Table DFKKQSR not being populated for 1099 withholding tax reporting

we had to run a catch up program to populate this table in order to run program rfidyywt to generate 1099 forms. am wondering what config might be missing that would allow this table to be populated automatically as relevant transactions occur? ie: payments to business partners that are 1099able...
thanks,
Kashmir

I wouldn't mind it being closed if it weren't related to FICA public sector, but the table DFKKQSR is not an FI table, its a table in contract accounting... FI folks won't know the answer to this... I don't believe. its something someone working on FICA would have encountered..

Similar Messages

File creation for Generic Withholding Tax Reporting : amounts are zero

Hi,
I try to use the program RFIDYYWT to create the file for witholding tax reporting for France
The format tree DMEE IDWTFILE_FR_DAS2.
I have succeeded to create a file, with the correct format/layout (so a 10, 20, 210, 30, and 31 structure), but the amounts are all equal to zero in the fle generated compared to the result on the screen after execution of the program.
Does anybody knows the solution for this problem ?
Thanks a lot.

Hi Wayne,
We opened a note with SAP and were told that a US 1042s copy could not be used within the standard system. Looking into it further we found that the form name was coded into a selection program. We had an ABAP developer add code that allows us to use a "Z_" copy form.
Regards,
Gregg

USA-WITHHOLDING TAX REPORT FOR 1099-

Hai All,
I want to know the printing form name of USA-WITHHOLDING TAX REPORT FOR 1099-MISC.
Pls help.
Regards,
Sneha

Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
I am using transaction S_PL0_09000314 for USA-WITHHOLDING TAX REPORT FOR 1099 which has a selection screen.
In that selection screen ,output control header i need to provide form name.As the form name is dynamically assigned inside the program and get executed i want to explicitly provide form name in selection screen.
Pls provide me the latest form name if you are aware of it. Presently i am providing f_1099_taxformn but nothing is getting diplayed.
Regards,
Sneha.

PQH TABLES NOT BEING POPULATED BY EMPLOYEE SELF SERVICE

For reporting purposes I need to create different reports listing all the transactions that are coming from Employee Self S
ervice. As workforce tables are purged (i.g. wf_items) I need to create it using
the pqh tables (i.g. pqh_ss_transaction_history) but unfortunately they are not
being populated. Is there any audit configuration in order to save ESS transact
ions in the PQH schema? Or are there any other tables where these transactions a
re always saved?
Thank you
Facundo

I think the PQH History tables are only populated when there have been approvals.
To report on the SSHR transactions, you ay need to increase the time limit before they are purged and extract them to another table(s) fro reporting.
Regards
Tim

Data is not being populated in screen field PSPNR after F4 search help.

