Task decision with check authorisation of release

Hello,
I am using Task decision for release purchase requisition with BAPI. I want to add authorisation check on release Key.
and block release and hold workitem decision if the user has not authorisation.
I don't know, how make this check in using tab "method" of decision task  or with "exit" tab class exit ?
Best regards
Christine

You can achive this by normal SAP Security Authorization. If a person does not have authorization of ME29N he will not be able to execute the Task of Release.
If you are using decsision task then you can make the Task attribute as GENERAL FORWARDING NOT ALLOWED.
After this you assign the Role of the the user in the task so the person who has the authorization only will receive the workitem for approval.
Thanks
Arghadip
Edited by: Arghadip Kar on Jun 22, 2010 10:23 PM

Similar Messages

  • Pls release Facebook Application with Check-in but...

    I wanna check in at Facebook  with Nokia E 72 like iphone and Amdriod phone . pls release Facebook Application with Check-in button . Most of FB application don't have check-in button (Ovi Store)

     Maybe you could contact the authors of Facinate via their Facebook page and ask them if they have any plans to release a version of their app for the E 72.
    http://www.facebook.com/facinate
    Ray. 

  • Single task flow with multiple tabs not working properly in UIShell

    Hi,
    I am using the UIShell Dynamic tabs concept. Here am creating the task flow with a fragment which am binding to the backing bean. if am trying to open the same task flow in two tabs.the getter of backing bean are calling for both tabs when am opening the second tab.
    Please provide me any solution or why backing bean getter is firing for the first tab even i opened the second tab.
    Reg,
    Brahma B.

    There are a few problems that I have noticed so far.
    Line #1 <!doctype html5> is not recognised, hence the page will revert back to HTML 4.01 Transitoinal. It should read <!doctype html>
    Line #51 (links to) style rules should be placed in the <head> element, not in the <body> element
    Lines #124, #159 and #188 all link to the same JS file. Delete two of them.
    Lines #126, #161 and #207 contain a constructor for the same widget. The former two should be deleted.
    Lines #190 and #208 contain a constructor for the same widget. The former should be deleted
    Although JS can be placed anywhere in a document, I tend to place all JS at the bottom, just above the ending body tag (</body>) unless the JS is required for rendering purposes in which case it should be placed where it is required. This way, you can keep check of what you have linked to and which constructors you have created thus eliminating the problems mentioned above.
    Also you might like to have a look at a collapsible panel group http://labs.adobe.com/technologies/spry/samples/collapsiblepanel/CollapsiblePanelGroupSamp le.html. This will simplify the code somewhat.
    Gramps

  • F110 Payment run authorisation for release of funds

    Hi All,
    we are in the process of streamlining our SAP banking process with Westpac's integrated banking system.
    Specifically the AP and payroll process.  Under the current system we upload the payment file to their online system and we then have two signatories who sign in and authorise the release of funds online.
    Under the new process, we want to remove any manual handling of the payment files.  It is assumed that the authorisation for the release of funds is done in SAP and there is no online signature for the release of the funds. 
    The only way i can think of to do this is by controlling access the payment run process and have our signatories process one element of the payment run each I.e.
    1)    AP clerk creates the payment proposal
    2)    Signatory 1 executes the payment proposal
    3)    Signatory 2 Executes the print of the payment run (this stage produces our output file which is sent directly to the bank)
    However, this seems a little clunky and our signatories are not necessarily SAP users.  does anyone have suggestions for a more elegant solutions to this? 
    many thanks
    Phil.

    Please work with you Security Team. The solution for this is:
    1. Create Three differenet Roles
    For Scenario 1) AP clerk creates the payment proposal
    Solution. Give in Role 1
    Key        Action
    02         Edit parameters
    03         Display parameters
    For Scenario  2) Signatory 1 executes the payment proposal
    Solution. Give in Role 2
    11         Execute proposal
    12         Edit proposal
    13         Display proposal
    14         Delete proposal
    15         Create payment medium proposal
    For Scenario  3) Signatory 2 Executes the print of the payment run (this stage produces our output file which is sent directly to the bank)
    Solution. Give in Role 3
    21         Execute payment run
    23         Display payment run
    24         Delete payment run payment data
    25         Create payment media of payment run
    26         Delete payment orders of payment run
    31         Print payment medium manually
    to See the above option follow the below path:
    T-Code F110>Enviornemnt>Authorization
    Hope this helps.
    Please let me know if you have any questions.
    Regards,
    Vivek Srivastava

  • Problem in COHV with mass processing function Release.

