Transporting a Structure: Sending & Receiving Systems Don't Match?

I copied a Z1 structure to a Z5 structure in system A(sending system). Because System B(receiving system) already had a similar structure Z1 I did not want to overwrite. The only difference between both Z1s in system A and system B were some include fields appended at the end of the structure. However, when I transport the copied Z5 from system A to system B, the resulting Z5 structure in system B looks like the Z1 structure in system B that I was trying to avoid overwriting. I transported three different ways so far, as a directory object, table definition, and table. No luck, the Z5 structure keeps wanting to look like the Z1 structure in the receiving system.
Anybody know whats going on?
Thank-You.

Hi,
+
B were some include fields appended at the end of the structure.
+
Have you using Include structure for new fields? If yes whether have you transported this include structure?
a®

Similar Messages

Outlook 2011 send/receive schedules don't work

I have to manually send/receive email since I upgraded to OS LION. Schedules don't work anymore, whatever I tried. Anyone with the same problem?

I use the following settings in Outlook and they work without problem. It may be that you will need to delete the account and set it up again. If you do delete it make sure that you back up any emails that are on your computer.
Your Name
Email address: Full btinternet email address
Account type: IMAP or (POP)
Incoming server: mail.btinternet.com
Outgoing server: mail.btinternet.com
Logon information:
User name: prefix only of email address
Password: Email password
Tick remember password
Do not tick Require password auth (SPA)
Click Button More settings
Tick box my out going server requires authentication
Tick box use same as incoming
Do not tick log onto incoming server
Advanced Button
Incoming server 993 or (POP 995) Tick requires SSL
Outgoing server 465 Use following type encryption SSL

IMessage: Sender/Receiver 'Bubbles' Don't Alternate - All Blue in String

My wife and I have an iPhone 4 and an iPad 2 (Wi-Fi only) between the two of us. Both devices have iOS 5.0 or better and both are using the same Apple ID and iTunes account. Here's the problem: When I iMessage the iPhone from the iPad (or vice versa), my message displays as a blue bubble, on the right side, ON THE iPHONE I just sent to. If she replies to that iMessage, it shows up as a blue bubble on the right side on the iPad. In other words, our iMessage conversations all appear one-sided. There are no grey bubbles. It's just a string of blue bubbles along the right side.
However, to complicate this anomaly further, every once in a while one of our replies shows up as a grey 'reply' bubble. But then the very next reply ends up on the blue bubble side.
The conversation displays identically on both devices. The irriating thing about this anamoly, is the incoming message alarm doesn't sound because the device sees it as coming from itself.
Any ideas?

Regarding the grey bubble, who knows. You're using the iMessage app in a way it was not intended, so I can't comment on why it behaves like it does.
As far as the algorithm is concerned, the two devices are "owned" by the same person. Say you have the iPad and Wifey has the iPhone and the wife tries to send a text to the iPad. Apple ID doesn't care. All it sees is a user trying to send a text to himself.
The reason you can use the same ID with two different devices is to keep the messages synced. In my case, for example, I have an iPhone and an iPad. When I respond to an iMessage message from another user, that response is synced to both devices. It lets me pick up either device and keep the conversation going.
As I said before, if you want to have the messages display properly between the two devices, you need different IDs on each device.

VBFA index in sender/receiver system

Experts,
I'm looking through the operations guide for TDMS and notes related to peformance , Note 1256679 - Long runtime in VBUK_2 if VBELN in table VBFA has no index specifically says:
Create index on table VBFA:
ideally, by creating an index as follows:
Mandt
VBELN
VBELV
POSNV
So even though I'm at the latest levels on DMIS:
DMIS     2006_1_700     0013     SAPK-61713INDMIS
DMIS_CNT     2006_1_700     0013     SAPK-61713INDMISCNT
DMIS_BSC     2008_1_700     0005     SAPK-81705INDMISBSC
DMIS_EXT     2007_1_700     0007     SAPK-71707INDMISEXT
DMIS_HR     2008_1_700     0004     SAPK-81704INDMISHR
Do you think this index should be set?
Thanks Nick

Hello NIck,
The Correction of the SAPnote that you mentioned are delivered with the old support packages but the manual steps that is explained regarding the index will still be very helpfull in increasing the performance.
Best Regards
Niraj

Sending & Receiving SO electronically

Hello,
I have one scenario.I will be receiving the customer PO electronically i.e through IDOC. I will make sales order & send the Order confirmation to my customer electronically i.e through IDOC.
Now my question is how to configure inbound & outbound IDOC in the system. As far I know this involves more from technical side but I want to know what are the programs to be used for sending & receiving IDOCs. what is the logic by which one can send & receive IDOCs.Please provide me in detail.
Regards,
Naveed Ansari.

