Total Payments on Payslip incorrect during retro
Hi All
Scenario 1 - Backdated starter
Employee has started in 01.04.2010 updated on the system in 01.05.2010.
May pay run retros for April and May.
/101 = Basic pay for April 2010 + Basic Pay for May 2010
/552 = Basic pay for April 2010
Scenario 2
Retro on WT 2525
Employee record has a retrospective payment against WT 2525
May pay run retros for April and May.
/101 = Includes the 2525 payment for May 2010 only { i want it to be Includes the 2525 payment for April 2010 + May 2010 }
/552 = 2525 payment for April 2010
I am deriving my total payments from /101 for payslip
for which I need Scenario 2 to work the same way as Scenario 1.
How do I acheive it?
I have tried on Wage type characteristics for 2525 Evaluation Class "Wage types for Payroll Journal" set to 01 "WT Flows into Total Gross". This does not work.
Note: I use HRFORMS not PE51
Many Thanks
Sriram
I am not sure why in your sceniaro /101 is the sum of April + May. Typically, /101 is for current period only and /552 for retro difference. So the total payment is alway /101 + /552
Similar Messages
-
1. Retainage of certain amount of Total payment to be made to vendor
Hi gurus
can someone help me to configure the below scenario please
1. Retainage of certain amount of Total payment to be made to vendor
ThanksDear Lakshmi,
Retention money is that part of the invoice of a vendor, which is not paid to the vendor until some pre agreed conditions are satisfied.
For example, a vendor may suppy a machinery and as per the terms, 90% of the amount would be paid and the remaining 10% would be paid say after 6 months after satisfactory commissioning of the machinery.
The retention money concept is used in Accounts Payable and can be configured with the help of "terms of payment"
You can use the Terms of payment to acheive this requirement.
Go to Transaction code OBB8. Create a new terms of payment say Z001, which has the "Installment Payment" ticked.
Now create two more terms of payment Z002 and Z003. Here mark the "Payment Block" (A or B) for the terms of payment Z003.
Now go to OBB9, fill as below
Z001----- 170-----Z002
Z001--230-----Z003.
Now at the PO stage, make sure that the terms of payment is Z001.
At the stage of the invoice verification, the entry would be
Expense A/c Dr 1000
To Vendor A/c 700
To Vendor A/c 300 ( This would be with a payment block)
At the time of automatic payment, this Rs.300/- will not be selected unless we remove the payment block.
Regards
Venkatesh
PS: Assign points if useful -
Retainage of certain amount of Total payment to be made to vendor
Hi MM gurus
I need to configure with the below requirement, can someone through light on it please
1. Retainage of certain amount of Total payment to be made to vendor
2. Separate Tax ID for VendorDear Lakshmi,
Retention money is that part of the invoice of a vendor, which is not paid to the vendor until some pre agreed conditions are satisfied.
For example, a vendor may suppy a machinery and as per the terms, 90% of the amount would be paid and the remaining 10% would be paid say after 6 months after satisfactory commissioning of the machinery.
The retention money concept is used in Accounts Payable and can be configured with the help of "terms of payment"
You can use the Terms of payment to acheive this requirement.
Go to Transaction code OBB8. Create a new terms of payment say Z001, which has the "Installment Payment" ticked.
Now create two more terms of payment Z002 and Z003. Here mark the "Payment Block" (A or B) for the terms of payment Z003.
Now go to OBB9, fill as below
Z001----- 170-----Z002
Z001--230-----Z003.
Now at the PO stage, make sure that the terms of payment is Z001.
At the stage of the invoice verification, the entry would be
Expense A/c Dr 1000
To Vendor A/c 700
To Vendor A/c 300 ( This would be with a payment block)
At the time of automatic payment, this Rs.300/- will not be selected unless we remove the payment block.
Regards
Venkatesh
PS: Assign points if useful -
Report which has to provide me the total payments made to Vendors.
Hello All,
I am looking for a report which has to provide me the total payments made to the vendors for a specified period.
Some one please help.I have tried with FBL1N but of no use.
