The best platform for Data Services / Integrator / Quality

Based upon the deployments of other customers, which combination of operating system and platform provides the most stable & reliable environment for Data Services / Data Integrator / Data Quality?

Windows is the platform most commonly used, so bugs are fixed faster there.
Unix is released usually a few months after the initial Windows version with all the fixes in it. Unix is commonly used by larger companies who would not accept any downtime.
Keep in mind, there is no Unix codeline of the product, all is the same source code just compiled differently.

Similar Messages

Whats is the Best platform for CiscoWorks installation.

Hello,
Please advise whats the best platform for CiscoWorks installation. We are currently using the windows 2003 32-bit and CiscoWorks is slow.
We are currently using the LMS 3.2, RME 4.3.0, CM 5.2.1
THANKS

We are using 2008 R2 for LMS 4.0.1 - runs great - need loads of RAM and page file but we have not had many challenges. Java seems to run away with memory at times and we cycle out the services but it runs great.

What is the best platform for Oracle Server?

What is the best platform for Oracle Server?
What is your criterion?
Thanks,
Somsak B.

I believe that Oracle is developed and coded on a Solaris
platform and then ported to other operating systems. If that is
the case, you can assume that Solaris is the best platform or at
least the safest in terms of performance and risk.
If anyone knows anything to the contrary, pls correct me.

WHat is the best platform for SAP EP ?

Experts
Can any one help to share some information about what is the best platform for portal ?
Windows or UNIX
I have personally seen most of the customers are using windows as thier OS for Portal. When it comes to R3 BW SRM CRM and other application,its UNIX.
Interms of Performance , Windows is not right choice . I am not sure about life cycle management for the Windows.
A big advantage of using Windows hosting is that.NET technologies: ASP. NET, VB.NET easily works on these Hosts. If, the website is built using these technologies then opting a Windows server is most suitable
Microsoft Sharepoint is yet another application, which needs exclusive, Windows hosting. The only option available for users using this application is Windows server
Appreciate your inputs
Regards
Karthi

Do not double post!
Markus

The best practice for data archiving

Hi
My client has been using OnDemand for almost 2 years, there are around 2M records in the system(Activities), so just want to know what is the best practice of data archiving, we dont care much about the data in the 6 month ago.

Hi Erik,
Archival is nothing but deletion.
Create a backup cube in BW. Copy the data from your planning cube to the backup cube, and then delete that data region from your planning cube.
Archival will definitely improve the performance of your templates, scripts, etc; since the system will now search from a smaller dataset.
Hope this helps.

What are the best solutions for data warehouse configuration in 10gR2

I need help on solutions to be provided to my Client for upgrading the data warehouse.
Current Configuration: Oracle database 9.2.0.8. This database contains the data warehouse and one more data mart on the same host.Sizes are respectively 6 Terabyte(retention policy of 3 years+current year) and 1 Terabyte. The ETL tool and BO Reporting tools are also hosted on the same host. This current configuration is really performing poor.
Client cannot go for a major architectural or configuration changes to its existing environment now due to some constraints.
However, they have agreed to separate out the databases on separate hosts from the ETL tools and BO objects. Also we are planning to upgrade the database to 10gR2 to attain stability, better performance and overcome current headaches.
We cannot upgrade the database to 11g as the BO is at a version 6.5 which isn't compatible with Oracle 11g. And Client cannot afford to upgrade anything else other than the database.
So, my role is very vital in providing a perfect solution towards better performance and take a successful migration of Oracle Database from one host to another (similar platform and OS) in addition to upgrade.
I have till now thought of the following:
Move the Oracle database and data mart to separate host.
The host will be the same platform, that is, HP Superdome with HP-UX 32-bit OS (we cannot change to 64-bit as ETL tool doesn't support)
Install new Oracle database 10g on the new host and move the data to it.
Exploring all new features of 10gR2 to help data warehouse, that is, SQL MODEL Clause introduction, Parallel processing, Partitioning, Data Pump, SPA to study pre and post migrations.
Also thinking of RAC to provide more better solution as our main motive is to show a tremendous performance enhancement.
I need all your help to prepare a good road map for my assignment. Please suggest.
Thanks,
Tapan

