Table Source encoding

Hello all,
I was able to configure table source and access a table inside CQL Processor.
The problem is that some of the fields in my table contains data in language that not English.
When I trying to select this field - I get '?' (question mark) instead.
PL/SQL Developer returns the data from this field correctly.
Using JDBC also returns correct data.
Database encoding is AMERICAN_AMERICA.IW8ISO8859P8.
Any help in fixing the issue will be appreciated .
Regards,
Dmitry
Edited by: dmitryz1 on Dec 12, 2012 4:37 AM

The dev are quite busy these days, I am not sure if they have time to take a look at this. Could you elaborate what you have done? So that we can help you.
Regards
Junger

Similar Messages

Logical level for logical fact table sources

it is clear that for fact aggregates, we should use the Content tab of the Logical Table Source dialog to assign the correct logical level to each dimension.
question is : is it mandatory to assign even for non-aggregates fact tables the logical level for each dimension (which normally should be set to the most detailed level of each dimension) ? is it any known issue if "logical levels"in content tab are not set ?
the reason I'm asking this is a strange bug I have (I'm not going to discuss it here) and then only workaround seems to be NOT setting the logical levels (on content tab) for logical fact table sources.
thank you !

If levels are not set: By default levels are considered as lowest level
It should not matter if you set or not
Generally we set for facts explicitly when we are using Aggregate tables.
Your current issue might be a case by case; I would suggest to check implicit fact, any table mapped to the source to force a join etc
Mark if helps
Let me know how it helps
Edited by: Srini VEERAVALLI on Feb 5, 2013 8:33 AM
Any updates on this?+_
Edited by: Srini VEERAVALLI on Feb 14, 2013 9:09 AM

How to get all the column values from a table source

Hi,
I have created one table source on a employee table and some customized attributes using global settings>search attributes.
Now these customized attributes mapped with the table columns through attribute mapping from the sorce tab.
Using doOracleSearch method i passed last parameter i.e. Integer array of customized attributes.
After execution of doOracleSearch method i am getting the results but customized attributes are not coming.
getCustomAttributes method returns null instead of some values.
Please refer following code for more info:
Integer[] fetchAttr=new Integer[2];
fetchAttr[0]=new Integer(137);
fetchAttr[1]=new Integer(138);
result =
stub.doOracleSearch("BTM",
new Integer(1),
new Integer(10),
Boolean.TRUE,
Boolean.TRUE,
group,
"en",
"en",
Boolean.TRUE,
null,
null,
fetchAttr);
ResultElement[] resElements = result.getResultElements();
for(int i = 0; i < resElements.length; i++)
System.out.println("Title : " + resElements[0].getTitle());
System.out.println("Snippet : " + resElements[0].getSnippet());
System.out.println("URL : " + resElements[0].getUrl());
System.out.println("non default : " + resElements[0].getCustomAttributes()); // it returns null here
}

Confirm the attributes you are asking SES for match those on the data source being searched. One thing to try is to simply tell SES to return all custom attributes for your search. Here is a snippet to build a list of all attribute IDs and pass them to your search...
// Create and set SOAP URL
OracleSearchService searchService = new OracleSearchService();
searchService.setSoapURL("http://myserver:7777/search/query/OracleSearch");
// Set attributes to fetch (all)
Attribute[] attributesAll = searchService.getAllAttributes("en");
ArrayList<Integer> attributeIds = new ArrayList<Integer>();
for(Attribute a: attributesAll)
attributeIds.add(a.getId());
Integer attributeIdArrayAll[] = new Integer[attributeIds.size()];
attributeIdArrayAll = attributeIds.toArray(attributeIdArrayAll);
// Query
OracleSearchResult result = searchService.doOracleSearch("some text", ..........[other params], attributeIdArrayAll);
// Print out results
ResultElement[] resElements = result.getResultElements();
for(int i = 0; i < resElements.length; i++)
// Get document
ResultElement doc = resElements;
// Print Title
System.out.println("Title: " + doc.getTitle());
// Print custom attributes
CustomAttribute[] attributes = doc.getCustomAttributes();
for(int j = 0; j < attributes.length; j++)
CustomAttribute attr = attributes[j];
System.out.println("[Custom Attribute] " + attr.getName() + ": " + attr.getValue());
Hope this helps.

