Tables with distribution model(BD64)

Hello
I want to transport RFC(sm59), partner profiles(we20), ports(we21), distribution model from one system to another(it is the same system but after PRD->QAS copy).
I found following tables containing relevant data:
EDIPO
EDIPOA
EDIPOD
EDIPORT
EDP12
EDP13
EDP21
EDPAR
EDPI1
EDPO1
EDPO3
EDPP1
RFCATTRIB
RFCCHECK
RFCDES
RFCDOC
RFCSYSACL
RFCTRUST
TBDLS
TBDLST
I miss only passswords for RFC's and (especially) distribution model(BD64). Does anyone knows in which tables they reside?

Hello Jan,
From NW 7.0 onwards, the paswords were encrypted based and will create a secure storage key which is based on the SId and installation number.When ever if you are copying these tables where the functional entires that requires passwods,which will be invalidated after copying.For this you need to migragte the secure store entires after copying.More over every time when these secure store entires got invalidated,will have a communication to SMP for the creation of Migration key.You need to look further to install migration key for this problem.
1. Check which are the entries are invalidated after copying, Goto SECSTORE transaction ,select "all applications " option and execute,
2. Get the migration key from http://service.sap.com/migrationkeys
3.Install the migration key in SECSTORE transaciton by giving inputs like old SID,new SId,old installation number and New installation number.
see details from this note:816861
Hope you can solve your problem.
Best Regards,
Shyam Dontamsetty

Similar Messages

Problem with distribution model receiver ports

Hi,
I am facing a problem with distribution model.
I am using Distribution model for material classification data. I am sending my classification data using CLFMAS message type to one of the receiver. Again another person also sending classification data to another receiver.
But both objects will run at different times.
Problem is for every run and every change it is creating 2 idocs instead of 1 idoc.
I am able to create an IDOC with my changes for classifications. But it is creating 2 idocu2019s instead of creating 1 idoc. Because of there is another distribution model with same message type with different receiver port has been configured. I.e. reason it is creating 2 idocu2019s and sending to both the revivers.
When I run my changes It needs to create 1 idoc and send to my receiver port. If another person run his job it needs to create another idoc.
So how will I filter distribution model based on receiver port? it needs to create only 1 IDOC ..

Hi kotesh,
A similar issue.
check if this will help.
Do the following:
Go to TOOLS>ALE Development>IDoc Type Development> WE81 and create a new message type and give it a different name - say ORDERS2. Use WE82 to link it to an IDoc Type - say ORDERS05. So now you will have two message types linked to the same IDoc type. Each message type can now be referred in different logical systems without any clashes.
Now you can use BD64 to build your model using message types ORDERS and ORDERS2 without getting the multiple recepient error message.
Then use WE20 to set up each partner profile using your defined output conditions in message control to trigger the creation of the IDoc. Now you will beable to send the same Idoc type to different recepients.
source:http://sap.ittoolbox.com/groups/technical-functional/sap-interfaces/sap-distribution-model-3008763
Regards,
SuryaD.

Hiding fields of a table in distribution model

Hello Folks,
I have a standard table with the append structure included with two fields.
I have created two distributed systems to two different servers- but want to transfer standard table data without custom fields data to one system, where as standard + custom fields structure to other system.
Could some help me out in fixing this.

Hi,
Go for field level filtering in Distribution model.
Thanks,
Asit Purbey

Issue with distribution model

Hi
We are trying to set up payroll posting document via ALE interface. We have done the following settings
1. Distribution model setup with filters on for standard bapi's
2. Partner profile setup
3. RFC destination setup
When we try to post payroll data,it was returned with the following errors
       RFC destination is not maintained for object BUS6001 and method PRECHECKPAYROLLACCOUNTASSIGN
       RFC destination is not maintained for object BUS6001 and method PRECHECKPAYROLLACCOUNTASSIGN
       The account assignment objects could not be checked
       The account assignment objects could not be checked
       RFC destination is not maintained for object BUS6004 and method CHECK
       The G/L account could not be checked
We verified RFC destination and it was working fine. Type of user used in RFC dest is Communciation. Hope this is not a issue.
Although above issues are very general, couldn't find relevant solution for this.
Please, can some one help me how to fix them.
Thanks

