Transaction/Movement type on the vendor line item

When we post to a vendor using F-43 (or FB01) using posting key 31. We want the field Transaction type to be available for input in the vendor line item. But this is not happening. note: In the FSG of vendor recon account and Posting key 31 this field is optional. On the other hand, this field is available in the GL line item. Please also note that I am not talking here the transaction type available for asset posting
Please advice
Thanks
Ranjit
Edited by: Ron on May 14, 2010 2:39 PM

Hi Ranjit,
Perhaps it was hidden. Please check System -> Status. Double click the screen number. You will get to the next screen. Goto -> Layout or click the layout icon. You will see the screen layout that being used in F-43. To modify this, please get the ABAPer to assist.
Regards
Fauzi

Similar Messages

KR doc type posted without vendor line item a mandatory item category

Hello Gurus,
We have SPL document splitter activated in our ECC system. We have the business transaction variant 0300 / Z001 assigned to doc type KR. The vendor line is obligatory in the above business transaction variant (BTV). THe splitting rule is also assigned for this BTV.
THe problem is that despite having the vendor as obligatory for this BTV, we are able to post the doc type KR (vendor invoice) without the vendor line item e.g.. doc with doc type KR and debit and credit to expense a/c.
Please share your experience if anyone has come across this issue,
Prakash

Hi,
To make the vendor line mandatory for KR document type, you can write the validation as below:-
Step 1:-
Create a message ID via transaction code SE91 for message class /EACC/MSG/ACC_COMP as you want to display to user.
Step 2:-
Go to transaction GGB0 and create the validation step at complete document level in Financial Accounting as below:-
Pre Requisits:-
BKPF-BLART = 'KR'.
Check:-
Create a exit code using user exit and check that line items have at least one vendor line item.
For this take the help of ABAPer and create a copy of the program RGGBR000 and code your check here and assign to the application area GBLR in view V_T80D via transaction code SM30.
Message:-
Message created in step 1 as error message.
Step 3:-
Please also check that this validation has active status (Status=1) at line complete document level (level 3) for your company code in transaction OB28.
Regards,
Gaurav

We cannot see the segment in the vendor line item

Hi,
We have updated the Segment field as Optional in OB41 transaction for posting key equal to 21 and the same for the corresponding GL account. When we create a document in FB01 transaction with SA type for example, we can't see the segment field in the vendor line item.
Could you tell me if we need to do something more to see the segment?
Thanks in advance,
SAP user

Hi,
whe we are entering the vendor line item we can enter the Fund and fund Center, our segment will be derived from the fund ( we have done it in a substitution, if the segment is empty we derive it from the fund) and in BSEG table we can see that the segment is filled correctly. But we cannot change it because this fields segment don't appear in the screen. We have reviewed the SAPMF05A 0332 Screen (screen that we can see when we are entering the vendor line item and we push in "More data" button) but the segment field don't appear.
Thanks in advance,
Sap Userr

Iterating through bseg line items and picking the vendor line item

Hello,
I am creating a report in which i want to show the list of vendors (with their WHT's). The output will be based on selection of a certain period(range). I guess i have to first iterate through BKPF and get those documents that lie in the given range, then i 'll have to iterate through the selected documents in BSEG and pick out the vendor line items (KOART = 'S'). Will i be using GET for this..
Is this the right way? secondly, if yes, can sumone show me how to iterate through BKPF and BSEG and get vendor details.?
Thanks..
SHehryar

Hey,
Instead of selecting data from BKPF-BSEG you could use BKPF-BSIK-BSAK.
BSIK and BSAK have the same details as BSEG and are use by SAP for reporting purposes.
Similarly for customer the table are BSID, BSAD and for GL the tables are BSIS and BSAS.
BSIK will have the open items and BSAK will have the cleared items.
-Kiran

PERNR - Personnel Number on vendor line item of the FI document Posting

After posting a time sheet (PR05, PRFI, PRRW), the FI document created (display via FB03) has the personnel number on each of the GL line items, but the field is blank on the vendor line item. Does anyone know how to get this to be populated with the same data as being populated on the GL line items (it's the same field BSEG-PERNR)? I've made the field optional on the vendor reconciliation account as well as on the posting key, but no success yet. thanks.

Thanks all for responding.
The vendor master was populated. The strange thing is that the GL line item gets populated but not the vendor line item in BKPF/BSEG. We talked to SAP and to get the vendor line item to populate we would have to do an SAP coding change.
I created a quickview (SQVI) between the appropriate tables to get the report out that we needed (a bit easier than an ABAP) - but nontheless it worked.
thanks again.