Hi there,
To send / receive the IDOCs to / from SAP, you will need to have the partnwer profiles defined in WE20. You will define the sending / receiving systems as partners in WE20.
Then you will define the IDOC message types in WE30. There you can also specify what segmenst you need & what data needs to go in the segments.
Then you will assign the message type to the inbound & outbound paramaters in WE20. Every message type will have a relevant IDOC posting / processing progs. You will have to asign them to the message types.
For eg: When a PO is created, SAP will receive the IDOC from an external system. The IDOC posting prog will be called which will post the information into the SAP application doc. Here PO or SO.
When the sales order is created, the IDOC O/p will be created. The IDOC processing progs will send the IDOC into the partner recciver port. It will call an RFC which will post an application doc into the external system.
All the posting progs are developed by the ABAP. So contact your ABAPer & explain the functionality. But partner profiles are defined by func consultants.
Regards,
Sivanand

Wsus Sync Failed. WebException: The underlying connection was closed: An unexpected error occurred on a send. --- System.IO.IOException: Received an unexpected EOF or 0 bytes from the transport stream.

Hi I have installed wsus 3 sp2 on a win 2008 R2 Sp1
before the installation , I have updated the windows
I can open easily browse internet , but when I try to configure synchronization .but it fails.
No firewall , no proxy ............. I am behind a nat.
Wsus version is 3.2.7600.256.
I have searched and searched .....
Can any body help me
WebException: The underlying connection was closed: An unexpected error occurred on a send. ---> System.IO.IOException: Received an unexpected EOF or 0 bytes from the transport stream.
at System.Web.Services.Protocols.WebClientProtocol.GetWebResponse(WebRequest request)
   at System.Web.Services.Protocols.HttpWebClientProtocol.GetWebResponse(WebRequest request)
   at Microsoft.UpdateServices.ServerSync.ServerSyncCompressionProxy.GetWebResponse(WebRequest webRequest)
   at System.Web.Services.Protocols.SoapHttpClientProtocol.Invoke(String methodName, Object[] parameters)
   at Microsoft.UpdateServices.ServerSyncWebServices.ServerSync.ServerSyncProxy.GetAuthConfig()
   at Microsoft.UpdateServices.ServerSync.ServerSyncLib.InternetGetServerAuthConfig(ServerSyncProxy proxy, WebServiceCommunicationHelper webServiceHelper)
   at Microsoft.UpdateServices.ServerSync.ServerSyncLib.Authenticate(AuthorizationManager authorizationManager, Boolean checkExpiration, ServerSyncProxy proxy, Cookie cookie, WebServiceCommunicationHelper webServiceHelper)
   at Microsoft.UpdateServices.ServerSync.CatalogSyncAgentCore.SyncConfigUpdatesFromUSS()
   at Microsoft.UpdateServices.Serve