Thanks,
BalaHI
B K
You can directly go to
-Easy access screen
-Accounting
-Financial accounting
-Account payable
-Information system
-Reports for Accounts Payable Accounting
-Vendor Balances
-Transaction Figures: Account Balance (S_ALR_87012079)
enter collowing fields
Vendor acc ---
company code--
fiscal year -
select execute button
triadhnaidu .a
Edited by: trinadhrao althi on Oct 7, 2008 11:38 AM -
Total payment due calculations in PO
Hi,
Can anyone tell about the calculations involved in total payment due,tax,freight, discount and total before discount in PO?
waiting for ur hopeful answers.......Hi Chindu,
You can find the
Total payment due in OPOR table (DocTotal)
Tax : suppose you want only TAX amount then please reffer OPOR table (i.e VatSum)
And you want full details about TAX then reffer POR12
table.
Freight : suppose you want only Freight amount then please reffer OPOR table (i.e TotalExpFC)
And you want full details about TAX then reffer POR2 &
POR3 table.
discount: suppose you want only Discount Percentage then please reffer OPOR table (i.e DiscPrcnt)
And supoose wnat amount the OPOR table (i.e DiscSum)
total before discount : in OPOR table
Regards
Kamlesh Naware -
Any tcode in sap to show total payment (cash out) by year
Gurus,
Any tcode in SAP to show total payment (cash out) by year or by date range in summary form. Instead of using FBL1N, any other reports available?Dear Paul
Try this t-code S_P99_41000099.
Warm Regards
Krishna
Edited by: krishmenth on Apr 13, 2010 9:00 AM
Edited by: krishmenth on Apr 13, 2010 9:05 AM -
cancelled debit card associated with my itunes account, recently redeemed a $50 gift card and used about $40 halfway through downloading the purchases a message appeared saying incorrect payment information. I all the purchases can be downloaded for free but it asks me to sign in and i hit the sane wall saying payment information is incorrect. i tried removing cancelled debit card from billing information but i can not find the "none" option when i click edit. any help would be appreciated.
Hey there jappwno,
It sounds like you are unable to select None as a payment method in your iTunes account. The following article may help you determine why this is the case:
Why can’t I select None when I edit my payment information?
http://support.apple.com/kb/ts5366
Thank you for using Apple Support Communities.
Regards,
Sterling -
Transferring the additional hours to current period during retro run
Hi Experts,
We are have Pension contribution plan in 0169 where wage type 9XXX that takes in total hours from /229 via custom PCR. . Then the hours are multiplied by a constant stored in table T511K. The problem is that suppose we have created a record for hours in IT 2010 for some previous period during the current run and want to reflect that change with the a retro run. i.e 97XX should take in hours from /229 in the current period plus those additional hours give in some previous period and reflect the same in the current period. And this not happening.
E.g. In for period 04 say, we want the hours also that have in given additionally for in period 02. We have checked tables V_51P6_B as well as V_51P6_C for 9XXX and it's OK.
Are we missing something here?Like other deductions (other than taxes), retroactive changes to the deduction amount should be carried forward to the current pay through tables DDNTK and ARRRS, since you can't change the Net Pay Amount of the previous pay.
For retroactive changes to Payments, such as hours recorded in IT2010, the payment calculation will usually happen in the retroactive pay, Staturory Deductions (such as Income Tax) will be calculated and the resulting change in net income will be carried forward to the current pay.
If the current calculation does not meet your requirements, you probably need to create a few PCRs to work around the problem.
If possible, any variation in the value of /229 should be carried forwart to the current pay (through Output and Input WTs) before function P0169.
The alternative would be to create a series of PCRs before and after that function so that the retroactive pay would always use the original value of /229 (without changing it's value in RT) and that the current pay's value of /229 would be modified temporarily to reflect the retroactive changes (without changing it's value in RT). -
F110 - Payments not picked up during first run
I executed payment run value dated as at 26.02.07 some error had occured.
At first I've created one ID(A) witth 66 payments.However, after I check the payments there were actually still invoices not paid for that day. Hence, I perform another run with the same parameters and it has captured another 7 payments that were due under ID(B). FYI, this happened almost everytime I run the payments during end of the month as we will scoop up invoices due further than normal scoop up date. For this case, we have scoop up the documents until the end of March.I've checked the exception list for ID(A) and those invoice in ID(B) weren't in ID(A).
