Transaction DeadLock Error

Hi,
I am trying to execute a transaction in WorkBench and it gives me an Error
"com.sap.xmii.illuminator.logging.LHException:com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerException:Transaction (Process ID 62) was deadlocked on lock resources with another process and has been choosen as the deadlock victim. Rerun the transaction"
This error is coming while executing a SQL action inside the transaction. This Sql action will call a stored procedure on External System to write some data.
These are the server Parameter of this data server.
PoolMax: 100
PollSize: 1
There are already 2 open connections to the same database which are also writing some data using the same Stored Procedure.
Thanks,
Gowtham K.

That error is from your database. There may be ways to mitigate this, just search for the error on google. If using mssql check
[http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/sqlintegrationservices/thread/194f18b0-03b2-4e8f-8c67-5c92373c3efd]
Regards,
Jamie

Similar Messages

Could we get a deadlock error on COMMIT (END TRANSACTION) in BDB-SQL

According to the DB_TXN->commit documentation at:
http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E17076_02/html/api_reference/C/txncommit.html
"After DB_TXN->commit() has been called, regardless of its return, the DB_TXN handle may not be accessed again.
If DB_TXN->commit() encounters an error, the transaction and all child transactions of the transaction are aborted."
Since BDB-SQL uses the BDB engine, should the code handle such errors in BDB-SQL?
Another point to keep in mind is that, post BDB-SQL version 5.1 upon receiving a potential deadlock error all the previous operations(child transactions) in the same transaction are still valid and can be committed.
It would be great if someone can throw some light on this.
Edited by: user10942853 on Jul 28, 2011 9:31 AM

user10942853 wrote:
LaurenFoutz wrote:
I do not think commit can experience a deadlock error since it does not obtain any new locks, and it could not have been in a blocked state if you are able to call commit. Either way, after calling commit on a transaction in SQL the transaction is done, even if an error is returned. At that point if an error is returned the transaction (and all the work its children have done) is either aborted under the covers, or the database has been corrupted, and all future calls to it will return a corruption error that will require restarting the database to restore it (and the restoration will roll back any work done by the transaction since it did not complete cleanly).
Hope that answers your question.
Lauren FoutzLauren, thanks for the reply. From your reply, though there is little possibility that we can get an error on commit looks like we should be prepared to handle such errors in BDB-SQL. We have had instances where we experienced an error on commit while using native BDB (without SQL API) and wanted to confirm the same.You are correct. Error when committing are rare in both the SQL and native API, but they can happen and you should deal with them when they do.
Lauren Foutz

Deadlock error on logical standby

Hi All,
I am get an issue where every thing is working fine on Db server but when it is getting replicated to Logical standby i am getting a deadlock error. Please find error logs below
Fri May 20 21:00:56 2011
ORA-00060: Deadlock detected. More info in file /u01/logicalstdby_home/product/admin/XXXXX/bdump/xxlog_p004_15175.trc.
Fri May 20 21:00:56 2011
8
Errors in file /u01/logicalstdby_home/product/admin/XXXXX/bdump/xxlog_lsp0_2207.trc:
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P004
ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource
9
ORA-12801: error signaled in parallel query server P004
ORA-00060: deadlock detected while waiting for resource
LOGSTDBY Analyzer process P003 pid=42 OS id=15173 stopped
Please can anyone help in investigation.
Thanks and Regrads,
Amol

