Threads Getting Deleted

Yesterday one person had a topic talking about not getting answers because people in this forum would turn most threads into personal chats... I dont know what happened later but as I left it was a fair defendable discussion. Today, it has been deleted... So I guess that someone gut ruff and started using foul language or started using sentences not conform with the rules of this forum... OK.
It seems that if threads are containing contents that are not complying with the regulations of this forum tend to get deleted.... I understand that and respect it... However, that is the reason why I write this... If one does ask a REAL question and others answers this question but answers it in a "Funny" way only to start conversation and turn the thread into a personal chat why does the thread not get deleted - cuz personal chats(Which happens ALOT on this forum) are also not conform with the rules of this forum... I HATE when I ask a question or reply to one to have people answering or responding that have absolute no idea of what they be talking about only cuz they have nothing better to do.... This is what the thread was about that just got deleted and I think it is too bad cuz it was a real good topic... I myself hang at the DUC (digidesign) and there it is somewhat different than here.... Only people knowing something about the topic posted are answering(Mostly) and that is very nice. I've been hanging there since february and have yet to see a thread deleted(I am not there 24/7 so I might have missed some). But in this forum threads getting deleted and locked all the time and the tone of many of these threads are of improper manor. I'M not saying that I cant take hard words of true spoken language...But what I can't hear is when questions are being asked and someone, Obviously not knowing what he says, be answering posts only cuz he seeking attention.... Mister Moderator, should you read this : then please also have the decency to delete posts of INCOMPETENT NATURE. And while I'M at it : Warn people when they start to use this forum as a friend finder or chat room

I do close my eyes to those things and that is why i dont answer questions which I am not 100% sure of. It is the people starting personal chats over topics out of they reach that should learn to close they eyes and not respond to everything that gets posted... Specially if they know little or nothing about the matter. I know that many of you guys here that I often get into BIG no HUGE discussions with like Jord, iSchwarz, Mr. Robinson, Rohan Stevenson, Justin, X4IS etc...answer many a quastions and are really devoted to this forum which I respect... I have seldom hear one of you answer on a question U had no Idea of. But there are many that do and that is what I think is wrong.... And then some poor guy comes along asking how people can find any answers with all that personal stuff going on here and BOOM his post gets trashed... That was what sparked me cuz there are many other posts here that has nothing to do with the topic of Logic Pro... and there are many serious threads getting defaulted to rubbish cuz people wanna make jokes or have nothing better to than SCRE* Around... People can do what they want but if the Logic Admin is deleting posts cuz they have nothing to do with Logic then he should be consistent and do all over the line and not only on certain threads... OR they should change the regulations to : Personal chat i welcome here... And might I ad, you guys know that I dont mean speaking nice to one another etc or asking "How are you" when answering a thread....

Similar Messages

Why did the thread get locked or deleted?

