TFS 2010 to 2013
I am confused on the steps needed when SQL Server Instance and Report Server are located on a server separate from TFS.
We are using new hardware for those as well to be compatible with the TFS2013 changeover.
Hi BossHogg20,
Thanks for your post.
You can follow the steps in this
document to backup and restore TFS 2010 databases to the new TFS 2013’S SQL Server, then run the Upgrade Wizard to configure your TFS 2013 Server. During the Upgrade Wizard, it will ask you provide the right SQL Server instance and Reporting Service, etc.
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey.
Similar Messages
-
TFS 2010 to TFS 2013 Migration stuck at step 13
Hi,
We've been trying to migrate our TFS 2010 collections to TFS 2013, but we always get stuck at Step 13 of 793. We tried 3x already. For the first try we waited around 8 hours, and decided to just restart. On the second try, we waited for more
than 13 hours and still no joy. And the third try is still going.
We are using Windows Server 2012 R2 for both Application Tier and SQL Server. Windows 2008 R2 for Sharepoint Server. SQL Server 2012 with SP1 Standard for the SQL Server.
Our TFS 2010 is a single server setup (Windows 2008 R2). And we are migrating now to a tiered architecture (a separate machine for sharepoint, another for SQL Server and another for the application tier). Could this be what's causing the 'stuck'?
I've followed the ALM rangers document, followed the requirements (i.e. Windows version, SQL Server version, etc), read articles from forums and I think we've done everything that we need to. Note that we tried migrating to TFS 2012 ages ago and it did
migrate successfully, but we're thinking TFS 2013 is available now so might as well go to TFS 2013. Do we need to migrate to TFS 2012 first? But that's what the documents say, TFS 2010 can be a direct migration to TFS 2013, right?
There are four collections in our TFS 2010, and the other three migrates fine. It's the DefaultCollection that is getting stuck. The default collection is around 170GB in size. When we did the migration to TFS 2012 before, it was 150GB in
size and finished in around 5 hours.
Can anyone let me know or point me to the right direction on how to address this issue? I've looked at the logs and can't see anything that stands out; no errors mentioned. Is there anything else that I could look at? Or is ther any profiling
that I can enable to see what might be causing the issue? I've searched google and only found a couple forums that has the same issue. One was resolved because of the Max Parallelism and we did that one as well but still no joy.
Appreciate any ideas. Thanks heaps.
Kindest regards,Hi,
Thanks for your post.
What's the result of your third try?
What's the document are you following?
From TFS upgrade requirements, You can upgrade TFS 2013 from Team Foundation Server 2010 directly.
If you’re using SQL Server 2012 with SP1, we recommend you also apply
cumulative update 2 on top of SP1 to address a critical SQL Server bug around resource consumption. This isn’t a hard requirement because the bug only affects a small number of instances, but we wanted you to be aware of it. If you don’t apply CU2, you
should apply a SQL Server hotfix (KB2793634) to addresses another (different) issue where SQL Server 2012 with SP1 might request an excessive amount of restarts.
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey. -
Could TFS 2013 build service connect to TFS 2010 server?
I am using the TFS 2010 since 2011, both TFS 2010 Server and TFS 2010 build service are installed on a separate Windows 2008 R2 x64 Server, I have application written in C# and .net 4.0 framework.
Recently, I want to upgrade the application to .net framework 4.5. I installed a Windows 2012 R2 x64 server and installed a TFS 2013 build service (since TFS 2010 build service doesn't support Windows 2012 R2 x64 server); however, the TFS
2013 build service seem to be not support the TFS 2010 server.
I need the old TFS 2010 build service to build the bug fix .net framework 4.0 (with other old dependency library) package for production and I need a new TFS 2013 build service to build the next version .net framework 4.5 (with upgrade dependency library) application.
Both new and old TFS build service have to be co-exist.
Does anyone know if it is possible to let TFS 2013 build service work with TFS 2010 server?
Or any suggestion on this scenario?Hi Panco,
Based on your description, you can use TFS 2010 build service to build the .net framework 4.0 and .net framework 4.5 applications. You need to install the corresponding dependencies on the bulid machine before building. And also build on the build machine
locally make sure you can build successfully locally before TFS build.
Since you already set up TFS 2013 build service, you can configure it to a team project collection in TFS 2010 to have a try. As far as I know, seems it's fine to do the building. If you have other considerations or concerns, please elaborate
more details about your scenario.
Best regards,
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey. -
BizTalk 2010 and BizTalk 2013 R2 on a single TFS 2010 build machine
Hello,
We are running two BizTalk environments ( BizTalk 2010 and BizTalk 2013 R2). All our BizTalk 2010 applications are using a single build machone on TFS 2010. We are planning to use the same build server for BizTalk 2013
R2 as well. As a prerequisite, we need to install the below two components,
1. .NET Framework 4.5
2. Microsoft BizTalk Server 2013 - Project Build Component (under Additional Software)
Will the single build server support BizTalk 2010 project build component and BizTalk 2013 R2 project build component. We don't want to have any conflict on the build server. Thanks in advance.Thanks for the answer. As its a dedicated build server, we are planning to install only the Project Build Components ( one is for BizTalk 2010 and another one is for BizTalk 2013 R2). We are not planning to install any of the other BizTalk server
components on the build server. Is that true that we can't even install multiple versions of project build components? Thanks in advance. -
After upgrade from TFS 2010 users cannot view source control
I recently did a in place of upgrade of TFS 2010 to TFS 2013. All of my users permissions stayed in tact. The users (contributors) cannot view any of the source control in either in VS 2010 or 2013. Since I am the administrator I
see everything and have no issue. Is there something that did not get brought over in the upgrade?Hi Rrenn49,
Thanks for your post.
