Timestamp difference

hi all
how to find the timestampdiff function
can any one give me the syntax
Thanks
Sreedhar

hi Sreedhar,
Try in google before posting in forums
My Google results for you
You can use TimestampDiff to get the date difference.
Here is the syntax:
TimestampDiff(interval, timestamp1, timestamp2)
Where:
-- > interval = The specified interval.
Valid values are:
SQL_TSI_SECOND,
SQL_TSI_MINUTE,
SQL_TSI_HOUR,
SQL_TSI_DAY,
SQL_TSI_WEEK,
SQL_TSI_MONTH,
SQL_TSI_QUARTER,
SQL_TSI_YEAR.
thanks,
Saichand.v

Similar Messages

Timestamp Difference Excluding the weekends

Hi,
I need to find the Timestamp difference from Monday to Friday by Excluding the Weekends..
At present I am using the Timestamp diff function to find difference but let me know how to exclude the weekends from the calculation..
Is there any function to exclude.. Please help me..

Hi,
There is no direct function available in OBIEE to exclude weekends (SAT and SUN) while you do a day difference calculation.
In order to achieve this, there are two ways...
1. Create a complex join with W_DAY_D table with the condition W_DAY_D.DAY_DT in between OPEN_DATE and ifnull(CLOSE_DATE, current_date) and W_DAY_D.DAY_OF_WEEK not in (1, 7). This will give you all the records from W_DAY_D between OPEN_DT and CLOSE_DT excluding Saturday and Sunday. Then you can create a metric in BMM layer to count the ROW_WID from W_DAY_D table. The count gives you the desired value.
2. Move the OPEN_DT and CLOSE_DT to the Friday by adding the desired number of days using TimeStampAdd and DayOfWeek function. Calculate the day difference between OPEN_DT and CLOSE_DT(say X) and calculate the week difference after modifying the dates to friday (say Y). Now X-2*Y is going to give you the desired value.
Hope this helps.
Thanks,
Santosh

Timestamp difference issue

Hi,
I get blank result when I select a difference between 2 timestamps with one or more aggreagate function.
example :
create table EHTest (colA timestamp(3));
insert into EHTest (colA) values (sysdate) x 5
select min (colA), max (colA), min (colA) - max (colA) from EHTest
result :
27-JUN-06 12.07.31.000000000 PM 27-JUN-06 12.07.41.000000000 PM ' '
select sysdate - max(colA) from EHTest
result :
DB = 9.2.0.6
SQL developer version 1557
Thanks,
Regards
Eric Henrard

A late response and not from the SQL Developer team, but I tried this in SQL*Plus, and I got the following results for the queries:
select min (colA), max (colA), min (colA) - max (colA) from EHTest;
06-JUL-06 12.57.22.000 PM 06-JUL-06 12.58.01.000 PM -000000000 00:00:39.000
select sysdate - max(colA) from EHTest;
+000000000 00:04:46.000
I would guess that this is a problem with how SQL Developer is displaying interval values, because unlike date/datetime arithmetic (which returns number values for these types of expressions), timestamp arithmetic returns interval values (of INTERVAL DAY TO SECOND by default).
If I try the following query (which returns 1 day as an interval value):
select ( sysdate - ( sysdate - 1) ) day to second from dual;
I get +000000001 00:00:00 in SQL*Plus and blank in SQL Developer.

Watch out for timestamp differences, will produce Bridge / xmp problems!

Hi all,
Setup: CS5, Win 7 32b, Canon EOS600D.
I forgot to change the camera's internal date/time from
summer time to winter time. Because of this, Bridge
would not accept and show changes made in ACR
(not until one hour had passed!).
It turned out that what timestamp a photo will receive
depends on if you download the photo using
Bridge / Photo Downloader or EOS Utility:
Computer time: 14:31.
Camera time: 15.25.
Time stamps from Bridge download:
created 14:31, modified 15:25, taken 15.25
Time stamps from EOS Utility download:
created 15:25, modified 14:31, taken 15:25.
Using the workflow Bridge -> Photo Downloader.
Bridge -> ACR | make a crop | click Done
-> Back to Bridge, the Bridge thumbnail would not
show the cropped photo, just the original, uncropped one.
Using the workflow EOS Utility -> Fetch ->
Bridge -> ACR | make a crop | click Done
-> Back to Bridge, the Bridge thumbnail will show the
cropped photo as intended.
Since the Bridge workflow had a modified time that was
one hour ahead, it would take one hour before
any ACR changes would be reflected in any
Bridge thumbnail.
So: which time stamp is "correct"?
The created/modified from EOS Utility
or the modified/created from Bridge download?
The one which makes me able to see ACR changes in
Bridge thumbnails at once, of course -- i.e. in my opinion,
EOS Utility behaves correctly.
Or are there any differing opinions?

