Understanding End Of Contract PRE & POST Clause

Can someone confirm or explain how the 2 yr contract works? I have two lines that contract expires on same date a few months from today (OCT 2010) . My questions are as follows:
1.- Do I need to notify VW in writing about canceling my account within a certain number of days/time before term ends?
2.-If No notification is formally made will I be going into a month-2-month service after that for both of my lines?
In advance,
Thank you.

spottedcatfish wrote:
AKHOWARD wrote:
Can someone confirm or explain how the 2 yr contract works? I have two lines that contract expires on same date a few months from today (OCT 2010) . My questions are as follows:
1.- Do I need to notify VW in writing about canceling my account within a certain number of days/time before term ends? Cancelling your account involves two factors. First, you must cancel AFTER the contract end date to avoid any Early Termination Fees. Second, you must cancel BEFORE the end of your billing cycle to avoid being charged for another full month of service. Verizon will charge you for the entire month of service in the month you cancel. What is your exact contract end date and billing date? If you give them, we may be able to help you plan the day to cancel service as cheaply as possible.
Just as an addition to this, if you call cust care after your final contract month, they can post date your cancellation so that you don't roll into another billing cycle. Verizon will only terminate service at the end of a billing cycle since you pay for service in advance.
2.-If No notification is formally made will I be going into a month-2-month service after that for both of my lines? If you don't explicity cancel your service, it will continue on a month-to-month basis until you ask for it to be cancelled. The only difference between being "in-contract" and being "month-to-month" is that in the second case, you can cancel at any time without paying an Early Termination Fee.
Exactly right
In advance,
Thank you.

Similar Messages

Bug: CCDoc fails with method group in Contract.ForAll/Exists in pre/post conditions

When Contract.ForAll or Contract.Exists is used in a pre/post condition, and the predicate given is a method group instead of a lambda, CCDoc fails with the following error:
CCDoc failed with uncaught exception: Object reference not set to an instance of an object.
Stack trace: at CCDoc.CCDocCSharpSourceEmitter.TraverseChildren(IMethodCall methodCall)
at Microsoft.Cci.CodeTraverser.Traverse(IMethodCall methodCall)
at CCDoc.XContract.WriteCSharpFromAST(IExpression expression)
at CCDoc.XPrecondition.WriteTo(XmlWriter writer)
at CCDoc.XmlTraverser.WriteEndElement(XmlReader reader, XmlWriter writer)
at CCDoc.XmlTraverserBase.WriteNodeSingle(XmlReader reader, XmlWriter writer)
at CCDoc.XmlTraverserBase.Transform(XmlReader reader, XmlWriter writer)
at CCDoc.CCDoc.WriteContracts(IDictionary`2 contracts, Options options, DocTracker docTracker)
at CCDoc.CCDoc.RealMain(String[] args)
at CCDoc.CCDoc.Main(String[] args)
Stack trace can vary, but its always the same method at the top.
Example code that produces this error:
public static class Program
public static void Main(string[] args)
Contract.Requires(Contract.ForAll(args, ValidateArg));
public static bool ValidateArg(string arg)
return arg != null;

Hi Lev,
To your question to clear the track
You can delete your track as described in the below link, and then recreate the track and reimport.
Link: [Deleting Track|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/33/71fe94e1834af8b5bd3c0e1de5ab41/frameset.htm]
Do not forget to delete DTR workspace.
Do reward points if you find the link useful.
Cheers,
Sandeep

Error during setup of VSLS2011 "setup.exe: [2] ISetupComponent::Pre/Post/Install() failed in ISetupManager.."

Hi
I have VS 9 installed and was wanting to install LightSwitch so downloaded the ISO(VSLS2011_ENU.iso) and burnt to disk ran
setup.exe and received the this message.
"Setup could not install the following component:
Microsoft ApplicationError Reporting"
The log shows..
[02/09/15,13:52:02] Microsoft Application Error Reporting: [2] CMsiComponent::Install() expects the setup file for Microsoft Application Error Reporting, but the file failed verification.
[02/09/15,13:52:03] setup.exe: [2] ISetupComponent::Pre/Post/Install() failed in ISetupManager::InternalInstallManager() with HRESULT -2147467259.
[02/09/15,13:52:04] SimpleUI: [2] DepCheck indicates Microsoft Application Error Reporting is not installed.
[02/09/15,13:52:05] SimpleUI: [2] DepCheck indicates VC 9.0 Runtime (x86) was not attempted to be installed.....
.NetFramework 3.5
C:\Users\xxxxxx>Winmgmt /verifyrepository
WMI repository is consistent.
PC is win 7 pro 64bit

