Transformation fields getting misplaced

I am using DSO --> 66 data fields, 2 key fields. When I create the transformation I get all the fields. But when I save the transformation I am loosing some fields from the transformation. What can be the error? When I look at the detail view, I see the corresponding target fields where the transformation is missing is mapped to unwanted fields (i.e. 1 transformation field mapped to n no. of target fields). I recreated the transformation but still getting the same error.
Please help me.

Hi,
My problem has been solved , i upgraded my SP level 17 to 19, By this i overcome that problem.
Be sure to upgrade SP level latest patch if and so
->if your transformation mapping to one to and many
-> Even though if you activate it will show inprocess
Otherwise 17 patch is enough.

Similar Messages

Can anyone explain what the field-get command in ABAP does

Hi,
I have just come across the command field-get in some code. I've never seen this command before and there doesn't seem to be any help or documentation on this.
Can anyone advise how this command works?
Thanks,
Ruby

Ignore question.

Field.get(Object obj) now returning null with Generics (Java 5.0) ??

Hello,
I'm currently using Java 5.0 (especially for the Generics part) on a new Java/J2EE project, but having a strange issue with code working previously in a Java 1.4 project.
Below is an overriding of the toString() method provided by the Object class which allow me to view nicely in debug (dev. mode) the contents of my Transfer Objects (all the TO's must extend this ATO abstract class).
Previously this code displayed me something like:
[field1 => value1, field2 => value2] ... for a TO (sort of "Javabean") having e.g. two String fields with values initialized to "value1" (resp. "value2").
But unfortunately, this does (or seems) not to work anymore, having such display :
[field1 => null, field2 => null]I tried to debug, and the problem is that the call fieldValue = field.get(this); returns null while it should returns the actual value of the field.
I thing it it strongly related to Generics, but could not at the moment found how/why it does not work.
May someone help...? Thanks.
public abstract class ATO {
    // Reflection for field value display
    public String toString() {
        StringBuffer sb = new StringBuffer("[");
        MessageFormat mf = new MessageFormat("{0} => {1}, ");
        Field[] fields = this.getClass().getDeclaredFields();
        for (int i = 0; i < fields.length; i++) {
            Field field = (Field) fields;
String fieldName = field.getName();
Object fieldValue = null;
try {
fieldValue = field.get(this);
} catch (IllegalArgumentException e) {
} catch (IllegalAccessException e) {
mf.format(new Object[] { fieldName, fieldValue }, sb, null);
if (sb.length() > 1) {
sb.setLength(sb.length() - 2);
sb.append("]");
return sb.toString();

ejp wrote:
Field field = (Field) fields;
This cast is unnecessary.
Effectively, I haven't noticed it yet. Fixed.
} catch (IllegalArgumentException e) {
} catch (IllegalAccessException e) {
}Either the field value really is null or you are getting one of these exceptions which you are ignoring. Never write empty catch blocks.That's true, I missed something. Fixed with some code to log the eventual exceptions.
Thanks for you answer.

Assignment Field Get Cleared(blank) During Automatic Payment Run(F110)

Hi all,
We have a senario that during the creation of AP invoice, the Profit Center is entered in Assignment field ( BSEG-ZUONR) in FB01.In the invoice document the assignment field value correctly copied into Profit center (BSEG-PRCTR) based on a subsititution rule.
But during the payment document run (F110) the assignment field is get cleared (Blank).and in REGUP table, the Assignment field get populated correctly.
By displaying the payment document using transaction code FB03, the assingment fields is empty.ie field BSEG-ZUONR is empty. .
We have checked all the subsititution rules defined in the system and none of these causing the problem. We suspect there are some hidden subsititution or configurations in SAP that affect the assignment. We also checked the sort key is not the cause of it.
Have anyone encounter the same scenario why the Assignment field get cleared(blank) in Payment document. Please kindly share.
Regards
Riaz

Hi,
I think you are trying to Run Automatic Payment Programme with Check Management and you want to Print check and payment summary.
Kindly check if you have defined SAP Scripts in FBZP Payment Method in Company Code.Select a Co Code and double click on payment method eg C-Cheque, their is a section called FORM DATA you need to input Scripts for the same so that the Payment Programme prints output as defined in the SAP Script for Checks and payment advice
Regards
Rahul

If I resize the Standard form the userdefined field get disturd

Hi Experts,
If i re size the standard form the user defined fields get disturb. Is there any solution for this issue?
-Regards
Vikas

Hi Vikas,
You can capture the resize event and reposition/redimension your items according to a reference item (usually the recommended approach).
Please note that B1 attempts to reposition the items automatically so some items might not need you to adjust them.
Good luck.
Best regards,
Pedro Magueija

Display full autosuggest list when field gets focus

I've searched through the the Spry topics but did not find a
solution to my question.
How does one make the Spry autosuggest drop down to
automatically display with an unfiltered list when the associated
text field gets focus? The best I can tell this option isn't a
normal part of the Spry autosuggest widget and would require a
custom tweak.
I'd also like to put in a suggestion that this ability be a
built in option for the autosuggest widget.