I've performed test run in the training environment and found that the 7paymnets(vendors) genereted error number 7 via the exception list.exception log -
Date Time Message MsgID/No./Ty
07.03.2007 10:09:48 Information re. vendor 136546 / paying company code PH01 ... FZ 305 S
07.03.2007 10:09:48 ... payment not possible because of reported error FZ 311 S
07.03.2007 10:09:49 Due items with currency PHP, pmnt method O - items total is > 0 FZ 328 S
07.03.2007 10:09:51 Information re. vendor 136583 / paying company code PH01 ... FZ 305 S
07.03.2007 10:09:51 ... payment not possible because of reported error FZ 311 S
07.03.2007 10:09:51 Error from interface KI-222: Cost center MY01/100100 does n ot exist on 26.02.2007. FZ 354 S
07.03.2007 10:09:51 Information re. vendor 136646 / paying company code PH01 ... FZ 305 S
07.03.2007 10:09:51 ... payment not possible because of reported error FZ 311 S
07.03.2007 10:09:52 Error from interface KI-222: Cost center MY01/100100 does n ot exist on 26.02.2007. FZ 354 S
07.03.2007 10:09:56 Information re. vendor 136866 / paying company code PH01 ... FZ 305 S
07.03.2007 10:09:56 ... payment not possible because of reported error FZ 311 S
07.03.2007 10:09:56 Error from interface KI-222: Cost center MY01/100100 does n ot exist on 26.02.2007. FZ 354 S
Exception list with error message
Shell Philippines Expl BV Payment proposal list for proposal run 26.02.2007/PH005 / 02:39:05
Muntinlupa
Company code: PH01
Vendor 0000136546
PAN PACIFIC INDUSTRIAL SALES CO,
INC.
PANPISCO BUILDING, 246 ESCOLTA ST.
1006 MANILA
PHILIPPINEN
Exception No payment
PH01 5100013065 RE 19.01.2007 22.01.2007 Z30 31 -14,410.17 0 -14,410.17 PHP 7
PH01 5100013109 RE 06.01.2007 31.01.2007 Z30 31 -8,503.39 0 -8,503.39 PHP 7
PH01 5100013152 RE 31.01.2007 02.02.2007 Z30 31 -475.71 0 -475.71 PHP 7
PH01 5100013153 RE 31.01.2007 02.02.2007 Z30 31 -9,811.60 0 -9,811.60 PHP 7
PH01 5100013186 RE 31.01.2007 02.02.2007 Z30 31 -8,503.39 0 -8,503.39 PHP 7
Vendor 0000136583
SUPPLY OILFIELD SERVICES, INC.
SALCEDO VILLAGE
20F PEALBANK CENTER 146 VALERO ST.
MAKATI
PHILIPPINEN
Exception No payment
PH01 5100012916 RE 19.01.2007 26.01.2007 Z30 31 -3,399.00 0 -3,399.00 PHP 7
PH01 5100013117 RE 22.01.2007 06.02.2007 Z30 31 -79,067.10 0 -79,067.10 PHP 7
PH01 5100013165 RE 11.01.2007 18.01.2007 Z30 31 -9,090.64 0 -9,090.64 PHP 7
PH01 5100013168 RE 10.01.2007 18.01.2007 Z30 31 -9,822.65 0 -9,822.65 PHP 7
PH01 5100013169 RE 11.01.2007 18.01.2007 Z30 31 -13,309.99 0 -13,309.99 PHP 7
PH01 5100013170 RE 11.01.2007 18.01.2007 Z30 31 -121,200.00 0 -121,200.00 PHP 7
PH01 5100013171 RE 11.01.2007 18.01.2007 Z30 31 -27,905.60 0 -27,905.60 PHP 7
PH01 5100013172 RE 11.01.2007 18.01.2007 Z30 31 -19,867.26 0 -19,867.26 PHP 7
PH01 5100013173 RE 12.01.2007 18.01.2007 Z30 31 -6,385.16 0 -6,385.16 PHP 7
PH01 5100013174 RE 12.01.2007 18.01.2007 Z30 31 -52,770.00 0 -52,770.00 PHP 7
PH01 5100013175 RE 12.01.2007 18.01.2007 Z30 31 -4,144.19 0 -4,144.19 PHP 7
PH01 5100013176 RE 11.01.2007 23.01.2007 Z30 31 -3,563.00 0 -3,563.00 PHP 7
PH01 5100013178 RE 11.01.2007 23.01.2007 Z30 31 -142,673.78 0 -142,673.78 PHP 7
PH01 5100013181 RE 12.01.2007 18.01.2007 Z30 31 -38,326.59 0 -38,326.59 PHP 7
PH01 5100013182 RE 12.01.2007 18.01.2007 Z30 31 -4,637.51 0 -4,637.51 PHP 7
PH01 5100013191 RE 22.01.2007 06.02.2007 Z30 31 -10,499.00 0 -10,499.00 PHP 7
Vendor 0000136646
DESCO INCORPORATED
WEST SERVICE ROAD
KM 21 VILONCO RD.