You upgraded to TFS 2013 Update 4? There’s no any issue or warning during upgrade process?
What’s the detailed message they received when the contributors try to view source control files?
Please manually check the contributors group’s permissions on your TFS Source Control.
If you add a new user into your contributors group, this new user can access TFS Source Control correctly?
If you have any further research of this issue, please share your experience here.
We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
Click
HERE to participate the survey. -
TFS 2010 offline version control features
Hi Team,
Thanks in advance.
We are planning to upgrade TFS 2010 to TFS 2013 and duration will be 4 days.
During upgrade TFS 2010 will be down and users will work offline.
What all version control features users can perform(like edit file, rename file, shelve, label, Branch)?
After completion of upgrade will users able to checkin the code back to TFS 2013 without any issues?.
Please help us on above questions?
Best Regards,
MaheshObviously, if TFS is down, they can't do anything in TFS. They can edit files, but if the files were not checkout prior to the migration, they will need to check it out once TFS comes back again. (And they will need to flip the read-only bit manually.)
Users should also be advice to perform a Get Latest before you take down TFS, so they don't start to make changes in old versions.
Erland Sommarskog, SQL Server MVP, [email protected] -
Hello All,
Executed the following command in the SP 2013 management shell as administrator:
"Test-SPContentDatabase -Name WSS_CONTENT -WebApplication http://tfs2010"
Errors:
1. Category : MissingSetupFile
Error : True
UpgradeBlocking : False
Message : File [Features\ReportServer\ReportViewer.dwp] is referenced
[2] times in the database [WSS_CONTENT], but is not
installed on the current farm. Please install any
feature/solution which contains this file.
2. Category : MissingSetupFile
Error : True
UpgradeBlocking : False
Message : File [Features\TfsDashboardAgileReports\Reports\Report
Template.xltx] is referenced [2] times in the database
[WSS_CONTENT], but is not installed on the current farm.
Please install any feature/solution which contains this file.
3. Category : MissingSetupFile
Error : True
UpgradeBlocking : False
Message : File [Features\TfsDashboardCmmiReports\Reports\Report
Template.xltx] is referenced [2] times in the database
[WSS_CONTENT], but is not installed on the current farm.
Please install any feature/solution which contains this file.
4. Category : Configuration
Error : False
UpgradeBlocking : False
Message : The [SharePoint - 80] web application is configured with
claims authentication mode however the content database you
are trying to attach is intended to be used against a
windows classic authentication mode.
Tried for the error 4: New-SPWebApplication -Name "TFSWEBAPP" -ApplicationPool "SharePoint Web Services System" -AuthenticationMethod "NTLM" -ApplicationPoolAccount
(Get-SPManagedAccount "XXX\spservice") -Port 80 -URL "http://tfs2010
After executing the above command I was getting ">>",
didn't got any other reply for long time. Is there any power shell command to convert "claims mode" to "classic mode"
Can someone help on the above mentioned errors.
Thanks ,
RajukumarHi Charles,
Thanks for the reply.
Environment details:
OS: Windows server 2008 R2
Database: SQL Server 2008 R2
TFS: TFS 2010 with SP1
SharePoint: SharePoint 2010 with SP2
Upgrade Environment details:
OS: Windows server 2012
Database: SQL Server 2012 with SP1
TFS: TFS 2012
SharePoint: SharePoint 2013
Steps followed by me for upgradation:
1. Stopped all the services of TFS and IIS
2. Took backup of TFS and SP databases from SQL server
3. Installed the new environment and restored databsases to new Database server
4. Upgraded to TFS 2012
5. Installed and configured SP 2013
6. Upgraded to SP 2013
Go the errors mentioned in earlier message during up-gradation. I queried the files from ALLDOCS table of WSS_Content and deleted those.
7. Upgraded successfully with minor issues ( reports are not available for the old Team project in the report manager URL)
8. I updated the reports manually.
Question: Please let me know is there any script to update reports in all the team projects.
Thanks,
Rajukumar -
Hi
I hope to place this question in the proper forum but if not, can someone move it to the right forum. Thanks
I have a MOSS 2007 farm and I have 2 TFS 2010 SharePoint extension solution package (WSP) installed and working properly for a while now.
Microsoft.TeamFoundation.SharePoint.Dashboards.wsp and Microsoft.TeamFoundation.SharePoint.wsp
The Application team is going to upgrade their TFS 2010 server to TFS 2012 and want me to installed the new TFS 2012 SharePoint WSP solution to our MOSS farm.
My Question is that do I have to uninstall TFS 2010 solution package first or can I installed the new TFS 2012 solution packages in addition and both TFS 2010 and TFS 2012 solution package will co-exist and will work properly?
the reason i want to do this is making sure all existing TFS 2010 will still work. My concern is if I have to uninstall TFS 2010 solution just to get TFS 2012 solution then run into problem with existing TFS 2010 projects.
Thanks in advance for any advice or insight on this.
Swanl
SwanlHi Swanl,
you may check on the prequisite in sharepoint products,
"SharePoint Products: If you have a portal server, you might have to upgrade it to continue using SharePoint integration. We no longer support Windows SharePoint Services 3.0 or Microsoft Office SharePoint Server 2007. See
SharePoint Products requirements for Team Foundation Server."
Supported versions, editions
SharePoint Foundation 2013¹
SharePoint Server 2013,¹ (Enterprise or Standard edition)
SharePoint Foundation 2010²
SharePoint Server 2010,² (Enterprise or Standard edition)
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh667648.aspx
Regards,
Aries
Microsoft Online Community Support
Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” on the post that helps you, and to click “Unmark as Answer” if a marked post does not actually answer your question. This can be beneficial to other community members reading the thread. -
Transfert Team Project from TFS 2010 to Visual Studio Online
Hello,
I think about migrating to Visual Studio Online to use the online TFS or to migrate from TFS 2010 to TFS 2013.