AFAIK, there isn't a way to do that in a PDF form.

'D' Value in UPDMOD field getting lost in Transformation,Delete not working

Hello all,
We are using this datasource 0PU_IS_PS_32 for Funds management, the datasource has UPDMOD field in it, which is basically the 0RECORDMODE. So when they delete the document on R/3 side we can pick up the delete.
Now this is what is happening in the delta infopackage, I get the delat records in the delta infopackage and I see a "D" in the UPDMOD field, but that value of D is getting lost when i load the data from PSA to the DSO through transofrmation by using DTP.
After the request is loaded in DSO, before activating the request I check in New Data table and the field does not have a value of "D" anymore so when I activate the request the system does not know that those records are "D" delete records and so the records are not getting deleted from DSO.
Has anyone faced this before, how can I fix it. The transformation is just one to one mapping no routines or formulas of any kind.
Thanks for your help in advance.

Hi,
It is mandatory that u map upmode to 0recordmode. In the rule group there will be 2 groups. One will be ur normal mapping and other should be used to map 0recordmode
Regards,
Raghavendra.

Transformation - Fields Missing!!

Hello Experts,
I am facing a strange issue in the transformation beteen DSO to Cube.
My DSO Contains 148 fields while in the transformation I can see only 131 fields.
IN thedevelopment Box the transformation appears fine but in the Acceptace box the mentioned problem
occurs.I tried regenerating the export datasource, activated & transported the DSO but all in vain.
PLease help.
Thanks,
Suyog

Hi,
Go to RSA1--> Data sources Choose source system as BI and find for data source with 8<DSO name>. Once you get the data source ,select change from context menu --> go to Fields tab and check under column Transfer (5th Column) for all fields . If any field is unchecked then check and activate data source to see all fields in Cube transformations.
hope it helps...
regards,
Raju

My PDFs with form fields get "There was an error opening this document. The file is damaged and could not be repaired." on anothers computer, PC and MAC

Im creating PDFs through InDesign and using Acrobat Pro 9 to add fields. I save them to allow ADobe Reader people to use them. Everything works fine on Pro and Reader on my end with a PC as well as someone elses PC. But one person using Mac said some forms work and some dont. Those that dont get the error "There was an error opening this document. The file is damaged and could not be repaired." Ive resaved them and made sure they work and same problem. There is nothing overly coplex about the PDFs either, a date field at the most. They are using Reader 9.1.
I found out the other day that one person who can open them adds info to them saves them and send over to that other person and cannot open any of them after they have been edited, same error. He even tried on a PC and still gets it.
I dont know what to do. I know it has to be on his end and not mine. What else can I suggest to him??

It sounds like they are using an earlier version of Acrobat or Reader, though you said Reader 9.1. If you add some features in AA9 that are new, it appears that earlier versions see the new features as damaged files. At least that is my guess. Try using Reduce File Size or PDF Optimize to save to an earlier version and see if that helps. The other option is that you are getting them messed up in e-mail because many client look at PDF files as ascii and do not encrypt them. In that case force the encryption. You can also send them in ZIP form.

Blank spaces at the end of an IDoc text field get lost when posted to R/3

Hi Guys,
I am facing the following issue:
In an XML file-to-Idoc scenario, there are spaces at the end of a text field in the inbound XML file, which I can see when I open the inbound file with a text editor like notepad, and they are kept after XI mapping is executed (I can see them in message mapping simulator). However, it seems that these spaces get lost once the IDoc is posted to SAP R/3 and they are not visible on SAP R/3 side.
Do you have any idea ? Thanks.
Best Regards,
Evaggelos Gkatzios

That means SAP is removing the spaces from IDoc fields, where you spaces are not allowed. Does it create any problem?
Thanks,
Nabendu.

Payment terms and Due date field gets emptied after residual clearing

Hi
There is advance of Rs.50000 in Vendor ledger and Invoice of Rs.200000 (with payment term - G019)
I cleared these two line items (residual clearing). One new line item got created of Rs.150000. When i saw that line item, i saw that there payment term field and due date field got emptied. My requirement is that the original payment term entered in initial invoice document (of Rs.200000) should automatically get populated in new line item of Rs.150000.
How to fulfill this requirement?

