Sync Send without a Exception Handler ??
hi..
Can a synchronous send step work with out an exception handler..??
im gettin my messages and combinin then n sendin via the sync send to call rfc , followeed by a send back to my server..
at this very stage it expects me to define a handler for the same for the sync send.
regards,
vishal
hi bhavesh..
im doin the same...
Mode : Synch
Request Message
Response Message
Receiver From : Send Context
any reason fr it dmandin fr an exception handler../
it tch details i see the error as "no handler defined for this system exception"..
any inputs..
Similar Messages
-
BPM Process - Exception handling or timeout issues?
Hi Guys,
I have a BPM process as below.
1. Receive step: Receive the file with multiple transactions.
2. Transformation step: Split the file into individual transactions
3 Block step which includes -- par for each mode
1. Send Step (Synchronus): Each individual transaction needs to contact the 3rd party system and get the response. -- Do i need to handle any exceptions here ?
2. Container : Collect all the responses
Block ends
4. Transformation: combine all the responses in to a single file
5. Send Step: synchronus -- send the above single file and get the response back
6. Transformation : Transform the above response into the target structure.
7. Send: send the message asynchronusly to the target system
I need suggestion regarding the exceptional handling or any time out issues, i need to take care of.
any suggestions would be really appreciated
Thanks,
Raj
Edited by: raj reddy on Feb 12, 2009 10:12 PMHi,
I) For the Block holding the Sync Send, create an Exception Block. (right click on Sync Send -> Insert -> Exception Branch)
II) Name the Exception block (ex: exceptionHandler).
III) in the Sync Send step ->Properties -> Exceptions -> in System Error - add exceptionHandler.
IV) Now within the Exception handler block you can create containers to hold values from payload, throw exception as email etc).
This will cover your sync send step incase there is an error while sending the request of a timeout during receiving the response.
You can also do the same for the Step 7) Asycn send - if required.
Another suggestion in your question Step 6) can be done outside the bpm, when you do the interface determination for that Asycn Send you can add the Interface mapping that will map the responses to the target structure.
Doing this will reduce one step in your BPM. For further information in how more you can fine tune your bpm, read this blog - https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/5113. [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
All the best.
Regards,
Balaji.M -
PL/SQL 101 : Exception Handling
Frequently I see questions and issues around the use of Exception/Error Handling in PL/SQL. More often than not the issue comes from the questioners misunderstanding about how PL/SQL is constructed and executed, so I thought I'd write a small article covering the key concepts to give a clear picture of how it all hangs together. (Note: the examples are just showing examples of the exception handling structure, and should not be taken as truly valid code for ways of handling things)
Exception Handling
Contents
1. Understanding Execution Blocks (part 1)
2. Execution of the Execution Block
3. Exceptions
4. Understanding Execution Blocks (part 2)
5. How to continue exection of statements after an exception
6. User defined exceptions
7. Line number of exception
8. Exceptions within code within the exception block
1. Understanding Execution Blocks (part 1)
The first thing that one needs to understand is almost taking us back to the basics of PL/SQL... how a PL/SQL execution block is constructed.
Essentially an execution block is made of 3 sections...
+---------------------------+
| Declaration Section |
+---------------------------+
| Statements Section |
+---------------------------+
| Exception Section |
+---------------------------+
The Declaration section is the part defined between the PROCEDURE/FUNCTION header or the DECLARE keyword (for anonymous blocks) and the BEGIN keyword. (Optional section)
The Statements section is where your code goes and lies between the BEGIN keyword and the EXCEPTION keyword (or END keyword if there is no EXCEPTION section). (Mandatory section)
The Exception section is where any exception handling goes and lies between the EXCEPTION keyword at the END keyword. (Optional section)
Example of an anonymous block...
DECLARE
.. declarative statements go here ..
BEGIN
.. code statements go here ..
EXCEPTION
.. exception handlers go here ..
END;
Example of a procedure/function block...
[CREATE OR REPLACE] (PROCEDURE|FUNCTION) <proc or fn name> [(<parameters>)] [RETURN <datatype>] (IS|AS)
.. declarative statements go here ..
BEGIN
.. code statements go here ..
EXCEPTION
.. exception handlers go here ..
END;
(Note: The same can also be done for packages, but let's keep it simple)
2. Execution of the Execution Block
This may seem a simple concept, but it's surprising how many people have issues showing they haven't grasped it. When an Execution block is entered, the declaration section is processed, creating a scope of variables, types , cursors, etc. to be visible to the execution block and then execution enters into the Statements section. Each statment in the statements section is executed in turn and when the execution completes the last statment the execution block is exited back to whatever called it.
3. Exceptions
Exceptions generally happen during the execution of statements in the Statements section. When an exception happens the execution of statements jumps immediately into the exception section. In this section we can specify what exceptions we wish to 'capture' or 'trap' and do one of the two following things...
(Note: The exception section still has access to all the declared items in the declaration section)
3.i) Handle the exception
We do this when we recognise what the exception is (most likely it's something we expect to happen) and we have a means of dealing with it so that our application can continue on.
Example...
(without the exception handler the exception is passed back to the calling code, in this case SQL*Plus)
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 declare
2 v_name VARCHAR2(20);
3 begin
4 select ename
5 into v_name
6 from emp
7 where empno = &empno;
8 dbms_output.put_line(v_name);
9* end;
SQL> /
Enter value for empno: 123
old 7: where empno = &empno;
new 7: where empno = 123;
declare
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01403: no data found
ORA-06512: at line 4
(with an exception handler, we capture the exception, handle it how we want to, and the calling code is happy that there is no error for it to report)
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 declare
2 v_name VARCHAR2(20);
3 begin
4 select ename
5 into v_name
6 from emp
7 where empno = &empno;
8 dbms_output.put_line(v_name);
9 exception
10 when no_data_found then
11 dbms_output.put_line('There is no employee with this employee number.');
12* end;
SQL> /
Enter value for empno: 123
old 7: where empno = &empno;
new 7: where empno = 123;
There is no employee with this employee number.
