Thre is no response from WAE´s console

Hi,
I  received 3 new appliances (02 WAVE274 and 01 WAVE574). All these  equipments have the same problem: There is no response from console  port.
I  have a console cable that works fine in the console port of our router,  but when I put this console cable in the right serial port of the WAE,  there is no response from console (9600,8,N,1).
When I put a monitor in the video port I see the screen from a normal boot process (see the attached file).
There is no a configuration in these appliances. So, the telnet and web access is not enabled.
Could you please help me?
Thanks,
Teddy

Hi Teddy,
If you see somehting coming out of VGA port on directly connected display, which means the unit is booting up. If you connect the console, you should see the same bootup process. if you see the bootup process from VGA but not thru console, I  suspect, it might be something with console cable or console settings.
Few options you may want to try:
1. Try using one of the cable that was shipped with WAVE device.
2. Try using differnet software. We use PUTTY on regular basis and it works fine with default settings.
3. Try changing console port settings to 9600 N 8 1 XON/XOFF
Hope this helps.
Regards.

Similar Messages

  • How do you get a RESPONSE from Verizon?

    How does one get a response from Verizon?  Here's my situation...
    Given the amount of trouble that I have had with a recent order, you would think that I was trying to land a 747 jet on my roof.  In reality, all I was aiming to do was to cancel the $19.99 per month phone service that I never used.  I do not even own a phone, for that matter.  I also had enhanced high speed Internet, and I wanted to retain the high speed Internet.  A few days before January 13, 2012, I called Verizon and spoke to the 1st sales representative, who ensured me that it was no problem to cancel the phone service and yet retain the high speed Internet for the same monthly price.  24 hours later, my high speed DSL service was no longer functioning.  I will try to briefly explain the disastrous customer service that ensued. 
    The first several phone calls to Verizon were not productive as I was transferred to the wrong department, and then at least one of my phone calls was dropped by the Verizon server.  The representative did not call me back.  I finally got in touch with a technical support representative, the 2nd Verizon representative, who informed me that the high speed Internet had been turned off and that I had to speak to a sales representative to solve the issue.  Another sales representative, the 3rd Verizon representative, informed me that the 1st representative had cancelled my phone line, and thus cancelled all of my services.  Great.  The 3rd representative informed me that he was absolutely capable of handling the problem and that he would simply add a new order for high speed Internet, which was to be activated the next morning.  The next morning came and went, and guess what?  No Internet.  I called again.  The 4th Verizon representative told me that everything that had been done previously was incorrect and that the sales department is not capable of making such changes.  She told me that she could not help me and that my claim had to be submitted to a different department, which has the authority to un-do all of the previous changes.  She told me that I would receive a call back the same day to resolve the issue.  Given my previous experiences with Verizon, I was confident that I would not, in fact, receive a call back and so I asked her how I could get transferred to this department, if I needed to call again.  She said that I could not be transferred.  Okay.  So then I asked her what to ask for so that next time I called, I could be transferred to the correct department without dealing with yet another sales representative who gives me yet a different story.  She informed me that she could not provide that information to customers.  The Department That Shall Not Be Named (and that I cannot contact) did not call me, and I was not surprised.  Unfortunately, I did not know how to go about contacting them, because, as I was told, customers aren’t allowed to do that. 
    The 6th phone call to Verizon was dropped by the Verizon server.  The 7th phone call to Verizon went to the 5th Verizon representative, a sales associate who placed us on hold for the first 15 minutes only to inform us that she could not find any record of our Internet service.  What the heck was she doing, checking her Facebook account?  She finally returns, puts us on another extended hold, and then adamantly tells us that we need to speak with technical support, which, if you recall, was the first Verizon party that I spoke at the beginning of this debacle.  The 5th  representative transfers me again to technical support.  Of course, the technical support personnel, the 6th Verizon representative said what the first one did, that the account was inactive and that we needed to talk to the sales department.  My husband was on the phone at this point because I was DONE.  When the 6th technical support representative tried to transfer him back to the sales department, my husband insisted that the 6th technical support representative remain on the line while we spoke to yet another sales representative, the 7th Verizon representative.  The 6th technical support representative patiently waited with us while we sat in yet another long queue to speak with a member of the sales department. 
    The 7th sale representative, from the retention department based out of New Jersey, found that all previous orders had been set up erroneously.  She cancelled the old orders and reinstated a completely new order.  The DSL began working a few days later.  MAGIC.  She then left me a voicemail message saying that she would eliminate the activation and shipping fee (duh) as I never canceled the account to begin with and as I already had the equipment.  She also applied a coupon to reduce the price to around $30 per month, assured for the next 2 years.  I was relieved. 
    You can imagine our frustration then when we received the bill for $79 on February 6, 2012, which included a much higher monthly rate (around $45) and the shipping and activation fee of $19.99 that we were assured we would not pay. Again, nothing was shipped to us because we already had the equipment.
    Our next phone call to Verizon landed us with a guy, the 8th Verizon representative, who had no intention of helping us.  According to him, there was no record of these wrongs, and despite the fact that we had an old account number and three order numbers that were screwed up, he did not deem that there was enough evidence to change our monthly bill.  (Unfortunately, the 7th Verizon representative did not make notes or appropriately document the situation on the new account.)  The 8th Verizon representative then had the audacity to comment that we could be lying to him, yet he was unwilling to view the evidence that we could have presented.  Instead, he suggested that we call tech support again and try to go through the same process to get connected to the mysterious “retention department” which he knew nothing about. 
    At this point, I was beyond fed up.  The attitude of the 8th Verizon representative put me over the edge.  I filed a complaint with the Better Business Bureau (BBB) with an abbreviated version of this story.  I did not file the complaint to get back at Verizon.  Instead, I filed the complaint because I knew that another phone call to Verizon would be useless.  I’ve been dealing with this issue for over a month, and I’m sick of it.  I have better things to do with my time, believe it or not, and this situation has resulted in a significantly waste of my time over what, in my opinion, was a very simple issue to resolve. 
    The BBB processed the complaint and I was contacted last Friday afternoon by a Verizon representative (the 9th) who said that she was looking into the matter and that she would respond to me within two to three business days.  Well, it’s almost the end of the week, and I have received no response.  Again, after all of this, how could I be surprised? 
    I have been a Verizon customer, wireless and residential, for as long as I can remember, but I am reaching the point of outrage.  This situation is truly unacceptable. 
    You would think that, in 2012, with all of the technology available to us and the fact that Verizon is a COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, that at least Verizon employees would be able to make a basic change to an existing order and that at least one out of 9 Verizon representatives would be able to solve this issue in a span of over four weeks.  Think again. 
    How does one get a response from Verizon? 

