Table of content level limit

how can I display more than 3 level in a TOC webpart?
can I just modify the xsl to achieve this?

Hi,
try the below link
http://sharepoint.stackexchange.com/questions/20952/add-more-levels-to-the-table-of-contents-web-part
Thanks, Sures | MCTS SharePoint

Similar Messages

Table Of Contents - Level Formatting

InDesign CS3
Ive created a long document that catalogs all of my company's graphic options for our motorcycles.
Each page contains 2 graphics along with their respective part number and graphic name. The part number and graphic name for each graphic are set in 2 separate text boxes and setup as 2 different paragraph styles.
Im trying to create a Table Of Contents that lists, by section, the part number, graphic name and page number for every graphic. Currently my TOC looks like this:
Section
Part Number
Graphic Name5
However, I would like for it to look like this:
Section
Part Number Graphic Name5
I don't see an option to keep TOC Levels on the same line...
Any suggestions?
Thank you,
Desi

You can run on entries, but it runs on all entries. You'll just have to do a search and replace.

Problem with automatic table of contents Level headings

I am having trouble with the Table of contents in Adobe Indesign. When I create my automatic table of contents one of the Level headings that is supposed to appear under Chapter 1 instead appears under the Introduction heading. On the actual page where the heading paragraph styles have been defined the 2nd Level heading is as it should be underneath Chapter 1. So what I end up having to do is move them manually in the TOC. But I don’t want to have to do this and it would be great if Indesign instead did the automatic table of contents correctly.
I wonder if it has anything to with the fact that our template is set up with headings (that sit outside the body text to the left) as text boxes which we place inside the main body text box (they have anchored object settings on them so the heading sits off to the side). Whilst the anchored text box is exactly in the right sequence, maybe indesign senses and reads the anchored text box last?
I have an example of the file and the problem that is occurring in the pdf, it can be downloaded from:
Is there a solution to this? If anyone has any ideas I would be very grateful.

I've been playing with this for a while, and quite honestly I don't understand why it's doing things the way it is. It's working correctly on Page 11, which seems to me to have exactly the same structure, except for the subtitle. It also works correctly if I copy the frames from page 14 and paste into a new doc.
Things I tried that did not work: Export as .inx and move the pages to a new doc. You might try copying the text and pasting into a new doc.

2 Fact Tables with a same content level

Hi,
I have 2 fact tables F1,F2 joined to the same 4 dimensions D1,D2,D3,D4.The detail level # of elements multiplied for all the dimensions D1,D2,D3,D4 are the same for both dimension.I even set the content level for the 2 fact tables and the content filter is the same in both fact tables F1.Column1=0 in F1 fact table and F2.Column1=0 in F2 fact table.So how does OBIEE decide which fact table to select in this scenario.
I went through the below blog but could not get much information
http://obiee-blog.info/administration-tool/what-rule-is-followed-when-several-fact-are-at-the-same-content-level/
I appreciate if anyone can guide me with the right answers.

How many records retrieving when joining F1 & F2 with dimension ? if the f1 and d1 has 200 records and f2 and d1 is retriving 100 records it chooses shortest path.
thanks,
Saichand

Make table of contents links keep current zoom level, not zoom out to full page

When Indesign creates tables of contents, they automatically link to the paragraphs the links point to, so that in an interactive PDF, clicks and prods take the user to that page. Great.
What's not so great is, that the hyperlinks / cross-references / jump-links / whatever that are created behind the scenes within the table of contents appear to:
...be automatically set to reset the zoom to full page width
...not be editable in any way
Normal cross references retain the zoom level that the user has chosen, and normal hyperlinks that point to a page in the document have a range of settings about what zoom level change (if any) should be imposed on the user, which can be set to 'inherit zoom'.
How do I set up a table of contents that doesn't annoy users by resetting their chosen zoom level to an artitrary default when they use the interactive table of contents?
I'm really hoping I don't have to ditch Indesign's table of contents feature and create every cross reference manually.