IDOC INVOIC/FI, why is vendor line item always at the end?

Hi,
I implement an IDOC/EDI solution where some invoices are sent directly to FI module using INVOIC FI message, in SAP R/3 4.7.
Normally, when such invoice is posted manually in the system (e.g. tcode FB01) the users enter vendor line item at the beginning of the FI document(item 001).
When the invoice is posted from IDOC, the vendor line item is always appended by the system as the last item in the FI document which is 'unnatural' for the end users.
After tracing the code in function module IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_FI
I can see that vendor line item is counted as '1' in internal table beleg_daten[] throught the processing of IDOC. But at the end, in FORM VERARBEITUNG_BELEGENDE, when data is moved from beleg_daten[] to fb01_daten[] and vendor data is always appended as the last line item to be posted here.
Do you have any similar experience and an idea how to influence this behaviour, to get the vendor line item
posted as item 001 in FI document, from IDOC?
Kind regards,
Michal Kunze

Hello Michal,
looking to the logic of LIEDIF31 i'm in doubt if you can change this behaviour. the logic loops through the line items of the IDOC, preparing to splitt the document at 949 line items. So they have to add the single amounts for the vendor line - to get a balanced document.
Regards Wolfgang

Vendor Line Item by Profit Center

Dear All
We are trying to make a report for Vendor line items by profit center (Based on General Ledger view). There is standard report available in New GL in General Ledger Information System>Line Item>Open Items Payable by Profit Center. But in this report we need some other fields which are not available like due date etc
This report is developed through Drill Down form based report (T.Code FGI4 for Form and FGI1 for Report). There is a standard form type available for creating the form and subsequently report. Wecheck the FAGLPOS_APPRE and all the fields which we need are available in this structure but how to add these fields in the form type.
If there is any other way to get the vendor line item by profit center (General Ledger View) then please let us know.

If you are trying to view such a report through transaction code FBL1N, then I would suggest you follow the solution described in this thread below:
Re: Add field Net Due Date at the selection field in FBL1N t.code
Also to view profit center wise, use the dynamic selections in FBL1N to select profit center.
Regards,
Elias

Profir Center Update for Vendor Line Item

Hi,
While entering an inter company document, cost center is required field for the expense line item. The system is picking up the profit center based on the cost center. However, while saving the document I am getting a error message that you can not post to profit center XX in company code 2. The profit center is only assigned to company code 1 (KE52) and it is not to be assigned to company code 2. Ideally the vendor line item should be assigned to dummy profit center maintained in config but system is picking the profit center assigned to expense line item. The following entery is being passed and the document type is AB. Document Splitting is active.
Expenses A/c. Dr - company code 1 - PC - XX
To Vendor            - company code 2
can anyone help me with the same?

Hi,
Validations are in 3 steps (Mostly Inter-company transaction fetch this validation in sequence)
1) Derivation Rule
2) Default
3) Dummy
Option 1:
T-code: 3KEI
setup default profit centre by company code and GL Account
if above does not resolve your issue then also setup option 2
Option 2:
Create substitution rule on document completion level
If G/L account is (B/S) XXXXXX u2013 XXXXXX and company code is 2
   then PC = 2
End if
try first in test system
regards,
Prashant Rane

Vendor line item analysis.

Hi,
This company enters into a variety of transactions with a vendor, say, it buys materials, pays advance for purchase of asset, buys some services. The user wants to be able to display the vendor line items segregated into (1) materials (2) assets and (3) services.
Please help me with your ideas to achieve this.\
Thanks
Muru

Hi,
You will have to create three different vendors with three different Vendor Groups as
(1) materials
(2) assets and
(3) services
You can maintain the common short text for all the three vendors, so that you can get the consolidated balance for the single vendor who is supplying all three types of transactions.
Regards.
Amit

Missmatch vendor line items and vendor clearing

Hello all,
Im faced with a strange issue that i need some help on.
The transaction F-44 is very common in problems mainly due to wrong selection criteria but in this case the problem goes behond that.
I have a vendor with a total balance in its line items (FBL1N). - Example: 1.000u20AC
The line items has, in the vendor line, a base amount and tax amount showing the following
Base amount: 1.000
Tax: 200
The document generate a amount of 200 in the VAT GL account correctly.
The vendor line items shows me a total of 1.000u20AC but when i try to clear the open items i get a strange value of 1.200 showned.
Its like the total Base + Tax is being carried in for the clearing transaction.
I just need to compensate for the vendor balance it shows different value causing a missmatch in the totals corresponding to the amount of Tax I have in each line item.
Im using a special GL indicator because its an Asset Supplier.
Any idea what can this be related to?
Have you ever had a vendor balance showing one amount and when you try to clear it it shows another one?
Any help is highly appreciated.
Glytch

Hi Filipe,
I am having same problem as you.
Have you got the answer for this issue?
Can you share with me?
Thanks in advance.