Hi ghw123,
Welcome to Lightswitch forum.
According to the error message above, this issue is related to verification. For this issue, you need make sure that you download VSLS2011_ENU.iso from Microsoft official site, see:
http://download.microsoft.com/download/8/0/0/80047AD9-1D3E-46EB-8CF8-DFDA59E7799D/VSLS2011_ENU.iso
In addition, if you want to learn LightSwitch, I'd like to suggest you to download VS2012 or VS2013, many new features are added to them. see:
http://www.visualstudio.com/en-us/downloads
You need select the Lightswitch option when you install VS2012/VS2013.
Best regards,
Angie
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.

Possibility to register Pre-/Post-Procedures for an SQL Template Handler

I would appreciate to see the possibility to register pre-/post-procedures for an SQL template handler in ORDS 3.0.
Why:
We use Oracle VPD/Row-Level-Security to secure data access. Hence a trigger sets a couple of attributes in the database session context at login time which are then used in static RLS predicates to limit which records the user can see/modify.
With ORDS 3.0 all sessions are opened under the same technical user (e.g. APEX_REST_PUBLIC_USER), hence all users have the same/no attributes in the session context and could see/modify all data.
To avoid this situation, I need to set the attributes (e.g. the authenticated user) in the database session context before the actual query/plsql handler is executed.
Also, resetting the session context after the handler is executed would be good.
This scenario is in line with scenarios 'One Big Application User' and 'Web-based applications' in http://docs.oracle.com/cd/B28359_01/network.111/b28531/vpd.htm#DBSEG98291.
Different solution approach:
Kris suggested to write a PL/SQL handler where the pre-procedure is called before the business logic procedure/query. This is ok for me as long as I modify data and only need to return no or little data.
As soon as I need to return a lot of data (e.g. select c1, c19, c30 from t1), this approach will force me to write a lot of code in the PL/SQL handler in order to marshal the c1, c19 and c30 to JSON and put it in the HTTP response.
But this is the beauty of ORDS - I can simply define a template, write a GET SQL Handler 'select c1, c19, c30 from t1' and have the data available as REST service, without writing any code to write JSON marshaled data in the HTTP response.

I tried to log the request at Oracle REST Data Services (ORDS) but I could only start a new discussion: Possibility to register Pre-/Post-Procedures for an SQL Template Handler
As I mentioned there, the PL/SQL handler approach works for me as long as I have no or only little data to send back to the client (e.g. put/post/delete succeeded or an error message why the call failed).
If I need to return a lot of data from the PL/SQL handler I would need to, as far as I understand, to marshal the data to JSON and write it to the response body in the PL/SQL handler.
I don't want to do the marshaling, because ORDS does it better.
However, this works for me:
I write a pipelined stored procedure that takes as input the attributes I need to set in the session context. I then can reference it in the SQL handler:
select * from table(my_pipelined_function(:USER, ....)
Now the JSON/HTTP response is created by ORDS again.
I still needed to code a couple of lines, but it is way better than duplicating the functionality already existing in ORDS.
With the hooks it would be perfect because I would not have to write any code (apart from the procedure to set the session context attributes), just configure the REST services in ORDS.

Pre/Post increment query

I have a query regarding Pre/Post increment.
The following code:
int x = 0;
int y = 0;
x += y++;
System.out.println("x = " + x);
System.out.println("y = " + y);
Produces the following output:
x = 0
y = 1
(Value of y is assigned to x, y is then post incremented).
This makes sense to me. However the following code,
the value of x does not get incremented. Can someone
explain this to me?
The following code:
int x = 0;
x += x++;
System.out.println("x = " + x);
Produces the following output:
x = 0
(Value of x is assigned to x, then x does not get post incremented??).

I code with the mind set of "If the code is not self explanatory or obvious, then
it's too confusing and should be avoided".
I am studying for the Java Programmer Certification exam, so this query was more
to try and understand why the output did not match what I had expected.
So
x += x++;
is the same as (where x' refers to the original value of x)
x = (x) + (x++);
which is then executed in the following order:
x = x++; //(x = x + 1) post incrementation
x = x' + x'; //(x = 0 + 0) evalutation of the assignment
Thanks for all the responses!!

