Trans duration not consider during Preq forward scheduling

Sales order is created with Make-to-order configurable material
Variant. During the planning process, the raw material is issued from
one facility to the facility specified on the sales order using STO
process.
During CTP process (backward & reverse strategy setting,), while doing
the backward scheduling, system considers the transport duration from
the transportation lane and calculates the correct requested date for
the raw material.
If there is no capacity available to make the raw material on the
requested date system is expected to carry out forward scheduling. The
system then updates the planned order that consumes raw material correctly.
While updating the Preq the system does not consider the transport
duration from the transportation lane. The availability date on PurRqs
and the requested date on the PReqRel is same.
Has anybody seen this issue?
Kedar

Guys,
We found that the transportation time is considered in forward scheduling of a PReq when we have a transportation resource. But it is not considered when we have GR/GI time in product master or in Tlane(only the GR).
Has anybody gone through this issue?
Kedar

Similar Messages

Service areas not considered during autom. item scheduling

Hello,
we've currently trying to activate the automatic scheduling of service orders in our CRM 5.0 SP4 system. The demands (service order items) should be assigned to resources according the ZIP code of the service recipient.
I made the settings for building up service areas mentioned on help.sap.com
(http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm50/helpdata/en/e6/0f2288993743198bf26a2191635525/frameset.htm AND
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm50/helpdata/en/da/7d808043d244cf806dcf0d6e69381e/frameset.htm), however, it doesn't work yet.
In fact I don't understand yet how the resources are assigned to specific service areas. This is mentioned on the help pages, however, not described how it actually works.
Is this the only "missing link" - kindly tell me how to do this - or do I need to perform additional settings? The assignment itself works right now, however, not yet considering service areas.
I made a where-used analysis of the table where the service areas are maintained in, however, no hits.
Thanks & regards
Wolfgang

Hi Aziz,
I agreed with Mr.Ajay M reply ...add on to this "however i also faced this issue i.e.
"No planning Values but there are Actual Values - We can correct this issue by planning in KP06"
We faced the above issue- (we have added the new cost center in between & not planned in KP06- so while running KSS2 the same it has occured- so we have planned in KP06 & ran it done successfully...
As suggested by Mr. Ajay M considering of Fixed & var cost- in ML functionality will flow as system process.
Could you please try to maintain planning & run sure it will help as we also done the same.
Regd,
Khan.

Tax not considered during Quotation Comparison

Dear Buddies,
I have created an RFQ and maintained different condition types (e.g. disc.,frieght,packaging etc.) and also entered tax code.
However, during Quotation comparison ME49 the system did not consider the tax rates.Is this the standard system behavior that during quotation comparison tax code is ignored for calculation and if this holds true why is the tax code option given in quotation ?
My client needs taxes also to be included during quotation comparison.
Awaiting reply,
Cheers !
Sachin Narvekar

Hi,
IMG > Materials management > Purchasing > RFQ/Quotation > Define Screen Lay-out at Document Level
Once you click the last path, look for T. code ME47 and highlight it.
Then click for the Details button.
Once clicking the Details button, look for the field selection GR/IR Control then double click it.
There is a Tax Code field in there.
You can either select (tick the check box) it as required or optional.
Then if you go back to ME47 and click the Item Details button in the application tool bar, the Tax Code will automatically appear.

Quantity related Scale pricing not considered during Goods receipt

Hello Group,
First thanks for looking into my issue. I tried to follow the solution in SAP Note 401941 on assessing the right unit price as it relates to the quantity received during Goods receipt, but my ABAP developers are very green at this time and they cannot figure out where to place this code fix and how it would work.
Background on issue.
From quantity of 1 to 99, I want the price to be 4.00 each
From quantity of 100 and above, I want the price to be 3.00 each.
When doing goods receipts for quantities that have not reached 100 yet, it is still assessing 3.00 each. I found the OSS note above that is really not helpful and was wondering if anyone else is using scale pricing and how their GRs are calculated for correct unit price.
Thanks all for your assistance.
Samantha

The scale pricing cannot be used to influence price during goods receipt. Goods Receipt will pick up the price from the purchasing document.
Suppose you want to have that the price be determined based on the quantity received over a period of time, you need to use rebate agreement.
The OSS note mentioned in your question says that you can determine the price based on the schedule line quantity during GR (not quantity at the time of GR). It will not solve your requirement.
Lakshman