Disclaimer: Apple does not necessarily endorse any suggestions, solutions, or third-party software products that may be mentioned in the topic below. Apple encourages you to first seek a solution at Apple Support. The following links are provided as is, with no guarantee of the effectiveness or reliability of the information. Apple does not guarantee that these links will be maintained or functional at any given time. Use the information below at your own discretion.
Occasionally you may see a thread get locked or deleted, or the possibility of a user having been banned. This tip is a viewpoint of an end user of how the Terms of Use apply to deletions, locks, or bans. Moderators may at their discretion choose these actions as the Terms of Use allow them to, even when none of these points below matter.
When you signed up on this board, a Terms of Use page was agreed to in order for you to enter. That Terms of Use page is also on the link "Help & Terms of Use" on the right hand side. Posts themselves may get deleted that weren't the source of the thread being locked or deleted. So if you didn't disobey the Terms of use, someone else might have.
Do not take either as a sign of censorship, a sign of personal chastisement, or anything negative per say. This is after all a community open to the public.
When one of the terms of use is violated, it is either because it does not offer constructive points of view for fixing a technical issue from end user to end user, or it is overly digressive from doing such actions. Terms of use suggest to avoid:
1. Prognosticating.
2. Guessing Apple's policy.
3. Offer advice on something which may be against copyright laws.
4. Offer advice on something which would violate a license agreement.
5. Posting in a thread with "me toos". Try to solve the problem at hand. It makes it very hard for those of us trying to help the original poster when additional people chime in, saying they too have the same problem, or have a problem almost identical. Those trying to help
the original poster, may not know if the solution applies to all the people having the problem, or just some. It ends up requiring people coming to help to directly address a person to avoid confusing who should follow various advice.
A Post New Topic is available at all Forum levels, but at the Category level of Discussions. For more on this discussion, see the tip here:
http://discussions.apple.com/ann.jspa?annID=650
6. Other things which may be illegal in the State of California or in the United States of America
should not be suggested or inferred by what you post.
7. Rants or complaints about people and companies.
They are unhelpful, and really don't solve technical issues.
Approach complaints with tact when posting in a public forum that is moderated such as this one.
It is one thing to say, I hate this feature being missing, is there any way to get this feature added, or are there any ways of getting it from another source?
It is another thing to blame Apple for a feature that is missing, and drop the ball at that waiting for a response. These type of posts are more likely to be frowned upon.
Complaining of a service not rendered is also often frowned upon. There are points of contact later in this tip to address such service issues. This is a forum for addressing technical inquiries about how things work or if things can be made to work on your system.
8. Polls asking for a feature to be added/removed are generally frowned upon, as well as polls about various apparent defects and their propensity. You are only addressing less than 1% of the Apple using population here.
Such polls would not be very scientific even if they are carried out for long periods of time. Long threads may appear to act as polls, and may violate terms of use. If you see such a thread and wonder why it hasn't been locked or deleted, you are welcome to ask that in Discussions Feedback, or click on "Report This Post" at the bottom right corner if available.
As the Terms of Use state, in the end essentially it is up to the moderator to decide if a thread is worthy being deleted or locked. Don't take it personally if it is. Also Level 2 through Level 5 users, while we can ask the moderators look at a thread, we are not Apple Employees. You may also ask a moderator look at a thread or an individual on the Discussion Feedback forum or by clicking Report this post at the bottom right hand corner of a specific post.
If the purpose of your thread is to provide feedback to Apple for a product, see these pages:
http://www.apple.com/contact/
http://www.apple.com/feedback/
http://www.apple.com/contact/feedback.html
If you have isolated a bug with a procedure worthy of a software developer, sign up for a free developer account on http://developer.apple.com/ and report the bug here:
http://bugreporter.apple.com/
As this is a user to user forum answers may not come right away. Have patience, and usually someone eventually can come up with an answer. Some forums may not fit the subject line of your topic, and you are welcome to ask if you are unsure where to post a topic.
This is the 2nd version of this tip. It was submitted on September 28, 2010 by a brody.
Do you want to provide feedback on this User Contributed Tip or contribute your own? If you have achieved Level 2 status, visit the User Tips Library Contributions forum for more information.

