Thirdparty and Cross-Company Returns

HI,
Anybody give process of Third party Retruns.and Cross-Company Returns.
Thanks & Regards,
Raja.k
[email protected]

hi
3rd Party Returns
Customer/Merchandise Category
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/c1/376328449a11d188fe0000e8322f96/frameset.htm
Create A 3rd party payer
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/7d/102f4069702d22e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
Cross-Company
Returns
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/2d/5d10debfc311d4b579006094b9b9dd/frameset.htm
Cross-Company Code
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/d1/ddde87bedf11d4b579006094b9b9dd/frameset.htm
Palnt Return & Store return with stock transport
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/43/5ebf76388a5f86e10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm
Correction Process in Cross System transit
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_02/helpdata/en/44/4e6bb1cfa94872a6c4c1836b638ecd/frameset.htm
Reward if USeful
Thanx & Regards.
Naren..

Similar Messages

  • Error in post goods receipt of delivery for a cross company return STO

    Hi
    I created a cross company return STO in ME21N (with returnd indicator). Vendor V001 (DC) and Site F001.
    I created a delivery in VL10B. Delivery Type NCR.
    I did a Goods Receipt for STO. Movement Type 161. Internally stock in issued from site F001.
    I am trying to do a Post Goods Receipt of the Delivery in VL02N and I am getting this error.
    Delivery quantity is greater than supplying site stock quantity
    Message no. VL900
    Supplying site is F001 which has enough stock.
    DC has no stock and I amtrying to return stock to DC from store.
    How to eradicate this issue?
    Thanks and Regards

    Hi
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/B1/SAPBusinessOne...ToGo-3.TheBasicsofFinancial+Accounting
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sbo88/helpdata/en/45/06b9997d720487e10000000a155369/content.htm
    kiran

  • Questions on Inter-company and Cross-company sales ordering process..

    Hi,
    I understood the delivery plant and the sales org. is not in the same company code might be the process, but i want to know some details especially in SAP system how it is realized and processed, hope could kindly help me on below questions!! thanks!!
    1)what is the difference between inter-company sales and Cross-company sales??
    2)What is the general document flow and config. when in below 2 cases:
    Suppose the 2 company code under same sap client system, then what kinds of company code,plant config within the system for inter-compan and cross-company, and finally what kind of document flow will it be in the system.
    Suppose the 2 company code is under diff sap system, then what kind of doc flow in each sap system for inter-company and cross-company sales process???
    Thank you very much!!!!

    Hi,
    Basically there are totally Three types of scenarios
    1. Intra Compnay Stock Transport Order
    In this type of scenario, the stock is transfered between Two Plants which are under the same Compnay Code. The document type used here is UB. Here in this scenario the owner ship on the stock is not changed thats way there will not be any Invoice. The process as follows
    a. Create Purchase Order with document type UB - ME21N
    b. Create Replenishment Delivery with Document type NL - VL10B
    c. Picking and PGI - VL02N
    Now stock will be shown in Transit, you can check this using T.Code MB5T.
    d. Do MIGO to receive the stock into ordering plant.
    2. Inter Compnay Stock Transport Order
    This is called as Cross Compnay STO. Here the stock is sent from one plant to another plant which are in two different Compnay codes. That means the Ownership on the stock is changed in this scenario, that way there will be Intercompnay Invoice IV is reaised. Here the stock is just moved to one plant to another plant but not to any customer.
    The Process is as follows
    a. Create a PO using type NB - ME21N
    b. Create a Cross Compnay Replenishment delivery using type NLCC - VL10B
    c. Picking and PGI in VL02N
    d. Inter Compnay Invoice IV is raised by Supplying Compnay code to the Ordering Compnay Code - VF01
        for this a customer created in Supplying Compnay who represents the Ordering Compnay and the invoice is raised against to that customer.
    e. MIGO to receive the stock in Ordering Plant
    f. MIRO to do invoice verification and do Vendor account update. This also can be done by EDI triggering, to update the Vendor Account. That means with this step, ordering compnay will update into its vendor account that he has to give certain amount to the compnay who supplied the stock.
    3. Inter Compnay Customer Sales
    This is similer to the 2 process, but here instead of sending to Plant we will send the stock directly to Customer of other compnay code.
    The process is as follows
    a. Customer raises  normal sales order in another compnay code of type OR - VA01
    b. But if the plant of that compnay does not have stock, then in the order the plant is changed to other compnay code plant.
    c. Delivery is created in supplying Compnay against this Order - VL01
    d. Picking and PGI is done - VL02N
    e. But the stock is sent direclty to customer from supplying plant.
    f. Ordering compnay will raise normal invoice F2 to the customer
    g. Supplying Compnay will raise Intercompnay invoice IV to the Ordering Compnay.
    But for all these process there are some configurations can be done, like
    the material should be extended to both the plants
    a customer is created in supplying plant who represents the ordering plant so that IV can be generated to that customer.
    Supplying Plants should be linked to ordering Sales Org and Distribution channel. etc.
    Hope this is clear.
    Thanks
    Praveen