Hi ,
I have the logs from deadlock file.
There are two queries in this dump. Does this mean that the two queries in the logs (which are actually same) are runing in parellel. Because this actually ran fine on the primary database.
DEADLOCK DETECTED ( ORA-00060 )
[Transaction Deadlock]
The following deadlock is not an ORACLE error. It is a
deadlock due to user error in the design of an application
or from issuing incorrect ad-hoc SQL. The following
information may aid in determining the deadlock:
Deadlock graph:
---------Blocker(s)-------- ---------Waiter(s)---------
Resource Name process session holds waits process session holds waits
TX-01350024-00098ad3 44 804 X 46 797 S
TX-012f0006-0008ac28 46 797 X 60 874 S
TX-01340000-000a175c 60 874 X 44 804 S
session 804: DID 0001-002C-0003E40C     session 797: DID 0001-002E-00002364
session 797: DID 0001-002E-00002364     session 874: DID 0001-003C-0000019C
session 874: DID 0001-003C-0000019C     session 804: DID 0001-002C-0003E40C
Rows waited on:
Session 797: obj - rowid = 00000000 - D/////AAaAAHqeAAAA
(dictionary objn - 0, file - 26, block - 2008960, slot - 0)
Session 874: obj - rowid = 00089976 - AAC5PjAAFAAAmj+AAA
(dictionary objn - 563574, file - 5, block - 157950, slot - 0)
Session 804: obj - rowid = 00089976 - AAC5PjAAFAAAmi3AAA
(dictionary objn - 563574, file - 5, block - 157879, slot - 0)
Information on the OTHER waiting sessions:
Session 797:
pid=46 serial=418 audsid=0 user: 0/SYS
O/S info: user: oracle, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 15180, machine: db5p
program: oracle@db5p (P006)
Current SQL Statement:
update /*+ streams restrict_all_ref_cons */ "BEBSS"."SUBSCRIBER_POLICY_BROKER_EVENT" p set "ACTIVITY_TYPE"=decode(:1,'N',"ACTIVITY_TYPE",:2), "ATTRIBUTE_SET"=decode(:3,'N',"ATTRIBUTE_SET",:4), "CREATED_DATE"=decode(:5,'N',"CREATED_DATE",:6), "CUSTOMER_ID"=decode(:7,'N',"CUSTOMER_ID",:8), "FILE_NAME"=decode(:9,'N',"FILE_NAME",:10), "ID"=decode(:11,'N',"ID",:12), "LAST_MODIFIED_DATE"=decode(:13,'N',"LAST_MODIFIED_DATE",:14), "PORT_NUMBER"=decode(:15,'N',"PORT_NUMBER",:16), "PROCESSED_DATE"=decode(:17,'N',"PROCESSED_DATE",:18), "SERVICE_PACKAGE_ID"=decode(:19,'N',"SERVICE_PACKAGE_ID",:20), "STATUS"=decode(:21,'N',"STATUS",:22), "TRANSACTION_TYPE"=decode(:23,'N',"TRANSACTION_TYPE",:24) where (:25='N' or(decode(:26,'N','Y',decode(:27,"ACTIVITY_TYPE",'Y'))='Y' and decode(:28,'N','Y',decode(:29,"ATTRIBUTE_SET",'Y'))='Y' and decode(:30,'N','Y',decode(:31,"CREATED_DATE",'Y'))='Y' and decode(:32,'N','Y',decode(:33,"CUSTOMER_ID",'Y'))='Y' and decode(:34,'N','Y',decode(:35,"FILE_NAME",'Y'))='Y' and 1=1 and decode(:36,'N','Y',decode(:37,"LAST_MODIFIED_DATE",'Y'))='Y' and decode(:38,'N','Y',decode(:39,"PORT_NUMBER",'Y'))='Y' and decode(:40,'N','Y',decode(:41,"PROCESSED_DATE",'Y'))='Y' and decode(:42,'N','Y',decode(:43,"SERVICE_PACKAGE_ID",'Y'))='Y' and decode(:44,'N','Y',decode(:45,"STATUS",'Y'))='Y' and decode(:46,'N','Y',decode(:47,"TRANSACTION_TYPE",'Y'))='Y')) and(:48="ID")
Session 874:
pid=60 serial=20958 audsid=0 user: 0/SYS
O/S info: user: oracle, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 15182, machine: db5p
program: oracle@db5p (P007)
Current SQL Statement:
update /*+ streams restrict_all_ref_cons */ "BEBSS"."SUBSCRIBER_POLICY_BROKER_EVENT" p set "ACTIVITY_TYPE"=decode(:1,'N',"ACTIVITY_TYPE",:2), "ATTRIBUTE_SET"=decode(:3,'N',"ATTRIBUTE_SET",:4), "CREATED_DATE"=decode(:5,'N',"CREATED_DATE",:6), "CUSTOMER_ID"=decode(:7,'N',"CUSTOMER_ID",:8), "FILE_NAME"=decode(:9,'N',"FILE_NAME",:10), "ID"=decode(:11,'N',"ID",:12), "LAST_MODIFIED_DATE"=decode(:13,'N',"LAST_MODIFIED_DATE",:14), "PORT_NUMBER"=decode(:15,'N',"PORT_NUMBER",:16), "PROCESSED_DATE"=decode(:17,'N',"PROCESSED_DATE",:18), "SERVICE_PACKAGE_ID"=decode(:19,'N',"SERVICE_PACKAGE_ID",:20), "STATUS"=decode(:21,'N',"STATUS",:22), "TRANSACTION_TYPE"=decode(:23,'N',"TRANSACTION_TYPE",:24) where (:25='N' or(decode(:26,'N','Y',decode(:27,"ACTIVITY_TYPE",'Y'))='Y' and decode(:28,'N','Y',decode(:29,"ATTRIBUTE_SET",'Y'))='Y' and decode(:30,'N','Y',decode(:31,"CREATED_DATE",'Y'))='Y' and decode(:32,'N','Y',decode(:33,"CUSTOMER_ID",'Y'))='Y' and decode(:34,'N','Y',decode(:35,"FILE_NAME",'Y'))='Y' and 1=1 and decode(:36,'N','Y',decode(:37,"LAST_MODIFIED_DATE",'Y'))='Y' and decode(:38,'N','Y',decode(:39,"PORT_NUMBER",'Y'))='Y' and decode(:40,'N','Y',decode(:41,"PROCESSED_DATE",'Y'))='Y' and decode(:42,'N','Y',decode(:43,"SERVICE_PACKAGE_ID",'Y'))='Y' and decode(:44,'N','Y',decode(:45,"STATUS",'Y'))='Y' and decode(:46,'N','Y',decode(:47,"TRANSACTION_TYPE",'Y'))='Y')) and(:48="ID")
