Term Based Relations SLOW to edit.

I have a Domain of Address line information, and am adding Term Based Relations to do things like change "St" to "Street". Fairly straight forward.
But while adding values to the list, the interface is PAINFULLY slow. When I click the Add button and start typing in the box, the characters don't show up right away. I can be 10 characters typed ahead of the screen.
Then when I click Apply Changes, the "In Process - Please wait..." message stays up for a couple of minutes.
What is going on? I only added ONE ROW and it take three minutes to save it?
THIS IS PAINFUL.
How can I speed this up, if it is even possible? Is it dependent on the number of rows in the Domain? I have like 30,000 address rows. Is it checking all the TBR's against all the address rows? I thought it would only do that when you actually RAN the project,
NOT when you are trying to DEFINE it.
Plus, when I switch from one Domain in the Project to another, it takes like 10 or 15 seconds to bring it up.
Todd C - MSCTS SQL Server 2005, MCITP BI Dev 2008 Please mark posts as answered where appropriate.

Hi Nikesh, 
If I understood you correctly, it is correcting your string because you gave it a domain value and no rules to guide the correction behavior. This way, DQS is comparing everything with that domain value to check if it is similar, and that stringwas similar
enough, so DQS corrected it to the value you said "it was the only one valid in the domain"
You can implement that correction in two ways
- Using a term-based relation, specifying that every time DQS encounters the string "I C G E B" (even inside other strings) it will replace it with International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
- Specifying a correction in your domain values. Manually insert the value "I C G E B", mark it as an error and specify its correction with International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology. 
Given your case, I'd rather take the first option, because we are talking about a replacement of initial letters, not about a correction. If you take the second option, you will get weird corrections as you have encountered already. 
Regards. 
Pau.

Similar Messages

  • DQS Term-based relations value contains white space is not allowed

    Hi
    SQL Server 2012:
    I have a term 'R & D' which i would like to replace with 'Research and Development'. How do i incorporate it in the DQS 2012 cleansing?
    I want to replace 'I C G E B' with 'International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology'. I created a Domain values. On cleasning, it corrected the source value 'Centre for Genetic Engineering
    and Biotechnology, Cuba' with 'International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology' with Confidence score was 81%. Not sure, why is it replacing. I have only one domain value. I have
    no other rules or term-based relations during my testing. Probably it took the initials of 'I C G E B' and partially matched in 'Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Cuba'.
    Any solution how to solve this.
    Any help much appreciated.
    Nikesh Shah
    Nikesh Shah

    Hi Nikesh, 
    If I understood you correctly, it is correcting your string because you gave it a domain value and no rules to guide the correction behavior. This way, DQS is comparing everything with that domain value to check if it is similar, and that stringwas similar
    enough, so DQS corrected it to the value you said "it was the only one valid in the domain"
    You can implement that correction in two ways
    - Using a term-based relation, specifying that every time DQS encounters the string "I C G E B" (even inside other strings) it will replace it with International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
    - Specifying a correction in your domain values. Manually insert the value "I C G E B", mark it as an error and specify its correction with International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology. 
    Given your case, I'd rather take the first option, because we are talking about a replacement of initial letters, not about a correction. If you take the second option, you will get weird corrections as you have encountered already. 
    Regards. 
    Pau.

  • JDeveloper 12c too slow do edit BPM Process

    Dear forum members,
    I have installed the quickstart SOA/BPM 12c bundle and I am using Process Composer and JDev to develop a customer's POC.
    The problem is, when I download my BPM project from PAM in JDEV, it is really slow do edit it. From moving a task in the model to using data association.
    I imported a project without relation to the repository and it wasn't so slow. I also have disabled auto build on save, which actually improved the performance a bit.
    Has anybody experienced that?
    Regards.

    I solved the problem by installing the 18964763 patch from Oracle Support.

  • Slow Code Editing in Flash Builder 4.7

    For some reason my Code Editor works painfully slow. I see that other folks have experienced this issue. I don't want to switch to another IDE. I have already increased the values of Xms and XMX (Xms1024m -Xmx2048m) and also created a new workspace but it did not make a difference. Other appliations work fine. I am using a i7 laptop with 16GB of RAM.
    FB was working fine and then all of a sudden started to slow down. I believe that it happened after I  installed Apached Flex SDK but I am not positive. I have other IDEs that I use for testing things so that might be a problem as well. I would like some help to fix the slow code editing because it is making it difficult to use FB and I don't want to change.
    I have Creative Cloud account.
    The size of the project is 19mb.

