Total confirmation quantity not equal to planned confirmation quantity

HI
In co11. if i entered more than operation quantity
its showing warning message
Total confirmation quantity not equal to planned confirmation quantity
Message no. RU117
how can i change into error msg???
thanks in advance

Dear,
Go to OPJB then select
00000000     RU  117 Total confirmation quantity not equal to planned confirmation quantity  E- Error.
It will work for you.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Similar Messages

  • Account total balance does not equal line item balance

    Hi,
    I find one account total balance diff with its line item balance? What could be the reason?
    Thanks

    I have seen this before in an account which was designated as a retained earnings account - prior year rolls into the account are not a posting in the conventional sense.
    Hope this helps!
    Regards
    Louise

  • MCHBH and MARDH tables are not equal

    Hi,
    We were trying to find periodic stock for batches, while we realise that MCHBH table total batch stock and MARDH total stock is not equal for an example of a material. Is that can be possible?
    Which table or bapi function is right for periodic batch stock ?
    Regards&Thanks,
    Begü

    S0001377806 wrote:
    >
    What movement types were used for this material and batch?
    -> many different movement types, GR/GI...
    this answer does not help, as it is movement type specific whether  SAP creates a batch number  or a posts to a storage location.  Without knowing the movement types that you used, I cannot really tell you why SAP updates the tables differently.
    you have to get deep knowledge on the movement types that are used in your company to make analysis like this one.
    Especially due to the fact that you are saying that it happens to many many materials, I do really think it is not an error in the SAP programs, it is more a misunderstanding on SAP processes, especially how the history tables are updated.
    Kunal gave you already the OSS note 193554. it explains the logic how SAP writes history records.
    SAP uses function modules to get the values from the previous period (which ones are explained in OSS note 415349)
    Thanks, this was actually the answer I was looking for
    I will look into movement type specific programming/customization.
    Edited by: Sebastian Stöckle on Nov 22, 2010 11:48 AM
    Edited by: Sebastian Stöckle on Nov 22, 2010 11:49 AM

  • Confirmation - Total of percentages must equal 100

    Dear All,
    We are using SRM 7.0 EHP1 support package level 11. At the time of goods receipt , i have the error "Total of percentages must equal 100" , "Error in account assignment for item 1" .  But it is ok while creating SC, PO.
    I've searched the forums and oss notes and found some notes related this issue. But they are valid up to support package level 10, therefore not suitable for me..
    So anyone who has further advice ?  If not, i think it is better to open a message to SAP ?
    Thanks in advance...
    Best regards,

    Hi Yateesh,
    In our case, we used a custom Account assignment category in PO which was mapped to a "ERP Standard Account Assignment Category - V". (This mapping could be checked in SPRO, under Account Assignment in SRM susyem).
    However the same ERP category 'V' is also mapped to additional SRM custom Account Assignment Categories.
    When the system tries to create the confirmation for the PO, it tries to reverse map the ERP category 'V' and since there is no one-to-one mapping, the system does a dynamic
    mapping based on the account field values and determines the account
    assignment category 'CC' instead. Now, the 'CC' account category might not be authorized for the user (With which you are trying to post the confirmation) and therefore the system tries to add another accounting line which results in the invalid  error message 'Total of percentages...'.
    To rectify this behaviour, you can either:
    - implement the BADI BBP_ACCCAT_MAP_IMP and when you receive the
    ERP account category 'V', a customer specific business logic can be implemented to correctly identify 'Z_CC1' SRM account category. Similar mapping logic has to implemented for other categories as well.
    OR
    - you could add the account category 'CC' to the organization attribute 'KNT' for user 'hotline1' using transaction ppoma_bbp. The user can later on modify the account category manually in the account assignment tab.
    Let me know if you have any further questions.
    Best regards,
    Raghavendra.