Disclaimer: Apple does not necessarily endorse any suggestions, solutions, or third-party software products that may be mentioned in the topic below. Apple encourages you to first seek a solution at Apple Support. The following links are provided as is, with no guarantee of the effectiveness or reliability of the information. Apple does not guarantee that these links will be maintained or functional at any given time. Use the information below at your own discretion.
Occasionally you may see a thread get locked or deleted, or the possibility of a user having been banned. This tip is a viewpoint of an end user of how the Terms of Use apply to deletions, locks, or bans. Moderators may at their discretion choose these actions as the Terms of Use allow them to, even when none of these points below matter.
When you signed up on this board, a Terms of Use page was agreed to in order for you to enter. That Terms of Use page is also on the link "Help & Terms of Use" on the right hand side. Posts themselves may get deleted that weren't the source of the thread being locked or deleted. So if you didn't disobey the Terms of use, someone else might have.
Do not take either as a sign of censorship, a sign of personal chastisement, or anything negative per say. This is after all a community open to the public.
When one of the terms of use is violated, it is either because it does not offer constructive points of view for fixing a technical issue from end user to end user, or it is overly digressive from doing such actions. Terms of use suggest to avoid:
1. Prognosticating.
2. Guessing Apple's policy.
3. Offer advice on something which may be against copyright laws.
4. Offer advice on something which would violate a license agreement.
5. Posting in a thread with "me toos". Try to solve the problem at hand. It makes it very hard for those of us trying to help the original poster when additional people chime in, saying they too have the same problem, or have a problem almost identical. Those trying to help
the original poster, may not know if the solution applies to all the people having the problem, or just some. It ends up requiring people coming to help to directly address a person to avoid confusing who should follow various advice.
A Post New Topic is available at all Forum levels, but at the Category level of Discussions. For more on this discussion, see the tip here:
http://discussions.apple.com/ann.jspa?annID=650
6. Other things which may be illegal in the State of California or in the United States of America
should not be suggested or inferred by what you post.
7. Rants or complaints about people and companies.
They are unhelpful, and really don't solve technical issues.
Approach complaints with tact when posting in a public forum that is moderated such as this one.
It is one thing to say, I hate this feature being missing, is there any way to get this feature added, or are there any ways of getting it from another source?
It is another thing to blame Apple for a feature that is missing, and drop the ball at that waiting for a response. These type of posts are more likely to be frowned upon.
Complaining of a service not rendered is also often frowned upon. There are points of contact later in this tip to address such service issues. This is a forum for addressing technical inquiries about how things work or if things can be made to work on your system.
8. Polls asking for a feature to be added/removed are generally frowned upon, as well as polls about various apparent defects and their propensity. You are only addressing less than 1% of the Apple using population here.
Such polls would not be very scientific even if they are carried out for long periods of time. Long threads may appear to act as polls, and may violate terms of use. If you see such a thread and wonder why it hasn't been locked or deleted, you are welcome to ask that in Discussions Feedback, or click on "Report This Post" at the bottom right corner if available.
As the Terms of Use state, in the end essentially it is up to the moderator to decide if a thread is worthy being deleted or locked. Don't take it personally if it is. Also Level 2 through Level 5 users, while we can ask the moderators look at a thread, we are not Apple Employees. You may also ask a moderator look at a thread or an individual on the Discussion Feedback forum or by clicking Report this post at the bottom right hand corner of a specific post.
If the purpose of your thread is to provide feedback to Apple for a product, see these pages:
http://www.apple.com/contact/
http://www.apple.com/feedback/
http://www.apple.com/contact/feedback.html
If you have isolated a bug with a procedure worthy of a software developer, sign up for a free developer account on http://developer.apple.com/ and report the bug here:
http://bugreporter.apple.com/
As this is a user to user forum answers may not come right away. Have patience, and usually someone eventually can come up with an answer. Some forums may not fit the subject line of your topic, and you are welcome to ask if you are unsure where to post a topic.
This is the 2nd version of this tip. It was submitted on September 28, 2010 by a brody.
Do you want to provide feedback on this User Contributed Tip or contribute your own? If you have achieved Level 2 status, visit the User Tips Library Contributions forum for more information.

Deleted Item not actually getting deleted or **delay** deleted thus getting refetched (EWS Managed API)

