Transport Rule "Disclaimer" not updating...

I did a simple edit earlier today and added a single line of text to the Transport Rule "Disclaimer" and it refuses to update. I tried restarting the Hub Transport service but that didn't solve the issue.
I've sent test emails to both internal and external addresses with the same results. I've also attempted to disable the rule just to see if i could get any changes to apply in a timely manner however I'm still getting the disclaimer on emails.
Any thoughts?

Hi,
From your description, you can use Get-TransportRule command or EMC->Organization Configuration->Hub Transport->Transport
Rules to get the state, scope and priority of this transport rule:
1.
Whether the rule is enabled or disabled:   Only enabled rules are applied. When a rule is disabled, the rule does not lose its priority. However, the rule
is not included in the evaluation process.
2.
Message scope:   The first check performed by rules agents is whether a message falls within the scope of the agent. Transport rules aren't applied to all
types of messages.
3.
Priority:   For messages that fall within the scope of the rules agent, the agent starts processing rules based on rule priority in ascending order. Rules
that have lower priority are applied first. Transport rule priority values range from 0 to n-1, where n is the total number of transport rules. Only enabled rules are applied, regardless of priority. You can change the priority of rules by using the Exchange
Management Console or the Exchange Management Shell
If the issue is not solved, you can disable this transport rule and create a new transport rule to check the result.
Hope it helps. If the issue still occurs, please let us know.
Thanks
Sophia Xu
TechNet Community Support
I am having the same problem, and so far beyond restarting the transport service there have been no useful answers, including this one.
The above response doesn't even relate to the question and none of your points apply when dealing with a simple text edit to an existing rule that was already working.
If the Transport rule function is so unstable as to require it be rebuilt for every text edit, then it simply does not function as designed.

Similar Messages

After transport, changes are not updating

hi..........
We are configured two clients as master client(009) and test client(008) in one DEV machine.
i performed one transport from 009 to 008.( i released through scc1 and imported in 008 through scc1) it's transported successfully.
but our consultant saying that, those changes is not updating in client 008.
i performed so many transports to 008 and also to prd. before and after.
then why the changes were not updating in 008, to that particular request?he created another request with the same issue and i transported it.again same problem. is there any thing to check from basis side?
(4.7E,mssql,widows 2003 server)
Please help me.................

Hello,
Check the transport log. Even it is saying Sucessfully Imported, just open it, read it.
And check the size of the transport request also.
And another option is add this particular request with another request and transport it. Check for anything is happening....
I don't think anything balance has left from basis side....
Note: Points always encourage me to reply !!

Transport Rule does not appear to be working

hi,
I have an exchange 2013 environment. i have a requirement to intercept inbound emails from external senders addressed to [email protected] and forward it to a single recipient.
we have an internal distribution list already using [email protected] that has 30 members.
I have setup the following rule
apply this rule if: the recipient is [email protected] and the sender is:outside of the organization
Do the following:redirect the message to [email protected]
Priority 0
Audit : not specified
mode: enforce
when i send a test email from externally all 30 people still recieve the mail. i have tried restarting the transport service. Can anyone please help me as i am struggling to see what might be wrong.
thanks
Paul

Hi paul ,
From your description i came to understand that the E-mails from the external senders addressed to the distribution group [email protected] should have to be redirected to [email protected]
As per my knowledge ,There are two ways to achieve your scenario one is via transport rule and another one is via DL restriction .
via transport rule
1.If you wanted to check whether the transport rule is applied to that message or not you should have to do the message tracking first .
2.Then you have to enable the pipeline tracing log for the particular recipient in our exchange organisation . With the help of that logs you can able to identify what are all the transport rules has applied to the messages received by the that recipient
Note: Pipeline tracing is only for troubleshooting purpose , once you have completed your troubleshooting please turn it off .
Via DL restriction :
On that particular DL If you go to the option delivery management you can able to set the restrictions .
only senders inside my organization - This is the option where you can restrict who can able send an email to this DL and it would be some of the internal recipients or all the internal recipients .
Senders inside and outside of my organization - This is the option where you can restrict who can able send an email to this DL and it would be some of the internal recipients or all the internal recipients or some of the external recipients
or all the external recipients .
you should have to create a contact in case if you wanted to provide mail sending permission to this DL only for some external recipients
Please reply me if you have any queries .
Regards
S.Nithyanandham
Thanks S.Nithyanandham

Transport queue is not updating?

