Table V_512w_d

Hi Experts,
Table V_512w_d is used for what reason ? A little brief ans is expected.
Thanks in advance,
Riya

https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=20061980&messageID=4685459
https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=20061980&messageID=4605028
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005vp/helpdata/en/71/4c45c24c4611d1890b0000e8323d3a/frameset.htm
processing class
Tcode : SM30 and table v_512w_d to see the processing classes, cumulation and evaluation classes of all the wage types (Primary and Secondary wage types ).Double click on any wage type to get to the details of Processing/Cumulation/Evaluation class of that particular WT.
Wage type characteristic that determines how processing is handled during the payroll processing.
Processing class:
Processing classes are one of the key methods of processing wage types in SAP Payroll. Processing classes are attributes of a wage type. When payroll process runs, various rules and schemas read and process wage types based on their processing class values. In addition to standard processing classes delivered by SAP, customers can create their own for custom payroll processing u2014 for example, a class for fringe benefits. Customers can use processing classes 90 through 99 for their own purposes and the others are delivered by SAP.
V_T52D1 to create the Processing class
T52D8 shows which processing classes apply to which country
Cumulation Class:
How to cumulate the wage types in the payroll, cumulation class starts with standard wage types last two digits.
This is used for storing certain wagetypes into a bucket. The bucket is the technical wage types e.g /1nn wagetypes . So, if a wagetype had cumulation class 01 set, this will add the value of this wagetype into /101 wagetype. This is actually how the total gross works as all wagetypes which are gross wagetypes are set with cumulation 01 which cumulates into /101 (Total gross).. Other uses for this are taxable gross, superannuation totals, totals for allowances, totals for deductions, etc..
Evaluation Classes
These are generally used for reporting. For each evaluation class, there will be a subset of values. The payslip and the Payment summary use evaluation classes. SAP provided default settings for evaluation class 11 (Such as Taxable Gross, Tax, etc).

Similar Messages

Uploading bulk data in v_512w_d

Hi gurus,
I have to upload bulk data in table V_512W_D.
Plase let me know the best way to do it..
Thanks,
Adesh

Hi,
We had a similar requirement.
At that time what we did was, we had downloaded the data from different table from source system.
We have created a program in Development Server to upload the data into target system Development.
And transported the table with data into Quality and Production.
Hope this helps.
Pradeep.

ESI calculation for employee leaving on a mid of month

Hi,
Employee left org on 12 th of month.
When i am calculating ESI it deducted on the basis of Actual ESI i mean Gross of full month, though it should be on gross of only those days when employee served the orgnisation, for 12 days in my case.
I made settings in table V_512w_d for all the wages of ESI basis.
Please suggest the remedies.
regards
Punit

Hi, Durga
I have already checked that the gross is only for 12 days for those employee was present in the organisation and ESI should be deducted accordingly but practically ESI is being deducted for full month.
The basis for my case is not /112 but /3EA ( The actual basis for ESI)
I think i need to make checks in Table T512W_D for ESI basis.
Pl suggest your experiences in this regards.
thanks in advance
Regds
Punit

Income Tax Calculations 2008

Hi Friends,
I have a Issue in Income Tax calculation,
for the month of September, the form 16 for a particular employee is a follows
Form 16 summary
Gross Salary                   783,399.00
Exemption U/S 10                 5,600.00
Balance                        777,799.00
Empmnt tax (Prof Tax)            1,125.00
Aggrg Deduction                  1,125.00
Incm under Hd Salary           776,674.00
Gross Tot Income               725,513.00
Agg of Chapter VI              106,008.00
Total Income                   619,510.00
Tax on total Income             90,853.00
Tax payable and surcharg        93,579.00
Tax deducted so far             24,100.00
Income Tax                       9,926.00
Now i have added a wage Type called Special pay -Rs.100000 in IT 15, eventhough this amount is reflecting in monthly gross salary and RT table, this amount is not considered for Income tax . I.e with or without Wage type Special pay, The gross salary considred for Income Tax is 783399(without any change). Why it is so.
Rgds,
Sekar.

