Task Search in Group Queue

Hi,
I am trying to provide search facility to the users using the search templates. The task are assigned to a group "Reviewers". All of the reviewers can see  the task in the group queue that appears left to the to-do list.
I have created a search templates and its work fine with the tasks in the To- Do list. but it is not working for the group. Do i have to do some settings in the workflow, task ACL etc?
Regards,
Waqas

Hi Jasmin,
Thanks for your reply. What is the use of search templates? only searching tasks in the To-Do list or in tracking list.
Is there a workaround to this problem? By Task sharing ? Customizing task ACL?
I want to allow users to seach the task that are in the group queue. I was checking the ACL in the User Action. if i am assigning any user to it then he can search the task.
I am thinking to create some custom component that will allow users in that group to have access to the task using APIs. Can you please help me on this because this is very a critical requirement from our client.
Regards,
Waqas

Similar Messages

  • In human task, dynamically assign group doesn't work

    Oracle SOA 11.1.1.4
    My bpel process invokes a human task.
    On the human task Assignment tab, I assigned 3 users (by name), 1 group (by expression).
    The group is configured in LDAP
    When I tested the bpel process, I entered the group and other data required.
    From the worklist app, I see the task listed. It is assigned to the 3 users, but not the dynamically passed-in group.
    From the Audit trail, I saw all data I entered (include the group). Everything seems correct, but I still can’t make the dynamically-pass-group work.
    If I assign the group by name in human task, it works fine.
    The problem is: dynamically assign group doesn't work.
    Please kindly advice.

    Yes, it is possible assign a group as participant of some human task, passing the group name as parameter.
    I have tested just now.
    It works pretty well in SOA 11.1.1.4 (BPEL or BPM).
    Make sure add a data parameter in your human task definition and pass a valid group name to it.
    At the Assignment tab, in the participants' list, add a group, data type by expression, and set the value to the right xpath expression to the corresponding parameter.
    For example: /task:task/task:payload/task:group
    If it is not working look the SOA log files, probably you'll find some information about the error there. Maybe there is some problem with your jazn.com configuration.
    You can also test if there is something wrong related to the group name, trying to transfer some task to the same group by the worklist.

  • Assigning Task to a Group of people not to just one person through staffing

    We have a requirement of assigning a task to a group (team) rather than assiging to just one person.
    In cprojects according to the standard we create the BP for a person, then assign the task in cprojects using this BP number. This would be done if we have the role as EMPLOYEE.
    If we  want the task to be assigned to a group (team) so that the task can be picked by any person in that team ,is there any configration in the BP number or is there any thing we need to do in cprojects?
    As soon as the task gets released we need the tasks to be appearing in all the tasks dashboards of all the people. As soon as the task is completed we want the task to go away from all the dashboards. That means there should be a connection bewteen the team and the individuals on the team.
    Should we be creating a BP number for the team and then assign the individual BP numbers of the people to this Team BP?
    Please help me out in this.
    Please let me know if you need more information on the same.
    I knwo this can be done by manually staffing all the people to the role in cprojects, but this is a very cumbersome process.
    thanks
    DPK

    Hi Niranjan ,
    Thank you for the answer this might help me out.
    I will ask my developer to help me out in the same.
    Can you please let me know why we need the seperate UI to be developed?
    1) When we link the BP which represents the Team, what Role iN BP transaction should i assign it to? Should this BP be a person BP or a Organization BP or a Group BP?
    2) once i have Ztable in which i map the entries, all we need to do is to write a piece of code that when ever the task with the Team BP is released, check for this table and pick up all the other EMPLOYEE role based BP and connect them so that the tasks appear in all these task dashboards. Right?
    Thanks for the help.
    thanks
    Pavan

  • [Forum FAQ] The Value drop down list is grayed out when you perform search for Group Policy Objects in GPMC

    Symptom
    On Windows Server 2012 or Windows Server 2012 R2, when you use the Search for Group Policy Objects feature in GPMC, the “Value” field is not populated when you choose “User Configuration” as the Search Item. (See Figure 1.)
    <Figure 1>
    Cause
    The happens because the  Data of the (Default) value of the following Registry Key is not correct.
    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon\GPExtensions\{4D2F9B6F-1E52-4711-A382-6A8B1A003DE6}]
    By default the Data is (value not set). (see Figure 2)
    <Figure 2>
    Resolution
    The registry keys under [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon\GPExtensions] are the Group Policy Preference Client Side Extensions. The CSE name of the GUID {4D2F9B6F-1E52-4711-A382-6A8B1A003DE6} is
    RemoteApp and Desktop Connections. Please follow the steps below to resolve the issue.
    1. Locate the registry key: [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Winlogon\GPExtensions\{4D2F9B6F-1E52-4711-A382-6A8B1A003DE6}]
    2. Take the ownership of this key: Right click on the registry key and choose Permissions option and click the Advanced button on the dialogue window. Then on the Advanced Security Settings dialogue window, click Change button to take the ownership
    of the key for the current logon account and make the current logon account Full Control permission with the registry key. (See Figure 3.)
    <Figure 3> 
    3. Change the data of (Default) value from "(value not set)" to
    "RemoteApp and Desktop Connection Component". (See Figure 4)
    <Figure 4>
    4. Once the steps above are completed, the Value drop down list will be populated again when you perform Search in GPMC. (See Figure 5)
    <figure 5>
    This article has been created as a TechNet Wiki
    here.
    Please click to vote if the post helps you. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread.