    dougiedc wrote:
    It boggles the mind.  The Verizon store on L Street downtown Washington, D.C. cannot access my Verizon account.  They can only sell cellphones then it's up to me to contact Verizon on my own to get the hook up. I even asked "Are you Verizon employes?  Is this a vendor store or is it really a Verizon owned and operated store?"  The answer "Yes, we are Verizon employes, yes this is a Verizon owned and operated store" ...
    Yes, it indeed boggles the mind.  I'm of course referring to the fact that your post concerns Verizon Wireless products and services.  This forum is dedicated exclusively to Verizon Communications services.   As you probably know, Verizon Wireless and Verizon Communications operate as separate companies.
    If you need help for a Verizon wireless product or service, it's best to direct questions to the Verizon Wireless forums.  You can reach them by clicking on "Wireless" (either here or at the top of the page).
    Good luck and I sincerely hope you get your issue resolved.

  • Client email issues - Logged tickets complete lack of response from BC

    I am creating this post on behalf of a client(challenge insurance) in the hope that someone at Business Catalyst might see it and respond as there seems to be know other way of contacting anyone at the company and they seem to respond to any tickets logged at slower than snail pace.
    On Friday my client tried to move his email service to office365, he ran into the issue of not being able to add txt or srv record properly using the bc interface. so we contacted support by logging a ticket. While it was a Friday we expected we might hear some reply over the weekend to the ticket but have yet to receive any instruction or reply from bc on this ticket at 4pm GMT on Monday thats almost 72 hours later. Given my client needed his email fully functioning on the first Monday back after the new year and with a number of new staff members starting we reverted back to use bc for email whist waiting on a response for bc support.
    After reverting back the email worked fine but now my client is receiving an error when trying to send email's from the system
    "SMTP Error: [451] 4.7.1 <END-OF-MESSAGE>: End-of-data rejected: user has temporarily exceeded the allowed mail recipient relays per day. Please try again later."
    I have googled this issue and seen other posts on here so am expecting the following response from the ever helpful bc staff "The daily limit allowed through our SMTP is 500 emails a day and this can't be increased. "
    My client informs he has not sent 500 emails so maybe they will be able to check it but who knows!
    The complete inability to contact bc support adequately and their tardy response times is an absolute disgrace. While my client is only a small business owner he pays a monthly subscription to use bc's system and should expect a standard level support especially when it comes to such a critical part of any business their email communications. If bc are going to provide the service of hosting mail they should at very least be able to respond to a ticket within three days regardless of the day a ticket is logged with some basic assistance or advise. Even the worst hosting companies I have ever had to deal with have had better response times and support some even had email address or contact number you could get them on.
    So if there is anyone out there at bc who can help please get in touch

    When you create a new email it has a limit to stop them being used and created for spam. 500 emails in one go is rather a lot for just an email (I hope he is not using it for newsletters as there is the BC feature for that job).
    This limit increases over time and you will be blocked on that day when you exceed that limit.
    In terms of your complain about response times - You sent a ticket just on a weekend and expecting a reply over the weekend (reading that should be enough to give you an indication on a response) but further to that it is wrapping up the holidays.
    Support availabily during the winter holidays
    While there will be full coverage now I would imagine there is a back log. I have an issue with my TV - I did a support ticket to Samsung on Friday - I have no reply to that ticket yet either and I expected as such.
    If you really need to speak to BC support you can use the live chat - BC Status (on the right)
    I hear you on the time response but please keep in mind what I said about weekend and holiday period.

  • How to get response from an asynchronous BPEL process in Java

    I'm experimenting with BPEL and doesn't seem to be able to get response from an asynchronous BPEL process. Here's the deal:
    I have a BPEL process that takes a string as input, and gives another string as output. This is a asyncronous process.
    I want to initiate this BPEL process as a web service so I generate a Webservice Proxy in JDeveloper 10g (10.1.3.0.4). The function to call the process is now called "initiate" and takes three arguments: the input string, a "org.xmlsoap.schemas.ws._2003._03.addressing.EndpointReferenceType replyTo" and a
    "org.xmlsoap.schemas.ws._2003._03.addressing.AttributedURI messageID".
    HTTP-Analyzer shows that invoking the BPEL process with initiate("somestring", null, null) results in sending a SOAP message to the BPEL process, which returns a "202 Accepted". How do I get the response from the process? My intuition tells me that I have to use that second argument, that EnpointReferenceType thing. How do I use that?
    Another question: If a asynchronous BPEL process does not exists (so the endpoint does not exist) the Java proxy does not throw an error when runned. It does not even sends a message. It exits with status 0! (This happens for example when deploying a new version of a process and when the "old" version is undeployed). Calling a non-existing synchronous BPEL process, the Java proxy DOES throw an error.