    Hello,Guru's
    I have problem in COHV with mass processing function Release.
    even after execution of COHV the status of Orders remains unchanged.i.e. remain Created instead of Release
      My user require all Orders should release in mass process
    with material availability Check .
    and OPJK setting is
    material availability
    Check availability during order release=X
    Release material = 1(User decides on release if parts are missing)

    > with material availability Check .
    > and OPJK setting is
    > material availability
    >  Check availability during order release=X
    > Release material = 1(User decides on release if parts are missing)
    Hi,
    With these two settings in OPJK, there will not be any impact on COHV.
    Any dates, date ranges you are inputing in the COHV.
    Try with Manually inputing some of the Orders in COHV and in the Foreground you try.
    Afterwards, try with Some selected Orders in the Background..
    You may get the clue for the problem..
    Regards,
    Siva

  • 11g Human Task; problem with Auto-Generate Task Form

    Version: WebLogic Server 10.3.5.0 Fri Apr 1 20:20:06 PDT 2011 1398638
    Using book: Getting Started with Oracle SOA 11g R1, A Hands-On Tutorial
    Had success through Chapt 7. Now working through 8, Creating Human Tasks -- almost everything checks out.
    Deployed POProcessing success (with 1 warning: assignee not specified)
    Deployed ApproveTaskDetails (from Application menu) success
    -Run the test tool in Enterprise Manager 11g
    -Response looks according to book, using Launch Flow Trace button I see ManualPOApproval is in running state, as expected.
    -Run Oracl BPM Worklist, log in according to book (weblogic)
    -I can see the Approve Order line under the My Tasks tab
    When I select the Approve Order line item, according to book I should see Approve Order Contents in the lower pane.
    But the details never populate the pane and I see "Waiting for..." in Explorer status bar.
    The logs are filling up with the following statement repeated about 2/second (from D:\oracle\Middleware\home_11gR1\user_projects\domains\domain1\servers\soa_server1\logs\access.log) ...
    =====snippet begins======
    0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1 - weblogic [21/Oct/2011:17:38:05 -0500] "GET /integration/worklistapp/faces/login.jspx?_afrLoop=2609043717008&_afrWindowMode=0&_adf.ctrl-state=bcqg1x7gm_9 HTTP/1.1" 200 5486
    0:0:0:0:0:0:0:1 - - [21/Oct/2011:17:38:05 -0500] "GET /workflow/ApproveTaskDetails/faces/adf.task-flow?bpmWorklistTaskId=47d0f109-2de1-4851-a5cf-1c338050f3c2&bpmWorklistContext=b5d5e48b-9c54-4e3d-a707-19c9e99f618e%3B%3B4iKnpxQCfUvYnghbxihMXgZAOsVJ%2BqeiE79gFBzb%2BlKq9vlbpqV2%2FyQ21%2BLHnBcvJA6mBOoc238GDGR9odBPBE%2FZdeDrfVwfIUCOa%2Fsc%2BRRnmEkzS5f1mKd3oWpasvIhZDkCz5conIhVCKJvCxxz0i1NpCk9WWoVBHpUX39ayhF%2B0aI1p%2FGImOsYBEXDIBEDADen3JkeoewYEJwpVcQf6XzOA5rTEojcUHt28znFHboPdkJ8TW7jfvgQnHNRS5XB&bpmWorklistHttpURL=http%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%3A8001%2Fintegration%2Fworklistapp%2Ffaces&bpmWorklistHome=home.jspx&bpmWorklistReassign=reassignTask.jspx&bpmWorklistRoute=routeTask.jspx&bpmWorklistRequestInfo=requestInfo.jspx&bpmWorklistSecurity=signTask.jspx&tz=America%2FChicago&lg=en&cy=US&vr=&dispNameLg=en&dispNameCy=US&dispNameVr=&df=medium&dt=both&tf=short&bpmWorklistSessionTimeoutInterval=1500&bpmBrowserWindowStatus=taskFlowReturn&adf.tfDoc=%2FWEB-INF%2FManualPOApproval_TaskFlow.xml&adf.tfId=ManualPOApproval_TaskFlow&_task-flow-return=http%3A%2F%2Flocalhost%3A8001%2Fintegration%2Fworklistapp%2Ffaces%2Fadf.task-flow-return%3F_adf.ctrl-state%3Dbcqg1x7gm_49&_adf.winId=bcqg1x7gm_40&_afrLoop=4624989043858&_afrWindowMode=0&_afrWindowId=null HTTP/1.1" 200 5478
    =====snippet ends======
    Thanks for any assistance!
    MichaelM

    Resolved by disabling pop-up blocking in IE8.