  • Schedule lines not covering  the total order Quantity

    We have an issue  with Schedule lines
    Order created on  19-02-201
    Material =M
    Requirement type =KSV
    Order Quantity =2500
    Delivered Quantity=1700
    Schedule Lines
    Date               Order quantity       Confirmed Quantity        Delivered  Quantity
    19-02-2010     801                                        0
    19-03-210       500                                        0
    16-04-2010      500                                    500                                       500
    14-05-2010      500                                    0
    15-06-2010     0                                        500                                        500
    15-06-2010      0                                        500                                        500
    18-06-2010      200                                   200                                         200
    Item  Status
               Processing Status
                                         Overall status=Completed
                                         Delivery Status= Fully Delivered
    1)Even though we have not delivered the total Order Quantity 2500,Delivery Staus is Fully Delivered Why?
    2)Why the system not created SCHEDULE LINES for the remaining Order Quantity  2500-1700=800

    Check if there are still requirements existing for this order on MD04.
    You might also want to check how the availabilty is carried out, whats the replinishment lead time - anything mentioned there. Generally if you take RLT into consideration - then the unfulfilled qty is shown at the end of RLT.
    Not too clear at this moment on the dates you have mentioned, bit hard to read.
    Am curious too, why this is happening.

  • PM Orders whose total actaul quantity is equal to withdrawl quantity

    hello all,
    our requirement is we are generating an ALV  report to show PM Orders whose total actual quantity is equal to total withdrawn quantity...
    i.e it should not display records like below,
    RSNUM     material         BDMNG        SHKZG   ENMNG
    800268591   *****             3                   H                3
    800268591    ****             3                   S                0
    800268591     ***             3                   H                0
    800268591   *****             3                  S                 3
    where as the report should show only records like below...
    RSNUM     material         BDMNG        SHKZG   ENMNG
    8000208770  MTE30001     50                 H           50
    8000208770  MTE30001     50                 S            50
    8000208770  MTO10020     20                 H            20
    8000208770  MTO10020     20                 S            20.
    i.e each material wise i should check this ,
    my code is like below
    loop at it_resb INTO wa_resb.
           if wa_resb-shkzg eq 'H'.
                lv_bdmng1 = lv_bdmng1 + wa_resb-bdmng.
                lv_enmng1 = lv_enmng1 + wa_resb-enmng.
            ELSEIF wa_resb-shkzg eq 'S'.
                lv_enmng2 = lv_enmng2 + wa_resb-enmng.
                lv_bdmng2 = lv_bdmng2 + wa_resb-bdmng.
           endif.
         endloop.
         if lv_bdmng1 eq lv_bdmng2 AND lv_enmng1 eq lv_enmng2.
             if lv_enmng1 ne 0 and lv_enmng2 ne 0.
               APPEND  LINES OF it_resb  to it_resb1.
             endif.
         endif.
       endif.
      endloop.

    clear lv_bdmng1 and lv_bdmng2 in first line inside loop stat.

  • Rounding off Issue (Net Value not equal to Net Price * quantity)

    Dear Gurus,
    Here is an interesting issue.The default calculation done in the pricing procedure is two decimal places.Now we consider a real scneario,consider the net value of 324 quantities of an item calculated is 36,049.86 .When it is divided by quantity  the resulting value of net price is 111.265 but the system shows 111.27 by rounding it off.
    Now here comes the problem,my client needs the rate to be shown on the order script to be two decimal places and the net value should be equal  quantity * net price.So if we apply this,
    324 * 111.27 = 36051.48
    But the net value calculated by the system is 36,049.86.So it can be consluded that:
    "Quantity * Net Price Shown is not Equal to Net Value calculated by the System"
    Need an urgent resolution,project is stuck on this
    Regards,
    Sam Ahmed
    Edited by: Lakshmipathi on Nov 3, 2011 12:14 PM
    Please dont add URGENT in subject or in your post