End of information on OTHER waiting sessions.
Current SQL statement for this session:
update /*+ streams restrict_all_ref_cons */ "BEBSS"."SUBSCRIBER_POLICY_BROKER_EVENT" p set "ACTIVITY_TYPE"=decode(:1,'N',"ACTIVITY_TYPE",:2), "ATTRIBUTE_SET"=decode(:3,'N',"ATTRIBUTE_SET",:4), "CREATED_DATE"=decode(:5,'N',"CREATED_DATE",:6), "CUSTOMER_ID"=decode(:7,'N',"CUSTOMER_ID",:8), "FILE_NAME"=decode(:9,'N',"FILE_NAME",:10), "ID"=decode(:11,'N',"ID",:12), "LAST_MODIFIED_DATE"=decode(:13,'N',"LAST_MODIFIED_DATE",:14), "PORT_NUMBER"=decode(:15,'N',"PORT_NUMBER",:16), "PROCESSED_DATE"=decode(:17,'N',"PROCESSED_DATE",:18), "SERVICE_PACKAGE_ID"=decode(:19,'N',"SERVICE_PACKAGE_ID",:20), "STATUS"=decode(:21,'N',"STATUS",:22), "TRANSACTION_TYPE"=decode(:23,'N',"TRANSACTION_TYPE",:24) where (:25='N' or(decode(:26,'N','Y',decode(:27,"ACTIVITY_TYPE",'Y'))='Y' and decode(:28,'N','Y',decode(:29,"ATTRIBUTE_SET",'Y'))='Y' and decode(:30,'N','Y',decode(:31,"CREATED_DATE",'Y'))='Y' and decode(:32,'N','Y',decode(:33,"CUSTOMER_ID",'Y'))='Y' and decode(:34,'N','Y',decode(:35,"FILE_NAME",'Y'))='Y' and 1=1 and decode(:36,'N','Y',decode(:37,"LAST_MODIFIED_DATE",'Y'))='Y' and decode(:38,'N','Y',decode(:39,"PORT_NUMBER",'Y'))='Y' and decode(:40,'N','Y',decode(:41,"PROCESSED_DATE",'Y'))='Y' and decode(:42,'N','Y',decode(:43,"SERVICE_PACKAGE_ID",'Y'))='Y' and decode(:44,'N','Y',decode(:45,"STATUS",'Y'))='Y' and decode(:46,'N','Y',decode(:47,"TRANSACTION_TYPE",'Y'))='Y')) and(:48="ID")
===================================================
PROCESS STATE
Process global information:
process: 0x29c53bcc8, call: 0x29567f358, xact: 0x299db2d90, curses: 0x29c811dd8, usrses: 0x29c811dd8
SO: 0x29c53bcc8, type: 2, owner: (nil), flag: INIT/-/-/0x00
(process) Oracle pid=44, calls cur/top: 0x29567f358/0x29567eb18, flag: (0) -
int error: 0, call error: 0, sess error: 0, txn error 0
(post info) last post received: 0 0 117
last post received-location: kcbzww
last process to post me: 29c53fc08 42 0
last post sent: 0 0 117
last post sent-location: kcbzww
last process posted by me: 29c53c4b0 188 0
(latch info) wait_event=0 bits=0
Process Group: DEFAULT, pseudo proc: 0x29f601e88
O/S info: user: oracle, term: UNKNOWN, ospid: 15175
OSD pid info: Unix process pid: 15175, image: oracle@db5p (P004)
Dump of memory from 0x000000029C500F08 to 0x000000029C501110
29C500F00 00000002 00000000 [........]
29C500F10 9C811DD8 00000002 00000004 0003129B [................]
29C500F20 8F34B7A0 00000002 0000001E 0003115B [..4.........[...]
29C500F30 9CA03A98 00000002 0000000B 000313A7 [.:..............]
29C500F40 9EBD0510 00000002 0000003D 0003115B [........=...[...]
29C500F50 9C803260 00000002 00000004 0003129B [`2..............]
29C500F60 75E66848 00000001 0000001E 0003115B [Hh.u........[...]
29C500F70 99507DB0 00000002 00000007 000313A7 [.}P.............]
29C500F80 99507F70 00000002 00000007 000313A7 [p.P.............]
29C500F90 995083D0 00000002 00000007 000313A7 [..P.............]
29C500FA0 99508CA8 00000002 00000007 000313A7 [..P.............]
29C500FB0 995093C0 00000002 00000007 000313A7 [..P.............]
29C500FC0 99509AC0 00000002 00000007 000313A7 [..P.............]
29C500FD0 9950AC58 00000002 00000007 000313A7 [X.P.............]
29C500FE0 9950B290 00000002 00000007 000313A7 [..P.............]
29C500FF0 9950D6A0 00000002 00000007 000313A7 [..P.............]
29C501000 994FDAB0 00000002 00000007 000313A7 [..O.............]
29C501010 99510640 00000002 00000007 000313A7 [@.Q.............]
29C501020 99510B80 00000002 00000007 000313A7 [..Q.............]
29C501030 99510FE0 00000002 00000007 000313A7 [..Q.............]
29C501040 99511298 00000002 00000007 000313A7 [..Q.............]
29C501050 99511998 00000002 00000007 000313A7 [..Q.............]
29C501060 99511A78 00000002 00000007 000313A7 [x.Q.............]
29C501070 99511B58 00000002 00000007 000313A7 [X.Q.............]
29C501080 99512350 00000002 00000007 000313A7 [P#Q.............]
29C501090 99513248 00000002 00000007 000313A7 [H2Q.............]
29C5010A0 99513408 00000002 00000007 000313A7 [.4Q.............]
29C5010B0 99513788 00000002 00000007 000313A7 [.7Q.............]
29C5010C0 9CA04DE8 00000002 0000000B 000313A7 [.M..............]
29C5010D0 995144C0 00000002 00000007 000313A7 [.DQ.............]
29C5010E0 99515038 00000002 00000007 000313A7 [8PQ.............]
29C5010F0 995152D8 00000002 00000007 000313A7 [.RQ.............]
29C501100 995159F0 00000002 00000007 000313A7 [.YQ.............]
Thanks,
Amol