Logical Table source source query

In OBIEE 10g we can have multiple logical table sources and we can also add multiple tables into a single logical table source(logical table source source). I wanted to know the difference between doing so and having multiple logical table sources for each logical source.
Hope I made myself clear.
Cheers
Rem

Hi Rem,
When data is duplicated across different physical tables add them as separate LTS with column mapping pointing to most economical sources. Specifying the most economical source is about the idea that a single column exists in more than one table, based on the column mappings BI server picks up those LTS's which could satisfy the request with minimal joins.
When the data is not duplicated add them in a single LTS source. When the physical sources are added in a single LTS, you have the flexibility of using outer joins. But specifying a join as outer join makes BI Server to include this source even if its not required otherwise when the join is inner, the sources will not be included if not required to satisfy the query.
Hope this helps.
Thanks!

Filter on the same logical table source on two logical tables is not working properly

Hi,
In the RPD, assume that I have a physical table named Employee_fact, created an Alias called D0 Employee Fact
In the BMM I've two logical tables called Employee_fact_Type1 and Employee_fact_Type2
Each of these logical tables has the same Logical table source - D0 Employee
But in each logical table source, I've a filter in where clause
such as, for Employee_fact_Type1 employee_type = 'XXX'
for Employee_fact_Type2 employee_type='YYY'
These two facts are present in the same BMM and each of them are connected to two dimensions
such as
Dept_type1 <- Employee_fact_type_1 -> Tenure_type1
Dept_type2 <- Employee_fact_type_2 -> Tenure_type2
In analysis, When I query the columns from Dept_type1 and Tenure_type1, the database query generated shows the condition employee_type='YYY' instead of employee_type='XXX' .
But, adding the columns from Dept_Type1, Employee_fact_type_1, Tenure_type1 it shows proper filter.
I checked the relationships, presentation layer for the sources of presentation tables and everything looks good.
Can anybody tell me what goes wrong here?

did you set the content level as well?

Neen help with date range searches for Table Sources

Hi all,
I need help, please. I am trying to satisfy a Level 1 client requirement for the ability to search for records in crawled table sources by a date and/or date range. I have performed the following steps, and did not get accurate results from Advanced searching for date. Please help me understand what I am doing wrong, and/or if there is a way to define a date search attribute without creating a LOV for a date column. (My tables have 500,00 rows.)
I am using SES 10.1.8.3 on Windows 32.
My Oracle 10g Spatial Table is called REPORTS and this table has the following columns:
TRACKNUM Varchar2
TITLE Varchar2
SUMMARY CLOB
SYMBOLCODE Varchar2
Timestamp Date
OBSDATE Date
GEOM SDO_GEOMETRY
I set up the REPORTS table source in SES, using TRACKNUM as the Primary Key (unique and not null), and SUMMARY as the CONTENT Column. In the Table Column Mappings I defined TITLE as String and TITLE.
Under Global Settings > Search Attributes I defined a new Search Attribute (type Date) called DATE OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY).
Went back to REPORTS source previously defined and added a new Table Column Mapping - mapping OBSDATE to the newly defined DATE OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY) search attribute.
I then modified the Schedule for the REPORTS source Crawler Policy to “Process All Documents”.
Schedule crawls and indexes entire REPORTS table.
In SES Advanced Search page, I enter my search keyword, select Specific Source Group as REPORTS, select All Match, and used the pick list to select the DATE OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY) Attribute Name, operator of Greater than equal, and entered the Value 01-JAN-07. Then the second attribute name of DATE_OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY), less than equals, 10-JAN-07.
Search results gave me 38,000 documents, and the first 25 I looked at had dates NOT within the 01-JAN-07 / 10-JAN-07 range. (e.g. OBSDATE= 24-MAR-07, 22-SEP-), 02-FEB-08, etc.)
And, none of the results I opened had ANY dates within the SUMMARY CLOB…in case that’s what was being found in the search.
Can someone help me figure out how to allow my client to search for specific dated records in a db table using a single column for the date? This is a major requirement and they are anxiously awaiting my solution.
Thanks, in advance….

raford,
Thanks very much for your reply. However, from what I've read in the SES Admin Document is that (I think) the date format DD/MM/YYYY pertains only to searches on "file system" sources (e.g. Word, Excel, Powerpoint, PDF, etc.). We have 3 file system sources among our 25 total sources. The remaining 22 sources are all TABLE or DATABASE sources. The DBA here has done a great job getting the data standardized using the typical/default Oracle DATE type format in our TABLE sources (DD-MON-YY). Our tables have anywhere from 1500 rows to 2 million rows.
I tested your theory that the dates we are entering are being changed to Strings behind the scenes and on the Advanced Page, searched for results using OBSDATE equals 01/02/2007 in an attempt to find data that I know for certain to be in the mapped OBSDATE table column as 01-FEB-07. My result set contained data that had an OBSDATE of 03-MAR-07 and none containing 01-FEB-07.
Here is the big issue...in order for my client to fulfill his primary mission, one of the top 5 requirements is that he/she be able to find specific table rows that are contain a specific date or range of dates.
thanks very much!