Hi Gurus,
We have a 4 system landscape Dev->Test->Quality->PRD. After a transport is released from SE03 why the import queues are not update with the released request, except the "Test" Enviornment not the other systems in my landscapre (Quality & PRD)? but once the request has been imported into the "Test" enviornment, the Quality import queue and PRD import queue are updated? why not, once its released in "Dev" in the first place?
Thanks in Advance
Ahamed

Dear Guru,
According to setup in my landscape, my Test system is the source system for the "Quality" & "Production". from this source system a delivery route is configured for the other two systems ( Quality & Production)
Note from: help.sap.com
When you set up a delivery route, you are making sure that all change requests that are imported into the routeu2019s source system are automatically flagged for import into the routeu2019s target system.
Thanks for your support, I appreaciate it.
Ahamed

[Business Rules] Rules engine not updating my Fact Result as expected.

I have a Fact type implemented as a Java class, named Commission with the following properties: age(int), area(int), amt(double):
In the Java application I set the age to 30 and area to 3:
Commission comm = new Commission();
comm.setAge(30);
comm.setArea(3)Now I have a set of rules defined in the ruleAuthor where in, if the age is > 20 and area is between 1 and 5 then the business rule engine should set the Amt field to .3
But when I run the rules engine:
ruleSession.executeRuleset(...);
ruleSession.callFunctionWithArgument("assert", comm);
ruleSession.callFunction("run");
double commamt = comm.getAmt(); //this value returns (0) as if the rules engine did not fire the rule and did not change the amt field to .3When i get the comm.getAmt(), the value is zero and not 0.3 which is the expected result.
I wonder what's wrong, I only followed and patterned the instructions and code that came with Oracle Business Rules CarRental Example and/or the example that came in the Business Rule ViewLet.

Hi Phil,
I tried your suggestion. But it still does not work.
I don't if this would help but this is how I defined my rules:
1. I created a Java class file as a Fact Definition. Compiled it and stored it into a jar file.
2. Copied the .jar file to a remote machine where OracleAS is installed.
3. I run the ruleAuthor (browser) and specified a ruleRepository file.
4. Specified the jar file where the Fact Definition (Java file) is.
5. Created Ruleset and Rules
6. Save the Dictionary.
7. Copied the generated rulesRepository on to my local hard drive (remote).
8. Create and Run the Rule-Enabled Java application. ruleRepository points to the ruleRepository file generated by ruleAuthor and copied to my local hard drive.
Maybe there is something wrong with how I packaged the Java Fact Definition?

Adapter engine nodes(In RWB) for CCMS tree are not updated

Hi Experts,
We are implementing CCMS monitoring on XI-700 SP12.But when we are trying to check monitoring node for runtime work bench (alert categories and Rules) its not updated in ccms tree and not collecting updated data.Can you please help us on this.
Thanks and Regards
Suveer

Have you checked the Audit log in Runtime Workbench? Using it, you could come to know which module of the receiver channel went in error. Are you doing some user mapping or is it a standard one? The problem could be related to the undeployed mapping or mismatch in the format.
Regards,
Prateek

Exchange 2010 BCC Transport Rule skipped- Logging required

Hi,
we have some transport rules created on Exchange 2010 SP2 U4 that for each message sent to a specific mailbox the message is bcc'ed to some internal users. The rules work all fine, but we have a case were in some occasions a transport rule is not getting
applied and the message is not delivered to the bcc users but only to the initial recipient mailbox. The transport rule in question has Priority "0" and we have no conflicting trasnport rules
Message tracking log is not so helpful since it just shows that the message delivered successfully, whereas in the case that the rule is being applied message tracking shows the message being deferred to the other recipients as well.
Unfortunately we were not able to reproduce the issue since it occurs in an ad-hoc basis therefore enabling pipeline tracing will not be of much help.
Please advise, what logging shall we enable on what level to be able to identify the cause and the location of the logs generated in each case (Event Viewer or C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange Server\V14\Logging or C:\Program Files\Microsoft\Exchange
Server\V14\TransportRoles\Logs).
Thank you very much in advance.