Deadlock error

Hi , iam geeting a dead log error from an autonomous trigger.
But in log file it show the same session nos'
DEADLOCK DETECTED ( ORA-00060 )
[Transaction Deadlock]
The following deadlock is not an ORACLE error. It is a
deadlock due to user error in the design of an application
or from issuing incorrect ad-hoc SQL. The following
information may aid in determining the deadlock:
Deadlock graph:
                       ---------Blocker(s)-------- ---------Waiter(s)---------
Resource Name          process session holds waits process session holds waits
TX-00010003-00000459        16     188     X             16     188           X
session 188: DID 0001-0010-000021B4     session 188: DID 0001-0010-000021B4
Rows waited on:
Session 188: obj - rowid = 00002F8A - AAAC+KAAEAAACzcAAA
(dictionary objn - 12170, file - 4, block - 11484, slot - 0)
Information on the OTHER waiting sessions:
End of information on OTHER waiting sessions.
Current SQL statement for this session:
UPDATE SUMMARY SET NAME = :B1 WHERE Mint_NAME = TO_CHAR(:B2 )
----- PL/SQL Call Stack -----
object      line object
handle    number name
1B5C1E9C       109 BF_AU_IP_TEST
1F957020      8352 package body MINT
1B719024        19 package body ALOADER
1B7615E0         1 anonymous block
===================================================THIS IS MY AUTONOMOUS TRIGGER -BF_AU_IP_TEST
this trigger has the following update staetment
UPDATE SUMMARY SET NAME = :B1 WHERE Mint_NAME = TO_CHAR(:B2 )
Edited by: user8792751 on Aug 19, 2010 2:59 AM