Need help with date range searches for Table Sources in SES

Hi all,
I need help, please. I am trying to satisfy a Level 1 client requirement for the ability to search for records in crawled table sources by a date and/or date range. I have performed the following steps, and did not get accurate results from Advanced searching for date. Please help me understand what I am doing wrong, and/or if there is a way to define a date search attribute without creating a LOV for a date column. (My tables have 500,00 rows.)
I am using SES 10.1.8.3 on Windows 32.
My Oracle 10g Spatial Table is called REPORTS and this table has the following columns:
TRACKNUM Varchar2
TITLE Varchar2
SUMMARY CLOB
SYMBOLCODE Varchar2
Timestamp Date
OBSDATE Date
GEOM SDO_GEOMETRY
I set up the REPORTS table source in SES, using TRACKNUM as the Primary Key (unique and not null), and SUMMARY as the CONTENT Column. In the Table Column Mappings I defined TITLE as String and TITLE.
Under Global Settings > Search Attributes I defined a new Search Attribute (type Date) called DATE OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY).
Went back to REPORTS source previously defined and added a new Table Column Mapping - mapping OBSDATE to the newly defined DATE OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY) search attribute.
I then modified the Schedule for the REPORTS source Crawler Policy to “Process All Documents”.
Schedule crawls and indexes entire REPORTS table.
In SES Advanced Search page, I enter my search keyword, select Specific Source Group as REPORTS, select All Match, and used the pick list to select the DATE OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY) Attribute Name, operator of Greater than equal, and entered the Value 01-JAN-07. Then the second attribute name of DATE_OCCURRED (DD-MON-YY), less than equals, 10-JAN-07.
Search results gave me 38,000 documents, and the first 25 I looked at had dates NOT within the 01-JAN-07 / 10-JAN-07 range. (e.g. OBSDATE= 10-MAR-07, 22-SEP-07, 02-FEB-08, etc.)
And, none of the results I opened had ANY dates within the SUMMARY CLOB…in case that’s what was being found in the search.
Can someone help me figure out how to allow my client to search for specific dated records in a db table using a single column for the date? This is a major requirement and they are anxiously awaiting my solution.
Thanks very much, in advance….

raford,
Thanks very much for your reply. However, from what I've read in the SES Admin Document is that (I think) the date format DD/MM/YYYY pertains only to searches on "file system" sources (e.g. Word, Excel, Powerpoint, PDF, etc.). We have 3 file system sources among our 25 total sources. The remaining 22 sources are all TABLE or DATABASE sources. The DBA here has done a great job getting the data standardized using the typical/default Oracle DATE type format in our TABLE sources (DD-MON-YY). Our tables have anywhere from 1500 rows to 2 million rows.
I tested your theory that the dates we are entering are being changed to Strings behind the scenes and on the Advanced Page, searched for results using OBSDATE equals 01/02/2007 in an attempt to find data that I know for certain to be in the mapped OBSDATE table column as 01-FEB-07. My result set contained data that had an OBSDATE of 03-MAR-07 and none containing 01-FEB-07.
Here is the big issue...in order for my client to fulfill his primary mission, one of the top 5 requirements is that he/she be able to find specific table rows that are contain a specific date or range of dates.
thanks very much!

Dynamically change the Priority Group of Logical Table Sources in OBIEE 11g

Hi All,
I have 2 Logical Table Sources(LTS 1 and LTS 2 for a Logical Table in BMM Layer).
Example: Logical Table : Sample
LTS Source 1 : Sample 1(Priority Group Set to 1)
LTS Source 2 : Sample 2(Priority Group Set to 0)
I have set the Priority Group of Sample 1 LTS Source to 1 and Priority Group of Sample 2 LTS Source to 0.
I need to dynamically change the Priority Group of Sample 1 LTS Source to 0 if my role is DEVELOPER where role is a column in database.
If my role is not equal to DEVELOPER then the Priority Group of Sample 1 LTS Source will remain same(1).
Please suggest how can i achieve this.
Thanks,
Soukath Ali

hello Soukath Ali,
didi you find a way to dinamically changing Priority Group?
thanks,
Maria Teresa Marchetti

