Tax not calculating for loss of pay on the reduced basic pay

Hi Experts,
We have an employee who has LOP for five days and hence the basic pay is reduced. However for tax calculation the system is not considering the reduced basic pay, it is considering the actual basic pay.
Eg
Employee X has 5 day Loss Of Pay for the month of May.
His actual Basic Pay is Rs 10,000
His Basic pay after considering the 5 day loss of pay is Rs 8,000 for the month May
For this particulat month system is calculating tax on actual Basic Pay i.e Rs 10,000. However we want the tax to be calculated on the reduced basic pay.
Please provide with your valuable inputs.
Thanks in Advance
Koutilya

Hi,
Tax is not calculated on the month salary. It is the annual salary on which tax is computed and deducted.
Annual salary gets stored in WT /410 (Regular Income) WT /411 (Irregular Income) and /413 (Perks).
Annual Regular income is computed as under:
Annual Reg Income = Regular Income Paid till last month + Regular Income for current month + Projected Regular income for balance months in the FY.
Check the values of these WTs in your case. These must be different in May from the values in April.
VK

Similar Messages

TAX not Calculating for Unplanned Delivery cost in MIRO

Dear All,
I am having an issue with Unplanned delivery cost in MIRO,
We have to do an accounting of a invoice/PO which contains in addition to actual Value the Unplanned Delivery cost also, and for which also the TAXes also applicable with ED 10% and ECess 2%,SHcess 1% ,
Now in MIRO if i want to enter these Packing and forwarding chanrges in Unplanned delivery cost, but the TAX rates is not calculating for the same.
The TAX rates are calculating only for the values other than Unplanned delivery cost.
What i want TAX also need to be calculate based on the TAX code choosen in MIRO or as flow that of PO.
I have checked in OMR2, there we have mentioned Default Unplanned delivery cost tax code as ED NIL.
Can any where in the setting we can say by default the TAX rates should calculate as that of PO or whatever TAX codes we have choosen in MIRO.
How to achive this, pl help.
Regards,
Nagaraj S

hi
the screen shot i sent is also of 4.7E
now u can check OMR2 for default tax code for unplanned delivery cost
can u show us the screen shot of the details tab of MIRO
also check in SPR>MM>LIV>Configure How Unplanned Delivery Costs Are Posted
here what value u have maintained ,we are using 2 as (2 Different G/L line)
regards
kunal
Edited by: Kunal Ingale on May 19, 2010 6:18 AM

Income Tax not Calculated for one employee.

Hi experts,
we have updated our patch lvl upto 86. Budget Changes Note is applied already. Now the Problem is with one employee.
Out of 1000 employees for one employee /436, /446 and /450 generated correctly with correct figure. But /460 is not generated.
I can see in the log /451 is generated with the amount exactly as /450.
Why system is not generating /460?
Can anyone guide me?
Regards
Nasim

Well the reaults are surprising as cross financial arrear /616 is only 1385.96 and relief generated by this is 18776. Which is simply not possible. Even in FY 2010-2011 relief should not be generated as relief only comes when employee is end up paying more taxes than last year tax on arrears. Now since tax slabs are increased, relief will not be egenrated.
This issue you can check with OSS message.
IF you want to deactivate the Section 89 relief implementation switch S89SW constant as 0 in table V_T511K. It may also activated on employee level, then you need to check IT0588/ subtype 4. Before deactivating it check out the impact after deactivation in case of retro as i may increase/ decrease the past tax.
Please note that implementation level switch supposed to be activated/ deactivated only once in lifetime of SAP system.

Tax not calculating for parked invoices

Hi
We are using external tax system to determine taxes in SAP. When an invoice in MIRO is posted normally, the external tax system is called and tax is getting updated. Whereas, when the invoice is parked for future posting, tax is not being calculated.
Please help.

Hi Nikitha
I am able to park the document with tax. The problem is when I return to the parked document, I cannot see the tax in the field i.e., it shows 0.00 and therefore the system does not allow me to post the document.

