Syntax error in Transformation routine

Hi Folks,
We are In SP 17.
I have migrated standard 0bpartner_attr transfer rules to a transformation with syntax errors.
I have a routine for a gender, Valid From and Valid To its giving the following erorr.
E:Field "TRAN_STRUCTURE-VALID_FROM" is unknown. It is neither in one of
the specified tables nor defined by a "DATA" statement. "DATA"
statement.
the following is the routine code for Gender.
PROGRAM trans_routine.
      CLASS routine DEFINITION
CLASS lcl_transform DEFINITION.
  PUBLIC SECTION.
Attributs
    DATA:
      p_check_master_data_exist
            TYPE RSODSOCHECKONLY READ-ONLY,
*-    Instance for getting request runtime attributs;
    Available information: Refer to methods of
    interface 'if_rsbk_request_admintab_view'
      p_r_request
            TYPE REF TO if_rsbk_request_admintab_view READ-ONLY.
  PRIVATE SECTION.
    TYPE-POOLS: rsd, rstr.
  Rule specific types
    TYPES:
      BEGIN OF tys_SC_1,
     Field: XSEXM Male.
        XSEXM           TYPE C LENGTH 1,
     Field: XSEXF Female.
        XSEXF           TYPE C LENGTH 1,
     Field: XSEXU Unknown.
        XSEXU           TYPE C LENGTH 1,
     Field: RECORD.
        RECORD           TYPE RSARECORD,
      END   OF tys_SC_1.
    TYPES:
      BEGIN OF tys_TG_1,
     InfoObject: 0GENDER Gender.
        GENDER           TYPE /BI0/OIGENDER,
      END   OF tys_TG_1.
$$ begin of global - insert your declaration only below this line  -
... "insert your code here
$$ end of global - insert your declaration only before this line   -
    METHODS
      compute_0GENDER
        IMPORTING
          request                  type rsrequest
          datapackid               type rsdatapid
          SOURCE_FIELDS              type tys_SC_1
        EXPORTING
          RESULT                   type tys_TG_1-GENDER
          monitor                  type rstr_ty_t_monitor
        RAISING
          cx_rsrout_abort
          cx_rsrout_skip_record
          cx_rsrout_skip_val.
    METHODS
      invert_0GENDER
        IMPORTING
          i_th_fields_outbound         TYPE rstran_t_field_inv
          i_r_selset_outbound          TYPE REF TO cl_rsmds_set
          i_is_main_selection          TYPE rs_bool
          i_r_selset_outbound_complete TYPE REF TO cl_rsmds_set
          i_r_universe_inbound         TYPE REF TO cl_rsmds_universe
        CHANGING
          c_th_fields_inbound          TYPE rstran_t_field_inv
          c_r_selset_inbound           TYPE REF TO cl_rsmds_set
          c_exact                      TYPE rs_bool.
ENDCLASS.                    "routine DEFINITION
$$ begin of 2nd part global - insert your code only below this line  *
$$ end of rule type
    TYPES:
      BEGIN OF tys_TG_1_full,
     InfoObject: 0BPARTNER Business Partner.
        BPARTNER           TYPE /BI0/OIBPARTNER,
     InfoObject: 0BP_ACTITL1 First Academic Title.
        BP_ACTITL1           TYPE /BI0/OIBP_ACTITL1,
     InfoObject: 0BP_ACTITL2 Second Academic Title.
        BP_ACTITL2           TYPE /BI0/OIBP_ACTITL2,
     InfoObject: 0BP_BTHNAME BP: Person's Name at Birth.
        BP_BTHNAME           TYPE /BI0/OIBP_BTHNAME,
     InfoObject: 0BP_CAT Business Partner Category.
        BP_CAT           TYPE /BI0/OIBP_CAT,
     InfoObject: 0BP_CONS Business Partner (Consolidated/Cleansing).
        BP_CONS           TYPE /BI0/OIBP_CONS,
     InfoObject: 0BP_CONTACT BP: Contact Permission.
        BP_CONTACT           TYPE /BI0/OIBP_CONTACT,
