The process time between INNER JOIN and join in WHERE clause

as u know, there are 2 kind of join
SELECT *
FROM tableA
INNER JOIN tableB
ON tableA.ID= tableB.ID
WHERE ....
and
SELECT *
FROM tableA, tableA
WHERE tableA.ID = tableB.ID
AND ....
I find the first one is faster in MS SQL Server.
But i test them in oracle and i find that it is the same. Is it correct?

Who knows why SQL Server shows different timings. Perhaps it's just cos it's not good at knowing that the two things are the same.
The only difference in timing as far as Oracle is concerned is the time it takes to parse the syntax of the query, which will be nanoseconds. The execution time of two equivalent queries will not differ based on the factor of the syntax used.

Similar Messages

Hi can I use Time Capsule 4th generation as a back up at the same time between my iMac and HP PC

HI Just bought a 4th generation Time Capsule and after a bit of trouble, I was able to do the following...
1. Connect TC to my modem via ethernet cable
2. Set up my first time Machine from my iMac to Time Capsule
3. Set up my HP PC via ethernet cable to Time Capsule
4. Set up HP Printer Scanner to USB port in Time Capsule, can now print from my PC and iMac using the same printer.
Here is the question...
Can I use Time Capsule (2TB version, not that this should matter, I think) as an external back up for my HP PC, running Windows 7?
I asked this question at Apple Store and they said YES, now I have my doubts as I cannot see Time Capsule as an external drive when I check my PC and computer part there, can see my C drive, D drive (internal backup drive in my PC), E drive (DVD drive) and that is it.
Installed AirPort utility for Windows, have version 5.5 something. I can see TIme Capsule using this at my PC but can I somehow save my HardDrive to Time Capsule, even manually?
Or is the problem that as I started Time Capsule with Time Machine Backup first, it has formatted Time Capsule to support only Apple version, and this is why I cannot see Time Capsule as an external harddrive?
Any help would be appreciated!
I have already an external HD for my Windows PC, just thought this way I could potentially have all the data in one place and also able to use 1 printer...
Many Thanks

Remember Apple Names are not fully SMB compatible..
Reset the TC and do the setup with all SMB naming.. ie.. short, no spaces, pure alphanumeric.
That means TC name eg TC
Wireless name (different for 5ghz) eg TC24ghz and TC5ghz
And hard disk share name.. eg Data
Make sure all passwords also match that convention.. but you can use more characters.. up to 20 or more if you are paranoid. Pure alphanumeric though.
In the file sharing area. set the right workgroup. And it makes life easier turning on the guest account to read and write.
Then in windows explorer simply type
\\TCname or \\TCIPaddress .. obviously you change the names with the actual name or IP.

How to show the processing time taken for a BPEL process in BAM report.

Hi All,
I have the data as below in the Data object. I would like to show the time taken for each order to complete in the report.
instance Id     order Id     product Name     product Code     price     status     instance Time      updaterName
1360010     ord004     Guitar     prod003     2000     requested     9/22/2008 12:12:11 PM     Invoke_InsertSalesOrder
1360010     ord004     Guitar     prod003     2000     Approved     9/22/2008 12:15:11 PM     Invoke_OrderStatusUpdate
This data comes from simple BPEL process where sensors are configured at the start and end of BPEL process. Also have a human task activity in between to create the time difference.
In Enterprise link design studio, I tried to calculate the time difference using expression calculator and store it as calculated field. But that doesn't seems to work because when I execute the plan, second sensor data reaches only after human approval whereas first sensor data would be waiting for calculation and ultimately nothing comes into data object.
How and where the calculation be done to show the processing time in the report. Please someone throw some light on this.
Regards
Jude.
Edited by: user600726 on Sep 30, 2008 1:30 AM

I would suggest modifying your data object so that the data can all be in a single row and use the sensor at the end of the process to upsert (update) the row created by the sensor at the start of the process. The time difference between two fields in the same row is then an easy calculation on a BAM report -- No EL plan should be needed.

When using historical datalogging, is it possible to hide the elapsed time between tag updates when viewing on a graph?

