TACACS+ and RADIUS - Does either care about hostname?

When first experimenting with TACACS+, I remember changing the hostname on a router and having it cause issues with authentication. Is it normal for TACACS+ to use a devices hostname as part of the authentication process? What about RADIUS?

Hi,
Nope, neither one uses the hostname of the device for the AAA process.
Only take care of the source-interface (source IP address), the shared secret and the ports used.
HTH,
Tiago
If this helps you and/or answers your question please mark the question as "answered" and/or rate it, so other users can easily find it.

Similar Messages

Does creative care about it customers

It would appear that Creative does not care that most customers do not have any idea about the firmware to player issue. No referance material or software is included with the Zen micro. The website has little if any instruction. I have spent, to date, 8hrs. searching and reinstalling firmware, updates, drivers to come to the conclusion that Creative, who at this time are not able to be contacted because it's the weekend, either does not care about it's customers or does not know how to support thier products properly.
I have other things to do than sit at the computer. This Creative Zen micro was to be enjoyed but I'm not enjoying it at all.
Help needed is in post from "rulezbecca".

I did not post "rulezbecca" just replied to it. I have the same problem though.
I posted this to get the attention of, maybe, a Creative tech who might be reading some of the posts.
I have upgraded most of the computer software, firmware, hardware, and other periferals at some time or another with out this much trouble.
The main problem is that after part of the firmware has been loaded the micro hangs and the computer wants me to install a driver so it can communicate with the micro via the USB port, that same port it was using just prior to do the firmware download. Now the micro can not connect via the USB port in this computer or any other computer I try.
How can I get this situation resolved? I have read other posts and tried the suggested actions but none worked with my first micro and I don't want to put this one in the same locked out state.

Cisco ISE with TACACS+ and RADIUS both?

Hello,
I am initiating wired authentication on an existing network using Cisco ISE. I have been studying the requirements for this. I know I have to turn on RADIUS on the Cisco switches on the network. The switches on the network are already programmed for TACACS+. Does anybody know if they can both operate on the same network at the same time?
Bob