In Bridge, "Date Created" is the date the Photograph was taken: i.e the date recorded by your camera and stored within the file. "Date File Created" is the date when you created the file on disc, that is the date/time when you downloaded the picture from your camera.
So when the date the picture is modified is an hour before the time the picture was taken I can see the confusion in Bridge. Just looking at it as numbers, it is not possible to change something that has not been created yet. That is what Bridge is saying.

Timestamp: difference between these two time ?

hello all, how can I calculate the difference between these two time acquired as strings?
Thanks
Attachments:
Difference.jpg ‏59 KB

Hi duglia,
one way:
Best regards,
GerdW
CLAD, using 2009SP1 + LV2011SP1 + LV2014SP1 on WinXP+Win7+cRIO
Kudos are welcome

TIMESTAMP difference issues

I am trying to offset a timestamp column value by 6 hours some how the milli seconds is getting dropped off.
select to_timestamp ('04/15/2008 07:17:20:485749','MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS:FF') - 6/24 from dual
Output is 4/14/2008 1:17:20AM
but I am expecting Output as 4/14/2008 1:17:20:485749 AM

OrionNet wrote:
Hello,
Is this works for youIt will not. First of all, look at:
'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS.SSSSS'SSSSS is number of seconds past midnight. But most important, adding/subtracting number from a timestamp forces date arithmetic. As the result, timestamp is implicitly converted to date and fractional part of a second will be lost:
SQL> SELECT TO_CHAR (TO_TIMESTAMP ('04/15/2008 07:17:20:485749',
2                                'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS:FF'
3                  )
4                  - 6 / 24,
5                  'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS.FF'
6                  )
7 FROM DUAL
8 /
                'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS.FF'
ERROR at line 5:
ORA-01821: date format not recognized
SQL> SELECT TO_CHAR (TO_TIMESTAMP ('04/15/2008 07:17:20:485749',
2                                'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS:FF'
3                  )
4                  - 6 / 24,
5                  'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS'
6                  )
7 FROM DUAL
8 /
TO_CHAR(TO_TIMESTAM
04/15/2008 01:17:20
SQL> alter session set nls_timestamp_format='mm/dd/yyyy hh24:mi:ss.ff';
Session altered.
SQL> ALTER SESSION SET NLS_DATE_FORMAT='mm/dd/yyyy hh24:mi:ss';
Session altered.
SQL> SELECT TO_TIMESTAMP ('04/15/2008 07:17:20:485749',
2                'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS:FF'
3 )
4 - 6 / 24
5 FROM DUAL
6 /
TO_TIMESTAMP('04/15
04/15/2008 01:17:20
SQL> You need to use interval:
SQL> SELECT TO_TIMESTAMP ('04/15/2008 07:17:20:485749',
2                'MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS:FF'
3 )
4 - INTERVAL '6' HOUR
5 FROM DUAL
6 /
TO_TIMESTAMP('04/15/200807:17:20:485749','MM/DD/YYYYHH24:MI:SS:FF')-INTERVA
04/15/2008 01:17:20.485749000
SQL> SY.

Time differences

Hi all,
I am working out the difference between two timestamps and using SimpleDateFormat to turn it into the form "HH:mm:ss". It all works fine except for one bit. Say if i work out the difference between two times set 10 seconds apart i get an out: 01:00:10.
Where's that extra hour coming from? I know i could easily knock it all down by an hour but i want to know why it's doing it so i can sort something out.
I am simply subtracting the later time (both are long datatypes) from the older time, turning it into Date and using SimpleDateFormat.
Any ideas?
Thanks

steve_costin wrote:
I want to know how many seconds, minutes and hours elapsed between two dates (long datatypes).
ThanksYou could take the timestamp difference (in milliseconds) and do the math yourself. Or you could use a package like joda time:
http://joda-time.sourceforge.net/

After upgrade of OLTP, is there a report to tell me what needs replicated?