Deadlock graph:
                       ---------Blocker(s)-------- ---------Waiter(s)---------
Resource Name          process session holds waits process session holds waits
TX-00010003-00000459        16     188     X             16     188           Xyou have a TX (transaction) enqueue with exclusive mode (X) being held and exclusive mode(X) being waited on
Which means that two sessions are doing concurrent DML on the same target.
you have the sql statement involved in the deadlock and you have the row waited on
Rows waited on:
Session 188: obj - rowid = 00002F8A - AAAC+KAAEAAACzcAAAremember that an autonomous transaction when called represents a new session and then don't be surprised to observe deadlock in this situation.
But, please, let me know why you are
(a) using an autonomous transaction
(b) and using an autonomous transaction in trigger
I may help you to find another way to do your requirement
Regards
Mohamed Houri

Why when Oracle gives me a 00060 Deadlock error do my trace logs no graphs?

Normally everything you read online shows you that Oracle's trace files will contain a deadlock graph.
At work we have trace files being generated and when we look at the trace file reference by the alert file
there is no deadlock graph for any deadlock 00060 detected error.
We have an Oracle 11gR1 RAC cluster
Any idea why we wouldn't see deadlock graphs with all the useful information necessary to hunt down these deadlocks?

Hi,
Actually word "Graph" was misleading, if you expect the graph you mention through tat link, then you are right, you should see that "graph. See the trace file name in the alert log file and then open that file and you should see this graph in the start of this trace file.
I created a deadlock scenario and following is what i find in my trace file which tells me session, object id and row ids involved in the dead lock.
{code}
DEADLOCK DETECTED
[Transaction Deadlock]
Current SQL statement for this session:
delete from test where ename='MILLER'
The following deadlock is not an ORACLE error. It is a
deadlock due to user error in the design of an application
or from issuing incorrect ad-hoc SQL. The following
information may aid in determining the deadlock:
Deadlock graph:
---------Blocker(s)-------- ---------Waiter(s)---------
Resource Name process session holds waits process session holds waits
TX-00030013-00006a5a 16 120 X 20 131 X
TX-0006000d-00006aff 20 131 X 16 120 X
session 120: DID 0001-0010-000001F5 session 131: DID 0001-0014-000000E2
session 131: DID 0001-0014-000000E2 session 120: DID 0001-0010-000001F5
Rows waited on:
Session 131: obj - rowid = 0001727B - AAAXJ7AAEAAAB8EAAH
(dictionary objn - 94843, file - 4, block - 7940, slot - 7)
Session 120: obj - rowid = 0001727B - AAAXJ7AAEAAAB8EAAN
(dictionary objn - 94843, file - 4, block - 7940, slot - 13)
Information on the OTHER waiting sessions:
Session 131:
pid=20 serial=594 audsid=189998 user: 54/SCOTT
O/S info: user: Salman, term: SALMAN, ospid: 6504:8036, machine: UTAC\SALMAN
program: sqlplus.exe
application name: SQL*Plus, hash value=3669949024
Current SQL Statement:
delete from test where ename='SCOTT'
End of information on OTHER waiting sessions.
{code}
*Note:* Please always write your code/output enclosed in {code} tag and see "Preview" before posting your reply
Thanks
Salman

Error-Code: ora-4020 Deadlock error, while updating a record

Hello!
Is it possible to get a deadlock error when two or more users try to update the same record simultaneously? And what would be the best solution to circumvent this?
Thanks
Your help is appreciated.

<BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by ( vidya):
Hello Vidhya,
Issue either Commit or Rollback without much delay once the statement(s) is/are executed.
vmkrish
[email protected]
Is it possible to get a deadlock error when two or more users try to update the same record simultaneously? And what would be the best solution to circumvent this?
Thanks
Your help is appreciated.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
null

Balance in transaction currency error for AUC settlement

I was trying to perform AUC settlement and hit Balance in transaction currency error. When i open up the line items I found that there are 2 sets (duplicate) of data posted to the depreciation area. The second set is with value 0 except depreciation area 01 posted as 100000EUR.
so now i have 2 line with 100000EUR for depreciation area 01. I guess this is the main culprit of generating the error Balance in transaction currency.
I'd glad if someone can tell me why they are 2 sets of data generated in line items? I only post the vendor invoice against the AUC once.
Or perhaps am I heading to the right way in identifying the root cause of this issue?
This is part of the AC010 course part of asset accounting that teaching on AUC aasets.
Any positive reply is welcomed!
I attached the line item image. Please note that there are some lines hidden for dep area beyond 03. and all are with amount 0.
[Line Item Image|http://www.bnl.com.my/photos/aucsettle.jpg]
Edited by: Kam Weng Leong on Dec 13, 2009 5:00 AM