My team is spread in 15 countries so, the visual studio online apear to be better.
Could you tell me if it's possible to import a Team Project and its history to Visual Studio Online ?
Thanks,
Laurentwell done....
http://www.soran.edu.iq -
Error while upgrading web application with SSRS from 2010 to 2013
I am trying to upgrade a site collection which has SSRS reports in it. When I run Test-SPContentDatabase
with database of SP2010 and the new web application of 2013 I obtain the errors:
Category : MissingWebPart
Error : True
UpgradeBlocking : False
Message : WebPart class [ab6d9dad-e23c-ce4f-ff98-f6575a1ccf4c] (class [
Microsoft.ReportingServices.SharePoint.UI.WebParts.ReportView
erWebPart] from assembly
[Microsoft.ReportingServices.SharePoint.UI.WebParts,
Version=10.0.0.0, Culture=neutral,
PublicKeyToken=89845dcd8080cc91]) is referenced [6] times in
the database [Areas_10100], but is not installed on the
current farm. Please install any feature/solution which
contains this web part.
Remedy : One or more web parts are referenced in the database
[Areas_10100], but are not installed on the current farm.
Please install any feature or solution which contains these
web parts.
Locations :
Category : MissingAssembly
Error : True
UpgradeBlocking : False
Message : Assembly
[Microsoft.ReportingServices.SharePoint.UI.ServerPages,
Version=10.50.0.0, Culture=neutral,
PublicKeyToken=89845dcd8080cc91] is referenced in the
database [Areas_10100], but is not installed on the current
farm. Please install any feature/solution which contains
this assembly.
Remedy : One or more assemblies are referenced in the database
[Areas_10100], but are not installed on the current farm.
Please install any feature or solution which contains these
assemblies.
Locations :
SSRS are configured in both farms (2010 and 2013). In 2010 farm is SSRS 2008 R2. In the environment of 2013 farm is SSRS 2012.
Any idea?Similar Thread:
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/sharepoint/en-US/68cc3179-8ed8-4435-b645-11f79f8bdc1f/upgrade-test-testspcontentdatabase-reporting-services-error?forum=sharepointadmin
This post is my own opinion and does not necessarily reflect the opinion or view of Slalom. -
Outlook 2010 and 2013 are unable to connect but OWA (and mail routing) works fine
Hi-
Not sure why but this past Sunday (just after DST adjustment) outlook clients (using 2010 and 2013) were unable to connect to an Exchange 2013 server. OWA and mail routing (internal and external) is working fine. I've even tried on multiple machines
and all of them experience the same issue. On a new machine with a fresh version of outlook 2013 installed here is what happens:
Click on Outlook 2013
Click Next until the account setup is displayed.
Name and email is auto-populated
Established network connection is good
Searching for email address settings is good (once the self-signed exchange 2013 cert is accepted)
And then the logging onto the mail server fails. The first pop-up is:
The Connection to Microsoft Exchange is unavailable. Outlook must be online or connected to complete this action.
Clicking "OK" is followed up with a window with the Microsoft Exchange connection info.
It lists Microsoft Exchange server which is populated with: GUID@<domain suffix>
Mailbox which is populated with: =SMTP:<Valid Email address>
On the Exchange Server I have noticed that the Web Management Service (WMSVC) is stopped and will not start. Starting the service outputs:
EventID 7024
"The Web Management Service terminated with the following service-specific error: Unspecified error"
Not really helpful :)
Since this is only happening with Outlook on multiple clients I'm expecting something with Exchange or the ability for outlook to connect to exchange.
Thanks in advance!Hi
I know this is an old post, but I'm having a very similar issue. I have CU6 installed and all other client connectivity apart from internal Outlook connectivity is working fine. I have distributed the new Self-Signed Certificate and the tested to verify
the clients trust it. I have tried on multiple machine with multiple accounts and none of them connect.
I'm at the stage of reinstalling, but I would rather troubleshoot the problem, just in case ever hit the same wall in the future. I have run Test-OutlookConnectivity with the following output;
RunspaceId : 71f8d740-c499-4bbe-8baf-9cbb12566fb8
Server : PW-SC-01.companyname.local
MonitorIdentity : Outlook.Protocol\OutlookRpcDeepTestProbe\NEW2013
RequestId : 75641e34-aa49-4fce-aad7-181b56dd7b29
ExecutionStartTime : 10/11/2014 13:50:03
ExecutionEndTime : 10/11/2014 13:50:03
Error : Error 0x6ba (The RPC server is unavailable) from ClientAsyncCallState.CheckCompletion:
RpcAsyncCompleteCall