Condition Type not considered during Tax calculation in PO

Dear Experts ,
I made a new condition type called Freight before CST , as this was a requirement for one of my PO.
This new condition is such that its to be considered before calculation of CST , but added after excise duty calculation .
CST =%{(net price + excise duty) + Freight }
I added this condition type in my calculation schema , the issue is when I make a PO , the rates & calculation are done correctly in the condition Tab in Item Detail, & also in the Header , but in Tax/Invoice tab ,the CST is not calculated correctly.
Kindly let me know where I need to do corrections.
Regards,
Divakar

Hi Indranil,
In m/06 , I have maintained Condition class A & Condition category as B for that condition type
Also can you also explain what you meant by "As far my knowledge goes either you maintain it in your tax procedure or in your pricing procedure".
Regards,
DGN

Schduling agreement not considering during MRP

Hi
In source list I have given schduling agreement no and selected 2 in MRP Column.
Now I have run MRP it is creating Planned order, then I converted to PR and going to PO, it is not schduling agreement. Pls help
Let me tell my Scenario briefly.
If stocks falls below reorder point value then, it should create schduling line when I run MRP.
How to do this Explain pls.
Rgds
Srini

Hi,
First you need to maintaint the Proper MRP views for the materials
Create the Scheduling agreement where you maintain the delivery schedules for the materials & Maintain the Source list with inputing Scheduling agreement & MRP column as '2'
Then automatically system will create the schedule lines for that material.
You can check in MD04 without running the MRP for that materials.
The planned order may be created for other requirement not for this scheduling agreement. The system will create the Schedule lines for that material not Planned order. Check in MD04
rgds
Chidanand

Production orders not to be considered during MRP run

Dear SAPeers,
i want to know how to ensure that open production orders are not considered during the MRP run.
the following is the scenario.
PIR for march after MRP run creates a planned order. this planned order is converted to production order. now this production order is processed but not completely confirmed and TECOed after a certain quantity has been produced.
now we delete the old PIR and create a new PIR in the next month. now we revoke the TECO status of the production order and run MRP. I want to know how to avoid MRP from considering the open production order and create planned order for the complete PIR quantity.
Thanks and Regards
Srinivasan

Srini,
what i am worried is shortfall of raw materials in case they were to open the production order in the current month after the planning has been done. how do we allocate raw materials for both the plan as well as the open production order?
Okay, you presumably had RM available for all of your production orders (and those RM were balanced by the reservations from the production orders). Now, you TECO the production order. In effect, any un-issued RM are now released and freely available for other orders/planned orders. Now you plan the following month. Those RM that were freed can and will be used for the new plan. Odd business process, but OK. Now, you re-open the production orders, and, yes, you will have a shortage unless you run RM MRP again. This is, ah, inconsistent with any business process I have ever seen.
The question that jumps to mind is, "Why re-open the old production orders at all? Alternatively, why were they TECOd in the first place?" If one knows that he intends to complete an order in production, one does not normally TECO the order, and then later reverse the TECO.
With respect to my name, I must unfortunately keep a low profile. Ever since I escaped from the mental institution, the thought-police have been hunting for me. I do not wish to be the recipient of any further electroshock 'treatments'.
Rgds,
DB49

In-house production time not considered in scheduling

i have a material, with an in-house production time of 7. requirements date is today, May 23. as a sap standard, using backward scheduling, it shall see that the start day lies in the past, and should switch to forward scheduling, with May 23 as the start date, and may 30 as the finish date. however, the system only proposes a finish date of may 27. why is the system behaving this way?

Hi,
Please let us explain, where u have carried out scheduling ie during the MRP or in Production order.
I hope ur asking about Production order scheduling , inthat case system will not consider the Inhouse production time. Because lead time scheduling is carried in production order.
Scheduling will be done for routing times not for In-house production time.
Pradeep

Rounding quantity field in scheduling agreement not considered in JITK

Hello ALL,
I would like to consult to you a scenario I am facing when it comes to creating a scheduling agreement (VA31) and maintaining a Rounding Quantity (field ABLFZ) in it.
When using the standard LZ type scheduling agremeent, the Rounding quantity is considered when creating a delivery in VL10.
However, when using the LZJ type of scheduling agreement, the Rounding quantity is NOT considered when creating a delivery in JITK.
Can you please tell me what causes the case in LZJ scheduling agreement?
Thank you all in advance.