Hi Sekar,
Make sure that you have assigned the right processing and cumulation classes to your wage type in table V_512W_D
Make sure that in table V_512W_D cumulation class 1 is ticked for this wagetype.
Warm Regards,
Kapil Kaushal

UK Payroll (Year End HMRC Return - Taxable Benefits)

Hi Payroll Experts,
Please look in to below issue any ideas and solutions plz revert back to me ASAP.
On the employees expenses and benefits form P11D, section F, which is cars and fuel is not calculating right. It seems to be tided up with the amount paid by employee for private use of the car. Some the figure does not appear and others it's taking off the lump sum payments from the lease car payments, which it should not. Lump sum payment seems to calculating right under section E.
Ex:
The numbers are as follows
1111    (xxxx)    Lease deduction of £490.83 not appearing in box (amount paid by employee for private use)
Therefore the cash equivalent of each car amount is wrong it should read £174.
2222    (yyyy)   Lease deduction of £721.04 not appearing in box (amount paid by employee for private use)
It is showing £438.04   It seams that the lease deduction has been reduced down by the lump sum payment. (721.04-283.00 = 438.04)
Therefore the cash equivalent of each car amount is wrong it should read £1288
Thanks & Regards
Githa
Edited by: PGVani on Jun 13, 2009 11:34 AM
Edited by: PGVani on Jun 13, 2009 11:58 AM

HI Gita,
Let us start from the beginning.
1) Is Company Car Infotype maintained for the two employees? Company Car INfotype is 0442. It used to be 222 earlier. If you are using anything newer than 4.5 B, this is likely to be 0442 in your case?
2) If yes, is the following field maintained - "Regular Payments". This field is found in the "Price and Benefit" tab of IT 0442.
3) If the field is maintained, is this payment being processed in Payroll? If you are not the person who built this system, you must ask the person who did or refer to any documentation such as BUsiness Blueprint or Configuration Document to identify this wagtype. You can also simulate a payroll and look into the log to identify which wagetype is being used. A simple way is to glance through the RT and find a wagetype with the exact amount entered in this field. You will need to confirm by running various tests by changing the value etc.
4) If you find the wagetype, can you please check in table v_512w_d to see whether Cumulation Class 34 is flagged for this wagetype.
All the above will help find out what is wrong, but to rectify it may be slightly difficult at this stage as you have very little time before the due date for submission of P11D. Depending on what you find, it may be necessary to run a payroll to fully rectify. Do you have time to run another payroll before July 19th?

GB Payroll - Pension display in Payslip

Hi every one at SDN family
i have issue on pension contribution display in payslip -
i have configure the pension type and maintaied IT 0071 info type - but in payslip the contribution is not showing
what might be the problem.. Please help me on this
Thanks in advans
Regards
KSS

Did you check the specification of the Evaluation Class 02 for the wagetype under concern (used for pension type) in table V_512W_D? This controls the printing on the rem statement.

Proration of ER Pension Contribution - GB Payroll

Hi Experts,
My client requirement is that the ER pension contribution (based on full pay) should be calculated till the EE gets Statutory payment ie if an EE goes on maternity leave the ER Pension contribution should be calculated till the EE gets SMP Pay.
So i passed on the Pension elements to a notional Wage type (9000), and wrote a PCR on proration and assigned it to the notional WT. The ER contribution gets calculated till the EE goes on maternity leave. The calculation get stopped from the first month the EE goes on maternity leave.
I checked the Schema, i can see my notional WT in IT table and OT Table of GPEN, but the calculation is not happening.
kindly suggest me how should i proceed on this.

Did you check the specification of the Evaluation Class 02 for the wagetype under concern (used for pension type) in table V_512W_D? This controls the printing on the rem statement.

ESI IS CALCULATING ON GROSS SALARY AS WELL AS INCENTIVES,IS IT RIGHT?

Hi Friends,
I have one problem regarding ESI Issue. ESI is calculating on gross salary as well as incentives,is it right or Not?
In Our company they are calculating on gross only,but in sap it is including incentives.
For example:
Employee having gross salary Rs 6000 and incentives - Rs 4500,petrol allowances - Rs 1500 and mobile allowances -Rs 500
In Our company they are deducting ESI Rs-102 ,but in SAP It is not deducting .if it is deducting on Gross salary ,then how can i do modifications in table v_512w_d.
Please give me advice for this issue.
Thanks in Advance.