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
3.ii) Raise the exception
We do this when:-
a) we recognise the exception, handle it but still want to let the calling code know that it happened
b) we recognise the exception, wish to log it happened and then let the calling code deal with it
c) we don't recognise the exception and we want the calling code to deal with it
Example of b)
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 declare
2 v_name VARCHAR2(20);
3 v_empno NUMBER := &empno;
4 begin
5 select ename
6 into v_name
7 from emp
8 where empno = v_empno;
9 dbms_output.put_line(v_name);
10 EXCEPTION
11 WHEN no_data_found THEN
12 INSERT INTO sql_errors (txt)
13 VALUES ('Search for '||v_empno||' failed.');
14 COMMIT;
15 RAISE;
16* end;
SQL> /
Enter value for empno: 123
old 3: v_empno NUMBER := &empno;
new 3: v_empno NUMBER := 123;
declare
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01403: no data found
ORA-06512: at line 15
SQL> select * from sql_errors;
TXT
Search for 123 failed.
SQL>
Example of c)
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 declare
2 v_name VARCHAR2(20);
3 v_empno NUMBER := &empno;
4 begin
5 select ename
6 into v_name
7 from emp
8 where empno = v_empno;
9 dbms_output.put_line(v_name);
10 EXCEPTION
11 WHEN no_data_found THEN
12 INSERT INTO sql_errors (txt)
13 VALUES ('Search for '||v_empno||' failed.');
14 COMMIT;
15 RAISE;
16 WHEN others THEN
17 RAISE;
18* end;
SQL> /
Enter value for empno: 'ABC'
old 3: v_empno NUMBER := &empno;
new 3: v_empno NUMBER := 'ABC';
declare
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: character to number conversion error
ORA-06512: at line 3
SQL> select * from sql_errors;
TXT
Search for 123 failed.
SQL>
As you can see from the sql_errors log table, no log was written so the WHEN others exception was the exception that raised the error to the calling code (SQL*Plus)
4. Understanding Execution Blocks (part 2)
Ok, so now we understand the very basics of an execution block and what happens when an exception happens. Let's take it a step further...
Execution blocks are not just a single simple block in most cases. Often, during our statements section we have a need to call some reusable code and we do that by calling a procedure or function. Effectively this nests the procedure or function's code as another execution block within the current statement section so, in terms of execution, we end up with something like...
+---------------------------------+
| Declaration Section |
+---------------------------------+
| Statements Section |
| . |
| +---------------------------+ |
| | Declaration Section | |
| +---------------------------+ |
| | Statements Section | |
| +---------------------------+ |
| | Exception Section | |
| +---------------------------+ |
| . |
+---------------------------------+
| Exception Section |
+---------------------------------+
Example... (Note: log_trace just writes some text to a table for tracing)
SQL> create or replace procedure a as
2 v_dummy NUMBER := log_trace('Procedure A''s Declaration Section');
3 begin
4 v_dummy := log_trace('Procedure A''s Statement Section');
5 v_dummy := 1/0; -- cause an exception
6 exception
7 when others then
8 v_dummy := log_trace('Procedure A''s Exception Section');
9 raise;
10 end;
11 /
Procedure created.
SQL> create or replace procedure b as
2 v_dummy NUMBER := log_trace('Procedure B''s Declaration Section');
3 begin
4 v_dummy := log_trace('Procedure B''s Statement Section');
5 a; -- HERE the execution passes to the declare/statement/exception sections of A
6 exception
7 when others then
8 v_dummy := log_trace('Procedure B''s Exception Section');
9 raise;
10 end;
11 /
Procedure created.
SQL> exec b;
BEGIN b; END;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01476: divisor is equal to zero
ORA-06512: at "SCOTT.B", line 9
ORA-06512: at line 1
SQL> select * from code_trace;
TXT
Procedure B's Declaration Section
Procedure B's Statement Section
Procedure A's Declaration Section
Procedure A's Statement Section
Procedure A's Exception Section
Procedure B's Exception Section
6 rows selected.
SQL>
Likewise, execution blocks can be nested deeper and deeper.
5. How to continue exection of statements after an exception
One of the common questions asked is how to return execution to the statement after the one that created the exception and continue on.
Well, firstly, you can only do this for statements you expect to raise an exception, such as when you want to check if there is no data found in a query.
If you consider what's been shown above you could put any statement you expect to cause an exception inside it's own procedure or function with it's own exception section to handle the exception without raising it back to the calling code. However, the nature of procedures and functions is really to provide a means of re-using code, so if it's a statement you only use once it seems a little silly to go creating individual procedures for these.
Instead, you nest execution blocks directly, to give the same result as shown in the diagram at the start of part 4 of this article.
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 create or replace procedure b (p_empno IN VARCHAR2) as
2 v_dummy NUMBER := log_trace('Procedure B''s Declaration Section');
3 begin
4 v_dummy := log_trace('Procedure B''s Statement Section');
5 -- Here we start another execution block nested in the first one...
6 declare
7 v_dummy NUMBER := log_trace('Nested Block Declaration Section');
8 begin
9 v_dummy := log_trace('Nested Block Statement Section');
10 select empno
11 into v_dummy
12 from emp
13 where empno = p_empno; -- Note: the parameters and variables from
parent execution block are available to use!
14 exception
15 when no_data_found then
16 -- This is an exception we can handle so we don't raise it
17 v_dummy := log_trace('No employee was found');
18 v_dummy := log_trace('Nested Block Exception Section - Exception Handled');
19 when others then
20 -- Other exceptions we can't handle so we raise them
21 v_dummy := log_trace('Nested Block Exception Section - Exception Raised');
22 raise;
23 end;
24 -- ...Here endeth the nested execution block
25 -- As the nested block handled it's exception we come back to here...