  • Foreign currency settings and cross company code settings

    Hi
         Any one can send me the configuration documents on foreign currency settings and cross company code postings.
    Regards
    Shilpa.

    Foreign currency settings - OBBS: Define translation ratios
                                            OB08 - Maintain exchange rates
    You can read the relevant IMG help for this.
    Cross company code: OBYA - read the IMG help for this also.
    Regards,

  • Shipment and cross company...

    Hi all,
    is it possible to use cross-company function while settling a shipment cost?
    ex:
    companyA is using transportation functions. while creating shipment, it uses companyB as forwarding agent. Both companyA and companyB are in the same client. when companyA settles shipment cost, a purchasing order is being created automatically for companyA. At this point, is it possible to trigger cross-company processes between companyA and companyB?

    Hi Sumit,
    If the Copy control is not maintained for the DeliveryText material Item cat. & I/C Billing Document, then I/C billing will not create.
    Hope this clarify.
    Regards
    Sunil

  • Managing Federal Excise Tax Intra- and Cross-Company Transfers

    We have a business process we need some help on from the financial folks.
    Our client manufactures a controlled product that requires Federal Excise Tax to be applied only when the product leaves the bonded warehouse. We are valuing this material at the material and labor costs, plus a state tax if needed, prior to the product shipping. Once the product ships to our distribution centers, some of which are in the same company code and others of which are in a separate company code.
    The problem we are having is during the transfer process, we need to apply the federal excise tax at the point (e.g., at the post goods issue) where it leaves the bonded warehouse. It needs to be assessed to some kind of account and transfer the costs to the receiving distribution center, where the value of the material is supposed to include the FET as part of the price.
    The clincher is, the entire organization is using moving average price, so it really does have an impact as to how we manage this tax.
    The additional problem is that there are limited opportunities where the distribution centers will need to return this material, but the bonded warehouse cannot absorb the FET in their moving average price.
    If anyone has seen a scenario like this or has any ideas on how to handle, we would much appreciate.
    The process of otherwise transferring the materials (using an NB or a UB purchasing document) works just fine - it is only the application of the tax that appears to be the problem.

    We are on ECC 5.0.   I looked at this menu path: Under Spro--MM-PUR-Pur Order-Set up Stock transport order----, but then I don't have any option that says: STO Storage loc to loc.  All I have is the following:
    - Define Shipping Data for Plants
    - Create Checking Rule
    - Define Checking Rule
    - Assign Delivery Type and Checking Rule
    - Assign Document Type, One-Step Procedure, Underdelivery Tolerance
    Under the last option, Assign Document Type, One-Step Procedure, Underdelivery Tolerance, it seems I can make an entry connecting supplying plant to receiving plant and STO doc type, and so I did that.  But the entry here seems to have made no difference, and no mention anywhere about sloc.  I still get the same error.
    Am I overlooking something?
    Thanks,
    Anke

  • Cross Company Return With Delivery

    Hi friends,
    I am trying to setup a return process with delivery between two companies using two-step procedure.
    Currently Company A purchases products from Company B with a PO document copied from standart PO document NB.
    When saving the PO a delivery is created automatically. (we use automatic delivery creation but it is optional indeed)
    Supplying plant, here the company A, makes goods issue using VL02N.
    Receiving plant, here the company B, then makes the goods receipt against outbound delivery using MIGO.
    The delivery type used here is copied from the standart delivery type NLCC and the delivery item is copied from standart delivery item NLC. This is the forward process.
    The movement types here are 643 (GI from supplying plant), 101 (GR to the receiving plant)
    In fact I made the return process with a one-step procedure.
    I assigned a return delivery type, copied from standart delivery type NRC, to the PO document in customizing returns to vendor.
    And then I made the automatic delivery creation customizing for the PO document within related shipping point.
    After customizing steps completed I tested the process.
    When I save the PO, the delivery is created automatically with type NRC.
    In transaction VL02N, I see the "Save Goods Receipt" button because this is one-step.
    The goods receipt and and goods issues takes place at the same time in the same document  when I push that button.
    The movement types are 675 (GR to the supplying plant, A), 161 (GI from receiving plant, B)
    Here my question is to realize this return process with two step.
    What steps should I follow to make this change? What can be missing?
    Is it obligatory to check the "return item indicator" in return PO?
    Related threads are helpful but I didn't understand which movement types should be used in two step procedure and how and where can I determine that?
    Below link says the two step procedure should be done with 673 but
    http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPSCM/Returnwithdeliveries
    How can I set this up?
    Thanks in advance,
    Yusuf Gezer