EEInfo: ComputerName: n/a
EEInfo: ProcessID: 14544
EEInfo: Generation Time: 2014-11-10 13:50:03.737
EEInfo: Generating component: 2
EEInfo: Status: 0x000006BA
EEInfo: Detection location: 1710
EEInfo: Flags: 0
EEInfo: NumberOfParameters: 1
EEInfo: prm[0]: Long val: 0 (0x00000000)
EEInfo: ComputerName: n/a
EEInfo: ProcessID: 14544
EEInfo: Generation Time: 2014-11-10 13:50:03.737
EEInfo: Generating component: 13
EEInfo: Status: 0x000006BA
EEInfo: Detection location: 1352
EEInfo: Flags: 0
EEInfo: NumberOfParameters: 1
EEInfo: prm[0]: Long val: -1073606646 (0xC002100A)
EEInfo: ComputerName: n/a
EEInfo: ProcessID: 14544
EEInfo: Generation Time: 2014-11-10 13:50:03.737
EEInfo: Generating component: 14
EEInfo: Status: 0xC002100A
EEInfo: Detection location: 1380
EEInfo: Flags: 0
EEInfo: NumberOfParameters: 2
EEInfo: prm[0]: Long val: 12175 (0x00002F8F)
EEInfo: prm[1]: Unicode string: /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?PW-SC-01.companyname.local:6001
EEInfo: ComputerName: n/a
EEInfo: ProcessID: 14544
EEInfo: Generation Time: 2014-11-10 13:50:03.737
EEInfo: Generating component: 14
EEInfo: Status: 0x00010000
EEInfo: Detection location: 1385
EEInfo: Flags: 0
EEInfo: NumberOfParameters: 2
EEInfo: prm[0]: Long val: 8 (0x00000008)
EEInfo: prm[1]: Binary Buffer: [48-1263-10248-1262-126-9632122164676121-3988104-118-11373-61-94
-111-112-98-1217048136942-12272-122-91311550483449324830638543192311910198979999101115115461121199
91111091091154699111461171074830231349524949485349505348484990231349574949485349505348484990483449
324830638543192311910198979999101115115461121199911110910911546991114611710748-12613448136942-1227
2-122-913111503-126115048-1261102-126110-22103-15-109-16-121-119-3121-4-106119-119-9369122-5779121
719-98-24-67-32918-98-236-19-10715326827-76102-61100108-12718-438331-37109-102-57-9942-11389-10374
-77-5-4-107109-11847342222-63-48-7468-17-1067033-56111-33-54-16-105-62-76-1282011-1664-12158-4915-
88-53-9-29-2994-49-54-5211-1364-212121-12396-127-353-396185117-681229-434246070-109818119-4858-128
-106-1279248-49110-44-81-121494199-118-17-106-71106828294-93-110-110-106-415084-127126-45-12331421
-61-2757-24-128-28-25111-52113121-56-98-5821527282-47255245104-111-55-1099747-115-11172-287-12526-
79-12430-119421360-107-6430-5410282-52-51-128533354-116672757-77-75-111-72-118-10114-84484825-40-1
8-70-24-9111-61-5391-8034125-12632-16-19-128112030-8-427523101-93-127-5348-127-5648146385291511-14
4325-9648-127-110638529174-127-11848-127-121-12623119101989799991011151154611211999111109109115469
911146117107-1262211211945115994548494611211999111109109115461081119997108-12626651171161116810511
59911111810111446808767111109109115461081119997108-12626651171161116810511599111118101114468087671
11109109115469911146117107-12613808767111109109115461081119997108-12613808767111109109115469911146
11710748196385293741248106843615573148126385291911-14248048136942-12272-122-913115503-12611081-930
6613-74953718-12745-14-25-94107-80-5-45-2231536-1728-12897-8587577-1252765-892896-83-10267-7926-20
-9841-1079-12-29-4315671111357-684036-40-5129-91-24-461066-12306-65-9118-89115191071-30-20-1067161
-83-91-74105-931649-48-96126-13-71-118-8967567-40-64-104-113-31-51-102357125100-50113-103-113123-9
873-627067-25-908-10131118125122-71-115-37-1850-1055851-31410-77-7312-36848124-26104-10711043-2048
-48-12666611759121127-2960-1571-9-95-98-1036911610-74221-32-25114-108749933-7147562114-3635-101-81
-1058-73108-61-78-128-116-715155112714-37-18-84-8331-2716-1174257-76-5-1598-15-12875-98-7329632178
-10714-123-6312212-1028359-56-76-683-873987-2120-845954-7617-71-57999828110], size=926
Exception : Microsoft.Exchange.Rpc.ServerUnavailableException: Error 0x6ba (The RPC server is unavailable)
from ClientAsyncCallState.CheckCompletion: RpcAsyncCompleteCall
EEInfo: ComputerName: n/a
EEInfo: ProcessID: 14544
EEInfo: Generation Time: 2014-11-10 13:50:03.737
EEInfo: Generating component: 2
EEInfo: Status: 0x000006BA
EEInfo: Detection location: 1710
EEInfo: Flags: 0
EEInfo: NumberOfParameters: 1
EEInfo: prm[0]: Long val: 0 (0x00000000)
EEInfo: ComputerName: n/a
EEInfo: ProcessID: 14544
EEInfo: Generation Time: 2014-11-10 13:50:03.737
EEInfo: Generating component: 13
EEInfo: Status: 0x000006BA
EEInfo: Detection location: 1352
EEInfo: Flags: 0
EEInfo: NumberOfParameters: 1
EEInfo: prm[0]: Long val: -1073606646 (0xC002100A)
EEInfo: ComputerName: n/a
EEInfo: ProcessID: 14544
EEInfo: Generation Time: 2014-11-10 13:50:03.737
EEInfo: Generating component: 14
EEInfo: Status: 0xC002100A
EEInfo: Detection location: 1380
EEInfo: Flags: 0
EEInfo: NumberOfParameters: 2
EEInfo: prm[0]: Long val: 12175 (0x00002F8F)
EEInfo: prm[1]: Unicode string: /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?PW-SC-01.companyname.local:6001