    Here is the pricing procedure,
    We start with the amount condition types
                                            Unit Price        Units Condition Value
    ZMRP     MRP                     1,700.00           10     PAC     55,080.00      
    ZTRP     Trade Price     1,445.00           10     PAC     46,818.00      
    ZDPR     Dist. Price     1,445.00           10     PAC     46,818.00         (GL)
    Using Trade Price we apply the product discount of 23%
    ZPRD     Product Discount     23.000-     %                    10,768.14-
    Then we send discount amount to the gl by using condition type ZDIS
    ZDIS      Discount Value     100.000-     %           10,768.14-      (GL)
    tHE RESULTING NET VALUE IS  36,049.86      as 46818.00 - 10,768.14
         Order Item value     111.27      1     PAC     36,049.86      
    And the Net Price is 111.27

  • In a purchase order for 3 GR's Quantity does not equal the value

    Hi,
    I have found the difference in one purchase order, there have been 3 GRs where the Qty does not equal the Value.  How has this happened?
    Any guesses why the difference has come.
    Thanks&regards,
    Veena

    Hi Vishal,
    In po history for agt 3 Gr's  Quantity does not equal the values. I hope the difference is Movement types. But exactly where to check this movements i am not getting.
    Can you tell me this which T.code.
    Tx,

  • Showing Booking amount when it does not equal Opportuity Revenue Total

    I there a way to create a report to easily show where the booking amount of an opportunity does not equal the sum of the products in the product revenue section? I tried Sum(Product revenue), can't quite remeber the field name, but that did not work
    Also, we would like to see any opportunity that has no predict revenue associated with it, either in the same report or a different report.
    Thanks

    David,
    The Opportunity-Product subject areas contain both Opportunity Revenue fields and Opportunit-Product Revenue fields. The Opportunity-Product Revenue field located in Columns/Opportunity-Product/Revenue/Revenue will aggregate the total amount of all products for the opportunity. There is no need to SUM this field.
    Build a report and filter it based on a field that calculates the difference between the two revenue columns and you should get your desired list of opportunities.
    Now that you know where the right fields are, you other report should be a simple filter on the appropriate revenue field = 0
    Mike

  • Total Baseline Hours For A Resource Does Not Equal the Sum of the Weekly Baseline Hours for that Resource

    Hi,
    I am using Project Server 2010. I have a project schedule that has been baselined and no actual work has been charged to it. The project has 3 resources. I am in the Resource Usage View. With 2 of the three resources, the hours in the Baseline Work Column
    on the left side of the view do not equal the sum total of weekly hours in the Timephased Grid. For instance, for resource JB the Baseline Work hours column says 1,392. When I total his weekly hours in the timephased grid I get 1368 hours; a variance
    of 24. Resource RS has 794.5 hours in the Baseline Work column but the sum total of his weekly timephased grid hours is 710.5, a variance of 84 hours. In both cases, the sum of the hours in the timephased grid is less than the hours in the Baseline Work column.
    What would be causing this? (I am cutting and pasting the weekly hours in the timephased grid into Excel and using the Excel sum function total).  Is there a better timephased view I should be looking at to try to find the "missing
    hours"? I have seen this before in project and it really has me stumped. Thanks.
    Judy Washington

    Hi Judy,
    I could not reproduce your issue. Is your Project Server patched with the latest SP and CU?
    Also can you reproduce this unexpected behavior with another project?
    Can you split your screen from the resource usage view, display the resource form and click right on the grey part selecting "schedule"? Then you'll have the scheduled start and finish dates for the resource's assignments. This is to be sure that
    you are not missing any parts of the assignments due to a wrong zoom in the timephased grid.
    Hope this helps,
    Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MCP, MCTS |

  • Why resource cost in Oracle does not equal the total on the routing of Usage.

    why resource cost in Oracle does not equal the total on the routing of Usage.

