F.03_Financial accounting comparative analysis

Hi,
Can some one please help me how to test transaction code F.03
I have Authorization to post any transaction; itu2019s a test Client for BPT automation.
Please tell the steps/postings need to simulate the differences & make me understand the concept.
Regards,
Suman

Hi,
Go to F.03 & click on " i " icon. It is help file which explains the purpose of this program in Details.
In brief the purpose of this program is
The program carries out an extended reconciliation within Financial Accounting. As part of G/L month-end closing, the following consistency checks are performed:
1. Debit and credit transaction figures from customer, vendor, and G/L accounts are compared with debit and credit totals from posted documents (previously a function of program SAPF070).
2. Debit and credit transaction figures from customer, vendor, and G/L accounts are compared with debit and credit totals from application indexes (secondary index).
The application indexes are used within the system for accounts managed on an open item basis or for line item display.
The description of error message will help to understand why there are any differences in accounts.
Hope this clarifies your query.
Let me know if you require some more details on it.
Regards,
Sheetal

Similar Messages

Financial Accounting Comparative Analysis

Hi
Balances showing, Upon executing task Financial Date Reconciliation, have encountered differences in Financial Accounting Comparative analysis. The spools generated after executing the said task.
I am checked in ABST2, But there is no differences. Guide me where I will investigate?
Regards, SP

Hi,
if ABST2 shows no difference, there is no difference.
The problem is that you can not compare every list and this causes misunderstandings
ABST2 is the right one to check it out.
Further informations in the following link point 8:
/people/javier.reviriego/blog/2008/07/09/year-end-closing-in-asset-accounting-best-practices
regards Bernhard
Edited by: Bernhard Kirchner on Nov 3, 2010 5:37 PM

F.03(Financial Accounting Comparative Analysis)_SAPF190

Hello Friends,
What is the use with F.03?
I have executed this report for one of my company code. Group currency has maintained additionally to Company code currency. it is showing differences for every GL. Why it is showing i don't understand. i have read documentation of this program but actually in my company code, it is showing differences for every GL.
what could be the reason and tell me what is the use to execute this program.
Thanks
Swapna

Hi,
Go to F.03 & click on " i " icon. It is help file which explains the purpose of this program in Details.
In brief the purpose of this program is
The program carries out an extended reconciliation within Financial Accounting. As part of G/L month-end closing, the following consistency checks are performed:
1. Debit and credit transaction figures from customer, vendor, and G/L accounts are compared with debit and credit totals from posted documents (previously a function of program SAPF070).
2. Debit and credit transaction figures from customer, vendor, and G/L accounts are compared with debit and credit totals from application indexes (secondary index).
The application indexes are used within the system for accounts managed on an open item basis or for line item display.
The description of error message will help to understand why there are any differences in accounts.
Hope this clarifies your query.
Let me know if you require some more details on it.
Regards,
Sheetal

Financial accounting comparative analysis Transaction F.03 "inconsistence"

Dear all, we just checked out over transaction F.03 that we have inconsistencies
between accounts receivables on the basis of customer line item (transaction FBL5N),
G/L account line item (transaction FBL3N) and report S_ALR_87012284 which shows the balances of the period on the sales account and on the accounts receivables.
Background for this "inconsistence" was a "retrobilling"-transaction (VFRB) which
caused an error in SM13 (but no ABAP-Dump or similar....).
1) For some document numbers SAP was able to create document numbers and entries in BKPF und BSEG
2) Unfortunately BSID und BSIS were not created ==> means that we did not get a proper view in FBL5N for the accounts receivable-entry and we did not get a proper view in FBL3N for the G/L sales-account.
3) one FI-consultant went then in the system and changed the documents with transaction FB02 - he just added a dot in the field ZUONR
4) All lines arised then in FBL3N and FBL5N (I thought everything is fine now....)
5) No we checked with transaction F.03 that on the balance-side that the summary of the amount of this documents is too high on the balance of the sales account and on the G/L accounts-receivable-account is to high, the sub-ledger for the customer seems to be fine!
Could anybody give me a hint what to do?
Is there maybe a report which creates again the balances in the current period out from the item-lines?
Txs in advance whoever can help me!