EEInfo: ComputerName: n/a
EEInfo: ProcessID: 14544
EEInfo: Generation Time: 2014-11-10 13:50:03.737
EEInfo: Generating component: 14
EEInfo: Status: 0x00010000
EEInfo: Detection location: 1385
EEInfo: Flags: 0
EEInfo: NumberOfParameters: 2
EEInfo: prm[0]: Long val: 8 (0x00000008)
EEInfo: prm[1]: Binary Buffer: [48-1263-10248-1262-126-9632122164676121-3988104-118-11373-61-94
-111-112-98-1217048136942-12272-122-91311550483449324830638543192311910198979999101115115461121199
91111091091154699111461171074830231349524949485349505348484990231349574949485349505348484990483449
324830638543192311910198979999101115115461121199911110910911546991114611710748-12613448136942-1227
2-122-913111503-126115048-1261102-126110-22103-15-109-16-121-119-3121-4-106119-119-9369122-5779121
719-98-24-67-32918-98-236-19-10715326827-76102-61100108-12718-438331-37109-102-57-9942-11389-10374
-77-5-4-107109-11847342222-63-48-7468-17-1067033-56111-33-54-16-105-62-76-1282011-1664-12158-4915-
88-53-9-29-2994-49-54-5211-1364-212121-12396-127-353-396185117-681229-434246070-109818119-4858-128
-106-1279248-49110-44-81-121494199-118-17-106-71106828294-93-110-110-106-415084-127126-45-12331421
-61-2757-24-128-28-25111-52113121-56-98-5821527282-47255245104-111-55-1099747-115-11172-287-12526-
79-12430-119421360-107-6430-5410282-52-51-128533354-116672757-77-75-111-72-118-10114-84484825-40-1
8-70-24-9111-61-5391-8034125-12632-16-19-128112030-8-427523101-93-127-5348-127-5648146385291511-14
4325-9648-127-110638529174-127-11848-127-121-12623119101989799991011151154611211999111109109115469
911146117107-1262211211945115994548494611211999111109109115461081119997108-12626651171161116810511
59911111810111446808767111109109115461081119997108-12626651171161116810511599111118101114468087671
11109109115469911146117107-12613808767111109109115461081119997108-12613808767111109109115469911146
11710748196385293741248106843615573148126385291911-14248048136942-12272-122-913115503-12611081-930
6613-74953718-12745-14-25-94107-80-5-45-2231536-1728-12897-8587577-1252765-892896-83-10267-7926-20
-9841-1079-12-29-4315671111357-684036-40-5129-91-24-461066-12306-65-9118-89115191071-30-20-1067161
-83-91-74105-931649-48-96126-13-71-118-8967567-40-64-104-113-31-51-102357125100-50113-103-113123-9
873-627067-25-908-10131118125122-71-115-37-1850-1055851-31410-77-7312-36848124-26104-10711043-2048
-48-12666611759121127-2960-1571-9-95-98-1036911610-74221-32-25114-108749933-7147562114-3635-101-81
-1058-73108-61-78-128-116-715155112714-37-18-84-8331-2716-1174257-76-5-1598-15-12875-98-7329632178
-10714-123-6312212-1028359-56-76-683-873987-2120-845954-7617-71-57999828110], size=926
at Microsoft.Exchange.Rpc.ClientAsyncCallState.CheckCompletion()
at Microsoft.Exchange.Rpc.ExchangeClient.ClientAsyncCallState_Connect.End(IntPtr&
contextHandle, TimeSpan& pollsMax, Int32& retryCount, TimeSpan& retryDelay, String& dn
PoisonedCount : 0
ExecutionId : 63105129
SampleValue : 33.5194
ExecutionContext : Mailbox logon verification
EMSMDB.Connect()
Task produced output:
- TaskStarted = 10/11/2014 13:50:03
- TaskFinished = 10/11/2014 13:50:03
- Exception = Microsoft.Exchange.Rpc.ServerUnavailableException: Error 0x6ba (The RPC
server is unavailable) from ClientAsyncCallState.CheckCompletion: RpcAsyncCompleteCall
EEInfo: ComputerName: n/a
EEInfo: ProcessID: 14544
EEInfo: Generation Time: 2014-11-10 13:50:03.737
EEInfo: Generating component: 2
EEInfo: Status: 0x000006BA
EEInfo: Detection location: 1710
EEInfo: Flags: 0
EEInfo: NumberOfParameters: 1
EEInfo: prm[0]: Long val: 0 (0x00000000)
EEInfo: ComputerName: n/a
EEInfo: ProcessID: 14544
EEInfo: Generation Time: 2014-11-10 13:50:03.737
EEInfo: Generating component: 13
EEInfo: Status: 0x000006BA
EEInfo: Detection location: 1352
EEInfo: Flags: 0
EEInfo: NumberOfParameters: 1
EEInfo: prm[0]: Long val: -1073606646 (0xC002100A)
EEInfo: ComputerName: n/a
EEInfo: ProcessID: 14544
EEInfo: Generation Time: 2014-11-10 13:50:03.737
EEInfo: Generating component: 14
EEInfo: Status: 0xC002100A
EEInfo: Detection location: 1380
EEInfo: Flags: 0
EEInfo: NumberOfParameters: 2
EEInfo: prm[0]: Long val: 12175 (0x00002F8F)
EEInfo: prm[1]: Unicode string: /rpc/rpcproxy.dll?PW-SC-01.companyname.local:6001
EEInfo: ComputerName: n/a
EEInfo: ProcessID: 14544
EEInfo: Generation Time: 2014-11-10 13:50:03.737
EEInfo: Generating component: 14
EEInfo: Status: 0x00010000
EEInfo: Detection location: 1385
EEInfo: Flags: 0
EEInfo: NumberOfParameters: 2
EEInfo: prm[0]: Long val: 8 (0x00000008)
EEInfo: prm[1]: Binary Buffer: [48-1263-10248-1262-126-9632122164676121-3988104-118-11373-61-94
-111-112-98-1217048136942-12272-122-91311550483449324830638543192311910198979999101115115461121199