  • Actionable Task form with data as an email in Human task implementation.

    Hi All,
    In one scenario in my project, I need to design an actionable task form with data as an email, and this email can be sent to specific users to actions ( like updating, approval, rejection etc). The users should be able to edit the data in email only ( not needed to login in BPM work-list). Please let me know if it is possible to design such task forms and how to push and receive data in email from user.
    Thanks,
    rps

    Hi, Check this below links,
    Send external email from within ABAP program.
    http://www.sapdevelopment.co.uk/reporting/email/attach_xls.htm
    Sending mail with attachment.
    http://www.sap-img.com/abap/sending-email-with-attachment.htm
    Regards,
    Joan

  • I would like to create the a swatch, add it to the library and import to the swatch panel.  The help pages available relate to earlier versions of Muse, which does not work with the 2014.2 release version that I have.  I have created a library folder, imp

    I would like to create the a swatch, add it to the library and import to the swatch panel.  The help pages available relate to earlier versions of Muse, which does not work with the 2014.2 release version that I have.  I have created a library folder, imported the colour swatch as just 4 colours as a mulib file.  I drag the four colours on to the muse page in design view but that is as far as I get.  Can anyone help?  Thanks

    I don't know since I don't share anything. You'll have to peruse the help files and check the permissions and ACLs on the Shared folder. According to the permissions on the Shared folder everyone can R&W. If you want those to be inherited by everything dropped into the folder, add an ACL for
    everyone allow read, write
    Details in the manpage for chmod. The actual steps are left as an exercise.

  • APO /SAPAPO/MAT1 Authorization with check based on SNP planner

    Hello,
    We want to maintain authorization profile enabling to have a filter on /SAPAPO/MAT1 based on the value of the SNP Planner.
    Standard transaction PFCG does not brings back the SNP Planner as being a checked object when using /SAPAPO/MAT1 in the menu
    So, I used transaction SU24 and changed the setting for /SAPAPO/MAT1 : I added the authorization object C_APO_PLNR SNP Planner with check indicator "Check" and proposal "YS" . The status is now green for this object but I do not have understood if I had also to maintain TSTCA column "status: check at transaction start". In any case, I did not found how to activate it.
    With this setting, I also competed with PFCG the required value for SNP Planner.
    Result: it does not work. Could some one help ?
    Regards,
    Christine

    Hi Christine
    Please check OSS Note 1464451 (Authorisations in APO Master Data). I dont think you can directly use SNP Planner as a basis for authorization without an enhancement.
    RIshi Menon

  • The task completed with an exit code of (1)

    Window 2003 scheduled task Log: The task completed with an exit code of (1). Result=0x1 .Please Help

    Hi,
    Can you run the batch File into the CMD on Window 2003? Exit Code 1 implies that there is a script error, suggested to check the commands and the syntax are correct and the scripts deal with any error condition.
    You could refer to the thread below to troubleshoot the issue:
    Getting error in Task scheduler - 0x1
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/4919181c-6b5a-4c75-ab56-0ace3d987837/getting-error-in-task-scheduler-0x1?forum=ITCG
    Scheduled task error 0x1 - Windows Server 2003 R2
    http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/9af979f6-796a-4ec0-a244-4e491f9a8b86/scheduled-task-error-0x1-windows-server-2003-r2?forum=winserverManagement
    Regards,
    Mandy
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • How do we check a previous release BI Beans Catlog is installed ?

    Hi All,
    How do we check a previous release BI Beans Catlog is installed ? If it exist how to find its version and what are the steps to update it .
    Please guide me
    Thanks
    ViSHAL

    thank you kindly for your answer Annand, however my other two questions remain un-answered.
    1. where do we go to check the vesrion of business contents installed and the cubes and BI objects. how can i show the customer that 3.x contents are not installed.
    2. how can i load data with master and trans in one table without using 3.x flexible update.
    3. even if we use 3.x flexible update, are we compromising some BI 7.0 capabilities, can we say, when using 3.x flexible update method,  that we are still using BI 7.0 technology.
    Thanks.