Hello Robert,
I believe NO, they both won't work together as both TACACS and Radius are different technologies.
It's just because that TACACS encrypts the whole message and Radius just the password, so I believe it won't work.
For your reference, I am sharing the link for the difference between TACACS and Radius.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk59/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094e99.shtml
Moreover, Please review the information as well.
Compare TACACS+ and RADIUS
These sections compare several features of TACACS+ and RADIUS.
UDP and TCP
RADIUS uses UDP while TACACS+ uses TCP. TCP offers several advantages over UDP. TCP offers a connection-oriented transport, while UDP offers best-effort delivery. RADIUS requires additional programmable variables such as re-transmit attempts and time-outs to compensate for best-effort transport, but it lacks the level of built-in support that a
TCP transport offers:
TCP usage provides a separate acknowledgment that a request has been received, within (approximately) a network round-trip time (RTT), regardless of how loaded and slow the backend authentication mechanism (a TCP acknowledgment) might be.
TCP provides immediate indication of a crashed, or not running, server by a reset (RST). You can determine when a server crashes and returns to service if you use long-lived TCP connections. UDP cannot tell the difference between a server that is down, a slow server, and a non-existent server.
Using TCP keepalives, server crashes can be detected out-of-band with actual requests. Connections to multiple servers can be maintained simultaneously, and you only need to send messages to the ones that are known to be up and running.
TCP is more scalable and adapts to growing, as well as congested, networks.
Packet Encryption
RADIUS encrypts only the password in the access-request packet, from the client to the server. The remainder of the packet is unencrypted. Other information, such as username, authorized services, and accounting, can be captured by a third party.
TACACS+ encrypts the entire body of the packet but leaves a standard TACACS+ header. Within the header is a field that indicates whether the body is encrypted or not. For debugging purposes, it is useful to have the body of the packets unencrypted. However, during normal operation, the body of the packet is fully encrypted for more secure communications.
Authentication and Authorization
RADIUS combines authentication and authorization. The access-accept packets sent by the RADIUS server to the client contain authorization information. This makes it difficult to decouple authentication and authorization.
TACACS+ uses the AAA architecture, which separates AAA. This allows separate authentication solutions that can still use TACACS+ for authorization and accounting. For example, with TACACS+, it is possible to use Kerberos authentication and TACACS+ authorization and accounting. After a NAS authenticates on a Kerberos server, it requests authorization information from a TACACS+ server without having to re-authenticate. The NAS informs the TACACS+ server that it has successfully authenticated on a Kerberos server, and the server then provides authorization information.
During a session, if additional authorization checking is needed, the access server checks with a TACACS+ server to determine if the user is granted permission to use a particular command. This provides greater control over the commands that can be executed on the access server while decoupling from the authentication mechanism.
Multiprotocol Support
RADIUS does not support these protocols:
AppleTalk Remote Access (ARA) protocol
NetBIOS Frame Protocol Control protocol
Novell Asynchronous Services Interface (NASI)
X.25 PAD connection
TACACS+ offers multiprotocol support.
Router Management
RADIUS does not allow users to control which commands can be executed on a router and which cannot. Therefore, RADIUS is not as useful for router management or as flexible for terminal services.
TACACS+ provides two methods to control the authorization of router commands on a per-user or per-group basis. The first method is to assign privilege levels to commands and have the router verify with the TACACS+ server whether or not the user is authorized at the specified privilege level. The second method is to explicitly specify in the TACACS+ server, on a per-user or per-group basis, the commands that are allowed.
Interoperability
Due to various interpretations of the RADIUS Request for Comments (RFCs), compliance with the RADIUS RFCs does not guarantee interoperability. Even though several vendors implement RADIUS clients, this does not mean they are interoperable. Cisco implements most RADIUS attributes and consistently adds more. If customers use only the standard RADIUS attributes in their servers, they can interoperate between several vendors as long as these vendors implement the same attributes. However, many vendors implement extensions that are proprietary attributes. If a customer uses one of these vendor-specific extended attributes, interoperability is not possible.
Traffic
Due to the previously cited differences between TACACS+ and RADIUS, the amount of traffic generated between the client and server differs. These examples illustrate the traffic between the client and server for TACACS+ and RADIUS when used for router management with authentication, exec authorization, command authorization (which RADIUS cannot do), exec accounting, and command accounting (which RADIUS cannot do).

Does Lightroom care about camera color space settings?

I am using a NEX 7. Color space options on the camera are sRGB and AdobeRGB. Does Lightroom care about the camera color space settings when it sees RAW files?

Colorspace is used in-camera for creating the jpeg preview embedded in the raw file (and/or jpeg sidecar).
The colorspace is embedded in the jpeg sidecar, and so Lightroom will respect it.
The colorspace is *usually* NOT embedded in the raw preview (although in my opinion it should be). Its in the raw file as proprietary metadata.
All camera manufacturer softwares respect the colorspace for initial raw preview, but Lightroom does not.
(Lightroom doesn't attend to any proprietary metadata, except white balance).
Cheers,
Rob

My Toshiba L305 - Both Buttons Broken (AGAIN) - TOSHIBA DOES NOT CARE ABOUT THEIR CUSTOMERS

