To Identify right IDOC for Non PO based Invoice posting

Hi,
Business requirement is to post a non PO inbound invoice which is available in the flat file to a SAP system using IDoc.
The Idoc Should post the G/L & Cost center detail available in Flat file in to SAP system.
No automatic assignment of cost center with G/L account is required.
So we want to know a IDoc which SAP recommends/or should be used for the process with the matching process type.
Any help in this regard is highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards
Upender

Hi,
Have you considered ACLPAY01 ?
Regards,
Anand Mandalika.

Similar Messages

  • Vendor code shall be editable for non-po based invoice

    hi,
    how to do Vendor code shall be editable for non-po based invoice.

    Hi Praveen,
    You cannot create a Invoice without reference to PO through MIRO,
    You can create a Invoice witout reference to PO throughj FB60 where you can enter the vendor of your choice.
    Cheers
    Chris

  • Activation of standars workflow for Non PO based Invoices

    Hi All,
    Please advise me with the following at earliest.
    I have activated the standard workflow for the transaction FV60, so that the work item will be generated in the approver inbox for the release amount. I have done the settings, but iam stuck up at the transaction OBWF, it says to assign the users to the position or the organizational unit. I have created the Posistion in transaction code PO13 (Posistion in Business work flow), could you please let me know how to assign users to this position.

    Hi,
    For setting the organization object for each level using OBWF transaction, you have to select the entry in transaction OBWF (in which the WF Variant + Approval Path + Level+Amount will decide which agent to pick) and choose button "Details (OrgObject)".
    Then in new window
    1. choose button "Org object" of create (2nd button on tool bar) if already the org object is created and you just want to link.  Then select JOB/Position/Organizational unit for which you want a linking.  Then choose the org element by using the Search Term window.  This will create the link for the level for which you wanted the user/user-group.
    2. Choose button "Create org. unit" to create new org unit like Job or Position and then complete linking as specified in point -1.
    You can test this by executing the function moudule "PRELIMINARY_POSTING_ACTOR1_DET" which is in the standard agent rule '00000139' which is linked to the standard task TS00007914.
    Hope this will help you, but aswer for this is very late.
    Regards,
    Manju

  • Duplicate check for non inventory vendor invoices in Finance

    Hi,
    SAP provides duplicate check for non inventory vendor invoices posted through transactions F-43 and FB01 etc. The field values checked for duplicate invoice include Document date and Reference field.
    I want to know, is there any flexibility of removing Document date from checking criteria?
    This is to facilitate picking more invoices in duplicate check net.
    Regards,
    Vijay

    Dear Vijay
    Yes, you can control this via business transaction events. Please review the below explanation.
    In Rel 4.6, duplicate invoices are checked using function module
    FI_DUPLICATE_INVOICE_CHECK which is called when invoices are posted via trans FB60.  Duplicate invoice checking criteria can be customized using the open FI interface SAMPLE_PROCESS_00001110 (custom function module) starting from Rel 4.6.  Please verify if the open FI interface 00001110 is being used in your system and review duplicate invoice selection criteria via trans BERP. You may wish to omit the document date (BLDAT field from the duplicate invoice check criteria to trigger error msg F5117.  In addition, table BSIP (vendor duplicate documents) may need to be updated.  (see note 114563 for further info).
    Please also check note 537213, and note 31771 for your information.
    If this helps please reward with points.
    Best Regards
    Kesav

  • Invoice Posting using INVOIC02 Idoc for PO and Non-Po based invoices

    Hi All,
      We have a problem regarding posting Invoices using Idocs.
    We have po and non-po invoices coming frm thirdparty in the form of idoc files.
    We need a clarification whether Invoic02 idoc can handle both Po and Non Po Based invoices or threre are seperate idoc types or message types for Po and Non Po Invoices.
    Could any one give some inputs on Partner Profiles also for this senario.
    Please kindly reply as early as possible.
    Regards
    Anil Kumar K

    Hi
      I Got your name from this site.I would be very thankful if you can help me here.I am designing a EDI based invoice LIV.Is it possible to post some charges which are without PO reference but are coming in Vendor Invoices.Is it possible to post these kind of charges with EDI message INOIC01 or we have to post through FI posting.If possible through EDI in which segment of IDOC we will enter these charges with amt.Also is it possible to post credit memo also with EDI
    Thanks
    Sanjeev

  • PO Release Strategy - Only for non material based

    Experts,
    I have a requirement to implement a release strategy for a single plant for POs for NON material based purchases ( only for using account assignments, cost centers etc).
    The release strategy I configured is working only for the specific plant I want... However, it works whether its a material based PO or a non material based PO.
    How do i get the strategy to work for only the service based purchases, and not the material ones?

