Test with no time limit

We administer a monthly open-book quiz, and the student is allowed 5 days to complete it.
Any way to implement this is Captivate without an LMS?

SP2 should allow longer records. Are you sure it is SP2?
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=27870

Similar Messages

Problems with the time limit in PCI6602

Hi,
I am using a counter-timer PCI-6602 to scan a sample.
I’m using Counter0 as a pulse generator to generate a GATE signal and Counter1 as a counter, and the mode is event counting.
J'd like to have a more precise definition about "time limit". If I used a GATE frecuency of 1KHz (1ms integration time) and a SOURCE frecuency of 10KHz with a time limit of 1sec, I measured1000 times a 10. That’s OK but that also means that I need to be 1 sec at each position!!!! And this is a lot of time!!! If I changed the time limit form 1sec to a fraction of a sec (300 ms for example) it doesn’t work. Why?
Could anybody help me! Thanks,
Lala

Lala,
What exactly do you mean by "I need to be 1 sec at each position"? Are you trying to interface with quadrature encoders? It is possible to perform a buffered period measurement which will sample the position once per second (hardware-timed). It also sounds like you are using Traditional NI-DAQ. Would it be possible to upgrade to NI-DAQmx? This API is recommended for new designs. Also, are you using LabVIEW or a text-based language. In the LabVIEW Example Finder (Help->Find Examples), search under "Hardware Input and Output->DAQmx->Counter Measurements->Position" for the Meas Angular Position-Buffered-Cont-Ext Clk.vi example. You can also use another counter to clock this buffered measurement. If this does not sound like what you are trying to accomplish, please let me know a bit more about your hardware and what you intend to do with it. I'm sure I could then recommend a better method.
Hope this helps,
Ryan Verret
Product Marketing Engineer
Signal Generators
National Instruments

PI 7.0: IDOCs struck in IDX5 with error "Time Limit Exceeded".

Hi All,
We have a File to IDOC scenario in PI 7.0. After mapping the IDOCs are posted from PI to ECC System.
On a normal day this interface works good, yesterday we received a huge file which resulted in the creation of about 25000 IDOCs from one single file. The mapping went fine, however the IDOCs created were not posted into ECC System. When we monitor the IDOCs using transaction code IDX5 in PI system, we found the error message as "Time limit exceeded", the user shown was "PIAFUSER". To overcome this error, we increased the time limit of PIAFUSER from default to about 1500 seconds.
Now, I want to push these IDOCs from PI into ECC System. Could you please let us know, how to push these IDOCs sitting in PI system to ECC?
We do not want to reprocess the file from the beginning. Please let us know if it is possible to push the IDOCs without processing the file? If yes, how to reprocess?
Thanks in advance.
Regards,
Manohar Dubbaka.

Hi,
the help documentation is as follows:
Check the tRFC Status
Use
tRFC calls which transfer IDocs use the function module IDOC_INBOUND_ASYNCHRONOUS at reception (before release 4.0: INBOUND_IDOC_PROCESS).
If an IDoc in the sending system has been passed to tRFC (IDoc status "03"), but has not yet been input in the receiving system, this means that the tRFC call has not yet been executed.
Activities
To check the status of the tRFC calls, choose Tools ® IDoc Interface/ALE ® Administration ® Monitoring ® Troubleshooting ® RFC Queue (SM58) and specify any additional selection criteria.
The program RSARFCEX restarts unsuccessful tRFC calls.
You cannot choose the option is being executed in background processing.
Best Regards,
Erik Hubers

IDoc Tracking: TIME LIMIT EXCEEDED

Hello!
We have about 15 different R/3 platforms connected to XI using the IDoc adapter. If I use the IDoc Tracking functionality in IDX5 it usually is working fine and the IDoc number in the receiving system and IDoc status are returned within seconds.
However, for one R/3 platform it was always taking about 30 minutes until the IDoc number and IDoc status were returned. The status bar displays that the IDOC_DATE_TIME_GET function module is executed.
Now it runs for over one hour until it stops with a TIME LIMIT EXCEEDED error message and no IDoc numbers and status is returned any more. What needs to be corrected to speed up IDoc tracking for this particular system?
Regards, Tanja

Not sure if this would help, but this link speaks of how to bypass time limit exceeded
http://www.erpgenie.com/abaptips/content/view/490/62/

How to stop an error message that pops up every time I open Safari. It reads...Safari 5.1 (v6534.50) has not been tested with the plugin PithHelmet .As a precaution, it has not been loaded. Please contact the plugin developer.