I am polling Exchange Server to fetch all the mails left in the Inbox and then fetching them, processing them and finally moving them to the deleted folder. My procedure takes following form of EWS Managed API calls:
1 itemResults = service.FindItems(WellKnownFolderName.Inbox, itemView);
2 //some code...
3 service.LoadPropertiesForItems(itemResults.Items, itItemPropSet);
4 //some code...
5 foreach(Item item in itemResults)
6 {
7 //process item
8 item.Delete(DeleteMode.MoveToDeletedItems);
9 }
To test this code I flooded the inbox with 5000 mails, 5 threads flooding 1000 mails each at the interval of 4ms.
After test run, I realized some mails are getting processed multiple times.
When I read the soap traces logged using TraceListener, I realized that when there are more than 100 mails in the inbox, there are more SOAP packets were dispatched in burst of 100s.
Logically below set of SOAP Packets (let us call it "Set 1") should occur only once:
<m:FindItem>...</m:FindItem> //generated by line 1
<m:FindItemResponse>...</m:FindItemResponse> //generated by line 1
<m:GetItem>...</m:GetItem> //generated by line 3
<m:GetItemResponse>...</m:GetItemResponse> //generated by line 3
followed x number of Delete SOAP packets for x number of mails in the Inbox
<m:DeleteItem>...</m:DeleteItem> //generated by line 8
<m:DeleteItemRepsonse>...</m:DeleteItemRepsonse> //generated by line 8
However if there are say 325 mails in the inbox, then there first occurs 4 occurences of Set 1 followed by Delete SOAP packest as follows:
//1st occurence
<m:FindItem>100 items</m:FindItem>
<m:FindItemResponse>100 items</m:FindItemResponse>
<m:GetItem>100 items</m:GetItem>
<m:GetItemResponse>35 items</m:GetItemResponse>
//2nd occurence
<m:FindItem>100 items</m:FindItem>
<m:FindItemResponse>100 items</m:FindItemResponse>
<m:GetItem>100 items</m:GetItem>
<m:GetItemResponse>35 items</m:GetItemResponse>
//3rd occurence
<m:FindItem>100 items</m:FindItem>
<m:FindItemResponse>100 items</m:FindItemResponse>
<m:GetItem>100 items</m:GetItem>
<m:GetItemResponse>100 items</m:GetItemResponse>
//4th occurence
<m:FindItem>35 items</m:FindItem>
<m:FindItemResponse>35 items</m:FindItemResponse>
<m:GetItem>35 items</m:GetItem>
<m:GetItemResponse>35 items</m:GetItemResponse> //****followed by 335 occurences of the Delete SOAP packets****<m:DeleteItem>...</m:DeleteItem>
<m:DeleteItemRepsonse>...</m:DeleteItemRepsonse>
//334 more of above
So there are 100 + 100 + 100 + 35 = 335 items actually getting handled, which is 10 more than what are actually present in the inbox.
Also notice that Delete SOAP packets are queued till end. They are not dispatched in burst.
First thing I realize dispatching SOAP packets in burst of 100s is EWS Managed API behavior. I guess there must be traffic reason behind it and there must be some configuration setting to tweak it.
Q1. How can we change this count of 100?
I inferred that there are some overlaps in fetching of mails.
So I copy pasted SOAP Traces for first two of
<m:GetItem>100 items</m:GetItem>
in two different files, and compared them in text comparer. I realised that some mails that are at the end of the first 100s were reappearing at the beginning of 2nd 100:
This is the pattern in many test runs.
Due to this these overlapping mails, these mails are getting processed twice. Also the attempt to second time delete them was throwing exception : The specified object was not found in the store.
So I guess there is time delay in delete mail API call and mails actually getting deleted, between which they are getting refetched.
Q2. How can I handle this to avoid redundant processing of mails and unnecessary exceptions.