26 v_dummy := log_trace('Procedure B''s Statement Section Continued');
27 exception
28 when others then
29 -- We'll only get to here if an unhandled exception was raised
30 -- either in the nested block or in procedure b's statement section
31 v_dummy := log_trace('Procedure B''s Exception Section');
32 raise;
33* end;
SQL> /
Procedure created.
SQL> exec b(123);
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> select * from code_trace;
TXT
Procedure B's Declaration Section
Procedure B's Statement Section
Nested Block Declaration Section
Nested Block Statement Section
No employee was found
Nested Block Exception Section - Exception Handled
Procedure B's Statement Section Continued
7 rows selected.
SQL> truncate table code_trace;
Table truncated.
SQL> exec b('ABC');
BEGIN b('ABC'); END;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01722: invalid number
ORA-06512: at "SCOTT.B", line 32
ORA-06512: at line 1
SQL> select * from code_trace;
TXT
Procedure B's Declaration Section
Procedure B's Statement Section
Nested Block Declaration Section
Nested Block Statement Section
Nested Block Exception Section - Exception Raised
Procedure B's Exception Section
6 rows selected.
SQL>
You can see from this that, very simply, the code that we expected may have an exception was able to either handle the exception and return to the outer execution block to continue execution, or if an unexpected exception occurred then it was able to be raised up to the outer exception section.
6. User defined exceptions
There are three sorts of 'User Defined' exceptions. There are logical situations (e.g. business logic) where, for example, certain criteria are not met to complete a task, and there are existing Oracle errors that you wish to give a name to in order to capture them in the exception section. The third is raising your own exception messages with our own exception numbers. Let's look at the first one...
Let's say I have tables which detail stock availablility and reorder levels...
SQL> select * from reorder_level;
ITEM_ID STOCK_LEVEL
1 20
2 20
3 10
4 2
5 2
SQL> select * from stock;
ITEM_ID ITEM_DESC STOCK_LEVEL
1 Pencils 10
2 Pens 2
3 Notepads 25
4 Stapler 5
5 Hole Punch 3
SQL>
Now, our Business has told the administrative clerk to check stock levels and re-order anything that is below the re-order level, but not to hold stock of more than 4 times the re-order level for any particular item. As an IT department we've been asked to put together an application that will automatically produce the re-order documents upon the clerks request and, because our company is so tight-ar*ed about money, they don't want to waste any paper with incorrect printouts so we have to ensure the clerk can't order things they shouldn't.
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 create or replace procedure re_order(p_item_id NUMBER, p_quantity NUMBER) is
2 cursor cur_stock_reorder is
3 select s.stock_level
4 ,r.stock_level as reorder_level
5 ,(r.stock_level*4) as reorder_limit
6 from stock s join reorder_level r on (s.item_id = r.item_id)
7 where s.item_id = p_item_id;
8 --
9 v_stock cur_stock_reorder%ROWTYPE;
10 begin
11 OPEN cur_stock_reorder;
12 FETCH cur_stock_reorder INTO v_stock;
13 IF cur_stock_reorder%NOTFOUND THEN
14 RAISE no_data_found;
15 END IF;
16 CLOSE cur_stock_reorder;
17 --
18 IF v_stock.stock_level >= v_stock.reorder_level THEN
19 -- Stock is not low enough to warrant an order
20 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Stock has not reached re-order level yet!');
21 ELSE
22 IF v_stock.stock_level + p_quantity > v_stock.reorder_limit THEN
23 -- Required amount is over-ordering
24 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Quantity specified is too much. Max for this item: '
||to_char(v_stock.reorder_limit-v_stock.stock_level));
25 ELSE
26 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Order OK. Printing Order...');
27 -- Here goes our code to print the order
28 END IF;
29 END IF;
30 --
31 exception
32 WHEN no_data_found THEN
33 CLOSE cur_stock_reorder;
34 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Invalid Item ID.');
35* end;
SQL> /
Procedure created.
SQL> exec re_order(10,100);
Invalid Item ID.
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> exec re_order(3,40);
Stock has not reached re-order level yet!
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> exec re_order(1,100);
Quantity specified is too much. Max for this item: 70
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> exec re_order(2,50);
Order OK. Printing Order...
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>
Ok, so that code works, but it's a bit messy with all those nested IF statements. Is there a cleaner way perhaps? Wouldn't it be nice if we could set up our own exceptions...
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 create or replace procedure re_order(p_item_id NUMBER, p_quantity NUMBER) is
2 cursor cur_stock_reorder is
3 select s.stock_level
4 ,r.stock_level as reorder_level
5 ,(r.stock_level*4) as reorder_limit
6 from stock s join reorder_level r on (s.item_id = r.item_id)
7 where s.item_id = p_item_id;
8 --
9 v_stock cur_stock_reorder%ROWTYPE;
10 --
11 -- Let's declare our own exceptions for business logic...
12 exc_not_warranted EXCEPTION;
13 exc_too_much EXCEPTION;
14 begin
15 OPEN cur_stock_reorder;
16 FETCH cur_stock_reorder INTO v_stock;
17 IF cur_stock_reorder%NOTFOUND THEN
18 RAISE no_data_found;
19 END IF;
20 CLOSE cur_stock_reorder;
21 --
22 IF v_stock.stock_level >= v_stock.reorder_level THEN
23 -- Stock is not low enough to warrant an order
24 RAISE exc_not_warranted;
25 END IF;
26 --
27 IF v_stock.stock_level + p_quantity > v_stock.reorder_limit THEN
28 -- Required amount is over-ordering
29 RAISE exc_too_much;
30 END IF;
31 --
32 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Order OK. Printing Order...');
33 -- Here goes our code to print the order
34 --
35 exception
36 WHEN no_data_found THEN
37 CLOSE cur_stock_reorder;
38 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Invalid Item ID.');
39 WHEN exc_not_warranted THEN
40 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Stock has not reached re-order level yet!');
41 WHEN exc_too_much THEN
42 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Quantity specified is too much. Max for this item: '
||to_char(v_stock.reorder_limit-v_stock.stock_level));
43* end;
SQL> /
Procedure created.