MUNTINLUPA CITY
PHILIPPINEN
Exception No payment
PH01 5100012958 RE 27.01.2007 29.01.2007 Z30 31 -90,413.18 0 -90,413.18 PHP 7
PH01 5100012959 RE 27.01.2007 29.01.2007 Z30 31 -242,707.50 0 -242,707.50 PHP 7
Vendor 0000136866
BUSINESS PROCESS OUTSOURCING INT.
INC.
6758 AYALA AVE,
1226 MAKATI CITY
PHILIPPINEN
Exception No payment
PH01 5100013146 RE 05.02.2007 06.02.2007 Z30 31 -132,450.88 0 -132,450.88 PHP 7
PH01 5100013147 RE 05.02.2007 06.02.2007 Z30 31 -73,633.94 0 -73,633.94 PHP 7
PH01 5100013150 RE 05.02.2007 06.02.2007 Z30 31 -73,633.94 0 -73,633.94 PHP 7
PH01 5100013166 RE 05.02.2007 06.02.2007 Z30 31 -239,084.79 0 -239,084.79 PHP 7
Error
001 No pymt possible because items with a debit bal.still exist; see job log
002 Item is blocked for payment
006 No valid payment method found
007 Error in creating the payment document; read job log -
FLB2- Payment Applied to Incorrect Customer
Hi,
During FLB2 upload, the payment is applied to incorrect customer B than what it should apply based on customer A's bank details. Upon investigation, it was known that the lockbox file contains wrong invoice # which accidently belongs to customer B. Moreover, there is NO bank details maintained for customer B.
Now, my question is-
1) Does the Invoice # supercede the bank details of customer during FLB2 upload?
2) What if in above case, I maintain the bank details for customer B. Will it then go "On Account" to Customer A coz it had not found the correct invoice #, or it will still try to apply to customer B?
Thanks in advance for your help,
NiravContact Facebook.
-
SEM BCS V6.03SP4 - COI - Total divestiture - transaction type incorrect
Hi,
I want to manage the activity total divestiture (N°11)
When I executed the task COI, the system for items and balance is correct but for the transaction type is incorrect.
Indeed, for the company who sells the investment , the system uses the OPENING FLOW (001 - F00) !
Do you now how to manage this correction in order to have the divestiture flow ?
NB : I don't see the SAP notes for this correction
Thanks by advance
BastienFYI
I applied the sap notes 1742121 and 134940
The transaction type is correct for earning item
But for investment item , we have already the opening transaction type!
Reminder opening code
001 for standard BCS
M01 with preconfiguration IFRS
F00 with BFc codification
Bastien -
Grands totals for % Columns coming incorrect in pivot view .
Hello ,
I have the below scenario . Iam trying to get the calculated grand total for % column . I tired several ways ...like report aggregates enabled in instanceconfig,tried creating cal colum using physical columns as well as logical columns in RPD , changing the aggregation rule. The row wise values (%) are coming correct but iam unable to get correct % grand total (36.8%) instead iam just getting the sum of the % total ( 83.3%) . I have tried the above options in my previous reports and those conditions work perfectly right but for this report they are not able to . kindly please let me know if anybody has a solution for this issue .