    Hi Blake,
    In another page (http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1056583), Adobe states that it will be possible to download 4.6 in alternative to 4.7, to still have the Design View. However, I have not seen such possibility yet.
    I will not say that "real programmers don't use design mode". They do, if it works fine.
    However, the Design View was not very useful for mobile projects, if you wanted to create an interface which, at run time, adapts to different screen estates.
    It was very good to draw an initial mock-up, but only the simulator (and the device) can say how the app really looks like (if you want to know more, please have a look here: http://aliencoding.com/2013/02/22/adobe-flash-builder-4-7-has-no-design-view-is-it-blasphe my-no-but-the-software-contains-some-other-blasphemous-aspects/).
    If you develop for desktop, then I agree the Design View lack is a real drag. I think Adobe should at least lower the price of the program, now that it's been scaled down for (I think) copyright issues (the Design mode relies on Flash professional components that was not donated to Apache).
    I love this platform because it really saved my butt in cases of real fast devployment, BUT NOW it lacks support for Windows 8 that PhoneGap has...
    Can we say... it is a legacy framework by now? 

  • Payment Terms based on Value Date (UDF)

    Hi, is it possible and if how? I want to create a new Payment Term based on a value date which is maybe months ahead. So the docduedate is after this value date but the document shall already go into accounting.
    how is this easily possible?

    Hello,
    If you mean that the payment due date in the payment terms should be calculated on the basis of some date specified in a udf, it is not possible.
    But what you can do is use formatted search to calculate the due date based on the udf. apply this formatted search in due date field.
    Rahul

  • Payment terms based on specific dist.channel, division and Plant but not from customer master.

    Dear All
    I have a requirement,
    Generally payments terms from customer master will flow to sales order. but here my requirement is to get a different payment terms based on specific distribution channel, division, customer  and plant those are there in sales order but not from customer master. is there any user exit or functional module to fulfill this requirement, or any other suggestion appreciated.
    Thanks,
    Reddy

    This Problem you can solve without user exit too.
    The Customer master data itself can solve the problem.
    You can maitain diffrent Payment Term as per the sales area (Dist.Ch+Div+S.org) of customer master.
    and each sales are wise u can change the plant also.
    You just need to set your logic with the combination of sales are and plant. And need to assign which payment term should determine to sales order.
    If you are rasing sales order with X sales area relavent to that payment term will trigger.
    Hope above logic will work, otherwise you can go with user exit.

  • Payment term based discount or surcharge

    Client have requirement of Payement term based discount or surcharge. Conditions are like below:
    1. 10% discount to customer if he is paying cash.
    2. 5% discount if he is paying with in 15 days by cash, check or wire transfer.
    3. 5% surcharge on all other Payment terms other than above two mentioned.
    4. There are many payment terms  that's why We do not want to create several conditions record for surcharge.
    Please help & advice how to solve this using Standard SAP (With out writing any ABAP program or new routine).
    thanks

    Hi Jitender
    Please correct me if I am wrong.Looks like you have better Idea on this!
    why do You think that the issue is more of factoring discount?
    If he maitain 3 condion records for the 3 different payment terms, the system checks the payment terms from the customer master data in the order - Right?
    condtion record  EX:sales org, D.c, payment terms( for cash) - 10%( = $10)
    like that he will maitain 3 condition records for 3 payment terms.
    The moment I enter cystomer(systmem checks from customer master) in the sales order the sytem will picks up the $10 from condition record and it will display as a discount.
    whats wrong in that?
    Please can you clarify me.
    Thanks

  • Color correction slows down editing

    In CS 5.5 I  adjusted the curves for color correction for the first time and then renedered the 12min video for 1hour 20min. I now see a couple of minor clip edits I want to make.  However, Premiere is acting very slow and choppy.  Is the color correcting I did slowing the edit process down?

    Truthfully, what I would recommend is to turn off all CC,
    edit, nail your timings... then color correct.
    I always have considered and treated CC as a 'final touch'
    that can't really be done full justice until the cut itself is solid.
    But...
    If you have clips that really need to be CC'ed as you are editing,
    you should Preview Render those clips for smooth playback
    in the Timeline as you continue to edit.
    Also:
    Red, yellow, and green render bars and what they mean
    http://blogs.adobe.com/premierepro/2011/02/red-yellow-and-green-render-bars.html

  • Elements 13 works really slow in editing.Can someone help. I have OSX Yosemite 10

    elements 13 works really slow in editing.Can someone help. I have OSX Yosemite 10

    First of all, did you have PSE installed before updating to 10.10? If so, you need to do this:
    A Reminder for Mac Folks upgrading to Yosemite | Barbara's Sort-of-Tech Blog
    Also, be sure you have updated to 10.10.1. And if you have a large number of recently imported images in the organizer, PSE will be slow till organizer is through creating thumbnails for the photos.