When my process stops, I am reading an array of tags(datapoints) and writing the max and average to memory tags for data logging. However, when viewing the data, the elapsed time between cycles spreads the data out unevenly. It could be 90 seconds between cycles or maybe two hours or longer. Is there a way to convert the time axis data to be just consecutive datapoints?? It would be like logging data based on a particular condition happening rather than time-based trending. Should I try to use the data set logger examples instead?? I would prefer to use the built-in datalogging features rather than writing to databases.

You could export your data to a spreadsheet file and then actually write then again in a second database using this example program in the devzone
http://zone.ni.com/devzone/conceptd.nsf/webmain/5A921A403438390F86256B9700809A53?opendocument
Using this program (if you don't want to modify it, which would take a reasonable amount of time specially if you are not familiar with VI-Based Server) You would have to generate a collum in your spreadsheet file to be the timestamp, it would be a artificial timestamp.
What you could do in your application is to first save the data to file and then read from file, substitute the collum timestamp for the "artificial one" and then write it to the database, again, with that you would not need to modify this program.
However if you have the time and is willing to work with VI-based server you could try to modify the example program to be adapted for your purposes.
I hope it helps
Good Luck
Andre Oliveira
Applications Engineer
National Instruments

What is the exact diff between At New and On Chnage

hello all
what is the exact diff between At New and On Chnage in control breaks statements. and when shall we go for At new & when shall we go for On change on events.
Plz tell with with some code.

Hi ,
Using at new
Each time the value of c changes, the lines of code between at new and endat are executed. This block is also executed during the first loop pass or if any fields to the left of c change. Between at and endat, the numeric fields to the right of c are set to zero. The non-numeric fields are filled with asterisks (*). If there are multiple occurrences of at new, they are all executed. at end of behaves in a similar fashion.
Using the on change of Statement
Another statement you can use to perform control break processing is on change of. It behaves in a manner similar to at new.
The following points apply:
u2022     If the value of any of the variables (v1, v2, and so on) changes from one test to the next, the statements following on change of are executed.
u2022     If no change is detected and else is specified, the statements following else are executed.
on change of differs from at new in the following respects:
u2022     It can be used in any loop construct, not just loop at. For example, it can be used within select and endselect, do and enddo, or while and endwhile, as well as inside get events.
u2022     A single on change of can be triggered by a change within one or more fields named after of and separated by or. These fields can be elementary fields or field strings. If you are within a loop, these fields do not have to belong to the loop.
u2022     When used within a loop, a change in a field to the left of the control level does not trigger a control break.
u2022     When used within a loop, fields to the right still contain their original values; they are not changed to contain zeros or asterisks.
u2022     You can use else between on change of and endon.
u2022     You can use it with loop at it where . . ..
u2022     You can use sum with on change of. It sums all numeric fields except the one(s) named after of.
u2022     Any values changed within on change of remain changed after endon. The contents of the header line are not restored as they are for at and endat.
Regards,
KV

Difference in the MM functionalities between 4.6C and ECC 6.0.

Hi gurus,
What is the difference in the MM functionalities between 4.6C and ECC 6.0.
I already went through several links, which was moslty related with technical aspects.
But I need functionalitywise.
(Note: In ECC 6.0 using MIGO, transfer posting can be done. Apart from that is there any other functionality change)
It will be of great help if u provide....
cheers,
vimal