Hi
yes . it is alloweded.
Nat rule permits any ip traffic . No problem with https...
also my windows is fully updated.
here is my netstat -an , maybe usefull.
TCP    0.0.0.0:135            0.0.0.0:0              LISTENING
TCP    0.0.0.0:445            0.0.0.0:0              LISTENING
TCP    0.0.0.0:8530           0.0.0.0:0              LISTENING
TCP    0.0.0.0:8531           0.0.0.0:0              LISTENING
TCP    0.0.0.0:47001          0.0.0.0:0              LISTENING
TCP    0.0.0.0:49152          0.0.0.0:0              LISTENING
TCP    0.0.0.0:49153          0.0.0.0:0              LISTENING
TCP    0.0.0.0:49154          0.0.0.0:0              LISTENING
TCP    0.0.0.0:49155          0.0.0.0:0              LISTENING
TCP    0.0.0.0:49156          0.0.0.0:0              LISTENING
TCP    --------------------:139       0.0.0.0:0              LISTENING
TCP    --------------------:8530      172.16.2.201:53317     ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49362     23.65.244.185:443      ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49363     23.65.244.185:443      ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49367     23.65.244.185:443      ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49377     23.65.244.185:443      ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49414     131.253.34.141:443     ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49416     216.239.32.20:80       ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49417     216.239.32.20:80       ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49418     173.194.70.113:80      ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49419     173.194.70.113:80      ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49420     65.52.103.78:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49421     65.52.103.78:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49424     88.221.93.31:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49425     88.221.93.30:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49426     88.221.93.30:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49427     88.221.93.31:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49428     88.221.93.31:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49429     88.221.93.31:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49430     88.221.93.30:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49431     88.221.93.30:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49432     88.221.93.31:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49433     88.221.93.31:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49434     88.221.93.30:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49435     88.221.93.31:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49436     88.221.93.30:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49437     88.221.93.30:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49438     88.221.93.30:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49439     88.221.93.30:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49440     88.221.93.31:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49441     88.221.93.30:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49442     88.221.93.30:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49443     88.221.93.54:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49444     88.221.93.54:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49445     88.221.93.63:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49446     88.221.93.63:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49447     88.221.93.63:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49448     88.221.93.63:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49449     88.221.93.63:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49450     88.221.93.31:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49451     88.221.93.31:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49453     88.221.93.30:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49456     65.55.58.184:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49457     65.55.58.184:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49460     131.253.34.142:80      ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49461     131.253.34.142:80      ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49462     65.52.103.78:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49463     65.52.103.78:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49464     63.251.85.33:80        ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49466     131.253.40.50:80       ESTABLISHED
TCP    --------------------:49467     131.253.40.50:80       ESTABLISHED

Conversion rule executed in sender and receiver system?

Hello experts,
I want to send an Idoc from one SAP system to another.
Both systems are in the same transport line.
In the sender system I want to execute a field conversion. There
Therefore I maintained BD62 (Define Conversion Rule), BD55 (activate Conversion Rule for Sender/Receiver combination) and BD79 (Specifie Conversion).
The mapping works perfectly.
The creation of the IDoc and the field conversion work perfectly.
But I get an error in the receiver system.
It seems that this system also tries to execute the fieldmapping, because it has the same BD55 (sender/receiver) settings.
The conversion rule itself does not exist in the receiver system, as these settings are not contained in a transport request.
What is the correct way? Can I customize BD55 not to generate a transport request and maintain this setting only in the relevant system?
Or do I need to maintain BD79 and BD62 also manually in the receiver system?
any hints
Barbara

Hi Barbara,
you have to maintain BD79 and BD62 manually in all receiver Systems.
Kind regards
Werner

BPM when both sender and receiver systems are Sync. Please help!

Hi Experts,
I want to use BPM when both sender and receiver systems are Sync. For example: web service ---> RFC
I have tried the solution as given in the blog
https://weblogs.sdn.sap.com/pub/u/39730 [original link is broken] [original link is broken]
but it does not work. I am getting Time Out error.
Can somebody tell me the correct way of configuring BPM for sync-sync scenario?
Kindly give the integraion directory steps also.
Thanks
Gopal

Hi Hemant,
I have already tried the solution as given in the blog (https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/wlg/1403 [original link is broken] [original link is broken] [original link is broken])but it does not work. When I run the scenario I am getting Time out error.
<SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">
<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>
<SAP:Code area="INTERNAL">PL_TIMEOUT</SAP:Code>
<SAP:P1 />
<SAP:P2 />
<SAP:P3 />
<SAP:P4 />
<SAP:AdditionalText />
<SAP:ApplicationFaultMessage namespace="" />
<SAP:Stack>Timeout condition of pipeline reached</SAP:Stack>
<SAP:Retry>N</SAP:Retry>
</SAP:Error>
Please help!
Thanks & Regards,
Gopal

Why am I suddenly receiving the message: 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 501-"5.1.8 Bad sender's system address" I am only getting it for Mozilla Thunderbird

In the past three days, whenever I send a message, it does not go through. Instead, I get the message: 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 501- "5.1.8 Bad sender's system address". I tried downloading the newest version of Thunderbird but it did not work. I do not receive this message when using other software.

I had the look that you suggested. As far as I can tell there are no problems with the user name. Maybe I should check with my email company, Cogeco?

Can IDoc sender and receive system be the same client?

thanks.
I think one client can't assign to two logical system.so?