91111091091154699111461171074830231349524949485349505348484990231349574949485349505348484990483449
324830638543192311910198979999101115115461121199911110910911546991114611710748-12613448136942-1227
2-122-913111503-126115048-1261102-126110-22103-15-109-16-121-119-3121-4-106119-119-9369122-5779121
719-98-24-67-32918-98-236-19-10715326827-76102-61100108-12718-438331-37109-102-57-9942-11389-10374
-77-5-4-107109-11847342222-63-48-7468-17-1067033-56111-33-54-16-105-62-76-1282011-1664-12158-4915-
88-53-9-29-2994-49-54-5211-1364-212121-12396-127-353-396185117-681229-434246070-109818119-4858-128
-106-1279248-49110-44-81-121494199-118-17-106-71106828294-93-110-110-106-415084-127126-45-12331421
-61-2757-24-128-28-25111-52113121-56-98-5821527282-47255245104-111-55-1099747-115-11172-287-12526-
79-12430-119421360-107-6430-5410282-52-51-128533354-116672757-77-75-111-72-118-10114-84484825-40-1
8-70-24-9111-61-5391-8034125-12632-16-19-128112030-8-427523101-93-127-5348-127-5648146385291511-14
4325-9648-127-110638529174-127-11848-127-121-12623119101989799991011151154611211999111109109115469
911146117107-1262211211945115994548494611211999111109109115461081119997108-12626651171161116810511
59911111810111446808767111109109115461081119997108-12626651171161116810511599111118101114468087671
11109109115469911146117107-12613808767111109109115461081119997108-12613808767111109109115469911146
11710748196385293741248106843615573148126385291911-14248048136942-12272-122-913115503-12611081-930
6613-74953718-12745-14-25-94107-80-5-45-2231536-1728-12897-8587577-1252765-892896-83-10267-7926-20
-9841-1079-12-29-4315671111357-684036-40-5129-91-24-461066-12306-65-9118-89115191071-30-20-1067161
-83-91-74105-931649-48-96126-13-71-118-8967567-40-64-104-113-31-51-102357125100-50113-103-113123-9
873-627067-25-908-10131118125122-71-115-37-1850-1055851-31410-77-7312-36848124-26104-10711043-2048
-48-12666611759121127-2960-1571-9-95-98-1036911610-74221-32-25114-108749933-7147562114-3635-101-81
-1058-73108-61-78-128-116-715155112714-37-18-84-8331-2716-1174257-76-5-1598-15-12875-98-7329632178
-10714-123-6312212-1028359-56-76-683-873987-2120-845954-7617-71-57999828110], size=926
at Microsoft.Exchange.Rpc.ClientAsy
FailureContext :
ExtensionXml :
ResultType : Failed
RetryCount : 0
ResultName : 75641e34aa494fceaad7181b56dd7b29-OutlookRpcDeepTestProbe/NEW2013
IsNotified : False
ResultId : 1748063
ServiceName : InvokeNow
StateAttribute1 : Momt
StateAttribute2 : UnknownIssue
StateAttribute3 : PW-SC-01.companyname.local
StateAttribute4 : Unknown
StateAttribute5 : {C54AD38D-1E00-4F53-ABAE-26518C3FF82F}
StateAttribute6 : 0
StateAttribute7 : 0
StateAttribute8 : 0
StateAttribute9 : 0
StateAttribute10 : 0
StateAttribute11 : Momt
StateAttribute12 :
StateAttribute13 : VgEAVAdXaW5kb3dzQwBBCEtlcmJlcm9zTA9QV0NPTU1TXG5hdGhhbmhVLlMtMS01LTIxLTIwNTc0OTEwMzItMzE4NDA2NDk3OC
0xNTQ2MTE0ODM1LTI2MzJHHQAAAAcAAAAtUy0xLTUtMjEtMjA1NzQ5MTAzMi0zMTg0MDY0OTc4LTE1NDYxMTQ4MzUtNTEzBwAA
AAdTLTEtMS0wBwAAAAdTLTEtNS0yBwAAAAhTLTEtNS0xMQcAAAAIUy0xLTUtMTUHAADAE1MtMS01LTUtMC0zNDc3ODcxMTMHAA
AALlMtMS01LTIxLTIwNTc0OTEwMzItMzE4NDA2NDk3OC0xNTQ2MTE0ODM1LTQxODcHAAAALVMtMS01LTIxLTIwNTc0OTEwMzIt
MzE4NDA2NDk3OC0xNTQ2MTE0ODM1LTUxMgcAAAAuUy0xLTUtMjEtMjA1NzQ5MTAzMi0zMTg0MDY0OTc4LTE1NDYxMTQ4MzUtND
E3NAcAAAAuUy0xLTUtMjEtMjA1NzQ5MTAzMi0zMTg0MDY0OTc4LTE1NDYxMTQ4MzUtMzU3MAcAAAAuUy0xLTUtMjEtMjA1NzQ5
MTAzMi0zMTg0MDY0OTc4LTE1NDYxMTQ4MzUtNDEyMgcAAAAuUy0xLTUtMjEtMjA1NzQ5MTAzMi0zMTg0MDY0OTc4LTE1NDYxMT
Q4MzUtMTE2NAcAAAAuUy0xLTUtMjEtMjA1NzQ5MTAzMi0zMTg0MDY0OTc4LTE1NDYxMTQ4MzUtMTE0MQcAAAAuUy0xLTUtMjEt
MjA1NzQ5MTAzMi0zMTg0MDY0OTc4LTE1NDYxMTQ4MzUtNDE1MwcAAAAuUy0xLTUtMjEtMjA1NzQ5MTAzMi0zMTg0MDY0OTc4LT
E1NDYxMTQ4MzUtNDE0NQcAAAAtUy0xLTUtMjEtMjA1NzQ5MTAzMi0zMTg0MDY0OTc4LTE1NDYxMTQ4MzUtNTE4BwAAAC5TLTEt
NS0yMS0yMDU3NDkxMDMyLTMxODQwNjQ5NzgtMTU0NjEx
StateAttribute14 :
StateAttribute15 :
StateAttribute16 : 0
StateAttribute17 : 0
StateAttribute18 : 0
StateAttribute19 : 0
StateAttribute20 : 0
StateAttribute21 : /o=companyname/ou=first administrative group/cn=Recipients/cn=NathanH
StateAttribute22 : EMSMDB.Connect()
StateAttribute23 : https://pw-sc-01.companyname.local:444/rpc/rpcproxy.dll?PW-SC-01.companyname.local:6001
StateAttribute24 : Negotiate
StateAttribute25 : [33]10/11/2014 13:50:03 [FAILED!] EMSMDB.Connect();
Identity : fcd6159dd8fe42aebf10100cc4934356
IsValid : True
ObjectState : New -
How do I know what are custome code deployed on my site for Migration from 2010 to 2013
We have around 500 sites and several Webapplication. Now we want to migrate site from SharePoint 2010 to 2013
We will use Metalogix tool for Migration. However we want to know which custom changes site Have , SO those WSP we can deployed on 2013, So that Site will work fine After Migration.