So my left button broke (i didn't do anything) and so since it was under warranty, I was directed to a local authorized repair shop and they had to order the whole new keyboard that includes the little piece of junk plastic piece underneath the button. They fixed it the same day as I watched them and they did a perfect job. They also showed me the little cheap, litte, junky little piece of plastic that supported both buttons and that broke in my case. We both concluded that of course it would break again. Anyway, time goes by and the inside of the power piece broke off. So we go through the same routine. I go to the repair shop, they fix it and they say its common. In this case they even somehow strenghtened it so it would not happen again! So more time goes by (still under the year warranty as of Dec 21, 2009). Now, both my buttons again no longer work (big suprise). So since it is still under warranty, I call Toshiba but now they are saying they changed the rules since two Mondays ago and that I can no longer take it to that local authorized repair center (even though they rocked) but now I have to send in my laptop to Toshiba's official repair center. Needless to say, i wouldn't get my laptop back for 10 days. I run my business from my laptop so how on earth can I send it in? Anyway, I fought a lot with them on the phone and even got to the 'top' of the customer relations department, a frustrated lady named Mina, but she says there is nothing else they can do. No loaner, no replacement, can't get my money back, etc. The only thing I can do is send in my work laptop and not have it for 10 days. So what is ironic is I purchased a Toshiba laptop because I heard they were one of the best made computers. I now know that I was GREATLY misinformed. This is the worst situation I have ever seen in a computer business. The good news is that I am in IT and have lots of clients and so now I have the priviledge of telling my clients to run from Toshiba. I write all this for any of you out there who may have the same problem (because I am positive there will be many more since it is a tiny little piece of plastic underneath your buttons). It is clear to me that this is a defect.
My two big problems with this whole thing:
1. How can anyone expect someone to not have their laptop that they use to run a business for 10 days?
2. Why even have it fixed it if is just going to brake again?
3. So because of the 3 defects of this computer, now Toshiba is punishing me further!
If anyone is reading this who is thinking about buying a toshiba laptop, DON'T DO IT. Save yourself a lot of time, frustration and punishment from the company called, 'Toshiba'. Go with a Dell. Go with anything other than Toshiba. I will say it again: Tosbiba laptops are defective and Toshiba's policies show that they clearly don't care about the customers!

At least Toshiba is covering your repairs under Warranty. My ex-wife's new HP had one of the touchpad buttons break on her system and they want $400 bucks to fix it claiming that physical damage like that isn't covered.
If you don't post your COMPLETE model number it's very difficult to assist you. Please try to post in complete sentences with punctuation, capitals, and correct spelling. Toshiba does NOT provide any direct support in these forums. All support is User to User in their spare time.

Verizon does not care about customers!!!

On Sunday, December 9th, I visited my local Verizon store in
Inverness, Florida.
I was excited about getting a new phone and had already
decided on the new Galaxy S III. The store was pretty busy, so we I to wait,
after waiting for about twenty minutes a very friendly sales representative by
the name of Jay was ready to assisted me. I explained to him that earlier this
year I had purchased and returned a phone but that my account had not been
reset to show that I was eligible for upgrade. He then called into Verizon and
spoke to someone named Brandy (<Phone Number deleted>) who stated that she
could not do anything about this situation due to my lack of having a package
tracking number from the phone I had “so-called returned” because it was not
shown as being in the warehouse inventory. After numerous attempts by the sales
representative, as well as myself, to further explain to her that I had
documentation printed from Verizon showing my account being credited monies
back after the phone had been received back into inventory. In an attempt
extinguish the animosity between myself and this Verizon representative, Jay
asked her if there was anyone else, possibly her superior, which we may speak
to. She then put us on hold while she contacted said superior, which reiterated
exactly what she had previously said. My store sale representative had kindly
put his phone on speaker so that I might also be privy to the information given
by these two female representatives. Along with my frustration of the
situation, I had to also sit by as the two of them exchange casual niceties, as
if the store sales representative or myself were not even present. By this
point, I was extremely offended by the utter disregard for myself, being a
loyal customer and for the embarrassed store representative. The superior
explained that even though I had documentation showing the previously purchased
phone had been returned, Verizon did not have any documentation from their
warehouse as ever being received or restocked. She stated that she would have
to file a form to investigate if the phone was indeed received. I was concerned
because this issue was from the beginning of the year and it was now December,
what if they could not find anything? I asked her that very question and she
responded with the answers I dreaded the most: You will have to wait and see
“if” we can find the phone, you are still under a contract because of your
upgrade, and you will be eligible for upgrade again October 2013.
I can not even begin to emphasize my disappointment in
Verizon. I was completely shocked by how not only I was treated but how these
female representatives had also disregarded a fellow Verizon employee too. At
several points he actually had to ask if he could speak without being talked
over by one of them. I would not refer any of my friends, family, or even total
stranger to your company.
The phone call ended with Brandy stating she would get back
in touch with me with an update (which never happened). It is now December 20th
and I am yet to hear from any Verizon representative. Earlier this evening, I
called and spoke with Jennifer (Badge ID#<Deleted>) who was extremely helpful. I
explained the prior situation and provided her with the exact information that
I had provided previously to the store sales representative which then verbally
relayed the information over the phone to the two female representatives. In
matter of minutes, she was able to find a tracking# (<Tracking Number deleted>)
that was received by the warehouse on March 2nd. She could also see
that there was not a name documented for the Verizon employee that sold me the
phone, which came up during my prior conversation because I had to keep
defending myself that I had purchased the phone not in a store, not online, but
over the phone when someone from Verizon contacted me. Jennifer placed me on
hold while she contacted someone else to help her. It wasn’t long and she came
back to the line reporting that she had been able to reset my eligibility. She
apologized for it taking her so long, but I explained to her that when I had
went into the store, I had to wait almost two hours without getting any
acceptable results. I am glad to know that your store representative (Jay) and
your customer service representative (Jennifer), still care about providing
good customer service. If it was not for them, I would honestly believe that
Verizon did not have one ethical employee who believes in doing the right
thing! Even though I finally got it reset, I have never received any response from customer service regarding their employees nasty attitude and lack of professionalism! After the way I was accused of not returning a phone that they had records of receiving, I think they should give me my upgrade for free!
<Personal information of employees and tracking number removed for privacy per the Verizon Wireless Terms of Service .>
Message was edited by: Verizon Moderator