<i>Can IDoc sender and receive system be the same client?</i>
yes
Regards,
Prateek

Sender system and Receiver system

Hi,
I have installed xi on on the server name is XI1 and there is two client 001 and 300. i have created xisuper user on 001. Pls tell me which is sender system or receiver system and xi system.
Please give me some secnario
Thannks

Hi,
you can Use Either (001 or 300 )one of the client for XI Perspective.
And you can send the data through this Client in Xi to any Application
Example:
if you want to send the data from FTP Server to SAP R/3 (100 Client)means
Here You can use either 001 or 300 client of XI as Middleware to send the data to SAP R/3
in this case
Your sender is the FTP Server(File Adapter)--XI is the Middleware--SAP R/3(100 Client) is the Receiver
Regards
Seshagiri

IDoc Message Type different in sending to receiver system

Hi,
I am sending DESADV (message type) IDoc to other SAP system. But problem is in other system Message Type DESADV is available in a different name ie DESADV1.
No of segments and their name are same in both the system are same..
In that case if i am sending DESADV from sending system whether receiver system can get IDoc?
Note: In sending system i could not able create message type DESADV1
Sa_R.

Hii..
Looking like Strange scenario...
Normally we must have the Same message type in both Sender and Receiver systems.
Bcoz whenever the IDOC is Received in the Receiving system it will process based on the Message type. So the Same message type must exist in the Sender as well as Receiver.
I can think of a Solution: Just try..
In the Sender system Create a Reduced message type (Tcode BD53) Of the Message type DESADV. Select all the Segments and Fields
In the Receiver system also Create a Reduced message type with the Same name as Sender system (Tcode BD53) Of the Message type DESADV1. Select all the Segments and Fields.
Then use this Reduced message type since it exists in both the Systems.
<b>Reward if Helpful.</b>

Send/receive IDOCs to SOLMAN system using AS2 protocol!

Hi All,
I want to send/receive IDOC file to/from web based SOLMAN system. Currently I'm using FTP server to send/receive IDOC file.
As of now the current process is to send the IDOCs from ECC to FTP server and from FTP to third party and vice-versa. But due to some constraints, I'm bound to use web based SOLMAN system. Please, can you let me know how to send/receive IDOC files to SOLMAN. Is there standrad FM/method to connect to SOLMAN from ECC as in case of FTP we have FM 'FTP_CONNECT'. Heard that same functionality in case of SOLMAN can be achieved through AS2 protocol.
Kindly help.
Thanks.
Regards,
Mukesh

Hello Patrice
We have same issue. Is it possible to use IDoc (XML) directly with SAP 5.0 with SOAP (HTTP) without XI?
Since your que is three years old, I'm sure you must have found some method for this.
We'll highly appreciate your help.
Regards: Gaurave

How to Send One file to different Receiver Systems without using ESR Object

Hi Gurus
I have developed two interafces in my current project and they are both By pass scenarios. My requirement was to Send Data from MDM system to BW system. This development does not involve any ESR objects, By Pass sceanrio.
Now there is the requirement to Send one file or files from MDM system to different BW( two BW systems for different regions)
How can i accomplish this.
here we are not using any ESR Objects, so to maintain any condition in Receiver Determination is not possible.
Please let me know how to do this.
Tahnx in advance.

Hi Arjun,
If i understand your situation correctly, You need to define two separate Business Systems/Components in SLD for each BW system.
if you intend to send the file from MDM to both the BW systems, then you need to configure the following:
1. If you want to follow the classical approach (for this by-pass scenario):
a) Two receiver channels - One for each BW system
b) Two receiver agreements for each channel
c) One Receiver determination - with both the receiver systems added as receivers (w/o condition)
d) Two interface determination - Dummy mappings as it is a by-pass scenario
2. If yo want to go ahead with the Integrated Configuration (most preferred in this case):
a) Two receiver channels - One for each BW system
b) One Integrated Configuration Scenario (ICO) with both the receivers configured in Outbound Processing tab
Let us know if you were looking for something else (as your problem statement is not very clear)
Hope this helps.
Regards, Gaurav

Verification of email done why can't I send/receive text

Why can't I send/receive text even after my email has been verified by Apple ID and password

See:
iOS: Troubleshooting Messages
Remember you can only test to and from other uses who have the Messages app on their iPod, iPhone or iPad.

Transporting a Structure: Sending & Receiving Systems Don't Match?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for