Hi Chinna,
Have u checked whether the distribution model is properly received in the target system ?
Thanks

ALE problem with distribution model

Hi ,
I have created one logical sys for client 030 as LOGSYS030. and i Have created one more dummy logical sys for client 030 as LOGSYSD30.
then i have created model view with LOGSYS030 as sender and LOGSYSD30(dummy log sys) as receiver ,then i have generate the partner profile.
next i am trying distribute model view while i got error ,model view has not been updated ,reason distribution model currently being processed.
How can i distribute the model view for same client act as recevier and sender.
Thanks & regards
laxman

Hi Joerg ,
actually i want to create sales order with some changes when the customer create the sales order in the same client,
i used ale . outbound idoc for sales order1 details, again i triger inbound idoc (orde) for creating second sales order based on 1st sales order.
mainly client needs sales order2 without manual interaction(report program)
Thanks & Regards
laxman

Q: Using Path tables with Network Model (api)

Hello
Just a quick question to get on track.
In order to use the Path tables from a network model and to fill the geometry field, is this the right way to start working?
1. use the sdonm api to load network and analyse it (like the demo java file LoadAndAnlayze.java)
2. get the link array from the path object
3. itterate through the link array and use the
NetworkUtility.concatenateGeometry in order to end up with one sdo_geometry line object
4. Insert the appropriate path attributes into the Path table of the network via an SQL INSERT.
Is this the right way or is there an othaer/better way?
tx
Luc

A path by default does not have its geometry computed when it's created.
You can use method to compute its geometry (from link geometry).
If you have computed a path using NDM API(for example, shortestPath), you can
1. compute path geometry by using path.computeGeometry(double tolerance)
2. add the path to the network (network.addPath(path)
3. use NetworkManager.writeNetwork(conn, network) to populate path and path-link tables (assuming they have been created and registered in the network metadata already!)

Distribution Model BD64

Hi all,
I am new to Idoc and all other related stuff. I have a small doubt. Af far as I know, to send Idoc's from sending system to recieving system we need to configure ports(WE21) and partner profiles(WE20) on both sides. But my team lead says it's fine even if we create on one side and include SYNCH in the partner profiles and distribute the model view which seems wierd to me. The basic type for this is SYNCHRON. Can anyone explain me what is right as per SAP standards. Is synch an SAP supplied one or user defined ?
Thanks and Regards,
Ben.
Message was edited by: Daniel Ben

Hi Daniel,
Go through the following links below :
<a href="http://www.sapgenie.com/ale/configuration.htm">http://www.sapgenie.com/ale/configuration.htm</a>
<a href="http://www.sapgenie.com/sapgenie/docs/ale_scenario_development_procedure.doc">http://www.sapgenie.com/sapgenie/docs/ale_scenario_development_procedure.doc</a>
Please reward points if it helps.
Regards,
Amit Mishra
Message was edited by: Amit Mishra

Rows To Columns Or Pivot Table with SQL Model over two tables

hi @all
oracle 10.2.0.4
i have following situation
table_1
t1_id   t1_name
1      reggie
table_2
t2_id   t2_t1_id   t2_start_date   t2_end_date
1      1      01.01.2008      31.03.2008
2      1      01.06.2008      31.07.2008
cardinality from table_1 to table_2 is one to many
now i need this
t1_name   t2_start_date_1   t2_end_date_1   t2_start_date_2   t2_end_date_2   t2_start_date_x   t2_end_date_x
reggie      01.01.2008      31.03.2008      01.06.2008      31.07.2008
i think the max occurrence of start/enddate can be 15
can somebody help