SGA=27.5 GB and PGA=50 MB
Also I am pasting part of STATSPACK Report, eliminating the snaps of DB bounce. Please suggest the scope of improvement in this case.
STATSPACK report for
Snap Id Snap Time Sessions Curs/Sess Comment
Begin Snap: 582946 11-Mar-13 20:02:16 46 12.8
End Snap: 583036 12-Mar-13 18:24:24 60 118.9
Elapsed: 1,342.13 (mins)
Cache Sizes (end)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Buffer Cache: 21,296M Std Block Size: 16K
Shared Pool Size: 6,144M Log Buffer: 16,384K
Load Profile
~~~~~~~~~~~~ Per Second Per Transaction
Redo size: 1,343,739.01 139,883.39
Logical reads: 100,102.54 10,420.69
Block changes: 3,757.42 391.15
Physical reads: 6,670.84 694.44
Physical writes: 874.34 91.02
User calls: 1,986.04 206.75
Parses: 247.87 25.80
Hard parses: 5.82 0.61
Sorts: 1,566.76 163.10
Logons: 10.99 1.14
Executes: 1,309.79 136.35
Transactions: 9.61
% Blocks changed per Read: 3.75 Recursive Call %: 43.34
Rollback per transaction %: 3.49 Rows per Sort: 190.61
Instance Efficiency Percentages (Target 100%)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Buffer Nowait %: 99.90 Redo NoWait %: 100.00
Buffer Hit %: 96.97 In-memory Sort %: 100.00
Library Hit %: 99.27 Soft Parse %: 97.65
Execute to Parse %: 81.08 Latch Hit %: 99.58
Parse CPU to Parse Elapsd %: 3.85 % Non-Parse CPU: 99.34
Shared Pool Statistics Begin End
Memory Usage %: 7.11 50.37
% SQL with executions>1: 62.31 46.46
% Memory for SQL w/exec>1: 26.75 13.47
Top 5 Timed Events
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ % Total
Event Waits Time (s) Ela Time
CPU time 492,062 43.66
db file sequential read 157,418,414 343,549 30.49
library cache pin 92,339 66,759 5.92
PX qref latch 63,635 43,845 3.89
db file scattered read 2,506,806 41,677 3.70
Background Wait Events for DB: P7IN1 Instance: P7IN1 Snaps: 582946 -583036
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc (idle events last)
Avg
Total Wait wait Waits
Event Waits Timeouts Time (s) (ms) /txn
log file sequential read 176,386 0 3,793 22 0.2
log file parallel write 2,685,833 0 1,813 1 3.5
db file parallel write 239,166 0 1,350 6 0.3
control file parallel write 33,432 0 79 2 0.0
LGWR wait for redo copy 478,120 536 75 0 0.6
rdbms ipc reply 10,027 0 47 5 0.0
control file sequential read 32,414 0 40 1 0.0
db file scattered read 4,101 0 30 7 0.0
db file sequential read 13,946 0 29 2 0.0
direct path read 203,694 0 14 0 0.3
log buffer space 363 0 13 37 0.0
latch free 3,766 0 9 2 0.0
direct path write 80,491 0 6 0 0.1
async disk IO 351,955 0 4 0 0.5
enqueue 28 0 1 21 0.0
buffer busy waits 1,281 0 1 0 0.0
log file single write 172 0 0 1 0.0
rdbms ipc message 10,563,204 251,286 992,837 94 13.7
pmon timer 34,751 34,736 78,600 2262 0.0
smon timer 7,462 113 76,463 10247 0.0
Instance Activity Stats for DB: P7IN1 Instance: P7IN1 Snaps: 582946 -583036
Statistic Total per Second per Trans
CPU used by this session 49,206,154 611.0 63.6
CPU used when call started 49,435,735 613.9 63.9
CR blocks created 6,740,777 83.7 8.7
Cached Commit SCN referenced 423,253,503 5,256.0 547.2
Commit SCN cached 19,165 0.2 0.0
DBWR buffers scanned 48,276,489 599.5 62.4
DBWR checkpoint buffers written 6,959,752 86.4 9.0
DBWR checkpoints 454 0.0 0.0
DBWR free buffers found 44,817,183 556.5 57.9
DBWR lru scans 137,149 1.7 0.2
DBWR make free requests 162,528 2.0 0.2
DBWR revisited being-written buff 4,220 0.1 0.0
DBWR summed scan depth 48,276,489 599.5 62.4
DBWR transaction table writes 5,036 0.1 0.0
DBWR undo block writes 2,989,436 37.1 3.9
DDL statements parallelized 3,723 0.1 0.0
DFO trees parallelized 4,157 0.1 0.0
DML statements parallelized 3 0.0 0.0
OS Block input operations 29,850 0.4 0.0