    thanks for the tip - but you should create this as a wiki article as it will be easier to reference in the future
    Regards,
    Denis Cooper
    MCITP EA - MCT
    Help keep the forums tidy, if this has helped please mark it as an answer
    My Blog
    LinkedIn:

  • Add Opportunity status fld to task search

    Hi Experts,
    I have a requirement of adding Opportunity status field only fto Task search.How can i do that?In Standard search for activities provided by SAP it hasOpportunity Id and Name,Please let me know end to end details what I need to do,which structure to append and where to build logic and all.
    Regards,
    Mehul

    <Action id='1' name='Put result in this task'>
              <ActionResult name='timeout'>
                    <s>Put your text here.</s>
              </ActionResult>
    <Action>Edited by: thomasl on Dec 20, 2007 9:11 PM

  • Related to Process task assignment to Group

    Hi,
    I have one RO : for eg. Laptop
    Process definition for this task and in process definition I have added one process task create user ..
    and I am asigning this task to One Group.
    But that approval request goes to xelsysadm instead of group member.
    why is it so?

    I think you are confused between approval process and provisioning process.
    You have to assign the task to the required group in approval process.
    Since your approval request is going to xelsysadm i am assuming you have standard approval process.
    Assign the task in standard approval process to your group and the approval will go to your group.
    Hope this helps,
    Sagar

  • Avoid Duplicate Tasks when Expanding Groups for Custom Task Process

    Is there a way to:
    Avoid Duplicate Tasks when Expanding Groups for Custom Task Process?
    I've got a people metadata column that I am planning on putting groups into.  I want the groups to expand and send a task for all users in the groups.  I also want to avoid creating multiple tasks if a user happens to be in two groups at the same
    time.
    I'm trying to work out a way to assign users a read task based on job training requirements.  Right now assigning groups and using a workflow task to confirm read is what I'm trying to accomplish.  I just end up getting two tasks for a user if
    their in multiple groups.
    David Jenkins

    Hi David,
    Please verify the followings:
    After Participants, select Parallel(all at a once)
    Expand Task Options, select ‘Assign a task to each member within groups’
    Open the action properties, make sure ExpandGroup is Yes
    Also in SharePoint Designer ,you can edit the property for the Start Approval Porcess to enable ExpandGroup:
    Reference:
    https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US/d14da1c4-bd5a-459b-8698-3a89bb01e6ad/expand-groupnot-creating-tasks-for-users-issue-in-sharepoint-2013-designer-workflow?forum=sharepointgeneral
    https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/office/en-US/ac245d45-ff66-4341-815c-79213efc4394/sharepoint-2010-designer-workflows-and-sharepoint-user-groups?forum=sharepointcustomizationprevious
    Best Regards,
    Eric
    TechNet Community Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
    [email protected]

  • Create Tasks for target group.

    Hi guys.
    I want craete Tasks for target group.
    But, I don`t see "Employee Responsible" in "Create Business Transactions for Target Group Members".
    How can I set Employee Responsible for Tasks?
    Thanks.
    Sergey.

    Hi Sergey,
    What i observed while creating Task from TG is we dont have fileds from where we can assign Emp responsible, as in Task Partner detemination(Standard) Access sequence we use for Emp responsible is User, and when we create Task from TG sytem takes User's Id as a Emp reponsible i.e. using which user u r creating Task from TG.
    Regards,
    DD's

