Tax cond types are different in SD & FI

Dear All
One thing I am not able to understand..
Tax cond type which I define in FI, I am not able to see in SD. Here is the path in FI
SPRO-->FINANCIAL ACCOUITNG > FINANCIAL ACCOUTING GLOBAL SETTINGS->TAX ON SALES/PURCHASES>BASIC SETTINGS-> define cond type
Whereas I define cond type in SD, path is
SPRO --> Sales & Distribution --> Basic Functions --> Pricing --> Define cond type.
at both places cond type do not matches and this causes error in billing doc and accounting doc is not generated.
Can any body help.
Regards
Neeraj Jain

Hi SJ
First of all thanks for answering me.
When I try to release the invoice for Accounting, I get t he error message.
Tax code  in procedure ZTAXIN is invalid
Message no. FICORE704
Diagnosis
The tax code entered is not defined in the country for this company code.
System Response
Procedure
Check and, if necessary, correct the entry.
Procedure for System Administration
If it is not an input error, check and possibly change the system settings.
To do this, choose Maintain entries (F5).
1. Check whether the required tax determination procedure is assigned to the relevant country. the Procedure field is in the detail screen.
2. Create a new tax code if required.
The above one is error message.
Regards
Neeraj Jain

Similar Messages

  • Tax cond types in pricing  proce

    hi friends
    i am created pri pro like this
    step  contype        from     to     con rec
    10     pr00                               1000
    20     k007                               10%
    30     sub toatal      10     20
    40     kf00                               400
    50      g total          30    40        
    actual result shoud come 1000100=1100400=1500
    but my result is 1000100=1100400=1100        
    but my result is 1100 . frieght value 400 is taking into consideration
    what is the problem please explain

    Condition Type:
    Every element of pricing is called a Condition Type.
    Every Condition Type / Element will have a standard Technical Name.
    Few Standard Condition Types are:
    PR00 - STANDARD PRICE
    KA00 - SALES DEAL with DISCOUNT
    KF00 - FRIGHT
    T.Code V/06 is used to define the Condition Types.
    There are around 256 condition types given by the Standard SAP System.
    For our pricing configuration we can choose our own condition type from the list. In case a condition type does not match the requirement then we can copy the condition type and modify according to the requirement.
    values are maintained for eveey condition type. i.e. condition records are maintained for condition types inside the condition table.
    Pricing Procedure
    simple pricing procedue
    Reward points if useful.

  • Output types are different in VF02 than in VF03 (A particular output type Z*** does not appear in VF03)

    Hi Experts,
    When I check the billing document (Go to>Header>Output) there are 3 output types. After executing VF02, an output type is added (EDI). Why does this particular output type (Z***) not appear in VF03?
    - What are the related configurations for this?
    - Is this a possible ABAP issue? To my knowledge, custom programs usually do not result to this kind of behavior.
    Thanks in advanced,
    Jack

    Jack Rockefeller wrote:
    I'm not a functional consultant but an ABAP consultant.
    Ah, OK, that explains it. Jack, I'm sorry but it's not quite feasible to explain the whole output determination configuraton in a discussion post. Here is a wiki page if you have some time for reading. It's not very thorough but you could google for more. But it would be more efficient to just ask an SD consultant.
    Also in VF02 look at the Output Determination analysis (it's somewhere in the menu in the Output screen) and see if it makes any sense to you.

  • If same file name but file types are different, we should get only particular file type in search results.

    Hi Team,
    If filename is same for .doc and .pdf, only .pdf file should come in search results. For example, Attendee.doc, Attendee.pdf are available, we should get only .pdf in the search
    results.
    Please help us on this how to achieve.
    Thanks,
    Manjeera

