Tax not calculating in MIRO within a date range.

Hi Experts ,
We have created a tax code and assign its values in condition types under two separate Key Combination.
1) Tax Classification : 4% ( Non Validity) , in access sequence exclusive indicator is set aganst it.
2) Tax Code : 4% (Valdity - Sept - till 9999), Exclusive indicator is not set against it.
Issue is that when i create a PO ( at any date) system is picking up the taxes.
Nom at the time of MIRO , if i post the MIRO before sept. system is allowing me to do so and calculate taxes correctly.
But when i change the date to Sept the system does not calculate taxes.
Even though the Tax Classification has more priority in access sequence compared to tax code , i am failed to understand why system is not calculating taxes.
I have tried deleting conditions in tax code key combinations but still system is not calculating taxes in MIRO,
Pls guide.
Regards
Honey

Hi Ramesh ,
i have done the same . Maintained he condition record via FV11. but system is not calculating tax for sept. month in MIRO.
In PO tax calculation is perfect but in MIRO it is not calculating tax.( ticked calculate tax option also).

Similar Messages

Tax not calculating in MIRO

Hi ,
I have created on PO in which system showing exicse and VAT amount.
But while doing MIRO it is not showing any tax and exice even though i selected calculate tax option.
Regards,
Ravindra

Hi,
See the material document whether Tax code assigned or not in MIGO
if assign that untill and unless taxcode not appear in MIRO to book the entry.
Hope if it useful assign points
Regards,
Sankar

Withholding tax not calculating in MIRO and calculating in F-43

Hi,
Whenever I am positng invoice thru F-43, Calculating withholding tax amount and generating seperate line item for that.
But for same vendor after posting MM cycle( PO - GR -MIRO) and I am posting Invoice thru MIRO WHT line item not generating while simulating and also after posting.
Checks done :
1. In vendor master data Liable check box is ticked and Tax codes are properly maintained.
2. Minimun and maximum amounts checked.
3.Base amounts checked.
4. Formula for WHT checked
5. I feel if these setting are not good,it should not post in F-43 also. But it is posting in F-43.
Kinldy tell me any specific setting for calculating the WHT thru transaction MIRO
Thanks in advance

Shankar,
Thanks for reply.
If I don't put amount in the basic data tab( MIRO) then it does not allow to "simulate" or "Post". But here I can simulate and Post
I check every thing in WHT Config but I could't found the solution.
I want to tell another thing, we recently went to patch upgrade from Version 4.7 E SP 22 to 4.7 E SP30.
My question, Is the pacth upgrade affects in anyway???
If any suitable answer appreciatable.
Thanks once again for your reply.

Tax not calculated in MIRO for the condition type JVCD

Hi,
We made some new different tax code and attached with JVCD , its calculating in PO but in MIRO calculation part not done but for other condition type ,JVRD,JVRN system calculating well...
Please tell me some way why not system calculating in case of JVCD and JVCN for capital case..
Thanks in Advance,
Dharmveer

Hi,
We totally agreed with you and already we checked our configuration part is OK.Actually we want to map some process where we captured excise in GR but no need to take credit i.e. to post the excise in J1IEX,so we do not have to post our cenvat/modvat entry in MIRO but we need to calculate VAT whether it is deductible or non deductible.So far this thing is concerned,we made separate tax code which we use at time of MIRO posting and in configuration we did not attached the tax code in logitics-basic excise -assign to company code. Because once we attached here , system asking to make to pass furst RG part2 entry then it allows to post MIRO entry which we do not want .So please understand this scenario is different and we got the success for JVRN/JVRD for VAT but getting issue in case of capital VAT where system does not calculate tax for JVCN/JVCD .....where we want to process MIRO without posting J1IEX..
Please thing and analyse ..give some helping response..
Thanks,
Dharmveer

Taxes not calculated in MIRO

Hi,
We are using TAXINN procedure and we maintained all the relevent condition records for excise and VAT. The excise and VAT are getting properly calulated in PO and all the accounting entries in GR and J1IEX_P are correct.
However at the time of MIRO, evem after making a tick in the "Calculate taxes" check box, the taxes are not getting calulated. The tax code used is V0-zero tax.
Is any customising setting required ?
Thanks,
SR

Hello,
1. Create new tax code in FTXP.
2. Assign the tax code to company code (SPRO >> Logistic general >> Tax on goods movement >> India >> Basic settings >> Determination of excise duty >> Condition based excise determination >> Assign tax code to company codes
3. In access sequence JTAX include table 003-Tax Classification at the top before Plant/Vendor/Material - 363
4.Now matain the condition record for new tax code in fv11 for plant material and vendor combination for your condtion types like JMOP, JVRD etc also matain the set-off condition type also.
Regards,
Shailesh

Finding duplicates within a date range. SQL help please!!