Hello,
We have just upgraded our OLTP system to ECC 6.0. Various steps of our process chains in BI are abending saying we need to replicate the datasource. Without replicating ALL datasources and activating ALL transfer rules, is there a way to know which individual ones need replicated/activated? I guess I'm looking for a report I can run that will tell me if I have anything in BI that will need to be replicated/activated due to timestamp differences.
Thanks,
Diane

Hi
Generally before Upgrading , we should maintain one Check list for the DS that are needed to be replicated . Now, you have to go and see the Process chain / Info Packages for the DS and make list of them and need to replicate, as there is no othergo to list the Ds to be replicated which is used in your project, just try with RSDS Table (Biside SE16) to have a basic idea which are the Ds you were updating before Upgrade.
Hope it helps and clear

Help on Threads in Java

I need some basic help in regards to threading in Java.
I have no history of writing threaded applications in any programming language.
I'm working on a kind of web bot, for a bunch of XML sources. There are 10's of thousands of sources and the timestamp difference between the lastest and last updated item is growing to almost a full day! This is not good enough really.
Here's the basic layout of the main class:
public class filer {
    private static class bot implements Runnable {
        private mysql db;
        private int botID;
        public bot(final int ID) {
            botID = ID;
            try {
                // Some prepared statements here...
            catch (SQLException ex) {System.exit(0);}
            catch (NoSuchAlgorithmException ex) {System.exit(0);}
        public void run() {
            db = new mysql("localhost", "xxx", "xxx", "xxx");
            if (db.connected == true) spider();
            else System.exit(0);
        final void spider() {
            // Spider logic here using botID...
            spider(); // Recursion...
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        for (int i = 0; i < 51; i++) (new Thread(new bot(i))).start();
}I'm trying to run 50 threads, each doing their task of downloading data, parsing it and inserting where applicable into the MySQL database. 50 should reduce difference in last and latest crawled to 1 hour, which would be great!
Am I missing something? Is there anything special that needs to be taken into consideration when using MySQL?
Any help much appreciated!

Wow, that's a bummer :-(
I managed to get this working, showing 50 simultaneous connections to MySQL, but the connections appear to be "sleeping" most of the time which leads me to believe it's the problem you're suggesting.
Thanks for the heads up, could save me a lot of headaches!

Required Policy for IIS6 Policy Agent

Hello,
I have configured the Policy Agent for MS IIS6 and created a Policy
to enable some users to access the website.
Unfortunately, until now all users get a "403 - Forbidden"-Message.
Users dissallowed by policy get the response immediatly, users
who should have access must wait about 2 Minutes before they
get the error.
When I try to login using a account without permission, this is logged
in the "amAgent"-Logfile:
<--------------->8-------------->8------------------->
2004-08-31 15:10:37.578 128 2912:1567ad8 RemoteLog: User e09mahj0 was denied access to http://erlm630a.ts.siemens.de:81/index.htm.
2004-08-31 15:10:37.593 Error 2912:1567ad8 PolicyAgent: do_redirect(): Error while calling am_web_get_redirect_url(): status = success
2004-08-31 15:10:37.593 Error 2912:1567ad8 PolicyAgent: do_redirect() WriteClient did not succeed: Attempted message = HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
<--------------->8-------------->8------------------->
and when using a account who should have access:
<--------------->8-------------->8------------------->
2004-08-31 15:24:20.218 Error 2912:153c360 PolicyEngine: am_policy_evaluate: InternalException in Service::update_policy with error message:Policy query failed. and code:16
2004-08-31 15:24:20.218 128 2912:153c360 RemoteLog: User amAdmin was denied access to http://erlm630a.ts.siemens.de:81/index.htm.
2004-08-31 15:24:20.234 Error 2912:153c360 PolicyAgent: do_redirect(): Error while calling am_web_get_redirect_url(): status = success
2004-08-31 15:24:20.234 Error 2912:153c360 PolicyAgent: do_redirect() WriteClient did not succeed: Attempted message = HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden
<--------------->8-------------->8------------------->
I have no idea what "PolicyEngine ... code 16 means".
Anyone can help?
Regards,
Juergen Maihoefner