    Clemens,
    That all sounds logical. But somehow it is still a mystery for me ... Somehow I don't see what should be done.
    To call the async BPEL process I have the following procedure:
    initiate(String input, org.xmlsoap.schemas.ws._2003._03.addressing.EndpointReferenceType replyTo, org.xmlsoap.schemas.ws._2003._03.addressing.AttributedURI messageID)
    The first argument is the input for my BPEL process. The second is the address to a webservice that should handle the callback, right? The third is a messageID (makes sense, but why of the type AttributedURI?).
    Here lies my problem. It is not clear to me how these EndpointReferenceType & AttributedURI work. I can't find anything on the net about it. The AXIS examples as where mentioned earlier use other types (namely the "org.xmlsoap.schemas.ws.addressing.MessageID" and "org.xmlsoap.schemas.ws.addressing.ReplyTo") which are completely different.
    What I did so far:
    - I created an webservice proxy that listens on the onResult endpoint of the BPEL process.
    - I created an webservice proxy that calls the BPEL process through the initiate procedure, but it is not completely clear to me how to construct the EndPointreferenceType replyTo, and the MessageID. I did something like this:
    EndpointReferenceType replyTo = new EndpointReferenceType();
    // callback service running on local machine
    // This URI class is the java.net's version
    URI replyToURI = new URI("http://vaccinatie:8988/syncro-callback-context-root/stringconcatCallbackBindingPort");
    // This AttributedURI is the org.xmlsoap.schemas.ws._2003._03.addressing's version
    AttributedURI address = new AttributedURI();
    // the only public methos that made sense to me:
    address.set_value(replyToURI);
    replyTo.setAddress(address);
    // call the BPEL process
    myPort.initiate("test123", replyTo, address);
    But the above doesn't work (largely because I don't know what I'm doing here prob.:-) ) It does send the "test123" message, and the BPEL process does process it, but I don't seem to get the callback right.
    I hope this makes my problems somewhat clearer. I hope someone can help me, because I'm just a beginner in this whole "web service area" and seems to do something terribly wrong here, because it should be very simple. Thx.

  • Root element is missing - Response from a WCF service - WCF-Custom adapter

    hi BizTalk experts,
    In the production environment, as soon as the response is getting subscribed by the orchestration, the orchestration instance is getting suspended and the error that shows up in console is 
    "Root element is missing".
    I have checked the actual response message in the console it is a well formed xml. This is happening only for a few responses from the WCF services. A majority of them are getting processed successfully. I have tried getting the parsing the response in a
    pipeline (using custom pipeline component, the production one uses xml receive) and pass it to the orchestration, but it fails giving the same error.
    Thanks in advance.

    Do you have any mapping done on the response message from the WCF service . ?
    If so Better to copy the suspended message coming from the WCF service and validate against the custom response Schema you have created.
    Note : You can try running fiddler tool to check the response from from the web service incase of failure.
    Also try logging the message in the event viewer or any debug tool.
    Thanks
    Abhishek

  • Re: (forte-users) No response from Router partition

    Sounds like what we have been experiencing here, on Unix.
    According to Fort&eacute;, upgrading to 3M should resolve it. Unfortunately, we
    can't
    confirm it yet, as we are in the process of upgrading and testing.
    I believe this is documented as an "internal" Fort&eacute; bug report.
    Hope this hels.
    Daniel D&eacute;sy
    BORN
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Pabbaraju, Ramarao (EXP N-IONIDEA)" <ramarao.pabbarajulmco.com>
    To: "Forte-Users (E-mail)" <forte-userslists.xpedior.com>
    Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 10:46 AM
    Subject: (forte-users) No response from Router partition
    Hi All,
    One of the router partitions on NT server stops responding once in awhile. We can not get to it through escript or econsole and the only
    solution we have is to shutdown the ftexec using task manager and start
    the partition again. We don't see any error messages in the log except
    this line "LbRouter::AttachToRouter - Ignoring DOM version: -1 obj
    version: 0". Does anyone have any idea what this means? Is there any way
    to figure out the problem? We are using Forte 3L3. Thanks in advance.
    Thanks
    Ramarao--
    For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
    the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a
    new
    email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com

    My guess is, your third service object is not referenced.
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Forte App [mailto:forteapphotmail.com]
    Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2000 3:08 PM
    To: kamranaminyahoo.com
    Subject: (forte-users) Partition problem
    Hello Everyone,
    I have three (3) service objects in my project and when i went into
    partition workshop i can only see two service objects instead of three and
    all the three service objects properties settings are same
    iam using Forte 3.0L2.
    Thanks in Advance
    For the archives, go to: http://lists.xpedior.com/forte-users and use
    the login: forte and the password: archive. To unsubscribe, send in a new
    email the word: 'Unsubscribe' to: forte-users-requestlists.xpedior.com

  • RDS 2012 R2: A timeout (30000 milliseconds) was reached while waiting for a transaction response from the (name-of-service) service