Hallo Andreas, vielen Dank für Deinen Input
Zur Situation ist folgendes zu sagen:
Wie gesagt ist das ganze aus der VFRB (Nachverrechnung) entstanden, wobei
ich es nicht zusammengebracht habe, aus SM13 heraus nachzubuchen - es ist ein einziger Satz drinnen, wobei das System einen "Fehler beim Lesen von VBHDR" zurückgibt...
Wir konnten diese Sätze nicht nachbuchen ==> das Arge dabei war, dass Gutschriften erstellt wurden, die wurden in die BKPF und auch BSEG gebucht, allerdings nicht in die Sekundärindizes (BSIS, BSID).... - d.h. sowohl in der Darstellung von FBL5N (Debiorenposten) und FBL3N (am Erlöskonto) waren diese Belegnummern nicht dargestellt.
Habe im OSS gesucht und bin auf keinen grünen Zweig gekommen, da die Meldungen, die ich gefunden habe, sich zwar beispielsweise mit Inkonsistenzen zwischen BKPF und BSEG beschäftigt haben, aber habe nichts gefunden, was auf ein Nichtvorhandensein der BSIS und BSID hinweist.
Wie auch immer ==> unser FI-Consultant ist dann einfach in den Beleg mittels FB02 reingegangen, hat auf der ZUONR einen weiteren Punkt gesetzt und plötzlich waren die Sekundärindizes erstellt ==> so weit so gut.
Leider sind wir erst gestern über die F.03 draufgekommen, dass nun die Salden für das Erlöskonto als auch für das betroffene Forderungskonto genau um die Summe des Betrages dieser Belege zu hoch sind (ich nehme an, dass ein Programm oder Funktionsbaustein 2x die Salden hochgezogen hat - ist aber reine Vermutung...)
Ich muß gestehen, dass ich mich auf der Baustelle nur bedingt auskenne, die GLT0 habe ich gestern zum ersten Mal aufgerufen ==> ich nehme an, dass das die Saldotabelle ist ==> beim Forderungskonto konnte ich auch herausfinden, dass der S/H-Betrag dem Betrag gem. S_ALR_87012284 entspricht...
OSS-Call habe ich übrigens gestern nacht schon aufgegeben, hoffe, das SAP mich da unterstützen kann.
Vielen Dank für Deinen Input und lg

F.50_Profit & loss Adjustment & F.03_Financial accounting comparative analy

Hi,
Can some one please help me how to test transaction code F.50 & F.03
I have Authorization to post any transaction; itu2019s a test Client for BPT automation.
Please tell the Prerequisite steps/postings need to simulate:F.50
1) Process Cash Discounts 2) Process Exchange Rate Difference
Please tell the steps/postings need to simulate the differences for F.03.
Regards,
Suman

FSKB G/L Account Posting
this transaction is not working

Error in F.03 - Financial accounting comparative statement

Hi Experts,
We are running T Code F.03 - Financial accounting comparative statement as part of year end. But now we are facing a problem that, in on GL account (that is Forex fluctuation account) is showing difference in balance in Index base currency)
Can any one tell what could be the reasons
Thanks in advance
Venkat

Venkat,
Forex valuation entries may not have amounts in all currencies.
Regards,
Srinu

Account determination analysis in sales order

Hi there,
in a sales order processing (VA02/VA03) I'd like to know which accounts will be determined prior to invoincing it.
I find the "account determination analysis" tool through the menù path: "Environment" -> "Analysis" -> "Account Determination" (FCODE = 'KTPR'), but it shows an empty screen
The same tool shows the desired data during an invoice processing (VF02/VF03).
How can do to see the account determination analysis in sales order processing, and not in invoice processing ?
This tool shows an empty screen even if the order is invoiced, or not.
So I'm asking: which is the meaning of this tool inside sales order processing ?
Hope I've explained correctly my problem.
Thanks in advance.
Andrea

Hi Nagaraj,
the sales order amount is > 0, but the account determination analysis tool still show me an empty screen
It seems this tool runs only into invoice processing.
I try to follow the ABAP debugger and at a certain point it uses the "account determination procedure" (KOFI00), that in the sales order is missing ... maybe this is the problem ...
Best regards
Andrea

Condition not Appearing in Account Determination Analysis

Hi,
we have some new conditions. these are CRM based. for some reason they are not appearing in the account determination analysis
config Condition 1
Class: Prices
Calc Typ : Percentage
Not possible to process Manually
Item Condition
pricing procedure
Condition 1
Statistical
has Account Key.
thanks for the help.