I was trying to perform AUC settlement and hit Balance in transaction currency error. When i open up the line items I found that there are 2 sets (duplicate) of data posted to the depreciation area. The second set is with value 0 except depreciation area 01 posted as 100000EUR.
so now i have 2 line with 100000EUR for depreciation area 01. I guess this is the main culprit of generating the error Balance in transaction currency.
I'd glad if someone can tell me why they are 2 sets of data generated in line items? I only post the vendor invoice against the AUC once.
Or perhaps am I heading to the right way in identifying the root cause of this issue?
This is part of the AC010 course part of asset accounting that teaching on AUC aasets.
Any positive reply is welcomed!
I attached the line item image. Please note that there are some lines hidden for dep area beyond 03. and all are with amount 0.
[Line Item Image|http://www.bnl.com.my/photos/aucsettle.jpg]
Edited by: Kam Weng Leong on Dec 13, 2009 5:00 AM

ECC Transaction iView Error on Browser Resize

Hello.
I have created hundreds of SAP ECC Transaction iViews in the portal. After doing some testing, I realized that any time a browser window is modified when an ECC transaction iView is within display, the resize causes the transaction iView to refresh. Upon refreshing, the transaction throws error or works as if the user submitted the transaction on the backend, instead of just remaining in the same state.
For instance, if you have an SAP Transaction iView to an ECC system for tcode QM01 and it is accessible through the Detailed Navigation, this iView can be opened either in its own browser window, or within the desktop inner page. If configured to pop-up in a new browser window and you click or drag to resize the browser window, the transaction refreshes, and throws the error: "Fill in all required entry fields." This is the same error that is thrown in ECC when a user submits the transaction with no data. Similarly, if you have the iView configured to open within the portal framework and you click on the transaction it opens in the desktop inner page. If you maximize/restore down the browser window displaying the portal, the transaction refreshes within the desktop inner page and throws this same error, like it was submitted.
It happens with every ECC transaction iView that I have created, but does not happen with SRM IAC iViews, Web DynPro iViews, or SUS functionality iViews. This leads me to believe it is a problem in ITS. Does anyone know what is going wrong, or how to fix this?
Thanks for any help!
Alexa

Hi,
Super admin has permission for end user for all the iViews. So he will be able to view the iView. As mentioned, please check if the end user permission is given for the end user to access the iView. Also check if the permission is given for that particular system. To check permissions, go to System Administration -> Permissions -> Portal permissions -> Portal Content. Check for iView and system that you have created.
Regards,
Harinin S

Get error from SQL AGENT: The SSIS Runtime has failed to enlist the OLE DB connection in a distributed transaction with error 0x8004D024

I am running SQL Agent that executes an SSIS process from sql server1. The SSIS process executes its SQL/tables/sp’s against another sql server2.
I get an error after adding data flow tasks with transaction supported within a sequence with transaction required. The error, “The SSIS Runtime has failed to enlist the OLE DB connection in a distributed transaction with error 0x8004D024 "The transaction
manager has disabled its support for remote/network transactions"
Prior to adding this sequence everything was working from sql agent, and there were other sequences with oledb destinations.
Everything works when running within SSIS Package.
I see this article on similar issue,
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/sqlserver/en-US/0bfa2569-8849-4884-8f68-8edf98a9b4fe/problem-to-execute-a-package-and-tasks-with-a-certain-transactionoption-property-i-need-help?forum=sqlintegrationservices
“I had similar issue and solved by setting the following on both the machines. Allow Remote Clients, Allow Remote Administration,
Allow Inbound Clients, Allow Outbound Clients, and TIP are enabled in Component Services/My Computer/Properties/MSDTC/Security Configuration.”
I don’t want to remove transaction required for the “Remove Duplicates from Staging” sequence.
Anyone seen this?
Greg Hanson

DTC was running on remote computer. The problem was it was no longer accepting transactions from remote servers. This was in SSIS so I had to turn to "Transaction Supported" for all Data Flow Transactions.
Greg Hanson

Yum install Oracle-Validated Transaction Check Error:

Doing a yum install oracle-validated command with CentOS 5.3 and got these errors:
Running rpm_check_debug
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test
Transaction Check Error:
file /etc/issue from install of enterprise-release-5-0.0.17.x86_64 conflicts with file from package centos-release-5-3.el5.centos.1.x86_64
file /etc/issue.net from install of enterprise-release-5-0.0.17.x86_64 conflicts with file from package centos-release-5-3.el5.centos.1.x86_64
file /etc/redhat-release from install of enterprise-release-5-0.0.17.x86_64 conflicts with file from package centos-release-5-3.el5.centos.1.x86_64
file /usr/share/eula/eula.en_US from install of enterprise-release-5-0.0.17.x86_64 conflicts with file from package centos-release-5-3.el5.centos.1.x86_64
file /usr/share/firstboot/modules/eula.py from install of enterprise-release-5-0.0.17.x86_64 conflicts with file from package centos-release-5-3.el5.centos.1.x86_64
file /usr/share/firstboot/modules/eula.pyc from install of enterprise-release-5-0.0.17.x86_64 conflicts with file from package centos-release-5-3.el5.centos.1.x86_64
file /usr/share/firstboot/modules/eula.pyo from install of enterprise-release-5-0.0.17.x86_64 conflicts with file from package centos-release-5-3.el5.centos.1.x86_64
Error Summary
Did the yum update work? Should I procede with the oracle install?
Thanks in advance

Hi Tom,
Could you please help me as im trying to install ORACLE OID 10.1.4.0.1 on OEL 5 n trying to use yum to load the default RMP
]# yum install oracle-validated
Loaded plugins: security
el5_oracle_addons | 951 B 00:00
primary.xml.gz | 1.6 kB 00:00
el5_oracle_addons 10/10
epel | 2.3 kB 00:00
primary.sqlite.bz2 | 2.0 MB 00:05
el5_ga_base | 1.1 kB 00:00
Setting up Install Process
Parsing package install arguments
No package oracle-validated available.
repo file :
[el5_ga_base]
name=Enterprise Linux $releasever GA - $basearch - base
baseurl=http://public-yum.oracle.com/repo/EnterpriseLinux/EL5/0/base/$basearch/
gpgkey=http://public-yum.oracle.com/RPM-GPG-KEY-oracle-el5
gpgcheck=1
enabled=1
[el5_u1_base]
name=Enterprise Linux $releasever U1 - $basearch - base
baseurl=http://public-yum.oracle.com/repo/EnterpriseLinux/EL5/1/base/$basearch/
gpgkey=http://public-yum.oracle.com/RPM-GPG-KEY-oracle-el5
gpgcheck=1
enabled=0
[el5_u2_base]
name=Enterprise Linux $releasever U2 - $basearch - base
baseurl=http://public-yum.oracle.com/repo/EnterpriseLinux/EL5/2/base/$basearch/
gpgkey=http://public-yum.oracle.com/RPM-GPG-KEY-oracle-el5
gpgcheck=1
enabled=0
[el5_u3_base]
name=Enterprise Linux $releasever U3 - $basearch - base
baseurl=http://public-yum.oracle.com/repo/EnterpriseLinux/EL5/3/base/$basearch/
gpgkey=http://public-yum.oracle.com/RPM-GPG-KEY-oracle-el5
gpgcheck=1
enabled=0
[el5_addons]
name=Enterprise Linux $releasever - $basearch - addons
baseurl=http://public-yum.oracle.com/repo/EnterpriseLinux/EL5/addons/$basearch/
gpgkey=http://public-yum.oracle.com/RPM-GPG-KEY-oracle-el5
gpgcheck=1
enabled=0
[el5_oracle_addons]
name=Enterprise Linux $releasever - $basearch - oracle_addons
baseurl=http://public-yum.oracle.com/repo/EnterpriseLinux/EL5/oracle_addons/$basearch/
gpgkey=http://public-yum.oracle.com/RPM-GPG-KEY-oracle-el5
gpgcheck=1
enabled=1
best regards,

J1IEX: Balance in Transaction Currency ERROR

All SAP Gurus,
While doing J1IEX: Balance in Transaction Currency ERROR occurs.
This happens only when figures are not even in case of capital goods credit.
Which SAP Note to be applied so that, system will accept odd figures too.
Regards,

Hi Rajan, Check the following threads :
Balance in transaction currency
Re: Balance in transaction currency Error

Balance in transaction currency error

Hi Friends,
In order to ressolve "Balance in transaction currency" error during J1IIN, we have applied oss notes 1018071 & 978186. However we are getting same promblem
Please help on this.