<Inappropriate comments deleted per the Verizon Wireless Terms of Service.>
Message was edited by: Verizon Moderator

Verizon does not care about this problem

I just spent about 2 hours in chat and all I got from the rep and supervisor is that LG is to blame and they can do nothing about this. They do not care that we have to suffer with a phone that is basically useless because of this horrible update. I am going to seek another carrier as soon as possible because Verizon does not deserve anymore of my money. Take ownership and help your paying customers instead of pointing fingers at other people. Shame on you Verizon and I can't wait for others to leave your horrible company.

Have you tried backing up your data. Factory reset the phone. And restore data?
This should be covered under warranty, if not from Verizon, then from LG.
THe upgrade process took 2 hours on my phone, which was much longer than any upgrade I've ever had.

Apple TV streaming vs syncing and not doing either

I have an Apple TV and a MacPro with an iTunes Library on it. I went to get the ATV on the network and that was just fine. I can get on the internet and watch trailers and download and watch movies. But the iTunes Library won't either stream or sync. It certainly won't sync. It says [in preferences] that it is streaming. And when I check the ATV again ref. the shared libraries of music or photos or podcasts etc, it says "Loading XX Library" - and it's been doing that for about 10 minutes = and I'm right now just testing it with 7 photos and it's not going anywhere.
Network works, ATV can get on internet, it shows up in iTunes, the iTunes Library on the computer is properly named and listed as one of the 'computers' but it won't load to either sync or stream.

It's all about which set up you choose when you set up the library. When you click on the tv in itunes how many tabs do you see (as per the link). If it's only 2 you have set up a secondary library and a secondary library cannot sync.
If this is the case you need to delete (disconnect) on the tv (see the bottom pictures on my link), then you need to start again by 'connecting to itunes' (the top one in the list-where I've denoted 'add a primary library) you will need to go through the pass code thing again, but before you do, look in itunes preferences-tv, ensure that look for Apple tv's is selected and delete any tv's that are already in the list there.