    Hi again friends,
    I found the answer to that question.
    The customizing that below path shows how the movement types are determined during VL02N.
    IMG -> Sales and Distribution -> Sales  -> Sales Document -> Schedule Lines -> Define Schedule Line Categories.
    In my question, existing movement type has been set  as 675 for "Movement Type 1-Step" field in related schedule line category, which is assigned to delivery item used.
    (Delivery item is also assigned to delivery type)
    In same customizing, also there is a field named "Movement Type" just upside of the previously mentioned field. It has been also set as 675.
    Changing this "Movement Type" field, I mean upper one, to 673, the process becomes two step.
    That's it, everything works fine.
    However, this change may affect many processes using the same schedule line category.
    That means, if you copy the existing delivery schedule lin category, you'll need a new delivery item, and a new delivery type to use, for your system not to be affected.
    Thank you.
    Edited by: Yusuf Gezer on Oct 25, 2010 9:53 AM
    Edited by: Yusuf Gezer on Oct 25, 2010 9:53 AM

  • RA15 and cross company code processing

    We are using RA method 15 and have some projects that have account assignment WBS elements from other company codes than the billing WBS element. RA ignores figures from WBS elements with different company codes, hence recording COS in the company code of the account assignment WBS and Revenue (via RA) in the billing WBS element. Instead we would like have all revenue and COS calculated in RA on the billing element based on the incurred costs regardless of the company code in the account assignment WBS element. SAP OSS is suggesting that note 819760 may accomplish this. Does anyone have experience with this note.
    We do not want to settle WBS elements within the hierarchy or create multiple billing elements.

    Alex
    Thanks for the update.
    Regards
    Virendra

  • GL account determination for  vendor invoice in cross company sale sales

    Hi
    we are planning to implement cross company sales scenario.
    High level design-
    1) Sales Order is in co code X and the delivery is from group company  lets say  co code Y
    2) The delivery from co code Y generates two invoices- one in Sales area of co code X for the final customer and 2nd in sales area of co code Y for the inter company
    3) The intercompany invoice has EDI output type (Sap standard delivered object is RD04).  The output generates a IDOC which has ability to post automatic vendor invoice in co code X crediting the inter company vendor Y.
    4) The automatic vendor invoice GL account determination is via customisation OBCB and OBCE
    I have some questions around this , particularly if in the vendor invoice we have to account for material and returnable packaging
    In my current project there would FG packed in returnable packaging in co code Y
    For Export there would be a dedicated co code(X).
    Co code X gets orders from customers; and creates sales orders in its sales area with delivery plant of co code Y.
    Along with FG  returnable packaging is also charged as deposit  by - co code X to customer and Co code Y to Co code X.
    so in the vendor invoice how to generate the following entry
    Inter company vendor              150 Cr
    Cost of Goods sold         100 Dr
    Returnable Packages deposit    50 Dr.
    Similarly when the end  customer returns the packaging generate the following entry via the cross company return order and intercompany invoice
    intercompany vendor 50 Dr
    Returnable packages 50 Cr
    if you have worked on this kind of scenario and share how to customise  to post for FG and Returnable packaging separately in the automatic vendor invoice it would be great.
    Edited by: pravin_shah1403 on Nov 25, 2011 3:00 PM

    Hi Pravin.
    Did you figure this out?
    I'm seeing that via OBCB we can hit only one G/L account.
    We also need to hit multiple accounts.
    We've figured out how to hit this via user-exit, however I'm hoping that I've missed something in configuration and that a resolution via configuration is possible?
    Any ideas?