I found that page yesterday, but the errors I'm recieving are well out of the range of errors listed on that page
2008-10-13 16:06:53.578 Error 3232:1c30580 PolicyAgent: do_redirect: Error while calling am_web_get_url_to_redirect(): status = invalid argument
2008-10-13 16:06:53.578 Error 3232:1c30580 PolicyAgent: do_redirect: WriteClient did not succeed: Attempted message = HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden Content-Length: 13 Content-Type: text/plain 403 Forbidden Also, there's no firewall between the agent and the server. In my setup, authorized users don't get this message, its only users who aren't authorized to access sharepoint (the server with the agent) who see the 403 page that's just a plaintext '403 Forbidden' message.
Probably the strangest thing about this issue is that when I look at the IIS log, it indicates a 401.5 error (which is correct, as the user should just be denied, not forbidden.
2008-10-13 20:06:44 W3SVC87257621 10.28.204.100 GET /default.aspx - 7000 - 10.28.204.100 Mozilla/5.0+(Windows;+U;+Windows+NT+5.2;+en-US;+rv:1.9.0.3)+Gecko/2008092417+Firefox/3.0.3 302 0 0
2008-10-13 20:06:53 W3SVC87257621 10.28.204.100 GET /default.aspx - 7000 dan.west 10.28.204.100 Mozilla/5.0+(Windows;+U;+Windows+NT+5.2;+en-US;+rv:1.9.0.3)+Gecko/2008092417+Firefox/3.0.3 401 5 0At the very least, it would be nice to know how the 401 is getting translated into the 403 error, and what would be involved in customizing the error page for this event so that it isn't simply a plaintext message.
Edit:
If you're noticing the timestamp difference of 4 hours, it seems there is a known bug with the w3c extended log file format (http://support.microsoft.com/kb/271196).
Edited by: westd on Oct 14, 2008 5:28 AM

Starting an hour ago, the Mac App Store says I need to download Lion 10.7.4 again. Anyone else?

I am currently running Mac OS 10.6.8 with all updates on a Mac Mini (3,1--the model with 5 USB ports). Previously, I purchased, downloaded, but did NOT install Lion 10.7.3. Yesterday, I successfully downloaded 10.7.4 via the Mac App Store, but as before I didn't install it (planning to do that this evening). However, starting about an hour ago, the Mac App Store indicates that Lion has been updated and that I should download 10.7.4 -- again, apparently. I'm using the same AppleID account (the only one I have). Anyone else have the same experience? Is there a 10.7.4 version 1.1? If so, nothing in the software description mentions it...

This answer sidesteps my question. I'm aware that I could have upgraded from 10.6.8 to my previously downloaded 10.7.3 and then updated to 10.7.4 using the smaller updaters (I would favor using the Combo). But since the 10.7.3 FileVault security issue directly applied to me, I wanted to upgrade straight to 10.7.4, where it was addressed. Also, since my internet connection is quite fast, taking 15 minutes to redownload all of it again was not a deal-breaker for me. Interestingly, the instance of 10.7.4 I downloaded last night is 25 bytes longer than the 10.7.4 I downloaded the day before. Performing a 'diff -ra' within 'Terminal' between the two instances of the 10.7.4 Installer app revealed that the changes are confined to a single file within: 'Install Mac OS X Lion.app/Contents/_MASReceipt/receipt', and that they look like timestamp differences, so I'm now guessing that the two instances are functionally identical...

Using nqcmd command to purge cache

Hi,
I'd like to ask a question,
in OBIEE11G, I need to use nqcmd command to purge cache,
in server I run below commond:
nqcmd -d coreapplication_OH1568635987 -u weblogic -p weblogic1 -s C:\purgecache.txt
in purgecache.txt is following command:
call sapurgeallcache()
it's ok in server,
now I want to run this command in other machine,like I want to use informatica to invoke this commant to purge cache in schedule time.
how to do it?
thank you in advance!

lets assume the column name is etl_end_time
Agents can be controlled using reports(analysis in 11g). There is a Condition tab while creating agents which can be used to control agents based on output of the report.
Lets say u create a dummy report. In that you are putting some dummy column. In the Edit formula dialog, use the TIMESTAMPDIFF function to compare your etl_end_time and current_time.
Lets say you are setting the TIMESTAMPDIFF function to return the difference in minutes. Then create a filter on this column with operator as greater than or equal to and value as say 1 minute( this is ur choice)
So this report will now return true when the difference between the time stamps is greater than 1 minute (which means it will become true 1 minute after the etl is over). Suppose you configure the agent to check the condition every 1 minute then at one point when the agent runs, this report will return true and agent is triggered
This agent will then call you purge command
You can of course add another filter to the dummy report as less than or equal to 5 minutes because the timestamp difference of the current time and the previous etl runs will also be greater than 1 minute ;) So to make sure only the latest etl end time is used you can add a second filter as just said.
Phew.. :) hope I made myself clear