SQL> exec re_order(10,100);
Invalid Item ID.
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> exec re_order(3,40);
Stock has not reached re-order level yet!
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> exec re_order(1,100);
Quantity specified is too much. Max for this item: 70
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> exec re_order(2,50);
Order OK. Printing Order...
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>
That's better. And now we don't have to use all those nested IF statements and worry about it accidently getting to code that will print the order out as, once one of our user defined exceptions is raised, execution goes from the Statements section into the Exception section and all handling of errors is done in one place.
Now for the second sort of user defined exception...
A new requirement has come in from the Finance department who want to have details shown on the order that show a re-order 'indicator' based on the formula ((maximum allowed stock - current stock)/re-order quantity), so this needs calculating and passing to the report...
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 create or replace procedure re_order(p_item_id NUMBER, p_quantity NUMBER) is
2 cursor cur_stock_reorder is
3 select s.stock_level
4 ,r.stock_level as reorder_level
5 ,(r.stock_level*4) as reorder_limit
6 ,(((r.stock_level*4)-s.stock_level)/p_quantity) as finance_factor
7 from stock s join reorder_level r on (s.item_id = r.item_id)
8 where s.item_id = p_item_id;
9 --
10 v_stock cur_stock_reorder%ROWTYPE;
11 --
12 -- Let's declare our own exceptions for business logic...
13 exc_not_warranted EXCEPTION;
14 exc_too_much EXCEPTION;
15 begin
16 OPEN cur_stock_reorder;
17 FETCH cur_stock_reorder INTO v_stock;
18 IF cur_stock_reorder%NOTFOUND THEN
19 RAISE no_data_found;
20 END IF;
21 CLOSE cur_stock_reorder;
22 --
23 IF v_stock.stock_level >= v_stock.reorder_level THEN
24 -- Stock is not low enough to warrant an order
25 RAISE exc_not_warranted;
26 END IF;
27 --
28 IF v_stock.stock_level + p_quantity > v_stock.reorder_limit THEN
29 -- Required amount is over-ordering
30 RAISE exc_too_much;
31 END IF;
32 --
33 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Order OK. Printing Order...');
34 -- Here goes our code to print the order, passing the finance_factor
35 --
36 exception
37 WHEN no_data_found THEN
38 CLOSE cur_stock_reorder;
39 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Invalid Item ID.');
40 WHEN exc_not_warranted THEN
41 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Stock has not reached re-order level yet!');
42 WHEN exc_too_much THEN
43 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Quantity specified is too much. Max for this item: '
||to_char(v_stock.reorder_limit-v_stock.stock_level));
44* end;
SQL> /
Procedure created.
SQL> exec re_order(2,40);
Order OK. Printing Order...
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL> exec re_order(2,0);
BEGIN re_order(2,0); END;
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-01476: divisor is equal to zero
ORA-06512: at "SCOTT.RE_ORDER", line 17
ORA-06512: at line 1
SQL>
Hmm, there's a problem if the person specifies a re-order quantity of zero. It raises an unhandled exception.
Well, we could put a condition/check into our code to make sure the parameter is not zero, but again we would be wrapping our code in an IF statement and not dealing with the exception in the exception handler.
We could do as we did before and just include a simple IF statement to check the value and raise our own user defined exception but, in this instance the error is standard Oracle error (ORA-01476) so we should be able to capture it inside the exception handler anyway... however...
EXCEPTION
WHEN ORA-01476 THEN
... is not valid. What we need is to give this Oracle error a name.
This is done by declaring a user defined exception as we did before and then associating that name with the error number using the PRAGMA EXCEPTION_INIT statement in the declaration section.
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 create or replace procedure re_order(p_item_id NUMBER, p_quantity NUMBER) is
2 cursor cur_stock_reorder is
3 select s.stock_level
4 ,r.stock_level as reorder_level
5 ,(r.stock_level*4) as reorder_limit
6 ,(((r.stock_level*4)-s.stock_level)/p_quantity) as finance_factor
7 from stock s join reorder_level r on (s.item_id = r.item_id)
8 where s.item_id = p_item_id;
9 --
10 v_stock cur_stock_reorder%ROWTYPE;
11 --
12 -- Let's declare our own exceptions for business logic...
13 exc_not_warranted EXCEPTION;
14 exc_too_much EXCEPTION;
15 --
16 exc_zero_quantity EXCEPTION;
17 PRAGMA EXCEPTION_INIT(exc_zero_quantity, -1476);
18 begin
19 OPEN cur_stock_reorder;
20 FETCH cur_stock_reorder INTO v_stock;
21 IF cur_stock_reorder%NOTFOUND THEN
22 RAISE no_data_found;
23 END IF;
24 CLOSE cur_stock_reorder;
25 --
26 IF v_stock.stock_level >= v_stock.reorder_level THEN
27 -- Stock is not low enough to warrant an order
28 RAISE exc_not_warranted;
29 END IF;
30 --
31 IF v_stock.stock_level + p_quantity > v_stock.reorder_limit THEN
32 -- Required amount is over-ordering
33 RAISE exc_too_much;
34 END IF;
35 --
36 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Order OK. Printing Order...');
37 -- Here goes our code to print the order, passing the finance_factor
38 --
39 exception
40 WHEN exc_zero_quantity THEN
41 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Quantity of 0 (zero) is invalid.');
42 WHEN no_data_found THEN
43 CLOSE cur_stock_reorder;
44 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Invalid Item ID.');
45 WHEN exc_not_warranted THEN
46 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Stock has not reached re-order level yet!');
47 WHEN exc_too_much THEN
48 DBMS_OUTPUT.PUT_LINE('Quantity specified is too much. Max for this item: '
||to_char(v_stock.reorder_limit-v_stock.stock_level));
49* end;
SQL> /
Procedure created.