Department ...USD CAD Variance (USD/CAD)*100
XYZ 10 20 50%
ABC 25 75 33.3%
Total 35 95 36.8% ( 35/95)
Thanks
KarthikJust to cross check
Do you have following tag in your instanceconfig file ? if its not there then you may encounter grand total incorrect calculations.
<ReportAggregateEnabled>true</ReportAggregateEnabled> -
Total of In stock showing during AR transactions
Dear experts
May I know how to show In stock total for individual warehouse instead the lump sum total of In stock during AR transactions?
e.g.
Item A
100 units in Warehouse 1
200 units in warehouse 2
during AR transaction, e.g. Sales Order, when I choose Warehouse 1for Item A, it should show total of 100 units instead of 300 units at In Stock at the line item.
Please advice so that the system can show the In stock total correctly based on each warehouse during AR transaction?
Thanks in advance
Regards,
Catea k.You can use this FS
SELECT T0.[OnHand] FROM OITW T0
WHERE T0.[ItemCode]=$[$38.1]
and T0.[WhsCode]=$[$38.24]
on a UDF setting autorefresh when exiting altered column WHSE. -
SSL peer shut down incorrectly during synchronization
Why during synchronization process, particularly when downloading the war file I get this message? Is there a timeout connection to set?
The entire app war is about 6mb. At downloading point, the interrupt occurs when the war file reaches 3 or 4 mb.
The downloading bit rate is about 30KBps.
I use a wireless connection for my device, but the behavior is the same using a wired connection.
An Exception (javax.net.ssl.SSLException) occurred while http-get: SSL peer shut down incorrectly
[20070327 14:14:45:994] D [MI/API/Sync ] SyncEventListener com.sap.ip.me.core.RegistryInboundProcessingLog$RegistryInboundProcessingLogSyncEventListener@78dc4c was registered for key com.sap.ip.me.core.RegistryInboundProcessingLog$RegistryInboundProcessingLogSyncEventListener/MI2853484152454429
[20070327 14:14:45:994] E [AppLog/MI/Deployment ] Exception while trying to install application DSA_MOBILE_CLIENT_0_9_26
com.sap.ip.me.core.InstallationException: Cannot download installation file
at com.sap.ip.me.core.JspApplicationType.downloadInstallationFile(JspApplicationType.java:387)
at com.sap.ip.me.core.JspApplicationType.install(JspApplicationType.java:56)
at com.sap.ip.me.core.ApplicationManager.installApplication(ApplicationManager.java:763)
at com.sapmarkets.web.liTS.util.reg.RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.installApplicationFromMSD(RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.java:898)
at com.sapmarkets.web.liTS.util.reg.RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.installMSDs(RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.java:868)
at com.sapmarkets.web.liTS.util.reg.RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.startApplicationInstallation(RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.java:836)
at com.sapmarkets.web.liTS.util.reg.RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.startInstallationViaMSD(RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.java:416)
at com.sapmarkets.web.liTS.util.reg.RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.process(RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.java:194)
at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.processSingleContainer(SyncManagerImpl.java:175)
at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerMerger.processInboundContainers(SyncManagerMerger.java:168)
at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.processSyncCycle(SyncManagerImpl.java:898)
at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.syncForUser(SyncManagerImpl.java:1340)
at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.processSynchronization(SyncManagerImpl.java:971)
at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.synchronizeWithBackend(SyncManagerImpl.java:463)
at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.synchronizeWithBackend(SyncManagerImpl.java:319)
at com.sap.ip.me.api.sync.SyncManager.synchronizeWithBackend(SyncManager.java:79)
at com.sap.ip.me.apps.jsp.Home$SyncRunnable.run(Home.java:641)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)
[20070327 14:14:45:994] E [MI/Deployment ] com.sap.ip.me.core.InstallationException: Cannot download installation file
com.sap.ip.me.core.InstallationException: Cannot download installation file
at com.sap.ip.me.core.JspApplicationType.downloadInstallationFile(JspApplicationType.java:387)
at com.sap.ip.me.core.JspApplicationType.install(JspApplicationType.java:56)
at com.sap.ip.me.core.ApplicationManager.installApplication(ApplicationManager.java:763)
at com.sapmarkets.web.liTS.util.reg.RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.installApplicationFromMSD(RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.java:898)
at com.sapmarkets.web.liTS.util.reg.RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.installMSDs(RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.java:868)