I have a table of records and I am trying to query the duplicate emails that appear within a given date range but cant figure it out.
There records that it returns are not all duplicates withing the given date range. HELP!!
Here is my query.
Thanks in advance.
SELECT cybTrans.email, cybTrans.trans_id, cybTrans.product_number, cybTrans.*
FROM cybTrans
WHERE (((cybTrans.email) In (SELECT [email] FROM [cybTrans] As Tmp GROUP BY [email] HAVING Count(*)>1 ))
AND ((cybTrans.product_number)='27')
AND ((cybTrans.appsystemtime)>'03-01-2010')
AND ((cybTrans.appsystemtime)<'03-05-2010')
ORDER BY cybTrans.email;

Yet another method...
<cfset start_date = DateFormat('01/01/2007',
'mm/dd/yyyy')>
<cfset end_date = DateFormat('09/30/2009',
'mm/dd/yyyy')>
<cfset start_year = DatePart('yyyy', start_date)>
<cfset end_year = DatePart('yyyy', end_date)>
<cfset schoolyear_start = '09/01/'>
<cfset schoolyear_end = '06/30/'>
<cfset count = 0>
<cfloop index="rec" from="#start_year#"
to="#end_year#">
<cfset tmp_start = DateFormat('#schoolyear_start##rec#',
'mm/dd/yyyy')>
<cfset tmp_end = DateFormat('#schoolyear_end##rec + 1#',
'mm/dd/yyyy')>
<cfif DateCompare(tmp_start,start_date) gt -1 and
DateCompare(tmp_end, end_date) eq -1>
<cfset count = count + 1>
</cfif>
</cfloop>
<cfoutput>
<br>There are #count# school year periods between
#start_date# and #end_date#
</cfoutput>

Assign Month within a date range (by most days in a given month)

I have a begin and end date, sample data as such
select to_date('01-13-12','mm-dd-yy') from_dt,
to_date('02-23-12','mm-dd-yy') to_dt
from dual
union all
select to_date('03-15-2012','mm-dd-yy') from_dt,
to_date('04-16-2012','mm-dd-yy') to_dt
from dual
union all
select to_date('05-13-2012','mm-dd-yy') from_dt,
to_date('07-23-2012','mm-dd-yy') to_dt
from dual
How do I assign a month by the most days in a month within that date range? Sometimes the date range might have the exact same amount of days in a month (like 3/15/2012 has 16 days and 4/16/2012 has 16 days). In this case, I want the earlier month (march).
So from the sample data:
01/13/2012, 02/23/2012, February
03/15/2012, 04/16/2012, March
05/13/2012, 07/23/2012, June
Thanks
Edited by: user4422426 on Mar 1, 2012 5:15 PM

Hi,
Here's one way:
WITH     cntr          AS
     SELECT     LEVEL - 1     AS n
     FROM     (
               SELECT      1 + MAX (to_dt - from_dt)     AS max_day_cnt
               FROM     table_x
     CONNECT BY     LEVEL     <= max_day_cnt
,     got_r_num     AS
     SELECT     x.from_dt, x.to_dt
     ,     TRUNC (x.from_dt + c.n, 'MONTH')     AS month
     ,     count (*)                    AS cnt
     ,     ROW_NUMBER () OVER ( PARTITION BY from_dt, to_dt
                         ORDER BY        COUNT (*)     DESC
                         ,             TRUNC (x.from_dt + c.n, 'MONTH')
                       )     AS r_num
     FROM       cntr     c
     JOIN       table_x x ON c.n <= x.to_dt - x.from_dt
     GROUP BY x.from_dt, x.to_dt
     ,       TRUNC (x.from_dt + c.n, 'MONTH')
SELECT     from_dt, to_dt
,     TO_CHAR (month, 'Mon YYYY')     AS mon
,     cnt
FROM     got_r_num
WHERE     r_num     = 1
;Thanks for posting code to create the same data. Please test your code before you post it: you got the order of arguments to TO_DATE reversed.