OS Block output operations 1,591 0.0 0.0
OS Characters read/written 182,109,814,791 2,261,447.1 235,416.9
OS Integral unshared data size ################## 242,463,432.4 ############
OS Involuntary context switches 188,257,786 2,337.8 243.4
OS Maximum resident set size 43,518,730,619 540,417.4 56,257.5
OS Page reclaims 159,430,953 1,979.8 206.1
OS Signals received 5,260,938 65.3 6.8
OS Socket messages received 79,438,383 986.5 102.7
OS Socket messages sent 93,064,176 1,155.7 120.3
OS System time used 10,936,430 135.8 14.1
OS User time used 132,043,884 1,639.7 170.7
OS Voluntary context switches 746,207,739 9,266.4 964.6
PX local messages recv'd 55,120,663 684.5 71.3
PX local messages sent 55,120,817 684.5 71.3
Parallel operations downgraded 1 3 0.0 0.0
Parallel operations not downgrade 4,154 0.1 0.0
SQL*Net roundtrips to/from client 155,422,335 1,930.0 200.9
SQL*Net roundtrips to/from dblink 18 0.0 0.0
active txn count during cleanout 16,529,551 205.3 21.4
background checkpoints completed 43 0.0 0.0
background checkpoints started 43 0.0 0.0
background timeouts 280,202 3.5 0.4
branch node splits 4,428 0.1 0.0
buffer is not pinned count 6,382,440,322 79,257.4 8,250.7
buffer is pinned count 9,675,661,370 120,152.8 12,507.9
bytes received via SQL*Net from c 67,384,496,376 836,783.4 87,109.3
bytes received via SQL*Net from d 6,142 0.1 0.0
bytes sent via SQL*Net to client 50,240,643,657 623,890.4 64,947.1
bytes sent via SQL*Net to dblink 3,701 0.1 0.0
calls to get snapshot scn: kcmgss 145,385,064 1,805.4 187.9
calls to kcmgas 36,816,132 457.2 47.6
calls to kcmgcs 3,514,770 43.7 4.5
change write time 369,373 4.6 0.5
cleanout - number of ktugct calls 20,954,488 260.2 27.1
cleanouts and rollbacks - consist 6,357,174 78.9 8.2
cleanouts only - consistent read 10,078,802 125.2 13.0
cluster key scan block gets 69,403,565 861.9 89.7
Instance Activity Stats for DB: P7IN1 Instance: P7IN1 Snaps: 582946 -583036
Statistic Total per Second per Trans
cluster key scans 41,311,211 513.0 53.4
commit cleanout failures: block l 413,776 5.1 0.5
commit cleanout failures: buffer 414 0.0 0.0
commit cleanout failures: callbac 41,194 0.5 0.1
commit cleanout failures: cannot 174,382 2.2 0.2
commit cleanouts 11,469,056 142.4 14.8
commit cleanouts successfully com 10,839,290 134.6 14.0
commit txn count during cleanout 17,155,424 213.0 22.2
consistent changes 145,418,277 1,805.8 188.0
consistent gets 8,043,252,188 99,881.4 10,397.7
consistent gets - examination 3,180,028,047 39,489.7 4,110.9
current blocks converted for CR 9 0.0 0.0
cursor authentications 14,926 0.2 0.0
data blocks consistent reads - un 143,706,500 1,784.6 185.8
db block changes 302,577,666 3,757.4 391.2
db block gets 336,562,217 4,179.4 435.1
deferred (CURRENT) block cleanout 2,912,793 36.2 3.8
dirty buffers inspected 627,174 7.8 0.8
enqueue conversions 1,296,337 16.1 1.7
enqueue releases 13,053,200 162.1 16.9
enqueue requests 13,239,092 164.4 17.1
enqueue timeouts 185,878 2.3 0.2
enqueue waits 114,120 1.4 0.2
exchange deadlocks 7,390 0.1 0.0
execute count 105,475,101 1,309.8 136.4
free buffer inspected 1,604,407 19.9 2.1
free buffer requested 258,126,047 3,205.4 333.7
hot buffers moved to head of LRU 22,793,576 283.1 29.5
immediate (CR) block cleanout app 16,436,010 204.1 21.3
immediate (CURRENT) block cleanou 2,860,013 35.5 3.7
index fast full scans (direct rea 12,375 0.2 0.0
index fast full scans (full) 3,733 0.1 0.0
index fast full scans (rowid rang 192,148 2.4 0.3
index fetch by key 1,321,024,486 16,404.5 1,707.7
index scans kdiixs1 406,165,684 5,043.8 525.1
leaf node 90-10 splits 50,373 0.6 0.1
leaf node splits 697,235 8.7 0.9
logons cumulative 884,756 11.0 1.1