  • IWeb - slow to edit

    I started building a website with iWeb (first website ever actually).  It has grown to maybe 30 pages, and, there are quite a few images.  Working on changes to the site has become really cumbersome (very slow to edit).  I have plenty of RAM (12GB).  However, the CPU gets pegged at 90-100% anytime I touch iweb.  Just wondering if there is something I can do to make maintaining the site easier. 
    As a note, it loads fine on the web - no performance issues there.
    Thanks for any help.

    Missed your 10.7. In Lion the Library folder is now invisible. To make it permanently visible enter the following in the Terminal application window: chflags nohidden ~/Library and hit the Enter button - 10.7: Un-hide the User Library folder.
    For opening your domain file in Lion for the first time or to switch between multiple domain files  Cyclosaurus has provided us with the following script that you can make into an Applescript application with Script Editor. Open Script Editor, copy and paste the script below into Script Editor's window and save as an application.
    Just launch the applicaiton, find and select the domain file you want to open and it will open with iWeb. It modifies the iWeb preference file each time it's launched so one can switch between domain files.
    do shell script "/usr/bin/defaults write com.apple.iWeb iWebDefaultsDocumentPath -boolean no"delay 1
    tell application "iWeb" to activate

  • Approval Templates -Terms based on user query looks like cant work

    Dear all,
    How to use the "terms based on user query"? i try many time but it looks like cant work. do u have any example?
    good day...
    from
    grace

    I have found the way:
    A simple query to define a proper term in the approval stage:
    declare @var int
    set @var = 0
    Select case(@var) when 1 then 'true'  else 'false' end
    Returns 'true'--> Will not execute the approval procedure.
    @var = 1  Returns 'false'--> Will execute the approval procedure.

  • OT: Prior art for term-based licenses

    I note from Slashdot article http://slashdot.org/story/09/10/09/215235/Microsoft-Moves-To-Patent-Time-Based-Software-Licensing that Microsoft has applied for a patent on Term-based licenses.
    I wonder how log Oracle has had those types of licenses and whether they could be considered 'prior art' or 'common usage'? Or whether Oracle will end up paying Microsoft a user fee to keep selling term licenses?

    Hi Hans,
    Don't get me wrong, I'm a strong believer in intellectual property rights, but I'm not sure that computer programs fall under "inventions".
    There was a Supreme court case awhile back, where Apple sued Microsoft, claiming that they "invented" the drop-down menu, and therefore MS was infringing!
    The court said that "data access methods" cannot be patented.
    Have you seen this, the fight over Amazon's patent on one-click checkout?
    http://oreilly.com/news/patent_archive.html
    See here, all of Oracle's patents, thousands oif them:
    http://www.google.com/search?&q=site:www.patentstorm.us+oracle+
    Did you know that computer termminilogy can be legally protected?
    Bill Inmon owns rights to the phease "Data Wareshousing", and the term "middleware" is owned by TechGnosis Inc:
    http://www.dba-oracle.com/oracle_news/2005_3_30_software_patents_hinder_open_source.htm

  • FCPX slow for editing

    I'm surprised that FCPX 10.1.4 is so slow for editing, compare to FCP7.
    I'm on it since 2 months, and I love a lot of features, but I'm so frustrated with the color wheel turning for each editing point...
    I read a lot of post and then I add 16gb of RAM , so I have now 32 Gb on an Imac 27" i5 with Thunderbolt disk and Fusion drive.
    So my config is not a macpro, but not so bad...
    My editing is a classic 4 minutes corporate video, with speed motion, titling, black border, nothing extravagant...
    Shooting codec is XDCAM EX in 1280x720... and I bought this machine to go to 4K thanks to my new Sony FS7 camcorder...
    I don't think I will go far with a so slow software to edit 4K...
    Is there trick to speed up the editing process ?
    Main point is the rendering, each time you do a change FCPX render it, compare to FCP7 that was waiting for you to telling him to render... so you can concentrate on your editing, not waiting the wheel to stop turning...
    I don't understand why FCP7 is so much faster on a 5 years old imac than a new one...
    I'm not so sure that investing in a macpro will change dramatically the speed...

    hmmm... just re-enacted your timeline:
    two 'cropped' videos, a color-bar, a title, 4k ... :
    my source is 4k from a Lumix FZ1000, h.264mp4, 100MBs, NOT optimized!
    ==> no 'rendering', no beach-ball... ok, a lil' stutterish, my fastest drive is just a software Raid0 made with two tiny 2.5" Toshibas for 99€
    But manageable ...
    I would check your Drobo if it is 'set' for handling video streams with FCPX.
    In my hobbyist set-up, all drives are for sure hfs formatted...
    No idea about SAN & Co, ntfs, ethernet, stuff  .....
    PS: with optimized media (as Innocentius recommends) complete hassle-free … MacMini, late 2012, 16GBRam, no dedicated GPU
    and my stuff can handle FCPX without ext. converters, HA, you viking (<< int. joke)

  • ColdFusion Builder - Slow when editing code

    I have seen this many times on other forums, but haven't found any working solutions - my installation of the standalone Coldfusion Builder 1.0.0.25339 is nearly always very very slow when editing code (wehether this is cfm or css) i'm assuming the code hinting it somewhat to blame, but don't want to turn it off.
    Any help/solutions welcomed.