Problem: 1 physical table -- multiple logical table sources

Hi,
I'm quite new to BIEE and setting up my repository.
So I have a question, if the following scenario is possible:
Physical Layer: TABLE_A: COL_A, COL_B, COL_C
TABLE_B: COL_D, COL_E, COL_F
Join TABLE_A.COL_A = TABLE_B.COL_D
In Business Model I have a Dimension Table with TABLE_A as datasource with fields DIM1 (COL_B).
The Fact Table (MEASURE) would have twice TABLE_B as data source with different where-clauses on COL_F and logical table columns (ATT1 and ATT2) of value COL_E.
So far I have created everything and the consistency check shows no errors or warnings, but I get an error in Answer: Incorrectly defined logical table source (for fact table MEASURE) does not contain mapping for [MEASURE.ATT1, MEASURE.ATT2], when I creating an report showing DIM1, ATT1, ATT2.
Isn't it possible to have one physical column used as multiple data source?
I know it 's working, when I create the physical table twice ... but maybe there's a solution for business model.
Thanks
chrissy

Hi mengesh,
that's what I also tried, but it's always returning me the same error.
I know it would work, when I import the physical table twice or more, but that's not what I want to do, because at the end I have 10 or more fields based on this one physical table. There's one field indicating what value is contained in the record, this means:
COL_F | COL_E
1 | customer name
2 | customer number
3 | customer branche
4 | salesman
5 | date
6 | report number
etc.
I don't think it's usefull to import the physical table as often as I need this field. So I want to divide it in business model.
thanks
chrissy

Max number of logical table sources

Hi,
I have one logical table based (a fact table) on 8 logical table sources. This is done to simulate some partitioning as my customer does not have an partition set up on data base level.
Anyway my challenge is that a request fired in answers does not seem to take all logical table sources into account when building the physical SQL.
The missing logical table source (the one not being part of the physical SQL) does not differ from the other logical table sources.
Is there a limit of how many logical table sources BIEE can handle under one logical table?
BIEE version: 10.1.3.4

Alastair,
thanks for replying.
The logical tables sources partition the data by year. The aggregation level is the same for all LTS, the check for using this with other sources at this level is set and I've tried to force a result from every LTS (not combined but each LTS for itself). Forcing the results is done by using a dashboard prompt in answers filtering on year.
The whole 'LTS-setup' works in combination with Oracle Warehouse Builder. What I mean by this is the following: In OWB I split the data from one table into 8 different tables, each containing 3 years of data (except for the oldest data where the number of years and amount of data will grow over time).
This is done by comparing values of a year column with the actual year. E.g. the most actual table would contain data for the years 2010 - 2008, the next would contain data for 2007 - 2005, and so on.
Now as the years in the different tables will change, I decided to establish an equaly changing counterpart in BIEE. Basically I defined some repository variables: actaul_year, three_years_ago, six_years_ago, 9_years_ago, etc.
The fragmentation content of the different LTS is defined like this:
most actual data: MyModel.Year.Year >= VALUEOF("3_years_ago")d
next table: VALUEOF("3_years_ago") > MyModel.Year.Year AND MyModel.Year.Year >= VALUEOF("6_years_ago")
next table: VALUEOF("6_years_ago") > MyModel.Year.Year AND MyModel.Year.Year >= VALUEOF("9_years_ago")
etc.
The funny thing is that the missing table is the one containing years 13 - 15. All the other tables (e.g. 16 - 18 years and 19 - 21 years) are represented in the physical SQL. This particular table is not even represented in the physical SQL.
I haven't yet tried to take one of the 'working' tables out to see if this helps (getting an idea if there is a limit on number of LTS per logical table).
Any idea?
Thanks
regards
Andy

Question on Logical table Sources

Good day!
I would like to ask for your advice on an bottleneck I am experiencing in a repository implementation in Siebel/OBIEE.
I am to create a logical table which sources comes from two different tables(Physical table A and Physical table B).
I am trying to union the contents from table A and table B so I planned to use fragmentation content.
My problem is that there is no way to distinguish the difference between the records coming from physical table A and table B.
I created two logical tables sources and specified the same condition for both but the server would automatically choose the first one and would not include the records from the second logical table source.
Is there any other way I could combine the records from table A and table B in Business Model and Mapping layer?
Please, I would like to know your thoughts.
Thanks,
Ivan

