Time System Advanced Problem Unresolved

Please see the link for a couple of screen shots. I need to know what the alarm is and why it is happenning.
https://homepage.usask.ca/~nmz027/
Background:
I am running Lookout 6.02, which is connected to a Modicon 984 plc. They are linked by a modbus connection.
Problem:
Randomly,
I receive an error in Lookout " System time advanced 03:34:43.532 from
5/10/07 15:42:57 to 05/10/07 07:05:06." During this time Lookout is not
recording any information (trend screens are blank). At the same time
there is a "No communication response from Modbus secondary" alarm.
Does anyone know what is causing the problem?
Some questions I have answered about this problem already:
Do you programmatically change the Lookout system time in your process? (No)
Do you set any Time Servers for your process? (No)
Perhaps it's also because of the Daylight Saving Time. (It is on
but the clock does not automatically update. Plus this should only
cause a problem twice a year, not 5 times a week).
Message Edited by Squire66 on 06-12-2007 01:39 PM

Well it appears that a similar problem exists in ver 6.1. I don't get any alarm or error but the logged data is incorrectly time stamped which makes the hypertrend useless. I can see the Lookout time (lower left of screens) jump ahead 1 hr 11 sec. for a short duration (1-2 minutes) and then return to normal. I've seen it happen twice in succession for a total of 2 min 22 secs. and a few times directly to 2 hrs 22 secs ahead. Problem occurs more than once an hour.
Lookout 6.1 plus latest published patch
CPU is genuine Intel
OS Windows 2000 SP 4
W2K Daylight savings time patch applied.
Bob
Message Edited by Bob_L on 05-06-2008 08:22 PM

Similar Messages

Just download lightroom cc and not open at all. Have desistarei and will install several times and the problem continues ... I need a solution .. thank you Operating System Windows 7 64bit

just download lightroom cc and not open at all. Have desistarei and will install several times and the problem continues ... I need a solution .. thank you Operating System Windows 7 64bit

Try the following user tip:
Troubleshooting issues with iTunes for Windows updates

I have just installed Lion OS and Face Time encounters server problems on sign up. I have sought the firewall problem without success and even temporarily turned off firewall with no success.

I have just installed Lion OS and Face Time encounters server problems on sign up. I have sought to rectify the firewall problem without success and even temporarily turned off firewall with no success. Any ideas?

Some folks have discovered that changing their DNS service fixes FaceTime connection issues.
The ideal way is to configure your modem/router with DNS service, but often settings in System Preferences/Network/Advanced/DNS on your Mac will override the router settings. Try either of these;
OpenDNS
208.67.222.222, 208.67.220.220
Google Public DNS
8.8.8.8, 8.8.4.4

Time machine backup problem with upgrade to Lion - Choose Backup Disk button non-existant

Hi, I just upgraded my mac mini to Lion and have encountered a problem with by Time Machine. It no longer sees my networked drive for back up. So, I followed the instructions on this site http://code.stephenmorley.org/articles/time-machine-on-a-network-drive/ and get to item 6b. and have a problem I have not been able to sort out. Instead of the button "Choose Backup Disk" on the Time Machine window, I have a button "Select Disk" with a button "Options" under it. When I click "Select Disk" I get a window promtping me to "Set Up Other Time Capsule" and clicking that takes me to a window for AirPort Utility. (screen shot )
Anyone know why I don't have the right button for starters and why I can't access any drives on my machine at all? I followed the web instructions on the site I mention above because initially I had an error about AFP, so suspected the drive set up here (it is my work) is incompatible.
(The only IT guy we have is on vacation for 2 weeks and then I am on vacation for 2 weeks and can't wait a month in order to back up! Thought I would try here to see if I can get answers before I am away.)
Thanks in advance!

i had a similar problem when I first installed Lion last year. It seems that some network NAS products need a firmware update to work with Lion. I contacted the manufacturer and they helped me out. I am using a Synology NAS system. Problem solved after firmware update.