SQL> exec re_order(2,0);
Quantity of 0 (zero) is invalid.
PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL>
Lastly, let's look at raising our own exceptions with our own exception numbers...
SQL> ed
Wrote file afiedt.buf
1 create or replace procedure re_order(p_item_id NUMBER, p_quantity NUMBER) is
2 cursor cur_stock_reorder is
3 select s.stock_level
4 ,r.stock_level as reorder_level
5 ,(r.stock_level*4) as reorder_limit
6 ,(((r.stock_level*4)-s.stock_level)/p_quantity) as finance_factor
7 from stock s join reorder_level r on (s.item_id = r.item_id)
8 where s.item_id = p_item_id;
9 --
10 v_stock cur_stock_reorder%ROWTYPE;
11 --
12 exc_zero_quantity EXCEPTION;
13 PRAGMA EXCEPTION_INIT(exc_zero_quantity, -1476);
14 begin
15 OPEN cur_stock_reorder;
16 FETCH cur_stock_reorder INTO v_stock;
17 IF cur_stock_reorder%NOTFOUND THEN
18 RAISE no_data_found;
19 END IF;
20 CLOSE cur_stock_reorder;
21 --
22 IF v_stock.stock_level >= v_stock.reorder_level THEN
23 -- Stock is not low enough to warrant an order
24 [b]RAISE_APPLICATION_ERROR(-20000, 'Stock has not reached re-order level yet!');[/b]
25 END IF;
26 --
27 IF v_stock.stock_level + p_quantity > v_stock.reorder_limit THEN
28 -- Required amount is over-ordering
29its nice article, have put up this one the blog
site,Nah, I don't have time to blog, but if one of the other Ace's/Experts wants to copy it to a blog with reference back to here (and all due credit given ;)) then that's fine by me.
I'd go for a book like "Selected articles by OTN members" or something. Does anybody have a list of links of all those mentioned articles?Just these ones I've bookmarked...
Introduction to regular expressions ... by CD
When your query takes too long ... by Rob van Wijk
How to pipeline a function with a dynamic number of columns? by ascheffer
PL/SQL 101 : Exception Handling by BluShadow -
Exception Handling in bounded taskflows - expected behaviour
Hi,
I'm currently reviewing exception handling in bounded task flows and some things does not seems to be very clear for me.
(q1) Does it make sense that a bounded task flow calls a method (via a method activity) defined on the page definition of another page (outside of the BTF) by using a #{data.xxxmyPageDef.myMethodName.execute} EL expression?
(q2) Is is correct to expect the application to execute the method marked as ExceptionHandler in the taskflow, whenever an exception occurs?
(q3) I created 5 different scenarios where I call a service method which throws an exception, from within a page fragment of the BTF.
(q3 – sc1) Call a service method through the binding layer of the current page (by using #{bindings.xxx.execute})
Result: A dialog containing the exception message appears.
This is what I expected. Althought, the exception handler method does not seems to be invoked.(q3 – sc2) Call a service method through a task flow method activity using #{bindings.xxx.execute}
Result: A dialog containing the exception message appears.
This is what I expected. Althought, the exception handler method does not seems to be invoked.(q3 – sc3) Call a service method through a task flow method activity using #{data.myPageFragementPagedef.xxx.execute} (accessing the pageDef of the page fragment)
Result: Nothing happens.
This is not what I expected. Although, the exception handler method does nog seems to be invoked, I expect the ADF Error Handler to create a FacesMessage.(q3 – sc4) Call a service method through a task flow method activity using #{data.myPageContainingThePageFragmentPageDef.xxx.execute} (accessing the page containing the BTF region)
Result: Nothing happens.
This is not what I expected. Although, the exception handler method does nog seems to be invoked, I expect the ADF Error Handler to create a FacesMessage. (q3 – sc5) Call a service method through a task flow method activity using #{data.aPageOutsideTheBTFPageDef.xxx.execute} (accessing a page outside the BTW)
Result: Nothing happens.
This is not what I expected. Although, the exception handler method does nog seems to be invoked, I expect the ADF Error Handler to create a FacesMessage. (q4) How can it be possible that – without an exception handler – exceptions occur when calling method activities, without the exceptions being translated to FacesMessages?
Thanks in advance,
Koen Verhulst
JDeveloper 11.1.1.4Koen,
+(q1) Does it make sense that a bounded task flow calls a method (via a method activity) defined on the page definition of another page (outside of the BTF) by using a #{data.xxxmyPageDef.myMethodName.execute} EL expression?+
No. Exceptions should be handled locally.
+(q2) Is is correct to expect the application to execute the method marked as ExceptionHandler in the taskflow, whenever an exception occurs?+
Only for exceptions that are before Render Response. The Render Response Phase is not handled in ADFc. So exceptions that occur in managed beans may fall through
+(q3) I created 5 different scenarios where I call a service method which throws an exception, from within a page fragment of the BTF.+
+(q3 – sc1) Call a service method through the binding layer of the current page (by using #{bindings.xxx.execute}) Result: A dialog containing the exception message appears.+
This is what I expected. Althought, the exception handler method does not seems to be invoked.
The binding layer has an error handler you can override in the DataBinings.cpx file
+(q3 – sc2) Call a service method through a task flow method activity using #{bindings.xxx.execute}+
Result: A dialog containing the exception message appears.
