Tolerance table BBP_PDTOL - Purchase Order Item relation

Dear Experts,
Would anybody be able to describe field relationship between
Purchase Order Item and tolerance table BBP_PDTOL.
CRMD_ORDERADM_I-GUID  -   BBP_PDTOL-GUID relation is not work.
Sincerely yours, Sergey.

The document header/item relation with a depending object, such as tolerance, is through a third table, CRMD_LINK. So,
CRMD_ORDERADM_I-GUID <=> CRMD_LINK-GUID_HI
CRMD_LINK-GUID_SET <=> BBP_PDTOL-SET_GUID

Similar Messages

  • Expand Table Control with Fields for Purchase Order Item Overview

    Hi Gurus.
    Hereu2019s something easy for you, I hope/ think. We just want to additionally show the field u201CMFRPNu201D in the purchase order item overview. See structure MEPO1211 for the table control.
    How can we do this? Is it possible without a modification? Is there anything to pay attention to?
    Lot's of questions, because we donu2019t find any complete solutions yet. It seems there are no official SAP suggestions for this issue.
    Thanks in advance!
    Regards
    Patric

    Is there no one out there who can answer my question?

  • Tables for sales & purchase order data relating to delivery

    hi all,
    i am writing a report to download all the delivery data after the delivery is created.i have to download the sales order data & purchase order data relating to this delivery also.
    i am using likp & lips table for delivery.which tables i
    should use to get the sales order data & PO data for the same delivery (likp-vbeln). i.e i need the sales & purchase order related tables which has link with delivery tables like likp & lips etc.
    plz advice me. it is very urgent.
    any idea is highly appreaciated.
    Regards
    pabitra

    in Addition to NM ,
    in case of STO there is no Sales Order , Process will be like this
    PO-->Delivery->PGI--->Billing  then u have to
    link
    *getting the History data of the PO
            select ebeln
                   ebelp
                   belnr
                   menge
                   from ekbe
                   into corresponding fields of table  w_ekbe
                   where ebeln eq w_lips-vgbel
                     and ebelp eq w_lips-vgpos
                     and bewtp eq 'L'.
    Regards
    Prabhu

  • Which Table stores Purchase Order Related to Parked Invoice

    Hi
    Which Table stores Purchase Order Related to Parked Invoice?  I am not able to get that information. Thanks a lot in advance for any help.
    Thanks
    Arghadip

    Hi
    Check Table RSEG with the parked Invoice document number.
    Thanks & Regards
    Kishore

  • In MR11 - u201CNo (suitable) purchase order/item found     u201C.

    Hi Friends,
    We are having issue with MR11 in 4.6 B. While doing MR11 for a PO where Delivery costs have not been balanced, we are getting message u201CNo (suitable) purchase order/item found     u201C.
    In the research, we found that in 4.6 B, MR11 is using program SAPMM08K, where as in ECC 6.00, it is using program SAPRCKM_MR11.
    Initial fetch from PO history table :
    4.6 B -> In 4.6 B we are using EKBI view (Join via EKKO / EKPO / EKBE for MR11) to fetch the PO history table. (It is not considering EKBZ table for delivery cost records)
    Program is checking the Quantity of EKBI, if there is no difference in quantity then it is coming out of loop and showing message
    No (suitable) purchase order/item found
        Message no. M8 401
    3CAUSE&
        No purchase order exists which corresponds to your entry for a quantity
        difference posting.
    ECC 6 -> In ECC 6.00 we are using view V_CKMLGRIR (DB View: Selection for MR11 Clearing GR/IR Clearing Account Table u2013 EKKO, EKPO and EKBE)
    Here also program is checking the Quantity in the View, if there is no difference in quantity then it is going for another fetch (which is missing in 4.6 B).
    In the another fetch, it is checking View V_CKMLGRIR_FR (DB View: Selection for MR11 Clearing Freight Clearing Accnt Table u2013 EKKO, EKPO and EKBZ)
    I've searched sap notes but couldn't find much help. I've tried different search criteria but no luck. Could anyone able to help me?
    Thanks,
    Ramesh S

    HI
    MR11 will show only the blocked invoices due to quantity/price difference.
    First of all please check your invoice (MIRO of your required PO) that it is blocked for invoice verification or not .(Please note block for payment is not relevant for MR11).
    Further please check if you have mainatined any tolerance in GRN (MIGO) for under or over delivery , so it is not escaping the PO due to under/over tolerance limit.
    Cheers
    Mukta