System copy problem...No transfer rules available

Hi ,
We are facing a problem in getting the Transfer Rules...
1.we did a system copy from PRD system and created a Sandbox system .
2.After the system copy the problem came from the source system.....i.e for the datasource's in the table RSOLTPSOURCE the mapping is showing for 2 systems....CRM PRD system & CRM SANDBOX system....
3.Coz of this issue the Transfer rules are not available and the all the DS are inactive......
4.I tried with the FM RS_TRANSTRUC_ACTIVATE_ALL but im getting message as no transfer structure is available.
5.When i tried to manually activate the DS from BW side it is asking to create TRANSFER RULE.
Please help me to sort it out.....
Thanks in Advance
BASKAR

HI ,
I also raised a OSS to SAP ....what they suggested is....
According the logs in BWS there was definitely a systemcopy from BWP to BWS, but the BDLS logs looks very strange, which actually did not converted anything, because the administration tables containing some very strange entries.
Lets take the datasource 0crm_sales_act_1 for example. If you check this datasource in table RSOLTPSOURCE you can see, that it exists currently for both source systems:
OLTPSOURCE LOGSYS OBJVERS
0CRM_SALES_ACT_1 CMPCLNT501 A
0CRM_SALES_ACT_1 CMSCLNT501 A
Unfortunately the root cause of this is unkown, but most probably it is caused by an improper copy procedure, where the consulting note
886102 was not followed.
To solve the problem, please follow the below steps:
1. Implement note 1405233 and 1336119 to your system 2. Go to RSA1 and delete the source System CMS.
3. With function module rsar_logical_system_delete delete the source system CMP:
I_LOGSYS CMPCLNT501
I_FORCE_DELETE X
I_NO_TRANSPORT X
I_NO_AUTHORITY X
4. In your productive BW (BWP) please create a transport request which contains all the source system dependent objects for CMP. Please check note 886102 scenario B3 step 2 for details.
5. In BWS, please recreate the source system to CMS and activate it but please do not replicate the datasources yet.
6. In BWS please maintain the table RSLOGSYSMAP and map CMP to CMS and import the transport request created in step 4.
Please be aware, that such a constellation happens mostly, if some steps are missed or are not carried out properly from consulting note 886102. Please get in touch with your basis colleagues and provide them this note, so the next time such a problem does not occur.
I hope this helps to solve the problem.
Thanks
BASKAR

Troubleshooting System Recovery Problems

A System Recovery is a useful tool to return your Windows 8 tablet back to factory defaults. However, what do you do when the System Recovery isn't working!?
A full System Recovery can be a lengthy process as there is a lot of data being transferred. Patience is the key, as a full Recovery can take two to four hours to complete.
For more information check out HP's Troubleshooting HP System Recovery Problems for Windows 8. This document will help you get your Windows 8 tablet back up and running.
TIP: If you are planning on using the System Recovery make sure that you do not change or delete the HP Recovery Partition as that will make all but impossible to Restore your tablet using the HP Recovery Manager.
Please click “Accept as Solution ” if you feel my post solved your issue.
Click the “Kudos Thumbs Up" on the right to say “Thanks” for helping!
Thank you,
BHK6
I work on behalf of HP

Have you created this disc on your own or you use original toshiba disc?
Do you use it for the first time?

Error -1074384569; NI-XNET: (Hex 0xBFF63147) The database information on the real-time system has been created with an older NI-XNET version. This version is no longer supported. To correct this error, re-deploy your database to the real-time system.

Hello
I have a VeriStand-Project (VSP) created with my Laptop-Host (LTH) which works with my PXI, while
deploying it from my LTH. Then I have installed the whole NI enviroment for PXI and VeriStand use on a
industrial PC (iPC). I have tried to deploy my VSP from the iPC to the PXI but the following error
message arose on my iPC:
The VeriStand Gateway encountered an error while deploying the System Definition file.
Details: Error -1074384569 occurred at Project Window.lvlibroject Window.vi >> Project
Window.lvlib:Command Loop.vi >> NI_VS Workspace ExecutionAPI.lvlib:NI VeriStand - Connect to System.vi
Possible reason(s):
NI-XNET: (Hex 0xBFF63147) The database information on the real-time system has been created with an
older NI-XNET version. This version is no longer supported. To correct this error, re-deploy your
database to the real-time system. ========================= NI VeriStand: NI VeriStand
Engine.lvlib:VeriStand Engine Wrapper (RT).vi >> NI VeriStand Engine.lvlib:VeriStand Engine.vi >> NI
VeriStand Engine.lvlib:VeriStand Engine State Machine.vi >> NI VeriStand Engine.lvlib:Initialize
Inline Custom Devices.vi >> Custom Devices Storage.lvlib:Initialize Device (HW Interface).vi
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * • Unloading System
Definition file... • Connection with target Controller has been lost.
The software versions of the NI products (MAX/My System/Software) between my LTH and the iPC are
almost the same. The only differences are:
1. LabView Run-Time 2009 SP1 (64-bit); is installed on LTH but missing on iPC. The iPC has a 32-bit system.
2. LabView Run-Time 2012 f3; is installed on LTH but missing on iPC.
3. NI-DAQmx ADE Support 9.3.5; something strage on the LTH, because normally I am using NI-DAQmx 9.5.5 and all other DAQmx products on my LTH are 9.5.5. That means NI-DAQmx Device Driver 9.5.5 and NI-DAQmx Configuration 9.5.5.. On the iPC side all three products are 9.5.5.. That means NI-DAQmx ADE Support 9.5.5, NI-DAQmx Device Driver 9.5.5 and NI-DAQmx Configuration 9.5.5..
4. Traditional NI-DAQ 7.4.4; The iPC has this SW installed. On the LTH this SW is missing.
In order to fix this problem I have formatted my PXI and I have installed the following SW from the iPC:
1. LabVIEW Real-Time 11.0.1
2. NI-488.2 RT 3.0.0
3. NI_CAN 2.7.3
Unfortunately the above stated problem still arose.
What can I do to fix this problem?
I found a hint on http://www.labviewforum.de/Thread-XNET-CAN-die-ersten-Gehversuche.
There it is written to deploy the dbc file againt.
If this is a good hint, so how do I deploy a dbc file?
I would feel very pleased if somebody could help me! :-)
Best regards
Lukas Nowak