    Hi guys,
    On a random base (daily, weekly) we're experiencing major log-in problems on our Windows Server 2012 R2 Remote Desktop Services farm. The VM's are hosted on Hyper-V 2008 hosts and we're not using Citrix techniques etc.
    Users are reporting that they cannot log-in, the log-in sessions hangs with a blank screen when loading their user profile (e.g. Please Wait For The User Profile Service).
    In the System event log of the server on which the user is logging on the following errors are shown:
    Source:        Service Control Manager
    Date:          23-12-2014 7:28:01
    Event ID:      7011
    Task Category: None
    Level:         Error
    Keywords:      Classic
    User:          N/A
    Description:
    A timeout (30000 milliseconds) was reached while waiting for a transaction response from the UmRdpService service.
    …and after 30 (or sometimes 60) seconds, the same error only another service (in random order):
    A timeout (30000 milliseconds) was reached while waiting for a transaction response from the UmRdpService service.
    …and after exactly 30 seconds, the same error only another service:
    A timeout (30000 milliseconds) was reached while waiting for a transaction response from the UxmSms service.
    etcetera, with the following errors:
    A timeout (30000 milliseconds) was reached while waiting for a transaction response from the Netman service.
    A timeout (30000 milliseconds) was reached while waiting for a transaction response from the AudioEndPointBuilder service.
    A timeout (30000 milliseconds) was reached while waiting for a transaction response from the WPDBusEnum service.
    A timeout (30000 milliseconds) was reached while waiting for a transaction response from the NlaSvc service.
    The Portable Device Enumerator Service service failed to start due to the following error:
    The service did not respond to the start or control request in a timely fashion.
    A timeout (30000 milliseconds) was reached while waiting for a transaction response from the TrkWks service.
    A timeout (30000 milliseconds) was reached while waiting for a transaction response from the UmRdpService service.
    These errors are logged continuously.
    An administrator cannot solve this since he isn't able to login in as well (console or remotely), only a hard reset of the VM is possible to use the affected server again.
    I took different steps to solve this problem without any success, like:
    - Installing the latest Windows updates
    - Removed unnecessary printer drivers, print monitors and print processors (no local printers/drivers are installed, only Remote Desktop Easy Printer driver is used)
    - Searched different forum posts, but found only hotfixes for Windows Server 2008 R2.
    Can someone please help me with this annoying problem?
    Many thanks!!
    EDIT:
    Of course is increasing the time-out not really an option here... http://social.technet.microsoft.com/wiki/contents/articles/13765.event-id-7011-service-timeout.aspx

    Hi Jeroentjuhh,
    1)Do you see this problem on all VM's or only on Windows 2012 R2 server?
    2)Are these VMs' in hyper-v cluster?
    3)Do you see event id 56 or 50? Please see the below link if it helps you to resolve these events.
    http://blogs.msdn.com/b/scstr/archive/2012/02/29/how-to-troubleshoot-the-terminal-server-security-layer-detected-an-error-in-the-protocol-stream-and-has-disconnected-the-client-client-ip-and-the-rdp-protocol-component-x-224-detected-an-error-in-the-protocol-stream-and-has-d.aspx
    Thanks,
    Umesh.S.K

  • Received response from host (router IP address) with invalid source port 32784

    I replaced my old wireless router with a Cisco Linksys E4200, running firmware version 1.0.02 build 13  May 24, 2011.  About once a minute the router sends an unsolicited DNS message to the IPV4 multicast address 01:00:5e:00:00:fb with a destination IP address of 224.0.0.251.  The unsolicited message is a DNS response with source port 32784, transaction ID 0, flags 0x8400 (standard query response, no error), questions 0, answer RRs 2, authority RRs 0 and additional RRs 1.  The two answers both relate to the router itself: one has Name Cisco18738.local, type A (host address), class 1 (IN), cache flush true, time to live 1 minute, data length 4, and the address of the router.  The other is the reverse of the same address.  The additional record is for Cisco18738.local, type NSEC, class IN, cache flush true, time to live 1 minute, data length 5, next domain name Cisco18738.local, RR type A (host address).
    When my desktop computer receives these messages it logs an error, for example: "Jun 23 07:39:22 sauterws02 avahi-daemon[1067]: Received response from host 10.146.9.1 with invalid source port 32784 on interface 'eth0.0'"  The 10.146.9.1 is the router's IP address.  I also see these messages on the wireless link from my laptop.
    I suppose the E4200 is generating these DNS messages in a misguided attempt to make sure there is no old information about its name.  Is there a way to turn them off?  If not, is there a way to report this to Cisco as a bug?
    Solved!
    Go to Solution.

    gv wrote:
    1. To contact Linksys, call support.
    2. From the internet draft: "Multicast DNS implementations MUST
    silently ignore any Multicast DNS Responses they receive where the
    source UDP port is not 5353." Your avahi-daemon does not comply with this draft.
    Thank you for the reference.  For the sake of others who may read this thread, the current draft of multicast DNS is at http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns-14.txt. 
    Here is the whole paragraph from which you quoted, from section 6 (Responding): "The source UDP port in all Multicast DNS Responses MUST be 5353 (the well-known port assigned to mDNS). Multicast DNS implementations MUST silently ignore any Multicast DNS Responses they receive where the source UDP port is not 5353."
    Thus, it appears that there are two errors here: the Cisco E4200 is not using 5353 as the source port, and the logger is not silently ignoring it.
    The message appears to be an announcement rather than an actual response to a query.  In section 8.3 (Announcing) I found this paragraph: "A Multicast DNS Responder MUST NOT send announcements in the absence of information that its network connectivity may have changed in some relevant way. In particular, a Multicast DNS Responder MUST NOT send regular periodic announcements as a matter of course."  Thus, it appears that there are three errors here.