Authentication providers for TACACS+ and RADIUS

Does anyone supply WLS 8.1 authentication providers for TACACS+ and/or
RADIUS?
Ben

So in the ACS network config you add 2 NASes (or should that be NASi?)
One is of type TACACS+, enter the device ip and secret. The other is RADIUS - unless you need to use some vendor specific trickery you could stick with IETF RADIUS to keep it simple. Again enter the IP and the secret.
Assuming you a have at least 1 user in say, the default group (acs group 0) you then need to do some basic setup. In ACS a single group can have both RADIUS and TACACS+ config :-)
RADIUS will pretty much default to PPP anyway, but you should still set the Service-Type to Framed and set session timeouts etc.
With T+ you tick the boxes for the services that are allowed. For SSH login you might have to define a custom service first (under interface config)
Suggest you first take time to scan through the ACS docs.

Configure PIX to use both TACACS and RADIUS for VPN

PIX 506E using ver 6.3: Whenever I add the command "crypto map mymap client authentication PARTNERAUTH" it removes the current TACACS+ client authentication. I need to have both until I've finished testing the radius server. Can I add an additional crypto map designation command to accomodate and use both the current TACACS+ (ACS) and RADIUS?

Hi,
Unfortunately what you want to do cannot be done on the pix, let's say that you have
multiple vpn groups on your firewall, as soon as you apply the following command:
crypto map mymap client authentication partnerauth
where parnerauth can a radius, tacacs, tacacs+ or an ACS server:
aaa-server partnerauth protocol radius
aaa-server partnerauth (inside) host 172.18.124.196 cisco123
As soon as you use "crypto map mymap client authentication partnerauth" the authentication
is applied globally on the crytpmap, thus affecting all the vpn groups configured.
You can have multiple vpn groups running on your firewall (dynamic crypto maps) but you
need to associate them to a static crypto map ( crypto dynamic-map dynmap 10 set
transform-set myset).
You can only have 1 crypto map applied to one interface, when you apply this line:
"crypto map mymap client authentication partnerauth"
The authentication is applied to ALL the clients, we cannot separate the extended
authentication based on the vpn group or ip address.
Please rate if that helps !
Regards,
~JG

Verizon does not care about poor service

Loyal VZ customer for many years. Problems with service where I moved to over a year ago. 3 & 4 bars showing on the phone and some days it just doesn't work. Upgraded plan with promise that it would solve the problems. Nope, lied to yet again! The signal comes & goes, but get this; the broadband works when the phone will not! Believe it or not, mostly when it is raining. Many calls to tech support and uncountable tries to get through. They have NEVER called back when promised. Not that I would get the call anyway. I get the fealing that tech support gets the run around from their own field people. My call has been dropped in the middle of a call with tech support more than once. Sometimes voice mails show up on the phone the day after they were left or if I drive far enough to find another tower. The phone works fine everywhere else I go. This is obviously not the phone, it is the local tower, which is only six miles away. This spells out breach of contract on the part of Verizon. They don't seem to understand that when I do finally leave, I will not be obligated to pay any cancellation fees. I am not in breach of contract, they are.
I keep paying the bill so I won't have to deal with the issues involved in changing carriers, but I am getting close to twisting off. It is due again. Maybe it is time.........................