Hi expert,
I have added one field GW_SELECT-PSPNR in existing screen 100, and there are many fields already existing.
and there are POV for 4 fielda and i added POV for field GW_SELECT-PSPNR.
PROCESS ON VALUE-REQUEST.
FIELD gw_select-kostl MODULE determine_kostl.
FIELD gw_select-aufnr MODULE determine_aufnr.
FIELD gw_select-matnr MODULE determine_matnr.
FIELD gw_select-bwart MODULE determine_bwart.
***Added by me
FIELD gw_select-pspnr MODULE determine_pspnr.
****end add
now problem is that the value is not being populated in screen.
values are coming in field GW_SELECT-PSPNR but in screen its not being populated.
i tried function module 'DYNP_VALUES_UPDATE' then also its not being populated
now this module MODULE determine_pspnr has code inside
MODULE DETERMINE_PSPNR INPUT.
   DATA:w_dynpfields TYPE dynpread,
     i_dynpfields LIKE STANDARD TABLE OF dynpread.
PERFORM fill_pspnr.
CALL FUNCTION 'F4IF_INT_TABLE_VALUE_REQUEST'
    EXPORTING
      retfield        = 'PSPNR'
      value_org       = 'S'
    TABLES
      value_tab       = gt_pspnr
     field_tab       = lt_field_tab
      return_tab      = lt_return_tab
    EXCEPTIONS
      parameter_error = 1
      no_values_found = 2
      OTHERS          = 3.
LOOP AT lt_return_tab INTO ls_return_tab.
    gw_select-pspnr = ls_return_tab-fieldval(12).
    CALL FUNCTION 'CONVERSION_EXIT_ALPHA_INPUT'
      EXPORTING
        input = gw_select-pspnr
      IMPORTING
        output = gw_select-pspnr.
    EXIT.
ENDLOOP.
refresh i_dynpfields.
   w_dynpfields-FIELDNAME = 'gw_select-pspnr'.
   w_dynpfields-FIELDVALUE = gw_select-pspnr.
   APPEND w_dynpfields to i_dynpfields.
   APPEND gw_select to gt_select.
CALL FUNCTION 'DYNP_VALUES_UPDATE'
    EXPORTING
      DYNAME                     = sy-repid
      DYNUMB                     = sy-dynnr
    TABLES
      DYNPFIELDS                 = i_dynpfields
   EXCEPTIONS
     INVALID_ABAPWORKAREA       = 1
     INVALID_DYNPROFIELD        = 2
     INVALID_DYNPRONAME         = 3
     INVALID_DYNPRONUMMER       = 4
     INVALID_REQUEST            = 5
     NO_FIELDDESCRIPTION        = 6
     UNDEFIND_ERROR             = 7
     OTHERS                     = 8
ENDMODULE.                 " DETERMINE_PSPNR INPUT

Hi
Use this code instead of your function call:
    CALL FUNCTION 'F4IF_INT_TABLE_VALUE_REQUEST'
      EXPORTING
        retfield        = 'FEE_NUMBER'
        dynpprog        = sy-cprog
        dynpnr          = sy-dynnr
        dynprofield     = 'FEE' ================>your field
        value_org       = 'S'
      TABLES
        value_tab       = it_fee
      EXCEPTIONS
        parameter_error = 1
        no_values_found = 2
        OTHERS          = 3.
Best Regards
Yossi

Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax

Hi Gurus,
Would you please help me with the message below:
Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax
In my company payment orders are created in F110 for accounts payable, as we use another ERP system (Baan) to perform the local accounts payments, and now I've just activated Extended withholding tax functionality With accumulation (necessary in Brazil) but I get this error.
Is it not possible to user payment order with extended withholding tax + accumulation? I find it hard to believe...
I've tried to unflag the payment order only for the payment method I'm using in FBZP t.code, but then no payment order were created but instead a payment document were posted with the withholding tax accumulation, but this is not the way we are working, and nothing is sent to Baan
any help is welcome !
TREAD LOCKED SINCE IT IS DUPLICATED FROM THREAD payment order are not defined for extended withholding tax

Hi,
On the analysis, the system expects an entry in the T059Q table with
code as XX.
The reason being in the extended withholding tax we use multiple
witholding tax codes and these entries are stored in the table
with_item. And in BSEG we populate the field withholding tax code i.e.
BSEG-QSSKZ with the value 'XX'. In classical withholding tax we used to
store the code directly which is not possible with Extended withholding
tax.
As the field BSEG-QSSKZ refers to the values in the table T059Q-QSSKZ
the entry 'XX" needed in this table for the corresponding country of the
company code to maintain the correct relationship and consistent
database information.
Hence for the statistical purpose and for the internal calculations we
need an entry in the table T059Q. Could you please maintain this code
i.e. 'XX' also in the table T059Q in a test system? Then retest your issue.
This should resolve your issue.
Kind Regards,
Vanessa.