    The current state of the product is that it's rife with performance problems.
    Hopefully they'll be fixed in the next release.
    What you're seeing is just how it currently works (ie: slowly).
    Adam

  • I Dislike the Terms "Destructive" and "Non-Destructive" Editing

    Some folks in the Photoshop realm use the terms "destructive" and "non-destructive" to describe ways of using Photoshop in which transforms are applied directly to pixel values vs. being applied via layers or smart filters or smart objects or other means.
    Do you realize that the term "destructive" is actually mildly offensive to those who know what they're doing and choose to alter their pixel values on purpose?
    I understand that teaching new people to use Photoshop in a way that doesn't "destroy" their original image data is generally a good thing, and I'm willing to overlook the use of the term as long as you don't confront me and tell me what I'm doing when I choose to alter pixel values is "wrong" (or when I choose to advise others on doing so).
    For that people who claim editing pixel values is "destructive", I offer this one response, which is generally valuable advice, in return:
    Never overwrite your original file.
    There.  The "destruction" has ceased utterly.
    It's common sense, really.  You might want to use that file for something else in the future.
    If you shoot in raw mode with a digital camera, then you actually can't overwrite your raw files.  That's a handy side effect, though some don't use raw mode or even start working with digital photographs.
    In any case, when you open your image consider getting in the habit of immediately doing File - Save As and creating a .psd or .tif elsewhere, so that you can subsequently do File - Save to save your intermediate results.
    There can actually be many advantages to altering pixel values, if you know what you're doing and choose to do so.  But sometimes even the most adept Photoshop user might find that a given step created a monster; that's okay, there's a multi-step History palette for going back.  I normally set mine to keep a deep history, to give me a safety net if I DO do something wrong, though I tend to use it rarely.
    And for those who would tout the disadvantages to editing "destructively", there can be huge disadvantages to doing it "non-destructively" as well...  Accumulating a large number of layers slows things down and can use a lot of RAM...  With downsized zooms the mixing can yield posterization that isn't really there, or gee whiz, just TRY finding a computer fast enough to use smart filters in a meaningful way.  Just the concept of layers, if one hasn't worked out how layer data is combined in one's own mind, can be daunting to a new person!
    So I ask that you please stop saying that the "only" or "best" way to use Photoshop is to edit "non-destructively".  There are folks who feel that is offensive and arrogant.  I think the one thing everyone can agree upon is that THERE IS NO ONE OR BEST WAY TO USE PHOTOSHOP!
    You go ahead and do your editing your way.  I prefer to do "constructive" editing. 
    Thanks for listening to my rant.
    -Noel
    Man who say it cannot be done should not interrupt man doing it.

    function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
    Aegis Kleais wrote:
    When you alter image data in a manner that cannot be reverted, you have destroyed it.
    Really?
    That's one of those things that one is not supposed to question.  It just sounds so right!
    Problem is, it's insufficient in and of itself, and misleading...  It's a rule of thumb that's way too general.
    What IS "data" anyway?  Arrangement of magnetic spots on a disk?  My disk is still whole, so we're not talking about physical destruction here.
    One could argue that all the data is all still there in many cases of pixel-value-change editing (e.g., where there has been no resizing).  The image file is the same size!  Same amount of data.
    Upsampling, or making a copy of an image is actually creating more data, not destroying data.  Thus there is no general "destruction", but the terms "construction" or "creation" could be used.
    But wait, perhaps you're really talking about destroying information, not data...  Well...
    As it turns out the term "destructive" is still off base.  I have altered the information, possibly even adding important information.  If I make a copy this is a no brainer.  Even if I don't, depending on a person's skill in editing, the altered result could still carry all the original information that was important plus information added by editing, and be quite possibly better for its intended purpose (human consumption) than the image before the edit.  That's the goal!
    So now we're talking about important information vs. unimportant information.  And of course we're talking about fitness for a future purpose.
    As with anything, there are multiple ways to get there and multiple ways to interpret the words.
    The term "destructive" in my opinion was invented to further someone's agenda.
    -Noel

Maybe you are looking for