Hi Lakshmi Ram,
Have you checked whether these are checked for /101 i.e., Cumulation Class 01.
These should not be checked in the check box, means not included in the gross salary.
And also check
Processing Class: 20. Cumulation at the end of the Gross Part.
These should not be included in Gross part.
Check once.
Regards
Venu

Wagetypes are not displaying on Payslip

Experts please throw some light on this..
Wagetypes are not displaying on Payslip. I Copied Standard Form CEDT to my own own form and saved as Variant.
In PE51 I gave my form name as OM01 added wagetypes in Windows and Cumlation IDs I can see Wagetypes in RT Table but I dont see wagetypes in Payslip
What would be cause for that .. Please let me know Its very urgent
Edited by: My SAP Cronies on Jan 5, 2012 4:25 PM
Edited by: My SAP Cronies on Jan 5, 2012 4:26 PM

How can I Map the wage types could you please be more clear on this...
I see my wagetypes 1000, 1001 , 1002 in the table V_512W_D i can also see /001, /002 and other model wagtypes..
please let me knw about this
Please map your wage types that you want to see to evaluation class as 02 in table V_512W_D for that wage type.
Edited by: My SAP Cronies on Jan 5, 2012 8:24 PM

Valuation Basis for Different Payment (BWGRL) not working in 2010

Hi
We have a commission wagetype which we entered in IT 2010 in Number/Unit field.
Since we don't have premium id available, we used "Valuation Basis for Different Payment (BWGRL)" to enter the RATE.
This RATE is not working during our payroll run, however when we are using the wagetype with premium ID it is working fine.
My question is- What could be the reason that the Valuation Basis for different payment is not working ?
I checked the wagetype in V_512W_B table and it has the following configuration-
Current wage type
Valuation Basis = BLANK
Statement/WT = BLANK
%Rate = 100
1st derived wage type
Valuation Basis = BLANK
Statement/WT = BLANK
%Rate = BLANK
2nd derived wage type
Valuation Basis = BLANK
Statement/WT = BLANK
%Rate = BLANK
Would appreciate if the the fix could be provided.
Saurabh Garg

Hello,
I think in your case for commision wagetype you need to modify rule $930 to process the override rate from Infotype 2010 BWGRL field in case you are using the US standard schema.
The valuation basis table V_512W_D and rule $930 together will determine the valuation basis.
The default valuation basis comes from table V_512W_D.In case you want to override the valuation basis rate defined in this table,you need to maintain override rate in It2010 and accordingly have the logic defined in rule $930 for that particular wagetype .
Following is the sample rule definition for a similar scenario.
****(commision wagetype)
NUM= ANZHL Set
RTE= BWGRL Set
RTE?0      Comparison
      MULTI NRA Multipl.amt/no/rate
      SETIN X=NX Set variable split
      ADDWT *    OT   Output table
    =
      VALBS0     Eval.0.WT in 512W
      MULTI NRA Multipl.amt/no/rate
      SETIN X=NX Set variable split
      ADDWT *    OT   Output table
Regards,
Malathi V.

How to avoid unemployment state tax for unemployed

This is for Layoff people
The wage type 1234 is assigned to employee when layoff. Basically the payroll schema replaces regular wagetype from basic pay to layoff WT 1234.
This WT1234 should only deduct Employee portion of FED, State and local taxes.
So I created a new Tax model to do this. Everything works fine but unfortunately it deducts ER Unemployement state tax (/410 02).
I tried adding tax type 10 as 'N' in tax combo table. With that it creates additional line in BSI calculation output with 0.00 for tax type 10
Now sure where I am missing something.
Need Help

First go and check what is the specification for this wagetype 1234 in PRCL 71. let's say it is "1".
Create a new tax classification for PRCL 71 for this wagetype. here is how you do it. SM30 --> T52D2. Select PRCL 71 and create a new entry such as a special character @, $ , ) etc.,
Now, go to the table V_512W_D and assign the new value you created above to the wagetype 1234.
Goto SE16, T5UTM and selection tax class "1". it will display lot of entries for different tax models. Also you will see R, U, W for each of those models. All that you need to do is when you go into to SM30, make sure you copy this entry for tax classification "$" for all except "U" in the field "Res./wrk./UI".
This will ensure the wagetype is excluded from going into /710 for all the tax authorities.
Hope this helps!!
thanks
Baburaj S Avanathan