  • No Response from Server at end of day:  4.03

    We're using Weblogic 4.03 on Solaris. At the end of a busy day, users
    start submitting their transactions and some users start calling the
    help desk saying that performance is very slow and I believe they are
    getting "No Response from Server" from their browser.
    We think it's the number of Execute Threads defined. I have provided
    the settings when we received HelpDesk calls. We have also modified the
    settings as mentioned below.
    Some questions.
    When does an Execute thread get used?
    Can an execute thread be used for a long period of time (many seconds)
    based on weblogic property settings?
    Do the keepAlive properties keep a thread alive?
    Does a connection keep a thread alive?
    Does anyone know a way to monitor thread usage in 4.03?
    In what situations can a connection use more than 1 thread?
    Does anyone think we're on the right track?
    We have defined the JRE to have a 64 meg heap.
    We looked at the T3AdminMain console and at one point and saw 27
    connections being used. It's hard for us to determine if this was the
    high point for the day. We're not sure how to capture this type of
    info. We're thinking if there were 27 connections and each of those
    connections was somehow using 2 threads, this might explain the problem.
    About our application, we have HTTP and HTTP requests coming through a
    browser client and we also have a Java UI client executing T3s
    connections.
    The browser version sees a user login to the application without being
    timed out for 20 minutes (1200 seconds). We have reduced this to 900
    seconds.
    Basically, we're not sure how Weblogic handles threads based on the
    properties we've used. We have looked for documentation on this, but
    have not found any. Any help would be much appreciated.
    Please reply to my email id as well, if that's not too much trouble.
    Thanks in advance for any help...
    Mike
    Here are some of our property file settings when we received the
    problem:
    weblogic.httpd.http.keepAliveSecs: 60
    weblogic.httpd.https.keepAliveSecs: 360
    weblogic.httpd.session.cacheEntries: 1024
    weblogic.httpd.session.invalidationIntervalSecs: 60
    weblogic.httpd.session.jdbc.connTimeoutSecs: 120
    weblogic.httpd.session.swapIntervalSecs: 10
    weblogic.httpd.session.timeoutSecs: 1200
    weblogic.system.executeThreadCount: 42
    weblogic.system.percentSocketReaders: 33
    We have changed the settings below and restarted the server. We have
    not received any feedback yet.
    weblogic.httpd.http.keepAliveSecs: 30
    weblogic.httpd.https.keepAliveSecs: 180
    weblogic.httpd.session.timeoutSecs: 900
    weblogic.system.executeThreadCount: 60

    I've read previous threads about the problem with 4.5 and the rebuilding of the
    bean cache on each method call resulting in slowdown of the system over time. I
    also see that patches have been provided. Is this also an issue with 4.0.3 and
    have fixes been made there? We also are seeing significant degradation of
    performance over time during our load testing and have been unable to determine
    the cause. We are running on a 4 processor NT machine with 1 gigabyte of RAM.
    When we see the degradation of performance, one processor is operating at 100%
    and memory is maxed out.
    Thanks,
    Jim Gish
    Venkatesh Iyer wrote:
    Mike
    To begin with, can you
    a) please check the access.log to determine the the "arrival rate" of the
    HTTP request. If the requests are not arriving fast enough, tuning WLS will
    not help.
    b) monitor the WLS server through the console to check the # of requests in
    the queue waiting to be processed. This will give an idea of the potential
    source of the bottlenecks in the system.
    Mike Upton wrote:
    We're using Weblogic 4.03 on Solaris. At the end of a busy day, users
    start submitting their transactions and some users start calling the
    help desk saying that performance is very slow and I believe they are
    getting "No Response from Server" from their browser.
    We think it's the number of Execute Threads defined. I have provided
    the settings when we received HelpDesk calls. We have also modified the
    settings as mentioned below.
    Some questions.
    When does an Execute thread get used?
    Can an execute thread be used for a long period of time (many seconds)
    based on weblogic property settings?
    Do the keepAlive properties keep a thread alive?
    Does a connection keep a thread alive?
    Does anyone know a way to monitor thread usage in 4.03?
    In what situations can a connection use more than 1 thread?
    Does anyone think we're on the right track?
    We have defined the JRE to have a 64 meg heap.
    We looked at the T3AdminMain console and at one point and saw 27
    connections being used. It's hard for us to determine if this was the
    high point for the day. We're not sure how to capture this type of
    info. We're thinking if there were 27 connections and each of those
    connections was somehow using 2 threads, this might explain the problem.
    About our application, we have HTTP and HTTP requests coming through a
    browser client and we also have a Java UI client executing T3s
    connections.
    The browser version sees a user login to the application without being
    timed out for 20 minutes (1200 seconds). We have reduced this to 900
    seconds.
    Basically, we're not sure how Weblogic handles threads based on the
    properties we've used. We have looked for documentation on this, but
    have not found any. Any help would be much appreciated.
    Please reply to my email id as well, if that's not too much trouble.
    Thanks in advance for any help...
    Mike
    Here are some of our property file settings when we received the
    problem:
    weblogic.httpd.http.keepAliveSecs: 60
    weblogic.httpd.https.keepAliveSecs: 360
    weblogic.httpd.session.cacheEntries: 1024
    weblogic.httpd.session.invalidationIntervalSecs: 60
    weblogic.httpd.session.jdbc.connTimeoutSecs: 120
    weblogic.httpd.session.swapIntervalSecs: 10
    weblogic.httpd.session.timeoutSecs: 1200
    weblogic.system.executeThreadCount: 42
    weblogic.system.percentSocketReaders: 33
    We have changed the settings below and restarted the server. We have
    not received any feedback yet.
    weblogic.httpd.http.keepAliveSecs: 30
    weblogic.httpd.https.keepAliveSecs: 180
    weblogic.httpd.session.timeoutSecs: 900
    weblogic.system.executeThreadCount: 60
    [jgish.vcf]