(editted) So it turns out that you can 'expand' a table of contents by copying and pasting it - this fills the hyperlinks panel with links that can be editted (like above) but breaks the auto-update - they're no longer a TOC, they're just a text frame full of links. (I had got different copies mixed up when I thought the frame holding the editable links was also auto-updating)
The greying out of the links was a red herring, just something to do with the fact they were on a master page.
It does mean that one possible TOC workflow is:
Create a TOC on the pasteboard somewhere.
Before finalising the document, update this TOC and alt-drag the 'live' TOC creating an editable 'dead' copy in an appropriate place in the document
Edit the link properties of the links in the 'dead' copy (don't forget that you can select multiple hyperlinks at once by holding down shift, and edit things like the Zoom Setting all at once with Hyperlink Options in the Hyperlinks flyout menu. )
Then, if you make other changes to the document later on, delete the dead copy, update and re-copy the live original, and re-do the changes to the new copy
This isn't a bad method - it just adds about a minute's work each time you export a PDF (delete, update TOC, alt-drag, shift-select the new batch of .XXXX links at the bottom of the Hyperlinks panel, > Hyperlink Options, Zoom Setting > Inherit Zoom, done).
Alternatively, you could manually build a TOC using cross-references if you want links to the exact position on the page, not just the top of the appropriate page.

Error in content level mapping

Hi Gurus,
I designed star schema in that when as a standard practice (for making report performance faster) . I searched threads in forum and everything as defined i have done still I am getting errors.
1) I am setting content level agg. of fact for their based dimension then I am getting error in consistency check as
'[39008] Logical dimension table Dim_xyz has a source Dim_xyz that does not join to any fact source.'
, what i should do more for this ?
2) If i define content level mapping in dimensions for its same column like date for time dimension then i get error message as
'[nQSError: 14031] The content filter of a source for logical table: Dim_xyz references multiple dimensions.'
3) Also as we know fact table contains only measures and foreign keys of dimensions so why do i get error in consistency check as '[89001] The Physical Table '"Fact_xyz"' has no keys defined.'
I am fed of these stupid errors as why does not obi server understand that this is fact table. When I saw prebuilt rpd i did not find these types of error there.
Thanks for your instant reply,
Amol

Hi,
The scenario I am trying to test is a multi mapping scenario where I am trying to split one source message and create two target messages by using two different receiver interfaces, one for each message.
I am on PI 7.1 and when I test message mapping and operation mapping using the payload from SXMB_MONI, it is successful. Whereas when I test the scenario end to end I am getting the following error messages:
Operation Mapping
Employee_Out_SI_To_Employee1_In_SI_AND_Employee2_In_SI_OM
Name
Employee_Out_SI_To_Employee1_In_SI_AND_Employee2_In_SI_OM
Namespace
http://accenture.com/1:N_multi-mapping
Runtime error
Split mapping created no messages
Start tag ns0:Messages Add raw attribute xmlns:ns0="http://sap.com/xi/XI/SplitAndMerge" Start tag ns0:Message1 Close tag ns0:Message1 Start tag ns0:Message2 Close tag ns0:Message2 Close tag ns0:Messages
Could someone please help
Cheers,
S

"Table of Contents" web part - How to have expand/collapse buttons? (I can use only CSS/JavaScript/JQuery)

Hi there,
I have a Table of Contents web part which is great. Is there a way so it shows only top level sites and then one can expand or collapse any top level site to see/hide the subsites?
As of now it shows
HR Parent site
- HR sub site 1
- HR sub site 2
IT Parent site
- IT sub site 1
- IT sub site 2
What I want is
+ HR Parent site
+ IT Parent site
So one can expand or collapse on demand.
Any relevant JS/CSS/JQuery code?
Thank you so much.

Hi,
According to your post, my understanding is that you want to expand or collapse the level site for the table of contents web part.
I have made a simple code demo below to achieve this scenario, you can refer to it.
<script src="http://code.jquery.com/jquery-1.10.2.min.js" type="text/javascript"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
$(function(){
var iconCollapse = "/_layouts/images/collapse.gif";
var iconExpand = "/_layouts/images/expand.gif";
$("div[id='WebPartWPQ2'] li ul").hide();
//ugly way
var $t = $("#WebPartWPQ2 div").children("ul").children("li").children("div");
$t.each(function(){
//console.log($(this).html());
$(this).attr("style", "float: right; margin-right: 297px; line-height: 8px;");
$(this).css("display","inline");
$("<a src=" + iconExpand + "></img>").insertBefore($(this));
$("a[class='min']").click(function()
var img = $(this).children();
//Traverse the DOM to find the child UL node
var subList = $(this).siblings().children('ul');
//Check the visibility of the item and set the image
var Visibility = subList.is(":visible")?img.attr('src',iconExpand):img.attr('src',iconCollapse);
//Toggle the UL
subList.slideToggle();
</script>
Note: Yous should change the Web part ID and the css style to fit your environment.
Thanks & Regards,
Jason
Jason Guo
TechNet Community Support

