.uploading.com/files/CM2LKWYU/BetaCourseworkJava3d_Final.jar.html
Oh and I felt on your comment "dont ask us" as if I was suppose to know... i'm a beginner, I did not know that! And I tried to give you so many infos so you dont lose your time if you want to help, especially as after my own research I found many, many results for this "main class" and I tried a few solutions!
Edited by: CupofTea on Apr 13, 2008 3:28 AM

Is there a case for iPad that will allow the leather cover to stay on for uk

I bought the iPad Retina display 16gb for a neighbour and added a leather cover for it. I had already bought her husband an iPad in November and bought the Smart case polyurethane. I mistakenly thought the leather cover was just the same as a case, but of course it's only the front that is protected.
Does anybody know of a good UK case/wallet type case that she can use with the cover attached, so that when's shes travellimng the whole unit is protected.
It must of course be thick enough to accommodate the iPad and leather front cover.
Can anyone help pleae?

Help. Same issue.

Best case for 3GS that wont scratch the phone (metal lining)

I've had the silicon cases before and they would always cause scratches on the metal part of the phone which was always annoying (most likely due to debris rubbing against it when the silicon case moved around). I was looking at the Incase Slider and it seemed that this would be a good case. Anyone have any issues with this case or can recommend a good case for it?

Just finished applying the Zagg Invisible Shield to my new iPhone 3GS and it's fantastic! Elegant and durable while retaining the sexy form factor of the phone itself.
It has been mentioned that it looks overwhelming to apply. I can't stress enough watching the videos on the site a few times to 'run through the motions.' It's imperative that you are in a dust free environment, work with a lint-free cloth, clean your hands really well and keep your fingertips and the adhesive film wet at all times.
What it lacks in speed of application, it more than makes up for in protection with no added bulk.
Just my two cents.

[svn:fx-trunk] 13322: Addressing my FIXMEs.

Revision: 13322
Revision: 13322
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2010-01-06 21:19:58 -0800 (Wed, 06 Jan 2010)
Log Message:
Addressing my FIXMEs. A couple were fixed, one was no longer relevant, and the other three were converted to TODOs.
QE notes: No
Doc notes: No
Bugs: N/A
Reviewer: Me - only comment changes, no code changes.
Tests run: Checkintests
Is noteworthy for integration: No
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/components/List.as
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/components/supportClasses/ListBase.as

[svn:fx-trunk] 7753: Adding backgroundFrameRate property to WindowedApplication, to by default reduce the CPU usage in cases where an app is not 'active'.

Revision: 7753
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-06-11 12:29:44 -0700 (Thu, 11 Jun 2009)
Log Message:
Adding backgroundFrameRate property to WindowedApplication, to by default reduce the CPU usage in cases where an app is not 'active'.
Bugs: SDK-21135
Reviewer: Ryan, Darrell
QE Notes: Test needs to be written for this new API. PARB has tentatively approved, will update spec here: http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/flexsdk/Spark+WindowedApplication
Doc Notes: Needs to be documented and ASDoc scrubbed.
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-21135
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/airframework/src/mx/core/WindowedApplication.as
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/airframework/src/spark/components/WindowedApplication. as

Hi,
when the pageFlow scope map is preserved on task flow exit then this is a bug. Can you file it ?
Frank

[svn:fx-trunk] 9703: Addressing NativeDragManager issue where we would inadvertently replace the users drag drag feedback with our default .

Revision: 9703
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-08-27 12:51:06 -0700 (Thu, 27 Aug 2009)
Log Message:
Addressing NativeDragManager issue where we would inadvertently replace the users drag drag feedback with our default.
QE notes: None
Doc notes: None
Bugs: SDK-20458
Reviewer: Jason
Tests run: Checkin
Is noteworthy for integration: No
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-20458
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/airframework/src/mx/managers/NativeDragManagerImpl.as

[svn:fx-trunk] 12814: Addressing focus issue in DataGrid introduced by a recent fix.

Revision: 12814
Revision: 12814
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-12-10 15:18:25 -0800 (Thu, 10 Dec 2009)
Log Message:
Addressing focus issue in DataGrid introduced by a recent fix.
QE notes: None
Doc notes: None
Bugs: SDK-24665
Reviewer: Alex
Tests run: Checkin
Is noteworthy for integration: No
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-24665
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/controls/DataGrid.as

Revision: 12814
Revision: 12814
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-12-10 15:18:25 -0800 (Thu, 10 Dec 2009)
Log Message:
Addressing focus issue in DataGrid introduced by a recent fix.
QE notes: None
Doc notes: None
Bugs: SDK-24665
Reviewer: Alex
Tests run: Checkin
Is noteworthy for integration: No
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-24665
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/controls/DataGrid.as

[svn:bz-trunk] 17010: Bug: Watson #2652870 - use a property file to drive the custom configuration tokens as opposed to setting it in the command line