Hi,
If you want to ensure that the transport agent is doing its job within a message, we can enable
Pipeline tracing feature which allows us to create an exact snapshot of a whole message before and after it encounters each transport agent. Each step of the process is kept in a directory for troubleshooting reasons.
Before you enable pipeline tracing, you need to specify the sender's email address you want to monitor. Pipeline tracing is designed to log messages sent from a specific email address. Then we can use the following command to enable it:
Set-TransportServer Server1 -PipelineTracingEnabled $True -PipelineTracingSenderAddress "<>" -PipelineTracingPath <LocalFilePath>
For more information about pipeline tracing, please refer to:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb125018(v=exchg.141).aspx
Understanding Transport Agents (Part 2)
http://www.msexchange.org/articles-tutorials/exchange-server-2007/planning-architecture/understanding-transport-agents-part2.html
Hope it helps.
Regards,
Winnie Liang
TechNet Community Support

Update rules are not active

update rules are not active when transported to quality.
what can possibly be the error. where to check and correct this issue ?
thanks,
Amit

Amit,
In your update rules ,i hope there some start routine of update routines couls be there and those rotines didn't transported successfully .Check your update rules in DEV
Regards
Prasad

Territory not updated in Account even account data satisfy Territory Rule

Hi,
I am working on territory management and am able to successfully establish relationship between Accounts & Territory. I can see the terrtories to which account is assigned under 'Territories' assignment block on Account overview screen.
But now if I create/ change any account data(which was not satisfying territory rule earlier) to match the territory rule, the territory is not updated even after running the report 'CRM_TERRMAN_PROC_REL'(delta).
E.g. Suppose We a territory 'ABC' with territory Rule for all accounts as- postal code between 20000 & 30000. and this rule is already released.
Now when i create an account with postal code 20569(or change an existiong account with some other postal code to a number between 20000 & 30000), It should be assigned to this territory ABC. But this relationship is not established at all even after report 'CRM_TERRMAN_PROC_REL' is executed.
Please suggest if need to implement any SAP Note or any configuration/customization is missing to achieve this functionalty.
Regards,
Amit

Hi Amit
Please be advised that when territory rule contains sales area attributes, ONLY sales area relationships are build up an NO accounts relationships are built.
To build up account relationship you need to use BP attributes in your rule, so please check that you have done this, and then run the report again.
Account relationship will show all accounts that fall under thisterritory and it will not consider the sales area attribute, therefore
it will not be filtered based on the sales area attribute that you mention.
Please see the online documentation:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_crm70/helpdata/en/b9/47d63da3a64942b3ce93b94
f731c11/frameset.htm
I hope this inforamtion helps.
Best Regards
Gavin

Why the PO action history is not updating when i perform the vacation rules

Hi,
Can any one explain why the action history is not updating when performed the vacation rules using the below example
Example: A >B>C>D are in the approval hierarchy here I have defined the vacation rules by login to the user C here I selected the item type as “All” and delegated to D.
Now the buyer “A” has sent the document for approval. The user “B” can successfully reserve funds and approved the document. Now the document is automatically delegated to D. Here D can open the document from open notifications and approved the document. Now when I checked the Action history here I cannot find the performed name D who has actually approved the document.
Note:we are using the 11.5.10.2 version.
The Action History in the following manner
Seq Action Performed By
================================
4 Approve C
3 Forward B
2 Reserved B
1 Forward A
0 Submit A
From the above action history why the user D name is not showing. Can any one let me know ASAP?
Regards,
Keivn.
Edited by: user10960960 on May 5, 2009 3:36 AM

When you set up the vacation rule, if you simply delegate the ownership to D, then C retains the ownership and the approval occurs with C's limits. And hence D is treated as the approver.
If you transfer the ownership, then C is out of the picture. The notification goes to D and when he/she approves, D's limits kick in and he will be seen as approver.
Hope this helps,
Sandeep Gandhi