I am polling Exchange Server to fetch all the mails left in the Inbox and then fetching them, processing them and finally moving them to the deleted folder. My procedure takes following form of EWS Managed API calls:
1 itemResults = service.FindItems(WellKnownFolderName.Inbox, itemView);
2 //some code...
3 service.LoadPropertiesForItems(itemResults.Items, itItemPropSet);
4 //some code...
5 foreach(Item item in itemResults)
6 {
7 //process item
8 item.Delete(DeleteMode.MoveToDeletedItems);
9 }
To test this code I flooded the inbox with 5000 mails, 5 threads flooding 1000 mails each at the interval of 4ms.
After test run, I realized some mails are getting processed multiple times.
When I read the soap traces logged using TraceListener, I realized that when there are more than 100 mails in the inbox, there are more SOAP packets were dispatched in burst of 100s.
Logically below set of SOAP Packets (let us call it "Set 1") should occur only once:
<m:FindItem>...</m:FindItem> //generated by line 1
<m:FindItemResponse>...</m:FindItemResponse> //generated by line 1
<m:GetItem>...</m:GetItem> //generated by line 3
<m:GetItemResponse>...</m:GetItemResponse> //generated by line 3
followed x number of Delete SOAP packets for x number of mails in the Inbox
<m:DeleteItem>...</m:DeleteItem> //generated by line 8
<m:DeleteItemRepsonse>...</m:DeleteItemRepsonse> //generated by line 8
However if there are say 325 mails in the inbox, then there first occurs 4 occurences of Set 1 followed by Delete SOAP packest as follows:
//1st occurence
<m:FindItem>100 items</m:FindItem>
<m:FindItemResponse>100 items</m:FindItemResponse>
<m:GetItem>100 items</m:GetItem>
<m:GetItemResponse>35 items</m:GetItemResponse>
//2nd occurence
<m:FindItem>100 items</m:FindItem>
<m:FindItemResponse>100 items</m:FindItemResponse>
<m:GetItem>100 items</m:GetItem>
<m:GetItemResponse>35 items</m:GetItemResponse>
//3rd occurence
<m:FindItem>100 items</m:FindItem>
<m:FindItemResponse>100 items</m:FindItemResponse>
<m:GetItem>100 items</m:GetItem>
<m:GetItemResponse>100 items</m:GetItemResponse>
//4th occurence
<m:FindItem>35 items</m:FindItem>
<m:FindItemResponse>35 items</m:FindItemResponse>
<m:GetItem>35 items</m:GetItem>
<m:GetItemResponse>35 items</m:GetItemResponse> //****followed by 335 occurences of the Delete SOAP packets****<m:DeleteItem>...</m:DeleteItem>
<m:DeleteItemRepsonse>...</m:DeleteItemRepsonse>
//334 more of above
So there are 100 + 100 + 100 + 35 = 335 items actually getting handled, which is 10 more than what are actually present in the inbox.
Also notice that Delete SOAP packets are queued till end. They are not dispatched in burst.
First thing I realize dispatching SOAP packets in burst of 100s is EWS Managed API behavior. I guess there must be traffic reason behind it and there must be some configuration setting to tweak it.
Q1. How can we change this count of 100?
I inferred that there are some overlaps in fetching of mails.
So I copy pasted SOAP Traces for first two of
<m:GetItem>100 items</m:GetItem>
in two different files, and compared them in text comparer. I realised that some mails that are at the end of the first 100s were reappearing at the beginning of 2nd 100:
This is the pattern in many test runs.
Due to this these overlapping mails, these mails are getting processed twice. Also the attempt to second time delete them was throwing exception : The specified object was not found in the store.
So I guess there is time delay in delete mail API call and mails actually getting deleted, between which they are getting refetched.
Q2. How can I handle this to avoid redundant processing of mails and unnecessary exceptions.

Workitem not getting deleted from SAP inbox

Hi ,
I have a scenario in workflows , in which when a user creates a timesheet , a mail goes to approver , when the timesheet is approved the mail should get automatically deleted .
We have created a standard task for this purpose ( a copy of TS31000007) .
The business Object is CATS , terminating event is COMPLETED , method is APPROVE . There is no triggereing event a FM is being used .
The standard task is copied in two test environments , from first system the mail gets automatically deleted , but from the second one it is not getting deleted .
Also the workflow log in SWEL doesnt show any rows in the second system .
In the first system , there are 4 steps in the workflow log :
Dialog work item created
Background process started
terminating event received
work item processing complete
Though the workitem has deleted , but the status of the workflow is in Progress
while the second has only two steps in workflow log
Dialog work item created
Background process started
and the workflow status is "Ready"
I guess the terminating event in the second case is not getting received .
but ,I have checked sweinst and found that the instance linkage is activated .
Also when the workitem is approved , it does not get delete , and if we try to re execute it again , the gives a msg " NO data found "
Can someone help me to find why the mail is stuck in the inbox and correct this problem.
Thanks
Sheetal

Unless and until the Terminating event is triggered the workitem will not disappear. Check how the Event is getting triggered in other system. I feel it is getting triggered by standard means. Check whether there is proper settings in SWEHR3.
It means that you are not doing any special configuration for event triggering or coding. Please check what is missing in the system you are having problem. Check SWU3 setting is fine or not.
<b>Please close thread when issue resolved</b>
Thanks
Arghadip
Message was edited by:
Arghadip Kar