  • CO-PA issue in Thirds Party Sales & Cross Company Code Sales

    Hi,
    In Third Party Sales with Shipping Notification and Cross Company Sales the CO-PA report is not reflecting the correct material cost.  CO-PA is updating the material cost directly from the Material Master. Cross Company sales condition type PI02 & IV02 is using for pricing. IV02 is working perfect, but PI02 is not !
    In detail, for Third Party Sales with Shipping Notification, no material is available in the stock. In material master the material cost display as $ 10/EA. But the Purchase Order value is $ 15/EA. During Goods Receipt time system is taking the cost as $ 15. While Billing time to the customer, system is posting to the CO-PA the material cost as $10/EA. FI postings are perfect, but CO-PA posting is not correct. CO-PA and P&L reconciliation is not matching due to this issue !
    Waiting for the help.
    Best regards,
    Joby

    Have you considered using this user-exit?
    User Exits in the SAPFV45PF0E and SAPFV45PF0C Programs
    EXIT_SAPFV45P_001
    You can use this user exit to decide whether intercompany billing data is used in the profitability segment for cross-company code sales, or whether the data comes from external billing (external customer, sales data from the selling company code.
    Thanks,
    Ben

  • Wrong Posting in CO-PA for 3rd Party Sales & Cross Company Code Sales

    Hi,
    In Third Party Sales with Shipping Notification and Cross Company Sales the CO-PA report is not reflecting the correct material cost.  CO-PA is updating the material cost directly from the Material Master. Cross Company sales condition type PI02 & IV02 is using for pricing. IV02 is working perfect, but PI02 is not !
    In detail, for Third Party Sales with Shipping Notification, no material is available in the stock. In material master the material cost display as $ 10/EA. But the Purchase Order value is $ 15/EA. During Goods Receipt time system is taking the cost as $ 15. While Billing time to the customer, system is posting to the CO-PA the material cost as $10/EA. FI postings are perfect, but CO-PA posting is not correct. CO-PA and P&L reconciliation is not matching due to this issue !
    Waiting for the help.
    Best regards,
    Joby

    In user exit include ZXKKEU03 you should make the COPA COGS equal to the VPRS. Also you can't do a revaluation in COPA for the third party billing types.
    pls assign points to say thanks.

  • Cross company code downpayment posting error

    Hi,
    When I am posting cross company code downpayment in F-48 getting below error.
    "Balancing field "Profit Center" in line item 001 not filled".
    Vendor A/c (Company A)
    Bank clearing A/c(Company B) - Profit center 25000
    Problem it is not deriving the profit center for Vendor reconciliation A/c. I have used document type KZ, check boxes "intercompany postings" and "trading partner" are activated in this document type.
    Default profit center has made for Bank clearing A/c and Cross company code clearing A/c. Assigned Profit center 25000 for Company A also.
    Kindly advice where I am wrong, which is the correct document type to post the Cross company code transactions (Down payment:F-48, charging-off GL open item to Vendor) to derive the profit center for Vendor reconciliation A/c? Or
    How can I configure in New GL that the profit center should get derived from the Cross company code clearing A/c for above cross company code transactions?
    Best regards
    Shanid

    Hi Atif,
    Thanks again for your reply.
    Since we have made Profit center as mandatory in New GL charactristcs this will give the priority to enter the Profit center as
    Mandatory. As I mentioned earlier we required profit center in all lines.
    I have tried whatever you have said, still it is not working.
    It will be great if you give a solution for this.
    Regards
    Shanu

  • Cross company unique material codes

    Hi all,
    Three years ago we implemented SAP R/3 for our five companies which belong to same group of companies. Therefore these company codes are on the same client. Recently we have implemented a new company code on the same client which is responsible for export  activities. This new company code buys goods from other company codes of the group and sells goods to export customers. We have been told by SAP consultants that we can use intercompany and cross company functions to operate these processes. The problem is, we have not planned these functions before, therefore the material codes are different in every company code. We have been told that material codes must be unique in every company code to process intercompany and cross company. Since we have five different company codes and thousands of materials, it is a huge work load for us to create these materials uniquely and delete older materials. What we would like to know is, is there any other way or method to operate cross company and intercompany processes even if the material codes are not unique?
    Best regards

    Hi Mertan,
    I dont think that is possible, for inter company or cross company the material should be unique but if you still want to do with different material name then I think you have to go for development. Discuss this issue with your technical consultant and ask him whether he is able to create a table in which one material is assigned with different name  and assigned it with one unique name. So when you will do the intercompany then system will check that table and identify the material.
    Hope it helps,
    Regards,
    MT
    Edited by: M T on Apr 22, 2010 1:49 PM