GL Line Item Display vs. Vendor Line Item Display

Hi Gurus,
I have parked a document with a vendor line item. When generating
standrd GL line item reports (FBL3N or S_ALR_87012282), the line items
for my parked document are not displayed. But if I generate the vendor
line item report (FBL1N), this parked document is displayed.
Please confirm if this is a standard behaviour and why.
Thanks and best regards

HI
I knew that, a complete FI document wont give such error thats why i asked for Document type ,You please note each document type has its own characteristic.
Hope your query closed
Thanks

Automatic Business Area Derivation Rule for Vendor Line Item in MIRO

Hello Experts,
We trying to use Business Area concept for our client.
I have completed all configuration setting for the business are derivation like
1. Creation of Business Area
2. Assign Business area to Plant / Division (OMJ7)
3. Business area determination from sales area (TVTA)
4. Business Area by Sales Area
5. Checked Field Status Group for Customer and Vendor Reconciliation Account
It is working for for compelete sales process and in Procurement cylce it is picking business for MIGO transaction both the line items.
But
In MIRO (Purchase invoice posting) it is automatically taking Business area to the GR/IR line item and it not taking Business area for the vendor line item (automatically)
I comes know that there is a business area derivation rule for this to happen automatically.
Can you please propose the soulution for the automatic derivation of business in MIRO for vendor line item.
Regards,
Chalapathi

Hi,
I do mot think there is a BA derivation rule for MIRO.
The best you can do is:
1. Use a user exit or enhancement point for deriving the BA from the GR/IR line and populate that in the vendor line
or
2. You make BA as a mandatory field in the field status group for the vendor reconciliation account. This will then force the user update the BA. We use this option. This is so because at times, the vendor item may need a different business area than the GR/IR line.
Cheers.

Segment Field in vendor line item

Hello Guru,
we have activated new gl functionality with doucment splitting . but we are not able to view the segement filed in vendor line item and customer line item in different reports.
how we can pool that field in variouse report in instead using Zreport.
Thanks and Advance
Laxmi narayan

Hi,
whe we are entering the vendor line item we can enter the Fund and fund Center, our segment will be derived from the fund ( we have done it in a substitution, if the segment is empty we derive it from the fund) and in BSEG table we can see that the segment is filled correctly. But we cannot change it because this fields segment don't appear in the screen. We have reviewed the SAPMF05A 0332 Screen (screen that we can see when we are entering the vendor line item and we push in "More data" button) but the segment field don't appear.
Thanks in advance,
Sap Userr

GL & Vendor Line Item Display

Dear Forum,
The users want to display the Vendor Codes in the GL Line Item Display to reflect the corresponding vendor related to the expense in the GL line item and also want the GL Code to be displayed in the Vendor Line Item to reflect the nature of expense incurred thru that vendor. Are there any standard reports that could provide the details in this manner. Oherwsie how could we change the layout of the GL and Vendor line item Reports.
Thanks for the help.
Regards,
Moderator: Please, search SDN before posting. This question has been answered 2-3 times only last week, not speaking about more recent period (as already mentioned by our SAP colleague)

HEllo,
In flb3n you can do this by using the offsetting account logic which is explained in details in the SAP Note 112312.
This way you can see vendor/customer information in the Line items report for GL ACcounts.
This issue has been discussed several times before. If you search the forum you'll see the replies.
REgards,
REnan

Vendor line item display with internal order

In Vendor line item display is it possibe to see details of the line item of offsetting account .
For example a expense account is debited & vendor account is credited .At the time expense account debit a internal order has been assigned in line item.
User wants to see the vendor line item display ( T code FBL1N) with details of internal order appearing in open line items display etc .
Is this possible .I created a layout with order as a field but order does not show any values in the line display of vendor.
Please revert back if this can be possibe.
Thanks
Manoj

with a combination of notes
112312 - Line item - Display of offsetting ac information
373268 - Line item - new display field
569939 - Line item - Open FI - Absolute amounts
1034354 - FAGLL03 - Display of offsetting account information
you should be able to get it there.

Transaction/Movement type on the vendor line item

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for