Hi Lukas,
I think the problem is caused by differenet drivers for the CAN communication.
NI provides two driver for CAN: NI-CAN and NI-XNET.
NI-CAN is the outdated driver which is not longer used by new hardware. NI replaced the NI-CAN driver with NI-XNET some years ago, which supports CAN, LIN and the FLEXRAY communication protocol.
You wrote:
In order to fix this problem I have formatted my PXI and I have installed the following SW from the iPC:
3. NI_CAN 2.7.3
NI CAN is the outdated driver. I think that you should try to install NI-XNET instead of NI-CAN on your PXI-System, to get rid of the error message.
Regards, stephan

I have an iMac mid 2010. After Disk utilities said the drive was corrupt, I ran the hardware test (extended) 3 times. No problems. I than ran Disk utility again and got 2 messages in red-keys out of order, and --Volume corrupt, can't be repaired. I tried

I have an iMac mid 2010. After Disk utilities said the drive was corrupt, I ran the hardware test (extended) 3 times. No problems. I than ran Disk utility again and got 2 messages in red…keys out of order, and ……Volume corrupt, can't be repaired.
I tried to do a system install, but message said…disk can't be changed. Will a complete erase and install fix this ?
Everything is backed-up.

There's hardware and software.
Your drive could physically be in good condition but something has caused the file structure to be messed up (it just happens sometimes). The directory that keep track of files is corrupt. Disk Utility can help determine if that is the issue. In some cases it can repair the problem but it cannot do it to a drive that is being used to boot the system while you are doing that. You have to boot from another drive. Some things DU cannot repair and you need to try a stronger utility such as Diskwarrior.
A failing hard drive (one with mechanical issues) can be a cause of file structure issues but this is by no means always the case. Apart from looking at the SMART diagnosis feature of Disk Utility (and smart isn't totally reliable) there often isn't a way to tell if a drive is failing until it suddenly happens, which is why you need to maintain backups.
In your situation it does sound serious and not just minor directory corruption. You can try erasing (formatting) the drive, You may need to do this if it is really corrupt, in which case there could be underlying physical issues. I use old technology but if you have the patience you can try erasing the drive with the security option of writing zeros once (don't do more unless you are going on a 3 week vacation). This makes the drive not simply assume everything is okay by forcing it try every part of the drive by writing data. If something is gong wrong you may find it marks a lot of bad sectors, or flat out refuses to format. Then you know you need a new drive.

TDS DEDUCTING TWICE AT THE TIME OF ADVANCE POSTING AND AT THE TIME OF INVOg

HI ALL
I HAVE AN ISSUE TDS DEDUCTING TWICE AT THE TIME OF ADVANCE POSTING AND AT THE TIME OF INVOICE POSTING
AT THE TIME OF ADVANCE POSTING F-48
ENTRY IS
VENDOR     DR     30000
BANK          CR     2900
TDS          CR     300
AT THE TIME OF INVOICE POSTING-FB60
THE ENTRY IS
EXPENSE     DR     30000
VENDOR     CR     29700
TDS          CR     300
SO TDS HAS BEEN DEDUCTED TWO TIMES
AT THE TIME OF DOWN PAYMENT CLEARING u2013F-54
THE INVOICE ENTRY SHOULD BE REVERSED AS
VENDOR     DR     29700
TDS          DR     300
VENDOR SPL CR      30000
BUT IT IS NOT REVERSING WHILE CLEARING DOWN PAYMENT AT F-54
FOR THIS I MADE THE CONFIGURATION FOR DOWN PAYMENT IN WITH HOLDING TAX TYPE FOR PAYMENT.HERE I ACTIVATED u201CCENTRAL INVOICE PROu201D
THOUGH IT IS NOT REVERSING THE ENTRY OF INVOICE POSTING AT THE TIME OF DOWN PAYMENT CLEARING AT F-54.
SO WHAT COULD BE THE PROBLE . IF YOU KNOW PLEASE TELL ME THE SOLUTION
I WILL BE GREATE THANKS TO YOU
REGARDS
RAM