This is what I expected. Althought, the exception handler method does not seems to be invoked.
Again, you use the binding layer to invoke the service
+(q3 – sc3) Call a service method through a task flow method activity using #{data.myPageFragementPagedef.xxx.execute} (accessing the pageDef of the page fragment)+
Result: Nothing happens.
This is not what I expected. Although, the exception handler method does nog seems to be invoked, I expect the ADF Error Handler to create a FacesMessage.
Never use such a call. Its bad practice as there is no guarantee the container you reference is active. Always have the method call activity have its own binding defined when accessing a method call activity. I know there are lots of example floating aroundthat you #{data ...} and many are from 10.1.3. This should be avoided alltogether though
+(q3 – sc4) Call a service method through a task flow method activity using #{data.myPageContainingThePageFragmentPageDef.xxx.execute} (accessing the page containing the BTF region)+
Result: Nothing happens.
This is not what I expected. Although, the exception handler method does not seems to be invoked, I expect the ADF Error Handler to create a FacesMessage.
Again, this is not a proper use of the ADF framework.
+(q3 – sc5) Call a service method through a task flow method activity using #{data.aPageOutsideTheBTFPageDef.xxx.execute} (accessing a page outside the BTW)+
Result: Nothing happens. This is not what I expected. Although, the exception handler method does nog seems to be invoked, I expect the ADF Error Handler to create a FacesMessage.
accessing a page outside the BTW (!!!) This should ring a worst practices alarm on your laptop (obviously doesn't do it either)
+(q4) How can it be possible that – without an exception handler – exceptions occur when calling method activities, without the exceptions being translated to FacesMessages?+
Exceptions are not handled in a single place but stacked. The business service raises an exception and passes it to the binding layer if not handled. The binding layer handles the exception and if it can't passes it to ADFc. ADFc can handle this exception if it is not during Render Response.
Bottom line: There is no single point of exception handling. So as a recommendation for best practices
- Catch and handle exceptions as close as possible to their origins
- If things can go wrong, thy will - use try/catch blocks in managed beans
- Use an exception handling activity in all bounded task flows. In the case of task flow call activities being used exceptions can bubble up to the caller. However, this would take users out of their current application context
- Exceptions not handled in ADFc can be intercepted by overriding the application task flow exception handler (used by the exception handler activities). This would give you a chance e.g. to handle issues during Render Response
- Never fight the framework, never bend the framework: Don't use out of scope access to page definitions and resources. Exception handling is not a replacement for bad code practices (sorry for saying this, its not meant to be rude) :-)
Though I don't have a qualified numbers of bugs open for exception handling in ADF between 11.1.1.4 and now (and some that are open), but there are issues reported in this area. If there is something that really feels wrong, please go ahead and file a bug and provide a test case for development to have a look. The Render Response issue, for example is something we are aware of and that is in discussion (afaik knows, there is a change in exception handling in JSF 2 that may have an impact to what we can do in ADFc).
thanks
Frank -
Is Exception handler necessary for every stored subprogram
Hi All,
I knwo exception handler is very important. But is it necessary for every stored procedure or function?
For example,
procedure test(p_index_code IN varchar2(10)
p_changed_code OUT varchar2(15))
as
begin
IF p_index_code = 'A' then
p_changed_code := 'A'|| p_index_code;
elsif p_index_code = 'B' then
p_changed_code := 'B'|| p_index_code;
else
p_changed_code := p_index_code;
end if;
end;
This kind of simple procedures, do I have to add the 'exection when others than raise_application_error(-20001,'error in this SP')'?
I can't see obvious drawbacks without the exception handler in this CASE.
Best regards,
Leon
Edited by: user12064076 on Nov 11, 2010 7:12 PMuser12064076 wrote:
I knwo exception handler is very important. But is it necessary for every stored procedure or function?It is important to know WHY an exception handler is needed. There are couple of basic reasons why you want to use an exception handler.
The exception is not an error.
The exception raised is a technical error, but may not be a business or processing error. The typical example is the NO_DATA_FOUND exception. The business logic may say "+when there is no fixed discounts found, apply a 5% dis-count+". So not finding (dis-count) row data in such a case is not an exception. What does you exception handler do? It fixes the exception and there is not an exception anymore. In other words, the caller that called your code will never know that there was an exception.
Making the exception meaningful
An exception, like NO_DATA_FOUND, is not very meaningful. What is meaningful is NO_INVOICE_FOUND or NO_CUSTOMER_FOUND. Thus your exception handler can catch a generic exception and make it more meaningful by returning a custom application exception instead.
Action stations
Some exceptions will require you to clean up and fix what you can - kind of like action stations when a ship takes a hit. But as you cannot fix the exception, the exception must be passed to the caller so that it too can decide how to re-act to that exception. For example, you may have an open ref cursor or open UTL_FILE handle that needs to be closed when your code terminates. If not, your code will leak resources. So you need to trap exceptions that can occur, clean up, and then re-raise the exception (this is called a resource protection code block in other languages). You may have done a partial transaction - and the exception handler may need to roll back the changes your code made. The bottom line here is that you must re-raise the exception after you have done your "+action stations+" bit. You did not fix the exception. You did not make it more meaningful. In that case you must pass it back to the caller so that it can decide what it needs to do about that exception.
Using an exception for any other reason - that would likely be the wrong thing to do most of the time. -
Exception handling without BPM
Hello,
I have done exception handling with BPM.
i.e. when there exception comes in mapping I have use Block Exception Handler.
Can this be done without BPM.
Please snd me blog for it.
RegardsHi,
As explained by Michal it is correct, but in message mapping , we can raise an alert .