  • "500 Internal Server Error" response from asynchronous AquaLogic proxy

    Hi,
    We have a proxy service deployed to AquaLogic Service Bus (alsb) v3.0 as a WSDL-based SOAP/HTTP service. The WSDL for the proxy defines a single one-way operation (i.e. no response message is defined), making it an asynchronous operation. The proxy routes the request through a couple business services and then routes the response to a URL specified in the request (in the ReplyTo element of a WS-Addressing header). Essentially it's an asynchronous request-response pattern that accepts requests from a web service and calls back to that web service with the response.
    This proxy service works perfectly when run from the test page in the ALSB console. However, when calling the proxy from the real client web service, AquaLogic returns a "500" response from the HTTP POST. The WSDL and everything look correct, and we can use the proxy's URL to download the WSDL with no problem.
    Is this a known problem?
    Thanks!
    -Eric

    HI,
    I am looking for a solution to the problem (i am using Oracle service Bus_10.3).
    After publishing, I can get the wsdl from the web browser but calling the proxy service directly results:
    com.bea.control.ServiceControlException: Unexpected exception raised invoking getTerminalDistance on control com.demo.control.TerminalLocationServiceControl. Use getCause() to see the root cause.[java.rmi.RemoteException: SOAPFaultException - FaultCode [{http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/}Server] FaultString [BEA-380001: Internal Server Error] FaultActor [null] Detail [<detail><con:fault xmlns:con="http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/context"><con:errorCode>BEA-380001</con:errorCode><con:reason>Internal Server Error</con:reason><con:location><con:node>RouteNode3</con:node><con:path>response-pipeline</con:path></con:location></con:fault></detail>]; nested exception is:
         weblogic.wsee.jaxrpc.soapfault.WLSOAPFaultException: BEA-380001: Internal Server Error]
         at com.bea.control.servicecontrol.impl.ServiceControlImpl.invoke(ServiceControlImpl.java:696)
         at com.demo.control.TerminalLocationServiceControlBean.getTerminalDistance(TerminalLocationServiceControlBean.java:132)
         at com.demo.control.TerminalLocationImpl.getTerminalDistance(TerminalLocationImpl.java:51)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
         at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
         at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
         at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
         at weblogic.wsee.component.pojo.JavaClassComponent.invoke(JavaClassComponent.java:112)
         at weblogic.wsee.ws.dispatch.server.ComponentHandler.handleRequest(ComponentHandler.java:84)
         at weblogic.wsee.handler.HandlerIterator.handleRequest(HandlerIterator.java:141)
         at weblogic.wsee.ws.dispatch.server.ServerDispatcher.dispatch(ServerDispatcher.java:114)
         at weblogic.wsee.ws.WsSkel.invoke(WsSkel.java:80)
         at weblogic.wsee.server.servlet.SoapProcessor.handlePost(SoapProcessor.java:66)
         at weblogic.wsee.server.servlet.SoapProcessor.process(SoapProcessor.java:44)
         at weblogic.wsee.server.servlet.BaseWSServlet$AuthorizedInvoke.run(BaseWSServlet.java:285)
         at weblogic.wsee.server.servlet.BaseWSServlet.service(BaseWSServlet.java:169)
         at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper$ServletServiceAction.run(StubSecurityHelper.java:227)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper.invokeServlet(StubSecurityHelper.java:125)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:292)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:175)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.run(WebAppServletContext.java:3504)
         at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321)
         at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(Unknown Source)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.securedExecute(WebAppServletContext.java:2186)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.execute(WebAppServletContext.java:2092)
         at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.run(ServletRequestImpl.java:1406)
         at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:201)
         at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:173)
    Caused by: java.rmi.RemoteException: SOAPFaultException - FaultCode [{http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/}Server] FaultString [BEA-380001: Internal Server Error] FaultActor [null] Detail [<detail><con:fault xmlns:con="http://www.bea.com/wli/sb/context"><con:errorCode>BEA-380001</con:errorCode><con:reason>Internal Server Error</con:reason><con:location><con:node>RouteNode3</con:node><con:path>response-pipeline</con:path></con:location></con:fault></detail>]; nested exception is:
         weblogic.wsee.jaxrpc.soapfault.WLSOAPFaultException: BEA-380001: Internal Server Error
         at weblogic.wsee.jaxrpc.StubImpl.throwRemoteException(StubImpl.java:296)
    I have implemented one testservice and trying to invoke Aqualogic proxy using service control generated through weblogic workshop and getting above error. but if I use test console of Service bus to test this proxy, it runs fine. Also I have configured proxy service message flow where i am using "Replace" action to replce the header from the incoming reuest with the following as my business service expects this security token:
    <soap:Header xmlns:soap="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/">
    <wsse:Security xmlns:wsse="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd" soap:mustUnderstand="1">
    <wsse:UsernameToken xmlns:wsu="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd" wsu:Id="UsernameToken-24512621">
    <wsse:Username>sample:parlayx</wsse:Username>
    <wsse:Password Type="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-username-token-profile-1.0#PasswordText">1234</wsse:Password>
    </wsse:UsernameToken>
    </wsse:Security>
    </soap:Header>
    please Please share any additional configuration/settings needed.
    thanks
    Narendra

  • Format of response from distributed form

    Hi guys,
    I have been working with a trial of Acrobat X Pro and Livecycle ES II, to determine if we can use it effectively to replace paper forms in our workplace. We have also recently deployed Alfresco, an open source CMS, which is very tightly integrated with what we would like to do with Adobe forms. I am a little confused though, at trying to figure out what controls the format of the response.
    With the forms I create in liveCycle, when distributed, the response seems to be either a pdf or an xml file. The first few forms I designed arrived on the server as pdf's when I tested them (which is exactly what I wanted). The last couple I have created (using liveCycle) however, seem to always arrive as xml. I have gone through every page of the Distribute... wizard with what I feel is rather a fine toothed comb but cannot find anywhere to control this.
    Today I have discovered that Alfresco is unable to parse the form fields in the liveCycle PDF's (this is to do with the Tika parser and PDFBox, but isn't really related to this disccussion directly), so I have switched to Acrobat which, in my testing so far, does create forms parsable by Tika. When I distribute the form from Acrobat though, the responses always seem to be in xfdf format (which seems to boil down to xml anyway).
    I am sure that actual PDF's were created at some point. I still have test distribution folders full of pdf responses. Does anyone know what I am missing which controls the response??