Hello,
One way, assuming 15 is the maximum:
SELECT t1.name,
        t2.t2_start_date t2_start_date_1,   t2.t2_end_date t2_end_date_1,
        LEAD(t2.t2_start_date,1) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.t2_t1_id ORDER BY t2.t2_start_date) t2_start_date_2,
        LEAD(t2.t2_end_date,1) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.t2_t1_id ORDER BY t2.t2_end_date)t2_end_date_2,
        LEAD(t2.t2_start_date,2) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.t2_t1_id ORDER BY t2.t2_start_date)t2_start_date_3,
        LEAD(t2.t2_end_date,2) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.t2_t1_id ORDER BY t2.t2_end_date)t2_end_date_3,
        LEAD(t2.t2_start_date,3) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.t2_t1_id ORDER BY t2.t2_start_date)t2_start_date_4,
        LEAD(t2.t2_end_date,3) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.t2_t1_id ORDER BY t2.t2_end_date)t2_end_date_4,
        LEAD(t2.t2_start_date,4) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.t2_t1_id ORDER BY t2.t2_start_date)t2_start_date_5,
        LEAD(t2.t2_end_date,4) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.t2_t1_id ORDER BY t2.t2_end_date)t2_end_date_5,
        LEAD(t2.t2_start_date,5) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.t2_t1_id ORDER BY t2.t2_start_date)t2_start_date_6,
        LEAD(t2.t2_end_date,5) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.t2_t1_id ORDER BY t2.t2_end_date)t2_end_date_6,
        LEAD(t2.t2_start_date,6) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.t2_t1_id ORDER BY t2.t2_start_date)t2_start_date_7,
        LEAD(t2.t2_end_date,6) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.t2_t1_id ORDER BY t2.t2_end_date)t2_end_date_7,
        LEAD(t2.t2_start_date,7) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.t2_t1_id ORDER BY t2.t2_start_date)t2_start_date_8,
        LEAD(t2.t2_end_date,7) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.t2_t1_id ORDER BY t2.t2_end_date)t2_end_date_8,
        LEAD(t2.t2_start_date,8) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.t2_t1_id ORDER BY t2.t2_start_date)t2_start_date_9,
        LEAD(t2.t2_end_date,8) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.t2_t1_id ORDER BY t2.t2_end_date)t2_end_date_9,
        LEAD(t2.t2_start_date,9) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.t2_t1_id ORDER BY t2.t2_start_date)t2_start_date_10,
        LEAD(t2.t2_end_date,9) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.t2_t1_id ORDER BY t2.t2_end_date)t2_end_date_10,
        LEAD(t2.t2_start_date,10) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.t2_t1_id ORDER BY t2.t2_start_date)t2_start_date_11,
        LEAD(t2.t2_end_date,10) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.t2_t1_id ORDER BY t2.t2_end_date)t2_end_date_11,
        LEAD(t2.t2_start_date,11) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.t2_t1_id ORDER BY t2.t2_start_date)t2_start_date_12,
        LEAD(t2.t2_end_date,11) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.t2_t1_id ORDER BY t2.t2_end_date)t2_end_date_12,
        LEAD(t2.t2_start_date,12) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.t2_t1_id ORDER BY t2.t2_start_date)t2_start_date_13,
        LEAD(t2.t2_end_date,12) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.t2_t1_id ORDER BY t2.t2_end_date)t2_end_date_13,
        LEAD(t2.t2_start_date,13) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.t2_t1_id ORDER BY t2.t2_start_date)t2_start_date_14,
        LEAD(t2.t2_end_date,13) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.t2_t1_id ORDER BY t2.t2_end_date)t2_end_date_14,
        LEAD(t2.t2_start_date,14) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.t2_t1_id ORDER BY t2.t2_start_date) t2_start_date_15,
        LEAD(t2.t2_end_date,14) OVER (PARTITION BY t2.t2_t1_id ORDER BY t2.t2_end_date) t2_end_date_15
FROM table_1 t1
JOIN table_2 t2 ON (t1.t1_id = t2.t2_t1_id)
WHERE (t2.t2_start_date,   t2.t2_end_date) IN (
SELECT MIN(t2_start_date), MIN(t2_end_date)
    FROM table_2 t22
WHERE t2.t2_id = t22.t2_id);
Edit
Fixed incomplete code

Need to rename the Distrinution model ( BD64)

Hello,
Please tell us how to rename the Distribution Model (BD64) along with the technical name.
This we need to perform as post-refresh activity.
Thanks
Hari

Hi Hari,
To rename Distribution Model View: Select the model view and press function key 'F2'. Enter a new name in 'Short text'.
To rename Description/Technical Name: Select the model and click on 'Add Message Type'. Enter a new name in Model view.