Hi All
I Have an issue with TDS.
At the time of down payment clearing th invoice amount is not reversing..what are the settings I need to check
Actually
At the time of Advance Posting the entry is----
VENDOR     DR     30000
BANK          CR     2900
TDS          CR     300
At the time of Invoice Posting theentry is -
EXPENSE     DR     30000
VENDOR     CR     29700
TDS          CR     300
At the time of Down Payment Clearing in t code F-54 the invoice entry should be reversed as -
VENDOR     DR     29700
TDS          DR     300
VENDOR SPL CR      30000
But system not reversing while clearing down payment in t code F-54 and the system posting entry is as----
VENDOR DR 30000
VENDOR SPL   30000
So what is the mistaken has been done by me .If you any idea please let me know. I will be thankful to you.
Thanks&Regards
Ram

How to get the SubVI(the virtual path is under .exe) reference in Run Time System

Hi everyone
The problem is about how to get the SubVI reference in Run Time System, when the SubVI is in .exe after building.
More details:
The top vi calls the SubVI by dynamic way, so the SubVI is included always, and the source object is the application.exe.
After the setup above, the SubVI will be in the application.exe. For example, SubVI's path is ...\application.exe\SubVI.vi
So, how to get SubVI's reference in Run Time System?
I can not get it when using "open VI reference" with the path ...\application.exe\SubVI.vi in Run Time System.
Actually, I can create a file to include the SubVI, instead of build the SubVI in application.exe , then I can get the reference convenintly. But it is not my favourate way.
Thanks
chenyin
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Here is the problem. Call a dynamic subVI means users could change it but it's also very attractive.
The dynamic call must be used within a user mastered but some parade can avoid problems.
It depends of why you use dynamic calls... => 2 main ways:
- Dynamic call are use to maintain an evolutive part of the code without acting on the executable => one unique VI distribution maintained by the administrator/developer
- Dynamic call are use to provide a collection of 'external' feature which could be enriched by the administrator/developer. For example, you provide to your customer a set of custom signal filters selectable in the executable.
In the 2 cases, you are only able to assess user skills to know if there is a risk of damage if there is modification.
So, to stay alone master a parade could be to provide dynamic VI without diagram but with the problem of maintenance because no modification in situ and more attention to manage distribution.
An other way is to hide the real distribution to user => call dynamic VI but unnamed it as *.vi but other (a repulsive name as OS system name ) or simply with no extension in order to not attract user... but it's questionable...
Another method more difficult but safer is to create a test of consistency ahead of your routine (version, user, modification date, ...)

Java Real-Time System HotSpot(TM) Client VM warning: unable to lock pages i

Error:
Java Real-Time System HotSpot(TM) Client VM warning: unable to lock pages into memory
I'm getting this error, although I have assigned all the needed privilegs to root and I am logged in as root. I have done everything described in the guidelines to get the privilegs, but still this warning occurs.
But my application still works completely with no appreciable differences.
So my question is: Does this warning affect the performance of my application?? Or can I live with this warning?
Gordon

Determinism is an important issue in my application. That's why page locking should be active in my application. When I'm determining the ScopedMemory size via VM like:
... -XX:ScopedSize=500000000 ...Then page locking works with a size of 500 mb very well. But when I try to set the ScopedSize value to 1 gb, then the exception (unable to lock page...) is thrown. So it seems as if I had all the required rights, but the huge size is not supported.
The System has about 6 gb of DDR2Ram and minimum 5 gb are free during starting the VM. So are there any other parameters except ScopedSize that I can change, to allow the VM to lock memory with a size of about 1 gb? Or where is the problem with locking such big sizes?
Thanks,
Gordon

Where to find Java Real-Time System Evaluation

Hello,
I tried to download an evaluation version of the Java Real-Time System from this page: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/tech/rts-142899.html
But, when i try to download the "Java RTS 2.2 - Academic Developer Use" for Linux x86 32bit, i get the following message: "The Java Real-Time System evaluation program is closed at this time."
Is the evaluation program expired? Where could i find an evaluation version of JRTS?
Thank you all for your attention,
Greetings.
Andrea