Activation of transfer Rule not available: Help Sought

Hi All,
I have encountered error in loading data due to
dataSource not having the same status as the source system in the Business Information Warehouse. There is a timestamp difference. The recommended solution in HELP was to replicate the datasource again and activate the transfer rules.... I have done the prescribed replication but have not been succesful in activating the transfer rules. The activate button is disabled. I tried to delete the transfer rule and assigned it again. But still the activate button is disabled?
Thanks! Hope you can help ASAP.
Philips

Hi,
Replicate the datasource first. Then once you are done with that. Run the program RS_TRANSTRU_ACTIVATE_ALL in SE38. You will get a selection screen . Give the Source system name and the infosource name execute. This would activate your transfer rule. We use this in the production enviornment.

Deploy Task Sequence to Unknown Computers fails

Hi everyone,
I am experiencing some problems regarding running a task sequence for unknown computers.
When I boot certain computers from PXE, I will receive an abortpxe.com
I have verified the following in my environment:
No duplicate "SMBIOS GUID" in my environment
No duplicate "MAC-addresses" in my enviroment
x64 & x86 unkown computer is located in collection "Unknown Computers"
Correct TS (with correct boot image) is targetted for this collection
In SMSPXE.log I can find the following:
Client boot action reply: <ClientIDReply><Identification Unknown="0" ItemKey="2046820352" ServerName="" ServerRemoteName=""><Machine><ClientID/><NetbiosName/></Machine></Identification><PXEBootAction
LastPXEAdvertisementID="" LastPXEAdvertisementTime="" OfferID="" OfferIDTime="" PkgID="" PackageVersion="" PackagePath="" BootImageID="" Mandatory=""/></ClientIDReply>
SMSPXE 7/07/2014 12:37:51 2052 (0x0804)
3C:97:0E:**:**:**, 5589C501-5273-11CB-8236-************: no advertisements found SMSPXE 7/07/2014 12:37:51 2052 (0x0804)
3C:97:0E:**:**:**, 5589C501-5273-11CB-8236-************: No boot action. Rejected. SMSPXE 7/07/2014 12:37:51 2052 (0x0804)
3C:97:0E:**:**:**, 5589C501-5273-11CB-8236-************: Not serviced. SMSPXE 7/07/2014 12:37:51 2052 (0x0804)
Getting boot action for unknown machine: item key: 2046820*** SMSPXE 7/07/2014 12:37:53 2052 (0x0804)
Item key "2046820***" is the corresponding "x64 Uknown Computer". Sometimes this will be "x86 Unkown Computer" for the same device.
When looking at previous entries in the logfile, this computer was once unkown and wa able to receive a PXE:
3C:97:0E:**:**:**, 5589C501-5273-11CB-8236-************: device is not in the database. SMSPXE 4/07/2014 11:26:20 2052 (0x0804)
Getting boot action for unknown machine: item key: 2046820352 SMSPXE 4/07/2014 11:26:20 2052 (0x0804)
Client boot action reply: <ClientIDReply><Identification Unknown="0" ItemKey="2046820352" ServerName="" ServerRemoteName=""><Machine><ClientID>e5a90706-d840-4261-93ca-************</ClientID><NetbiosName/></Machine></Identification><PXEBootAction