messages received 3,276,719 40.7 4.2
messages sent 3,257,171 40.5 4.2
no buffer to keep pinned count 569 0.0 0.0
no work - consistent read gets 4,406,092,172 54,715.0 5,695.8
opened cursors cumulative 20,527,704 254.9 26.5
parse count (failures) 267,088 3.3 0.4
parse count (hard) 468,996 5.8 0.6
parse count (total) 19,960,548 247.9 25.8
parse time cpu 323,024 4.0 0.4
parse time elapsed 8,393,422 104.2 10.9
physical reads 537,189,332 6,670.8 694.4
physical reads direct 292,545,140 3,632.8 378.2
physical writes 70,409,002 874.3 91.0
physical writes direct 59,248,394 735.8 76.6
physical writes non checkpoint 69,103,391 858.1 89.3
pinned buffers inspected 11,893 0.2 0.0
prefetched blocks 95,892,161 1,190.8 124.0
prefetched blocks aged out before 1,495,883 18.6 1.9
Instance Activity Stats for DB: P7IN1 Instance: P7IN1 Snaps: 582946 -583036
Statistic Total per Second per Trans
process last non-idle time ################## ############## ############
queries parallelized 417 0.0 0.0
recursive calls 122,323,299 1,519.0 158.1
recursive cpu usage 3,144,533 39.1 4.1
redo blocks written 180,881,558 2,246.2 233.8
redo buffer allocation retries 5,400 0.1 0.0
redo entries 164,728,513 2,045.6 213.0
redo log space requests 1,006 0.0 0.0
redo log space wait time 2,230 0.0 0.0
redo ordering marks 2,563 0.0 0.0
redo size 108,208,614,904 1,343,739.0 139,883.4
redo synch time 558,520 6.9 0.7
redo synch writes 2,343,824 29.1 3.0
redo wastage 1,126,585,600 13,990.0 1,456.4
redo write time 718,655 8.9 0.9
redo writer latching time 7,763 0.1 0.0
redo writes 2,685,833 33.4 3.5
rollback changes - undo records a 522,742 6.5 0.7
rollbacks only - consistent read 335,177 4.2 0.4
rows fetched via callback 1,100,990,382 13,672.1 1,423.3
session connect time ################## ############## ############
session cursor cache count 1,061 0.0 0.0
session cursor cache hits 1,687,796 21.0 2.2
session logical reads 8,061,057,193 100,102.5 10,420.7
session pga memory 1,573,228,913,832 19,536,421.0 2,033,743.8
session pga memory max 1,841,357,626,496 22,866,054.4 2,380,359.0
session uga memory 1,074,114,630,336 13,338,399.4 1,388,529.0
session uga memory max 386,645,043,296 4,801,374.0 499,823.6
shared hash latch upgrades - no w 410,360,146 5,095.9 530.5
sorts (disk) 2,657 0.0 0.0
sorts (memory) 126,165,625 1,566.7 163.1
sorts (rows) 24,048,783,304 298,638.8 31,088.3
summed dirty queue length 5,438,201 67.5 7.0
switch current to new buffer 1,302,798 16.2 1.7
table fetch by rowid 6,201,503,534 77,010.5 8,016.8
table fetch continued row 26,649,697 330.9 34.5
table scan blocks gotten 1,864,435,032 23,152.6 2,410.2
table scan rows gotten 43,639,997,280 541,923.3 56,414.3
table scans (cache partitions) 26,112 0.3 0.0
table scans (direct read) 246,243 3.1 0.3
table scans (long tables) 340,200 4.2 0.4
table scans (rowid ranges) 359,617 4.5 0.5
table scans (short tables) 9,111,559 113.2 11.8
transaction rollbacks 4,819 0.1 0.0
transaction tables consistent rea 824 0.0 0.0
transaction tables consistent rea 1,386,848 17.2 1.8
user calls 159,931,913 1,986.0 206.8
user commits 746,543 9.3 1.0
user rollbacks 27,020 0.3 0.0
write clones created in backgroun 7 0.0 0.0
write clones created in foregroun 4,350 0.1 0.0
Buffer Pool Statistics for DB: P7IN1 Instance: P7IN1 Snaps: 582946 -583036
-> Standard block size Pools D: default, K: keep, R: recycle
-> Default Pools for other block sizes: 2k, 4k, 8k, 16k, 32k
Free Write Buffer
Number of Cache Buffer Physical Physical Buffer Complete Busy
P Buffers Hit % Gets Reads Writes Waits Waits Waits
D 774,144 95.6############ 233,869,082 10,089,734 0 0########
K 504,000 99.9############ 3,260,227 1,070,338 0 0 65,898