Files saved to network server sometimes get deleted

Hello,
I work as a graphic designer using a year old iMac and latest version of Photoshop CS5.
Every now and then when saving a .psd file with photoshop it will get deleted instead. As an example, lets say I'm working on a brochure cover image. I open photoshop, open the file and work couple of hours on it. Then I save it. File gets deleted and is now no where to be found. Assuming no backups it's lost for good.
Naturally I use backups so this usually only means I've at most lost a days worth of work, but it's still highly irritating as you can get quite a bit done during one day.
What I've figured out so far:
1) Only .psd files get deleted and only by photoshop. Illustrator, Premiere, Indesign are unaffected.
2) Only files that are being saved on network (Buffalo) drive get deleted. Files saved on my macs hard disk have not gone lost so far.
3) It seems that when I use "Save As" the files save correctly. Only when using "Save" do they get deleted.
4) File getting deleted does not happen every time. But it does happen around 20-30% of the time when saving.
My current solution is to keep file browser open at all times. And every time I save file with Photoshop I check it's still there. If it's been deleted I will save it again with new name. As long as it's still open in Photoshop I can still save it.
Due to my work place, saving on the Buffalo is currently the only realistic solution. I realise this is not a Photoshop only problem. It has a lot to do with the network drive as well. How ever as Photoshop is the only program affected it seemed like a good idea to post it here as well. We've been in contact with Buffalo and they deny any knowledge about this problem, so we've hit a brickwall there anyway.
Has anyone else run into this or similar problem? Any suggestions besides taking more backups?

2) Only files that are being saved on network (Buffalo) drive get deleted.
There you have it – Adobe’s position with regard to Photoshop is: »Adobe Systems does not provide support for networks and removable media.«
http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/406/kb406793.html
http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/902/cpsid_90279.html
In case you are interested there are threads on this, for example
http://forums.adobe.com/message/4016082#4016082
One workaround might be to always do Save As’ as you claim those work; this could be automated with a Script for example.

Presets and defaults get deleted when InDesign CS3 crashes

Every few days InDesign CS3 crashes. I don't know why, but that's not even the issue here. The problem is that when it does, all of my presets and default settings get erased.
Is there anything I can do to keep this from happening?
If I save my default settings (by which I mean measurements, color palette, default fonts, stuff like that) as a workspace, will that allow me to import it all again when it does happen? Or will my workspaces get deleted too?
This is getting really really really frustrating and I'd appreciate any advice on the matter!
Shari+

Read through the prior threads Peter posted. I see no solution offered. I
too have had this problem on two separate workstations from the day ID CS3
was installed. Intermitant, but it can be made to happen quite easily. I
have never had a problem with printing, just opening multiple files through
explorer.
I spend hours on the phone with Adobe tech support and they also could not
resolve the issue. Tried everything under the sun, including activating only
the bare minimum fonts required by the systems, creating new XP user
accounts, reinstalling the suite, deleting prefs, washing some files through
INX, defrag, turning off all processes other than ID... nada... still
problems. They gave up. So did I. Just living with it waiting for the next
update.
If someone has a fix for this, I'm all ears.
Larry

SC Item getting deleted

Hi
I am displaying errors if there errors on SC Item fields from BADI Implementation. When SC Item contains errors and I click on Next Button, the Item is getting deleted.
Also when an Item is selected from catalog and that line appears on SC, the fields in Item Data tab are greyed out from making changes.
This is in SRM 7.0
Please help with your suggestions.

Dear Poster,
As no response has been provided to the thread in some time I must assume the issue is resolved, if the question is still valid please create a new thread rephrasing the query and providing as much data as possible to promote response from the community.
Best Regards,
SDN SRM Moderation Team

When I delete a iMessage from a conversation, does it get deleted from the recipients screen as well ?

When I delete a iMessage from a conversation, does it get deleted from the recipients screen as well ?