bobvz wrote:
Loyal VZ customer for many years. Problems with service where I moved to over a year ago. 3 & 4 bars showing on the phone and some days it just doesn't work. Upgraded plan with promise that it would solve the problems. Nope, lied to yet again! The signal comes & goes, but get this; the broadband works when the phone will not! Believe it or not, mostly when it is raining. Many calls to tech support and uncountable tries to get through. They have NEVER called back when promised. Not that I would get the call anyway. I get the fealing that tech support gets the run around from their own field people. My call has been dropped in the middle of a call with tech support more than once. Sometimes voice mails show up on the phone the day after they were left or if I drive far enough to find another tower. The phone works fine everywhere else I go. This is obviously not the phone, it is the local tower, which is only six miles away. This spells out breach of contract on the part of Verizon. They don't seem to understand that when I do finally leave, I will not be obligated to pay any cancellation fees. I am not in breach of contract, they are.
I keep paying the bill so I won't have to deal with the issues involved in changing carriers, but I am getting close to twisting off. It is due again. Maybe it is time.........................
It most certainly does not indicate a "breach of contract." Per the Customer Agreement you were accepting when you came to VZW:
Where and How Does Verizon Wireless Service Work?
Wireless devices use radio transmissions, so unfortunately you can't get Service if your device isn't in range of a transmission signal. And please be aware that even within your Coverage Area, many things can affect the availability and quality of your Service, including network capacity, your device, terrain, buildings, foliage and weather.
What Are My Rights for Dropped Calls or Interrupted Service?
If you drop a call in your Coverage Area, redial. If it's answered within 5 minutes, call us within 90 days if you're a Postpay customer, or within 45 days if you're a Prepaid customer, and we'll give you a 1–minute airtime credit. If you're a Postpay customer and you lose Service in your Coverage Area for more than 24 hours in a row and we're at fault, call us within 180 days and we'll give you a credit for the time lost. Please be aware that these are your only rights for dropped calls or interrupted Service.
The bold in the last sentence was mine to emphasize the most important qualifier of the whole. In the first paragraph, it essentially states that the service and quality is not guaranteed (even if VZW is historically the most reliable provider in the country). The second paragraph states that you can be compensated for the lost time and that this compensation is the only right you have regarding dropped calls or interrupted service (outages and whatnot). Terminating the contract would still generate the early termination fee, which you would certainly be responsible for.
All of this, though, overlooks the essentials. Have the technical support representatives filed any tickets to have the tower looked at? Did the tickets get any sort of resolution? Issues with individuals dropping the ball does not equate to the apathy with respect to the service quality.

VZW does not care about their customers!

I have never been more frustrated with a Company and their complete lack of concern for their paying customers!!! My Samsung Galaxy S4 (which I have had since June 2013) is having trouble receiving text messages from iPhones. This was a brand new line in June 2013 and has not had an iPhone associate with it. This problem started a few weeks back and I have spent countless hours going into Verizon, talking to tech support, conferencing in with family members and Apple to troubleshoot their problems….and no solution!!! Today I call Verizon to update the ticket (the iphone that Apple troubleshooted LAST NIGHT and said everything was fine still cannot send me a text message)…and what does Verizon tell me??? Your escalated ticket is resolved. RESOLVED??????? I am not receiving text messages from iPhones (yet it shows delivered on the iPhone) and my problem is resolved?!?! It's resolved because Verizon has wiped their hands stating that it is an Apple problem…the solutions that were given to me:
1. Have anyone that you know of that has an iPhone contact Apple when they can't text you so they can troubleshoot their phone. Ok, so I need to tell all of my family and friends who have iPhones plus 1400 employees that if you have an iPhone (my phone is also my work cell phone), you may or may not be able to text me and if you can't please call Apple customer service and figure it out with them. But even after you do that - I still won't receive the message.
2. Great news - you are eligible to enroll in our EDGE plan. Just give us the Samsung that you paid $300 dollars and pay $25 a month for a new iPhone and then you won't have an issue with not receiving iMessages. Is that a serious solution?????????????
3. Pay $270 to cancel your line, $125 to cancel your second line and $325 to cancel your third line.
I will be contacting the BBB and filing a complaint. I have never been more disappointed, upset and frustrated by a complete lack of disregard by a Company than i have with Verizon. Do the right thing and give me a proper solution.