R 63,504 96.2 196,079,539 7,511,863 535 0 0 0
Buffer wait Statistics for DB: P7IN1 Instance: P7IN1 Snaps: 582946 -583036
-> ordered by wait time desc, waits desc
Tot Wait Avg
Class Waits Time (s) Time (ms)
data block 7,791,121 14,676 2
file header block 587 101 172
undo header 151,617 71 0
segment header 299,312 58 0
1st level bmb 45,235 7 0
bitmap index block 392 1 3
undo block 4,250 1 0
2nd level bmb 14 0 0
system undo header 2 0 0
3rd level bmb 1 0 0
Latch Activity for DB: P7IN1 Instance: P7IN1 Snaps: 582946 -583036
->"Get Requests", "Pct Get Miss" and "Avg Slps/Miss" are statistics for
willing-to-wait latch get requests
->"NoWait Requests", "Pct NoWait Miss" are for no-wait latch get requests
->"Pct Misses" for both should be very close to 0.0
Pct Avg Wait Pct
Get Get Slps Time NoWait NoWait
Latch Requests Miss /Miss (s) Requests Miss
Consistent RBA 2,686,230 0.0 0.2 0 0
FAL request queue 86 0.0 0 0
FAL subheap alocation 0 0 2 0.0
FIB s.o chain latch 1,089 0.0 0 0
FOB s.o list latch 4,589,986 0.5 0.0 2 0
NLS data objects 1 0.0 0 0
SQL memory manager worka 5,963 0.0 0 0
Token Manager 0 0 2 0.0
active checkpoint queue 719,439 0.3 0.1 0 1 0.0
alert log latch 184 0.0 0 2 0.0
archive control 4,365 0.0 0 0
archive process latch 1,808 0.6 0.6 0 0
begin backup scn array 3,387,572 0.0 0.0 0 0
cache buffer handles 1,577,222 0.2 0.0 0 0
cache buffers chains ############## 0.5 0.0 430 354,357,972 0.3
cache buffers lru chain 17,153,023 0.1 0.0 1 385,505,654 0.5
cas latch 538,804,153 0.3 0.0 7 0
channel handle pool latc 1,776,950 0.5 0.0 0 0
channel operations paren 2,901,371 0.3 0.0 0 0
checkpoint queue latch 99,329,722 0.0 0.0 0 11,153,369 0.1
child cursor hash table 3,927,427 0.0 0.0 0 0
commit callback allocati 8,739 0.0 0 0
dictionary lookup 7,980 0.0 0 0
dml lock allocation 6,767,990 0.1 0.0 0 0
dummy allocation 1,898,183 0.2 0.1 0 0
enqueue hash chains 27,741,348 0.1 0.1 4 0
enqueues 17,450,161 0.3 0.1 6 0
error message lists 132,828 2.6 0.2 1 0
event group latch 884,066 0.0 0.7 0 0
event range base latch 1 0.0 0 0
file number translation 34 38.2 0.9 0 0
global tx hash mapping 577,859 0.0 0 0
hash table column usage 4,062 0.0 0 8,757,234 0.0
hash table modification 16 0.0 0 2 0.0
i/o slave adaptor 0 0 2 0.0
job workq parent latch 4 100.0 0.3 0 494 8.7
job_queue_processes para 1,950 0.0 0 2 0.0
ksfv messages 0 0 4 0.0
ktm global data 8,219 0.0 0 0
lgwr LWN SCN 2,687,862 0.0 0.0 0 0
library cache 310,882,781 0.9 0.0 34 104,759 4.0
library cache load lock 30,369 0.0 0.3 0 0
library cache pin 153,821,358 0.1 0.0 2 0
library cache pin alloca 126,316,296 0.1 0.0 4 0
list of block allocation 2,730,808 0.3 0.0 0 0
loader state object free 566,036 0.1 0.0 0 0
longop free list parent 197,368 0.0 0 8,390 0.0
message pool operations 14,424 0.0 0.0 0 0
messages 25,931,764 0.1 0.0 1 0
mostly latch-free SCN 40,124,948 0.3 0.0 5 0
Latch Sleep breakdown for DB: P7IN1 Instance: P7IN1 Snaps: 582946 -583036
-> ordered by misses desc
Get Spin &
Latch Name Requests Misses Sleeps Sleeps 1->4
cache buffers chains ############## 74,770,083 1,062,119 73803903/884
159/71439/10
582/0
redo allocation 170,107,983 3,441,055 149,631 3292872/1467
48/1426/9/0
library cache 310,882,781 2,831,747 89,240 2754499/6780
6/7405/2037/
0
shared pool 158,471,190 1,755,922 55,268 1704342/4836
9/2826/385/0
cas latch 538,804,153 1,553,992 6,927 1547125/6808
/58/1/0
row cache objects 161,142,207 1,176,998 27,658 1154070/1952
0/2560/848/0
process queue reference 1,893,917,184 1,119,215 106,454 78758/4351/1
36/0/0
Library Cache Activity for DB: P7IN1 Instance: P7IN1 Snaps: 582946 -583036
->"Pct Misses" should be very low
Get Pct Pin Pct Invali-