     InfoObject: 0BP_EXTERN BP Number in External System.
        BP_EXTERN           TYPE /BI0/OIBP_EXTERN,
     InfoObject: 0BP_FSTNAME BP: Person's First Name.
        BP_FSTNAME           TYPE /BI0/OIBP_FSTNAME,
     InfoObject: 0BP_GROUP Business Partner Grouping.
        BP_GROUP           TYPE /BI0/OIBP_GROUP,
     InfoObject: 0BP_GRPNAM1 BP: Name 1 (Group).
        BP_GRPNAM1           TYPE /BI0/OIBP_GRPNAM1,
     InfoObject: 0BP_GRPNAM2 BP: Name 2 (Group).
        BP_GRPNAM2           TYPE /BI0/OIBP_GRPNAM2,
     InfoObject: 0BP_GRPTYPE BP: Group Type.
        BP_GRPTYPE           TYPE /BI0/OIBP_GRPTYPE,
     InfoObject: 0BP_LSTNAME BP: Person's Surname.
        BP_LSTNAME           TYPE /BI0/OIBP_LSTNAME,
     InfoObject: 0BP_MAR_STA BP: Marital Status.
        BP_MAR_STA           TYPE /BI0/OIBP_MAR_STA,
     InfoObject: 0BP_MDLNAME BP: Person's Middle Name or Second First
*Name.
        BP_MDLNAME           TYPE /BI0/OIBP_MDLNAME,
     InfoObject: 0BP_SECNAME BP: Person's Second Surname.
        BP_SECNAME           TYPE /BI0/OIBP_SECNAME,
     InfoObject: 0CHANGEDBY Changed by.
        CHANGEDBY           TYPE /BI0/OICHANGEDBY,
     InfoObject: 0CH_AT Time of Last Change.
        CH_AT           TYPE /BI0/OICH_AT,
     InfoObject: 0CH_ON Last changed on.
        CH_ON           TYPE /BI0/OICH_ON,
     InfoObject: 0CREATEDBY Name of person who created the object.
        CREATEDBY           TYPE /BI0/OICREATEDBY,
     InfoObject: 0CREATEDON Date on which the record was created.
        CREATEDON           TYPE /BI0/OICREATEDON,
     InfoObject: 0CREA_TIME Time Created.
        CREA_TIME           TYPE /BI0/OICREA_TIME,
     InfoObject: 0GENDER Gender.
        GENDER           TYPE /BI0/OIGENDER,
     InfoObject: 0LEGALFORM Legal Status of Organization.
        LEGALFORM           TYPE /BI0/OILEGALFORM,
     InfoObject: 0NAME_ORG1 BP: Organization Name 1.
        NAME_ORG1           TYPE /BI0/OINAME_ORG1,
     InfoObject: 0NAME_ORG2 BP: Organization Name 2.
        NAME_ORG2           TYPE /BI0/OINAME_ORG2,
     InfoObject: 0NAME_ORG3 BP: Organization Name 3.
        NAME_ORG3           TYPE /BI0/OINAME_ORG3,
     InfoObject: 0NAME_ORG4 BP: Organization Name 4.
        NAME_ORG4           TYPE /BI0/OINAME_ORG4,
     InfoObject: 0NATION Nationality.
        NATION           TYPE /BI0/OINATION,
     InfoObject: 0TITLE_SPPL Name Supplement, for example, Noble Title
        TITLE_SPPL           TYPE /BI0/OITITLE_SPPL,
     InfoObject: 0BP_TYPE Partner:Partner Type.
        BP_TYPE           TYPE /BI0/OIBP_TYPE,
     InfoObject: 0GN_PAR_SSY Source System of a Partner.
        GN_PAR_SSY           TYPE /BI0/OIGN_PAR_SSY,
     InfoObject: 0LOGSYS Source System.
        LOGSYS           TYPE RSDLOGSYS,
     InfoObject: 0RECORDMODE BW Delta Process: Record Mode.
        RECORDMODE           TYPE RODMUPDMOD,
     InfoObject: 0BP_GUID GUID of Business Partner.
        BP_GUID           TYPE /BI0/OIBP_GUID,
     InfoObject: 0BPDATEFROM GP Attributes Valid from.
        BPDATEFROM           TYPE /BI0/OIBPDATEFROM,
     InfoObject: 0BPDATETO GP Attributes Valid to.
        BPDATETO           TYPE /BI0/OIBPDATETO,
     Field: RECORD Data record number.
        RECORD           TYPE RSARECORD,
      END   OF tys_TG_1_full.
Additional declaration for transfer rule interface
  DATA:
    g_t_errorlog TYPE rssm_t_errorlog_int,
    RECORD_ALL   LIKE SY-TABIX.
global definitions from transfer rules