Trouble with Pre/Post Roll tape, before/after segment... what the ****.

I'm getting alternating error messages...
"capture encountered a problem reading the data on your source tape. This could be due to a problem with the tape.
To capture as much of your footage as possible, please capture a clip that ends before this segment, and another one that starts right after it..."
And then something about Pre/Post Roll tape, basically the same thing as above.

I'm getting alternating error messages...
"capture encountered a problem reading the data on your source tape. This could be due to a problem with the tape.
To capture as much of your footage as possible, please capture a clip that ends before this segment, and another one that starts right after it..."
And then............
"Batch Capture: Timecode error: Unable to locate the specified timecode. You may have specified a timecode with insufficient room for a pre/post roll operation."
Am I doing something wrong here???

Extra Pre & Post Roll CC In Lieu of Transitions?

I understand that Color is currently in version 1 and doesn't as of yet bring in transitions - but I'm wondering, in lieu of this - if there could be/is a pre & post roll color correction setting: such that, say, and extra second of post roll and a second of pre-roll for each CC'd clip is also color corrected.
This is nice because for now, it allows you to re-create transitions you may have lost in the export to color, and in the future, it's also nice because it would allow you to adjust the length of the transitions once back in FCP, even after color begins to accept them.
Regardless, if such a setting currently exists, please let me know.
Thanks
Charlie

It's in the setup room, under rendering settings, described in the manual on page 102.

Branching w/ a pre/post-test

Hello!
Could you help? I have a presentation that is set to
continuous play from one slide to the next. On slide 2, the user
has the option to skip to take the pretest (slide 31) or continue
with the presentation (slide 3) - I have successfully done this. If
they take the pretest, at the end, they can return to slide 3 to
continue with the presentation. I have tried inserting click box
and button but neither seem to allow me to branch backward,
meaning, return to slide 3 once the pre-test is completed. Why?
Other information:
The pre/post-test is set up where they hit the "submit" to
report each answer and proceed to the next question. All test
questions are randomized (from a pool of Qs) so the same test is
used for pre/post test.
Thanks in advance for your help.

Classromm test is some thing which is a physical activity. So it would be better not to include that in SAP as a seperate course.
And one more question that arises is if an employee takes up WBT, then at what frequency classroom tests would be conducted.
This makes it impossible to define a classroom tarining for post test.
Instead it would be better to define two WBTs in a curriculum
And the second one will be used to book a slot for test. Once the test is completed, the score can be directly uploaded to the relevant tables for the second WBT. So you will be hvaing two courses , with two scores.
The secod WBT is merely being used to store the scores for classroom post test.
if you want to view both the scores seperately, then both of them cannot be stored in the same course

If I end TV contract after 12 months, what will I ...

After reading a few posts about being able to keep my youview box after ending the contract I was wondering what I will still be able to use my youview box for.
Will I still be able to use it as a freeview recorder? Will the EPG still show up?
I will be keeping my phone and infinity contract, so will the youview box still show me the sport channels?
Thanks
Nigel
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Nigelwyn wrote:
If I end TV contract after 12 months, what will I see on my youview box?
The reflections of disapointed family members
BT TV Expert
I am a BT Employee and an expert on TV queries. I am here volunteering my own time to give advice, primarily on the BT Vision+ and YouView boxes. Go here for more info.
If my post has been helpful, please click on the Ratings star on the left-hand side of the post.

End of contract questions (Data plan and upgrade eligibility)