F110-Withholding Tax Not Calculating

Dear Gurus,
For ceratin vendors in F110 system is not paying and in payment run log a msg is generated as--Internal Error:Doc Balance not zero.In one vendor there are 2 open items system is calculating WHT for one invoice correctly and showing in payment log for ther other other than posting its its showing at as a difference and sysing that doc balance is not zero.
But when I simulated the 2 invoices separately in F-53 correct WHt is shown but unable to understand why Payment Prog is not calculating for one of the documents.
My client is based out of Thailand both docs have same WHT code and and WHT Type that is at payment.Please help.
Regards
Prabin

You are saying that the invoice which are created with tax codes creates problem when it is paid through F110 that too for certain vendors, right ? Still I am asking, at the time of invoice booking (F-43), the document will have line items with payable amount, tax deductions, etc. right ? This payable amount only will be selected in F110 run. Why then you want to calculate TDS again in F110 ? With regard to your query that it is happening for certain vendors, please check the proper tax codes have been incorporated in the masters and the liable bock check is ticked.

Tax not calculating in PO

HI MM Gurus,
I have maintained the necessary condition type in ZTAXIN (Copy of TAXINN) Procedure for Surcharge which is calculating on VAT 12.5% for Haryana State. System is not calculating for this condition type but system is calculating Taxes for other condition types.
I have checked in FV12 also, records are exists. I have also checked in Tax condition type it is also showing the records for access.
When i am checking analysis for Tax Procedure for Surcharge condition it is showing error as - "Condition record exists (Manually removed)".
Kindly help me to resolve this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Neeraj Saini

Hi, Neeraj
The purchase order you are talking of, was it created before this changes were carried out? If so, this changes will not get effected. in this case create a New purchase order.
Even after this if the error exists then check the following:
1. The condition type should be a copy of VAT condition type.
2. The condition type should of category "Tax".
3. Check there is no conflict of condition records, try to maintain condition Record using the same acces as that of VAT.
4. Use the same Tax Code as that of VAT condition type.
Hope this will correct your problem.
Regards

My friend has an apple iphone 4s, He could not make the ID on icloud, becase at the end of ID creation procedure, the message displayed, " the free icloud ID is not eligible for this device" what is the solution, thanx

My friend has an apple iphone 4s, He could not make the ID on icloud, becase at the end of ID creation procedure, the message displayed, " the free icloud ID is not eligible for this device" what is the solution, thanx

Your friend will have to create his iCloud account on a different iOS device. His device has already created the maximum number of iCloud accounts and cannot create another one.

TS1814 This is not working for me. I tried the Windows 7 Resolution steps multiple times to no avail. Please help. I am obviously connected to the internet (as is iTunes Store).

This is not working for me. I tried the Windows 7 Resolution steps multiple times to no avail. Please help. I am obviously connected to the internet (as is iTunes Store).
I am connected to the internet through a Verizon Wireless card, that is my regular internet connection.

I did all that HT1925 recommended and it was no help. My computer still won't recognize my iPhone. Often trying to start Apple Mobile Device Service fails with an error message that it starts and then stops immediately.

My sons Iphone5 is not eligible for content filter according to the website. Can I do something to make it "eligible"?

My sons Iphone5 is not eligible for content filter according to the website. Can I do something to make it "eligible"?

We certainly know how important it is to manage content filtering on wireless devices deckhand. I'm happy to advise that the iPhone has built in restriction options. On the device, simply go to Settings > General > Restrictions. Here you can enable restrictions on certain device function. I hope this helps.
Thank you…
ArnettH_VZW
Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

My iphone 4 does not ring for messages when i use the handsfree..

my iphone 4 does not ring for messages when i use the handsfree..

iPhone supports A2DP audio streaming. If you have it paired to a handsfree kit that supports this, for example, an in car audio system, and are currently tuned to a source other than the phone, the phone will send the audio for things like text message alerts to the handsfree system, but you will not hear them. This is just the nature of the beast. If you do not intend to use audio streaming from the phone, you may be able to disable this in the in car system. This should not affect Bluetooth calling. There is no option to disable this on the phone itself.