DATA: gs_cob_pro TYPE rsd_s_cob_pro,
      gt_viobj   TYPE rsd_t_viobj,
      gs_viobj   TYPE rsd_s_viobj.
DATA:   l_s_errorlog TYPE rssm_s_errorlog_int,
        l_text TYPE string.
FORM compute_BPDATEFROM
   CHANGING
    RESULT         TYPE tys_TG_1_full-BPDATEFROM
    RETURNCODE     LIKE sy-subrc
    ABORT          LIKE sy-subrc
  RAISING
    cx_sy_arithmetic_error
    cx_sy_conversion_error.
  INCLUDE rs_bct_bupa_form_valid_from.
ENDFORM.                    "BPDATEFROM
FORM compute_BPDATETO
   CHANGING
    RESULT         TYPE tys_TG_1_full-BPDATETO
    RETURNCODE     LIKE sy-subrc
    ABORT          LIKE sy-subrc
  RAISING
    cx_sy_arithmetic_error
    cx_sy_conversion_error.
  INCLUDE rs_bct_bupa_form_valid_to.
ENDFORM.                    "BPDATETO
FORM compute_GENDER
   CHANGING
    RESULT         TYPE tys_TG_1_full-GENDER
    RETURNCODE     LIKE sy-subrc
    ABORT          LIKE sy-subrc
  RAISING
    cx_sy_arithmetic_error
    cx_sy_conversion_error.
INCLUDE rs_bct_bupa_form_gender.
ENDFORM.                    "GENDER
FORM compute_GN_PAR_SSY
   CHANGING
    RESULT         TYPE tys_TG_1_full-GN_PAR_SSY
    RETURNCODE     LIKE sy-subrc
    ABORT          LIKE sy-subrc
  RAISING
    cx_sy_arithmetic_error
    cx_sy_conversion_error.
INCLUDE rs_bct_bupa_form_gn_par_ssy.
ENDFORM.                    "GN_PAR_SSY
$$ end of 2nd part global - insert your code only before this line   *
      CLASS routine IMPLEMENTATION
CLASS lcl_transform IMPLEMENTATION.
  METHOD compute_0GENDER.
  IMPORTING
    request     type rsrequest
    datapackid  type rsdatapid
    SOURCE_FIELDS-XSEXM TYPE C LENGTH 000001
    SOURCE_FIELDS-XSEXF TYPE C LENGTH 000001
    SOURCE_FIELDS-XSEXU TYPE C LENGTH 000001
   EXPORTING
     RESULT type tys_TG_1-GENDER
    DATA:
      MONITOR_REC    TYPE rsmonitor.
*$*$ begin of routine - insert your code only below this line        *-*
  Data:
    l_s_error_log    type rssm_s_errorlog_int,
    l_subrc          type sy-tabix,
    l_abort          type sy-tabix,
    ls_monitor       TYPE rsmonitor,
    ls_monitor_recno TYPE rsmonitors.
REFRESH:
  monitor,
  monitor_recno.
Migrated transfer rule call
  Perform compute_GENDER
    CHANGING
      RESULT
      l_subrc
      l_abort.
*-- Convert Messages in Transformation format
    LOOP AT G_T_ERRORLOG INTO l_s_error_log.
      move-CORRESPONDING l_s_error_log to MONITOR_REC.
      append monitor_rec to MONITOR.
    ENDLOOP.
    IF l_subrc <> 0.
      RAISE EXCEPTION TYPE cx_rsrout_skip_val.
    ENDIF.
    IF l_abort <> 0.
      RAISE EXCEPTION TYPE CX_RSROUT_ABORT.
    ENDIF.
$$ end of routine - insert your code only before this line         -
  ENDMETHOD.                    "compute_0GENDER
      Method invert_0GENDER
      This subroutine needs to be implemented only for direct access
      (for better performance) and for the Report/Report Interface
      (drill through).
      The inverse routine should transform a projection and
      a selection for the target to a projection and a selection
      for the source, respectively.
      If the implementation remains empty all fields are filled and
      all values are selected.
  METHOD invert_0GENDER.
$$ begin of inverse routine - insert your code only below this line-
... "insert your code here
$$ end of inverse routine - insert your code only before this line -
  ENDMETHOD.                    "invert_0GENDER
ENDCLASS.                    "routine IMPLEMENTATION
let me know how to correct the above code.
thanks