AppleMan001 wrote:
Please note this is an old thread.
I think that if they did this it could cause legal issues, such as offensive messages being deleted from the recipient before they have a chance to report the sender.
Yes, it's an old one, but I started to send texts to the wrong recipients recently, and the problem is still up to date !
Of course, I agree with you : there must be a legal justification.
But, just for the discussion, I mean, when someone insists and really wants you to know he hates you, you can mute him or even report him, make screen captures…
We are all responsible for what we say and do, but that doesn't mean we should have the ability to delete our mistakes. It's not like you can delete emails or phone calls or even physical mail.
Very often, and that's actually why I searched this thread, I send a message to someone else than the one I thought. That's life, I mean, this is not just about agressive people. I would appreciate to be able to recover my mistake, and to not bother the wrong recipient, cancel the message. Plus, it can be something confidential.
What is the meaning of a mistake if we don't have the chance to recover it ?
Even the law, includes this aspect : « Is it the first, second or third time he did this ? » — I don't know in the US, but in France it's the case (and we use same iPhones).
This is one of the radical aspects of Apple I dislike, and on this point particularly, I disagree with you, because, I think, a mistake should be recoverable.
If, for example, I send a very rude text to someone, and then realize it was too much, I want to be able to delete it, because I changed my mind.
But if I consider it normal (maybe I should not) then the recipient will still be able to report me.
That's my opinion, and just wanted to share it. A mistake should be recoverable.
Hope my english is not too bad,
Best regards,
Francois

HT201269 I am trying to save memory on my iPhone 4S/ ios6. Can I back up all photos to icloud and the external hard disk I normally use for photos? If I then delete photos from the iPhone do the get deleted on iCloud?

I am trying to save memory on my iPhone 4S/ ios6.
1) Can I back up all photos to icloud and the external hard disk I normally use for photos? If I then delete photos from the iPhone do the get deleted on iCloud?
2) Can I back up the newsstand to iCloud and save memory on the iPhone?
3) Can I back up the bookshelf to icloud and save memory on the iPhone?

1. What format is the external drive? It sounds like it's ina format that Macs can't write to. Is it a NAS or NTFS?
2. Easiest thing: just move your iPhoto Library to the external
Make sure the drive is formatted Mac OS Extended (Journaled)
1. Quit iPhoto
2. Copy the iPhoto Library from your Pictures Folder to the External Disk.
3. Hold down the option (or alt) key while launching iPhoto. From the resulting menu select 'Choose Library' and navigate to the new location. From that point on this will be the default location of your library.
4. Test the library and when you're sure all is well, trash the one on your internal HD to free up space.
Regards
TD

Order category BF not getting deleted in APO

Hi Experts,
I have a situation where the material is already deleted in ECC (hence no longer existing), but the product is existing in APO and we need to delete this in APO. To do this, we need to delete the dependent orders for that product/location first and then other dependencies.
There are few orders for the prod/loc as confirmed purchase orders (ord cat BF). These orders are now PP/DS orders with status as PP firmed, output firmed and date fixed.
I have tried the two programs- /sapapo/rlcdelete and /sapapo/delete_pp_order, but system is not picking up the orders to delete.
The system shows as message as " No deletion of converted orders in active version"
As I said earlier, the product is no longer existing in ECC, hence I can not delete the orders from there.
Is there any other way to achieve this? Is there any BADI to do this in APO?
Regards
Manotosh

Hi
You can use /SAPAPO/DELETE_PP_ORDER report for deleting these orders.
Execute the this report, mention all the products for which you want to delete the order and execute it. It might give the message as orders will not get deleted as inactive in APO.
Go back please enter as DEL_EXECU, in the place where we use to enter the T-codes and enter and than again execute the report. It will delete the orders.
You can also try /SAPAPO/SDORDER_DEL report.
Thanks
Amol