Hi Ivan,
I dont think there is other way which is equable to fragmentation content functionality.
I would suggest to try with any column is not null or most satisfied condition so that both contents present in the query.
If helps pls mark

Multiple Logical Table Sources In BMM Under 1 Logical Table In OBIEE 11g

I have a question and even after doing a lot of search on google i could not find any article so through to ask you :-
I want to create a Logical Dimension table
This logical dimension has columns coming from 2 different physical tables, TableA and TableB. The relationship between TableA to TableB is 1 to zero.
There are 2 ways to create the logical dimension :-
1) Go to the logical table source properties of TableA-->then there + sign click and then add TableB right outer join with tableA.
Here in the logical table source we see only one table tableA.
2) Drag the tableB column so that we have 2 logical table source.
Please try this to explain without using the concept of fragmentation and without considering the fact tables. I have this question for simple logical dimension tables only.
I wanted to know which is the right way and what requirement/factor decides what to do ?

Check this post
Business Model - Logical Table Source
Let me know for Qs.
If helps mark as correct :)

Multiple Logical Table Sources vs Single Logical Table Source

OBIEE 11g. I am totally confused. Can someone help me with the following for me.
I have seen logical table sources being used in 2 ways. I have a 2 sources tables: CUSTOMER & ADDRESS. In physical layer these 2 tables are linked by CUSTOMER _ID in a 1:M relationship. i.e. A customer can have many addresses.
Scenario # 1: In BMM the two tables form a logical table called CUSTOMER with 2 different logical table sources which are CUSTOMER & ADDRESS.
Scenario # 2: In BMM the two tables form a logical table called CUSTOMER with 1 logical table source called CUSTOMER only.
What is the difference between the above 2 scenarios and which one is better to use when creating the logical table source.
Regards.

Scenario # 1: In BMM the two tables form a logical table called CUSTOMER with 2 different logical table sources which are CUSTOMER & ADDRESS.
-->In this case; based on the columns select source is defined in the physical query
possible case would be CUSTOMER , ADDRESS, and CUSTOMER & ADDRESS
-->Used in DE-normalized scenarios
--> BI uses intelligence based on content tab settings
Scenario # 2: In BMM the two tables form a logical table called CUSTOMER with 1 logical table source called CUSTOMER only.
-->In this case; CUSTOMER properties->General tab used both CUSTOMER & ADDRESS, in your physical query both tables present irrespective of column selection
-->Used in normalized scenarios
-->Forcing BI to follow our way, since we wont set content tab settings
Hope this helps

Time series functions are not working for fragmented logical table sources?

If i remove that fragmented logical table sources, then its working fine.
if any body know the reason, please let me know.
thanks and regards,
krishna

Hi,
is because the time series function are not supported for the framentation content, see the content of the oracle support:
The error occurs due to the fact the fragmented data sources are used on some Time series measures. Time series measures (i.e. AGO) are not supported on fragmented data sources.
Confirmation is documented in the following guide - Creating and Administering the Business Model and Mapping Layer in an Oracle BI Repository > Process of Creating and Administering Dimensions
Ago or ToDate functionality is not supported on fragmented logical table sources. For more information, refer to “About Time Series Conversion Functions” on page 197.
Regards,
Gianluca

Logical table having more than one Logical table sources

Hi ,
Is it possible a logical table has 2 logical table sources and there is no join between the underlying table of logical table sources?
What will happen if we create the request which contains one attribute from each source?
Will BI server return records with Cartesian join?
Is it mandatory if logical table is having more than one logical table sources(exp. Logical table sources are X,Y and underlying table is A,B respectively),
The underlying tables (A&B) must be joined ?
Can someone explain the logic behind the logical table sources? How does it work?
Any reference of document will be appreciable.
Thanks,Ashish

Hi Stijn,
Thanks for response.
You are saying that Oracle BI server will run a query against both tables and combine the results. But if there is no possibilty of any type of join, how BI server will combine the results from both tables.
I have a scenario like below -
Suppose i have 2 tables A and B at physical layer. Both table contains the information of any common subject area.
But there is no attribute is common between A and B so not any kind of join possible between two.
Now if i create a logical table with 2 logical table source A and B and create any request having one column from A and one from B ,
What will happen? How BI server will combine the result? Will BI server not result records after Cartesian join.
How can i model this scenario?

Table Source encoding

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for