Revision: 17010
Revision: 17010
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2010-07-22 02:52:41 -0700 (Thu, 22 Jul 2010)
Log Message:
Bug: Watson #2652870 - use a property file to drive the custom configuration tokens as opposed to setting it in the command line
QA: Yes
Doc: Yes - in custom tokens section, talk about the new token.file option
Checkintests: Pass
Details: Changed TokenReplacer to look for a token.file JVM option. If it's specified (eg. -Dtoken.file=/User/matamel/Desktop/token.properties), then TokenReplacer looks for a properties file where token name and values are specified. This allows someone to specify a file for custom tokens. Custom tokens can still be specified as straight JVM option and in case where a token is defined both as a JVM option and in a token properties file, JVM option takes precedence.
Modified Paths:
    blazeds/trunk/modules/common/src/flex/messaging/config/TokenReplacer.java

Remember that Arch Arm is a different distribution, but we try to bend the rules and provide limited support for them. This may or may not be unique to Arch Arm, so you might try asking on their forums as well.

[svn:fx-trunk] 11483: Adding a LRU cache for the transcoding results of a CFF based DefineFont4 tag to avoid transcoding the same font description twice .

Revision: 11483
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-11-05 16:01:37 -0800 (Thu, 05 Nov 2009)
Log Message:
Adding a LRU cache for the transcoding results of a CFF based DefineFont4 tag to avoid transcoding the same font description twice.
Also we now throw a better error when CFFFontManager is asked to embed a local font by name as this is not yet supported.
QE notes: Please test that the same font embedded twice does not take twice as long as a single embedding.
Doc notes: N/A
Bugs:
SDK-23966 - Compiler should generate a warning or error when embedAsCFF is true and src:local is used for font embedding
SDK-23806 - OEM compiler appears to transcode embedded fonts twice
SDK-23788 - Search fonts recursively
Reviewer: Paul
Tests run: Checkintests, bug test cases
Is noteworthy for integration: Yes
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-23966
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-23806
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/SDK-23788
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/lib/flex-fontkit.jar
    flex/sdk/trunk/modules/swfutils/src/java/flash/fonts/FontDescription.java
    flex/sdk/trunk/modules/swfutils/src/java/flash/swf/tags/DefineFont4.java

[svn:fx-trunk] 12912: With TLF 571 checked in we can now revert the MXML 2009 changes for how the id language attribute is processed .

Revision: 12912
Revision: 12912
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2009-12-14 12:08:35 -0800 (Mon, 14 Dec 2009)
Log Message:
With TLF 571 checked in we can now revert the MXML 2009 changes for how the id language attribute is processed.
An unqualified id property will no longer be seen as a setter for a normal public, writable, non-static "id" property - which matches Flex 3 behavior.
As in earlier versions of Flex, the mechanism to retain MXML id attribute information at runtime is to implement mx.core.IMXMLObject. The compiler will generate a call to the intialized() method and pass in the id information.
Note: One exception to this rule seems to be UIComponent which instead get id attribute information via mx.core.IDeferredInstantiationUIComponent (although there seems to be a TODO in the codebase to remove this mechanism and thus should not be relied on by third parties).
QE notes: Please add tests for the TLF id property on flow elements (div, span, p, etc).
Doc notes: Please check that we have not documented
Bugs: N/A
Reviewer: Paul
Tests run: Checkintests, local test cases.
Is noteworthy for integration: Yes
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/FrameworkClasses.as
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/core/UIComponent.as
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/core/SpriteVisualElement.as
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/primitives/supportClasses/GraphicEleme nt.as
    flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/mxml/builder/ComponentBuilder.jav a
    flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/mxml/lang/StandardDefs.java
    flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/mxml/reflect/Type.java
    flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/mxml/reflect/TypeTable.java
    flex/sdk/trunk/modules/compiler/src/java/flex2/compiler/mxml/rep/init/ValueInitializer.ja va
Removed Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/core/IID.as

This is a duplicate post. This should be locked to avoid further confusion.
My CSS wont change
Nancy O.

[svn:fx-trunk] 16267: Added better baseline support for ConstraintLayout.

Revision: 16267
Revision: 16267
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2010-05-20 15:24:53 -0700 (Thu, 20 May 2010)
Log Message:
Added better baseline support for ConstraintLayout. ConstraintRow's now have a baseline property. It can either be a number or of the form "maxAscent:x". In the first case, it will position elements at that y-pixel value in the row based on their baseline position. Otherwise, it first aligns elements to the maximum baseline position of the elements in the row, and then, positions elements based on the pixel value provided. This support allows elements with different baselinePositions to be aligned more easily.
QE notes: No
Doc notes: No
Bugs: No
Reviewer: Jason
Tests run: checkintests
Is noteworthy for integration: No
Modified Paths:
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/framework/src/mx/containers/utilityClasses/ConstraintR ow.as
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/bundles/en_US/layout.properties
    flex/sdk/trunk/frameworks/projects/spark/src/spark/layouts/ConstraintLayout.as

[svn:fx-trunk] 11933: Addressing an edge case for TileList where at times the listItems array doesn 't accurately reflect a fully realized set of item renderers.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for