Determinism is an important issue in my application. That's why page locking should be active in my application. When I'm determining the ScopedMemory size via VM like:
... -XX:ScopedSize=500000000 ...Then page locking works with a size of 500 mb very well. But when I try to set the ScopedSize value to 1 gb, then the exception (unable to lock page...) is thrown. So it seems as if I had all the required rights, but the huge size is not supported.
The System has about 6 gb of DDR2Ram and minimum 5 gb are free during starting the VM. So are there any other parameters except ScopedSize that I can change, to allow the VM to lock memory with a size of about 1 gb? Or where is the problem with locking such big sizes?
Thanks,
Gordon

SetAsyncTimerAttribute ASYNC_ATTR_INTERVAL fails to reset timer on Real-time system

The interval timer does not get reset when using a timer created in a real-time program (PXI chassis using NewAsyncTimerWithPriority). It works correctly on a non real-time system (Windows 7 Laptop using NewAsyncTimer).
Example of problem:
timer is set to 20 seconds (NewAsyncTimerWithPriority)
wait 15 seconds
timer interval is set to 30 seconds (SetAsyncTimerAttribute ASYNC_ATTR_INTERVAL)
timer fires 5 seconds later instead of 30 seconds
GetAsyncTimerAttribute returns the correct value as if it worked properly. Note that the timer fires every 30 seconds after the early firing in step 4. It appears that changing the interval on a real-time system does not reset the timer as stated in the help file "If the timer has already started, setting ASYNC_ATTR_INTERVAL resets the timer."
Am I doing something wrong? Has anyone seen this problem?
Using: LabWindows/CVI 2012, Real-time module 2012.
Also installed: LabView 2012, Real-time module 2012, FPGA module 2012.
Thanks.

Hi Moxcoak,
You are right this is a known issue, the async timer does not reset properly in a RT system from CVI. We have already filed a bug report on it (#387902) and I will add your service request to that corrective action report to hopefully push it to be resolved faster. Meanwhile, I will try to find the best workaround for you. One option is to set a flag with the communication thread and check it with another asynchronous thread. I will get back to you with the details on how to implement that, but it would depend on your setup.
Regards,
Basil Beirouti
Applications Engineering
National Instruments
Regards,
Basil
Applications Engineering
National Instruments

Judging System Performance ... (was System Overload Problem...)

In a previous thread (was System Overload Problem...) ... I encountered system overload errors as described, while the system performance monitor showed almost no usage for either the disk I/O or the audio monitors.
I was just using some audio Instruments and a few plug-in's ( as was listed in the previous thread) ...
Question: So, and I missing something, or - how can we actually judge the system performance related to actual CPU usage? It seems as though there should be a third column ...
- 1 for disk I/O
- 1 for audio
- 1 for CPU
I would appreciate any insights on this matter.

If you do a search for '10010' (also other 1001x errors) or 'error' you'll find plenty of threads of people with the same errors without good reason for the error's description-sometimes it is a driver conflict but the error returned is system overload. These errors are not always indicative of what actually caused the problem.
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=765043&#765043
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=766671&#766671
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=762124&#762124
And there are many little prefs, processes or actions which may trigger it. Many of them go unresolved.

Hello, I am trying to reinstall os x lion in my macbook pro mid 2012, from my recovery disc, and its imposible because every time I have problems to download de installer or something that is required to do that. what can I do?

hello, I am trying to reinstall os x lion in my macbook pro mid 2012, from my recovery disc, and its imposible because every time I have problems to download de installer or something that is required to do that. what can I do?

When you do get it downloaded, before you do anything else, save the Lion installer - make a copy and put it somewhere safe. you can then reuse, make a clean install and other things.
OS X Lion Install to Different Drive
How to create an OS X Lion installation disc MacFixIt
Migration Assistant Update for Mac OS X Snow Leopard
http://www.apple.com/support/lion/installrecovery/
Create an OS X Lion Install disc
http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-13727_7-20080989-263/how-to-create-an-os-x-lion-ins tallation-disc
How to clone your system:
http://macperformanceguide.com/Mac-HowToClone-backup.html
http://macperformanceguide.com/Mac-HowToClone.html
http://www.macupdate.com/app/mac/7032/carbon-copy-cloner
http://www.macperformanceguide.com/blog/2012/20120711_2-MacPro-internal-clone-ba ckup.html
Yes I strongly recommend making a clone you can boot from in addition to use TimeMachine.
Carbon Copy Cloner will also offer to copy and make a Recovery partition on the 2nd drive.

Time System Advanced Problem Unresolved

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for