Seam (EJB3/JSF) App Deploys - but tables are not created, populated

Please let me know if you've run across this or have an inkling of an idea of what is going on here.
Description: I have created the JDBC Data Source and this deploys successfully. The JNDI Name for this data source is: "seam-jee5-ds".
I am using this JDNI name as the data source in my persistence.xml for the application. This data source is found when the application deploys. The data source itself is an embedded HSQLDB database, but I have also tried this with H2 and the result is the same.
The application works, I can open the page...but anytime there is a transaction with the database, the transaction fails. The error is that it can't find the table to query from, and fails w/ this exception:
javax.el.ELException: javax.ejb.EJBTransactionRolledbackException: EJB Exception: ; nested exception is: javax.persistence.PersistenceException: org.h
ibernate.exception.SQLGrammarException: could not execute query; nested exception is: javax.persistence.PersistenceException: org.hibernate.exception.
SQLGrammarException: could not execute query
+Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: Table not found in statement [select user0_.username as username2_, user0_.name as name2_, user0_.password as passwo+
+rd2_ from Customer user0_ where user0_.username=? and user0_.password=?]+
at org.hsqldb.jdbc.Util.throwError(Unknown Source)
The EJBs are recognized/discovered; example:
Aug 15, 2009 7:35:29 PM org.hibernate.cfg.annotations.EntityBinder bindTable
INFO: Bind entity org.jboss.seam.example.booking.Booking on table Booking
The persistence unit is configured:
Aug 15, 2009 7:35:29 PM org.hibernate.ejb.Ejb3Configuration configure
+INFO: Processing PersistenceUnitInfo [+
name: bookingDatabase
+...]+
Problem: When I then check the database (HSQLDB or H2), none of the tables that should be created and populated as a result of the EJBs are there.
The only two issues/warnings that I see are:
Aug 15, 2009 7:35:29 PM org.hibernate.impl.SessionFactoryObjectFactory addInstance
INFO: Not binding factory to JNDI, no JNDI name configured+
Aug 15, 2009 7:35:29 PM org.hibernate.util.NamingHelper getInitialContext+
INFO: JNDI InitialContext properties:{}+
Aug 15, 2009 7:35:32 PM com.sun.faces.config.ConfigureListener contextInitialized
INFO: Initializing Sun's JavaServer Faces implementation (1.2_03-b04-FCS) for context '/seam-jee5-booking'
Aug 15, 2009 7:35:34 PM org.jboss.seam.servlet.SeamListener contextInitialized
INFO: Welcome to Seam 2.1.2
Aug 15, 2009 7:35:34 PM org.jboss.seam.util.Resources getRealFile
WARNING: Unable to determine real path from servlet context for "/WEB-INF/classes" path does not exist.
Aug 15, 2009 7:35:34 PM org.jboss.seam.util.Resources getRealFile
WARNING: Unable to determine real path from servlet context for "/WEB-INF/dev" path does not exist.
Stack: JDK 1.6_011; WebLogic 10.3.1 (11g); Seam 2.1.2; Windows XP; HSQLDB 1.8
Any help you can provide would be much appreciated.
The app's persistence.xml:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<persistence xmlns="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xsi:schemaLocation="http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence http://java.sun.com/xml/ns/persistence/persistence_1_0.xsd"
version="1.0">
<persistence-unit name="bookingDatabase">
<provider>org.hibernate.ejb.HibernatePersistence</provider>
<jta-data-source>seam-jee5-ds</jta-data-source>
<properties>
     
     <property name="hibernate.dialect" value="org.hibernate.dialect.HSQLDialect"/>
     <property name="hibernate.transaction.manager_lookup_class"
          value="org.hibernate.transaction.WeblogicTransactionManagerLookup"/>
</properties>
</persistence-unit>
</persistence>
Edited by: user447661 on Aug 17, 2009 9:41 AM
Edited by: user447661 on Aug 17, 2009 9:45 AM
Edited by: user447661 on Aug 17, 2009 9:47 AM

Nevermind, the issue was that my persistence.xml did not contain the following property:
<property name="hibernate.hbm2ddl.auto" value="create-drop"/>
Therefore, the tables were not being created upon deployment.
Still, I would expect to see entity beans listed in the WebLogic console.