See the below links
Alerts with variables from the messages payload (XI) - UPDATED - /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/03/13/alerts-with-variables-from-the-messages-payload-xi--updated
Triggering XI Alerts from a User Defined Function - /people/bhavesh.kantilal/blog/2006/07/25/triggering-xi-alerts-from-a-user-defined-function
Regards
Chilla -
Exception handling of Transport acknowledgement in asynchronous send in BPM
HI,
A silly question, but your help would be greatly appreciated..
- I have a asynch send step in a BPM for sending data to the target system through RFC
- It has acknoweledgement property of this send step is set to transport acknowledgement
- The exception property of this send step is set to throw a 'RFCException'
- This send step is inside a block
- This block also has an Exception branch which catches this 'RFCException'
- now my RFC channel failed for some known reason, but the flow never went into the Exception branch
IS this behaviour of the 'transport acknowledgement' property of an asynch send step in BPM expected ?
What should I take care so that if my RFC receiver channel throws an exception, the flow of my BPM goes to the exception branch ??- now my RFC channel failed for some known reason, but the flow never went into the Exception branch
IS this behaviour of the 'transport acknowledgement' property of an asynch send step in BPM expected ?
What should I take care so that if my RFC receiver channel throws an exception, the flow of my BPM goes to the exception
branch ??
When an exception is caught by the Transport Acknowledgement it will trigger the Exception branch (if the send step is defined inside a Block with an Exception Branch)
I think you have not defined (and then assigned) a proper Exception Handler for the Block.
Click on the Block and define an Exception Handler......click on the Exception Branch and then select the Exception Handler from the dropdown......if this is not done then the Exception Branch wont be executed.....perform a check on your BPM in IR (using F7) you may get some warnings.
Regards,
Abhishek. -
Sync send in bpm and Exceptions raised
Hi,
I am using sync send step twice in ASYNC/SYNC bridge,once for database server and other one is for webserver.Wht kind of exceptions can occur for database connection failure and how i should catch in bpm.Please send me if any blogs are there.
Thanks
Best Regards,
Harleen Kaur ChadhaGenerally Synch send is used to call your reciever system synchronously (ie You are sending request and response at the same instance).You have to create a synchronous abstract interface in Message Interfaces and select that interace in Synch send step. You have to provide Input and output parameters also......
Check this for EX:
/people/arpit.seth/blog/2005/06/27/rfc-scenario-using-bpm--starter-kit -
How to check was the object bound or not without exception handling?
context.lookup("someName");throws NameNotFoundException in case object was not bound to someName.
How to check was the object bound or not without exception handling?context.lookup("someName");throws NameNotFoundException in case object was not bound to someName.
How to check was the object bound or not without exception handling? -
Mediator Exception Handling without fault policies
Hi,
Could somebody help me on defining exception handling to MEDIATOR component?
Is there is a way where we can do this without using the fault policies?
Thanks,
SV.Business faults are application-specific and are explicitly defined in the service WSDL file. You can handle business faults by defining the fault handlers in Oracle JDeveloper at design time. System faults occur because of some problem in the underlying system such as a network not being available. Oracle Mediator provides fault policy-based error handling for system faults.http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E21764_01/integration.1111/e10224/med_faulthandling.htm
Regards,
Anuj -
Sending a Message in Exception Handler
Is it possible to have a Send Step in an Exception Handler? How can I instantiate the Interface assigned to the Send step?
Regards
MikeI am calling an RFc synchrnously and when the Response comes in that part works fine as you can build an Abstract Interface for the Response which will be your out put for the BPM when everything went well.
But in case of an Exception from the RFC for the Fault Message type you cannot define an Abstract Interface.
I got this around by out putting the Request which is still avaialble in the BPM and did an interface mapping using the Request Abstract Interface. Manipulated the mapping to get the required result.
Let me know if you can do some other way. -
Hi guys,
I've implemented the following scenario:
BPM Process where I've got a async receive (from a file receiver), a sync send (to an ABAP PROXY) and a send async (to a file sender).
The scenario is working great, I've catched 'Communication exceptions', and the proxy contemplates the necessary exception throwers too, but I'm now trying to Handle one specific exception. Imagine you force a dump, with a divide by zero in the proxy code...the proxy will dump and the XI gets a mapping exception (like is supposed to).
The exception is:
<SAP:Code area="MAPPING">EXCEPTION_DURING_EXECUTE</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P2>com.sap.aii.utilxi.misc.api.BaseRuntimeException</SAP:P2>
<SAP:P3>RuntimeException in Message-Mapping transformatio~</SAP:P3>
The thing is, I want to catch this exception on the mapping and handle it, so the bpm process sends the handle response with the file sender.
I've looked to Alessandro Guarneri blog, but it's a little bit different, because I don't want to throw an exception but I'd like to handle it....
Can you guys help me with this question?Hi Vijaya,
I was able to catch the exception like you said, on the proxy side.
I'm trying to conceive some real and feasible dumps scenarios and for that I'm forcing dumps, and catching exceptions. Divisions by zero was one of the examples.
For division by zero I was able to catch it with a cx_sy_no_handler exception, but I've another example which I'm not being able to catch it.
I'm sendind an message e001(zisa), which will exit automatically from the function module. Am I able to catch that message? Meaning, can I catch it and treat it, instead of the system exiting the function and showing the corresponding message?Is there any cx_* ?
Even better, on sxmb_moni I get:
<SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="INTERNAL">HTTP_RESP_STATUS_CODE_NOT_OK</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1>500</SAP:P1>
<SAP:P2>Internal Server Error</SAP:P2>
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText><html> <body> <H1> 500 SAP Internal Server Error </H1> <B> Error message: </B> O centro nao existe ou nao esta preenchido. ( <B> type of termination: </B> ERROR_MESSAGE_STATE ) <BR /> </body> </html></SAP:AdditionalText>
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>HTTP response contains status code 500 with the description Internal Server Error Error when sending by HTTP (error code: 500, error text: Internal Server Error)</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>N</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
So, the SOAP adapter receives something. If it's not possible to catch this exception on the abap proxy side, can I catch and map that soap adapter error text on the BPM side?