    Thanks for the replies but I'm not sure if they are applicable...
    I did create a characterstic for item categories and added the one's I wanted to have... I did NOT include a blank because i thought that would make the difference between the material based PO and non PO. When we I create Po with material (even with no account assignment) it still goes through release.
    Any reason why that is?
    I dont believe the material group solution will not work either because we require material group for material and non material based POs..
    Side note - when i try to use CEKKO with KTTNP, i get a "KTTNP does not exist error." So i used EKPO - KTTNP... hopefully thats ok, but please let me know if its not.
    Edited by: farmerj3 on Jan 30, 2012 3:36 PM
    Edited by: farmerj3 on Jan 30, 2012 3:39 PM
    Edited by: farmerj3 on Jan 30, 2012 3:48 PM

  • GR Reversal for Non GR based invoce Purchase order

    Hi Experts
    I have a query on standard SAP behavior
    I create a PO with GR indicator checked IR indicator checked but GR based IV indicator not checked
    this is a PO with Non GR based invoice
    Now I create Invoice  for full PO qty, the made GR for full qty and Invoice has been released for payment ( No blocks)
    Now I am reversing the invoice. During this reversal if the system throws an error or warning saying Invoice exists for PO.
    Please clarify
    Regards
    Kamalakkannan

    >
    Kamalakkannan Kandasamy wrote:
    > Hi Experts
    >
    > I have a query on standard SAP behavior
    >
    > I create a PO with GR indicator checked IR indicator checked but GR based IV indicator not checked
    >
    > this is a PO with Non GR based invoice
    >
    > Now I create Invoice  for full PO qty, the made GR for full qty and Invoice has been released for payment ( No blocks)
    >
    > Now I am reversing the invoice. During this reversal if the system throws an error or warning saying Invoice exists for PO.
    >
    > Please clarify
    >
    > Regards
    >
    > Kamalakkannan
    The question is not clear, is the system throwing a message at you. Seems like you have completed the cycle, and now you are reversing the invoice, that should not cause any messages coming up, unless you make a mistake in reversing

  • PO & non-PO based invoices

    Hi Gurus',
    How can I get the list of PO and non-PO based invoices, whose payment proposal has not run yet.
    Thanks & Regards,
    VK

    Hi,
    Normally, it means open items; you can use FBL1N report for example.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Workflow for non PO base invoice (FV60)

    Dear All,
    I am trying to customizing workflow for non po base invoice. I have done all the nessary customization setting - obwa , obwj , obwb, obwc, obwd.obwe,obwf & using subworkflow WS10000051. Also I have checked that both Released Necessary & Doc. complited marked when document parked. I refered the following thread for the customization setting.
    Re: Hi Csaba Soltesz, How can you activate workflow
    Now the workflow is not triggering when I a document parked(save as complited). I am checking this via. FB03 ---> workflow --> Workflow overview
    Please not that workflow is working perfectly for other company code in the same client. Hence nessary workflow setting already maintiained in the client.
    *Kindly let me know whether I have missed some step?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    spsahu

    answered

  • PO based Invoice posting

    Hi ,
    How do I do PO based invoice posting . I have always done GR based Invoice verification . But I have a scenario where the vendor wants to do invoice before GRN . So I guess we will have to do PO based invoice verification.
    Regards
    Nandini

    Hi
    You can do the Invoicing with reference to PO just like any other Invoicing, the difference  in your case is you will get empty line items in MIRO screen since you have not done any Goods receipt. In Import PO scenario we  carry out similar payment clearences for all kinds of taxes. So there is nothing psecial yo have to do , only thing you need to take care is that you do not have the Gr-Bsd IV indicator activated.
    Regards

  • Identify elevated process for non-admin

    Although it is unusual, unpriviledged users can run elevated under their normal credentials (not with admin creds).  This most commonly occurs with logon scripts run from GPO. 
    Running elevated messes some things up (particularly drive mapping).  Thus, I'm looking for a way for a script to identify if it is running elevated.  I know how to find elevated status for administrators:
    $identity = [System.Security.Principal.WindowsIdentity]::GetCurrent()
    $principal = New-Object System.Security.Principal.WindowsPrincipal( $identity )
    $admin = [System.Security.Principal.WindowsBuiltInRole]::Administrator
    if ($principal.IsInRole( $admin )) {
    # script is running as an admin
    But this doesn't work (obviously) for non-admins.
    This article
    is helpful for testing for elevated processes, but it doesn't work if run elevated itself.
    Anyone have any suggestions? 
    Thanks.