at com.sapmarkets.web.liTS.util.reg.RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.startApplicationInstallation(RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.java:836)
at com.sapmarkets.web.liTS.util.reg.RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.startInstallationViaMSD(RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.java:416)
at com.sapmarkets.web.liTS.util.reg.RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.process(RegistrySyncInboundProcessing.java:194)
at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.processSingleContainer(SyncManagerImpl.java:175)
at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerMerger.processInboundContainers(SyncManagerMerger.java:168)
at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.processSyncCycle(SyncManagerImpl.java:898)
at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.syncForUser(SyncManagerImpl.java:1340)
at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.processSynchronization(SyncManagerImpl.java:971)
at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.synchronizeWithBackend(SyncManagerImpl.java:463)
at com.sap.ip.me.sync.SyncManagerImpl.synchronizeWithBackend(SyncManagerImpl.java:319)
at com.sap.ip.me.api.sync.SyncManager.synchronizeWithBackend(SyncManager.java:79)
at com.sap.ip.me.apps.jsp.Home$SyncRunnable.run(Home.java:641)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:534)hi alex,
are you downloading the apps thru ssl? your ssl server might have a timeout...
you can check on your server settings for this. or you can try placing your app
in an http server. if you are using a proxy server, might need to check on the
timeout settings as well.
regards
jo -
Re: Arrears is getting formed twice during retro run
Hi Team,
Request your Kind help urgently.
In one of my support client I am facing a problem with deduction Wage type.
Scenario is: An employee is eligible to purchase the company share up to 10% .
- The eligibility will be maintained in I T14 with a wagetype using %
- It will calculate on 10% of basic every month and share will be deducted from his pay.
- But if any Loss of pay is there it will calculate as per is working days.
For example,
- In case of changes in the basic in the month of May which is updated in the month of July, when you run the July payroll from payroll driver is running retro for both period that is May to July and gives the output correctly.
And executed the regular payroll until December.
But in January when updated IT0581 from 01/04/2010 to 31/12/9999, here when you run the January payroll run, again share purchase amount is getting calculated (twice) which should not happened, since share purchase has already calculated in the month of July(May to July) and the same amount is deducted (twice)
The calculation is happening when process of arrears is formed
Please let me know how can I stop system calculating twice share purchase. Should I write any rule or something else can be done.
Thanks & Exepcting your help
VidyaCould this help you friend:
If you whish the payroll system only to evaluate certain aspect of the payroll in orginal period then in the particular payroll scheme where it is evaluted add an IF statement in Function and the "O" value in the PAR2, next line to process your PCR and ENDIF statement after that.
So if period is orginal then evaluate whatever. Else. Read from previous result. Endif.
Greetz.
Maybe you are looking for
-
How do you change the opacity of a button when it is rolled over?
I have the button created i am not trying to change the background or anything. I wanted to know how do you change the opacity for the over state of a button? by the default i have it set to 70% opacity i want to change the over state to 100%
-
Hi guys , I have an issue in APD . I have created a new APD with a Query as source and an Application file as the data target . (In between , I have various filters , sorts, etc) After succesfully executing this APD , the log which appears does not s
-
Time machine doesn't delete old backups when disk is full
TM disk is 750GB. It tells me there is not enough room for backup-then I look into TM and find there ARE NO BACKUPS anymore. (There were a few days ago.) All backups are gone, except for one two days ago, which was when I began getting the "no room"
-
More photos in settings than photos app shows
After updating to IOS8 my 5c says that I have 368 photos when I look at my storage in settings but when I go to the photos app it says I only have 155 photos. I've deleted pictures to try to bring the 368 number down but I don't know what else to do.
-
Customer Fact Sheet - ERP_SALES_ORDER
Hi all, Another friend doubt.... We need a complete fact Sheet based on data from ERP_Sales_Order. Because we can't tracking prices, sales orders, historical data, and we believe is because the use of ERP_Sales_Order. Pls, any help? Tks for all.