    Hi Bill,
    I know the data format would be alot more useful if we were just needing to get the data into a database or some other process or application, but the need here is moreso for the actual PDF. This is also required to be an automated process, so importing the data files into acrobat manually is not an option.
    When you say are we collecting data by email or web script, I am not 100% sure I understand. When we choose distribute form... there are three choices - collect responses on Acrobat.com, collect responses in my email inbox, and collect choices in our own server. We choose the latter of the three (own server) and specify the CIFS path to a folder on the Alfresco server.
    Essentially all I need here is to find out which setting allows me to have pdf's (not xml or fdf or xfdf) collected in the responses folder when the form is distributed using the "own server" option. When I go through the distribute wizard, the only options I set seem to be: How the data is collected (own server), the path to the server, whether or not to collect name and email and the server profile name. (although now I think of it, I believe that originally I was leaving the "collect name and email" checkbox ticked originally when I was seeing actual PDF's collected, so I may try that now. If that's the setting controlling the response format though I would be surprised and find it incredibly unintuitive).

  • How to get a response from Adobe Support

    Greetings
    I purchased an upgrade to Photoshop Elements 6.0 for Mac from the Adobe website on August 1st, and the serial number that was sent to me does not work.  I have a registered copy of PSE 3.0, so I assume that an upgrade should be possible, but when I try to enter the serial number, I get a "serial number is not valid" error. I have worked through the various FAQs, to no effect.  So on August 6th I lodged a support case, using the online form.  10 days have now elapsed, with no response from Adobe: the status of the case is "Open - Pending Adobe Response".  Does anyone have any suggestions on how I might either get the issued serial number to work, or induce Adobe to acknowledge the problem?
    rgds
    Melodie

    Barbara,
    As an "Expert" you should be able to answer this. I downloaded the trial version of PE6, determined that I could use it, uninstalled it, and bought a new copy from our local dealer (like to buy local). Tried to installed that no less than five times and have never been able to do so. Most of the time the support files will install but the actual app fails to install. One time the install appeared to work, but clicking on the icon or the actual program in Applications resulted in nothing, nada, no response at all. Uninstalled after each attempt. Reinstalled the trial copy and tried to enter the actual serial number off the bought package, but we all know that will NEVER work. (Good joke, Adobe) Uninstalled the trial yet again. Have done restarts, made sure all other program were closed, emptied the trash, made a cup of tea, left the office, did everytihing I can think of to try and coax this ridulous piece of software to properly install. I know it works because the trial version worked fine (before it expired).
    I thought, well Adobe Support should be able to clear this up. Perhaps if I could ever actually get someone on the phone that might be the case, although many, many web discussion seem to suggest that would not happen. I have spent over four hours this week listening to the same three songs on the support line and NEVER ONCE had a live person pick up the phone.
    How do I get this abomination to work properly? The helpful tips that might be contained on this page do no good if one can not install and run the program.
    Jeff

  • Efax/HylaFAX - No Response From modem(ttyS1)

    Dear all,
       I install arch on an old laptop: ASUS Z9100 laptop (it has two systems: windows xp and Arch Linux version 3.4.9-1-ARCH). This laptop has a 56K Fax/Modem. Its detail is(lspci):
    00:1f.6 Modem: Intel Corporation 82801DB/DBL/DBM (ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) AC'97 Modem Controller (rev 03) (prog-if 00 [Generic])
    Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. M6800N
    Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 17
    I/O ports at e200 [size=256]
    I/O ports at e300 [size=128]
    Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2
    Kernel driver in use: snd_intel8x0m
        And it works in windows xp (can send and recieve fax).
        I install both efax and HylaFAX on arch, but it doesn't work. The efax response:
    [root@s2 efax-0.9a-001114]# ./efax -d /dev/ttyS1
    ./efax: Sat Aug 25 17:41:52 2012 efax v 0.9a-001114 Copyright 1999 Ed Casas
    ./efax: Sat Aug 25 17:41:52 2012 efax v 0.9a-001114 Copyright 1999 Ed Casas
    efax: 41:52 compiled Aug 25 2012 17:32:27
    efax: 41:52 opened /dev/ttyS1
    efax: 41:58 sync: dropping DTR
    efax: 42:03 sync: sending escapes
    efax: 42:08 Error: sync: modem not responding
    efax: 42:08 done, returning 4 (no response from modem)
        More information:
    [root@s2 efax-0.9a-001114]# ls /dev/
    agpgart core fw0 mapper ppp sda1 sdb1 tty0 tty17 tty25 tty33 tty41 tty5 tty58 tty9 vcs2 vcsa4
    autofs cpu hidraw0 mcelog psaux sda10 shm tty1 tty18 tty26 tty34 tty42 tty50 tty59 ttyS0 vcs3 vcsa5
    block cpu_dma_latency hidraw1 mem ptmx sda2 snapshot tty10 tty19 tty27 tty35 tty43 tty51 tty6 ttyS1 vcs4 vcsa6
    bsg disk hpet net pts sda5 snd tty11 tty2 tty28 tty36 tty44 tty52 tty60 ttyS2 vcs5 vga_arbiter
    btrfs-control dri initctl network_latency random sda6 sr0 tty12 tty20 tty29 tty37 tty45 tty53 tty61 ttyS3 vcs6 vhost-net
    bus fb0 input network_throughput rfkill sda7 stderr tty13 tty21 tty3 tty38 tty46 tty54 tty62 uinput vcsa watchdog
    cdrom fd kmsg null rtc sda8 stdin tty14 tty22 tty30 tty39 tty47 tty55 tty63 urandom vcsa1 zero
    char full log parport0 rtc0 sda9 stdout tty15 tty23 tty31 tty4 tty48 tty56 tty7 vcs vcsa2
    console fuse loop-control port sda sdb tty tty16 tty24 tty32 tty40 tty49 tty57 tty8 vcs1 vcsa3
       Any suggestions?
    Thanks!