Namespace Requests Miss Requests Miss Reloads dations
BODY 3,137,721 0.0 3,137,722 0.0 0 0
CLUSTER 6,741 0.1 4,420 0.2 0 0
INDEX 353,708 0.8 361,065 1.2 0 0
SQL AREA 17,052,073 0.3 54,615,678 0.9 410,682 19,628
TABLE/PROCEDURE 3,521,884 0.2 12,922,737 0.1 619 0
TRIGGER 1,975,977 0.0 1,975,977 0.0 1 0
SGA Memory Summary for DB: P7IN1 Instance: P7IN1 Snaps: 582946 -583036
SGA regions Size in Bytes
Database Buffers 22,330,474,496
Fixed Size 779,288
Redo Buffers 17,051,648
Variable Size 7,180,648,448
sum 29,528,953,880

The best practice for data mart to different BW System.

Hi All,
Would you like to suggest me what i have to do for this case ??
I have 2 SAP BW systems e.g. BW A & BW B.
I wanna transfer data from info cube within BW A into info cube within BW B.
The things that I did :
1. 'Generate Export Data Sources' for info cube BW A.
2. Replicate source system in BW B. In BW B, it will show datasource from info cube BW A.
3. In SAP BW B, I create info package, then I can fetch data from SAP BW A.
What I wanna ask are:
1. Could I make it automatically?? Because everytime I wanna fetch data from Info Cube SAP BW A, I must run info package in SAP BW B / what's the best practice.
2. Could RDA make it automatically ?? Automatic in my case is everytime I have new/update data in Info cube SAP BW A, I don't have to run info package in SAP BW B.
SAP BW B will automatically fetch the data from Info Cube A.
If yes, could you give me step-by-step how to use RDA to solve my case please..
Really need ur guidances all .
Thanks,
Best regards,
Daniel N.

Hi Daniel,
You can create a process chain to load your cube in BW A. SImilarly create a process chain in your BW B system to load its cube.
Now in your system BW A you create a process chain to load your cube. After that you can run automatically the procewss chain in BW B. You can use the Remote chain option for this.
This will trigger a chain automatically in the remote system.
Regards,
Mansi

Help! Does anyone know the best framework for delivering an enterprise-quality Flex-based reporting system?

Background
We need to build a commercial-quality, Flex-based reporting system for the corporate customers who use our English learning system. Ours is a multi-tenant web-based Saas solution.
he solution must include:
> a slick, professional design, including Flex/Flash UI and charting and graphing
> a full suite of serverside functionality such as report management, scheduling, export and delivery
> strong security in a multi-tenant environment
> can be integrated seamlessly with our existing Flex/.NET application
> data sources are MS SQL Server database and/or OLAP cubes
> scalability/performance to serve tens of thousands of users
> no per-user license fees (we need to own this system)
The initial focus is on "canned" reports with some parameter controls, while future releases will include more freeform report designer/builder capabilities.
Do you know of a good example/approach? Please reply here, or to [email protected]
Thanks in advance!

Hello,
The recommended way is with JCA Connector.
Adaptive RFC is included from NW7.1,
See "Creating an Adaptive RFC2 Sample Application without using Web Dynpro"
in the SAP HELP of NWCE7.1 or NWCE7.2.
Seems to be based in JCo 3.0 and Java5 so it will not work in NW70.
For older Versions like EP 5 there is also a JCo ClientService available.
Regards
Johannes

What is the best solution for bad service at home

I need to know if there is any solution for this problem a's in signal boosters and all....

You should contact your Service Provider and tell them your problem that you are facing..
That's the only way because they can solve the problem from their end