Auto Run Program not updating Settlement Rules for few WBS elements

Hi,
Addition of settlement rules for OPEX WBS.
In producion system, two jobs are running daily for generating settlement rules of WBS elements but, all WBS elements are not updating with Settlement rules.
It is becoming a problem in the Period end while doing the settlement. Currently we are updating the settlement rule manually.
We have investigated and found the following WBS element with Profile name are not updating Settlement rule.
H-U0DU0204DE-EX-J0 - HHDC01
H-N0U00ULD01-P1-D1-W2 - 000090
H-U0DU0204DE-EX-U0-T1-OB - HHDC01
H-U0DU0204DE-EX-U1-W1-ON - HHDC01
H-U0DU0204DE-EX-U2-W1-ON - HHDC01
H-U0DU0204DE-EX-I0-E1 - HHDC01
H-U0DU0204DE-EX-I0-B1 -HHDC01
H-U1DU0204DE-EX-U0-W1-ON - HHDC01
Job Names :
ZFPD_UK_SETTLEMENT_RULE_GEN
ZFPD_NO_SETTLEMENT_RULE_GEN
Please suggest on this issue
Regards

Hi,
I suppose these are background jobs. Usually there is an issue with background jobs that are run for a custom developed program. Not sure why that happens. Even i faced this issue with a couple of jobs in my system. I have still not found out the reason as to why this happens. There might be a possibility that these projects were being processed in the foreground by some user and hence they were omitted from the run.
I would suggest you to consult your technical guys on this.
Regards,
Gokul

0SD_C03 transfer rule and update rules do not exist in BI Content

I am working on SAP BI 7.0 support level 16 and BI Content 703 support level 9.
I am not finding these objects in BI Content for the Sales Overview Infocube 0SD_C03:
Update Rules do not exist for 2LIS_11_VAKON,
2LIS_11_VASCL, 2LIS_11_VASTH, 2LIS_11_VASTI, 2LIS_11_V_SCL,
2LIS_11_V_SSL, 2LIS_12_VCSCL, 2LIS_13_VDKON.
Transfer rule does not exist for
2LIS_13_VDITM, but exists for all other DS.
7 Transformations exist only for:
2LIS_13_VDITM
Can somone help me out with why this is so? Which datasources are to be used for 0SD_C03, 3.x or 7?
This is an urgent requirement.
Regards,
Sony

Most of the problem has gotten solved by our upgrading to BI Content level 17.
The others, i made a direct mapping of some of the transfer rules manually.
It is working fine now.
Thanks for the replies.
Sony

0PS_C02 update rules are not getting activated when i install 4rm BI conten

Hi All,
In BI Dev. sys for PS module- Project System - Dates 0PS_C02 cube- update rules are not getting activated when i install from the business content and its giving the error " IC=0PS_C02 IS=0PS_DAT_PRJ error when checking the update rules Message no. RSAU461" .
I deleted the inactive update rules(6 nos) and installed again from BI Content, then the same issue raising.
Can anyone help me out as i stuck up with this to move to go-live.
Thanks,
Sakali

Hi Vassu,
here are some of the reasons for getting error in update rules activation.
1. Check the formula or routines that are used in Update rules and check is there any syntax errors.
2. check whether the mappings are correct or not.
3. check the info objects which ur used for mapping are in active or not..
(or) if the info object may be deleted which ur using for mappings.
Thanks
Sai Chand.

PreludeCC and PRemiere Pro CC will not update error: " log Transport 2"

PreludeCC and PRemiere Pro CC will not update . update gets to 62% and then quits with the following error code "Log Transport 2"
System
OS 10.9
MacPro 3,1
All other apps do update.

HI Steve & Perry,
Have you tried restarting the machine and applying the updates again ? If yes, are you still getting the same error message ? If yes , could you please share a screen shot of the error that you get ?
Cheers,
Kartikay Sharma

3.x Update rules does not appear in std 0IC_C03 business content

Hi,
We are using BI 7.0.
When trying to install business content update rules for the cube 0IC_C03 (DATA FLOW BEFORE), the three update rules are not appearing in the screen for installation.
Instead , I'm getting three Transformations !! But I need 3.x Update rules only.
Note : The data source used are of type 3.x ONLY.

Hi,
When you Create the update rules manually by default Keyfigures will be set to no-update. You have to propose the rules as you want and it depends on the requirement. And for 0IC_C03 Inventory Cube, almost all the Kfigs are updated based on Routines.
So it is better to Install from BI Content.
Replicate your Datasources. Then Install Transfer rules,and then Install update rules.
Hope this Helps,
Regards
Karthik

Transport Rule "Disclaimer" not updating...

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for