    Hi Cascomp,
    In addition, Please also check the script below to determine running elevated or not.
    [bool]((whoami /groups) -match "S-1-16-12288")
    The SID "S-1-16-12288" imply the group the current user belong to has a High Mandatory Level Label, and the elevated user has the high level, which can be found HERE.
    For more detailed information about Windows Integrity Mechanism, please also refer to this article:
    http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb625963.aspx
    Q: How can I quickly tell if my PowerShell window is running elevated?
    http://windowsitpro.com/powershell/q-how-can-i-quickly-tell-if-my-powershell-window-running-elevated
    If you have any feedback on
    our support, please click here.
    Best Regards,
    Anna
    TechNet Community Support

  • IAS for non Database based web site

    We are using IAS for our website using Oracle Forms/Reports and Oracle databse 8i.
    We have now to develop small websites in pure HTML (no java, no Oracle Forms), we are wondering if it is still a good option to use IAS as the web server for those applications. If yes, do we simply have to define a new application in IAS but without connection string to a database?
    Same questions for web site based on Oracle 8i databse and JSP (without any Oracle forms and reports)

    Hi,
    Yes, you can do that by creating a new custom folder that will contain the following sql:
    select 'W' Flag_lov from dual
    union all
    select 'F' Flag from dual
    union all
    select 'M' Flag from dual
    union all
    select 'D' Flag from dual
    Then cerate an item class on that field and associate it with the "Flag" field from the original folder you use in the report.
    In the process of the item class creation you can select the items that will use that item class ("Flag").
    Now when you'll run the workbook you'll get the LOV for the flag.
    Also after you finished the configuration i suggest that you'll hide the custom folder you just created since it has no use for the users. you can do that by going to the folder properties and change the "Visible to User" to "Yes".

  • Distinguishing between IDocs for Delivery, Shipment and Invoice

    Hi Experts,
    I have a requirement where I am triggering IDocs from SAP for Delivery Document, Shipment and Invoice and sending them to a third-party middleware everytime they are created in SAP, by configuring output types for these documents.
    I want to know if we have any field in these IDocs's Structures that can be used to distinguish between the different documents such that we can identify which document has been received based on this field (or combination of fields)?
    I tried to use Document Category for this purpose, but this field is not available in Invoice and moreover, the IDoc Segment names are different for every IDoc's message type.
    The key point here is that I am not allowed to do any sort of Customization in SAP to achieve this and I can only go about using the Standard Functions inherently available in SAP.
    Please suggest a possible solution for this predicament of mine.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Keerthi

    Hello Keerthi
    I do not see where the problem lies.
    We exchange via FTP share  similar documents with one of our logistics partner:
    Inbound delivery (VL33N) => sent as DESADV.DELVRY03 => converted on SAP-XI to TRADACOMS ORDHDR => file suffix .LTI
    Shipping Order (VL03N) => sent as SHPORD.DELVRY03   => converted on SAP-XI to TRADACOMS ORDHDR => file suffix .LTO
    I am not a fan of functional file names yet if the third-party tools is not capable to distinguish between the documents based on their contents at runtime then we need old-fashioned unique file suffixes.
    Of course the two ORDHDR messages can be distinguished based on their contents. The message contains a TYP segment with the following qualifiers:
    TYP/TYP2 = '0430' = (shipping) order (= outbound delivery)
    TYP/TYP2 = '0660' = inbound delivery
    From this logistics partner we receive two different kinds of DLCHDR (delivery confirmation) messages:
    TYP/TYP2 = '0670' = Proof of Delivery for (shipping) order => mapped to STPPOD.DELVRY03
    TYP/TYP2 = '0695' = Goods receipt for inbound delivery    => mapped to WHSCON.DELVRY03
    The files have different suffixes yet they are not evaluated. SAP-XI just picks both messages and evaluates at runtime whether it has to transform the DLCHDR into a STPPOD or WHSCON IDoc.
    Regards
      Uwe

  • Stock report for a period (based on posting date)