  • Final Delivery Box - Cross Company PO

    Good Afternoon !
    Gentlemen,
    I have been facing an issue and will much appreciate any help with that. I am pretty sure many of you have been through this before.
    We are making a PO (Cross Company), but,  after  I make a  good receipt and  receive all  the material (full)  listed in the PO  the u201CFinal deliveryu201D box does not update. It is still unchecked.
    I cannot manually check that box due the default SAP error (message error #06848), as well as it happens to does not update the documents workflow (message error #M7352)
    Also it is affecting the MRP ... so it is becoming critical.
    Would have any idea to how to proceed to fix it up?
    We have already applied the SAP Note 160525 without success.
    We are with:
    SAP Version -  SAP ECC 6.0
    SAP_APPL   604  005  SAPKH60405 
    I hope I made myself clear and thank you all in advance.
    Best Regards
    Everton Esquia

    Dear Everton,
    Please review the attached note which is self-explanatory the behaviour
    of delivery completed indicator with respect to STOs
    1093582  FAQ: Delivery complete indicator ELIKZ
    5.  Question
    In which cases does the system automatically set ELIKZ in stock
    transport orders?
    Answer
    ELIKZ will be set at the goods receipt stage automatically, if the GI =
    GR quantity. This behaviour applies to intra-company stock transport
    orders and cross-company stock transport orders. See note 196280.
    With stock transport orders the 'delivery completed' indicator is only
    relevant when there is no stock in transit The tolerance quantities from
    the purchase order are not taken into account.(see note 34737).
    It is possible to modify the standard to allow to set the "delivery
    completed" indicator for cross-company stock transport orders. This
    modification is contained in note 167795.
    Please also take into account the following attached related notes
    196280     Tolran. and finl deliv. indic. fr stck transp. ord.
    167795     Completion of stock transfers with GI qty > GR qty
    34737      'Delivery completed' doesn't close transport order
    Although the note 34737 says for lower releases, the information is
    valid for your release too.
    Cheers !
    Plauto
    Edited by: Plauto Abreu on Feb 11, 2011 12:18 AM

  • Cross company transactions customization Help - Urgent...

    Hi All,
    Can anyone tell me where I have to do the customization for cross company transactions,
    In the scenarios
    1. for materials shipped to the customer of company code BBBB, by company code AAAA on behalf of company code BBBB or vice versa
    2. For materials shipped to plant of company code BBBB from the plant of company code AAAA or vice versa.
    I would appreciate it, if you can help with customization and configuration steps involved in cross company transactions.
    Thanks in advance
    Kumar

    Hi Kumar,
    With OBYA settings, you will be able to affect cross company code transactions through FI.
    Ex. Maintenance Exp of co. code AAAA are paid by co. code BBBB. Now the affect will be as follows:
    Books of AAAA:
    Maintenance Exp A/c Dr and Cross Company code Clearing (say 'BBBB') A/c Cr
    Books of BBBB:
    Cross Company code Clearing (say 'AAAA') A/c Dr and Bank A/c Cr
    The above affect will take place in books of both the company codes, when u post the document in any one set of books by mentioning the other company code as 'new company code'.
    Hope this helps..

Maybe you are looking for

  • G5 powermac tower unable to boot

    Tried to boot up this morning. the screen froze with apple logo showing but no other movement, then after about 3 mins fans start to make noise. Tried to reset PRAM but to no avail. I then connected G5 to my G3 laptop via firewire in target mode and

  • Is the anyway to get a report of component usage within an Application.

    It would sure be 'nice' to have a report of the component usage within an Application. I am most interested in where the LOVs are being referenced. It is extremely time consuming to check every report/form item by item. I'm sure this information is a

  • Imac vs mac mini signal strength

    I have an intel 20 imac side by side with a mac mini and an airport extreme maybe 20 feet away (with some concrete walls in between. The reception on the macmini is always almost double with respect to the imac (in average 50% vs 28% signal with 8% n

  • Erro 2

    Não consigo sair do modo "restaurar" depois da atualização do Itunes 7.0

  • Error message: No documentation exists for message V1096.

    Hi Friends, While monitoring the production system, got some cancelled transactions. Error message: No documentation exists for message V1096. For this I found one sap note 845599, but it's upto 5.0 , but we are using 6.0. please suggest me how to se