Its a Pricing condition that u have configured. It will appear in Pricing analysis.
regards

Revenue account determinatin analysis

Dear mentors,
Where can in view Revenue account determination analysis in CRM Billing transaction? In documentation its given that at item level in item overview tab page can we see it biut i could not find it?
Also i am unable to determine pricing analysis at billing level though i have activated trace for pricing analysis in su3
Please help me in this regard.
Thanks and Regards,
Kiran C

HI,
Maintain a seperate Distribution channel for High sea sales. that way you will have a seperate sales area for High sea sales, which will enable you to have a unique combination in VKOA settings.
Ofcourse there are many other ways to achieve this.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Shantanu

Accounts Receivable Analysis: Error in DataStore object 0FIAR_O03

Hi!
I am facing with accounts Receivable Analysis Best Practice.
When I try to activate the both DataStore Oobject 0FIAR_O06 and 0FIAR_O03 in tcode RSORBCT I get the following error:
Data source 0DBDUNS_IMPORT_ATTR not maintained- RSAU231
Can some one help me to solve this problem?
Thank you very much!
Axel

Hi!
Many thanks for your response.
I use SAP Solution Manager EhP1 that have:
SAP BW 701 : SAPKW70102
BI CONT 704 : 0001
In tcode RSA6 I could find the Data sources 0FI_AR_6 and 0FI_AR_3.
Could you please help me how to proceed?
Thank you very much!

Problems with account determination analysis/revenue accounts

Dear forum,
I am creating a billing document from a service contract.
When I create my billing document I receive an error message saying "Account determination error".
I am checking my account determination analysis for revenue accounts in the billing document (Environment->Acct.Determination analysis->Revenue accounts).
For standard condition type DIFF I receive a message 120 saying "G/L account 0000578109 determined from Account determination type KOFK" which is fine.
But I dont get any message 215 (which should be returned under the row of message 120), and it should say "G/L account in document: 0000578109".
Does anyone know why I dont receive the message 215 and why we receive an error message saying "Account determination error", even though we have succesful hit in the access sequence (access no 40 Sales org/Account key)?
This is how to access sequence log looks like in revenue accounts:
10     123     Access KOFK not carried out (initialized field)
20     121     No G/L account found in Account determination type KOFK
30     123     Access KOFK not carried out (initialized field)
40     120     G/L account 0000578109 determined from Account determination type KOFK
For access 20 (Sales org/Account assignment group/Account key) , we have specified an account assignment group on the Sold-to but not set up any account assignment for this combination. Is that what is wrong? The system expects an account for access 20 since it found the combination of Sales org/Account assignment group?
Thanks!
Edited by: Ola Törnblom on Dec 22, 2008 3:17 PM

Hi,
VKOA - check. Both KOFK and KOFI using same conditions with same G/L account.
FS00 - check. Account exist in company code.
This is the log in accounts revenue when everything is OK (EXAMPLE 1):
Condition      Message     Description
DIFF     120     G/L account 0000578109 determined from Account determination type KOFI
DIFF     215     G/L account in document: 0000578109
Access     Message     Description
10     123     Access KOFI not carried out (initialized field)
20     123     Access KOFI not carried out (initialized field)
30     123     Access KOFI not carried out (initialized field)
40     120     G/L account 0000578109 determined from Account determination type KOFI
And this is the log now, when we have the error of acct determination (EXAMPLE 2):
Condition Message     Description
DIFF     120     G/L account 0000578109 determined from Account determination type KOFK
Access     Message     Description
10     123     Access KOFK not carried out (initialized field)
20     121     No G/L account found in Account determination type KOFK
30     123     Access KOFK not carried out (initialized field)
40     120     G/L account 0000578109 determined from Account determination type KOFK
For the customer we have assigned an account assignement group and it finds the account key via condition type DIFF and guess that is why we get a hit on access 20 in the example above (Message 121). But there is no G/L account entered for the combination of sales org./account assignment group/account key.
Instead, we have chosen to have the G/L account determination based on sales org/account key only, as in access 40. And it finds the G/L account 0000578109 for access 40.
But what I dont understand is why we dont get any message 215 as in EXAMPLE 1.
And we get the error message "Account determination error" in EXAMPLE 2.
Thanks,
Ola
Edited by: Ola Törnblom on Dec 22, 2008 4:58 PM