Garnishment deduction

Hi Gurus,
Currently in our system Garnishment for Canada Quebec is setup like this Gross-Taxes = Disposablenet * 30% to withhold. But, user says it is not deducted correctly.It should be calculated like this Gross - 240 (exemptamount for biweekly) * 30% to withhold. This is for Notice of garnishment. In us also for some other state it has same requirement like this. Can you pl let me know, if this can be done only through Rule modification for Garnishment schema or any other solution for this. Appreciate it.
Regards,
Fred

Hi,
It can also be done by maintaining the Garnishment Processing Class with respective Specification for all the Gross Salary Wage Types.
Check the Processing Classes 58 & 59 for the Wage types in Table V_512W_D
Please award points if it is useful to you.
Regards
Venu

A custom perks wagetype not getting adding to taxable salary

Hi experts.
I need advice on the below issue.
My client recently raised this issue. There is this custom perk wage type which they pay through Infotype 14. Now while generating form 16 the amount paid through this wage type is not getting added to Gross salary in F 16.
I checked the configurations for this wage type in table V_512W_D and found that it doesn't cumulate to anything(Total gross salary, Annual irregular income etc) and hence it is not getting added to Gross salary in F16. Which means due to wrong configuration of this wagetype the problem occured.
Even if I correct the configuration now, the payroll has already been run and results cant be reversed as financial year 2014 books are closed now.
So is there a way to add the custom wage type amount to Gross salary in F16. I explored table V_T52D3 and V_T52D4 but it cant be done through it.
Kindly suggest how to correct this issue by atleast correcting the amounts in Form 16.
Best regards
Mahwish Khatib.

Hi Jagan
I am talking about Gross salary total on page one and not the segregation of components of Gross salary on pg 2. In the segragation it can be added but can it be added in the total of Gross salary on page 1?

Please guide me:LWF NODE IS MISSING

Dear Experts,
We have applied new Support packages : BASIS - SAPKB62062 and
SAPKB62063 ABAP - SAPKA62062 and SAPKA62063
HR - SAPKE47045 to SAPKE47074
But in spro LWF (Labour Welfare Fund ) node was missing and system was
showing an run time error.
I have gone through the SAP note 973398 and done IMG changes in Tables
: V_7In0p_all, V_t7INU1, V_T7INU3 and (V_T7INU5)
BASE WAGE TYPE:Created base wage type by copying /140
SM30:
table V_512W_D maintained the processing class 20 with specification
3 for wage type basis and checked the cumulation class 40.
PE51:
I have edited the HR form and transferred the wage type
Schema Changes:
I have made changes to Schema IN00> INN1 we have delimited the old
LWF funaction INLWF and incerted new function as per sap note as
INUCD -
here i have maintained the parameter LWF, basis wagetype , -- and
01 (Universal grouping).
PCR Change : Sytem was throughing an error saying that "STOP: No rule
in key INCS******".
I have copied INCS and created ZNCS incerted basis wagetype init.
now while running payroll error is not there,
but wage type is not appearing either in RT table or in payslip,
has any one come across LWF missing , what are the steps you have followed.
I am missing something.
Please guide me.
Thanks in advance
Paramshetty.

hiii,
Please find the screeshot.Differeniace is coming in the tax on totl income as after calculaton it should be arnd 19k,Please help.
I hope screenshots are clear to you.
Thanks

IT0009 with Time Constraint 1

Hi Experts,
We have defined IT0009 with a subtype whcih has Time Constraint value as 1. Ideally we shouldn't be able to delete the IT0009 with Time Constraint 1. But still we are able to delete all records for It0009. Could anybody tell why this is happening?
Regards
Niharika

Hi,
Time constraint Class for infotype 0009 is T that means it will depend upon the subtype
If you change this time constraint class to one in table V_512W_D you will not be able to delete the recods for 0009.
Warm Regards,
Kapil Kaushal

Table V_512w_d

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for