Duties are not calculating for new tax code

hello all,
I have some tax codes through which i am able to calculate the BED and so on. now BED rate has been changed so have created new tax code, but with that code BED is not calculating only SHEC is calculating.
What could be the reason for this pls explain me.
Thanks
Murali

Hi,
Please check whether you have maintained the Tax % Rates of the new Tax Code in the particular condition records.
With Regards
Sagar

Taxes not calculation in PO

Hi,
We have scenario like this
Currently we are using 4 tax codes with different combination like V1- Excise + L-VAT 4%, V2- Nil Excise+4% L-VAT, V3 u2013 Excise + C-VAT 12.5% & V4 u2013 Nil Excise+ C-VAT 12.5% Here 4% VAT is local VAT within state & C u2013VAT other state.
We are using TAXINN procedure I know in this procedure values are not depending on tax code what we maintain in PO. But it will fetch taxes from condition what we maintain in FV11.My actual issue popping here is when we had created another tax code and maintaining the condition in FV11 with key combination of Material/Plant/Vendor it is not populating in PO when if click tax tab, but when if I change tax code it is showing value with this calculation it is ok and entire cycle is completed successfully but my concern here, it is triggering same GL but we want it to hit different GL as per configuration in OB40 with relevant account key and combination of tax code and GL which is the reason we had created separate tax code. What would be reason?
Regards

HI,
Check whether you have maintained the rates for the new tax code in FV11 also whether you have assigned the tax code to the company code ?
Compare the tax code which is working in PO with the one which is not & find out if there is any difference.
If you want to post the tax values to the new G/L in OB40 then maintain the same settings for the tax code which is working in PO.
Thanks & Regards,

Import PO subsequent Debit: Taxes not calculated as per tax Code in MIRO

Dear All,
I am facing the problem while taking Subsequent debit (MIRO) of Import PO. I am using service Tax code 10.30 % .
When I entered the amount 4000 INR. It calculated the taxes 348.18 which is not correct.
I also check condition in FV13 its properly maintained.
Thanks in Advance
Regards
Pawan Sarda

Hello
Thanks for ur Reply.
MIRO -- Subsequent Debit -
>Tax code - S3 ( 10.30 % Services Tax) -
>PO NO. -
> change Vendor ( Import Vendor to Domestic Vendor) -
> Amount 4000 INR -
> also change Tax Code of Line Item   -
>Simulate
Vendor A\c -
>   4,348.18 INR Cr
Stock A\c -
> 4,000.00 INR Dr
Service Tax -
>     338.04 INR Dr
ECS             -
>         6.76 INR Dr
HECS          -
>       3.38 INR Dr
Above process I m doing against Import PO but I m not identify why its calculated Wrong Service Tax or calculating on which base amount ?
Actual Entry
Vendor A\c -
> 4,412.00 INR Cr
Stock A\c -
> 4,000.00 INR Dr
Service Tax -
>    400.00 INR Dr
ECS             -
>        8.00 INR Dr
HECS          -
>      4.00 INR Dr
Edited by: pawansarda on Jan 21, 2012 11:41 AM

Extended Withholding Tax not calculating

Hi
We are in ECC 6. In development system, we configured Extended Withhoding Tax for India and tested Vendor Invoice FB60. It works perfectly without any problem. It post separate line item for withholding tax as well.
We moved the configuration to Test system, where it is not working at all. All settings are as similar as development system. Vendor master record also similar as development. The document entered for testing is same as development.
Why it is not calculating Withholding tax in Test system? Is it any thing is to be done manually (like activation), table update.. in client independently?
You suggestion is most impartant.
Thanks
Venkat

Dear Venkatasubramanya,
Check the following Master data in your Test System......
1. Vendor Master Data: Check in Withholding tax tab, whether liable tick is activated or not for your Tax Codes
2. Whether your Withholding tax types are oayment type or invoice type
check in GL Master (Vendor Reco Account), Field Status Group, Whether Withholding tax fields are optional or not.
Best Regards

Tax not Calculated on Activity created through Service master

Hi;
For different TAX values on Multiple line items in P.O, i am using Service Master to Create an Activity, and call that activity in my Service entry sheet.
Now When Service entry sheet (P.R) is adopted in P.O it doesn't calculate tax.
Any valuable information on this would be highly appreciated.
Regards.

Hi,
In the purchase order the taxes are calcuated at item level. In the
service entry sheet the taxes are calculated at service level.
The non-deductible input taxes both in the purchase order and on the
service entry sheet serve for the commitments structure and for
information.
The tax actually paid with the invoice is later more precisely
redetermined by the invoice verification in the system.
You can set the Customizing alternatively that the
taxes are calculated at service level instead of at item level. This
setting is particularly useful if different services of an item are to
be taxed differently as it is the rule in countries with
jurisdiction-dependent taxes. Please check your settings in transaction ML100.
In this connection, refer to Notes 498878, 495316 and 371595.
Regards,
Edit

Tax not calculating for loss of pay on the reduced basic pay

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for