Thanks a lot for all of your attention -
BPM - Exception handling in multiline mapping
Hi,
I have in a BPM a block with processing mode ParForEach containing a transformation and then a send step.
If the transformation (mapping) generates an exception for one of the lines of the multiline variable being processed, no subsequent lines are passed to the send step.
I want the process to execute the mapping for each line and then send messages corresponding to lines without error. How can I do?
Thank you
SimonaHi Simona,
I also feel that Michal had suggested the correct solution. Not sure why you are saying that the error gets propagated, if you have defined a proper Exception handling for the inner block.
But regarding your design for "ParForEach", I am not sure whether you really need to carry out a transformation step for each Block instance, in which case you can keep the transformation step before the "ParForEach" block.
Rgds
R Chandrasekhar (RC) -
what is the best way to handle errors in BizTalk ?
We are using web services, databases.
Is ESB Exception handling preferred to others ? any better suggestions please ?
MBHYou don't need custom-Itineraries /On Ramp/Off Ramp for repaid and resubmit using ESB portal. But you need to have receive ports, send ports, orchestration which comes with ESB tool kit for this purpose. When a failure is published to ESB-bus,
"catch all” exception send port will pick it up and publish it to the ESB Exceptiondb. Then using the ESB portal you can edit/repair the message and resubmit it directly from the portal without using the ESB-Toolkit artefacts like Itineraries /On Ramp/Off
Ramp.
Refer this article where author uses this feature without any custom ESB-toolkit artefacts
http://seroter.wordpress.com/2010/01/18/considerations-when-retrying-failed-messages-in-biztalk-or-the-esb-toolkit/
One option to route a failed message to the ESB Portal one must turn on routing for failed messages on the send port. This results in the failed message being routed to the ESB Exception database along with the exception details. Even in orchestration's
you can submit the failed message to ESBException DB from where you can repair and resubmit the message.
Refer this article for more help on this context:
Routing exceptions on send ports to the ESB Exception Management Portal without turning on routing for failed messages
If this answers your question please mark it accordingly. If this post is helpful, please vote as helpful by clicking the upward arrow mark next to my reply. -
Async Sync Bridge without BPM (Proxy-Soap-Idoc)
Hi,
I have read some blogs how to do the Async Sync Bridge without BPM for JMS adapters. I have a requirement that I am getting a Async Proxy message to PI and then PI makes Sync Soap call then the result need to send through the Idoc adapter.
Proxy - Soap- Idoc
Here Proxy is a sender so no adapter required in the Config and also Soap is java based adapter and Idoc adapter is a ABAP based so I am not sure this is possible but I just wanted to check with you.
Please let know if this is possible or not?
PI 7.1 with EHP1
Thanks,
Laxman
Edited by: Laxman Molugu on Oct 14, 2010 2:15 PMThe mapping programm can be defined as a user defined function. As sample of mine is "getGoogle()", which is doing some kind of address validation. The input parameter URL[0] contains source address. For that you need to import:
org.apache.commons.logging.*;
org.w3c.dom.*;
javax.xml.parsers.*;
org.xml.sax.SAXException;
org.apache.commons.httpclient.*;
org.apache.commons.httpclient.methods.*;
org.apache.commons.codec.*;
org.apache.log4j.*;
Example code for UDF "getGoogle()" is:
String sUrl = "http://maps.google.de/maps/api/geocode/xml?address=" + URL[0] + "&sensor=false";
HttpClient client = new HttpClient();
GetMethod method = new GetMethod(sUrl);
byte[] responseBody = null;
try {
// int statusCode = client.executeMethod(method);
// byte[] responseBody = method.getResponseBody();
// result.addValue(new String(responseBody));
String sResponse = "initial";
int statusCode = client.executeMethod(method);
responseBody = method.getResponseBody();
ByteArrayInputStream bis = new ByteArrayInputStream(responseBody);
DocumentBuilderFactory factory = DocumentBuilderFactory.newInstance();
DocumentBuilder db = factory.newDocumentBuilder();
Document doc = db.parse(bis);
doc.getDocumentElement().normalize();
NodeList nodeLst = doc.getElementsByTagName("formatted_address");
Node formAdr = nodeLst.item(0);
NodeList nlFormAdr = formAdr.getChildNodes();
sResponse = ((Node) nlFormAdr.item(0)).getNodeValue();
// Deal with the response.
result.addValue(sResponse);
} catch (Exception e) {
result.addValue(e.toString() + "######## exhrenda - googleResponse:############### URL=" + sUrl+"###########"+new String(responseBody));
} finally {
// Release the connection.
method.releaseConnection();
Maybe you are looking for
-
Mandatory fields causing validation errors
The problem is that we have a process train and the user can't enter fields that are marked as mandatory on the Entity Object until they get further down the process train. However, you cannot get past the first step (refer to this image: http://xs34
-
I am trying to set up my old iphone 3gs for my 7 year old child. Any suggestions on what i should do ? I am not tech savvy at all
-
Hi, I upload two bmp images in se78. I maintained the image name in zreport. Using select qry i fetch the name and i want to diaplay those images one of the column in my alv report. Need Source Code for this. plz assist , Thanks. Edited b
-
I can only pick up wireless in one room. I used to be able to pick it up all over the house.
I used to be able to pick up wirless all over my house. I went on vacation and when I came back, it will only pick it up in one room. My phones can pick it up all over. What can I do?
-
Wireless Network hard drive till macbook
I used to have a Wireless Network hard drive with my PC (Edmini-not good). Now, owning my new macbook I want to buy a new Wireless Network hard disk. Not only for backup but even to save Itunes musik and pictures which takes too much place on macbook