Trading parner chage

Hi Friends
We are unable to clear the following FI documents : xxxxxxxxx1 and xxxxxxxxx2 in Company code: SE05..as they are posted with different trading partner...note: the Invoice was posted in the month of Febrauary-2011 & credit for the same invoice was posted in April - 2011...The Trading partner was changed for the Vendor 20 in Master Data level on 11.04.2011...whichh results in two different TP for related document (Invocie & Credit)....Kindly assist us in clearing this two FI documents...........
can you please suggest me the resollution.
regards
Sagar.

Dear,
SAP blocks change mode for some fields like company code, posting date, currency . Trading partner (VBUND) when a document has been posted with them. Reverse the invoice posted earlier and reinvoice it with the correct trading partner. Please note that this reversal solution is feasible only if you have not posted Bank reconciliation statement for that payment.
Regards

Similar Messages

Vendor, trading parner, authorization and corporate group

Hi experts!
Thank you for pay attention to my message! I have a question about the fields in customer master date.
What does it mean or what will happen to the customer master if I entry a vendor no. or a company ID for trading partner in the field vendor, trading parner, authorization and corporate group in the customer master general data?
In other words, in which business scenario or situation should I entry data in these fields:
vendor, trading parner, authorization and corporate group in the customer master general data?
Thank you for your help!
TangDark.

Hi,
Vendor- when the customer is also a vendor( i.e. supplying any form of product- raw material) you need to enter vendor no.
Trading partner- If this customer is trading with other company code of the same client.
Authorization- To protect access of the data maintained
Corporate group- If customer belongs to a group ,maintain group key here.
Thanks,
Vrajesh

Trading Parner Not Inherited to Cross Company Balance Sheet Line item

Hi,
I posted cross company document using document type that is already untick in field 'inter-company posting' and 'enter tpid'.
My accounting entries is as per below:
   Co1000   Cr Balance Sheet   $250
   Co1001   Dr Expense            $10
   Co1001   Dr Expense            $240
Upon posting, TPID only populated in the cross-company code clearing line item only. Not to all of the GL line item.
However;
1) If using the same set of data (cross company posting) whereby the Balance Sheet line is replaced with P&L account, the posted document will inherit TPID to all line item.
2) If posting in single company's book, using related party customer account with the same balance sheet as per example above, TPID is inherited to the BS line item. example is as per below:
     Co1000 Dr Customer1001   $300
     Co1000 Cr balance Sheet    $300
Is there any reason or notes that can be implemented so that for cross company transaction that contains BS account, TPID is being populated in all line item?
TQ.

Hi,
If the Trading Partner is maintained in OX16 and you are still getting this problem then, please refer to OSS Note No.:779844 and 438076.
Regards,
Kiron Kumar T.

Trading partner removel and its effects

My client has this scenario they want to see if they remove trading parner from the config what will be the effect of that, so i have these questions. I will appriciate if some one can guide me on this.
1 If we remove trading partner what will be the effect on standard intercompany postings, intercompany clearing, logistics posting.
2 Need a background of why trading partner is used. How trading partner is used in consolidation.
3 If trading partner is removed how we are going to clear the older invoices, effect on open items, purchase order, sales order.
4 If trading partner is removed what will be the effect on reporting, impact on payment processing.
Thanks
Krishna

Hi,
1) Such transactions will no longer be identfiable as intercompany.
2) In a consolidation, all legal entities are treated as a single entity.(simple explanation) Hence any sales/purchases have to be eliminated which are between the entities involved
3) Old invoices can be cleared, the document types will have to permit mixed Trading partners in the document (Blank+ what was in the old document)
4) PAyment processing - no effect.
Reporting - Reconciling and identifying intercompany transaction will no longer be possible via SAP. This would have to be done outside of the system.
Kind regards

Trading Partner Offline

Sometimes Trading Parntners may go off-line during maintenance windows. Does B2B provide any feature where all the outbound messages for the Offline Trading parner can be parked aside . Finally when the Trading Parner goes online, parked outbound messages must be sent.