    Hi Manjeera,
    I think you should use KQL / Managed properties, refer these links for more information -
    use Property restriction queries in KQL and set filetype:pdf
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ee558911.aspx
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/ff394509(v=office.14).aspx
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj219630.aspx
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/nadeemis/archive/2012/08/24/sharepoint-2013-search-rest-api.aspx
    and these links -
    Configure result sources for search in SharePoint Server 2013
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/jj683115.aspx
    How To Customize SharePoint 2013 Search Results Using Query Rules and Result Sources
    http://blogs.technet.com/b/mspfe/archive/2013/02/01/how-query-rules-and-result-sources-can-be-used-to-customize-search-results.aspx
    Hope this helps!
    MCITP: SharePoint 2010 Administrator
    MCTS - MOSS 2007 Configuring, .NET 2.0
    | SharePoint Architect | Evangelist |
    http://www.sharepointdeveloper.in/
    http://ramakrishnaraja.blogspot.com/

  • Same Condition type with different G/L Accounts

    Dear All,
    Our customer wants to maintain different set of G/L accounts with the same condition types in case of Service tax.
    We have three different condition types for Service taxes.
    JSV4 - Service tax
    JES4 - ECS on Service tax
    JSE5 - SECS on Service tax
    We have Two different Services
    1. R & D Services
    2. IT Services
    For these two services, service tax condition types are common but we need different G/L Accounts for different Services.
    How to achieve this?
    Regards,
    Mullairaja

    Create two tax codes in FTXP, one for R&D Service and another one for IT Services.
    Now go to OB40, select the required Transaction, say for example MWS and assign these tax codes with the required G/L Account there.
    Finally, in VK11, for tax condition type, assign these tax codes and save.
    Now do one sales cycle for each scenario and update the forum.
    thanks
    G. Lakshmipathi

  • Different Transaction Types for Different Depreciation Areas

    Dear Friends,
    When I am viewing the asset explorer for the asset, it is oberved that for book derpreciation 01, the asset transaction type "acquisition value" is updated and am able to view the same.
    However when I am going through the tax depreciation area, the transaction type intercompany transfer" got updated and the acquisition values are not updated.
    I would like know the reason of how the system is going to update different transaction types in different depreciation areas since the postings only takes effect in book depreciation and same should be diplayed for tax depreciation.
    Thanks in advance!

    hi
    go to OAYA
    select        "Limit Transaction Types to Depreciation Areas"
    select the trnsaction type you using .
    select depreciation area specification
    and maintain entries for every dep area you want to maintain for transaction type.
    regards

  • My zagg key board connects but the keys I type either don't type character, type 2 characters that are different when I hit only 1 key, or doesn't type at all. Is there a way to reset zagg keyboard to factory settings?

    My zagg key board connects but the keys I type either don't type character, type 2 characters that are different when I hit only 1 key, or doesn't type at all. Is there a way to reset zagg keyboard to factory settings?

    Recharging is a good thing to try. They do start to act odd when the battery gets low. Beyond that, just like Tom says, contact Zagg. I have one of their keyboards and the company has wonderful customer service.

  • What are different vru types and their functions

              Dear experts,
    what are different vru types and their functions       

    Hi,
    just hit the Help button in "Network VRU Explorer" in ICM Configuration Manager.
    If you wish to see even more details, take a look at the following article:
    http://www.ciscopress.com/articles/article.asp?p=1822061&seqNum=2
    HTH
    G.

  • Interfaces casts are type-checked differently to class casts?

    hi,
    this is a multipost of
    http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=677488&tstart=0
    as i'm hoping some compiler guys are hanging around in here :)
    I'm just wondering why interfaces are type-checked differently to class casts when casting between siblings in the inheritance hierarchy.
    e.g. casting a String to an Integer fails, but declaring
    interface IString {
       String toUpperCase();
    interface IInteger {
       int intValue();
    } and casting between IString and IInteger works fine?
    any help appreciated,
    thanks,
    asjf

    Unless you have specific memory usage requirements so that you must use arrays, just use a java.util.List:
    public abstract class Type<A extends Arg> {
        protected abstract List<A> method();
       // or if the only needs to read it can be more convenient to have
        protected abstract List<? extends A> method2();
    public class Sub extends Type<SubArgs> {
        protected List<SubArgs> method() { ... }
        // sub class can be more specific for method2 if it wants to
        protected List<SubArgs> method2() { ... }
    }