Thanks for the prompt reply.
I wanted to ask one more thing. Same way when i do partial clearing (not residual), is it possible to populate the invoice's due date in advance line item. One link is that my invoice reference gets populated advance line item. So i want due date (not payment term) also to get populated in advance line item.
Please help.
Edited by: Deepak Agrawal on Jul 29, 2011 11:43 AM

One field gets cleared from ALV to internal table

I have an ALV grid in a view in which i append a row and add some data. This is giving me a very strange problem.
I appended a row in the ALV and then filled up the data in the row. I filled three fields, two of them dates and one a decimal field. Then i saved this data. No problems here.
Now the next time i come on this ALV grid view, i see the previously saved row. I now append another row and fill in some data again. This is where the surprise comes. Out of the two date fields, the first date field is losing its value and is getting cleared when i get the ALV data in an internal table...(using the following code)
node_et_indices_1->get_static_attributes_table( IMPORTING table = lt_indice ).
the lt_indice has the following structure...
field           type
MANDT     MANDT
BUKRS     BUKRS
ZZINDICE     ZEAGR_INDICE
ZZITEM     CHAR3
ZZDESC    CHAR40
ZZINVAL    DATS 8
ZZFIMVAL DATS 8
ZZVATR     DEC
ZZUATR     DEC
ERNAM     ERNAM
AEDAT     AEDAT
ZCORRIG CHAR1
WAERS     WAERS
out of these, the fields zzinval, zzfimval and zzvatr are being populated from webdynpro and the rest of the fields (including the key fields) are populated in the internal table later and then saved to the database.
After executing the above statement, the value in ZZINVAL is 00000000, while on the screen i have entered 01.02.2007. The same does not apply to ZZFIMVAL which holds the value 28.02.2007 as entered on the screen. ZZVATR also holds the correct value entered.
Any ideas why only one of the fields might be getting cleared like this?
The problem does not occur when i am saving only a single row from the ALV.
Please help!!
regards,
Priyank

I have checked that the node itself is not containing the value.
How and what can i check for this. I have mapped the ALV in different views similarly and they are working?
Any ideas on where can i check ??
regards,
Priyank

Blank field getting converted into wrong date

Dear All,
I have one date field in SAP table in which there are some entries and some blank entries.
when Proxy is sending this data from ECC blank entries are converted into 00000000 and through XI in file
this
00000000 entry for date getting converted into wrong date like 30.11.0002 in file.
I have taken data type as string do I need to take data type as date.
My doubt is if there is no entry in table why it is convertng to 00000000 and after passing from XI why it is converting into
30.11.0002 .
Regards

Hi ,
My date format like this
source --yyyyMMDD
target-DD.MM.YYYY
so if
source is
00000000
should comes like this
target
00.00.0000
but it is converting into
30.11.0002
every where in file values for 00000000 is coming like 30.11.0002
Regards

How does ISM02 Field get updated in tcode COR6

Hi,
I have a problem where the Field ISM02 is getting updated only for the first partial confirmation and from the next time it is updating 0 in the filed When we run the tcode COR6.
can any one help me know the functionality or conditions for the field ISM02 to get updated in the table AFRU.
This problem is happening only when we try to confirm for the Work centers which are not assigned to the production order..

Hi,
The example field does not get populated and won't be for two reasons:
- The Xpmd products don't do it and we want to keep the same XML schema than the others so that FlexPMD reports remain compatible with third party tools (like the PMD Hudson plugin, and XSL script)
- That would have a high impact on the report size. Imagine that you have 2000+ violations in your report...
That being said, it will be possible to retrieve the example section from the Flash Builder plugin in the outline view.
Best regards,
Xavier

Sales Order is getting created without quantity field getting populated?

Hi All,
I am creating sales order with the help of IDocs. Here I am using the standard function module IDOC_INPUT_ORDERS.
But, when I execute this function module idocs are getting generated successfully but the quantity field is not getting updated. It is getting populates as Zero.
With in this function module there is a perform to check_idoc_orders, when the data flow comes to this point quantity field MENGE is getting cleared.
So just want to know what could be the reason why quantity field is getting cleared.
Raghu

Hello
Q1 )
If I change option 1 or 2 :
1 User decides on creation if material is missing
Answer:If Material is not Created the system wont allow to add you that material until unless you create the material master created.I am considering here that you don't have material master
2 Creation even though no material is available
Answer:It will allow you to create the work order.i am considering here that you don't have sufficient stock.
Q2) what should be the expected Status for Option 1 or 2.
Before Config it was showing
Status is showing Mat.availability not checked ( MANC ).
After Option 1 or 2, Expected Status ?
Answer: You need to enter value 02 on the Availability Check field on the MRP3 tab of Material Master via TC MM02.
you will be get Material committed MACM after Saving the Order.
Br
Rakesh

Transformation fields getting misplaced

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for