There is a feature Scheduled TP Downtime. You can set the start time and endtime as per the downtime.
Below is the more details:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E17904_01/integration.1111/e10229/b2b_tpdowntime.htm#CACIDJDJ
The downtime can be initiated by command line also:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E17904_01/integration.1111/e10229/scrpt_imp_exp_dep.htm#CEGHCEEB
Let us know if you want more information.
Rgds,
Nitesh Jain
[email protected]

F110-Netting issue

Hi Gurus,
We are running the payment in app thru netting.we are facing the problem with 2 duns related trading partner 607,610 invoices.in APP we are getting error(error in creating the payment document) in payment propsal i.e,error code 007 for payment proposal.these two vendors having the invoices thru PO,GR,IR.suppose vendor name say 'X"these "x" has trading parner 607.for this GR it is picking the same trading partner 607.But IR picking another trading partner.i.e561.i think it is picking up from the plant instead of that vendor.is the difference b/n the trading partners of GR,IR Causes this error.
Thanks&Regards
Jana

Hi:
Before customer & vendor open line items get nullifed.
You have to do the following in the customer and vendor master master.
In customer master, mention the vendor no in control data tab.
in vendor master.mention the customer no in account control.
Use T.code FBL1N - Display/Change Line Items to check the balances .check the customer items check box in this report. you will able to see the remaining balance of both customer and vendor.
Then use the F110.
Please let me know if you need more information.
Assign points if useful.
Regards
Sridhar M

ICR - Manual Reconciliation

Dear ICR Experts,
When on the manual reconciliation step for ICR, the trading partner open items are not showing up in the top right quadrant of the screen. I assume this should be happening as the tree on the left knows the CompanyCode and Trading partners. Is there a setting I need to click in order to have comparable lists, or is there another explaination for the missing list of trading parner unassigned open items?
Take a look at the screenshot here: http://img594.imageshack.us/img594/5490/reconciledocumentsmanua.jpg
Thanks,
John Scime

Hello John,
When you run data selection for company 10 what are the results? The log will tell you how many intercompany open items it found for this company. If there are none then you should check whether the company ID is correct and whether the RFC destination is correct.
If data selection does transfer open items then check the log of automatic assignment. Maybe there are some issues there.
If data selection did transfer something you can view the data records in the ICR database using the auxiliary program List of Documents. You can reach the program through the pushbutton Auxiliary Programs on the bottom of the selection screen of any of the three ICR transactions you are using (just to get the complete picture: which process did you set up)?
HTH,
Ralph

Use of partner assignement fields

Hi,
I would like to know the 'real' use of partner assignment fields. For instance, we could focus on the 'partner segment' field (the field segment is used as recommended in the standard: the segment is both the SAP field and the IFRS notion of business segment):
Use 1) the partner fields are storing the information of the trading parner : the 'partner segment' is the 'segment' of the 'trading partner'. This is useful when doing preconsolidation routines such as intercompany reconciliation : we reconcile data from company A Segment X with trading partner B partner segment Y
Use 2) the partner fields are storing the historical value of the allocated fields: e.g. when segment 99_TBD is allocated to segment 01, the partner segment field is used to store on line item the relationship between segment 99_TBD and segment 01.
This is useful to track the origin of the data flow for allocations (and for clearing account in document splitting)
Thank you for helping me!
Bernard
Edited by: Bernard Frédéric on Oct 2, 2009 3:28 PM

Business example
Those 2 uses of partner fields are not conciliable : here is a example that shows this inconsistency :
I have a relationship between two companies. On one company, the segment has to be allocated. I have to reconcile data by company code and segment.
Here is the posting in the company where its segment has to be allocated (from 99_TBD to 01):
Company A / Segment 99_TBD / Trading partner B / Partner segment 06 100
I would like to allocate segment 99_TBD to segment 01, so I would expect the following intercompany posting:
Company A / Segment 99_TBD / Trading partner B / Partner segment 06 (100)
Company A / Segment 01         / Trading partner B / Partner segment 06    100
=> Thus, the intercompany positions are:
Company A / Segment 01         / Trading partner B / Partner segment 06    100
This is the result I expected
But when running the allocation cycle, the following is the posted:
Company A / Segment 99_TBD / Trading partner B / Partner segment 01            (100)
Company A / Segment 01         / Trading partner B / Partner segment 99_TBD     100
=> Thus, the intercompany positions are:
Company A / Segment 99_TBD / Trading partner B / Partner segment 06             100
Company A / Segment 99_TBD / Trading partner B / Partner segment 01            (100)
Company A / Segment 01         / Trading partner B / Partner segment 99_TBD     100
This not what is expected: the allocation of company A should have no impact on the segment of company B
Can you help me understand this? How the field partner segment should be used?
Thanks