Hi,
the field tran_structure is no more available. The name changed to source_fields. Additionally there is no datapak available. It is now source_fields_table. You might need to use field symbols to access the fields.
regards
Siggi

Similar Messages

  • Undue Syntax error in transformation routine

    Hi,
    A routine is reported to be incorrect (error RSTRAN 523)  during the check of the transformation. However, a check on the source code in the editor returns no errors.
    I've implemented the oss note 980548, but I still face the problem.
    Do you have any idea of how to solve this issue ?
    Thanks in advance !
    Dieu

    Hi Dieu,
    I had a problem related to a Transfer Roule for the selection of the same filed in Start Routine and single filed routine.
    Check if you are obtaining two InfoObjects from the same field and check the corresponding routines.
    Ciao.
    Riccardo.

  • Error while transporting Transformation: Syntax error in Start Routine

    Hi Everyone,
    I'm facing a strange problem during transporting one of the Business Content cubes from Dev. to Quality.
    I'd activated the DSO 'Purchase Order Items (0PUR_O01)' and its entire data flow from the 4 datasources 2LIS_02_CGR, 2LIS_02_SCN, 2LIS_02_SGR, and 2LIS_02_ITM from BC. Then I migrated the Transfer/Update rules to transformations and the DataSources to BI7 DataSource. So far so good. The migration was successful and all the objects were activated.
    Now when I transport the same to Quality, the import fails with return code 8 and the error message says:
    'Start of the after-import method RS_TRFN_AFTER_IMPORT for object type(s) TRFN (Activation Mode)'
    'Start Routine: Syntax error in routine'
    I verified that the transformation where the error orrured was the one from InfoSource Z2LIS_02_ITM to DSO 0PUR_O01. I went and checked the start routine and it did indeed have a syntax error:
    'In PERFORM or CALL FUNCTION "ROUTINE_9998", the actual parameter SOURCE_PACKAGE" is incompatible with the formal parameter DATA_PACKAGE". '
    But when I check in the Dev. system, there is no syntax error for the same routine. Later, I tried to transport only the said transformation by re-activating it in Dev, and again I got the same error.
    I have no idea why I'm getting a syntax error in the start routine when there are non in the Dev. system. Also none of the coding is customised, it was only the BC code, migrated to a transformation.
    Any suggestions on the steps I could take to transport the transformation to my quality system?
    Thanks,
    Ram

    Hi Ajay, Shanthi, svu and Ray
    I do indeed have a start routine in my transformation and it was migrated from a 3.x update rule to a BI 7 transformation routine.
    The migration was successful and the Start Routine has NO syntax errors in the start routine in the Dev. system. I only encounter the error while transporting it to the Quality system. I cannot modify the code in the Quality system because it is non-changelable and there is no point in trying to change the code in Dev. because there are no errors over there.
    I've also made sure that I've transported all the necessary objects required by the transformations to quality. The routine does not perform a lookup, it simply deletes some records from the data package based on the processkey value (which is itself present in the data package).

  • Syntax error in Start Routine routine 9998 in transformation

    Hi Guyz,
    I am getting the below error while doinf the syntax check in start routine in one of the transformation in BW production after the failed TR movement
    E:In PERFORM or CALL FUNCTION "ROUTINE_9998", the actual parameter
    "SOURCE_PACKAGE" is incompatible with the formal parameter
    "DATA_PACKAGE".
    but for the same transformation in quality its showing  no syntax errors found.
    its an odd behaviour.
    please guide with ur expertise.
    cheerz,
    raps.

    Hi,
    Check the note 1052648. it says that:
    Start routine:
               In the start routine, all the fields from the source are always available.
    During the migration, a type '_ty_t_SC_1_full' is generated in '2nd part global'. Since Note 1325124, this type has been adjusted when the field list is changed. In the past, a change to the field list caused syntax errors of the type:
    For update rules:
                        E: For PERFORM or CALL FUNCTION "ROUTINE_9998", the actual parameter "SOURCE_PACKAGE" is not compatible with the formal parameter "DATA_PACKAGE".
    For transfer rules:
                        E:For PERFORM or CALL FUNCTION "STARTROUTINE", the actual parameter "SOURCE_PACKAGE" is not compatible with the formal parameter "DATAPAK".
               If this error continues to occur, go to the solution section to correct it.
               Solution:
               This error should now be automatically corrected with Note 1325124. Access the incorrect start routine in change mode. The type '_ty_s_SC_1_full' is then automatically adjusted to the source structure. If this does not work, you should use the tool 'RSTRAN_MIGRATION_CHECK' (described in Note 1369395) to check and possibly repair the transformation in question.
               If this error still occurs, you can correct it manually as follows:
               Copy the field list of the type     '_ty_s_SC_1' from the 'private section' of the CLASS lcl_transform DEFINITION (you can find this when you scroll up in the routine editor of the start routine) to the type '_ty_s_SC_1_full' of '2nd part global'.
    Regards,
    Anil Kumar Sharma .P