Activate my distribution model

Hi,
When I tried to activate my distribution model (BD64) thro edit>model->distribute, It says Model view has not been updated, Distribution model is currently being processed.
I tried many times, but every time I am getting the same message.
How to solve this ?
Thanks,
Ram

Hi,
why do you want to distrubite your model ?
(do you need to distribute it to another R3 right?)
if not than you don't need to do it
just save the model and you can use it
if you have to distribute try checking
who else is in edit mode
if this is try logging againg to r3 and delete
your previous sessions
Regards,
michal

Problem with IDoc filtering in the distribution model

Hello Experts,
We are using a distribution model in which we have set filters as like the following
Filter Group 1
Plant : XYZ
Sales Org: SAP1
As far as the documentation says this Condition should work with AND logic between Plant and Sales Org
(i.e ~ Plant XYZ and SO SAP1 ) but the IDoc gets created even if any one of the condition is met(looks like working in OR logic).
How to achieve the AND filtering between the different objects.
Would appreciate your kind help.
Thanks in advance.
RGds,
Vasanth.

> Jakub ~ Yes I checked the generated IDocs(classified pertaining to my Model)for my model alone and that's where we are facing this problem
So that's the filtering problem.
I would check in which segments are the "filtering objects" located (BD59) and whether it is a mandatory segment. If it is a mandatory segment - IDoc should not be created. If it is an optional segment - this segment and its subsegmets will be filtered out - but IDoc will be created.
> ~ Do we need to apply some SAP Notes to avoid this problem ?
> But why the filter should behave in OR fashion ? I do not understand.
I believe that Sachin meant that the logic is:
Filter Group1 OR Filter Group 2 OR ... Filter Group N
Filter Group 1 Object 1 AND Filter Group 1 Object 1 ... AND Filter Group 1 Object M
Filter Group 1 Object 1 Value 1 OR Filter Group 1 Object 1 Value 2 OR ... Filter Group 1 Object 1 Value L
regards,
Jakub

Fill JCO.Table with Model from TableView

Hi all,
i need to fill a JCO.Table to save some data in a BAPI. I already have the data in form of a DefaulTableViewModel.
Is there a simple way to fill the table with this data, or do I have to loop through the model and fill the table row by row?
Kind regards
Francisco

Hi Francisco,
there is no method which does it for you. I'm not that experienced in this field, but I think it seems hard to create the correct metadata from a HTMLB TableViewModel (for example the data field internal length as well as field types).
Also have a look here: JCO.table creation...
As you may have realized, the other way round - having a JCO.Table, creating a TableViewModel - works via HTMLB JCOTableViewModel.
Hope it helps
Detlev

Error while distributing a distribution model in BD64

Hi,
I am trying to send an IDOC from one client to another client of the same SAP system. To achieve that, i have created the necessary logical systems and made the necessary partner, port configuration as well as RFC Destination. In BD64, I have created a new model and added a BAPI 'SAVEREPLICA' and Object 'BUS1093' using Add BAPI button. But when I am trying to distribute the model it's giving the following error - 'Model view ABCDX has not been updated. Rreason: Distribution model is currently being processed'.
Kindly help,
Thanks in advance,
Deep.

Using of BAPI is not accepted between two clients of the same system, you'll have to use different SAP systems

Error while distributing the ALE distribution model through BD64

Hi,
I am getting the error while distributing the distribution model through BD64. The error is as follows:
"Model view DVGDVH has not been updated
Reason: the following ALE connection already exists in model view TESTMOD".
What does this means?
Regards,
Soumya.