Hello
Following are the basic differences as far as MM Module is concerned;
Pickup list - Batch where-used list display in transaction MB56
u2022 Until release 4.7, the top-down and bottom-up analyses in the function pickup list for batch where-used list (transaction MB5C) were displayed only in the form of simple output lists. As of release 6.00 of SAP ERP Central Component, the function pickup list for batch where-used list branches to the batch where-used list itself (transaction MB56).
u2022 In addition, user can define how the data in the batch where-used list is displayed, in the initial screen.
u2022 User can use all the settings available in the batch where-used list. For example, he can expand transfer posting or display vendor batch. However, it is not possible to limit the selection to valid plants in the initial screen of the pickup list.
Usability enhancements for transaction MIGO for the posting of goods movements
u2022 For goods movements that refer to purchase orders as reference documents (for example, goods receipt, goods issue, subsequent adjustment), user can specify the ordering plant as an additional selection criterion directly next to the purchase order number and the item number.
u2022 There is a new default value: "copy account assignment fields." When entering other goods receipts, user can copy existing account assignment data from the previous item to use as the default values for a new item. To do this, user has to set the copy account assignment fields indicator in the default values.
u2022 User changes the default values in the menu path "Settings -> Default Values."
u2022 Goods movement is monitored with reference to a material document. When you enter the following goods movements, it is possible to specify a material document, such as the following, as the reference document:
Goods receipt
Goods issue
Transfer posting
Remove from storage
u2022 Note that these material documents must be documents that have arisen from a goods movement without reference ("Others") and that are not reversal documents.
New report : display list of invoice documents (MIR5)
u2022 Logistics invoice verification offers a new report display list of invoice documents (RMMR1MDI), w hich user can use to display such a list (Transaction is MIR5).
u2022 As an addition to the existing program invoice overview (transaction code MIR6), user have extended selection criteria and display options. For example, on the initial screen user can make selections by one-time customers, invoice gross amount, and entry date.
u2022 User can also show an expert mode, which enables him to select at plant level by FI document, GL A/c posting, and Material Posting.
u2022 In the output list, the report shows both posted and held invoices.
u2022 It does not show invoices without a corresponding FI document; such as invoices planned for verification in the background or which the software has already verified as containing errors.
Requirement prioritizations in materials management
u2022 With Requirement Prioritization functionality user can assign requirement urgency at item level in purchasing and reservation documents.
u2022 The software determines the relevant requirement priority (overall priority) of a material requisition from the combination of requirement urgency group and organizational priority.
Mass maintenance of outline agreements
The following two transactions available:
u2022 Mass maintenance for contracts: transaction code MEMASSCONTRACT
u2022 Mass maintenance for scheduling agreements: transaction code MEMASSSA
Commitment plan for purchase contracts
u2022 With the function of the commitment plan for purchase contracts, it is possible to pre plan value consumption for a purchase contract.
u2022 To this end, a commitment plan is generated for each document item of the relevant contract.
u2022 This commitment plan itself can have any number of items.
u2022 User can define a value and a validity date for each commitment plan item.
u2022 This enables user to pre plan different values for different periods of time.
u2022 The software generates an earmarked fund document for a defined commitment plan item.
u2022 This earmarked funds document can in turn contain several different items with different account assignments.
u2022 The software adopts these account assignments from the item account assignments of the commitment plan.
u2022 If a purchase requisition or purchase order references this contract, the earmarked funds document is copied into the purchase order, and the account assignment is adopted from that document.
u2022 Account assignment to a different account assignment object is then no longer allowed.
Availability check in "Enjoy purchase order and requisition"
u2022 Display and checking of availability are invokable separately in the "Enjoy purchase order and requisition" function, in line with the software behavior on the sales side.
u2022 User invoke the display and checking of availability in the "Enjoy purchase order" function (transaction code ME21N) and the "Enjoy purchase requisition" function (transaction code ME51N) as follows:
To display the availability overview, choose the menu path "Environment -> Availability." - To check availability, choose the "Check Availability" icon.