  • Syntax error in start routine

    Dear All,
    I have activated the infocube 0sd_c03 with grouping "in data flow before" and the infocube is activated with datasources
    2LIS_11_VAITM
    2LIS_11_VAHDR
    2LIS_12_VCITM
    2LIS_12_VCHDR
    2LIS_13_VDITM
    2LIS_13_VDHDR in 3.x where as
    TRCS 2LIS_13_VDITM -> CUBE 0SD_C03 in transformation with DTP.
    when I activate the transformation I get error as mentioned below:
    Start Routine: Syntax error in routine and in the start routine when I check the details of the error is
                      E:In PERFORM or CALL FUNCTION "ROUTINE_9998", the actual parameter
                               "SOURCE_PACKAGE" is incompatible with the formal parameter
                                   "DATA_PACKAGE".
    If source pakage is replaced by data package the system message is data_package is not available.
    What do I do to resolve this issue.
    KS

    hi,
    There is a structral diffrence between SOURCE_PACKAGE and DATA_PACKAGE
    so you need to change tys_SC_1_full
    go through the below links for similar problem
    Re: 0IC_C03: 2LIS_03_BF Transformation Start Routine Activation error
    Re: 2LIS_03_BF transformation problem

  • Error in Transformation Routine

    Hi all,
    I have  written a code in transformation routine. I have debugged the code. The code which I have written is working fine. The value in 'Result' is correct and till here the code executes without any error. After that , system throws an error which I cannot understand as this is the system generated code.
    I wanted to paste the error analysis here but i dont have any option to copy from there. Message class is "RSBK". Number is 299
    Any ideas?
    Regards,
    Aisha Ishrat
    ICI Pakistan Ltd.

    Hi AI,
       As I told you earlier ... jsut copy and paste the code I sent you in the end routine ... if the end routine contains your data then we are sure that the transformations have worked fine ... if it does not contain any data then we are sure something has gone wrong during the transformation.... you cannot find the problem until you are sure where it is happening.... lets work on this and get it out of our way... I am waiting for your response.
      Another point if anything has gone wrong while doing the transformations for location then the end routine will not have location info ... this is why I suggest you to put the code above in the end routine and debug ... this will give you a fair idea as to what has happened and where the problem arises.... Hope this helps.
    best regards,
    Kazmi

  • Syntax error in Update Routine

    Dear All,
    While trying to update infoobject /BIC/ZGROSSPRI in an ODS in BI through an update routine, a syntax error is thrown when I am defining a variable of type  tys_TG_1-/BIC/ZGROSSPRI.
    For instance,
    DATA: VALUE TYPE tys_TG_1-/BIC/ZGROSSPRI.
    The error is :
    E:Field "_ty_s_TG_1-/BIC/ZGROSSPRI" is unknown. It is neither in one of the
    specified tables nor defined by a "DATA" statement. "DATA" statement.
    Below given is the code which I am using for the same. Kindly advise how to correct this error.
    Moderator message - Please respect the 2,500 character maximum when posting. Post only the relevant portions of code
    Edited by: Suneeth Sebastian on Apr 7, 2010 4:11 PM
    Edited by: Rob Burbank on Apr 7, 2010 1:19 PM

    Dear All,
    While trying to update infoobject /BIC/ZGROSSPRI in an ODS in BI through an update routine, a syntax error is thrown when I am trying to define a variable of type tys_TG_1-/BIC/ZGROSSPRI. How is it possible to define a variable of type target field(Infoobject) ?
    For instance,
    DATA: VALUE TYPE tys_TG_1-/BIC/ZGROSSPRI.
    The error is :
    E:Field "_ty_s_TG_1-/BIC/ZGROSSPRI" is unknown. It is neither in one of the
    specified tables nor defined by a "DATA" statement. "DATA" statement.
    tys_TG_1-/BIC/ZGROSSPRI is already defined in the Class section as below
    TYPES:
          BEGIN OF tys_TG_1,
         InfoObject: ZGROSSPRI Gross Price in Statistical Currency.
            /BIC/ZGROSSPRI           TYPE /BIC/OIZGROSSPRI,
          END   OF tys_TG_1.