Who Has The Best Platform For Buying and Selling Used and New Video Games?

plz suggest..........

I'm not sure if I understand the questiion or not. But gamest$p seems to hold the market on new and used games.
Because of the high cost of gaming and the economy, I never buy new games anymore.
I buy from pawnshops and kraigslist.
**If you like my answer then click the little Star under my username.
**If my response answered your question then click the Solved button. Thanks

OS users for Data Service and Information Platform Service

Hello experts,
We will install SAP Data Server 4.2 Support Package 2 which required Information Platform Service to be installed before.
Can we use the same operating system user boadm for both software installation and maintenance.
Thanks & Best Regards,
Tong Ning

Hello Dirk Venken,
Thanks!
What is the best practice about the uses required for Data Service and IPS? (in one user or two different user.)
Regards,
Tong Ning

Best Course for Data Warehousing

Hi,
I am planning to join data warehousing course .I heard there is lot courses in data warehousing .
Data warehousing with ETL tools or
Data warehousing with Crystal Reports or
Data warehousing with Business object or
Data warehousing with Informatica or
Data warehousing with Bo-Webel or
Data warehousing with Cognos or
Data warehousing with Data Stage or
Data warehousing with MSTR or
Data warehousing with Erwin or
Data warehousing with oracle.
Please suggest me which best to choose and which have more scope because I don't know the ABC of data warehousing but I have some experience in oracle.
Is it must that I need work experience in data warehousing then only can get a job ?Please tell me which is the best book for data warehousing which should start from scratch. Please give your suggestions about to my queries.
Thanks & Regards,
Raji

Hi,
Basically Datawarehouse is a concept.To develop DW , we need two tools mainly. One is ETL tool and other one is Reporting tool .
The few famous ETL tools are
Informatica
Data Stage
Few famous Reporting tools are
Crystal Reports
Cognos
Business object
As a DW developer you should aware of atleat one ETL tool and atleat one Reporting tool.The combination is your choice.It better to finout the best combination in point of job market , and then learn them.
Erwin is Datamodel tool. It can aslo be used in DW implementation. You have already have experience on ORacle,So my adivce is go for Data warehousing with oracle or Data warehousing with Informatica .And learn one reporting tool.I donot is there any reporting tool available from ORACLE.
My suggestion on books.
Fundamentals of Datawarehouse by PaulRaj Ponnai and
Datawarehouse toolkit.
http://www.inmoncif.com/about.html is one of the best site for Datawarehouse.
With rgds,
Anil Kumar Sharma .P
Assigning points is the way to say thanks in SDN site.

Best practices for search service in a sharepont farm

Hi
in a sharepoint web application there is many BI dashboards are deployed and also we have plan to
configure enterprise search for this application.
in our sharepoint 2010 farm we have
2 application server s
2 WFE servers
here one application server is running
c.a + webanalytics service and itself is a domain controller
second application server is for only running secure store service+ Performance point service only
1 - here if we run search server service in second application server can any issues to BI performance and
2 - its best practice to run Performance point service and search service in one server
3 -also is it best practice to run search service in a such a application server where already other services running