Span columns problem with Table of Contents order

Hello,
I'm having a strange issue with headings that span columns and Table of contents order. My document has a heading paragraph in a coloured box, which is then inserted in-line into a 2-column text box. The paragraph style for the box (set to in-line) is set to span all columns, so that the 2-columned text doesn't get messed up.
When I create a table of contents, the Heading style that is inside the coloured box is being picked up fine, but even though it is inserted before the headings below it, it is showing up after the level 2 headings, instead of before.
I have confirmed that the insertion of the blue bar is before the text below it, as when I remove the span columns option, the TOC works as it is supposed to. Is this a bug?

Hi there, thanks for the reply.
The only way I could move the inline box to the left was to make a custom anchor and change the X value, this did not affect the TOC unfortunately. I also checked the location of the invisible marker indicating the location of the inline text box, and it is definitely before the heading that follows. I confirmed this by removing the span columns option for that paragraph, and the TOC displayed properly after doing that, meaning there is likely some problem with the span columns option not properly recognizing the order of content.
Regards,

How to update a table of contents when the feature "update table of contents" is unavailable?

Hello folks,
I've been struggling all morning with this issue and am completely desperate.
First, some info:
- I am making a spanish versions of an english documents: everything in the original doc was then edited, including TOCs. What I got at first, was a first spanish document already filled with spanish content.
- I was not the primary creative of the document I'm workin on and am unable to get in touch with whoever that can be.
- My document is a 200 pages text only document, with 12 chapters and, at the beginning of each chapter, a specific TOC for that very chapter.
- Inside each chapter, there are only Sections and Subsections, no other style. Those are the two levels in the TOCs.
- There is also a General TOC at the beginning of the document: that one only shows the Chapter names and the page number where to locate them.
My problem:
- Somewhere along the way, from one doc to another, the TOCs stopped to update the page numbers automatically.
- Now I have sections and subsections that are shown in one page (for instance 204) but they actually are on page 135.
- When I try to update the TOCs, I stand on the TOC itself as I was told in many tutorials, but the "update table of contents" feature is unavailable, even in the main TOC at the very beginning of the doc.
It is like if I wasn't standing in the actual TOC, but there is no actual TOC anywhere that I could refer to.
What can I do? I am changing the wrong page numbers manually but, of course, that is not ideal... and it may become more and more tricky while I keep producing new documents each based on the previous one.
Any help will be much appreciated.
Warm regard from sunny Paris, France!
Sasha

You've just confused me.
My understanding of how this is set up is that either:
This is a book, and there is a master TOC that includes all book documents and a document-specific TOC in each component file, or
This is a single file and there is one master TOC that includes all sections and a section-specific TOC that includes only the individual section.
In the first case, I think you would want two TOC styles set up, one that includes the chapter heads (if I understood how you said this worked) for the for the master, and you would include all docs in the book when you generate it, and a second style for the individual chapters, with the subheadings you want to include.
In the second case, it would be similar, but instead of only one style to cover the section TOCS, I think you would need to create a unique set of pargraph styles for the headings in each section (they can all be the same format, based one section, just with unique names), and then make a TOC style for each section that includes only the styles from that section.
OK, wait a sec. I just reread what you said: "Another thing: when the numbers are "linked" and updating well, they display indide a little box. Not a text box, but a kind of little frame around the numbers. That frame makes it imposible to delete just one number: when the TOC says that Section 6.1 is in page 135, for example, you cannot delete just the 5, it deletes, not just the 3 numbers, but also the doted tab."
I think these are NOT normal TOCs created by using Layout > TOC (but you could replace them with ones that are, if you set up your styles properly and the text you want to include is appearing on the pages). Those little boxes you mention sound like cross-references, which should update automatically without any intervention at all. Unfortunately, cross-refs can be flakey, especially if they point to another document. I'd open the cross-refs panel and see if you need to recreate a bunch of links.