First I don't work for Verizon so if angry take it out on Apple because that is actually where the fault lies.
Now on to trying to help.
IPhone users have to have the send as sms/MMS/text radio button on to send to you. You cannot get imessage on an android device. Text and SMS or MMS only. Now that will send to you.
The other thing iPhone users may have to do is going into contacts is edit the contact for you to send text messages. Or as the Apple Forum suggests simply delete the entry and recreate it. http://www.apple.com
Personally I have two iphones and my wife always buys droids (LG G2 is her latest device) and she and I have no difficulty texting or sending photos or attachments to each other at all.
My next suggestion is call 800-922-0204 and have a tech reset your text messaging by removing it from their end and just reset it on your account via their switch. Many times a simple refresh will correct the problem.
Another thing to try is send a text message, then a picture message, or a small video to a friend with an iPhone. See in turn if any of them are received. If they are let that person do the same back to you. This way you will know for certain if it is a fault with your device or Apple IPhone s .
Good Luck

TACACS+ and RADIUS

Hi,
Can i configured on aironet 1100 RAIDIUS for users and TACACS for administration?
With Cisco ACS i can only add one option.
I want to centralize the AAA for all the equipments and use CISCO ACS!
But the AP's are radio clients already!
TKS

Yes, you can do both on the AP1100. Use something similar to the configuration below:
aaa new-model
aaa group server radius rad_eap
server x.x.x.x auth-port 1645 acct-port 1646
aaa group server tacacs+ tacacs_here
server x.x.x.x
aaa authentication login default group tacacs+ group tacacs_here
aaa authentication login wireless_client group rad_eap
dot11 ssid SSID4ME
vlan xxx
authentication open eap wireless_client

Does Nokia care about its customers..seems like no...

i posted my sentiments on a number of the posts on Nokia website...and immediately got a warning email saying that Nokia read all the messages and there is no need to post my message on many posts....
Well a month later....here is me thinking that if NOKIA does read the post why hasn't NOKIA DONE ANYTHING ABOUT IT......
Well read this.....go back to making paper cos making phones you WERE good at...but your customer service stinks....there are 400 avg views on this topic which means that if you would just fix 400 phones then the problem would be gone..chances of me ever buying a Nokia product ever again.....greater than 400/1......
IF you want to contact me...please do so but only if you are offering to fix the design problem free...
The last time i posted this is what i got.....
Hi iPhoneAnyday,
Your posts from the thread "Re: Lumia broken usb connector, phone won't charge" were removed because you already have posted the same messages on the same thread. Note that posting once in the appropriate board is sufficient to get an answer or help from our community.
Thank you for your understanding.

This is a user-to-user forum. That reponse you got is from a moderator. If you want an answer directly from Nokia, you need to contact them via the official support channels. They are on the Nokia website in the country you are in.
400 views are views from other users, it does not mean anything other than that. I have viewed you post but I do not have the same concern.

Verizon does not care about its customers

I have had verizon fios for quite a while now, the service itself is great but... I am a litle tired of the hackers, not sure if they are outside hackes or if this is an inside job....
ovh.net is constanly in my logs
94.23.4.33
94.23.42.81
and after I blocked these address' they moved to canada
192.99.193.56.
I changed the ip on my computer every couple of days or so, but within 15 to 20 min my logs start to fill. I contacted the FCC and complained to my state, I get a call back from the great folks at verizon, but I end up with tech advising me that it is impossitble to hack into my computer, and maybe I have malware and I need to purchase their antivirus. I have found numerous articles about how to hack the verizon router, and a friend of mine has proved that they work. Folks I would suggest if you have the knowledge or a friend that does make a passive internet tap, and sit back and watch the traffic that comes through. After doing this I was no longer stunned when my logs would suddenly reset by themselves.

It is best to do the factory reset before downloading the update, because some of the apps that you have downloaded may conflict with the update. If you are having troubles with the new update I suggest you backup your applications, and then complete a factory reset.
The applications that come preinstalled on your device that you mentioned have no affect on your phone or its battery life, unless you have clicked and installed them to your device.
MasterResett: Allows to reset device back to factory settings.
Factory Reset option 1
From the main screen, touch menu tab
Touch Settings
Touch Privacy
Touch Factory Data reset
Touch Reset Phone
Warning: This will erase all data from your phone, including:
Your Google account
System and application data and settings
Downloaded Applications
It will not erase: Current System software and bundled applications; SD Card files, such as music or Photos

TACACS+ and RADIUS - Does either care about hostname?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for