  • GPP Scheduled Task Fails in Group Policy Modeling depending on DC

    We have multiple domain controllers running at a 2003 functional level.
    We have 1 DC running Server 2003 x86 SP2 and the rest run Server 2008 (maybe R2)
    I created a GPO that includes a Scheduled Task Group Policy Preference under Computer Configuration.
    In order to test this I used Group Policy Modeling in the GPMC on a 2008 R2 Machine where I am editing Group Policy.
    If I run the modeling (perform the simulation on the 2003 DC it fails. (Note I am modeling the GPO for a different computer, not the 2003 SP2 DC, I am running the modeling for a Workstation)
    Information from the Component Status on the Summary Tab of the Modeling Report
    Component Name Status 
    Group Policy Infrastructure Success 
    EFS recovery Success (no data) 
    Group Policy Scheduled Tasks Failed 
    Group Policy Scheduled Tasks failed due to the error listed below and failed to log resultant set of policy information.
    Additional information may have been logged. Review the application event log on the domain controller on which the simulation was run for events between 2/28/2014 10:07:36 AM and 2/28/2014 10:07:36 AM. 
    Registry Success 
    Security Success 
    Info on the Settings Tab of the Modeling Report below.
    An error has occurred while collecting data for Scheduled Tasks.
    The following errors were encountered: 
    An unknown error occurred while data was gathered for this extension. Details: Invalid class  
    If I run the modeling using a 2008 DC to perform the simulation it works fine.
    Per the instructions on the Summary Tab regarding the scheduled task failure I look at the event log on the 2003 domain controller and this is what i find.
    The event I get on the 2003 DC is 8196 and I will place the details below.
    Event Type:   Error
    Event Source:           Group Policy Scheduled Tasks
    Event Category:        Disk
    Event ID:       8196
    Date:              2/27/2014
    Time:             4:48:47 PM
    User:              NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM
    Computer:     <computername>
    Description:
    The client-side extension caught the unhandled exception '0xC0000005' inside: 'threadEntry : client main' See trace file for more details. For more information, see Help and Support Center at http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/events.asp.
    So, should I be concerned that this is failing on the 2003 DC, does this mean that if my workstations authenticate to my 2003 DC that the preference will not process?
    I was reading that in 2003 client side extensions were not there and can be installed, would this make the modeling succeed?
    How do I get verified, I tried to post screenshots, but I could not. :(

    Hi Jonathan,
    As you have found the reason, I want to confirm whether the issue has been fixed.
    In fact, for Windows Server 2003 to apply or process Group Policy Preferences settings, we must install client-side extensions of GPP for Windows Server 2003.
    Although this is not related to this case, for your information, if our clients are Windows XP or Windows Vista, to use GPP, we must install client-side extensions for these
    workstations respectively.
    Regarding GPP, the following article can be referred to for more information.
    Group Policy Preferences Getting Started Guide
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc731892(v=WS.10).aspx
    Best regards,
    Frank Shen

  • Sharepoint 2013 custom search results grouping display template

    Hi,
    I am trying to implement custom grouping for search result items. I would like to group them by a managed property, but without using result blocks (query rules). The idea is to sort the results by the property and then compare the current item (ctx.CurrentItem)
    with the previous item using ctx.CurrentItem.ParentTableReference. If a new property value is detected we insert a new 'group header' (just some simple html). The problem is the ParentTableReference is undefined. Shouldn't there be such a property in current
    item object?
    I'm implementing this in a custom search result item display template...
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    According to your post, my understanding is that you want to customize search result items display template.
    I suggest you get enumerate all properties of JavaScript context object and debug you code to watch the
    ctx.CurrentItem object.
    The following articles for your reference:
    Debugging Display Templates in SharePoint 2013 Search
    http://powersearching.wordpress.com/2013/01/25/debugging-display-temlates-in-sharepoint-2013-search/
    Enumerate all properties of JavaScript context object in display templates in SharePoint 2013
    http://sadomovalex.blogspot.co.uk/2013/06/enumerate-all-properties-of-javascript.html
    How to Define a Custom Group Display Template (GroupTemplateId) for the Search Results WebPart via JavaScript
    http://www.eliostruyf.com/how-to-define-a-custom-group-display-template-for-the-search-results-webpart-via-javascript/
    Creating customized search results in SharePoint 2013
    http://www.abelsolutions.com/totm/creating-customized-search-results-in-sharepoint-2013/
    Best Regards
    Dennis Guo
    TechNet Community Support

  • Searching 'parent' group for member of 'sub group'

    Running XI 3.1 using Windows AD SSO .   BOE group 'Report users' contains Windows AD subgroup '<domainname\groupname>'.  In CMC searching for an individual user from parent BOE group 'Report users' search returns nothing.  When searching 'User list' the user is returned.  When searching Windows AD subgroup '<domainname\groupname>' directly the user is returned.
    Is there a way to search for an individual from the parent BOE group level?
    Thanks in advance for any info.

    members of a sub groups will not display in the parent unless you copy them to the parent. This is by design. The reason nothing returns is because they aren't actually members. But since they belong to a sub group that is a member then they will inherit permissions from the parent. This is usually why everything gets set up this way.
    There may be a complex query that you can try with query builder to pull both group members and sub group members. Best to check in the [SDK forums|/community [original link is broken]; for that.
    Regards,
    Tim

  • Where to search for  R3A* queues in status SYSFAIL in my system.