Until this release, if user carried out the availability check for an item of a stock transport order, the software adopted confirmations as per the desired date/time only.
u2022 Two settings are possible with availability check:
Confirmation as per desired date/time (this is the standard setting and corresponds to previous software behavior)
Delivery proposal - Full confirmation
External services: putting service items in the purchase order on hold (changed)
User can put purchase orders with service items on hold if these items do not contain any errors. Purchase orders with service items can also be put on hold if errors occur only at header level or as a result of the availability check.
Customizing transactions OX18 replaced by view
The assigned customizing transactions have been replaced by the following view in the following implementation guide activity in customizing for the enterprise structure: Assign plant to company code: transaction OX18 replaced by view V_T001K_Assign. One will find this activity in the implementation guide under the menu path "Enterprise Structure -> Assignment -> Logistics General -> Assign Plant to Company Code."
Goods receipt: new movement types in inventory management
The following new movement types are available in inventory management:
107: Goods receipt to valuated goods receipt blocked stock
109: Goods receipt from valuated goods receipt blocked stock
Prepayment of invoices
This functionality is characterized as follows:
u2022 User can trigger prepayment of vendor invoices in logistics invoice verification.
u2022 User use the prepayment function for vendors with whom organisation has a good, long-standing relationship.
u2022 The function enables payment soon after issue of the invoice and full exploitation of the date of required payment and existing cash discounts, by posting the vendor liabilities, taxes, and cash discounts in financial accounting in advance.
u2022 The software executes the payment of the invoice regardless of the relevant goods receipt and the outcome of the invoice verification check.
u2022 Most logistics invoice verification standard functions are not affected by the prepayment function.
u2022 When the software posts invoices, it continues to execute the standard checks.
u2022 If the software has already posted the prepayment document, user can make only restricted changes to the header fields of the invoice.
u2022 To ensure adequate and orderly financial accounting postings, a prepayment clearing account has been added to SAP ERP Central Component.
u2022 Upon prepayment, the software debits this account and then settles the account again after executing the check.
Purchasing accounting information to the former SAP Business Information Warehouse
u2022 With the transfer of the purchasing account information to the former SAP Business Information Warehouse component (whose functionality is now part of SAP Net Weaver), it is now possible to maintain Info Cubes, reports, and queries that can determine how and where the costs from purchasing documents have been assigned and controlled.
u2022 As part of the software, a new data source (2LIS_02_ACC) has been created and the purchasing extraction process extended to cover the account information for purchasing orders, schedule agreements, and contracts.
Automatic settlement of planned delivery costs with evaluated receipt settlement (MRDC)
u2022 A new report (RMMR1MDC), available within the logistics invoice verification, can be used to automatically settle planned delivery costs.
u2022 To invoke the report, from the SAP easy access screen, choose the menu path "Logistics -> Materials Management -> Logistics Invoice Verification -> Automatic Settlement -> Automatic Delivery Cost Settlement" (transaction code MRDC).
u2022 Functionality for report RMMR1MRS is enhanced.
u2022 User can use the report RMMR1MRS, "Evaluated receipt settlement with logistics invoice verification (LIV)" (transaction code MRRL), to settle planned delivery costs in addition to goods and service items within logistics invoice verification.
u2022 To do so, set the relevant indicator on the initial screen of the report.
Parking service items
It is now possible to put service orders without errors or with commitment errors on hold.
Report MB5B : Stock on Posting Date
u2022 This Report is available with "Non-Hierarchy" display option which provides details of Opening, Receipt, Issue and Closing balances of Stock with quantity and value both for a given period.
u2022 This functionality is not available in Release 4.7.
Stock Transfer Between Storage Locations
u2022 Function of stock transport orders between storage locations is available from ECC 6.0 onwards.
u2022 As a result of which user can input issuing storage location with supplying plant.
u2022 Facility of using different delivery types for different issuing storage locations is available.
u2022 Shipping Point data can also be determined based on the issuing storage location.
If u want to know more go through the following links
http://solutionbrowser.erp.sap.fmpmedia.com/
http://help.sap.com/saphelperp2005vp/helpdata/en/43/6880cbb88f297ee10000000a422035/frameset.htm_
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERP6/ERP2005+Upgrade
Regards
Gregory Mathews