  • Syntax error  with Transformation

    Hi all,
    I am trying to write a routine in Transformation which reads the navigation attribute of the char Ymaterial from a ODS and fills an internal table which will then be uploaded to a char in the cube.
    The Code looks like the one below:
    $$ begin of 2nd part global - insert your code only below this line  *
    DATA: G_MATERIAL TYPE TABLE OF /BIC/PYMATERIAL.
    TABLES: /BIC/PYMATERIAL.
    $$ begin of routine - insert your code only below this line        -
    SELECT * INTO TABLE G_MATERIAL
    FROM /BIC/PYMATERIAL.
    FOR ALL ENTRIES IN SOURCE_PACKAGE
    WHERE /BIC/YMATERIAL = SOURCE_PACKAGE-/BIC/YMATERIAL.
    SORT G_MATERIAL BY /BIC/YMATERIAL.
    I am getting the following error message:
    E:The statement "FOR" is not expected. A correct similar statement is
    "FORM". statement is "FORM".
    In other words, how do I ensure that the value of the attribute which I am reading from the master data table of Ymaterial is the one that is present in the ODS. Can you give the syntax for the same.

    Hi rakesh
    I think You are right but when I removed the full stop after FROM /BIC/PYMATERIAL, I got the following error Field "SOURCE_PACKAGE" is unknown. It is neither in one of the specified tables nor defined by a "DATA" statement
    Thanks

  • Errors in transformation routine

    hello,all.
    when I checking my routine i have this type of an error:
    E:Tables with headers are no longer supported in the OO context.
    my global structure is look like this:
    type-pools: rssm.
    data: begin of custattr occurs 5000.
    include structure /BIC/ZDPERNUM. "M-view
    data: end of custattr.
    v BI 7.0
    Can anyone tell me what's wrong with it.

    Hi,
    first of all the table name will be /bic/pzdpernum for the master data table.
    The definition of a table in the OO-context is like
    data: custattr type standard table of /bic/pzdpernum.
    Additionally you need to define a workarea for that table.
    data: wa_custattr type /bic/pzdpernum.
    Now reading the table will be done with
    read table custattr into wa_custattr with key.....
    A loop at the table will be done with
    loop at custattr into wa_custattr.
    endloop.
    The fields of the structure can be accessed with
    wa_custattr-<fieldname> ....
    Append lines to the table with
    append wa_custattr to custattr.
    Hope this helps
    regards
    Siggi

  • Syntax error in Transfer routine

    Hai all,
               I am trying to write a routine for an object in the datasource trasnfer structure. I am getting a error. The code and the error as as follows.
    DATA: l_s_errorlog TYPE rssm_s_errorlog_int.
    SELECT SINGLE * FROM /BI0/PCOMP_CODE
        WHERE COMP_CODE     = TRAN_STRUCTURE-BUKRS AND
              OBJVERS       = 'A'.
      IF SY-SUBRC           = 0.
         RESULT = /BI0/PCOMP_CODE-CHRT_ACCTS.
      ENDIF.
    returncode <> 0 means skip this record
      RETURNCODE = 0.
    abort <> 0 means skip whole data package !!!
      ABORT = 0.
    The error message I am getting is
    "E:A target area must be declared either explicitly with an INTO clause or implicitly with a TABLES statement."
                The cursor is going to the line " SELECT SINGLE *.....". 
             I guess its pointing where the mistake is. It says the target must be specified. But I already specified the target.
    I appreciate any kind of help.
    Thanks a lot.

    Hi,
    You didn't provide a INTO class for the select statement.
    DATA : BEGIN OF LCL_COMPCODE.
    DATA : INCLUDE STRUCTURE /BI0/PCOMP_CODE.
    DATA : END OF LCL_COMPCODE.
    SELECT SINGLE * FROM /BI0/PCOMP_CODE
    WHERE COMP_CODE = TRAN_STRUCTURE-BUKRS AND
    OBJVERS = 'A'
    INTO LCL_COMPCODE.
    Loop at the LCL_COMPCODE to retrieve the data.
    Thank you
    Arun

  • ABAP SYNTAX ERROR IN STANDARD SAP TRANSFORMATION

    Hi experts, I am facing a problem while activating a transformation for the cube 0CCA_C11. I installed the flow in 3.5 and wen i was migrating the flow, i first migrated the update rule. At that time, the transformation is giving me " syntax error in the routine" for the infoobject 0CO_REPLINE. The eroor message is given below:
    E:The type "_TY_S_SC_1_FULL" is unknown, but there is a type with the similar name "_TY_S_TG_1_FULL". "_TY_S_TG_1_FULL".