SO question is there is any way where I can find what customization site have ?
I want poweshell which will tell me these WSP have deployed on this Sitecollection , SO that only those I will deploy on 2013 ? ALso
Suppose I have created Workflows through designer , is there any powershell which will tell me these workflow have deployed on particular site, so that I can check is those Migrated successfully or not.
Please mark answer , if you think answer is helpful or correct.Hi,
Please see the link below that will give you detailed steps to identify customizations
Checklist for upgrade
Cheers
FrenchSpeaker - MCTS -
Graphic issues in Word 2010 and 2013
The problem is it reformats your original image to fall within this shape below. Everything within that triangle is white and your original image only shows through the remaining part of the oval. I have attached a Word document with a few examples. It cuts
off part of the logo, signatures, etc.
So far, we have found this occurring in 2 situations:
1. .docx is generated in third party application. We open this in Word 2003 and save as .doc. Then if that .doc is then opened by someone else using Word 2010 or 2013, it has this issue.
2. The other situation was just a .doc created (outside of the third party application) that is used as a VBA component. If they open that .doc in Word 2013 it has this issue but other .doc files are fine.
One other note, we can open these files in Word 2003 and 2007 and the images look fine. It only happens when opening in Word 2010 or 2013.
Has anyone experienced this or have any suggestions? I have tested both .tif & .jpg to see if the original image format made a difference and it doesn’t appear to. Unfortunately, it’s impacting tens of thousands of Word docs stored in archive.
I don't see where I could upload a file, but I do have example documents.
Thanks,
DawnHi Dawn:
After testing from myside, I found if you
change the picture format, it will fix the display issue. You can
manually changing the format of the Graphic: select the graphic->select format tab on the Ribbon->change to any format you want. You can also
use VBA code to change the format of the picture, for detailed information you can refer to
This article.
Below are some findings for your reference.
I checked the documents you sent to me, as the issue occurred when if the file saved as .docx or opened with word 2010/2013, so I zipped the file and compared the xml files, I found something
might be the cause of this issue.
The pictures in media folder were all fine no missing parts even for those ones displayed wrongly in Word.
I compared the document.xml file under ….\Graphic issue\Issue.docx\word(where I stored the zip file), I found the documents.xml of issue.docx file has section called <a:custGeom>………
</a:custGeom>, which contains data like below, maybe it’s inherited from the design tool, somehow, change formatting can get rid of the custGeom. So we suggest you change the format of
the picture.
Definition of
custGeom (Custom Geometry)This element specifies the existence of a custom geometric shape.
Detailed Defination
-<a:custGeom>
<a:avLst/>
-<a:gdLst>
<a:gd name="G0" fmla="+- 0 0 0"/>
<a:gd name="G1" fmla="+- 0 0 0"/>
<a:gd name="G2" fmla="+- 0 0 0"/>
<a:gd name="G3" fmla="+- 10800 0 0"/>
<a:gd name="G4" fmla="+- 0 0 0"/>
<a:gd name="T0" fmla="*/ 360 256 1"/>
<a:gd name="T1" fmla="*/ 0 256 1"/>
<a:gd name="G5" fmla="+- G2 T0 T1"/>
<a:gd name="G6" fmla="?: G2 G2 G5"/>
<a:gd name="G7" fmla="+- 0 0 G6"/>
<a:gd name="G8" fmla="+- 0 0 0"/>
<a:gd name="G9" fmla="+- 0 0 0"/>
………………………same type of data………………………………………
<a:gd name="T31" fmla="*/ 10800 h 21600"/>
<a:gd name="T32" fmla="*/ 10800 w 21600"/><a:gd name="T33" fmla="*/ 10800 h 21600"/>
<a:gd name="T34" fmla="*/ 3163 w 21600"/>
<a:gd name="T35" fmla="*/ 3163 h 21600"/>
<a:gd name="T36" fmla="*/ 18437 w 21600"/>
<a:gd name="T37" fmla="*/ 18437 h 21600"/></a:gdLst><a:ahLst/>
-<a:cxnLst>
-<a:cxn ang="0"><a:pos y="T5" x="T4"/></a:cxn>
-<a:cxn ang="0"><a:pos y="T7" x="T6"/></a:cxn>
-<a:cxn ang="0"><a:pos y="T9" x="T8"/></a:cxn>
-<a:cxn ang="0"><a:pos y="T11" x="T10"/></a:cxn>
-<a:cxn ang="0"><a:pos y="T13" x="T12"/></a:cxn>
-<a:cxn ang="0"><a:pos y="T15" x="T14"/></a:cxn>
-<a:cxn ang="0"><a:pos y="T17" x="T16"/></a:cxn>
-<a:cxn ang="0"><a:pos y="T19" x="T18"/></a:cxn>
-<a:cxn ang="0"><a:pos y="T21" x="T20"/></a:cxn>
-<a:cxn ang="0"><a:pos y="T23" x="T22"/></a:cxn>
-<a:cxn ang="0"><a:pos y="T25" x="T24"/></a:cxn>
-<a:cxn ang="0"><a:pos y="T27" x="T26"/></a:cxn>
-<a:cxn ang="0"><a:pos y="T29" x="T28"/></a:cxn>
-<a:cxn ang="0">
<a:pos y="T31" x="T30"/>
</a:cxn>
-<a:cxn ang="0">
<a:pos y="T33" x="T32"/>
</a:cxn>
</a:cxnLst>
<a:rect r="T36" b="T37" t="T35" l="T34"/>
+<a:pathLst>
</a:custGeom> -
Exchange 2010 to 2013 Migration: Authentication/Proxy Settings Issue
I'm in the final stages of preparing for our Exchange 2010 to 2013 migration. I'm noticing minor authentication issues on mobile devices (android & ios) and proxy setting issues with Outlook that require user intervention. In an effort to make the migration
as smooth as possible for our internal users, I'd like to get these settings ironed out before starting the migration.