How to calculate the Processing time for material based on its route ?

Hello experts,
I would like to calculate the Scheduled in-house production time based on route.
Actually this is done in the prod. route in tcode CA02. (via menu Extras => scheduling => schedule).
After getting the schedule table press the 'scheduling results' button I received the Processing time, Setup and teardown time,... Scheduled in-house production time.
So I'm looking for a function or any tool to use it in report.
thanks,
Eli

hi,
from routing screen,extras>scheduling>schedule(give a variant name)>scheduling results>update material master.this writes the info in the temp file.use tcode CA96 to update material master.this updates lot size dependent in house production time in work scheduling view of material master and deletes the lot size independent inhouse prod, time in MRP2 view.this tool gives more accurate results for your inhouse prod. time.
> Hello experts,
> I would like to calculate the Scheduled in-house
> production time based on route.
> Actually this is done in the prod. route in tcode
> CA02. (via menu Extras => scheduling => schedule).
> After getting the schedule table press the
> 'scheduling results' button I received the Processing
> time, Setup and teardown time,... Scheduled in-house
> production time.
> So I'm looking for a function or any tool to use it
> in report.
>
> thanks,
> Eli

How can I sync up the IDOC definitions between PI/XI and R3?

XI/PI gurus,
We just applied SAP enhancement packs 4 to our R3 and some XI patches to our XI/PI and now we did not see the messages in our XI QA box after the IDOC was sent out from R3.
We think one possible cause was the IDOC definition are different between our XI and R3.
How can I sync up the IDOC definitions between PI/XI and R3 and not mess up our existing mappings in XI?
Should I just remove the import objects and reipmort the IDOCS from R3 again?
Thanks in advance!
Fisher Li

Use transaction IDX2. The metadata must be deleted from the cache in IDX2, this can be done by selecting the appropriate system from the list, drilling down the affected IDOC type and chosing delete
The next time an IDOC is sent or received, the cache will be refreshed.

Planned orders are not taking into account the processing time

Hi,
Could you please tell me why planned orders quantities are not based on processing time from the material master.
Materials was set before with 1 day in house production , no matter of lot size.
Based on routings I updated material master with processing time depending on lot size.
What is bottering me now is that planned orders are not taking into account processing time. (e.g. based on my processing time 1000 pce are produced in 3 days, but planned orders show me that 1000 pce are still need in 1 day , but it can not be produced in 1 day ).
what did I miss?
Thanks a lot for any information!

Hello Simona
The in house production time from tab MRP 2 is lot size independent.
However, on tab work scheduling you can define a lot size dependent times.
Please observe that, if you have entered an in house production time, the processing time will not be considered. The F1 help of the field provides the following explanation:
You can define work scheduling times in the material master record in one of two ways:
Either you enter the in-house production time. If required, you can get the system to update this value from the routing.
Or you enter the setup, teardown, processing, and interoperation times. If you maintain these values, the system determines the in-house production time on the basis of lot size.
Therefore, if you want to consider the processing time, you should remove the in house processing time.
BR
Caetano

Process flow between edit ,renderlistitem and show form in XML form builder

Hi all ,
i'm building from in xml from builder . i'm confused with the process between edit ,renderlist item and show froms .can any one please explain me the Process flow between those
thanks,
rajeev.

Hi Rajeev!
There is no process flow between those forms. They are seperate views of the same document, nothing more.
The Edit form is always used if you create or edit a xml document based on the form.
The renderlist item form is used if more than one XML document is shown, for example in a list.
The show form ist used if the document should be displayed in full, eg by clicking on an XML document in a list.
It is even possible to add more custom forms and display them. If you "preview" an XML document, you get the choice to display the document with all display forms available (default Renderlist item and Show). If you watch the URL when previewing a xml document you'll see an URL parameter selecting the form to show.
Regards,
Jürgen

What is Microsoft's official policy regarding the processing time for HCK2.1 Driver Submissions?

What is Microsoft's official policy regarding the processing time for HCK2.1 Driver Submissions?
Can someone point me to a document that states the official policy stating their maximum review time? This info used to be in the WLK1.6 FAQ but I don't see it for the HCK2.1 suite.
Thanks!
Al