Hi,
This field is not available for Scheduling Agreement. It is only available for Purchase Order.
Even you will not get this in Field selection also.

Scheduling agreement qty requirement is not considered in V_V2

Hi Friends,
We are facing a problem in rescheduling transaction V_V2. System is not considering the requirement of the confirmed schedule lines of the scheduling agreement while carrying out the ATP in V_V2 and the available qty is allocated to the sales orders.
Ex: Available Stock : 1000 EA
1. SA confirmed Qty: 1000
2. Sales order created for the qty of 1000, system is considering the SA requirement and confirming the SO based on RLT.
3. When we run ATP in sales order change, system is still considering the SA requirement and not changing the confirmed date.
4. But when we run the V_V2, system is ignoring the SA and confirming the SO line item with PULL-IN.
Because of this SO is stealing the stock reserved for the SA. Is there a way to change the behavior of V_V2 similar to VA02, which considers the SA requirement / confirmed qty while rescheduling.
Thanks,
Ram

Hi Ram,
Rescheduling of sales documents is item specific. It is not possible to reschedule individual schedule lines of scheduling
agreements. Each schedule line is displayed but only the open quantity can be rescheduled.
You can find further information in SDV03V02 documentation.
The open qty on item level will be checked becasue rescheduling of sales documents (scheduling agreements) is item specific.
Availability Check in Rescheduling is always on item-level.
Thanks and best regards,
Smile

Route is not considering in delivery scheduling for Third party order proce

Hi All
Advance thanks for your inputs
We need to consider the route in the delivery scheduling for third party order processing..
Example
i have standard order (document type OR) when i have item cat TAN its considering the route for ariving the material availability date, if it has TAS(third party) then its not considering the route......
But we want to consider the route in deliver scheduling in case of third party order...
kindlly pls advice..
regards
raja

Hi Viven.,
Routes they come under normal order as we deliver the goods,but here in TAS,third party sale we are not delivering the goods,Just there is logical moment i.e MIGO,So i dont think we do routes for TAS
Thanks & Regards
Narayana

Do not consider the stock onhand during SNP.

Hi APO specialists.
I'd like to run SNP plan that do not consider the stock onhand.
Material A is purchase item. and the forecast of material A has 400 qty.
and stock onhand is 200 qty.
But I want to make the purchase request as 400 qty.
How to ?
Anyone who has the solution can reply this question.
Thank you all.

Hi,
Try following in separate planning book by copying standard planning book.
In a macro for stock balance change the step for calculation of stock on hand projected. In this step remove the function of INITIAL_STOCK.
Regards,
Vaibhav
Edited by: Vaibhav Birwadkar on May 26, 2008 7:20 AM

MRP- Forward Scheduling

Hi Team,
I have requirement that during MRP run (MD02), planned order to be created for my FERT item with "Forward schedjuling". I understand that MRP always performed with "Backward Scheduling" by default. But i have below clarifications.
Q1: If i set the scheduling type as 'Forward Scheduling" in OPU5 for my plant & order type (LA), still MRP run in MD02 performs "Backward scheduling"?
Q2: How the basic start date & basic end date for my planned orders are calculated during MRP using "Forward Scheduling" with the below assumptions.
Assumptions:
1. In OPU5, for my plant & order type "LA" "Forwad scheduling" is set
2. I do not have routing for my FERT item & i have default operation set in OPJG for my order type & plant
3. In house production time is maintained as 2 days in my FERT material master
4. I have BOM for my FERT item which has only one ROH item.
5. For the ROH item, in my material master, i have set the planned delivery time as 3 days.
6. For the ROH item, the current stock in the plant is ZERO.
7. GR Processing time for both the FERT & ROH item is ZERO.
8. All the days are working day in my plant except saturday & Sunday
9. In MD04, i do not have any entries for my FERT item except the below PIR quantity of 5
10. In MD04, i do not have any entries for my ROH item
11. I did not maintain any schedule margin key for my FERT & ROH item in my material master.
With the above assumptions, i have created the PIR for my FERT item on 01.08.2014 for the quantity 5.
Q3: With this condition, if run MRP for my FERT item, what will be the "basic start date" & "basic end date" for my FERT planned order & what will be the "basic start date" & "basic end date" for my ROH planned order?
Your valuable guidance will be very much needed. Currently i do not have test system to test this case. hence need your valuable comments
Thanks