Hi All,
I found another thread also titled "End of contract questions" and it was very helpful but I want to make sure I'm not mistaken in any way. Here's my scenario:
2 Line Plan
ME (primary): 2-year contract, unlimited Data (10/15/10 - 10/15/12)
WIFE: 1-year contract, unlimited data (10/15/10 - 10/15/11)
I signed her up for a 1-year contract on the advice of the Verizon rep that was helping us. It ended up netting an additional cost of $70-100 (I forget exactly) but it was worth it in my opinion because I knew that one of us would be able to get a new phone in 1 year as opposed to 2.
So here are the specific questions:
1. Verizon has done away with 1-year contracts. This means that whenever my wife goes in to renew her contract (and get a new device), she will need to sign a 2 year contract, correct? All further questions will be posed based on a "yes" answer to this one.
2. Assuming she has to sign a 2-year contract, will she still be able to retain her unlimited data plan?
3. Assuming she signs up for a 2-year contract, will she still be able to get "loyalty" pricing or whatever they're calling it now (used to be "new every 2")? Is she even eligible for anything since she's not the primary on the line?
4. In the other thread titled "End of contract questions..." it was mentioned that "The loyalty discount expires 6 months after it becomes available -- so 2 months after your contract ends". Is this correct?
5. Currently, if I go to MyVerizon and hover over the "?" next to my number and "Eligible for a discount" it says: "You are eligible to upgrade with discounted pricing. If you upgrade on or after 6/15/12 you are eligible to receive an additional loyalty discount. " I intend to wait for my line as it still has a year on the contract however when I do the same for my wife's line it says: You are eligible to upgrade with discounted pricing." Does it not mention the Loyalty discount because it's not applicable to a secondary line? Or perhaps because it's implied since she's technically out of her contract period?
I'm trying to make heads or tails of this. At the time, it sounded like a great idea (her on a 1-year, me/primary on a 2-year). I'm hoping it will work out for us so that every year, one of us will be eligible for a new line. I'm only concerned with the unlimited data aspect being that she's going to be going from a 1-year to a 2-year and also the actual loyalty/discount aspect.
Thanks in advance for anyone who helps!!

Leonard1818 wrote:
Hi All,
I found another thread also titled "End of contract questions" and it was very helpful but I want to make sure I'm not mistaken in any way. Here's my scenario:
2 Line Plan
ME (primary): 2-year contract, unlimited Data (10/15/10 - 10/15/12)
WIFE: 1-year contract, unlimited data (10/15/10 - 10/15/11)
I signed her up for a 1-year contract on the advice of the Verizon rep that was helping us. It ended up netting an additional cost of $70-100 (I forget exactly) but it was worth it in my opinion because I knew that one of us would be able to get a new phone in 1 year as opposed to 2.
So here are the specific questions:
1. Verizon has done away with 1-year contracts. This means that whenever my wife goes in to renew her contract (and get a new device), she will need to sign a 2 year contract, correct? All further questions will be posed based on a "yes" answer to this one. Yes, either a 2yr contract or no contract and pay full retail price of the phone.
2. Assuming she has to sign a 2-year contract, will she still be able to retain her unlimited data plan? Yes, if she upgrades from smartphone to smartphone.
3. Assuming she signs up for a 2-year contract, will she still be able to get "loyalty" pricing or whatever they're calling it now (used to be "new every 2")? Is she even eligible for anything since she's not the primary on the line? Not eligible because she is 1)not the primary line and 2)1yr contracts weren't eligible in the first place.
4. In the other thread titled "End of contract questions..." it was mentioned that "The loyalty discount expires 6 months after it becomes available -- so 2 months after your contract ends". Is this correct? Yes.
5. Currently, if I go to MyVerizon and hover over the "?" next to my number and "Eligible for a discount" it says: "You are eligible to upgrade with discounted pricing. If you upgrade on or after 6/15/12 you are eligible to receive an additional loyalty discount. " I intend to wait for my line as it still has a year on the contract however when I do the same for my wife's line it says: You are eligible to upgrade with discounted pricing." Does it not mention the Loyalty discount because it's not applicable to a secondary line? Or perhaps because it's implied since she's technically out of her contract period? See answer to question #3
I'm trying to make heads or tails of this. At the time, it sounded like a great idea (her on a 1-year, me/primary on a 2-year). I'm hoping it will work out for us so that every year, one of us will be eligible for a new line. I'm only concerned with the unlimited data aspect being that she's going to be going from a 1-year to a 2-year and also the actual loyalty/discount aspect.
Thanks in advance for anyone who helps!!

Pre/post processing

Hello group!
Configuration:
Oracle 8.1.7
XDK 9.0.0.0.0(beta)
We use XSQL Servlet scripts (great framework!). We tried to provide single entry point into our webapp. We want to replace XSQLServlet class, and gain control of our servlet environment (transactions, thread synchronization, logs...).
Problem is, if we replace XSQLServlet class with our own class (which extends HttpServlet), we can't use XSQLPageProcesor directly because it is declared private for XSQLServlet package.
So, we try to use XSQLRequest class and construct an instance with XSQLServletPageRequest as parameter and then call XSQLRequest.process().
It works ,but ...
When we attach object with setRequestObject (), requestProcessed is never called.
Why? We mist something?
If we use XSQLRequest (URL url), must we handle sessions, request parameters, cookies ...?
Where is the best place to put pre/post processing of request?
Thanks in advance
Tomi
null