    Hi Judy,
    I could not reproduce your issue. Is your Project Server patched with the latest SP and CU?
    Also can you reproduce this unexpected behavior with another project?
    Can you split your screen from the resource usage view, display the resource form and click right on the grey part selecting "schedule"? Then you'll have the scheduled start and finish dates for the resource's assignments. This is to be sure that
    you are not missing any parts of the assignments due to a wrong zoom in the timephased grid.
    Hope this helps,
    Guillaume Rouyre, MBA, MCP, MCTS |

  • Produciton order status TECO, but WIP is not equal to zero

    Dear Expert,
    In OKGC,
    1000     0     000002     REL     2     WIP Calculation on Basis of Actual Costs
    1000     0     000002     DLV     3     Cancel Data of WIP Calculation and Results Ana
    1000     0     000002     PREL     1     WIP Calculation on Basis of Actual Costs
    *1000     0     000002     TECO     4     Cancel Data of WIP Calculation and Results Ana
    We checked produciton order status TECO (CO03)
    but WIP is not equal to zero (KKAO)
    Also, we found production order status show "rel" status in KKAO.
    Why order status in CO03 is TECO, but show "REL" in KKAO?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
    We also had similar issue that the WIP is not equal to zero even though the status of the Process Order is DLV/TECO. When we analyzed, we found that few of the operations/resources/activityeps are not yet confirmed in the same month for the order. These operations/resources/activityeps are confirmed in subsequent month, then WIP got automatically Zero.
    Also refer the SAP Note 530563 - WIP calculation: Status DLV and TECO. Which provide the details for how WIP will get calculated.
    Thanks & regards,
    ADI

  • How to calculate total stock quantity in cube

    Dear Master
        I want to verify the data between BI report and cube whether correct or not.My report name is stock summary. It's giving report for Total quantity stock (0TOTALSTCK) for paricular date. This KF(0TOTALSTCK) inflow is 0RECTOTSTCK and outflow is 0ISSTOTSTCK. Somebody telling to get the Total quantity stock (0TOTALSTCK) value, I have to use following formula 0RECVS_VAL (Value Received into Valuated Stock) - 0ISSVS_VAL (Value issued from valuated stock). Please advice me which formula should I use to get the total stock quantity?.
    Thanks a lot in advance
    Raja

    Please let met understand better, you have the following keyfigures:
    - Receipts (Cumulative)
    - Issues (Cumulative)
    - Difference (Cumulative) populated during URules = Receipts - Issues (any routine with elaborated calculation behind?
    - Stock (non-cumulative InFlow = Receipts, OutFlow = Issues)...
    Is this correct?
    Olivier.

  • HOW TO BLOCK DELIVERY OF GOODS WHICH ARE NOT EQUAL TO SALES ORDER

    Hi,
    I want to block user to create any sales invoice for some customers based on  sales order where quantity in sales order is not equal to invoice.
    Thanks,
    Anitha

    Hi Anitha,
    You can do this by selecting check marks on two field under BP Master data >>Payment Terms
    1) Allow Partial Delivery of Sales Order
    2) Allow Partial Delivery per row.
    Thanks,
    Regards,
    Sudhir

  • Delivery cost is not equal to actual cost in sales order

    I met a strange phenomenon is the sale cost in SO is not equal to the cost in delivery order.
    I order 3 PCS material and each cost is 43.87 and the total cost is 131.61.
    However when I finished PGI the FI document shows the cost is 131.62. the diff is 0.01
    I don't know how the diff comes.
    Do you know the reason for the above issue?
    Thank you very much for your help.
    Yang

    have you checked whether there are different pricing conditions?
    in Sales order, the price is calculated based on the pricing date in the order, if you then create a new delivery, the price is re-calculated with the delivery date, but the sales order still has the old pricing information.
    Check the pricing log of the sales order and invoice (tab "conditions") to see, which pricing condition is used.
    Or is it possible that your order uses a foreign currency? SO maybe the exchange rate has changed since creating the order.
    Regards
    Ralf

Maybe you are looking for