EDI Advanced Batching

Hi All,
We have a requirement to Batch HIPAA 834 Document Type messages. We are using differed batch (ACTION_NAME = D:BatchID:Count:TimeOut) and need to batch large number of messages together(On a peak load expected messages can be around 30000 in the XML) in to one EDI file. XML will be around 150 MB, So we decided to dived the XML in to smaller chunks around 8 to 10MB(Each file having around 1500 messages) for BPEL to processes smoothly. Each divided File will be processed in Separate Instance and with same batch ID to generate one EDI file with multiple ST SE segments in one ISA segment. We should not send the EDI file even if one instance fails due to some error. Currently what ever the messages reached the B2B are being batched in the specified time Interval. So to be simple, Is it possible to instruct B2B not send an EDI file if Count does not match in the Specified time Interval? Any thoughts how to achieve this? If any message fails in b2b level, we are using b2b.outboundOneErrorAllError property for not sending partial file. We are using B2B 11.1.1.7.
Thanks in Advance!!

Just ran a simple test in development (which I beleive has PS5 installed). Below are the App Messages produced from my two documents.
App Message property {MSG_ID=2d343332343531393731343433353631, DOCTYPE_REVISION=5040, MSG_TYPE=1, FROM_PARTY=Schneider, DOCTYPE_NAME=309, tracking_conversationId=urn:CF2B30800BB011E2BFDD3F57AE9437AC, tracking_ecid=0000JcRoVZh0Vswj8DzW4D1GMUCd04RWhl, JMSXDeliveryCount=1, tracking_compositeInstanceId=8360054, tracking_parentComponentInstanceId=bpel:8725125, Sequencing=false, *ACTION_NAME=D:ST302587799:5:4,* TO_PARTY=CanadaCustoms}
App Message property {MSG_ID=33323235323531393137323731303933, DOCTYPE_REVISION=5040, MSG_TYPE=1, FROM_PARTY=Schneider, DOCTYPE_NAME=358, tracking_conversationId=urn:D720D9200BB011E2BFDD3F57AE9437AC, tracking_ecid=0000JcRoVZh0Vswj8DzW4D1GMUCd04RWhl, JMSXDeliveryCount=1, tracking_compositeInstanceId=8360057, tracking_parentComponentInstanceId=bpel:8725130, Sequencing=false, *ACTION_NAME=D:ST302587799:5:4*, TO_PARTY=CanadaCustoms}
Message #1 was created/received at 10/01/2012 05:14:41 AM. It was sent at 10/01/2012 05:18:55 AM.
Message #2 was created/received at 10/01/2012 05:14:54 AM. It was sent at 10/01/2012 05:18:56 AM.
Two different files were created on the FTP Server configured in the agreements, both at 5:18 AM.
ISA*00* *00* *02*SCNN ZZCANC *121001*0518*U*00401*100000073*0*T*\
GS*AQ*SCNN*ACIA8A*20121001*0518*1085*X*005040
ST*309*1091
ISA*00* *00* *02*SCNN ZZCANC *121001*0518*U*00401*100000074*0*T*\
GS*BD*SCNN*ACIA9*20121001*0518*1086*X*005040
ST*358*1092
I believe that I sent everything correctly (batchIds, timeframe, etc), but it still didn't batch them into 1 file/ISA. Is there something else I'm missing?
Do I need to have any additional batching scheduled via the UI for this Trading Parner?

Trading goods as raw materials

Hi friends,
assuming that, in my business we have regular trading goods which are sold. But in some cases we use them for production ( which are actually meant for sales ).
Now, we would have already identified them with material type HAWA.
what are the steps or pre requisites to use them for prodution in SAP. Do i also need to identify that material as ROH. What are the FI effects of this. Because ROH and HAWA have different valuation class.
Thanks in advance
Pavan

Der Material type change associated with the valuatioon class change which is linked with GL a/c
Now just goto MMAM and try to chage...system will give required pre requisit.
From FI angle - valuation of the stock will not get shifted GL a/c to other...hence there should not be nay issue.
Since there was no consumption of gthe material till now in the system, you may hev to fix a consumption account in OBYC for this valuation calss and valuation modifier.
check from MM angle about you may required to maintain some view in material master if required.
Message was edited by:
Rajesha Vittal

How can I remove my traded-in phone from my iCloud account?