  • VAT & CST Cond Types

    D/ Friends,
    I want 2 config a sample scenario. I've 4 plants situated in 4 different states:
    Plant 1 in State 1
    Plant 2 in State 2
    Plant 3 in State 3
    Plant 4 in State 4
    Now, in the Calculation schema, I want to config 2 condition types, one for VAT & other for CST as follows:
    If material is purchased for Plant 1 from State 1 VAT is applicable- VAT Cond. Typ
    If material is purchased for Plant 1 from the State other than State 1 CST is applicable- CST Cond Typ
    Similarly if mat is purchased for Plant 2 from State 2- VAT is applicable & from othe state- CST. Both the condition types are to be maintained in the calculation sshema & both the Cond. Types are to be maintained for all the Plants in the same way as above. Plz tell the complete config right from the conditon table to condition record. Assume that no excise is involved as the plants are just assembling units.
    Thank you.

    Hi,
    Condition Type in TAX Procedure are plant indepenedent.
    Make different Tax Code as per the requirement for
    VAT   - JVRN    -  VAT Non Deductable
                 JVRD   - VAT Deductable
    CST  - JIPC
    Go to FTXP create New Tax Code
    After that Go FV12 to assigen % for the Condition for that particular Tax Code.
    Hope Help U !
    Regards,
    Pardeep Malik

  • Condition value of Tax condition type gets added to Total Value in Contract

    Hi All,
    I'm currently investigating an issue where there are 2 line items in an SAP Sales Contract. There is a human error in the second line where the billing end date is less than billing start date in the billing plan.  Consequently, the second line has null Outgoing target value.
    However, the header Total value in the Contract  gets wrongly calculated as Basic condition value of 1st line  + Condition value of tax condition type of line one due to this.   When I modify the billing end date for the second line item to be a date greater than the billing start date, the above problem disappears and the total value of the contract does not include the tax component.
    For eg.
    Normal Error free  Contract
    Total Value at Header =   700.00 EUR
                       Material          Outgoing Target val
    Item 0010    MAT1               450.00                          ( 450 + 50 (tax )  )
    Item 0020    MAT2               150.00   
    Contract with billing plan error in second line
    Total value at Header =   550.00 EUR 
                            MAterial       Outgoing target val          
    Item 0010         MAT1             450.00                    ( 450 + 50 (tax ) )
    Item 0020         MAT2              0.00         
    Any inputs would be most welcome.
    Regards,
    Venkatesh.
    Edited by: Venkatesh Gopalarathnam on Jan 24, 2012 9:48 AM

    No, i didn't.
    Actually, i enter condition type and amount in sales order manually.
    At that time my program which i modified at 'Define And Assign Pricing Procedures' in IMG should be run. 
    But the result of running is different from my purpose.
    To change Condition value of condition type in sales order, are there any solution?

  • Error through F-44 that  Consolidated  companies 1000 and ' ' are different

    Dear Expert
    At the time of Vendor clearing through F-44 I get the
    warning message that "Withholding tax information ignored"
    where Withholding tax related customization and master has
    been updated accordingly. If I ignore the same warning
    and save the document as my all Debit and Credit transactions
    are of equal amount ,i m getting the error that "Consolidated
    companies 1000 and ' ' are different.
    What specific setting is required for the same.
    Thanks in advance
    VG

    Hi,
    If you are getting error F5 080 then most probably this is because one of the documents to be cleared contains a different trading partner (field BSEG-VBUND).
    Please check the contents of each customer/vendor line item concerning this field. The field can be viewed on the customer/vendor line item via button 'more data'. If the contents is different you have either to clear the items individually or you have to change the settings of the document type used for clearing.  You can find out what document type is used for clearing in OBXH in the 'transfer with postings section'.  Afterwards you can go to OBA7 and mark the flags 'Inter-company postings' and 'Enter trading partner'.
    I hope this helps.
    Regards
    Ravinagh Boni

  • Purchase order print priview and spool print output are different.