Dear Sapera,
I faced the same problem last night.
We just manually deleted the distribution model from receiving system.
Log on to receiving system => BD64 => change/dispay => edit => delete => Save.
Once deleted log in to sender system and then select model and distribute again.
by performing this we were able to resolve this issue.
Warm regards,

Modelling 2 Fact Tables with Non-Conforming Dimension in OBIEE 11g

Hi all,
I have two fact tables (Fact 1 and Fact 2) and two dimension tables (Product and Rule). The Product dimension table is a conforming dimension and is used in both fact tables, but the Rule dimension is a non-conforming dimension which is used only one fact table. I'm using OBIEE 11g (11.1.1.6.0).
====
Fact 1
====
Sales ID | Product ID | Quantity | Sales Description | Sales Status
S001 | P001 | 100 | bla bla bla bla bla | N
S001 | P002 | 200 | bla bla bla bla bla | N
S002 | P001 | 200 | lab lab lab lab lab | Y
S002 | P003 | 250 | lab lab lab lab lab | Y
Notes for Fact 1:
- One Sales ID can have multiple Product IDs
- Sales Description and Sales Status are the same for one Sales ID (repeating Sales Description and Sales Status for the same Sales ID)
====
Fact 2
====
Sales ID | Product ID | Rule ID | Score
S001 | P001 | R001 | 2
S001 | P001 | R002 | 3
S001 | P002 | R003 | 1
S002 | P001 | R003 | 1
S002 | P003 | R002 | 2
S002 | P003 | R004 | 5
Notes for Fact 2:
- One combination of Sales ID and Product ID can have multiple Rule ID
I'm wondering how best to model these tables so that I can create this report (number of the dimension and fact tables created in the business model, level mapping, aggregation rule, etc)? Any suggestion/advice on how to achieve this?
Sales ID | Product ID | Quantity | Sales Description | Sales Status | Rule ID | Score
S001 | P001 | 100 | bla bla bla bla bla | N | R001 | 2
S001 | P001 | 100 | bla bla bla bla bla | N | R002 | 3
S001 | P002 | 200 | bla bla bla bla bla | N | R003 | 1
S002 | P001 | 200 | lab lab lab lab lab | Y | R003 | 1
S002 | P003 | 250 | lab lab lab lab lab | Y | R002 | 2
S002 | P003 | 250 | lab lab lab lab lab | Y | R004 | 5
Thank you very much!

Hi Dhar, thanks for the suggestions.
I tested what you suggested, but the result is not as per my expectation mentioned above. Here's what I did:
1. In physical layer:
- I joined Fact 1 table with Product dimension table only
- I joined Fact 2 table with Product and Rule dimension tables
2. In business model layer:
- I created 3 logical tables: Fact, Product, and Rule
- The Product table contains the Product ID and Product Name from the Product dimension table in the physical layer
- I created the hierarchy (logical dimension) for Product with only ProductTotal level (as the grand total level) and ProductDetail level that contains Product ID and Product Name
- The Rule table contains the Rule ID and Rule Name from the Rule dimension table in the physical layer
- I created the hierarchy (logical dimension) for Rule with only RuleTotal level (as the grand total level) and RuleDetail level that contains Rule ID and Rule Name
- The Fact table contains 2 logical tables sources: Fact 1 (which logical level in the Content tab is mapped to ProductDetail and RuleTotal) and Fact 2 (which logical level in the Content tab is mapped to ProductDetail and RuleDetail)
- The Fact table contains Sales ID logical column (mapped to both Fact 1 and Fact 2 logical table sources)
- The Fact table also contains Sales Description and Sales Status logical columns (mapped to only Fact 1), which aggregation rule is the default to None
- The Fact table also contains Quantity logical column (mapped to only Fact 1), which aggregation rule is set to Sum
- The Fact table also contains Score logical column (mapped to only Fact 2), which aggregation rule is set to Sum
OBIEE returns the expected result when I retrieve the report:
Sales ID | Product ID | Quantity | Sales Description | Sales Status
However, OBIEE returns an error when I retrieve the reports:
Sales ID | Product ID | Quantity | Sales Description | Sales Status | Rule ID
or
Sales ID | Product ID | Quantity | Sales Description | Sales Status | Rule ID | Score
The error is:
Error Codes: OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 43113] Message returned from OBIS. [nQSError: 43119] Query Failed: [nQSError: 14020] None of the fact tables are compatible with the query request FACT.SALES_STATUS. (HY000)
And the Score column is blank when I retrieved this report:
Sales ID | Product ID | Quantity | Sales Description | Sales Status | Score
Any suggestion anyone? Please help. Thanks a lot!
Edited by: stewartlife on Nov 29, 2012 4:01 PM

Tables with distribution model(BD64)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for