Hi Caetano,
I have read the document provided by you. Still i can not clear on some points.
The document says that:
For a planned order created by MRP, you observe the following symptoms:
MRP considers the requirement date as basic finish date and calculates the basis start date using backward scheduling
The planned order basic finish date is equal to the requirement date and it is not adjusted according to the production finish date.
As per the above statement after running MRP in MD02 with "Scheduling" type as "Lead Time Scheduling & Capacity Planning", the basic dates are determined with "BACKWARD SCHEDULING" (even though in OPU5 i have mentioned the scheduling type as "FORWARD") as below screen shot & also the "Basic dates" are NOT adjusted even though in OPU5, i have mentioned as "Adjust basic dates & adjust dep.req date to operation date" which is right as per the system design which can not be changed.
Note: I have kept the in house production time as 5 days for my FERT item in material master.
My question is "How the Production dates" are derived during MRP run (refer in the above screen shot). In the routing, i have maintained the labour time as "42.5 hours" for 1 base quantity.
Note: I have maintained the in house production time as 5 days in material master & in routing the labour hours as 42.5 hours (equal to 5days considering 8.5 hours as working hours per day). So the data maintained in material master & in routing are synchronized (CA97)
Thanks

Explain How delivery date is calculated using backward and forward schedul

How can anyone please explain how delivery date is calculated using forward and backward scheduling
I want to have it broken down into the following steps
for eg for delivery date calculation following dates are used
Material Availabilty Date
Material Staging Date
Pick/pack time
Transportation PLanning date
Loading date
Goods issue date
Transit Date
Delivery Date
Can some one please give me an example and explain wht these dates are
for eg customer needs delivery date on 11/20/2008
how would the system cacluate whether it can meet the delivery date using backward scheduling
and if it doesnt meet how does the system do the forward scheduling
also i am not clear with the following dates
material avaialibilty date
material staging date
transportation date
can some one please explain me all this in detail
Thanks

Hi,
Basically this is the CRSD(Customer requested ship date logic)logic in which system calculates the ship date depends upon the material availability. If material is available system calculates ship date on the basis of master data maintained in customisation.Master data is maintained in the following link.
If material is not available then system takes into consideration vendor delivery date & then calculate customer ship date.
Please go through the link in SPRO
LE-Shipping -Basic shipping functions-Scheduling -Delivery scheduling & Transportation scheduling-Maintain duration.
In customisation following data is maintained
Material Availabilty Date
Material Staging Date
Pick/pack time
Transportation PLanning date
Loading date
Goods issue date
Transit Date
Delivery Date
Hope you got the idea of CRSD calculation
Regards,
Prashant.

Disable forward scheduling for a specific material

Hi experts.
We have a requirement to disable forward scheduling for a specific material during ATP check in sales order and delivery processing. I played with some configurations in "Basic functions > Availability check and transfer of requirements" and "Basic functions > Delivery scheduling and transportation scheduling", but none could help.
Notice: we use APO.
Example:
Material X - has 108 pieces in stock and a production order of 1000 pieces scheduled on Feb 11.
If I place a sales order of 109 pieces with requested delivery date of Feb 8, I need the system to not confirm this quantity, instead of confirming the quantity on Feb 13, as of standard behavior.
Regards,
Fábio Scaravelli

Unfortunately, I do not know much about APO. However, I had a quick look and saw the the function responsible for scheduling in APO is /SAPAPO/APO_SCHEDULING. Within this FM, there are two user exits called:
EXIT_/SAPAPO/SAPLVCRM_001
EXIT_/SAPAPO/SAPLVCRM_002
I am unsure if these can be utilised to achieve the desired behaviour. However, they may be worth investigating.

Trans duration not consider during Preq forward scheduling

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for