Symptoms:
Outlook - I'm aware that internal Outlook usage has changed its connection protocol from RCP/TCP to RCP/HTTP, but it appears that Outlook isn't updating its settings in the "Microsoft Exchange Proxy Settings" after a users mailbox has been migrated
from 2010 to 2013. Currently, 2010 users with Outlook 2013 have the following settings configured in Outlook's Exchange Proxy Settings:
URL to connect to my proxy server for Exchange: webmail.domain.com
Connect using SSL only: Checked
Only connect to proxy servers that have this principal name in their certificates: Unchecked
On fast networks, connect using HTTP first, then connect using TCP/IP: Unchecked
On slow networks, connect using HTTP first, then connect using TCP/IP: Checked
After migrating a user's mailbox from 2010 to 2013, the above settings remain the same in Outlook and their client disconnects from Exchange and isn't able to reconnect. After manually enabling the checkbox for "On fast networks, connect using HTTP
first, then connect using TCP/IP", Outlook clients are able to connect to Exchange via their newly migrated mailbox.
Is there a way to automatically updating these 2 proxy settings in Outlook during the migration instead of having to manually change each user's configuration in Outlook?
Android & iOS - Currently, users on Android & iOS with Exchange 2010 mailboxes have the following configuration:
domain: blank
username: their AD username
server: webmail.domain.com
After migrating a mobile users mailbox from 2010 to 2013, neither OS (Android or iOS) is able to connect due to an authentication failure. On iOS, if I manually change the domain from blank to my company's domain, authentication succeeds and their 2013 mailbox
begins to update. On Android, the option to change the domain name from null is grayed out, requiring the user to delete the Exchange profile and re-add it with the domain name intact. Is there a way to configure Exchange 2013 to not require the domain name
for mobile users in the same way that it's been working for us with Exchange 2010?
Please let me know if you require cmdlet print outs of my virtual directories to help troubleshoot the issue.Hi,
Generally, when the user mailbox is moved from Exchange 2010 to Exchange 2013, the Autodiscover service would detect the changes and update the new configuration automatically.
Please make sure the autodiscover service in your new Exchange 2013 is configured correctly. We can create a new mailbox in Exchange 2013 and check whether the new Exchange 2013 user can setup account successfully in Outlook or not. If the new user works
fine, it indicates the autodiscover service in Exchange 2013 should be proper for internal user.
Please restart the following Exchange service to have a try:
Microsoft Exchange RPC Client Access
Microsoft Exchange Mailbox Replication
Restart IIS service by running IISReset in a Command Prompt window.
Then check whether the Outlook client can connect to Exchange 2013 or not.
As for Android & iOS issue, I suggest we can ask a question in ActiveSync forum for more suggestion:
https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/home?forum=exchangesvrmobility
Regards,
Winnie Liang
TechNet Community Support -
How to enable the SharePoint 2010 and 2013 Developer Dashboard for specific Web Application or Site collection(not for all Web Application)?
Vishal GoyalHi Vishal,
I don't think there is option for specific site collection or web application,but there is option of enabling developer dashboard on specific master pages and that is one on of the way you could do it.
look article on below link to enable developer dashboard on specific master pages
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/office/ff512745%28v=office.14%29.aspx?f=255&MSPPError=-2147217396
Let me know if this helps.
Thanks
Bhism
Maybe you are looking for
-
Issue in schedule lines on sales order
Hi all, While creating a sales order, system is creating schedule lines after two days of order creation. I want that schedule lines should be created for the same date. Please suggest that what should I do for this? Please respond. Best Regards, AI.
-
Are Virtual Copies saved in Backups? How do I insert a backup into an existing catalog?
Are Virtual Copies saved in Backups? How do I insert a backup into an existing catalog I deleted a tif image file that I didn't intend to, which had several LR virtual copies created from it. The virtual copies had a lot of important history that doc
-
Digital Signature feature not working
Using Acrobat 10.1.12, the document sign feature is grayed-out. I have digitally signed countless documents using this feature. Any suggestions?
-
Calling an RFC from an EJB over an Enterprise Connector
Hi all, I would like to call an RFC enabled Function Modul (FuBa) from a BW-System over an EJB in a Web AS environment bei passing SAP Logon Ticket. To achive this goal, i've generated proxy classes (Enterprise Connector) via NWDS . If i call enterp
-
Third Party Tool-Open Hub Destination
dear all, can any one guide me as to how data(master data in particular) from bw can be transferred to oracle data base using open hub destiantion.is rfc connection between bw and third part tool enough,do we have to maintain the same stru