    Hi Experts,
    Can anyone tell me in which Tcode or table I can search for the below entries. I am trying to find out these entries  as one of  CRM team member had mentioned the below one.
    R3A* queues in status SYSFAIL were detected in your system. As a result, changes in the R/3 system have not been updated in the CRM system.
    Regards
    Srujan K

    Hi Muthu,
    Can you please tell me what are these Queues belong to, meaning which is repsonsible for what in SRM?
    R3AD_ATTRIBUTE
    R3AD_CLASS
    R3AD_CUSTOME0000000043
    Do we as an SRM consultant have to monitor the SMQR queues also?
    please clarify me on the above 2 points.
    Thanks in Advance!!!
    Regards,
    Srujank

  • How to cancel task which are in Queue state in SCOM console?

    Hi All,
    When I start any task it does not execute. It show task is in queue state. How can I cancel or execute this task?
    Thanks

    To cancel Task, you can use following steps:
    In the Monitoring workspace, expand Operations Manager and then expand
    Agent Details.
    Click Agent Health State.
    In Agent State, click an agent.
    In the Tasks pane, click Flush Health Service State and Cache.
    Please remember, if you see a post that helped you please click "Vote As Helpful" and if it answered your question, please click "Mark As Answer"

  • Enable Safe Search in Group Policy

    We ran across an issue where if a Student typed xxx in the Google Search and then click images, they are submitted to more than an eye full of inappropriate images.  We have the "Safe Search" enabled on our Sonic Wall, but that still does
    not stop the images. 
    Is there any setting within Group Policy we can set to push out enabling Safe Search on all the Computers within the Network?  Or if anyone has a great idea of how to block these websites?
    Thank you.

    Hi,
    Based on your description, I agree with Zanderol24 that the third party product should be able to help us in this situation. However, for this is a Microsoft forum, we don't support third party product here, and it's recommended that we contact vendor support
    to ask for advice.
    If we are using IE, we can choose to use IEAK to manage IE settings.
    Regarding IEAK, the following article can be referred to for more information.
    Internet Explorer Administration Kit (IEAK) Information and Downloads
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-in/ie/bb219517.aspx
    Besides, we can also try to configure a dummy proxy in Group Policy Preferences Internet Settings item to block websites for IE 10 or above, but GPP settings can be manually edited by users after the settings get applied. If our IE versions
    are below IE 10, we can use IEM to block websites.
    TechNet Subscriber Support
    If you are TechNet Subscription user and have any feedback on our support quality, please send your feedback here.
    Best regards,
    Frank Shen

  • Limited searching on Group share, can't automount

    Hi, OS X Server newbie here, but I'm starting to get a decent feel of how things work.
    I have set up OD and the client computers up with mobile accounts that store their home directory locally but still allow authentication. I lumped the appropriate users into a group, say "officegroup", with their own share, /Groups/officegroup.
    Now, once clients log in to their workstation, I cannot get the group share to automount. To access it I have to go through Finder, enter the username and password, and it works fine. I thought that upon login, authentication would be good to go to access other services and the user would not have to enter their username and password in again. I've checked DNS (dig, dig -x, -checkhostname, etc.), and everything checks out fine and says that it's all being resolved correctly. So, what am I missing?
    Second, it seems that searching is limited in the group share. If I search for something, only folders come up, but no files. Spotlight is enabled on the share, I've rebuilt the indexes with mdutil, but nothing changes. Any ideas?
    Thanks,
    Nate

    I wanted to write what I found out in hopes of helping someone else who uses OS X Server and isn't as experienced as some people who contribute here. When I upgraded to 10.4, I was using Netinfo domain and Open Directory to bind my clients to the server. In WGM I had to authenticate to LDAP, for reasons I still don't completely understand. I wasn't however, correctly using LDAP for authentication across my network.
    I used Server Admin to migrate my Netinfo domain to LDAP in Open Directory. Then I turned on DHCP in OS X Server and turned off DHCP on my router. Then I used DIrectory Access to configure LDAP to use DHCP-supplied addresses and added an entry for my server. I disabled Netinfo on each client once I verified that this worked.
    Once this was done the automounts showed up in the correct location as specified in WGM. And no, you don't have to create the folders on the client machines. In addition, my authentication for my users has been fixed to use LDAP properly (well, at least as far as I can tell at this point).
    All of this info is in the Open Directory and Authentication Manual. The lesson I learned is that the OD stuff has to be properly configured otherwise services that depend on it will not perform quite right. What's scary is that I used this half-baked configuration since I installed Tiger a long time ago. I run a simple server-based enironment in my house, so I never picked up on the inconsistency.

Maybe you are looking for