    Hi,
    Please check routine if any for 0CO_REPLINE and also expert routine.
    Regards,
    Rema.

  • Syntax error  while executing Key Figure routine

    Hello,
    I am posting my question again, as I have not got any solution. Please help it will be really appreciated. Here's the description
    I am loading data from flatfile to an Infocube with 3 keyfigures: Sales Price , Sales Quantity, Sales Revune. Getting values for Sales Price and Salea Quantity  from flatfile and calculating for Sales Revunue IO_VB_REV using routine
    - I created Transformations, and under Rule Group: Standard Group box I have not mapped IO_VB_REV  any datasource field and see 'X' sign against the field.
    - In rules detail screen, I add two source fields of Rule , IO_VB_QU and IO_VB_PRC. I see IO_VB_REV already added under 'Target fields of Rule' section
    - I then add the only following line to routine
    RESULT = SOURCE_FIELDS_RULE-/BIC/IO_VB_QU * SOURCE_FIELDS_RULE-/BIC/IO_VB_PRC .
    - Clicking on check button it gives no syntax error message. I save and exit back to Rule Details page.
    - For IO_VB_REV field If I select any of 2 options i.e. Fixed Unit or No conversion it gives me a dump. So I select 'from conversion' option. In that case I enter USD against 'Conversion Type' field. It gives me information box popup with 'Incorrect Input Message'
    - When check button hit on 'Rule Details' page, it gives me error message ' Syntax error in routine '
    Why is it giving me syntax error, inspite of the fact that I get 'no syntax error' message on routine page. Also why am I getting short dumps on changing Conversion Type

    Hi Olivier,
    I really thank you for ur efforts in helping me solving this problem. Below is complete description of KF defined,
    1. Created InfoObjects for Sales Quantity, Sales Price, Sales Revunue
    Definition of <b>Sales Quantity</b>
    Name: IO_VB_QU
    Type/Data Type : Quantity
    Data Type: QUAN - Quantity field, points to unit field with format UN
    Currency / unit of measure
    Unit / Currency: 0UNIT
    Definition of <b>Sales Price</b>
    Name: IO_VB_PRC
    Type/Data Type : Amount
    Data Type: CURR - Currency field, stored as DEC
    Currency / unit of measure
    Fixed Currency: USD
    Definition of <b>Sales Revunue</b>
    Name: IO_VB_REV
    Type/Data Type : Amount
    Data Type: CURR - Currency field, stored as DEC
    Currency / unit of measure
    Fixed Currency: USD
    2. As the data is being read from flatfile, created DataSource with fields for Sales ID, Sales Price, Sales Quantity. As I am reading unit for quantity from file (has values EA,BOX,CSE), I have a corresponding field UNIT in DataSource. No field for Sales Revunue.
    3. I use 'Create Transformation' functionality to automatically create transformations.
    4. Rule Details page of each of 3 KFs has following values
    <b>Rule Details page of Sales Quantity</b>
    Rule Type: Direct Assignment
    Aggregation : Summation
    Target Unit: 0UNIT
    Unit: from Source
    Source Unit: UNIT
    Source Fields of Rule: /BIC/IO_VB_QU, UNIT
    Target Fields of Rule: 0UNIT, IO_VB_QU
    <b>Rule Details page of Sales Price</b>
    Rule Type: Direct Assignment
    Aggregation : Maximum
    Fixed Target Currency : USD
    Currency: No Conversion
    Source Fields of Rule: /BIC/IO_VB_PRC
    Target Fields of Rule:  IO_VB_PRC
    <b>Rule Details page of Sales Revunue</b>
    Rule Type: Routine   
    Aggregation : Summation
    Fixed Target Currency : USD
    Currency: from Conversion
    Conversion Type: ??????.....(I entered USD it gives me Incorrect Input message)
    Source Fields of Rule: /BIC/IO_VB_PRC, /BIC/IO_VB_QU, UNIT
    Target Fields of Rule:  IO_VB_REV
    I have this line is the routine 
    RESULT = SOURCE_FIELDS_RULE-/BIC/IO_VB_QU *   SOURCE_FIELDS_RULE-/BIC/IO_VB_PRC.
    Let me know if u need any other info......
    I really appreciate u trying  to help me
    Vidya