  • Purchase order item(2lis_02_itm) and 0PUR_O01  transformation

    Hello,
    I'm trying to populate  DSO 0PUR_O01 with  standard DS 2LIS_02_ITM Purchase Order Items
    The mappings are not copied after BCT installation. so i have  trouble in mappings some of the  keyfigures of 0PUR_O01 with the extractor fields. It's confusing.
    I did try to check rsosfieldmap for the datasource but failed to display any data for 2LIS_02_ITM. There are no entries in the table foe this DS.
    0PDLV_QTY Actual Quantity Delivered
    0PREQU_QTY Desired Delivery Quantity
    0PCONF_QTY Confirmed Quantity
    0PDVQLECR Quantity Delivered Late Acc. to Requested Delivery Date
    0PDVQEYSC Quantity Delivered Early According to Schedule Line Date
    0PDVQLESC Quantity Delivered Late According to Schedule Line Date
    0PQCOASREQ Quantity Confirmed as Requested
    0LOWR_BND Tolerance Limit for Under Delivery in %
    0UPPR_BND Tolerance Limit for Over Delivery in %
    Please suggest how to go ahead with the mappings ..

    Hello Raj,
    What ur following 3.5 or 7.0...?
    In 7 there are less chances for mapping after BCT installation, you have to do manually mapping in some cases. You can also face some problem of copying routine. So need to see each and every field accordingly.
    Best practice is to install in 3.5 and then migrate to 7 with appropriate steps.
    Thanks,
    Santosh

  • Standard program for unbilled  sales orders and purchase order items

    Can anyone advice,  is there any standard program which gives the unbilled sales order and purchase order items.

    Hi,
    Use the T.Code VA05/VA05n for list of all the sales order s which are open.
    Take T.Code:VA05N
    Select the option "Open Sales Orders".
    Execute.
    It will give you all the orders which are open.
    The standard program for this is:"SD_SALES_ORDERS_VIEW".
    The same you can also get by using the T.Code VF04.
    In this if your scenario is "Order related",then select the option "Order related".
    Else if it is "Delivery related",then select "Delivery-related".
    Execute.
    The standatd program for this is:"SDBILLDL".
    T.Code:VF05/VF05n is for list of billing documents.
    Regards,
    Krishna.
    Note:Pls search the forum.

  • Free Item in Purchase Order Item

    Hello All,
    I would like to ask where in table level can I identify Purchase Orders which have "Free Item".  Because on the screen field i saw from the technical definition that the "Free Item" is of field MEPO1211-UMSON, but when I go to EKPO I cannot find the corresponding field.
    I have this idea but I don't know if it is right or not, in case I uncheck the "Invoice Receipt" in the Purchase Order Item details, the "Free Item" check box appears.  So I am thinking is all Purchase Order Items which have "Invoice Receipt" (EKPO-REPOS) uncheck considered as a "Free Item".
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    When we are talking about Free Items, in SAP terms, it means that we would not have any conditions/Gross/Net Price.
    Also, Invoice Receipt will be unchecked because for free items, there would not be any invoice right?
    So we can conclude that, once Invoice Receipt is unchecked + Free items is checked, this particular line item will be received as free goods.
    Note that if the material is valuated, it will affect your MAP (moving average price).

  • Issue with purchase order item

    Hi Guys,
    When entering or changing an order in SAP via VA01/VA02, the system will not allow the entry of leading zeros in the Purchase Order Item (VBAP_POSEX) field which is defined as character 6. Leading zeros can be entered in the Customer Material (VBAP_KDMAT) which is also defined as character. Some customer PO Item numbers begin with leading zeros and they want to see them on output. Does SAP have an OSS note for this?  any helpful suggestion would be well appreciated.
    Thanks!
    Edited by: MK18774 on Oct 5, 2009 9:57 PM

    there is a include FV45PF0V_VBAP-POSEX_PRUEFEN
    that checks PO number and item number .... with your own EKPO (purchase order item) table.
    and this include has as well the routines to convert the number: CONVERSION_EXIT_ALPHA_INPUT

  • Import data to Purchase Order Item Level Text from DMS system

    Hi,
    I have the material PO Text maintained against the Material in the DMS system.
    In R/3, when I am creating the Purchase Order, I want the system to retreive the PO Text maintained in DMS against the material in the Purchase Order and paste it in the Purchase Order Item details - Material PO Texts.
    Could anyone suggest me which User Exit or BAPI and the Function Module to fetch this data from DMS.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Jeetendra