LastPXEAdvertisementID="" LastPXEAdvertisementTime="" OfferID="D30201C3" OfferIDTime="11/23/2012 3:14:00 PM" PkgID="D3000091" PackageVersion="" PackagePath="http://*webserver*/SMS_DP_SMSPKG$/D3000019"
BootImageID="D3000019" Mandatory="1"/></ClientIDReply>
SMSPXE 4/07/2014 11:26:20 2052 (0x0804)
3C:97:0E:**:**:**, 5589C501-5273-11CB-8236-************: using advertisement D30201C3 SMSPXE 4/07/2014 11:26:20 2052 (0x0804)
Getting boot action for unknown machine: item key: 2046820352 SMSPXE 4/07/2014 11:26:22 2052 (0x0804)
Client boot action reply: <ClientIDReply><Identification Unknown="0" ItemKey="2046820352" ServerName="" ServerRemoteName=""><Machine><ClientID>e5a90706-d840-4261-93ca-************</ClientID><NetbiosName/></Machine></Identification><PXEBootAction
LastPXEAdvertisementID="" LastPXEAdvertisementTime="" OfferID="D30201C3" OfferIDTime="11/23/2012 3:14:00 PM" PkgID="D3000091" PackageVersion="" PackagePath="http://*webserver*/SMS_DP_SMSPKG$/D3000019"
BootImageID="D3000019" Mandatory="1"/></ClientIDReply>
SMSPXE 4/07/2014 11:26:22 2052 (0x0804)
3C:97:0E:**:**:**, 5589C501-5273-11CB-8236-************: using advertisement D30201C3 SMSPXE 4/07/2014 11:26:22 2052 (0x0804)
Getting boot action for unknown machine: item key: 2046820352 SMSPXE 4/07/2014 11:26:24 2052 (0x0804)
Client boot action reply: <ClientIDReply><Identification Unknown="0" ItemKey="2046820352" ServerName="" ServerRemoteName=""><Machine><ClientID>e5a90706-d840-4261-93ca-************</ClientID><NetbiosName/></Machine></Identification><PXEBootAction
LastPXEAdvertisementID="" LastPXEAdvertisementTime="" OfferID="D30201C3" OfferIDTime="11/23/2012 3:14:00 PM" PkgID="D3000091" PackageVersion="" PackagePath="http://*webserver*/SMS_DP_SMSPKG$/D3000019"
BootImageID="D3000019" Mandatory="1"/></ClientIDReply>
SMSPXE 4/07/2014 11:26:24 2052 (0x0804)
3C:97:0E:**:**:**, 5589C501-5273-11CB-8236-************: using advertisement D30201C3 SMSPXE 4/07/2014 11:26:24 2052 (0x0804)
Getting boot action for unknown machine: item key: 2046820*** SMSPXE 4/07/2014 11:26:28 2052 (0x0804)
Client boot action reply: <ClientIDReply><Identification Unknown="0" ItemKey="2046820***" ServerName="" ServerRemoteName=""><Machine><ClientID>96de0ff0-0bc2-4f21-ac90-***********</ClientID><NetbiosName/></Machine></Identification><PXEBootAction
LastPXEAdvertisementID="" LastPXEAdvertisementTime="" OfferID="D30201C3" OfferIDTime="11/23/2012 3:14:00 PM" PkgID="D3000091" PackageVersion="" PackagePath="http://*webserver*/SMS_DP_SMSPKG$/D3000019"
BootImageID="D3000019" Mandatory="1"/></ClientIDReply>
SMSPXE 4/07/2014 11:26:28 2052 (0x0804)
3C:97:0E:**:**:**, 5589C501-5273-11CB-8236-************: using advertisement D30201C3 SMSPXE 4/07/2014 11:26:28 2052 (0x0804)
Looking for bootImage D3000019 SMSPXE 4/07/2014 11:26:28 2052 (0x0804)
What could be the issue? Is it possible that there is still some record referring to this PC and how can I trace/delete it?
Would restarting the WDS server solve this issue?
Thanks in advance!