  • Syntax error during transport on valid transfer routines

    Dear All,
    We have some routines in a tranfer structure that are valid and working just fine in DEV.  But when we transport them to QA we get the following error message :-
    Start of the after-import method for object type R3TR ISTS (Activation Mode)                
    Transfer structure 6DB_V_BW_EPISODE_AD activated under the name 6DB_V_BW_EPISODE_AD         
    It is not necessary to copy dependent objects for transfer structure 6DB_V_BW_EPISODE_AD    
    Syntax error in transfer routine for InfoObject OPEN_DAT                                    
    Activating Transfer Rules 6DB_V_BW_EPISODE_AD ...                                           
    47 Transfer Rule(s) of the transfer structure 6DB_V_BW_EPISODE_AD removed from control table
    53 InfoObject(s) of the transfer structure 6DB_V_BW_EPISODE_AD removed from control table   
    Formulas have been saved                                                                    
    Syntax error in transfer routine for InfoObject OPEN_DAT
    If we remove all the routines the activation works just fine even though our routines are valid and working just fine in DEV.
    Can anyone explain this as this is becoming quite urgent now ?
    Thanks in advance.
    Craig

    Hi Oliver
    I work with Craig. In response to your question, what he means is that all objects independantly have been transported ok, apart from the transfer rules. If you look at the table RSTSRULES you will see a column called CONVROUT_L.
    In our Dev system this field contains the BW generated rule code. Eg.
    45GEGC5I66GA9Z5G4KFDDRIK4 against the Transfer structure. When the after import process runs, it uses the contents of this table together with the contents of the RSAABAP table which contains the code and creates the transfer rule program.
    In RSAABAP we have the following code for CODEID '45GEGC5I66GA9Z5G4KFDDRIK4'
    DATA: l_s_errorlog TYPE rssm_s_errorlog_int.
    CHECK NOT &TS&-opened_date IS INITIAL.
    IF &TS&-opened_date < '19000101'.
    &RS& = '19900101'.
    ELSEIF &TS&-opened_date > '29990101'.
    &RS& = '19900101'.
    ELSE.
    &RS& = &TS&-opened_date.
    ENDIF.
    returncode <> 0 means skip this record
    &RE& = 0.
    abort <> 0 means skip whole data package !!!
    &AB& = 0.
    In our QA system the column is blank because of the wierd Syntax problem when generating the program, therefore the transfer rules dont get activated.
    As you can see there is no problem with the ABAP.
    Regards
    Mark

  • Start Routine: Syntax error in routine 2LIS_03_BF Transformations

    Hi experts,
    I enhanced the 2lis_03_bf data source, and replicated the data source in bw system, i have mapped the transformations and when i try to activate the transformations it is giving the below error.
    Start Routine: Syntax error in routine
    when i check the start routine it is giving the  below error message.
    E:In PERFORM or CALL FUNCTION "ROUTINE_9998", the actual parameter
    "SOURCE_PACKAGE" is incompatible with the formal parameter
    "DATA_PACKAGE".
    please provide me the solution.
    Regards
    venuscm

    Hi Venu,
    This seems to me like you have earlier migrated the update rules to transformations. We did the same earlier and faced issues whenever we add new fields/infoobjects. The error message was different, if i remember correctly.
    We had to add the new field/infoobject added, to the structure '_ty_s_*****' that exists at the top of the start routine code. This was one disadvantage of migration of rules.

  • Syntax Error in Routine while Activating Transformation

    Dear All,
    I am activating whole scenario for 0SD_C03. we have made transformation for 2lis_11_vaitm, during installation we get below errors:
    - Rule (target: 0SUBTOT_1S, group: 01 Standard Group): Syntax error in routine
    -Rule (target: 0NET_VAL_S, group: 01 Standard Group): Syntax error in routine
    -Rule (target: 0PROD_CATEG, group: 01 Standard Group): Syntax error in routine
    I really appreciate your any input for this.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Darshan

    Hi,
    I hope there is inbalance in between SOURCE Datapackage and Target Datapackage. So in the start routines pls check it and it not found then add in DATA_PACKAGE...
    Check with ABAPer
    under ,
    TYPES:
          BEGIN OF tys_TG_1_full,
            SUBTOT_1S           TYPE /BI0/OISUBTOT_1S,
    and also you can fin dsimilar kind of threads in SDN.
    Re: Syntax Error in Routine while Activating Transformation
    Re: Issue while creating Transformation from Update rule.
    Re: 0IC_C03 activation of Transformation rule ends with ERROR
    Re: Error in activation of transformation
    Thanks
    Reddy

Maybe you are looking for