I sent my old iPhone back to Verizon as part of a trade-in agreement for a new phone. I followed their instructions for removing "Find my phone" from my old phone before trading it in.
Now, when I log into iCloud I still see my old traded-in phone in addition to my current phone. How can I remove my old phone from my account? Why didn't that happen when I set my old phone to wipe all content before I traded it in?
Thanks,
Will

You would think that erasing the old phone and removing it from your iCloud account would have removed it from your account settings on icloud.com but apparently that's not the case. The only way to have done that would have been to sign out of your iCloud account first, which you obviously can't do at this point.
Although I can't confirm this, one user said that they were told by Apple support that the old phone will automatically be removed when the old phone is signed into another iCloud account. There's nothing else you can do at this point.

Error msg . while creating a GR w.r.t. PO --"ENTER A VALID TRADING PARTNER"

Hi ,
While creating a GR w.r.t. Purchase Order (MB01) getting a following msg:
"ENTER A VALID TRADING PARTNER "
In Vendor Master : Partner function has the vendor details
OA     Ordering Address
VN     Vendor
PI     Invoice presented by
Any thread would be helpful .
regards,
chait

Hi ,
THere is no entry in field :Trading partner LFA1 -
VBUND
ALso the vendor has acccount group : RMIT : Remit to Address
PArtner functions are maintained in vendor master viz. OA ,VN , PI .
regards,
chait

CIN-Pricing Procedure for Trading Goods

Hi Gurus
Need yr expertise... Currently we have trading goods process which do not require any excise duties but VAT or CST is required.. Could you pls advise what will be the best pricing procedure to be used as the proposed pricing procedure by SAP (JFACT or JDEPOT) cannot be used as it will propose excise invoice?
If we do not maintain any excise duties in J1ID, system will not prpose any excise duties if we were to use either of the suggested pricing procedure but we will hit a warning message that excise duties are missing in J1ID..
How can we avoid this and what will be the best pricing procedure which do not require excise duties but sales tax is required?
Rgds..Vinz

Hi Vinz,
you can make your won pricing proced.
e.g. ZMKTPRICE
here you can use your regular condition type what you have defined.
e.g PR00-Sale Price
K007-Discount
MWST= 4% or 12.5 (PR00-K007).
I think this will help you.
Best Regards
Sainath

Trading Partner for open item document prior to BCS implementation

Dear Experts,
We have just introduced BCS in our company currently. One of the difficulties the user are facing is that the open item (many of them - thousand open item with different currencies and exhange rate) prior to the introduction of BCS does not contain Trading Partner. This ended up that the adjustment on the Trading Partner has to be done in BCS regularly. The amount in value of adjustment is not fixed - since there could be subsequent payment that will clear the open item.
I understand that TP cannot be changed once posted. Have read a lot in the SAP portal and forum.
Question: Based on your experience, it there a way that I can overcome this problem? Could SAP somehow allow TP to be assigned to open item document prior to implementation of BCS?
I hope I can get some answer, otherwise, our user has to diligently continue to put the adjustment until all the open items are cleared.
Thank you.
Regards
Fauzi

hi,
Check whether the document type you are using to post is allowed to enter the trading partner.
To check use the TCODe OBA7 and select the relevent document type. then select the check box enter trading partner under control data.
and also check the customer you assigned for that posting key 01 is got assigned trading partner in the master record or not(TCOD XD02/XD03).
thanks.

Copy Trading Partner to Asset line items from Vendor line items in F-90

Dear Friends,
I want to copy trading partner field from Vendor line item to other line items like Asset and Tax in T.code - F-90
Client want to use Transaction type - 100
Is it feasible?
Thanks in advance

try:
1) substitution - tcode OBBH
or
2) open FI - menu FIBF tcode BF44
- event 1120 or 1130
A.

Trading parner chage

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for