Accessibility Tags - What to do with Table of Contents & More

I am looking for some help and advice regarding tagging a PDF document for accessibility using Acrobat 9 Pro.
Until now, the most I've ever done with Acrobat is create the occasional straight-text document and a few simple forms. But my boss has asked me to tag a programming manual for accessibility and I'm a little lost. There are a lot of both images and code samples in this text that I have no idea how to work with because the automatic tagging seems to have gone haywire.
I downloaded the Acrobat 9 Pro Accessibility Repair Workflow document and have done the following:
Determined that my document is not a scanned document.
Determined that there are no forms or buttons in this document.
Set the language to English.
Set the document security to "no security".
Determined that the document has bookmarks.
Determined that the document is not a tagged document.
Run the Accessibility Full Check.
This is where I ran into problems--both because of the nature of the document and my own ignorance of the "making accessible" process.
My table of contents is split up into multiple areas shown as tables but the individual items in the table are irregularly identified--I have no clue how to get them to appear correctly. Any tips would be appreciated. Should the Table of Contents even be a table? I know it's called a table, but it has multiple levels and I'm just not sure what to do with it.
There are also several tables in the document. They appear mostly OK, but Acrobat seems to think that the tables are made up of individual figures and produces "No alternate text for Figure" errors on some of them.
Finally, how on earth do I do text flow on code?? The code is all text, not images.
If anyone knows anything about this whole accessibility thing I would greatly appreciate your input.
Thank you!
Jenn

It may actually be faster to save it as a DOC file. The formatting may get messed up, but fixing that may be faster than doing all of the tagging you need to do. At the end, you have a document that can easily be modified in the future and recreated in PDF form. The long-term workflow should be better. My guess you will find that setting up a style sheet in WORD (or using an existing one) will be easy to use in addressing the issues. When I think of setting a bookmark in some location, I think of the work in setting just one bookmark manually in Acrobat. I think that WORD would actually be easier if the file transfer is readonably. Worth a try anyway.

Table of Contents bookmarks not exporting to PDF (CS5)

I have a 200 page book made up of 15 documents. I've created a table of contents based on paragraph styles and the TOC generates and formats correctly. When I create the TOC, the Create PDF Bookmarks box is checked. When I export the whole book I've tried it with Create Tagged PDF checked and unchecked.
After I export to PDF from the Book palette, the TOC items are links (at least they give me the pointer-hand icon) but they don't go anywhere. The only one that does is the one in the same document as the TOC. (I have tried the TOC both within a chapter and also in it's own document with no other links in it). The behavior is the same in the Bookmarks pane - all are shown but only one works. I've looked at several of the bookmarks' Properties > Actions. It says its "Going to a page in another document" > (document-name-of-the-correct-chapter-but-with-pdf-instead-of-indd.pdf) > Page 1 (this is correct) > Zoom level: actual size.
This isn't right - it's pointing to an imaginary pdf that doesn't exist. It should be pointing to page X in the current document.
Here's what I've tried:
* restarting InDesign
* restarting my machine
* deleting the TOC and regenerating it
* generating the book with all documents open or all documents closed
* moving the TOC to its own document
* probably some other things I've forgotten in the struggle
All of the links and references in the individual documents are good.
I've looked around these forums and this seems to be an ongoing and unsolved issue for other folks using older versions. This is the closest I came to finding an answer but ended up with an Adobe employee logging it as a bug in 2009. Bookmarks not exporting from InDesign to PDF in CS4 By (c_goates)
So here's hoping there is some new information. I've been trying to get this to work for far too long and don't relish drawing bookmark boxes around all 55 of my text links.
Specs: Max OS 10.6.6, CS5 (Version 7.0)
Sorry this is so long, but details help, usually. Thanks in advance for any advice.

There are some known problems with bookmarks and CS5 as well. As far as I know, the 7.0.3 update won't fix them, but it does solve some other problems, so you should install it.

Cdparanoia 004: Unable to read table of contents header

Hi. I've been trying to rip wavs with grip but it was unable to locate any audio cd even though I could explore it from my desktop (xfce 4.10) and I am part of the optical group. Because of this, I tried running cdparanoia from the terminal.
Running the next command: cdparanoia -vsQ displays the next warning:
cdparanoia III release 10.2 (September 11, 2008)
Using cdda library version: 10.2
Using paranoia library version: 10.2
Checking /dev/cdrom for cdrom...
Testing /dev/cdrom for SCSI/MMC interface
SG_IO device: /dev/sr0
CDROM model sensed sensed: ASUS DVD-E616P3H 1.04
Checking for SCSI emulation...
Drive is ATAPI (using SG_IO host adaptor emulation)
Checking for MMC style command set...
Drive is MMC style
004: Unable to read table of contents header
Unable to open disc. Is there an audio CD in the drive?
if I try to listen a track from an external application like mplayer it won't play any audio but if I manually locate the audio and choose them an application to play, they will. Also, the hardware itself is functional since I ripped music from a debian squeeze (dvd) installation.
Finally If it's useful, I used gvfs and exec ck-launch-session dbus-launch startxfce4 in my .xinitrc to mount usb and other devices automatically
Thanks in advance