Data object is not being populated in BAM

We are putting the data in JMS Queue. We have created an EMS in BAM. It is picking the data from JMS Queue, but the data object is not being populated. The request we are using here is given below:
Request:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<Test xmlns="http://education.com/OrderImport">
<OrderLineReferenceNumber>abcad</OrderLineReferenceNumber>
<WebOrderNumber>cccccg</WebOrderNumber>
<OrderLineCount>gn</OrderLineCount>
<LineNumber>4</LineNumber>
<ISBN10>46564574</ISBN10>
<ISBM13>6767</ISBM13>
<ID>67</ID>
<Status>78768</Status>
</Test>
Does anybody has any idea on that?
Regards,
Chandrachur.

Hi Arun,
Thanks for your prompt reply.
We are not using any trasfomation here. We have created thje Data objects as per the message type in the request.
Please find the dataobjects details we are using:
Field name Field ID Field type Max length Scale Nullable Public Lookup Calculated Tip Text
OrderLineReferenceNumber _OrderLineReferenceNumber string                                    100               -               No             Yes                   -                          -               -
WebOrderNumber _WebOrderNumber              string                                    100               -               Yes            Yes                   -                          -               -
OrderLineCount _OrderLineCount                 integer                                     -                 -               Yes            Yes                   -                          -               -
LineNumber _LineNumber                      integer                                     -                 -               Yes            Yes                   -                          -               -
ISBN10 _ISBN10                              string                                    100              -                Yes            Yes                  -                           -               -
ISBM13 _ISBM13                             string                                    100              -                Yes            Yes                  -                           -               -
ID _ID                                    string                                    100              -                Yes            Yes                  -                           -               -
Status _Status                              string                                    100              -                Yes            Yes                  -                           -               -
Thanks again,
Chandrachur.

Payment order are not defined for extended withholding tax

Hi Gurus,
Would you please help me with the message below. It appears on F110 when I try to pay a vendor open item with extended withholding tax:
Message FZ626 -Payment orders are not defined for extended withholding tax
In my company payment orders are created in F110 for accounts payable, as we use another ERP system (Baan) to perform the local accounts payments, and now I've just activated Extended withholding tax functionality With accumulation (necessary in Brazil) but I get this error.
Is it not possible to user payment order with extended withholding tax + accumulation? I find it hard to believe...
I've tried to unflag the payment order only for the payment method I'm using in FBZP t.code, but then no payment order were created but instead a payment document were posted with the withholding tax accumulation, but this is not the way we are working, and nothing is sent to Baan
any help is welcome

The payment method "Y" the option "payment order only" was marked?
For a withholding tax type with accumulation in a company code with extended withholding tax payment
methods that create only payment orders can´t be used. Payment orders can only be created only if there are
no tax types with accumulation involved in the paid items of the payment run.
The functionality extended withholding tax works fine for Brazil
however, you can´t use the payment order with this functionality.
Please, review your customizing for payment method 'Y" in transaction
FBZP.
Best regards,
Leonardo Vedovelli
FI Support Engineer
SAP Active Global Support

Suppliers which are active and not being involved for a long time

Hi All,
Is there any way we can find suppliers which are active but not being used for a long time (for a specific duration) . i.e being involved in no open POs or no invoices processed or no payments made.
Please advice.
Thanks

Hi Abhi,
I have created some queries for the same. COuld you help me if I am going in the rite direction.
I have created a query to find the suppliers which are not being used in the POs for the past one year by using the below query: But for invoices and payments to be included, I am finding it a bit difficult....need help..............
--FINAL QUERY
SELECT vendor_id, vendor_name, creation_date, last_update_date
FROM po_vendors v
WHERE v.end_date_active IS NULL
AND v.enabled_flag = 'Y'
AND NOT EXISTS (
SELECT 1
FROM po_headers_all h
WHERE h.vendor_id = v.vendor_id
AND h.creation_date(+) BETWEEN (SYSDATE - 365) AND (SYSDATE))
ORDER BY vendor_id DESC
Is it possible to send me the program so that it would be helpful for me to use it.
email: [email protected]
Help Greatly appreciated.
Thanks
Aman

HT1807 I am out of the country. I turned my cellular data off and connected to wiFi . However, it is still showing that i am connected to a network. How dan i be sure that i am not being charged for roaming?network , I am still showing a network

I am out of the country. I turned my cellular data off and connected to wiFi . However, it is still showing that i am connected to a network. How can i be sure that i am not being charged for roaming?