Client lookup reply: <ClientIDReply><Identification Unknown="0" ItemKey="0" ServerName="" ServerRemoteName=""><Machine><ClientID/><NetbiosName/></Machine></Identification></ClientIDReply>
SMSPXE 7/07/2014 12:37:35 2052 (0x0804)
3C:97:0E:**:**:**, 5589C501-5273-11CB-8236-************: device is not in the database. SMSPXE 7/07/2014 12:37:35 2052 (0x0804)
Getting boot action for unknown machine: item key: 2046820352 SMSPXE 7/07/2014 12:37:35 2052 (0x0804)
Client boot action reply: <ClientIDReply><Identification Unknown="0" ItemKey="2046820352" ServerName="" ServerRemoteName=""><Machine><ClientID/><NetbiosName/></Machine></Identification><PXEBootAction LastPXEAdvertisementID=""
LastPXEAdvertisementTime="" OfferID="" OfferIDTime="" PkgID="" PackageVersion="" PackagePath="" BootImageID="" Mandatory=""/></ClientIDReply>
SMSPXE 7/07/2014 12:37:35 2052 (0x0804)
3C:97:0E:**:**:**, 5589C501-5273-11CB-8236-************: no advertisements found SMSPXE 7/07/2014 12:37:35 2052 (0x0804)
3C:97:0E:**:**:**, 5589C501-5273-11CB-8236-************: No boot action. Rejected. SMSPXE 7/07/2014 12:37:35 2052 (0x0804)
3C:97:0E:**:**:**, 5589C501-5273-11CB-8236-************: Not serviced. SMSPXE 7/07/2014 12:37:35 2052 (0x0804)
Getting boot action for unknown machine: item key: 2046820353 SMSPXE 7/07/2014 12:37:37 2052 (0x0804)
Client boot action reply: <ClientIDReply><Identification Unknown="0" ItemKey="2046820353" ServerName="" ServerRemoteName=""><Machine><ClientID/><NetbiosName/></Machine></Identification><PXEBootAction LastPXEAdvertisementID=""
LastPXEAdvertisementTime="" OfferID="" OfferIDTime="" PkgID="" PackageVersion="" PackagePath="" BootImageID="" Mandatory=""/></ClientIDReply>
SMSPXE 7/07/2014 12:37:37 2052 (0x0804)
3C:97:0E:**:**:**, 5589C501-5273-11CB-8236-************: no advertisements found SMSPXE 7/07/2014 12:37:37 2052 (0x0804)
Getting boot action for unknown machine: item key: 2046820352 SMSPXE 7/07/2014 12:37:51 2052 (0x0804)
Client boot action reply: <ClientIDReply><Identification Unknown="0" ItemKey="2046820352" ServerName="" ServerRemoteName=""><Machine><ClientID/><NetbiosName/></Machine></Identification><PXEBootAction LastPXEAdvertisementID=""
LastPXEAdvertisementTime="" OfferID="" OfferIDTime="" PkgID="" PackageVersion="" PackagePath="" BootImageID="" Mandatory=""/></ClientIDReply>
SMSPXE 7/07/2014 12:37:51 2052 (0x0804)
3C:97:0E:**:**:**, 5589C501-5273-11CB-8236-************: no advertisements found SMSPXE 7/07/2014 12:37:51 2052 (0x0804)
3C:97:0E:**:**:**, 5589C501-5273-11CB-8236-************: No boot action. Rejected. SMSPXE 7/07/2014 12:37:51 2052 (0x0804)
3C:97:0E:**:**:**, 5589C501-5273-11CB-8236-************: Not serviced. SMSPXE 7/07/2014 12:37:51 2052 (0x0804)
Getting boot action for unknown machine: item key: 2046820353 SMSPXE 7/07/2014 12:37:53 2052 (0x0804)
Client boot action reply: <ClientIDReply><Identification Unknown="0" ItemKey="2046820353" ServerName="" ServerRemoteName=""><Machine><ClientID/><NetbiosName/></Machine></Identification><PXEBootAction LastPXEAdvertisementID=""
LastPXEAdvertisementTime="" OfferID="" OfferIDTime="" PkgID="" PackageVersion="" PackagePath="" BootImageID="" Mandatory=""/></ClientIDReply>
SMSPXE 7/07/2014 12:37:53 2052 (0x0804)
3C:97:0E:**:**:**, 5589C501-5273-11CB-8236-************: no advertisements found SMSPXE 7/07/2014 12:37:53 2052 (0x0804)
These are all of the lines of that PXE boot (previous and next values have a timestamp difference of 3 minutes).
Thanks for looking into this, Torsten!

"srvctl start instance -d some_db -i some_db2" executes too long

Hi,
We got [2 node Oracle 10g RAC (10.2.0.4) on hpux 11.31 v3].
While starting second instance of some databases through "srvctl start instance -d some_db -i some_db2" it takes almost 5-10 minutes. While this "instance startup" process, some clients experience "disconnect"/"service loss".
TNSNAMES.ORA for a database looks like:
some_db =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = 192.168.1.136)(PORT = 1525))
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = 192.168.1.137)(PORT = 1525))
(LOAD_BALANCE=yes)
(CONNECT_DATA =
(server=dedicated)(service_name=some_db)
(failover_mode=(type=select)(method=basic)(retries=180)(delay=5))
The questions are:
- what could be wrong and where?
- what additional info would be helpful that I can provide?
Best Regards,

Hi,
The space on the disk volumes sould not be the cause for such a message, probably.
Real cause seems the bug mentioned in posts (by Ivan Kartik):
- Not able to start the RAC database service
- http://ivan.kartik.sk/static/42/
Suspicion also on datetime matters in the second node, as log files in that node show different timestamp than that of the OS. (alert log timestamp difference in a RAC node
_Digging further yet.

Timestamp difference

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for