How do I stop this error message from popping up every time I start up Safari ?
Error message reads...
Safari 5.1 (v6534.50) has not been tested with the plugin Pithhelmet 3.0b6 (v 3006)
As a precaution, it has not been loaded. Please contact the plugin developer.
I have removed every trace of Pithhelmet, (via spotlight)
Trashed the preferences for Safari, restarted computer to no avail.
It just keeps keepin on.
Thanks

In the past I was able to bypass the message by editing the Info.plist file and updating the MaxBundleVersion variable, but not so this time around. As of today the developer seems to indicate there's no immediate fix becuase of how Safari 5.1 handles multiprocess page rendering. Probably best to stay tuned to Mike's website for now.

How to Implement a Time Limit Feature in an Online Test Application ?

I am creating an Online Test application. The time limit can be stored for a Test in the database.
How to implement a time limit such that when the test is started (user clicks on the Start button to go to the fragment containing the Questions) the time left is shown and the test ends (goes to home page) when the timer reaches zero.
Thanks

Hi,
timestamp is a date and thus cannot be used directly to determine seconds passed. So what you need to do is to build the difference between a saved time stamp and the current time.
http://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.4.2/docs/api/java/sql/Timestamp.html
So if you have two time stamps, then calling getTime() on each and building the difference gives you a value, which is millisecond. So to get this to an int value you divide it by 1000
Frank

On line test with time limits - need help

hi,
im developing a web aplication thatz a online test.
in that test i have to use time limit ,the test has to b stopped if the given time for the test reaches.
so the remaining time have to b displayed in the page ant that has to b maintained.
i will b displaying only one question in one page the next question will b displayed only after submitting the previous question.
how can i do this.
plz help me.
my advanced tnx es

My suggestion would be to use a JavaScript timer and submit the form when the timer counts till the end.
For a JavaScript timer, you can view a sample code at
http://www.javascript-page.com/timer.html
Hope it helps!!!
Annie.

Different decimal point character for numeric limit test vs multiple numeric test with database logging

Hi all,
I have a problem with decimal point character and database logging.
I've deselected "Use Localized Decimal Point" in Station Options->Localization. Teststand should now use "." as decimal point character (ignore the "'s).
When logging to database this is only true for Multiple numeric limit test results, not for Numeric limit test results.
Numeric limit test results use "," as decimal point character where it should be "."
I can't trust the localization settings on the PC as different endusers might have different settings.
Example:
(STEP_NAME and PROP_RESULT.DATA)
Numeric limit test 1,50127667932332
Multiple numeric limit test result_1 1
Multiple numeric limit test result_2 1
Multiple numeric limit test result_3 10.0304317
I've changed the Limits->Numeric format for each test but this change is only applied to the report, not the database result.
Read the manuals but didn't find anything...
Have I missed something obvious, or is this some kind of bug?
Teststand version is 2010.
Windows versions are XP SP3 and Win7. Same behavior on both OS.

When something is logged to the database as a number, the database is probably storing it in a way that is independent of any sort of decimal point localization. When you view the items in the database however it is probably going to show you the number based on the current locale settings. This is likely purely cosmetic, for display purposes.
-Doug

DNL_CUST_ADDR "SYSFAIL" with time limit exceeded

Hi Experts,
i hope you can help here.
We set up a new connection between a CRM and an ECC.
Everything worked fine until we started the initial customizing load.
All customizing objects went through, besides DNL_CUST_ADDR.
It stopped in the Inbound Queue of the CRM with error message "Sysfail" in Detail
"Time limit exceeded".
The Solution is not note 873918, we implemented it and it still doesn´t
work.
Ahead thank you very much.
Regards
Matthias Reich

Hi Matthias,
   You can try any of the following things.
   Before starting the initial load of this object, change the block size in DNL_CUST_ADDR object to 50. Here delete the current queue and reinitiate the load OR
   If you don't want to delete the existing queue, basis can increase the GUI maximum time. For this they need to change the parameter rdisp/max_wprun_time. You can see the current max time by executing the program RSPARAM. After doing this setting, you can unlock the queue.
//Bhanu

I rented a Movie and it has been loading for 3 hours now. Internet connection is fine. Have never had a problem with this before. What's really annoying is that the 24 hour time limit is counting down even though we cant watch it. Any suggestion"hours now

I rented a Movie and it has been loading for 3 hours now. Internet connection is fine. Have never had a problem with this before. What's really annoying is that the 24 hour time limit is counting down even though we cant watch it. Any suggestions?