    I haven't worked with HylaxFax in a few years, and never used Efax.  But from what I remember HylaFax was *very* particular about the modem.  Did you confirm yours is one of the supported ones ?  Back then there were really only a few that definitely worked, along with many that were only partially supported and even more that just wouldn't work.   
    I bought an older, external MultiTech Multimodem specifically for HylaFax, since it was one of the "definitely works" variey.  Even then I had to reset it frequently.  Maybe things have improved since then, and I remember doing a lot of terminal commands directly to the serial port.
    So I'd recommend confirming your modem is officially supported, then checking if there are any commands you can run to check, reset, or manually test it.

  • No response from itunes

    I have a new shuffle and it everything worked fine when I first set it up and after plugging it in a few times to sync some new music. It quit working so I assumed the battery died. I plugged it into the port and got no response from itunes - just three green blinks then a "found new hardware wizard" popup on my desktop. Any suggestions?

    I successfully installed both Itunes 5.0 & quicktime 7.0, but when i luanch either one the icon jumps up and down. After a few jumps it, the application doesn't start. Same thing happens when i launch from the application menu.
    In any application when you click and hold the icon in the dock you get a set of options( usuallyquit*hideshow in finder* etc.etc.), but with either of these applications the very top line reads as follows. Application not responding.
    I've tried to quit and restart the application but the same thing happens.
    Yet for some reason i still have the option of going to the force quit option and quitting the application the never responded. I have tried to trash that download and and do it again, but the same thing happens. I don't think it is the download because i got them both from Apple. All of my music is still there, and so are the movies. i just don't have a clue whats wrong .

  • ESB is not receiving response from BPEL

    I have routing rule in ESB which routes the input to BPEL process.
    ESB is not receving any response from BPEL
    When I execute BPEL process independently, BPEL process is completing successfully and returning response.
    but when I invoked (Sync/Async) it from ESB, I am simply getting empty response back.
    in ESB console I got following message
    An unhandled exception has been thrown in the ESB system. The exception reported is: "com.oracle.bpel.client.delivery.ReceiveTimeOutException: Waiting for response has timed out. The conversation id is 7836DD907BDE11DCBFEDA1C287EB1942. Please check the process instance for detail. at com.evermind.server.rmi.RMICall.EXCEPTION_ORIGINATES_FROM_THE_REMOTE_SERVER(RMICall.java:109) at com.evermind.server.rmi.RMICall.throwRecordedException(RMICall.java:125) at com.evermind.server.rmi.RMIClientConnection.obtainRemoteMethodResponse(RMIClientConnection.java:517) at com.evermind.server.rmi.RMIClientConnection.invokeMethod(RMIClientConnection.java:461) at com.evermind.server.rmi.RemoteInvocationHandler.invoke(RemoteInvocationHandler.java:63) at com.evermind.server.rmi.RecoverableRemoteInvocationHandler.invoke(RecoverableRemoteInvocationHandler.java:28) at com.evermind.server.ejb.StatelessSessionRemoteInvocationHandler.invoke(StatelessSessionRemoteInvocationHandler.java:43) at __Proxy10.request(Unknown Source) at com.oracle.bpel.client.delivery.DeliveryService.request(DeliveryService.java:104) at com.oracle.bpel.client.delivery.DeliveryService.request(DeliveryService.java:67) at oracle.tip.esb.server.service.impl.bpel.BPELService.processBusinessEvent(BPELService.java:380) at oracle.tip.esb.server.dispatch.InitialEventDispatcher.dispatchNonRoutingService(InitialEventDispatcher.java:106) at oracle.tip.esb.server.dispatch.InitialEventDispatcher.dispatch(InitialEventDispatcher.java:85) at oracle.tip.esb.server.dispatch.BusinessEvent.raise(BusinessEvent.java:1416) at oracle.tip.esb.utils.EventUtils.raiseBusinessEvent(EventUtils.java:105) at oracle.tip.esb.server.service.EsbRouterSubscription.onBusinessEvent(EsbRouterSubscription.java:273) at oracle.tip.esb.server.dispatch.EventDispatcher.executeSubscription(EventDispatcher.java:138) at oracle.tip.esb.server.dispatch.DeferredEventDispatcher.processSubscriptions(DeferredEventDispatcher.java:150) at oracle.tip.esb.se
    Thanks
    Praveen

    Is it possible to add several checkpoint in embedded java too your process to see where (on which activity) it fails.
    no extra information in the domain.log of bpel on this process ?
    it's possible that the bpel is started, the first activity executes ok, but the second fails ( for example xslt error) and if the process isn't dehydrated , you wont see any output in the console, but the process is already started..

Maybe you are looking for