Import PO subsequent Debit: Taxes not calculated as per tax Code in MIRO

Dear All,
I am facing the problem while taking Subsequent debit (MIRO) of Import PO. I am using service Tax code 10.30 % .
When I entered the amount 4000 INR. It calculated the taxes 348.18 which is not correct.
I also check condition in FV13 its properly maintained.
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Pawan Sarda

Hello
Thanks for ur Reply.
MIRO -- Subsequent Debit -
>Tax code - S3 ( 10.30 % Services Tax) -
>PO NO. -
> change Vendor ( Import Vendor to Domestic Vendor) -
> Amount 4000 INR -
> also change Tax Code of Line Item   -
>Simulate
Vendor A\c -
>   4,348.18 INR Cr
Stock A\c -
> 4,000.00 INR Dr
Service Tax -
>     338.04 INR Dr
ECS             -
>         6.76 INR Dr
HECS          -
>       3.38 INR Dr
Above process I m doing against Import PO but I m not identify why its calculated Wrong Service Tax or calculating on which base amount ?
Actual Entry
Vendor A\c -
> 4,412.00 INR Cr
Stock A\c -
> 4,000.00 INR Dr
Service Tax -
>    400.00 INR Dr
ECS             -
>        8.00 INR Dr
HECS          -
>      4.00 INR Dr
Edited by: pawansarda on Jan 21, 2012 11:41 AM

TAX not Calculating for Unplanned Delivery cost in MIRO

Dear All,
I am having an issue with Unplanned delivery cost in MIRO,
We have to do an accounting of a invoice/PO which contains in addition to actual Value the Unplanned Delivery cost also, and for which also the TAXes also applicable with ED 10% and ECess 2%,SHcess 1% ,
Now in MIRO if i want to enter these Packing and forwarding chanrges in Unplanned delivery cost, but the TAX rates is not calculating for the same.
The TAX rates are calculating only for the values other than Unplanned delivery cost.
What i want TAX also need to be calculate based on the TAX code choosen in MIRO or as flow that of PO.
I have checked in OMR2, there we have mentioned Default Unplanned delivery cost tax code as ED NIL.
Can any where in the setting we can say by default the TAX rates should calculate as that of PO or whatever TAX codes we have choosen in MIRO.
How to achive this, pl help.
Regards,
Nagaraj S

hi
the screen shot i sent is also of 4.7E
now u can check OMR2 for default tax code for unplanned delivery cost
can u show us the screen shot of the details tab of MIRO
also check in SPR>MM>LIV>Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted
here what value u have maintained ,we are using 2 as (2 Different G/L line)
regards
kunal
Edited by: Kunal Ingale on May 19, 2010 6:18 AM

MIRO:Taxes not calculating

Hi Gurus,
I am using TAXINN
Noe PO is done with all cond records
GR is also fine
J1IEX is also captured & posted
But while posting MIRO,when I click on 'Calculate Tax'    the taxes are not calculating,
Plz suggest
Rgds
Vinay

Hi,
Go to OB40
maintain Cenvat Clearing account in for all taxcodes.
for E.g.
maintain ECS for Edu Cess, BED and J16 for H Edu cess
all enteries must be like
During Excise Invoice Credit
                                    Cenvat Account           Dr.
                                    Cenvat Clearing                      Cr.
            During Invoice Verification
                                    Cenvat Clearing          Dr.
                                    GR/IR Clearing           Dr.
                                    Vendor Payable                      Cr.
Regards,
Pardeep Malik

Extended Withholding Tax not calculating

Hi
We are in ECC 6. In development system, we configured Extended Withhoding Tax for India and tested Vendor Invoice FB60. It works perfectly without any problem. It post separate line item for withholding tax as well.
We moved the configuration to Test system, where it is not working at all. All settings are as similar as development system. Vendor master record also similar as development. The document entered for testing is same as development.
Why it is not calculating Withholding tax in Test system? Is it any thing is to be done manually (like activation), table update.. in client independently?
You suggestion is most impartant.
Thanks
Venkat