Account Transaction Analysis query

Hello,
I want to create a GL Account Transactions Analysis Report. Can anybody help me with the tables needed for the query?
Thanks

Try looking at e.g. report $GL_TOP/reports/US/GLRJED.rdf - main tables are:
gl_code_combinations cc,
gl_je_lines jel,
gl_je_headers jeh,
gl_je_batches jeb,
gl_je_categories cat,
gl_je_sources src
PS. gl_code_combinations_kfv has concatenated_segments which is very handy rather than dealing with the accounting key flexfield segments separately.
Gareth
Blog: http://garethroberts.blogspot.com
Added PS.

Sales Order - Account Determination Analysis

Dear Friends,
In sales order creation we have a provision to see the account determination analysis may be even before invoice is created.
The path for this is: In th menu bar above:: Environment - Analysis - Account Determination
But in my case when I click on it, nothing appears than blank in the analysis screen
Can you please tell me if anything is remaining / needs to be activated to view this.
Regards
Dhananjay

Just to be sure : Did you check that VBRP-AUGRU_AUFT is indeed filled in the invoice ?
( In sales this field is called VBAK-augru but in billing this field is VBRP-AUGRU_AUFT )
Put a break-point in RV60AFZZ / USEREXIT_ACCOUNT_PREP_KOMKCV and see if the field KOMKCV-AUGRU gets filled.
Alternatively your can fill yourself
RWD POINTS IF HELPFUL
REGARDS
You have been neglecting my repeated requests NOT to ask for points. If you continue to do this, your entire points will be deleted from your account and also you will never get any more points !!!!!!! Please dont force us to do so
Edited by: Lakshmipathi on Aug 30, 2009 8:58 PM

Accounts Receivable Analysis Best Practice: Company Code

Hi!
I implemented SAP Best Practice scenario "Accounts Receivable Analysis" and would like to execute the queries from this example.
The query cannot unfortunately because one of the attributes Company Code is mandatory.
When I put one of the possible values e.g. "0001" I get the following error:
Company Code (Single Value Entry, Required) ()*
Value "0001" for variable "Company Code (Single Value Entry, Required)" is invalid
Message no. BRAIN643
Diagnosis
Characteristic value "0001" is not valid for variable Company Code (Single Value Entry, Required).
Procedure
Enter a valid value for the characteristic. The value help, for example, provides you with suggestions. If no information is available here, then perhaps no characteristic values exist for the characteristic.
If the variable for 0DATE or 0CALDAY has been created and is being used as a key date for a hierarchy, check whether the hierarchies used are valid for this characteristic. The same is valid for variables that refer to the hierarchy version.
Question
How to execute this query?
Thank you very much!
regards

Hi!
Many thanks for your response.
What do you mean with your question?
I load transaction data with tcode RSA1
(0FI_AR_4 and 0FI_AR_6).
Do I need some addtional steps to execute? IF yes, which?
Thank you very much!
regards
Axel

Comparatively analysis of legacy database system ?

please help me by explain this this is our next quiz can any 1 give detail description to this topic :O :)

Hello,
A comparative analysis of legacy database systems examines the essential nature of legacy database management, and discusses
the validity of parallels which appear to exist between them. The characteristics of applications, functions, representations, utilizations, and research are used as a basis for conducting comparisons. Through these comparisons, the strengths and weaknesses
of each field are evaluated, and significant similarities and differences are identified.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Alberto Morillo
SQLCoffee.com

F.03_Financial accounting comparative analysis

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for