We found just XSQLPageRequest.setRequestObject(), that we already try to use (first post in thread).
We associate *.xsql with our HttpServlet because we want to transparently add controller object(s), and we want to turn this feature off in servlet engine config whenever we want. If we forward it (getServletContext().getRequestDispatcher().forward()), with same name and extension ...
Some code:
public void doGet(HttpServletRequest request, HttpServletResponse response)
throws ServletException, IOException
XSQLServletPageRequest req = new XSQLServletPageRequest(request, response, myContext);
//TransactionController implements the XSQLRequestObjectListener
req.setRequestObject("transaction",new TransactionController(req));
XSQLRequest xsqlrequest = new XSQLRequest(request.getRequestURI(), req);
try
xsqlrequest.process(response.getOutputStream() ,new PrintWriter(System.err));
catch(Exception ex)
ex.printStackTrace();
return;
}When we call XSQLRequest.process, servlet response just fine (except we lost default encoding windows-1250?).
TransactionController is properly attached, but requestProcessed is never called.
We found why. Maybe?
XSQLRequest.process call createNestedRequest from XSQLServletPageRequest, and then setIncludingRequest.
This seems like little overhead :)
We just want to keep our XSQL Scripts clean from including controllers via custom actions in every page.
Can we do that?
Anybody tried something similar?
Thanks for your time
Tomi
null

Is there any event callback for "pre/post-register/unregister" object?

Dear all,
We noticed that there are rich set of event callback provided by TopLink, including "pre/post-Refresh/Build/Clone/Merge". However, we cannot found any callback method for "pre/post-register/unregister" events. They will be very useful, if we to manage the internal status of register/unregister to indicate whether it is still under the control of TopLink.
Thanks and regards,
William

William,
Those specific events do not exist. The postClone event is called after an object is registered. This is frequently used to copy non-persistent values from the cached original into the working copy.
There is also the ability to customize the clone/copy policy used by TopLink in creating the working copies in the UnitOfWork.
http://download-west.oracle.com/otn_hosted_doc/toplink/1013/DP4/_html/descfg028.htm#sthref3950
Doug

Pre-post / parked document in outgoing payment posting

Hi Experts,
could any of You, please confirm, if possible to create pre-posted / parked document for outgoing payment?
We use F-53 / FBZ2 for this action, but sometimes takes a long time to select all items related to a bank payment note. The user want to have only one final document, no partial bookings.
Is there any possibility to create parked / dummy version here, to pause the administrational process and continue later, without loosing the data?
Answers will be appreciated

Hello,
Please try recurring entries using transaction code F.14.
I think there is no account assignment model or sample document where we can create for outgoing payments.
Thanks
Sharan

Post budget document from approved pre-posted budget document workflow

Hi,
We are using budget version "0" for AVC Check and "1" for provision budget used for sending further approvals.
I am uploading provisional budget i.e Pre-posted budget with version "1" and sending two levels for approvals by using SAP Standard workflow.
If pre-posted budget document approved by 2 levels, what is impact on budget posted document?
a) Will Pre-posted approved document be convert into Actual budget document with Version "0" (or)
b) Will Pre-posted document remain same by updating status with "approved", there by User again needs to post actual budget document with Version "0" by using "FMBB"
Please help me
Regards
Sam

CA Sam,
The Pre-posted document will remain the same i.e.approved version 1. In order to create version 0 you can copy from version to version.
Thanks
Shyam

Archiving SRM EBP and SUS Data at End of Contract Period

Hi Team,
We are implementation SRM EBP and SUS solution to one of our Customer.
Below is our Landscape Details
SRM 7.01 SP09
Portal 7.3
SP08
MDM 7.1 SP07
We have deployed all the application in our Data Center and customer have signed a 5 contract to use the solution. At the end
of the 5 years, if the customer wants to move to other solution, they the want the master and all SRM related datas to be archived and copied in
a media, where they can retain for 7 years.
Please confirm how this can be achived the SRM solution
Regards
Ponnusamy

Hi Experts,
Can you please help.
At the end of contract, period, if customer wants to migrate data from SAP SRM to some other SRM system, how it can be achieved.
Regards
Ponnusamy

Understanding End Of Contract PRE & POST Clause

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for