Past due PurRqs are getting deleted in APO but not getting deletd in R3

Hi folks,
We have a daily job, which runs at 18:00 hrs in the evening everyday in the APO Production System.The job is to delete all past due Purchase Requisitions for last 2 years (job & variant details are mentioned below) All the past due PurRqs are getting deleted from APO, which we have cross-cheked in RRP3 view many times.
However the same is not getting deleted in R3 systems. The planner/end- user is getting confused & hassled by this list of old PurRqs which is visible in R3 through MD04 t-code.
Please suggest remedial/corrective actions to get this issue sorted.
The job details for the deletion of past purchase requisitions.
The job is run with the following variant details:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ABAP Program name :/SAPAPO/RLCDELETE
VARIANT Details
Select Object-> By Categories ->Category = AG (PurRqs in R3)
Manual Selection-> Version =000; Product = (blank); Location = List ofall locations;
Fixed Order (ticked)
Period = 14.03.2009 to 14.03.2011 {All PurRqs in these period shouldget deleted in APO as well as R3}
Settings-> Delete Transaction Data ->In R3 & APO (ticked)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Past due PurRqs are not getting deleted in R3 systems. The planner/end-user is getting confused & hassled resulting in loss of productive time & generation of erroneous planning which is negatively impacting Business.
Pls suggest some remedy for this.
MMTIA
Kumar
Edited by: Blue Lotus on Mar 14, 2011 5:51 PM

Do you run the CCR on a daily basis. If so do you see the "reqs missing in R/3" in the CCR ?
Also what is your transfer setting ? Meaning the transfer from APO to R/3 configuration - is it immediate or change pointer based ? check that also
Thanks
Aparna

Message log is not getting deleted in WEBUI (BADI ORDER_SAVE)

Hi,
I am displaying an error message based on certain conditions in BADI: ORDER_SAVE (CHECK_BEFORE_SAVE). On getting error, I am correcting that error.
Using CRM_MESSAGE_DELETE, I am deleting error message before displaying new error message. However, my error log is not going away. It is still displaying in the log in WEBUI.
Could you please help me out, how can I delete error message, and error log from WEBUI.
Thanks,
Sandeep

I have the same question as you .
   I have use folleing code to display message in web ui:
      if (conditions).
      CV_OWN_MESSAGE = 'X'.
      MESSAGE '商机描述已经存在，请修改后再保存！' type 'E' RAISING DO_NOT_SAVE .
    endif.
but when i have edit the description , the Message log is not getting deleted in WEBUI .
who can tell me , thanks for all your help !

Open TRs not getting deleted after TECO production order

Hi,
We're having an issue. We're using WMPP interface to supply the production line for the production orders. The auto TRs are generated when the production orders are released.
After TECO the production orders, the open TRs are not getting deleted automatically.
Could anyone know if these TRs get deleted automatically when we do the TECO production order?
If yes, do we have any restriction or condition based on this, the TRs get deleted?
Please explain.
Thank you.
with regards,
Muthu.

Hi Abhijit,
Thank you for your reply. It does not help me.
The auto TR creation is happening now as required. No issue on this.
When you do the TECO, it also cancels the TRs. I tested this also.
There're some scenario this open TRs cancellation is not happening. I do not know when these open TRs are not cancelled. If you know answer for this, please let me know.
Thank you for your help and time.
with regards,
Muthu.

Production Reporting out put not getting deleted after 30mins what we set.

Hi,
This issue regarding Production Reporting. In the workspace the report output not getting deleted after 30minutes (while publishing the report settings were like delete after 30 mins). Any suggestions please .....
Thanks
Venkat

Hi Deepak,
Please chek the field / value which u have changed is relavant to printouts of the change.
You can check with following path
SPRO> MM > Purchasing > Message > Fields Relevant to Printouts of Changes.
Confirm tick is provided for PO ( P)
Vivek

I have had my iPhone 4 for a year and have only plugged it into my friends computer when I first got it, and now I just purchase my music right on my phone, so now I'm getting a new phone so if I plug it into my comp will anythin get deleted?

I have had my iPhone 4 for a year and have only plugged it into my friends computer when I first got it, and now I just purchase my music right on my phone, so now I'm getting a new phone and want to back up my music, photos, etc so if I plug this phone into my computer will anything get deleted off my phone?

See Here:
IOS Sync Content to Computer
http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1296
And have a Look here Before you do Anything...
http://www.apple.com/support/iphone/getstarted/
This might be Useful:
iPhone User Guide
http://manuals.info.apple.com/en_US/iphone_user_guide.pdf

Threads Getting Deleted

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for