    Hi Experts,
    We have a requirement as under:
    1) We want a report for a period say from 01.04.2011 to 30.09.2011 (closed period for both MM and FI postings). Report is being taken on a later date say 01.12.2011.
    2) The report should say the status of stock as of 30.09.2011 only even of being taken in the month of December
    3) I tried to take the desired report through MB5B for the period 30.09.2011 to 30.09.2011 (selection date fields) on 20th december, 2011 and noticed that if same report with the same selection criteria is taken at two different times, output data is not the same whereas MM and FI posting periods are already closed.
    Can anybody suggest alternative SAP standard report where output will remain the same if report with same selection criteria is taken at different intervals ELSE in case of change we should be able to see the documents posted in between if back dated entries have been posted after opening MM /FI period.
    thanks

    sure it speaks the same, but it mentions as well the reasons (1) and has much more information (2)  and a solution.(3)
    1)
    user starts transaction MB5B for a very large number of materials or for all materials in a plant
    During the runtime of transaction MB5B, goods movements are posted in parallel:
               - The results of transaction MB5B are incorrect.
               - Each run of transaction MB5B returns different results for the same combination of "material + plant".
    Example: Transaction MB5B should process 100 materials with 10,000 MM documents each. The system takes approximately 1 second to read the material master data  and it takes approximately 1 hour to read the MM and FI documents. A goods movement for a material to be processed is posted approximately 10 minutes after you start transaction MB5B. The stock for this material before this posting has already been determined. The new MM document is also read, however. The stock read before the posting is used as the basis for calculating the stocks for the start and end date.
    Even for an old and closed period, MB5B starts today and calculates backwards  any movement to finally get the stock for  the time your specified in your selection.
    2)
    The SAP standard release does not include a solution
    so you have to understand that there is no real alternative transaction in SAP
    3) and then they provide a large section with a workaround that can be developed by an experienced programmer within 3 to 5 days.
    So how shall anyone here be able to tell you an alternative report?
    if someone does, then it is an owndeveloped z-report which is not available in your sap system.
    if you know that people want lookup period closing stocks at any time in future, then either schedule MB52 at month end and store the list somewhere (and do not allow backposting)
    or have an Abaper create a stock report based on the history tables MARDH, MCHBH, MBEWH etc.
    And even here you may encounter an issue at some day, if you start archving special stocks or material masters, because then the stock figures from the historic tables are gone and you cannot rebuilt a reliable stock report .

  • Assembler API for non-spring based development?

    Has anyone used the Assembler API to develop applications that dont leverage the spring framework? Even better, is there any way the Assembler API can be leveraged without using any framework (just pojos)?
    Trying to understand how a UI migration from the presentation API or the content API to Assembler API would look like for legacy Endeca implementations.

    Certainly possible to do this and I believe there are customers who choose to go this route. One application off the top of my head that does this is the ATG/Endeca sample app. Also, if you attempt to integrate Endeca into the Commerce Reference Store (CRS), it's typically a more POJO style experience (.properties files instead of Spring XML, etc.).
    Now, both of those probably have too much "overhead" and may not really apply to non-ATG implementations. All of the API calls are documented, i think the key is probably to start it as a "conversion project" and start to port over the different elements of the configuration (Assembler Factory initialization, etc.) to something POJO-based.
    If the question is simply integrating the existing assembler logic in a non-Spring application, you should be able to hit the RESTful service to get JSON/XML back and forth to your application. Your cartridges and templates would still be managed inside Spring and via the assembler-context but you could grab the content and use it in pretty much any scenario.
    EX: http://localhost:8006/assembler/json/pages/browse
    Note that the assembler service, by default, uses a different set of configuration files (reference/discover-service/WEB-INF/*) than the Discover Data or Discover Authoring applications.
    Hope that helps,
    Patrick Rafferty
    http://branchbird.com

Maybe you are looking for

  • Trying to updgrade iphoto 4.0.3

    I am trying to revitalize an old MAC for use and want to put sme photos on it that have been upgrades to Version 6. I have IPhoto 4.0.3 installed and when I try to upgrade to 5 or 6 versions the installer program says that it can not find an eligible

  • Problem signing in after updating Skype

    I have just updated Skype to its new version, entered my username and password as asked, and the signing in goes on forever. The same thing happened the last time I updated. Any suggestion? 

  • Updating from Beta issue

    Hi, Cannot update from Beta version of the maps. Please help regards Raj

  • Inventory managment Snap Shot scenario.Urgent

    Hi, I am doing snapshot scenario for inventory management in BI 7.0. , when i am doing that i have small doubt , as said in stepo by step process of that document i am doing, for the non-cumulative key figures we need to use cumulative key figures as

  • Charging via usb

    Phone = E60 Does the usb cable for data connection - PCSuite etc - also charge the phone when connected or is that function exclusively through the power connector? Thanks Dave