    Hi Friends,
    there is problem with purchase order print priview and spool print output are different.
    mean : in me23n .. for a perticular po .. in po priview the TAX VALUES value is 120 coming..
    when i am giving print with spool.. the amount value is showing  TAX VALUE
    is 443..why it is showing wrong..
    this is for perticular output type.
    why TAX VALUES are showing different in print view and
    spool print.
    help me.
    regards,

    Hi Neil,
    thanks for your reply.
    but the valiadtions are happening in standard functional module PRICING.
    it is realted script(medruck)...but there is no code point for spool or printer side..
    and the issue is realted one PO OUTPUT TYPE..
    it is sap standard debugging... when i am debugging the functional module PRICING.
    the values are coming dynammically.
    help me.
    regards,

  • Service tax condition types in Pricing Procedure in SD(Taxinn)

    I need one more advice on Service tax.
    I am configuring order type for services.In that in pricing I have to add the service tax conditions type for service tax & cess on that.We do not have any standard condition type in our pricing procedure for services.
    Is there any standard SAP doc. to configure service tax condition types in pricing procedure or I have to copy from JLST & JLSR(surcharge).What about the account keys I will used for these condition types.
    If you have any doc. related to this issue please send it to me....or suggest me what to do.
    Please remeber I am using TaxINN tax procedure.
    Please help me
    Thanks & Regards
    Sunil Garg

    PROCEDURE: Initial Steps
    Create two new Tax conditions: JSE4, JES4. Steps for creation of Tax Condition is illustrated below
    Create new condition types
    SAP Standard IMG -> Financial Accounting -> Financial Accounting Global Settings -> Tax on Sales/Purchases -> Basic Settings -> Check Calculation Procedure. (Transaction OBYZ)
    Select ‘Define Condition Types’
    Select Condition Type JIN1 and Click on Copy as (F6) and give the Condition type as JSE4 and the Name as “Service Tax”.
    Select Condition Type JIN5 and Click on Copy as (F6) and give the Condition type as JES4 and the Name as “ECS on Service Tax”.
    Outcome: The two tax conditions, one for Service Tax and the second for Education Cess on Service Tax have now been created.
    1.     Create a new tax posting key VS9 and VS0. 
    The path for this is:
    SPRO &#61664; Financial Accounting &#61664; Financial Accounting Global Settings &#61664; Tax on Sales/Purchases &#61664; Basic Settings &#61664; Check and Change Settings for Tax Processing
    Select the Processing Key MW1 and Click on Copy as (F6) and give the Key as VS9 and Name as ‘India Service Tax’.
    Select the Processing Key MW1 and Click on Copy as (F6) and give the Key as VS0 and Name as ‘ECS on Service Tax’.
    Note: If there are multiple service tax registration numbers, you need to have separate account posting to different GL accounts based on service registration number. This can be done provided a separate tax code is maintained for each service registration number.
    To achieve this you need to define a set of 2 separate G/L accounts for service tax and Education CESS on service tax respectively, for every service registration number.
    In such a case, please activate multiple accounts posting per tax code as follows:
    Defining the GL accounts for the Service tax and ECS on Service Tax:
    SPRO &#61664; Financial Accounting &#61664; Financial Accounting Global Settings &#61664; Tax on Sales/Purchases &#61664; Posting -> Define Tax accounts
    Go to Details of the Transaction VS9 (Service Tax GL account)  and enter the Chart of accounts…
    Select the Tax Code Check Box if you want to have Tax Code Specific GL accounts or Blank when the common GL accounts…
    Regards,
    Rajesh Banka
    Reward points if helpful.

  • JEXC and JEXS condition types are missing in client.

    Hi All,
    Condition types JEXC and JEXS are missing in 000 client in our present project( Indian Rollout).
    These condition types are required for domestic calculation of conditions.
    Please throw some light on this issue.
    Note:
    One more thing, all J**** conditions and TAXINN calculation schema were missing in sand box.
    So copied the missing objectsfrom 000 client.
    These were identified from functional perspective.
    concern is will this copying client suffice CIN requirents or not.
    With Regards,
    Vijaykumar P

    HI,
    Please check the SAP master note for TAXINN - 952289 with the entire configuration.
    As per the document in this SAP note - you can configure the tax conditions in different clients as per your requirement.
    Thanks & Regards,

Maybe you are looking for