    Dear Gurus,
    We are able to populate the "Import Data" in the backend PO in our backend system 4.6C, thorugh user exit
    EXIT_SAPMM06E_004   &   EXIT_SAPLV50E_004.
    Now when we create PO from SRM , the import related foreign trade data gets filled up from the master data.
    Problem: In Header and Line item condition: We are not getting the condition type GRWR automatically, if the PO is comming from SRM. Because of this the statistical value is 0.
    ( If we create manual PO, the condition GRWR appears in PO - and the Statistical value gets filled in automatically )
    How can we put the condition type GRWR into the PO using user exit ?
    Thanks and regards,
    Anil Rajpal
    Edited by: ANIL on Aug 12, 2010 6:18 PM

  • Table For Purchase Order Version Number and Version Created Date

    Dear Sir,
    Whenever we make any change in Purchase Order , then a new Version Number  along with Created Date is assigned . In Me23n the Version Number and It's Created date is also displayed ( at PO Header Level) .
    We request you to kindly guide us as which Table is required to be reffered to get the Version Number and Version Created date  for the Purchase Order .
    With Thanks and Rgds
    Sonia

    Hi
    Check in EKKO - Purchase order header
    EKPO - Purchase order item
    CDHDR
    CHPOS
    Regards
    Ram
    Edited by: Parasuram M on Sep 16, 2009 11:59 AM

  • Purchase Order item value breakup condition type wise

    Dear Sir,
    We are developing a custom report and in this report we need to reflect  for Purchase Order item wise the break-up of values  at the condition type level .
    In Me23n , at at Item Level , when we click on tab <Condition> then all values break-up at condition type level gets displayed .
    But to use in custom program , we need to know the table  where this information is available .
    Kindly guide us pl .
    Regards
    B Mittal

    Hi,
    This suggestion is based on my understanding of your issue.  May not be straight forward SAP solution.
    I would suggest you to make following assessment for your custom program: (going through the condition tab will lead you to structures)
    1. Try to figure out how the pricing condition are maintained.  Normally you have your Base price PBXX or gross price per EA defined that can be found in the PIR of the material + Vendor combination or in the pricing condition you would have defined.
    2. In same way figure out all the other absolute condition types.  I mean any thing that is not % percentage based on PBXX value. (assess ;your pricing Schema to understand this.
    3. Once you know how is your pricing schema  breakup then try to pick the net price of PO and then do a backward calcuation based on PIR condition value.    .
    Hope this helps.
    thx
    MJ

  • MCEKPO-MENGE issue through 2LIS_02_ITM for Statistical Purchase Order Items

    Hello Everyone,
    I have come across this strange scenario where a given Purchase Order Item in the Source system - SAP R/3 has been changed in the following sequence,
    1. First the PO Item was marked as a Deleted PO - LOEKZ = L which set the STAPO = X (Statistical) and
    2. The Deletion Indicator was removed for the PO Item which means LOEKZ now is not having "L" and the STAPO also has been removed.
    Due to the above scenario, now the Order Quantity in the SAP BW system has 0 as the value whereas the Quantity in the SAP R/3 System shows up as 1.
    I was curious to know if there are any OSS Notes or processes in place to avoid this from happening. As I searched the forum and service place for the OSS notes related to this issue and could not find anything related.
    The Order Quantity in our system is extracted from 2LIS_02_ITM (MCEKPO-MENGE) field.
    Thanks in advance for the help.
    Dharma.

    hi Dharma..
    Did you find a solution for this post?
    I Have similar issue....
        I Have an issue (I think is issue)...with extractor 2LIS_02_ITM about reversal or deleted indicator….
    Some PO are created on R/3 and mark for deleted some line items… I try or I hope  received a “R” indicator…. But I didn´t receive the indicator…..
         I only receive “X” on this field.. (delete indicator). or in other examples  blank on this field
        What’s the difference between “X” , “R” and blank indicator?... when is posible receive X, R or blank value??
        I was thinking that when on R/3 some lines of PO orders were deleted.. I receive "R" indicator when I extract to  BW (on the PSA)... but I didn't...
       If you know how work this kind of cases or examples, please explain me more.. or let me know where can I find more information please.
        I will assign points to all the answer.
       Thank you
    Alice