The first thing to check would be your internet download speed, you can do this at www.speedtest.net.
HD movies require a recommended speed of 6 Mbps, while SD movies require a recommended speed of 2.5 Mbps.
Additionally, your 24 hours don't start until you begin to watch the movie, you have 30 days to start watching the movie.

UndefinedException when working with RL-facts and testing at design time

Hi,
I'm performing some tests with JDeveloper Rules Designer on a very basic level. I'm defining rl facts (fact types), define a rule and write a test function to test this rule at design time. When executing my test function with the "Test Function" function an error occurs:
UndefinedException: symbol 'Person' is undefined in main...
Person is a fact type (RL Fact) that is the output parameter type of the decision function. If I don't use an output parameter everything works fine.
If I use XML Facts instead of RL Facts and define an output parameter for the decision function everything works fine, too.
Are there any restrictions for rl facts?
//Mike

Sure you can read and write at the same time. But normally you would be reading from one place and writing to another place.
I rather regret avoiding the OP's earlier post asking how to combine two classes. I looked at the two classes posted and realized the best thing to do was actually to break them into more classes. But I also realized it was going to be a big job explaining why and how, and I just don't have the patience for that sort of thing.
So now we have a Big Ball Of Tar™ and I feel partly responsible.

Playing around with cfschedule, getting a time limit error - even with requesttimeout

Hello, everyone.
This isn't critical, I'm just playing around with the cfschedule tag. But it's still annoying to get a time limit error, even with the requesttimeout attribute set to 10800.
<cfschedule action="run" task="Collection_Daily_I" requesttimeout="10800">
Less than one minute after loading the page, I get:
The request has exceeded the allowable time limit Tag: cfhttp
^_^

I tried something else here. I noticed that on the last circuit you posted you had a resistor tied from ground to the clock line in addition to the one tied back to VCC. This would be R4 in the origianl schematic. I also noticed that in this circuit I saw no double tripping of the clock signal but it did have a sloping rising edge. I am assuming this is what you are refering to as being dirty. Not a clean square wave by any means.
I removed this extra resistor from the clock line and re-added the inverter and this seemed to clean up this slope. I do, not know what purpose you may have had for this resistor but I believe that to be causing the sloping edge. I was incorrect about the inverter. I just know that in the original configuration I didin't get the double clocking when it was removed, but I failed to notice the sloping of the edge of the signal. Now with this new information I hope this will get it the way you want it.
I will repost the circuit with my modifications. Let me know what you think. Just so you will know I am using asll default settings with the exception of the digital setting which is set to REAL.
Here it is:
Kittmaster's Component Database
http://ni.kittmaster.com
Have a Nice Day
Attachments:
ring_glitch possible solution_again1.ms10 ‏888 KB

Query0;Runtime error time limit exceeded,with parallel processing via RFC

Dear experts,
I have created a report on 0cca_c11 cube and while running my report when i give cost center group which contains many cost centers , my report executes for long time and at last gives message
"Error while reading data;navigation is possible" and
"Query0;Runtime error time limit exceeded,with parallel processing via RFC"
please tell me what is the problem and how can i solve this
Regards
Shweta

hI,
Execute the Query in RSRT with Execute and Debug option.
Select SQL statements toknow where exactly it's taking time.
Let us know the details once you done.
Reg
Pra

How can I get back the 15 minute time limit when making an iTunes purchase with out having to put in password again and again?

HHow can I get the 15 minute time limit back instead of putting in iTunes password on every purchase?

Settings > General > Restrictions > Require Password (Password Settings on iOS 8)

Time limit exceeded in inbound qRfc

Hi all!
Please I need your help with this timeout issue. I have the following scenario:
FTP --> XI (Java mapping) --> R3 (Idoc)
Where from that Java mapping I do some RFC's to R3 in order to make conversions and validations.
When I test this interface in development environment with a 1Mb flat file, it took 5 minutes to process. However, i did the same test in QA environment, it took pretty much more than 5 minutes and I got this "time limit exceeded" in the qRfc inbound queue (sxmb_moni t-code).
I was told that the hardware beneath development and QA are different but theorically, the later should be faster.
Anyone has any suggestion to resolve this? I will really appreciate it.
Best regards!
Vanesa.

Hi,
have a look on this doc called "HowTou2026 Investigate Timeouts in Synchronous XI/PI Scenario"
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c059d583-a551-2c10-e095-eb5d95e03747
You will certainly find your answer.
Regards.
Mickael

Test with no time limit

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for