You removed all mailboxes (.mbox files) located within this problem account named folder at Home > Library > Mail and the same occurs when re-launching Mail?
The TableofContents file is a package file for a .mbox so it is hidden.
I'm not sure how you removed all mailboxes for this account but quit Mail first and using the Finder, go to Home > Library > Mail > this POP account named folder (named by the user name and incoming mail server for the account). Move the account named folder to the Desktop.
Launch Mail and if it launches successfully without locking up and quitting, a new account named folder will be created automatically by Mail within the account named folder.
All email clients have limits and the recommended size limit for a Jaguar or Panther mailbox is 1GB and for Tiger Mail, 2GB.
An "overstuffed" mailbox issue can occur at any mailbox size (which means the mailbox has some corruption and/or is over the recommended size limit) but is more likely to occur depending on the number and size of message attachments contained in a mailbox and especially as a Jaguar or Panther mailbox approaches or exceeds 1GB in size.
Since an account's Inbox mailbox is usually the most active mailbox, it is not a good idea to use an account's Inbox mailbox as the final storage location for all received messages not deleted.

Content Level

I have a fact table with 11 million rows that joins with 8 dimesion tables to form a perfect star schema.
The client said that he can reduce the row size to 6 million if we remove 3 dimensions from the joins. So he created a materialized view with 6 million rows joining with 5 dimesnions which he is going to use the most in the reports.
The client requires the previous model as well because there are 2 reports out of the 7 reports that will be based on the 11 million rows fact and the 8 dimension tables.
if I convert this scenario to the aggregate and detail level Fact. I will have 2 models (5 Dimesnion model lets say it as aggregate and 8 dimesnion model as detail). Now i will create a BMM layer subject area and promote the detailed level model to the BMM layer. For Aggregate I will start mapping each of the objects in BMM layer except for thr 3 dimension tables that are nor present in AGG model with the Agg model (5 dimesnions) of the physical layer.
While Aggregate navigation and creating dimension hierarchies we set the content level navigation for each logical table source to the level at which the lowest granularity exists. However in my scenario. The granularity for both the model will be same. So how will the query from OBIEE recognize which model to use when a report is built as both the models are built at the same content level with the exception of 3 dimsion tables.
Please help it is urgent. How should I implement this scenario?

For your "fact" table in the BMM, you should have two LTS - one for the detail level data, one for the aggregate level data.
For each of your dimension tables, you should set up a hierarchy (sorry, using standard accepted terms of objects here...not Oracle's non-standard ones....) Each dimension should have at least a "total" and "detail" level, more if there are a proper hierarchy.
Then when you set up your LTS, for the detail one - each of your eight dimensions will have content level set to the detail levels. For your aggregate LTS, on the three dimensions that aren't present, set the content level to the "total" level. I'd also set the PRIORITY GROUP so that the aggregate gets chosen first instead of the detail.
Hope this helps!
Scott

Content level setting in OBIEE 11g

Hi,
i am new to obiee 11g.i have an doubt in setting up the content level setting in BMM layer.i have given details level in fact LTS content tab with help of physical join,i dont get any error but while trying to generate reports i am getting an error "None of the fact table is compatible with the requested level".where i am commiting mistake,do i need to set content llevel based on physical join or logical join scenario.kindly help regarding this.
thanks in advance!
Edited by: Nandha on 10 Jan, 2012 10:55 PM

Hi Nanda,
We set the content level of logical source based on the granularity of the source.
Say, a product hierarchy is like
Category -> Sub Category -> Product
Say one of your dimensions has Product information, for this source set the level as 'Product'
Say there is an aggregated source which has Category information, set the source level as 'Category'.
Hope this helps you to set your levels.
Thank you,
Dhar

Reducing the topics in default table of contents

Hello- This one should be easy, but I can't figure it out.
How do I reduce the number of topics in the default table of contents. For example, I want to get rid of all the level 2 subjects. For example:
Summary 1
Highlights 1
Sub Highlights 1
I'd like to get rid of the sub highlights... my table of contents is 2 pages for a 5 page document.
Any thoughts?
Thanks!

Oh man... I'm an idiot... I found it.. was super easy in the TOC section. Didn't look in the document inspector sections...
thx

Table of content level limit

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for