Dear Venkatasubramanya,
Check the following Master data in your Test System......
1. Vendor Master Data: Check in Withholding tax tab, whether liable tick is activated or not for your Tax Codes
2. Whether your Withholding tax types are oayment type or invoice type
check in GL Master (Vendor Reco Account), Field Status Group, Whether Withholding tax fields are optional or not.
Best Regards

Tax not calculating In FB60.

we are using Taxinn maintain plant/vendor/material in Fv11   for condition JVRD using single tax code V1. all VAT calculation   for diffrent tax rate on single tax code. In MIRO vat tax calculating but not In FB60.
We upgrade The PRD up patch level 21 prior to up grade patch tax calculation was working in FB60 .
we are maintain plant & material at line level, also put business places in fb60.
we maintain Table J_1IT030K GL plant wise & business place wise with along with account key JP5.
what configuration i have to check for calculation tax in fb60.

Dear Raj,
Please check the below suggestion that can be useful:
Point 4 of SAP note 952289 gives a clear idea about this issue.
It is as follows.......
4. For direct posting to FI through the transaction FB60/ FB70, the ta
calculation is not taking place.
Answer: Ensure that the following steps are carried out -
1. Insert the condition table 003 in the access sequence JTAX/JST1
one above the last step.
2. DO NOT MARK IT AS EXCLUSIVE.
3. Create new set of TAX codes to be used in FI only.
4. Maintain condition records for these tax code using the table 003,
through FV11 with the appropriate tax percentage.
Further make sure that the said tax code is present in FTXP and the
same is assigned to your respective company code,in the following
customising node:
SPRO > Logictics general > Tax on goods mvmt > India > Determination
of excise duty > Asssign tax code to company code..
This solution is relevant for all direct tax related postings through
FI.
I hope this helps.
Mauri

Excise and tax not calulating in MIRO

Hi ,
I have created on PO in which system showing exicse and VAT amount.
But while doing MIRO it is not showing any tax and exice even though i selected calculate tax option.
Regards,
Ravindra

HI,
Check your tax code appearing during MIRO. If it corrosponds to the excise & VAT then the taxes should appear on MIRO
Regards

Tax not calculating in PO

HI MM Gurus,
I have maintained the necessary condition type in ZTAXIN (Copy of TAXINN) Procedure for Surcharge which is calculating on VAT 12.5% for Haryana State. System is not calculating for this condition type but system is calculating Taxes for other condition types.
I have checked in FV12 also, records are exists. I have also checked in Tax condition type it is also showing the records for access.
When i am checking analysis for Tax Procedure for Surcharge condition it is showing error as - "Condition record exists (Manually removed)".
Kindly help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Neeraj Saini

Hi, Neeraj
The purchase order you are talking of, was it created before this changes were carried out? If so, this changes will not get effected. in this case create a New purchase order.
Even after this if the error exists then check the following:
1. The condition type should be a copy of VAT condition type.
2. The condition type should of category "Tax".
3. Check there is no conflict of condition records, try to maintain condition Record using the same acces as that of VAT.
4. Use the same Tax Code as that of VAT condition type.
Hope this will correct your problem.
Regards

Tax not calculating for loss of pay on the reduced basic pay

Hi Experts,
We have an employee who has LOP for five days and hence the basic pay is reduced. However for tax calculation the system is not considering the reduced basic pay, it is considering the actual basic pay.
Eg
Employee X has 5 day Loss Of Pay for the month of May.
His actual Basic Pay is Rs 10,000
His Basic pay after considering the 5 day loss of pay is Rs 8,000 for the month May
For this particulat month system is calculating tax on actual Basic Pay i.e Rs 10,000. However we want the tax to be calculated on the reduced basic pay.
Please provide with your valuable inputs.
Thanks in Advance
Koutilya

Hi,
Tax is not calculated on the month salary. It is the annual salary on which tax is computed and deducted.
Annual salary gets stored in WT /410 (Regular Income) WT /411 (Irregular Income) and /413 (Perks).
Annual Regular income is computed as under:
Annual Reg Income = Regular Income Paid till last month + Regular Income for current month + Projected Regular income for balance months in the FY.
Check the values of these WTs in your case. These must be different in May from the values in April.
VK

Tax not calculating in MIRO within a date range.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for