Make sure data roaming and cellular data is turned off. If you don't want to receive calls or SMS then put your phone in airplane mode and reactivate WiFi

Fairly new battery not charging after not being used for a while

My computer (Elitebook 2530p) has not been used for a while, perhaps a month or two. The battery used to hold for over 3 hours of light use.
Now, the battery won't charge with the message "0% available (plugged in, not charging)"
I can't find a battery refresh utility in the BIOS, or any way to interact with the battery. Is there something I'm missing? Should the battery just go dead after not being used for a while?
Update: fixed typo

I've run the HP battery check and got the code REOOW. Battery is dead, and I am out of warranty. I can't think of any possible reason why this should have happened.
What does this code (REOOW) mean?

Notifications are not being generated for any emails that have rules applied to them.

Notifications are not being generated for any emails that have rules applied to them. Any clues how to fix this?

In System Center 2012 Operations Manager, the alert notification will be sent when the alert first meets all criteria, regardless of resolution state, unless resolution state itself is a criterion. If alert suppression is enabled for the rule or monitor
that raises an alert, only one notification will be sent when the subscription criteria are first met. No additional notifications will be sent until the alert is closed and a new alert is raised that meets all subscription criteria. PLease check
1) whether your rule has trun on alert supression
2) Close the alert, craised by rule, and do it again
Roger

Agreements Not Being Picked For SFTP Protocol in Oracle 11G

Hi Anuj ,
PFB the Details of the Issue :
Agreements are not being picked for SFTP protocol even though From TP , To TP , Document Type and Revision are picked correctly .
We are running on MLR11 , Version : 11.1.1.4.0 . Also we have set b2b.useCPAid to false in EM Properties so that Agreement is picked based on DocType Name , Revision and Partner Id's .
Also when we used File Protocol its working Fine . The problem exists for SFTP Protocol .
Error Code : B2B-50547
Error Description Machine Info: (gwl09072appg084) Description: Agreement not found for trading partners: FromTP TestEbxml, ToTP BTGS with document type rqRequestServiceRequest-1.0-INBOUND.
Patch Level : 14114625
Regards,
Rohith

Hi Anuj ,
Thanks for the reply .
Yes we are setting the Filename Format explicitly in the LC . As far as we have understood , naming convention FromTP_MSGID.xml
is used to identify the TP and also MSGID is used to avoid duplicates and identification xpath is set to identify the Action .
When we are using %FROM_PARTY%_%TO_PARTY%_%DOCTYPE_NAME%_%DOCTYPE_REVISION%_%TIMESTAMP%.xml , All parameters are identified as expected and Agreements are also being picked when we are using File Protocol . Only when we are trying with SFTP Prtocol , even though all values are being picked correctly , only agreement is not being picked . Could you please help ?
Regards,
Rohith

[svn:osmf:] 14928: Fix bug FM-468: Initial and max indices not being respected for RTMP MBR.

Revision: 14928
Revision: 14928
Author:   [email protected]
Date:     2010-03-22 17:35:43 -0700 (Mon, 22 Mar 2010)
Log Message:
Fix bug FM-468: Initial and max indices not being respected for RTMP MBR.
Ticket Links:
    http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FM-468
Modified Paths:
    osmf/trunk/framework/OSMF/org/osmf/net/NetStreamSwitchManager.as
    osmf/trunk/framework/OSMFTest/org/osmf/net/TestNetStreamSwitchManager.as

Table DFKKQSR not being populated for 1099 withholding tax reporting

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for