  • UWL - Default buttons on User decision with note

    Hello!!
    I have configured a decision item from a decision task to set the user decision with note.
    My decision task has 2 decision options (accept is"Validar gasto" and reject is "Devolver gasto para correccion"), but when an item for this task comes, only is displayed two buttons with the text "Decision".
    This is the configuration file:
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <!DOCTYPE UWLConfiguration PUBLIC '-//SAP//UWL1.0//EN' 'uwl_configuration.dtd'
      >
    <UWLConfiguration version="1.0">
      <ItemTypes>
        <ItemType name="uwl.task.webflow.decision.TS99701053.SAP_ECC_HumanResources" connector="WebFlowConnector" defaultView="DefaultView" defaultAction="viewDetail" executionMode="default">
          <ItemTypeCriteria systemId="SAP_ECC_HumanResources" externalType="TS99701053" connector="WebFlowConnector"/>
           <Actions>
            <Action name="accept" groupAction="yes" handler="UserDecisionHandler" returnToDetailViewAllowed="yes" launchInNewWindow="no" referenceBundle="Validar_gasto">
              <Properties>
                <Property name="decisionKey" value="1"/>
                <Property name="UserDecisionNote" value="true"/>
              </Properties>
              <Descriptions default="Aceptar"/>     
             </Action>
            <Action name="reject" groupAction="yes" handler="UserDecisionHandler" returnToDetailViewAllowed="yes" launchInNewWindow="no" referenceBundle="Devolver_gasto_para_correccion">
              <Properties>     
                <Property name="decisionKey" value="2"/>
                <Property name="UserDecisionNote" value="mandatory"/>
              </Properties>
              <Descriptions default="Rechazar"/>
             </Action>
           </Actions>
        </ItemType>
      </ItemTypes>
    </UWLConfiguration>
    Somebody knows how can I change the text of the buttons?
    Is very urgent, please.
    Helpful answers will be rewarded.
    Thanks and regards,
    Manuel.

    I think what Karri means (or should mean ,-) is that there could be a translation issue here - and I agree with that. The texts are most likely generated in the language of the user who creates the work item. If this is not Spanish (I assume that's your logon and development language) you will not get the correct texts. So you will either need to change the logon language of the user, or translate the workflow's texts. I would recommend translation, because you never know when someone might log on in a different language than the system default. It has been known to happen.

  • FD32 checks authorisation for all company codes.

    A User is authorised for his own company code (B) and credit control area (B).  Customer master is common for a and b companies.  When trying to maintain FD32 for common customer for company B, system is checking authorisation for A and returning an error message No authorization for analyzing accounts in company code A. For information we are on EC6.

    It would be just a warning message.
    Have you tried with a Customer who is only created in Company B? Probably in this case system will not display any messages.
    As your Customer is common for both Company Codes, system gives a message.
    Hope this helps, 
    Thanks,
    Jignesh Mehta

  • Error in SRM:  a user with enough authorisation level is miss

    Hello,
    We are on SRM 5.0 and our users get the following error in SRM when creating a shopping cart:
    No user assigned to object a user with enough authorisation level is missing.
    Anybody any idea ?
    Thanks as ever

    Hello Can anybody helpe me please ?

  • Error while adding a new col with check constriant

    Hello
    I tried adding a new column with check constraint but giving the error please correct me..
    drop table testchk
    create table testchk(typenm varchar2(5))
    insert into testchk values('mon')
    alter table testchk add typechk varchar2(5) default 'both' constraint chk_test check(typechk in('m','d') and typechk is not null)For the alter comman getting the ORA-02293 cannot validate error..
    I dont want to create any other constriant like not null etc .. but need only one check constriant
    Thanks

    You cannot assign a default value = 'both' while the constraint allows only 'm' or 'd'.
    This will work:
    ALTER TABLE testchk ADD typechk VARCHAR2(5) DEFAULT 'both'
    CONSTRAINT chk_test CHECK(typechk IN('m','d', 'both') AND typechk IS NOT NULL);Edited by: kordirko on 2010-05-14 18:41

Maybe you are looking for