  • No Update FMIOI and KBLP tables with purchase order

    Hello,
    We have un serious problem : No Update FMIOI and KBLP tables with purchase order
    System :  SAP ERP 6.0 /7.0 - EHP 4
    Note 965633 was read.
    1) First case: The purchase order 4510000673 does not reduce the funds reservation.
    Purchase order 4510000673 should consume the funds reservation 1200000193 because all post of the PO charge the funds reservation 1200000193.But the consumption history of the funds reservation 1200000193 donu2019t show this consumption.
    In table FMIOI, we do not have lines with amount type 0200 (reduction) but whe have the lines with the post of PO with amount type (0100).  The Purchase order 4510000673 should consume the funds reservation 1200000193.
    In table KBLP, the fields are :
    Total amount (LC) - HWGES  = 53.409,40
    Amount used u2013 WTABB = 0,00
    Reduction amount u2013 HWABB = 0,00
    Open amount u2013 CWTFREE =    53.409,40
    Reduced amount u2013 WTABG = 0,00
    Reduced amount u2013HWABG = 0,00
    To solve the problem, we executed the transactions : FM4N et FMN5 and the program RFFMRC20 but no result.
    2) Second case : Delete a item of a purchase order does not release the budget
    The single item of the purchase order 4510000597 is deleted but in the display of consumption History of the funds reservation 1200000137, the amount of the purchase order is not to zero.
    To solve the problem, we executed the transactions : FM4N et FMN5 and the program RFFMRC20 but no result.
    Somebody already had a similar problem ?
    Thank you
    Fabian

    Hello Fabian
    There are two known notes dealing with missing update on reference Earmarked Funds, I am listing them for future references:
    1376800  Earmarked funds: Incorrect open amount         
    1438487  RFFMRC20: Missing KBLE records are ignored     
    These notes correct some errors within the Standard.
    However, in your scenario, problem has to do with an incorrect execution of a Commit work inside a customer user-exit. After elimination of this commit work, new Po's are working correctly.
    Remaining task is the correction of old PO's. Manual correction via small changes with ME22N (for instance, adding a '.' to the line item text/s) will force the correct update and fix your database
    If you agree, we can close this thread (?)
    Kind regards
    Mar

  • Purchase Order item customer fields

    I have the following scenario:
    - I need to save some customer fields in Purchase Order item, when it is generated through the Shopping Cart (EBP).
    - When EBP will generate a PO in backend (R/3), it calls B470_PO_CREATE function module and inside it calls BAPI_PO_CREATE1 in R/3. This call does not use extensionin parameter.
    - I have all the values in PO_ITEMS parameters. (an append structure in bapi_mepoitem).
    - Trying to solve this, I think I have to use EXIT_SAPL2012_001 to create the extensionin parameter.
    - Anyone else has this problem?
    - How can I create the extensionin parameter? Is it only necessary to add 'BAPI_TE_MEPOITEM' and 'BAPI_TE_MEPOITEMX'?
    - Do you have an example?
    Thank you!

    Hi
    You have to extend CI_EKPODBX with the same fieldnames with type BAPIUPDATE (in SE11), and then while passing the EXTENSIONIN to the bapi, you have to flag those. Like the following:
    DATA: wa_extensionin TYPE BAPIPAREX,
    wa_BAPIPAREX TYPE BAPIPAREX,
    wa_BAPI_TE_MEPOITEM TYPE BAPI_TE_MEPOITEM,
    wa_BAPI_TE_MEPOITEMX TYPE BAPI_TE_MEPOITEMX.
    wa_BAPI_TE_MEPOITEM-po_item = <PO Line No.>.
    wa_BAPI_TE_MEPOITEM-ZZZ_FIELD1 = <z-field value>.
    wa_BAPIPAREX-STRUCTURE = 'BAPI_TE_MEPOITEM'.
    wa_BAPIPAREX-VALUEPART1 = wa_BAPI_TE_MEPOITEM.
    APPEND wa_BAPIPAREX TO extensionin.
    wa_BAPI_TE_MEPOITEMX-po_item = <PO Line No.>.
    wa_BAPI_TE_MEPOITEMX-ZZZ_FIELD1 = 'X'.
    wa_BAPIPAREX-STRUCTURE = 'BAPI_TE_MEPOITEMX'.
    wa_BAPIPAREX-VALUEPART1 = wa_BAPI_TE_MEPOITEMX.
    APPEND wa_BAPIPAREX TO extensionin.
    This will work. Please let me know if it does not.
    See related links ->
    Re: BAPI_PO_CREATE1 and EXTENSIONIN structure
    Re: Passing custom fields to BAPI
    Problem in populating userfields in PO using BAPI_PO_CREATE1
    Re: BAPI_PO_CHANGE
    Yann i need ur help..
    Re: Custom field values are not being transfered to the backend system
    Problem in populating userfields in PO using BAPI_PO_CREATE1
    Re: Implement ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST-Urgently!
    Re: Purchase Order (BAPI_PO_CREATE! --> EXTENSIONIN)
    Re: How to use BAPI extensions?
    Re: BAPI_PO_CREATE1 user fields not saving on EKPO
    BAPI_PO_CREATE1 - EXIT_SAPL2012_001
    Do let me know.
    Regards
    - Atul

Maybe you are looking for