Ian,
Thanks for your reply. Yes, I'm sure LabVIEW uses the (default) Windows timer. And yes, 1 mS is not guaranteed due to the preemptive nature of Windows (and even "RTOSs" to varying degrees), which is why I see about plus or minus 2 mS.
Apparently the Windows timer can be set by API calls. See: http://www.lucashale.com/timer-resolution/. Here's a screen shot of his TimerResolution.exe on a Windows 7 PC:
Here it is on my Windows XP PC after I set it to "Maximum" (initially it was 15.625 mS):
Notice that it sets the Maximum to less than 1 mS, which is supposed to be the max, so there are some bugs. Plus the Default button does not reset it in XP, but does work on Windows 7 or 8. (I know this is not the place to "debug" non-LabVIEW applications!)
I'll bet LabVIEW sets it, too. The only caveat, as I said, is it looks like another application can change it, since the hardware timer is a "global" timer. I have not seen this issue in my LabVIEW applications, have you?
I guess I need to do some more digging to see the code to set the timer, but it looks like the developers of LabVIEW have it figured it out.
(FYI, I did notice that running my LabVIEW app (which gives about 2 mS resolution) or a C# app, which gives 15.625 mS resolution, does not affect what TimerResolution.exe reports, so I'm not sure if it's really working correctly. If I figure it out I'll post the results.)
Ed

Downsizing a fat ODS to optimaze the processing time!

Hello all,
Working with SAP NetWeaver BI 7.0, a customizing FI_CO OPC ODS with 300.000.000 records extracted from Sap R/3, was enhanced with 2 new fields and since then it has generated big processing time about 20 hrs and same times basis team needs to kill it! This ODS has been loading a Cube and the new enhanced fields will be loaded to another Cube.
As a newbie and Sap BI also newbie at this project, Ive been requested to analyze the model and give a better option to optimize the loading process, options such as should this ODS be deleted and data be extracted straight to the Cubes, or downsizing this ODS by removing the olds records of it and saving it in other new ODS?
Anyone could come up with a bright idea?
Thanks in advanced

Hi all,
Thanks for all replies (Alex & Jorge)
But I've just learned today, the problem above is not exactly what is going on! In reality the problem is not about processing overtime while loading the COPS ODS, but after the 2 new attributes were added to the structure COPS ODS the "Transport" of it is taking big overtime, caused by the needy of BW to re-index the ODS since the 300.0000.000 records are already there! As I said before, I need to redesign the model and suggest some good options to solve the problem. Some options could be deleting data from ODS and keeping the InfoCubes; or deleting data prior to current fiscal year from COPS ODS and keeping historical InfoCubes; or updating everything then perform logical partitioning then keep details in the ODS and aggregate data in Infocubes, also could be moving all COPS ODS data to a temp, apply OPC changes to it and then move data back!
I need to show the advantage or disadvantage of my options and must choose the better solution!
Please, any good suggestion?
Many thanks in advance
Bia

Can anyone explain the main differences between CRM 2007 and CRM 7?.

Can anyone explain the main differences between CRM 2007 and CRM 7?.
Does CRM 2007 use the WebUI?.
Jason

My fault for not putting my question forward correctly.
I have worked with CRM 7 a few times now, but my experience has jumped me from CRM 5 straight to CRM 7, having never touched CRM 2007.
I now have an opening to work on CRM 2007 so I was intrigued to know what it physically looked like. I assume it does not use the WebUI interface?.
Jas

Why the processing time for loading is taking longtime

Hi All,
why the processing time for loading is taking longtime i want to know the soltion.
Thanks,
chandu

To analyze the process chain and fix it, go through the below document:
[SAP BW Data Load Performance Analysis and Tuning|https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/3a699d90-0201-0010-bc99-d5c0e3a2c87b]
Hope it helps,
Naveen

Consumption during the processing time of the production order

Which adjustments must be made in the material master for the calculation of the lot size in the MRP run, that the consumption of the material during the processing time of the production order is considered for the calculation of the lot size.

Hi ,
You have to judiciously indicate the re order point in the material master( the re-order point is the sum of saftey stock and consumption during replenishment lead time).
How ever , this does not in any way influence the lot size , but only influence the no of lots i.e the procurement proposals. The lot size is determined by the lot sizing procedure selected by you , depending on various factors like agrrements with your vendor , optimum lot sizes to reduce the cost of procurment and storages etc.
You can refer to the following url for details on lot size :http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/fe/819b9f643b11d3b4e40004ac160649/frameset.htm
and for details about re order point :
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/db/6f143ea7ec11d3a8330000e82a3c24/frameset.htm
Hope this information will be useful.
Regards
Raghuramam.

The process time between INNER JOIN and join in WHERE clause

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for