and where we have only one share point web application need to be crawled and indexed with below crawl schedule.
here we only run full crawl per week and incremental crawl at midnight daily
adil

Hi adil,
Based on your description, you want to know the best practices for search service in a SharePoint farm.
Different farms have different search topologies, for the best search performance, I recommend that you follow the guidance for small, medium, and large farms.
The article is about the guidance for different farms.
Search service can run with other services in the same server, if condition permits and you want to have better performance for search service and other services including BI performance, you can deploy search service in dedicated server.
If condition permits, I recommend combining a query component with a front-end Web server to avoid putting crawl components and query components on the same serve.
In your SharePoint farm, you can deploy the query components in a WFE server and the crawl components in an application server.
The articles below describe the best practices for enterprise search.
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc850696(v=office.14).aspx
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc560988(v=office.14).aspx
Best regards
Sara Fan
TechNet Community Support

Suggestions about the best tool for quality check for an ADF application

Hi All,
I need a few suggestions about the best tool for quality check in our ADF applicaiton.
ours is a small size WebCenter Portal application which neither uses any task flows nor consumes any portlets.
It has many jspx pages that use ADF components like table etc, consume web services using web service clients, and has some java classes.
We have come across below option to implement the code quality tools.
1. Jdeveloper inbuilt Staus option in View tab
2. PMD extension for Jdeveloper
3. Red Samurai
Few more suggestions or best practices would be really helpful.
Thanks,
Usha

Some general ADF / Webcenter coding standards -
http://umeshagarwal24.blogspot.com/2012/06/adf-coding-standards-check-points.html
You can use JAudit as well as mentioned in the blog.

What's the best solution for audio out of sound files from a MacBook Air to both an amplifier and to a subwoofer amplifier? I'm using the MBA to play sound files for worship services at our church.

I have a MacBook Air (13", 1.7GHz, 8GB RAM, 500GB SSD) that I'll be using to play sound files (primarily organ and piano) for worship services at my church. We'll be using a QSC RMX2450 650 Watts/Channel amplifier with Community CPL-27 speakers and also a JBL SUB 250P powered subwoofer with its own amplifier. What's the best option for getting sound out from the Mac to both of these amplifiers?

if you work with own recorded sounds you might wanna have a music program where you want to work with samples, steinberg has got very good ones (so they say)... but their really really ( ²) expensive(that's why almost no one haves them), magix haves good ones too bu their more for 'unprofessional' use, ableton haves really good ones too and they're not to difficult to use (if you know a bit of those programs you learn very quickly) and if you don't get them, there is a sort of manual built in it which explains and lets you do things to start (basics)
i hope this helped, btw stereo speakers are always better if you buy good ones (no pc speakers), but if you don't think you need them, don't buy them...
so again, i hope you have some ideas now

The best platform for Data Services / Integrator / Quality

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for