Hi shiv,
Kindly refer this threads,
Balance in transaction currency
Error : Balance in Transaction Currency
Error F5702 Balance in transaction currency VF01
Re: Balance in Transaction Currency
error in Balance in transaction currency
Balance in transaction currency
Thanks,
Swamy H P

Transaction Processor Error in View Pending Transactions

Dear All,
I am getting the Error: "Transaction Processor Error" in View Pending Transactions.
How can I identify due to what reason, this error had occured
because of this I am not able to close the inventory period for these transaction months..
and also I am having the following Error msg for another item in view Pending Transactions..,
How can I clear this ..?
Please update...
Many Thanks in advance....
Edited by: santark on Nov 10, 2009 6:46 PM

Hi,
This is not really and error. Oracle processes transaction in a batch. If one record will fail because of some error, other records/transaction in the batch fails with this error. For this error you really need to get the ERROR_EXPLANATION to find out the exact message as to why it is possibly failing. These can usually have their three flags reset and re-submitted as this error is usually attached to those records in a group where one of the records has been erred with one of the more severe errors.
I believe you can resubmit the transactions which are failed with the below script
Update mtl_material_transactions_temp
set      process_flag = ‘Y’,
     lock_flag = 'N',
     transaction_mode = 3,
error_code = NULL
Where organization_id = &org_id
Thanks,
Raghav

Deadlock error in forms

Hi,
I have got an assignment to find out reasons for deadlock error in two forms. Client doesnot have any records
like error number,message what soever. Please tell me how to trobleshoot it, what are things which I should check in forms,procedures etc.
Thanks in advance.
Sandy

Can you reproduce the error? If not, it might be complicated.
A deadlock occurs, in general, if two programs access two ressources in different order, and then two users run the two programs with the same database objects. The following is a short overview, leaving out some details.
Lets say, program (or form) A updates table T1 for a specific object O, and then update table T2 for a specific object O.
And program (or form) B first updates table T2 for a specific object O and then update table T1 for a specific object O.
When two users run the two programs for the same object O, the following happens (assuming the appropiate "timing"):
User U1 starts working with program A and updates table T1 for the object O, the appropiate reocrd in T1 now is locked.
User U2 starts working with program B and updates table T2 for the same object O, the appropiate record in T2 now is locked.
Now user U1 continues with program A and tries to update T2. This will not work, for T2 is already locked by user U2, so the session will wait.
Now user U2 continues with program B and tries to update T1. This will not work, for T1 is already locked by user U1, so the session will wait.
Now U1 waits for U2 and U2 waits for U1, this is called a deadlock. The database is able to detect this situation and raises an error.
So, to find that situation:
Look for manual UPDATE's or DELETE's inside the forms
Look for transactiosn where some tables are involved in different order.
Hope this helps.

Transact RFC error

Hi Gurus,
I am getting one issue while loading the data thru infopackage.
While loading the data in 3.5 flow for some souce system it is taking long time
and givig me transact RFC error. I have checked the source system connectivity and it is fine.Although the status is yellow during the load but at the end of the load it turns to red and it gives me below mentioned error:
Missing data packages for No selection information arrived from the source s
Diagnosis
Data packets are missing from No selection information arrived from the source s. BI processing does not return any errors. The data transport from the source system to BI was probably incorrect.
Procedure
Check the tRFC overview in the source system.
You access this log using the wizard or following the menu path "Environment -> Transact. RFC -> Source System".
Error handling:
If the tRFC is incorrect, resolve the errors listed there.
Check that the source system is connected properly to BI. In particular, check the remote user authorizations in BI.
Kindly let me know your suggestion in this issue.
Thanks in advance.
Amit

Hi
This error would normally occur, if at the time of processing, the data packets get stuck
To check for stuck trfc follow the path
Environment -> Transact. RFC -> Source System
there, check if trfc recorded, then it means, it is stuck, slecect that particular record and press F6 to execute the LUW.
If this is not the case, check the job overview in the source system.
IF you find ARFCSTATE = loading/sysfail, it means the trfc is stuck ..
you can check the datapacket number from there, and try mannual update for those partiular data packets.
Or else, sometimes, the packet itself doesnt arrive in BW, because of connection problem during the processing of few packets, ands later when you check, it seems fine.
In such cases simply repeat the load
Hope this helps
Regards
Shilpa

Transaction DeadLock Error

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for